Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1-00*
I. OBJECTIVE
This Order prescribes the use of the Updated Handbook on Audit Procedures and Techniques
(Volume I) in the audit of tax returns. The Handbook is intended to provide revenue officers with
minimum standard procedures and a uniform guideline for the proper examination and/or
investigation of tax liabilities. This updated version was prepared in order to conform with the
provisions of the Tax Reform Act of 1997".
The purpose of auditing a tax return is to determine the taxpayer's substantially correct tax
liability. A quality audit is the examination of the taxpayer's books and records in sufficient
depth for the purpose of ascertaining the correctness and validity of entries and the propriety of
application of tax laws. To ensure quality audit of tax returns, revenue officers are enjoined to
utilize their technical skill, training and experience, and follow the minimum audit procedures
prescribed in the Handbook under Annex "A" hereof.
Revenue Officers are required to make a report after the audit has been conducted. All reports
should contain the minimum documentary requirements specified under Chapter XVII of the
Handbook.
This Order supersedes Revenue Audit Memorandum Order No. 2-951, all revenue issuances and
portions thereof inconsistent herewith.
V. EFFECTIVITY
All revenue officers and other employees concerned are hereby directed to refer to the aforesaid
Handbook in the audit/investigation of tax returns immediately after the approval of this Order.
PREFACE
The enactment of the National Internal Revenue Code of 1997 and its implementation effective
January 1, 1998 marked significant changes in Philippine taxation and the BIR's tax
administration policies. Hence, it is necessary to revise and update the existing revenue issuances
and assessment manuals in accordance with the new provisions of the Tax Code.
In order to utilize audit as an effective tool in the enhancement of voluntary compliance, the first
volume of the Handbook on Audit Procedures and Techniques has been revised and updated to
conform with the new Tax Code. This volume discusses general procedures and techniques
designed to assist the Revenue Officer in the investigation of tax liabilities of taxpayers. The
audit procedures and techniques for the investigation of Value-Added Tax liabilities are
prescribed in a separate manual.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The updating of this Handbook on Audit Procedures and Techniques - Volume I was completed
under the leadership of Commissioner Dakila B. Fonacier and Deputy Commissioners Romeo S.
Panganiban, Estelita C. Aguirre, Sixto S. Esquivias IV and Lilia C. Guillermo.
This Handbook is a project of the Assessment Service with the Assessment Programs Division as
the lead division which spearheaded the project. Acknowledgment is also extended to Atty.
Arnulfo B. Romero, Mr. Rodolfo Mendoza and Mr. Manny B. Jimenez for their comments and
invaluable contribution to the project.
ASSESSMENT SERVICE
Table of Contents
I. Introduction
Cash Basis
Accrual Basis
Completion of Contract Basis
Percentage of Completion Basis
Installment Basis
Crop Year Basis
Journal
Ledger
Subsidiary Book
Computerized Accounting System
V. Accounting Period
Calendar Year
Fiscal Year
Income Statement
Balance Sheet
General Standards
Standards of Preliminary Planning
Standards of Field Work
Standards of Public Relations
XI. Audit of Minimum Corporate Income Tax and Improper Accumulation of Earnings Tax
Percentage Method
Net Worth Method
Bank Deposit Method
Cash Expenditure Method
Unit and Value Method
Third Party Information (Access to Records) Method
Withholding Taxes
Capital Gains Tax
Estate Tax
Donor's Tax
XV. General Policies in the Investigation of Tax Fraud Cases
Jurisdiction
Procedures
Civil Fraud
Appendix
Revenue Memorandum Order No. 15-952
Checklist of Documents to be Submitted by a Taxpayer upon Audit of his Tax Liabilities as well
as of the Mandatory Reporting Requirements to be Prepared by a Revenue Officer, all of which
comprise a complete Tax Docket
I. INTRODUCTION
The function of the Bureau of Internal Revenue is to administer the provisions of the National
Internal Revenue Code. It is the duty of the Bureau to implement the Tax Code and related laws
enacted by Congress in a fair and impartial manner.
The mission of the Bureau is to enforce internal revenue laws with impartiality, consistency,
collect the correct amount of taxes at the least cost to the government and least inconvenience to
the taxpayer and serve the public honestly and efficiently in a manner that will elicit the highest
level of confidence in the Bureau of Internal Revenue.
Investigation supports the mission of the Bureau by enhancing a high degree of compliance and
encouraging the correct reporting of income, transfer, business ant other taxes. This is
accomplished by:
The purpose of auditing a tax return is to determine the taxpayer's correct tax liability. A quality
audit is the examination of a taxpayer's books and records in sufficient depth so as to ascertain
the correctness and validity of entries thereon and- the propriety of application of tax laws.
B. Purpose
The updated Handbook on Audit Procedures and Techniques has been prepared to equip all
Revenue Officers who conduct field examinations with-the necessary knowledge for the proper
examination of tax returns and provide them with confidence in carrying out the investigation.
This Handbook is designed to ensure that. the Revenue Officer acquires useful auditing skills,
progresses from simple audit techniques to more sophisticated procedures, and advances in
examination procedures from a single proprietorship to a large corporation and from a simple
bookkeeping system to a highly computerized one.
The Revenue Officer's job is to familiarize himself with the business activity and/or undertaking
of the taxpayers assigned to him for audit, to evaluate the various methods and procedures the
taxpayers apply, to be imaginative, observant and inquisitive in his examination, and above all,
to use common sense.
The handbook contains guides, instructions and suggestions in the conduct of audit for various
taxpayers. The discussions begin with the analysis of tax returns and financial statements,
familiarization with accounting methods, bookkeeping systems, books of accounts and other
related records. The audit procedures for balance sheet and income statement accounts are laid
out together with investigation techniques for each type of tax. This does not preclude, however,
the Revenue Officer from carrying out other audit techniques which are deemed necessary in the
circumstances surrounding a particular case.
The Handbook is neither intended to provide a source of tax law or procedural doctrine nor a
substitute reference material of revenue issuances. Each Revenue Officer is presumed to have a
working knowledge of the Tax Code, the latest amendments thereon, and an update of existing
revenue regulations, revenue rulings, revenue memorandum orders and other issuances.
The other contents of the handbook include documentary requirements in the investigation
process and proper report making.
A. Cash Basis is a method of accounting whereby all items of gross income received during
the year shall be accounted for such taxable year and that only expenses actually paid for shall be
claimed as deductions during the year. This method of accounting is generally used by taxpayers
who do not keep regular books of accounts. Under this method, income is realized upon receipt
of cash or its equivalent including those constructively received (such as deposits for the
taxpayer's account by customers) but not including gifts or donations. Users of cash basis
accounting are mostly individuals engaged in business and practice of profession, professional
partnerships and professional service organizations.
B. Accrual Basis is a method of accounting for income in the period it is earned regardless
of whether it has been received or not. In the same manner, expenses are accounted for in the
period they are incurred and not in the period they are paid. Under this method, net income is
being measured by the excess of income earned during the period over the expenses incurred.
Expenses not being claimed as deductions by taxpayers in the current year when they are
incurred cannot be claimed as deduction from income for the succeeding year. Thus, a taxpayer
who is authorized to deduct certain expenses and other allowable deductions for the current year
but failed to do so cannot deduct the same for the next year. The accrual basis of accounting is
being used by taxpayers whose nature of business uses inventories since this method of
accounting will correctly reflect income by matching purchases and expenses against sales. This
method is being applied by most medium and large corporations.
Under this method, gross income is to be reported in the taxable year in which the contract is
fully completed and accepted by the contractee if the taxpayer elected it as a consistent practice
to treat such income, provided that such method clearly reflects the net income. Under this
method, all expenditures, are deducted from gross income during the life of the contract which
are properly allocated thereto, taking into consideration any materials and supplies charged to the
work under the contract but remaining on hand at the time of the completion.
However, pursuant to Republic Act No. 8424 which took effect on January 1, 1998, contractors
are no longer allowed to adopt this method of reporting their income derived in whole or in part
from long-term contracts.
1. The costs incurred under the contract as of the end of the tax year are compared with the
estimated total contract costs; or
2. The work performed on the contract as of the end of the tax year is compared with the
estimated work to be performed.
In such case, the return should be accompanied by a certificate of the architect or engineer
showing the percentage of completion during the taxable year of the entire work performed
under contract. There should be deducted from such gross income all expenditures made during
the taxable year on account of the contract, account being taken of the materials and supplies on
hand at the beginning and end of the taxable period for use in connection with the work under the
contract but not yet so applied.
Beginning January 1, 1998 income from log-term contracts are required to be reported using this
method only.
F. Crop Year Basis is a method applicable only to farmers engaged in the production of
crops which take more than a year from the time of planting to the process of gathering and
disposal. Expenses paid or incurred are deductible in the year the gross income from the sale of
the crops are realized.
In relation to the foregoing accounting methods, the Tax Code provides for a tax credit system in
computing the tax payable by certain taxpayers. While the tax credit system is not an accounting
system, it is discussed here for the proper understanding of the computation of taxes due from
taxpayers.
The tax credit system is a method used to account for the creditable taxes deducted by the
withholding agents from the income payments to certain payees (as in the case of withholding
tax at source pursuant to Revenue Regulations (RR) No. 6-85, as amended by RR 2-98, or the
creditable tax added to the sales price (as in the case of value-added tax). The creditable taxes
should be clearly identified in the books of the taxpayer, such as:
Bookkeeping may be classified into two systems, namely, (1) the single entry and (2) the double
entry.
A. Single Entry System of bookkeeping is basically a type of "net worth" method of arriving
at net income. It records only the debit or credit of each transaction, or an account with the
debtor or creditor and a simple record of cash receipts and disbursements.
Whenever a system of record keeping does not include equal debit and credit to asset, liability,
proprietorship, income and expense accounts, it is referred to AA a "single entry system". The
single entry is often used by comparatively simple ventures such as small retail or commission
merchants, professional firms, estates and trusts. In many cases, the only record of income and
deductions consists of entries on the stubs of their checkbooks. Some taxpayers maintain an
income tax folder in which they place documents to support their income tax deductions.
A single entry system may be merely a chronological record of transactions posted in a notebook
or journal.
Sometimes, the records consist of a complete set of journals (cash, sales, purchases and general
journal) and general ledger providing important accounts.
The accounting cycle starts with source documents (invoices, bills, paid checks, loan documents,
bank deposit slips, and bank statements) proceeding to the cash receipts and cash disbursements
journal, working paper summary and ending with the tax return.
Reconciliation of the taxpayer's books, working paper summary and records to the return is a
very important audit step. In this way, the Revenue Officer will become familiar with the
taxpayer's accounting system, policies and control procedures. If the records available are
organized, this will lend more credibility to the tax return, but if they are inadequate, then the
Revenue Officer should closely scrutinize the information on the income tax return. Therefore,
when encountered with the lack of formal books and records, the Revenue Officer must use
source documents and other available documents to establish the taxpayer's financial position
which shall be compared with the taxpayer's standard of living and business activity for
validation.
The following formulae for reconstruction of income and expenses may be found useful:
1. Computation of Sales
2. Computation of Purchases
B. Double Entry System - Under this system of bookkeeping, accounting recognizes the
two-fold effect of every recorded event, the debit and the credit or the object of the event and the
equitable interest in that object. Every recorded event affecting one side must necessarily affect
the other side. This can be presented in an equation:
This can be analyzed into its component elements which show that there are two distinct parties
that have right in the assets of the business, the creditors and the owners. The rights of the
creditors are the claims of such creditors on the assets of the business which are referred to as
liabilities and the rights of the owners on the business are referred to as capital.
In the double entry method, any net increase and net decrease in asset has a corresponding
increase and decrease in either liabilities or capital.
Audit of accounting records under this system shall be detailed as presented in the discussions of
audit of real and nominal accounts.
Taxpayers are required by law and regulations to keep and maintain accounting records in
sufficient detail to enable them to make a proper return of income. The Commissioner of Internal
Revenue is authorized to examine such records or other data which may be relevant in
ascertaining the correctness of the tax returns. The books and records kept must be sufficient to
establish the amount of the gross income and the deductions, credits and other matters required
to be shown in the tax return.
The primary records commonly used by all. types of businesses, considering the different
accounting systems and reporting methods of the business are invoices, vouchers, bills, receipts
and other source documents which are also the supporting documents in the selling and buying
of merchandise, services and other assets used in the business. For companies which require the
use of inventories, the primary records include the detailed inventory list. Other primary records
used in financial transactions are the cancelled checks, duplicate deposit slips, bank statements
and notes.
The secondary records, regardless of the accounting method used by the taxpayer, include
permanent books of accounts and working papers which summarize and list the individual
documents including adjustments, when necessary. These records are properly classified in such
a way that the taxpayer will be able to determine the financial status of his business in a given
period of time and the profit and loss for the period.
All records required to be kept by the taxpayers should be preserved by them for proper
administration of any internal revenue law.
1. Sales Journal. This is a book whereby sales on account are recorded which are supported
by sales invoices and which are also the documents that will serve as the basis of recording the
transactions in the books of accounts.
Cash sales are usually recorded in the cash book although it may be posted in both books
representing a debit to cash in the cash book and a credit to sales in the sales book.
Every entry in the sales journal represents a debit to a customer's account and a credit to sales to
be posted in the general ledger.
Sales returns and allowances are also recorded in the sales book which represents a debit to Sales
Returns and Allowances and a credit to Accounts Receivable to be posted in the general ledger.
This would mean a decrease in Sales and eventually a decrease in an asset account.
2. Purchase Journal. This is a book used to record exclusively all transactions involving the
purchase or acquisition of merchandise on account.
The business document that serves as evidence of a purchase transaction is the purchase invoice.
An entry to record charge purchases is a debit to Purchases and a credit to Accounts Payable to
be posted in the general ledger.
Purchase returns and allowances are also recorded in this book and posted in the general ledger
representing a debit to Accounts Payable and a credit to Purchase Returns and Allowances which
would mean a decrease in the purchases account.
In certain instances where the volume of business is large and under the Value-Added Tax
system, taxpayers maintain subsidiary sales and purchase journals where details of daily sales
and purchases are recorded.
3. Cash Book is a book whereby all transactions involving cash such as cash receipts or
cash disbursements are recorded.
3.1 Cash receipts book - a book whereby all transactions involving cash receipts of whatever
source are recorded.
3.2. Cash disbursements book - a book whereby all transactions involving cash or check
disbursements are recorded.
B Ledger is a book of final entry wherein the classified accounts or items of all transactions
entered in the journal are posted. All entries in the journal must be posted to the ledger and shall
be classified accordingly so as to show the assets, liabilities, capital and the operating accounts.
This will be the basis for the preparation of the balance sheet and the profit and loss statement
covering the operation of the business. No entry shall be made in the ledger unless said entry
originates from the journal.
The accounts contained in the general ledger provide the Revenue Officer with insight of the
operations of the business. When pertinent, the chart of accounts and subsidiary ledgers, if any,
should be requested from the taxpayer. If a private ledger is maintained, it should also be
requested.
As the Revenue Officer goes through the ledger, unusual or non-recurring items should be noted
and verified. Most of these items are classified as follows:
1. Unusual in amount - The Revenue Officer should be alert for month end entries with
significant amounts which may affect income and expenses.
2. Unusual by Source - means the books of accounts from where the entry to the ledger
account originates. Hence, expenses or adjustments to income which do not ordinarily originate
from the cash journals, sales and purchase books should be investigated. Such adjustments
originating from the general journal or journal vouchers should be thoroughly examined as to
supporting documents and proper authorization.
C. Subsidiary Book. In the general ledger, accounts are usually transferred and grouped into
certain accounts to a subsidiary book. This general ledger account is called control account.
Control accounts in the general ledger contain summarized information that is recorded in detail
in a subsidiary book or ledger. It is, therefore, the control account which contains summarized
information and the subsidiary ledger contains the same information but in detail.
Thus, in order to relieve the general ledger of too many individual accounts, business concerns
having numerous accounts with customers and creditors will transfer said accounts to separate
ledgers - one for customers and another for creditors.
For example, the control account for the customer's subsidiary book will be called "Accounts
Receivable", while the control account for the creditor's subsidiary book will be called "Accounts
Payable".
All corporations, companies, partnerships or persons required by law to pay internal revenue
taxes have the option to keep this kind of book depending on the need of their business, provided
that where such books are kept, they shall form part of the accounting records of the taxpayer
and shall be subject to the same rules and regulations as to their keeping, translation, production
and inspection as are applicable to the journal and the ledger.
D. Computerized Accounting System. This method of accounting is now being used by most
companies. It is a system whereby information are fed into the computer thus providing
uniformity in the processing of transactions.
Types of System under this method are the following:
1. Simple System. Transactions are easily traced in a small computer system where the
primary function performed is the sorting and manipulation of input data and the printing of
output reports. There is no loss of audit trail. Audit of this type of system requires little training
and background in Information Systems (IS).
An example of this type of system are shipping data that are encoded and processed throughout
the system along with accounts receivable ledgers. The output is a multicopy sales invoice for
each sale, an updated subsidiary ledger, and a sales journal.
2. Complex System. This is characterized by the batch processing mode, the existence of
one Central Processing Unit (CPU) and the extensive use of master files on magnetic media in
processing. In this type of system, processing is usually confined to calculations, extensions,
summarizations and the like. There is some loss of audit trail but the same is not significant. The
audit of such system can be done by auditors with limited specialized training in IS auditing.
Because of the extent of a printed audit trail, the auditors have the option of performing audit
tests with or without the use of the computer based on his experience.
3. Sophisticated System. In this type of system, transactions are initiated within the
computer. There is extensive data processing and consequently, a substantial loss of audit trail.
Most of the output is in machine-readable form.
Heavily reliance must be placed on internal control in the audit of said system. Since many of
these tests require IS skills beyond the knowledge of most auditors, IS specialists are usually
called upon by the auditors.
Careful advanced planning is necessary because records needed in audit and the approach to be
used in testing must be made before data are processed.
V. Accounting Periods
2. Fiscal year
A. Calendar Year - is an accounting period which starts from January 1, and ends on
December 31. This is used by most taxpayers who elect the calendar year as their accounting
period. However, the calendar year shall be the basis of computing the net income in the
following cases:
B. Fiscal year - is an accounting period of twelve months ending on the last day of any
month other than December 31.
Corporations and duly registered general co-partnerships are allowed to use this type of
accounting period.
A taxpayer may have a taxable period of less than twelve (12) months in the following cases:
1. when a corporation is newly organized and commenced operations on any day within the
year;
4. when the Commissioner of Internal Revenue, by authority, terminates the taxable period
of a taxpayer pursuant to Section 6 (D) of the Tax Code; and
5. in case of final return of the decedent and such period ends at the time of his death.
Change in Accounting Period - An individual cannot change his accounting period from the
calendar year to the fiscal year. He is only allowed to use the calendar year.
A corporation and a general co-partnership have the option to choose between the calendar year
and the fiscal year.
The application for a change in accounting period should be filed in writing with the
Commissioner of Internal Revenue, through the Revenue District Office, where the business is
registered, within thirty (30) days prior to the date fixed for filing of the return on the basis of the
original accounting period designating therein the proposed date for the closing of its new
taxable year.
Financial Statements are reports signifying the end result of the financial accounting process.
These reports are as follows:
A. Income Statement - is a report that summarizes the business activities for a given period
and reports the net income or loss resulting from operations and from certain other activities. It is
variously called the earnings statement, the statement of profit and loss, and the statement of
operations. It normally consists of the following sections or items:
1. Sales - reports the total sales to customers and fees received from clients for the period.
All sales transactions should be recorded and invoiced.
2. Cost of goods sold - refers to cost of goods relating to sales when merchandise is
acquired from outsiders. This is the sum of the beginning inventory, purchases and all other
buying, freight and storage costs relating to the acquisition of goods and subtracting the ending
inventory thereof. When the goods are manufactured by the seller, the cost of goods
manufactured must first be calculated. This is the sum of the cost of goods in process at the
beginning, the cost of materials put into production, the cost of labor applied and factory
overhead incurred. The total cost as thus obtained represents the cost of both completed work
and uncompleted work still in production. The ending goods in process inventory, then, must be
subtracted from this total in arriving at the cost of the product completed and made available for
sale.
4. Other Income and Expenses - include items identified with financial management and
miscellaneous recurring activities. Other income include interest and dividend income and
income from rentals, royalties and service fees. Other expenses include interest expense and
expenses related to the miscellaneous income items reported.
B. Balance Sheet - is a report that shows the financial position of the business unit as of a
specified moment of time.
It is a status report rather than a flow report. It is variously called statement of financial position,
statement of condition, statement of resources and liabilities and the statement of net worth. The
balance sheet is the fundamental accounting statement in the sense that every accounting
transaction can be analyzed in terms of its effect on the balance sheet. In order to understand the
information a balance sheet conveys and how economic events affect the balance sheet, it is
essential that the reader be absolutely clear as to the meaning of its two sides in the equation:
2. Liabilities - measure the claims of creditors against entity resources. The method for
settlement of liabilities varies. Liabilities may call for settlement by cash payment or settlement
through goods to be delivered or services to be performed.
3. Owner's Equity - is the residual interest in the assets of an entity that remains after
deducting its liabilities. It measures the interest of the ownership group in the total resources of
the enterprise. Such equities originally arise as the result of contributions by the owners and the
equities change with the change in net assets resulting from operations.
The basic purpose of tax examination is the determination of correct taxable income as defined
by the National Internal Revenue Code and other internal revenue tax liabilities of the person or
entity whose return is being examined.
In conducting the examination, the Revenue Officer's responsibility is two-fold: to the taxpayer
and to the Philippine Government. Minimum standards of examination may be extended beyond
the originally intended scope, or beyond minimum requirements because of situations or facts
not apparent at the outset. The extent of verification to be done in any single tax examination is a
matter of auditing judgment for which no rigid guide can be established.
The degree of checking or scope of a tax examination may be influenced by an analysis of the
taxpayer's accounting procedures and the results achieved therefrom, for they measure the
credibility of the records and the degree of the existing system of internal control of the taxpayer.
Standard refers to the criteria by which the quality of performance of auditing examinations are
measured.
A. General Standards
2. Professional skill and ingenuity must be exercised in the performance of the examination
and the preparation of the report.
3. Issues should be raised only when, in the Revenue Officer's opinion, they have real merit
and only when they will contribute in the proper determination of tax liability.
4. The confidential nature of all information pertaining to any assignment must be strictly
observed.
1. Sound judgment should be exercised in selecting from assigned returns those which are
most likely to contain areas of non-compliance and, where otherwise permissible, survey
procedures should be employed to dispose of those which do not warrant further consideration.
2. Advance planning of work schedules with reasonable accuracy is essential for the
effective use of time.
3. A general work plan should be formulated in each case prior to contacting the taxpayer
which includes the development of issues suggested by the return and other information. The
following steps may be included in the work plan:
3.1 Prepare a list of items which suggest a need for special consideration.
3.3 Identify other agencies or offices where the Revenue Officer can have access to their
records if the taxpayer cannot present the documents requested.
1. Audits should normally be performed at the taxpayer's place of business because of the
accessibility of the books and records and to permit actual observation of taxpayers facilities and
scope of operations. Otherwise, it should be performed in the office of the Bureau of Internal
Revenue.
2. The use of accounting skills, tax knowledge and ingenuity should be directed toward
recognizing and raising issues which relate to non-compliance areas.
4. The position taken with respect to each issue should be supported by adequate authority.
D. Standards of Reporting
1. Reports are to be prepared in a complete, clear, concise, and legible manner in order that
they may be easily read and understood.
2. Working papers should be legible, in the Revenue Officer's own handwriting, properly
labeled, indexed, signed and arranged in a logical and orderly manner.
3. Working papers should be used as a practical and professional tool to aid the Revenue
Officer in the discussion of issues or questions with the taxpayer or his authorized representative.
It also generally provides a record of the audit procedures undertaken by the Revenue Officer.
1. Initial contact for audit arrangements should be made with the taxpayer and care should
be exercised in explaining the type of records required.
2. Revenue Officers must be fully cognizant of the proper sources for gathering information
and of the rights of the taxpayer and his representatives.
4. Tact and discretion are required in pointing out errors in books and records in order to
avoid discrediting an employee or representative of the taxpayer.
Analysis of the return is essential to an effective audit. Preliminary analysis is used to identify
potential issues which will be developed further after contacting the taxpayer. All information
contained in any attachment to the tax return should be thoroughly and completely scrutinized to
ascertain whether or not all of the information is adequately reflected in the tax return. Before
contacting the taxpayer, the Revenue Officer should familiarize himself with the following:
1. The business organization of the taxpayer and whether it has business establishments
other than its main or head office;
2. The location of the business and its branches as this has a relation to the volume of
business;
5. The accounting methods and policies and the degree of internal control;
11. Gross profit and selling expense percentage as well as significant variations between
prior and current years;
12. Inconsistencies between items and also in the treatment with respect to bad debts,
inventory valuation methods, depreciation rates and methods, etc.;
13. Prior years entries in the reconciliation schedules of retained earnings in a corporate
return and of a partner's capital account in a partnership return which affect the year under
examination;
14. The status of the retained earnings account as well as the basis of assets and depreciation
allowed or allowable; and
15. The report of the tax liabilities of the taxpayer for the immediately preceding period in
order to be aware of the deficiencies that were reported. Review of prior year's examination
records will clarify some doubts or questions in the Revenue Officer's mind regarding certain
items or bring light to situation that otherwise would have remained concealed on the basis of the
return alone.
B. Work Planning
In order to avoid any situation where the Revenue Officer will be faced with a situation of a
cramped audit workload and schedule, he should prioritize the audit of the assigned cases in the
following manner:
1. Returns or cases where the statute of limitations is about to prescribe should be given first
priority. Prescriptive period is three (3) years counted from the date prescribed by law for the
filing of the return, provided that in case a return is filed beyond the prescribed period, the three-
year period shall be counted from the day the return; was filed.
2. Claims for refund should be given the next priority in order to develop good BIR-
taxpayer relationship.
In work planning, an Audit Program should be prepared for each and every case. An Audit
Program is a checklist of the various auditing procedures to be undertaken and the various books
of accounts, records, documents and business forms to be verified in order to assess the correct
tax due from a taxpayer. This checklist would serve as a guide for the Revenue Officer to
conduct a "quality audit" within the time frame allowed to conclude a tax audit. It is also a tool
of the tax administrators to check on the progress of the tax audit and for proper evaluation of the
performance of the Revenue Officer.
2.1 On the first opportunity of the Revenue Officer to have personal contact with the
taxpayer, he should present the Letter of Authority (LA) together with a copy of the Taxpayer's
Bill of Rights. The LA should be served by the Revenue Officer assigned to the case and no one
else. He should have the proper identification card and should be in proper attire.
2.3 A Letter of Authority must be served or presented to the taxpayer within 30 days from its
date of issue; otherwise, it becomes null and void unless revalidated. The taxpayer has all the
right to refuse its service if presented beyond the 30-day period depending on the policy set by
top management. Revalidation is done by issuing a new Letter of Authority or by just simply
stamping the words "Revalidated on _____________" on the face of the copy of the Letter of
Authority issued.
The Revenue Officer should clearly specify the records he desires to be assembled for his
examination. Among the books and records that may be required are:
3.3 vouchers
3.5 bills and statements of accounts (utility bills, payment notices, etc.)
4. Initial Interview
The initial interview is the most important part of the examination process and should be
conducted in all audits.
Request should be made for a personal interview with the taxpayer himself.
4.1 Discussion of sources of income - This may uncover possible sources of income which
have not been reported such as interests on investments and deposits, dividends, rents, sales of
properties as well as information on the taxpayer's financial history and standard of living;
The investigation on the taxpayer's books of accounts may begin with miscellaneous records
other than accounting ledgers and journals. More often than not, scrutiny of these records may
reveal items which the Revenue Officer should take into consideration as the examination
progresses. The records and information to be obtained are the following:
1. Minute Book
The review of the minute book should not be confined to the taxable year under audit but should
cover at least some period immediately before or after. As the Revenue Officer scans the minute
book, he should note appropriate transactions and items of significance, such as contracts entered
into by the taxpayer, stock issuance, dividend declaration and compensation of officers.
3. Partnership Agreement
A copy of the partnership agreement should be obtained and certain provisions affecting partner's
salaries, profit and loss sharing, interest on capital, other allowances and other matters which
may have tax consequences should be noted.
The Revenue Officer should read the auditor's report accompanying the financial statements.
Sometimes, Revenue Officers fail to evaluate the auditor's report. However, there are cases when
auditors do not issue an unqualified opinion. Any qualification or unusual comments in the
auditor's report or certificate such as expression of opinion as to taxpayer's depreciation policy,
inventory and cost valuation, adequacy of reserves, status of collectibility of receivables and the
like should be noted for consideration and should be related to the examination of accounts.
In cases where the auditor issues two reports, one for management and the other for attachment
to the tax return, the former should be studied and compared with the latter. Income and net
worth in both reports may vary from income and net worth per books due to the auditor's
adjusting entries not reflected in the books. Thus, the adjusting entries and supporting documents
should be examined. If needed, the auditor's working papers should be looked into to explain
these entries.
Audits, particularly of large companies, may frequently be simplified and facilitated, if the
examining Revenue Officers are given access to the auditor's working papers. Where necessary,
authorization from the taxpayer or requests for access to said working papers signed by duly
authorized officials shall be secured to be able to scrutinize the working papers of auditors,
particularly the year-end adjustments, intercompany transactions, nature of receivables and other
peculiar accounts.
Certain taxpayers are required to file financial statements and other reports with government
bodies such as the Securities and Exchange Commission for corporate taxpayers, the Garments
and Textile Export Board for-garments exporters, the Board of Investments for exporters, and
other similar government offices. The Revenue Officer should compare the statements filed with
the Bureau of Internal Revenue against those filed with other government offices. Any
discrepancy should be inquired into and material differences should undergo an in-depth
investigation.
7. Appraisal Reports
Appraisal reports, particularly real estate appraisals, are important in many cases such as for
estate tax valuation of properties, capital gains tax verification, and donor's tax investigation.
Another step in understanding the records is to perform a reconciliation of the books with the
return. The following actions are recommended to assist the Revenue Officer in the
reconciliation process:
2.1 Request for a Chart of Accounts and identify account numbers and account titles.
2.4 Ask the taxpayer for the ,tax working papers or any other type of working papers that
were used to prepare the return.
If the working-papers are in the hands of the external auditor, the taxpayer should be advised to
secure a copy thereof from their auditor.
If no working papers are available, request the taxpayer to prepare the reconciliation and
supporting schedules used to arrive at the reconciliation of data as reflected in the books and the
tax returns.
2.5 Evaluate the Statement of Changes in Financial Position, if the taxpayer has one, to
identify sales and purchases of fixed assets, investments made and disposed, loan and debt
payments, capital contributions and other transactions that might not be readily apparent on the
balance sheet and income statement.
The Revenue Officer should establish the level of reliance that can be placed on the books and
records and determine whether the books show all the transactions which occurred.
To accomplish this, a compliance test should be performed on some transactions through the
backward and forward approaches in verification as follows:
3.1 In the backward approach, the figures per tax return are traced to the trial balance, then to
the general ledger, the various journals, and ultimately to the source documents such as sales
invoice or official receipts.
3.2 In the forward approach, the Revenue Officer should select a supporting document, say a
sales invoice, and trace it through the sales journal, general ledger, trial balance and finally to the
tax return.
The backward approach is effective in checking unsupported expenses while the forward
approach is used in uncovering unreported income.
It is important that the Revenue Officer understands adjusting journal entries because tax issues
are frequently discovered in the adjusting journal entries. These adjusting journal entries are
usually accruals, deferrals, corrections or reclassifications of accounts.
4.1 Accruals are normally entries to record certain known and fixed amount of obligations or
liabilities. Accruals are also used to book uncertain,. contingent liabilities. Contingent liabilities
are not fixed in amount or date and are not deductible for tax purposes.
4.2 Deferrals are typically used to defer or postpone recognition of income or expenses. An
inspection of the deferred income account may reflect amounts representing services already
performed. It may also show goods already shipped and received by the customer. In both of
these situations, a deferral of income is not proper.
4.3 Corrections of prior year's earnings, other adjustments and reclassifications are made
through adjusting journal entries which are recorded in the general journal or in the journal
vouchers. Usually, these entries are taken from the auditor's working papers. The examining
Revenue Officer should scrutinize these entries, specially those credited directly to retained
earnings, analyze the tax issues involved, and note down possible tax assessments.
4.4 When scanning adjusting journal entries, the following should also be looked into
closely:
4.4.2 Entries reducing assets as there could possibly be unreported gain on sale, incorrectly
computed gain on sale, incorrectly computed installment sale, non-taxable exchange, or
withdrawal of goods by the owner; and
4.5 Entries increasing liabilities as these could represent fictitious or contingent liabilities,
fictitious expenses, invalid loans to shareholders, or undeclared income credited to liability
accounts.
Internal Control is a system of procedures in place to ensure that all business transactions are
properly recorded and assets are adequately safeguarded.
It is mandatory for the Revenue Officer to evaluate internal control for him to decide up to what
extent the system can be relied upon. This will also determine the nature, extent and timing of
audit tests to be applied in the examination and to plan subsequent audit procedures.
Good internal control assures good record keeping and the inability of the employees and the
owner from misappropriating the assets.
This includes the entity's organizational structure, methods of assigning authority and
responsibility, engagement in related-party transactions and compliance with various laws, rules,
and regulations.
This consists of the methods and records established to capture financial transactions such as
sales, purchases, investments and payment of expenses and liabilities. This element is important
to the Revenue Officer for him to understand how transactions are initiated and recorded and to
determine the degree of reliability to be placed in the taxpayers books and records.
2.3 Control Procedures
These include the adequate use of documents to ensure the proper recording, valuation and
timing of transactions. Reconciliations of accounts should be done periodically and management
should review reports for accuracy and completeness.
To establish the scope of the audit and degree of compliance tests to be performed, internal
control should first be valuated based on the following techniques:
3.1 Identify the personnel responsible for record keeping and determine their responsibilities
and authority in the business operation.
3.2 Reconcile the returns with the books and records. Difficulty in reconciling the return with
the books and records may be an indication of inadequate internal control in either financial or
tax accounting.
3.4 Review the chart of accounts and identify unusual accounts or note those accounts which
should be included but not indicated.
3.5 Secure and study copies of operating manuals or instructional booklets that may lead to
an easy understanding of the taxpayer's business operations.
3.6 Determine if the taxpayer's personal transactions are segregated from business operations
or if separate bank accounts are maintained by the owner and the business.
3.8 Determine the books and records maintained and the frequency of recording transactions.
3.10 Determine the extent of involvement of auditors and other third parties in the business.
3.11 Determine if certified audits for any reason were conducted. If so, copies of documents in
relation thereto should be secured.
3.12 Determine if the income reported by the taxpayer reflects his lifestyle.
The effective evaluation of internal control is dependent upon a very good interview, observation
of the business operation, and testing of the system.
G. Sampling Techniques
Sampling is a large and important part of the examination of a tax return. It is the application of
examination procedures to less than 100% of the items in an account to evaluate its accuracy.
1.2.1 Block Sampling - uses groups of continuous items selected from an account balance or
class of transactions. An example is a Revenue Officer's decision to sample one month of travel
expense to reach a conclusion for the year.
1.2.2 Peso limitation sampling or cut-off sampling - selects a minimum peso amount and
transactions in excess of the said amount are verified.
The extent of sampling to be done is dependent on the degree of internal control. Thus, a small
sample size is required if internal control can be greatly relied upon.
2.3 Materiality
In choosing appropriate material limits, the absolute size of an item, the relative size and the
nature of the business, and industry/business practice should be considered. Materiality of an
item should be related to its tax consequence.
There are many sampling techniques as there are cases. The Revenue Officer is not precluded
from discovering and applying new techniques as may be needed in each particular case.
Listed below are the suggested sampling techniques in testing income statement and balance
sheet items:
3.1 Select the first and last months of sales to ensure that income was not deferred to an
improper year.
3.2 The last month of the period under examination should be tested because of the
likelihood of errors and unallowable adjustments made before the end of the year.
3.3 Selection of the largest three months incurrence of an expense account may reveal
expenses that should be capitalized, personal expenses or padded expenses.
3.4 Scan the cash disbursements journal and general ledger for unusual or very large entries.
This step also familiarizes the Revenue Officer with the accounts, payees, suppliers and clients
of the taxpayer.
3.5 Select at least one month's (or one week for a large corporation) file of cancelled checks.
Thoroughly analyze each check together with the endorsement at the back. This could lead to the
discovery of fictitious; payees, unusual transactions, personal items charged to expense and other
possible disallowances.
3.6 Inspection of the corporate minutes and the articles of incorporation could lead to a
Revenue Officer's determination to sample a particular account.
3.7 Examine certain accounts in the income statement in relation to the balance sheet
accounts. Thus, Accounts Receivable should be analyzed together with Sales. Bad Debts
Expense should be verified together with the Allowance for Bad Debts. Likewise, Accounts
Payable should be examined together with Purchases and other related expenses.
3.8 Test-check source documents and related transactions by considering the persons
involved, nature of the contract, mode of payment and other important aspects.
3.9 Rounded figures should be checked as they may be estimates.
3.11 Contract or limit the scope of the sample if the majority of the samples are completed and
there are still no discrepancies.
4.4. Inspect and observe inventory flow, fixed assets acquired, sales transactions and other
transactions which may require ocular inspection.
Analyzing- the results of a sample is an important yet commonly missed step. The sample taken
should be evaluated and considered in relation to any peculiar situation, such as related -party
transactions or economically unsound transactions. One example would be purchases made at
unusually high or low prices. If the results of the sampling indicates potential tax assessment, an
in-depth analysis should be conducted as follows:
5.1. Verify the account showing the discrepancy or possible source of tax deficiency.
5.5. Take a close look at how the taxpayer handled the entire transaction.
5.7. Discuss the problems or discrepancies with the taxpayer or his authorized representative.
A series of suggestions on the procedures for commencing the examination of tax returns and
appropriate accounting records have already been presented. The initial phase includes a
verification of the net income per books with the reconciling items reflected in the tax return.
After the foregoing process, the Revenue Officer should turn his attention primarily to the books
and records bearing in mind that there are some reconciling items which affect the net income
per books.
The following discussion offer guides and techniques in examining asset, liability and net worth
accounts. The Revenue Officer, however, is not precluded from applying other techniques which
are deemed necessary in a particular case.
1. Compare deposits shown in the bank statement against entries in the cash receipts book
and official receipts. .Note down any unrecorded or unreceipted deposit and investigate the
source.
2. Test check cash sales with the cash receipts book if they have been correctly recorded.
Also check cash sales made at the beginning and end of the period under examination to
determine if year-end sales have been recorded in the proper accounting period.
3. Investigate entries in the general ledger cash account. Look for unusual items which do
not originate from cash receipts or disbursements journals. These entries may indicate
unauthorized withdrawals or expenditures, sales of capital assets, omitted sales, undisclosed bank
accounts, etc.
4. Review cash receipts journal for items not identified with ordinary business sales, being
alert to such items as sale of assets, miscellaneous income, sale of scrap, income received in
advance, proceeds from issuance of capital stock and other taxable transactions.
5. Review cash on hand and cash in bank accounts to determine if there are any credit
balances during the period under examination. This may indicate unrecorded receipts.
6. Review cash disbursements journal for a representative period. Note any missing check
numbers, checks payable to cash, large or unusual items and determine propriety thereof through
a comparison with vouchers, journal entries and other related accounting records.
7. If the taxpayer is on cash basis, ascertain if checks were written and recorded at the close
of the period under audit but were issued thereafter. Verify checks issued during the latter part of
the year to check the authenticity of expenses claimed.
8. Give special consideration to checks issued for cashier's checks, sight drafts and other
similar bank instruments where the payees and nature of the disbursements are clearly shown.
9. Obtain bank statements and cancelled checks for each bank account for one or more
months, including the last month of the period under examination.
10. Note year-end bank overdrafts. This may indicate expenses which are fictitious or
unallowable since funds were not available for payment.
11. Determine if there are checks which have remained outstanding for an unreasonable
period of time. This may indicate improper, fictitious or duplication of disbursements. Old
outstanding checks could possibly be restored to income.
12. Determine whether voided checks have been properly adjusted in the books and credited
to the appropriate expense accounts, if applicable.
13. For a test period, check endorsements to verify if they are the same as that of the payees',
noting any endorsements by the owner, or any questionable endorsement.
14. If records appear unreliable or have not been subjected to a competent independent audit,
tests of footings and postings should be made for a representative period.
15. Test check disbursements from petty cash to determine if there are any unallowable items
included.
16. Scrutinize cash overages and shortages, being alert to occurrence of irregularities.
17. Tally debits and credits to the cash accounts per month against sales credit, debts to
purchases and expense accounts and other sources and application of cash based on the
worksheet of real and nominal accounts submitted by the taxpayer. Note down discrepancies and
substantial accumulation of cash without reasonable credits.
2. Check entries in the general ledger control accounts. Look for unusual items, especially
those which do not originate from the sales or cash receipts journals.
3. Determine if subsidiary ledgers are in agreement with control accounts, and if not,
ascertain the reasons for any differences.
4. Note any credit balances in the general ledger or subsidiary accounts. This may indicate
deposits or overpayments which could be considered as additional income or unrecorded sales.
Also, credit balances may indicate a misapplied bad debt recovery or deposits received for so
long a time that there is little likelihood that they will ever be refunded. Whatever the cause, the
credits, if material, should be isolated for consideration.
5. Some credit sales invoices and postings should be test checked from the sales journal to
the subsidiary and control account.
6. Compare balances of accounts receivable and sales for the current year with that of the
preceding year. Investigate significant changes.
8. In case of notes receivable, determine whether accrued income on interest bearing notes
or accounts has been included in income.
9. Investigate the sources of notes receivable as there may be instances when the taxpayer
has other sources of income other than his regular business.
10. Determine whether accrued income on interest bearing notes or accounts has been
included in income.
11. If needed, check the detailed listing of beginning receivables to cash collected as
reflected in the cash receipts book. This may disclose diversion of funds and other irregularities.
1. Ascertain the company's policy of providing for allowance for bad debts by examining
minutes of meetings and other documents.
2. Compare balances in the allowance account with that of the preceding year's. Investigate
significant changes.
3. Evaluate the reasonableness of the allowance by computing the ratio of the balance of
allowance for bad debts to the trade accounts receivable balance.
4. Compute the ratio of bad debts expense over sales. Analyze if such is reasonable.
6. For accounts written off which were charged to expense, examine minute book for
authorization to write off accounts.
7. Ascertain that accounts written off are worthless by examining supporting documents
such as reports of collection agencies, correspondence with said customers and documents filed
in court, and court decisions on collection cases.
8. If possible, check the financial status of the customers for which allowance for bad debts
was provided.
9. Check entries to the allowance account for possible bad debts recoveries and trace if the
same were declared as income at the time of recovery.
D. Inventories
1. Determine the correct cost components to be included in the inventory. The costs used in
determining inventory depend on whether the business is of a service, merchandising or
manufacturing nature.
2. Verify the inventory valuation method being applied if such is acceptable for tax
purposes and consistently applied from year to year.
3. Compare inventory balances in the return under examination with the balances on the
prior and subsequent year's returns and financial statement; then verify these with the taxpayer's
records.
4. Check BIR authorization for changes in inventory valuation method and verify taxpayers
compliance with the requirements set forth under existing rules and regulations.
5. Check gross profit percentage variations. Conduct in-depth verification of items with
substantial variations.
7. Determine the taxpayer's computation of standard rates, if standard rates are applied.
8. Verify cost of production reports and test check certain costs reflected therein to
supporting documents.
10. Analyze unusual entries to cost of sales account such as materials, labor and overhead
charges not directly related to sales or transfers of finished goods, if applicable.
11. Determine if there have been write-downs for "excess" inventory to below cost. Verify
authorization and supporting document/report for such write-downs.
12. When items have been removed from inventory for the owners' or shareholders' use,
check if these are properly recorded as part of sales. These required minimum audit procedures,
however, should not deter the Revenue Officer from making a more detailed examination of the
inventory account, when warranted.
E. Advances To Stockholders/Officers
This receivable account may represent an outright advance of money by the corporation to
officers and/or stockholders.
Usually, these advances vary in amounts over a period of time, consequently building up the
current amount. The following verification procedures on this account should be conducted, if
warranted:
1. Verify authorization from Board of Directors for advances and loans to stockholders and
officers by checking duly approved minutes of meetings.
2. Identify company officers and stockholders who are granted advances regularly.
3. Check payments of advances to the company if such loan re-payments earned interest for
which no withholding tax was deducted.
4. Verify entries and supporting documents on cancellation of advances if the same do not
originate from cash receipts.
F. Investment
The investments most commonly found on the books are stocks and bonds and, in some cases,
real estate not used in actual business operations. The following procedures should be conducted
in the examination of investments if such are material assets of the taxpayer:
1. Familiarize with the nature of investments, utilizing any records maintained by the
taxpayers such as the investment ledgers, worksheets showing the breakdown of investments and
other investment records.
2. Analyze sales and other credit entries to the account. If stocks sold are listed in the stock
market, test check selling price of stocks sold at the prevailing "close" price at the Philippine
Stock Exchange during the date of sale. Real properties sold should not fall below fair market
value and/or zonal value where the zonal value has been established. The application of the
"whichever is higher" rule shall be observed.
3. Verify journal entries to ascertain the selling price and gain on sale of investments.
Vouch supporting documents such as deeds of sale, proof of remittance of taxes withheld,
payment of documentary stamp tax and other relevant records.
4. Investigate sales to related parties and/or officers or stockholders below fair market
value.
5. Cross-check all investments during the year to the interest, dividend or rental income
accounts.
G. Depreciable Assets
This group includes tangible properties of relatively long life which are used in the operation of
the business. However, natural resources such as oil or mineral lands are not included in this
group of asset account. The following verification procedures should be undertaken on these
accounts:
1. Compare the asset and related reserve amounts as they appear on the tax return, balance
sheet, depreciation schedule, and taxpayer's books and schedules. Compare the beginning and
ending figures for the taxable year and reconcile differences or ask the taxpayer to make the
necessary reconciliation. Verify the correctness of such reconciliation.
3. Review asset additions during the year by reference to invoices, contracts and other
documents and determine if the proper cost basis was used.
3.1. Note items which appear to have originated from unusual sources such as appraisal
increases, transfers and exchanges, and determine propriety thereof. Ascertain if prior earnings
were adequate to cover acquisitions.
3.2. Determine if acquisition and installation costs of fixed assets and leasehold
improvements have been capitalized.
3.3. Ascertain if assets include items of a personal nature. If the assets are used by the officers
for their personal use, the depreciation should be disallowed.
3.4. Where construction or any other work of a capital nature is performed with the taxpayer's
own labor, equipment and other assets for its own use, be certain that the basis of such asset
includes materials, labor and overhead including depreciation.
3.5. With regard to the basis of recognition of costs of assets, consider such items as trade-ins,
acquisitions from related taxpayers, allocation of cost between land and building and other basis.
4. Decreases in the asset accounts during the year should be noted. The accuracy of the
gains or losses resulting therefrom should be verified and ascertain that the appropriate tax on the
transaction, such as value-added tax, if applicable, has been paid.
5. Ascertain if the taxpayer has transferred assets to the owner, officers, stockholders or to a
controlled domestic or foreign corporation for less than fair or adequate consideration.
1. Review the nature and source of all accounts and ascertain if they are being used to claim
unallowable deductions.
2. With regard to depreciation, determine the correctness of the amount of asset being
depreciated. No depreciation is allowable on the appraisal increase of fixed assets. Any
foreseeable salvage value is to be deducted from the cost of the asset in determining the basis of
depreciation.
2.2. Where land and building are acquired on lump-sum, the following formula should be
used in computing the building cost for depreciation computation:
3. Ascertain the taxpayer's depreciation and amortization policies and consider the
following:
3.1. Whether the methods applied by the taxpayer are in compliance with the Tax Code and
existing revenue regulations;
3.2. Whether the depreciation rates used by the taxpayer are fair and reasonable; and
3.3. Whether the taxpayer has applied the same method consistently from period to period.
4. Check authorization from minutes of meetings, fixed asset reports, or other supporting
documents on credits for allowance for obsolescence and/or asset write-offs. If necessary, inspect
assets claimed as obsolete and/or written off.
I. Intangible Assets
1. Investigate the nature of the intangible assets whether leases, patents, licenses,
trademarks, goodwill, copyright, franchise and others.
2. Costs of acquiring the intangible should be capitalized when useful lives can be
estimated. If not, no amortization is allowable for tax purposes.
3. Determine if the recorded cost and cost of current additions includes proper elements
such as legal fees, application fees and other costs of acquisition. Examine contracts and other
legal documents.
4.1. Leasehold costs are subject to amortization over the term of the lease.
4.3. Research and development expenditures may either be capitalized or treated as outright
deductible expense.
4.4. Patents sold with the exclusive right to make, use and sell an article constitutes ordinary
income.
4.5. Organization expenses are subject to amortization and are not deductible in full on the
year incurred. Check the reasonableness of the taxpayer's amortization policy on organization
expense.
5. Determine if there have been transactions with related taxpayers. If so, verify if these are
made at arms-length.
7. Analyze any transaction involving transfer of foreign rights to any foreign entity for an
equity interest or for nominal consideration.
8. Be alert to transactions which could have given rise to intangibles classifiable as asset
account which may have been recorded as expense.
1. Verify the nature and source of these assets and the manner in which they are charged off
to expense.
2. When prepaid expenses are not reflected in the balance sheet, verify charges to expenses
which entail advance payments such as insurance, rent, supplies, repairs and maintenance that
are covered by contracts.
K. Other Assets
2. Investigate sources of charges to the account. Verify entries and supporting documents to
check if the other assets are results of income-generating activities not reported in the financial
statements.
1. Obtain a schedule to determine the nature and purpose of the account if significant in
amount.
2. Test check debit and credit entries, being aware of the possibility that such account may
be used as a means for diverting sales, padding expenses, and concealing other irregularities.
1. Reconcile subsidiary ledgers with the control accounts. Request the taxpayer for
explanation of any discrepancies noted.
2. Note existence of debit balances in the general ledger or subsidiary accounts. This may
indicate diversion of funds and other underdeclaration of income.
3. Note accounts which have long overdue balances. These may indicate contested liabilities
or accounts that no longer exist such as unclaimed wages or unclaimed deposits which should be
reverted to income.
N. Fixed Liabilities
3. When the liability is secured by property pledged or mortgaged as collateral for the loan,
determine if the property pledged/mortgaged is income producing. Review the terms and
conditions stipulated on the loan agreement to determine if income derived therefrom remains to
be reported by the taxpayer as the borrower.
4. Verify if funds were borrowed for use of affiliates as the interest expenses thereon shall
not be deductible on the part of the borrowing taxpayer. There should be a reallocation of profits
and the tax burden must be shifted to the affiliate in accordance with existing rules and
regulations.
5. Determine whether the indebtedness will give rise to interest expense that are subject to
limitations on deductibility under Section 34(B) of the Tax Code. Determine if loans were
borrowed to finance acquisition of tax-exempt securities. If so, the interest expense is not
considered deductible for income tax purposes.
O. Deferred Credits
1. Check all payments received as recorded in the cash receipts book, (i.e. date of receipt,
source of collection, and other entries).
2. Check if collections were included in the gross income during the year when the
payments were actually received. Amounts are generally includible in gross income for tax
purposes not later than the time of receipt if they are subject to free and unrestricted use by the
taxpayer. Under this theory, collections, advance rentals, legal retainer and the like, advance
sales of transportations tokens or communications tickets and other advances are income when
received.
3. Look for credit balance of accounts which fall under deferred credits. They may be
clearly labeled as advanced rentals, deferred service income or may be shown as a reserve
account that is mixed with true liability accounts, or as a contra-balance in the receivables.
4. If the taxpayer used the completed contract method of accounting for contracts entered
into and construction work that actually commenced prior to January 1, 1998, income and
expenses attributable to a particular job or project are properly deferred until completion of the
project. The contracts and progress reports should be inspected to determine whether the
reporting of income has been delayed beyond the completion of the project.
5. When a taxpayer uses the installment method of reporting income, the unrecognized gain
for tax purposes should be recorded as a deferred credit. This particular account should be
checked to determine if the year-end balance remaining in the account reconciles with gross
profit to be reported on the subsequent payments. Any difference would indicate erroneous
computations of income from payments.
2. Check the financial statements of the corporation as well as that of the shareholders. If
there is an interest expense account on the part of the corporation from such loan, there should
also be a corresponding interest income account on the part of the shareholder.
There are certain tax advantages to the corporation or shareholder for an equity investment to be
treated as a loan. Be sure that the taxpayer gets these benefits only when the facts of the case
show that a "true loan" exists.
If "loans" are found to be equity capital, the following procedures may be applied:
2.1. Disallow claim for interest expense and treat payments during the year as dividends.
2.2. Treat loan repayments as dividends.
3. Check supporting loan documents issued in favor of the shareholders, officers or owners.
If unsupported or if support is doubtful, the unsupported income may have been lodged in this
account.
4. Verify certain payments of loans against check vouchers and cancelled checks.
5. Verify the debit and credit entries in the general ledger account and watch out for unusual
sources other than the cash receipts and disbursements book.
6. Examine adjustments, specially increases in the account, at the end of the year as this
may constitute shifting of taxable income to this liability account. Verify general journal entries,
journal vouchers and related documents supporting the entries.
Q. Capital Accounts
1.1. Reconcile amount appearing on the books, tax return and financial statements. Verify
discrepancies, if any.
1.2. Review debits and credits to the account during the period under audit and check
supporting entries to the account. Increases which originate from sources other than profit and
loss may indicate omitted income.
1.3 Relate the account balance and withdrawals with the owner's standard of living. Where
owners report no other sources of income, and withdrawals appear insufficient to maintain
personal living expenses, there may be under reporting or diversion of income.
2.1. Review debits and credits to the account during the period under audit. Verify increases
and decreases and check for unusual sources other than profit and loss.
2.2. Reconcile amount appearing on the tax return, books and financial statements. Verify any
differences noted.
2.4. Ascertain that the correct tax has been withheld on distribution of partnership profits.
2.5. If the taxpayer claims that it is a general professional partnership, examine partnership
contract and registration with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
3.1.1. Review entries in the capital stock account and verify increases and decreases thereto.
3.1.2. Verify correctness of all items appearing on the return, books and financial statements.
Investigate discrepancies, if any.
3.1.3. In case of additions to capital stock out of new issues during the period under audit,
ascertain that the correct amount of documentary stamp tax has been paid. Secure a photocopy of
the proof of payment.
3.1.4. Compare data from minute book with items recorded on the books of accounts to
determine if entries have been made.
3.1.5. Determine if expenses relating to stock issuance (i.e. legal fees, registration fees, broker's
commission and other expenses) have been properly handled.
3.1.6. Determine during the examination of a recapitalization of the stock in a closely held
company, if the fair market value of the stock to be received by each exchanging shareholder is
equal to the fair market value of the stock surrendered in the exchange. If there is a significant
difference, consider the possibility of treating the difference as a donation subject to donor's tax.
3.1.7.4 Notes of pertinent information from the correspondence file with other parties to the
reorganization.
3.1.9. Determine if the increase in capital stock is the direct consequence of an exchange of
property under Section 40(C)(2) of the Tax Code. If so, confirm compliance with the conditions
set for the non-recognition of gain or loss by performing the following audit procedures:
3.1.9.1.2 Check if the income tax return filed for the taxable year in which the exchange
took place incorporated all facts pertinent to the non-recognition of gain or loss upon such
exchange, such as:
3.1.9.1.2.1 The historical cost or other basis of valuation of all properties, including all stocks
or securities transferred incident to the plan; and
3.1.9.1.2.2 The nature and amount of liability assumed upon the exchange and the amount
and nature of any liabilities to which any of the property acquired in the exchange is subject.
3.1.9.1.2.4 Check in the required documentary stamp tax has been paid.
3.1.9.2.1 Verify if the transferor and the transferee filed an income tax return for the
taxable year in which the exchange was consummated with a complete statement of all facts
pertinent to the exchange.
3.1.9.2.3 Determine if transferor of the property gains control of said corporation, alone or
together with others, not exceeding four (4) persons, pursuant to Sec. 40 (C)(2) of the NIRC.
3.1.9.3 In both cases, ascertain if the following information have been annotated at the back of
the Transfer Certificates of Title or certificates of stock:
3.1.9.3.3 The fact that no gain or loss was recognized as a result of such exchange.
The investigation of the retained earnings (or deficit, in case of accumulated losses) is a very
important part of the audit process as this is related to the net worth method of investigation. It is
the account to which the net income or net loss from operations is transferred and accumulated
into. The minimum audit procedures that should be undertaken in analyzing this account are as
follows:
3.2.1. Compare the amount of earnings retained in the business as shown on the return,
financial statements, books of accounts and the schedule of reconciliation of net income per
books and per return. Verify differences, if any.
3.2.2. Verify correctness of all items, both increases and decreases, appearing on the books or
return. Trace beginning balance of retained earnings to the ending balance appearing in the
balance sheet of the prior period.
3.2.3. Check increases which do not originate from net income. Verify entries from the general
journal/journal vouchers, specially those recorded other than as year-end adjustment as these
may indicate sales or income directly posted to the retained earnings account.
3.2.4. Determine if declared and unpaid dividends are properly recorded. Compare paid
dividends to the minutes of the Board of Directors meeting(s).
3.2.5. For taxpayers incurring continuous losses and deficit balance, investigate the real status
of the business. Tour company premises, evaluate the volume of business, and compare the
information gathered with the financial data reported. There may be underreporting of sales as
there is very little reason for a business to exist if it is continuously incurring losses.
3.2.6. Examine supporting documents and authorization for all other debit and credit
transactions in retained earnings to determine conformity with existing tax laws and regulations.
This Chapter discusses the books of accounts, accounting records and documents used to record
income and expense transactions. It enumerates the audit procedures and techniques for income
and expenses.
The audit of income or revenues are applicable to resident and non-resident individuals engaged
in business and the practice of profession, estates and trusts engaged in trade or business, general
professional and business partnerships and corporations.
Expenses chargeable against income are allowable in their entirety only for business partnerships
and corporations. Self-employed resident citizens and aliens engaged in business or the practice
of profession, non-resident aliens engaged in business, estates and trusts engaged in trade or
business and general professional partnerships as defined under Section 22 (B) of the Tax Code
and their individual partners can claim expenses subject to the provisions of Section 34 of the
Tax Code.
The subsequent discussions on the procedures and techniques in the investigation of income and
expense accounts are general audit guides. The Revenue Officer should not be hindered in
applying additional procedures and techniques, which he deems necessary, based on his initial
findings, evaluation of internal control, reliability of accounting records, and analytical review of
operations.
1. Sales
1.1 Review the taxpayer's accounting method of revenue recognition if the same is acceptable
and consistent with prior years.
1.2 Ascertain that all sales were reported as of the cut-off date. Cut-off refers to the point at
which entries from one accounting period stop and entries for the next period begin. This is
usually the last day of a taxable year. If the last day of the taxable year is not used, the cut-off
date must be the last day of the taxpayer's fiscal period.
1.3 Verify revenues/sales recorded and deposited near the end of the tax year and
immediately during the subsequent month to determine if these pertain to income earned for the
tax year under examination.
1.4 Account for all sales invoices issued. Match delivery receipts, gate passes, if any, against
sales invoices issued.
1.5 Compare totals of sales invoices, sales summary, entries in subsidiary sales journals and
general ledger accounts. Inquire and investigate discrepancies between book entries and returns
filed.
1.6 Reconcile credits to sales with debits to accounts receivable and debits to cash receipts
book. Test check monthly entries.
1.7 Research unusual and unfamiliar issuances of goods or goods which are not normally
sold by the taxpayer.
1.8 Conduct interviews to secure information regarding the taxpayer's business, financial
history, number of employees and other information which may lead to sales estimation.
1.10 Determine if merchandise is being withdrawn for personal use or for any other purpose
not in relation to normal sales process.
1.11 Scan credit memo issued to customers and test check entries to Sales Returns &
Allowances and Sales Discounts to insure proper recording of credits.
1.12 Verify cancelled sales invoices by test checking deposits made and withdrawal of goods
on the day of cancellation.
1.13 Tour the business premises to obtain information on:
a. Sales volume
b. Volume of sales return and method of handling sales returns
c. Major products
d. Other by-products and scrap sales, if any
e. Equipment used in operation
f. Nature, quality and size of facilities
g. Inventory level
In touring the premises, be observant and ask questions that will disclose significant facts and
information relative to the taxpayer's business operations.
1.14 Review sales contracts, consignment agreements and other documents relative to sales.
1.15 On installment sales, ascertain that collections have been properly segregated as to the
year of sales and that the proper gross profit ratios have been applied. Review unearned or
deferred income accounts for any uncollected balances which have been outstanding for an
unreasonable period of time.
1.16 Determine whether sales on consigned goods are taken up at the time of shipment or after
sixty (60) days from the date goods were consigned.
1.17 Where the internal control is weak and records are unreliable or inadequate, apply other
approaches to audit revenue such as cash analysis, net-worth analysis, third party verification,
and other indirect approaches to investigation.
2. Rent Income
2.2 Conduct ocular inspection of the premises under lease. Identify tenants and monthly or
annual rentals. Conduct interviews, if necessary.
2.3 Relate real properties under lease agreement to assets declared in the balance sheet. Note
inconsistencies between asset values and income generated.
2.4 Where the rental income is based on a percentage of sales of the lessee, the sales of the
lessee should be tested for a representative period, say one month, to get a proper approximation
of the lessee's sales during the taxable year under audit and the rental income received by the
lessor. In such cases, proper authorization from the lessee should be obtained before conducting
the test verification.
2.5 Obtain information on rental of neighboring properties and compare with rent income
reported.
2.6 Examine official receipts issued. Compare total collections per official receipts with
entries in the cash receipts book and general ledger. Investigate discrepancies.
2.7 Ascertain acceptability and consistency of accounting methods used. For cash-basis
taxpayers, prepaid rent and rental deposits constitute income during the year of receipt.
2.8 Secure copies of lease contracts or agreements. Take note of lease contracts which are
actually conditional sales.
2.9 Where necessary, obtain copies of Transfer Certificates of Title, tax declarations, mayor's
or municipal permits, and real property tax receipts to determine properties which may be
undisclosed/unrecorded by the taxpayer.
3. Professional Fees
3.1 Determine the taxpayer's accounting method of recognizing income, whether cash or
accrual. Most professionals, however, adopt the cash basis of accounting.
3.3 Compare income reported on the tax return with the books of accounts, creditable
withholding tax forms, financial statements and official receipts issued. Verify discrepancies,
noted, if any.
3.4 Account for official receipts issued. Note any missing receipt or break in the series and
investigate the reasons therefor.
3.7 Relate the income reported per tax return to the lifestyle and assets of the taxpayer. If the
taxpayer's assets and estimated costs of living expenses are beyond the income earned, verify and
compute for possible underdeclaration of income by using the net worth method of investigation.
4.1 Identify in the tax returns and financial statements any sale, exchange or disposal of
assets other than inventories or stocks in trade.
4.2 Obtain copies of deeds of sale and other documents relating to the sale.
4.3 Determine zonal values, fair market values or appraisal values and compare with the
actual selling price.
4.4 Compute any underdeclaration of sales by comparing the selling price with the existing
fair market value, zonal value or value of similar properties sold.
4.5 In case of disposal of capital assets, ascertain compliance with the provisions of the Tax
Code on capital gains and losses.
4.6 Verify sales of property reported on the installment basis and determine if all
requirements pertaining thereto have been complied with.
4.7 Determine if proper accounting for depreciation, book value and salvage value was
correctly taken up
4.8 Inquire from certain company personnel on possible sales of assets which may not have
been recorded in the books of accounts.
5. Other Income
5.1 Scrutinize the entries in the general ledger and general journal for any other income or
other receivables recorded thereto.
5.2 Test check entries in intercompany accounts to determine whether shifting of income or
management fees may have been made and charged to affiliates.
5.3 Investigate suspense accounts and unusual liability accounts, such as due to affiliates/due
to stockholders and other payables to uncover possible income not recorded in the income
accounts.
1. Purchases
For taxpayers engaged in trading and manufacturing businesses, the purchase account is one of
the largest accounts in the income statement. Thus, there is a possibility that taxpayers may hide
a number of non-deductible expenditures in this account due to the volume of transactions posted
to it. The following audit procedures should be followed in examining purchases:
1.1 Account for all purchase invoices and receiving reports as of the cut-off date. Determine
if year-end purchases have been recorded in the proper accounting period.
1.2 Compare totals of purchases in the return, income statement, purchase book, subsidiary
purchases book, if any, and general ledger. Determine any discrepancy and investigate its nature
as well as the nature of year-end adjustments.
1.3 Determine that the purchases declared are neither overstated nor understated by vouching
the supporting documents, and test-checking the footings of invoices, purchase books and ledger
accounts Under-statement of purchases may also mean underdeclared sales.
1.4 Tour the premises where inventory items are kept and correlate actual inventory level
against purchases reported. Test-check stock cards of major inventory items to evaluate accuracy
of inventory reports.
1.5 Scan the purchases book for possible unusual payees or unusual amount of purchases.
Take note of suppliers not generally associated with the products or services handled by the
taxpayer.
1.6 Verify entries in the general ledger account which originate from unusual sources such as
journal entries, debit and credit memoranda and other accounting records.
1.7 Test check recorded purchases for a representative period with suppliers invoices and
cancelled checks. Note if there are personal expenditures, withdrawals of merchandise by the
owners, fictitious or duplicate invoices, cancelled purchase invoices, excessive rebates, discounts
and allowances and purchases not received.
1.8 Where there are only a few major suppliers, conduct third party verification to ascertain
the correctness of purchases declared, if there is suspicion of fraud or if the Revenue Officer
believes that this is necessary.
1.9 If purchases are from suppliers related to the owners or from affiliates, conduct a review
of a number of transactions to uncover prices in excess of market value, excessive rebates and
allowances, and other similar schemes.
2.1 Verify the inventory valuation method applied by the taxpayer whether first-in, first-out
(FIFO) last-in, first-out (LIFO), specific identification, weighted average or simple average.
Last-in, first-out is not acceptable for income tax purposes. Determine consistency of its
application from year to year.
2.2 Obtain an understanding of the production process thru familiarization with the taxpayer's
business, tour of the premises, conducting interviews, and analyzing cost of production reports.
2.3 Compare inventory balances in the return under examination with the balances for the
prior and subsequent years' returns, and reconcile these with the general ledger and the physical
inventory summary.
2.4 Check unauthorized changes in inventory valuation method from period to period.
Conduct test-checking of inventory valuation of sample inventory items from the summary
inventory sheets and determine if the taxpayer has not improperly valued any inventory item.
2.5 Check gross profit variations. Any significant variation should be discussed with the
taxpayer and a reasonable explanation in writing should be obtained. A material decrease in
gross profit from one year to the next could be due to understated ending inventory.
2.6 Determine the significance of notes or qualifying statements on financial reports prepared
by external auditors. Any unusual comments or qualifying statements about the inventories or
cost of sales that have a material tax effect should
be discussed with the taxpayer and, if necessary, with a representative of the external auditor.
2.7 If the taxpayer applies standard or predetermined cost in costing goods manufactured,
inspect the working papers and production report used to calculate the cost per unit and ensure
that expenses included are allowable.
2.8 Analyze unusual entries to cost of sales. Account for labor, materials and overhead
charges not directly related to sales or transfers of finished goods. Be alert on the possibility that
the taxpayer may be trying to include a non-deductible item in the cost of sales account.
2.9 Determine whether year-end purchases are included in closing inventory. Review
purchase invoices at the last month of the taxable year under audit. Compare quantities on the
inventory summary for classes of goods purchased with the quantity in the ending inventory list
and quantity of sales recorded at year-end for such goods. Thus, if a specific item or a certain
quantity of goods were purchased on the last day of the year, it should be included in the ending
inventory unless sold that same day.
2.10 Determine reductions in ending inventory values by reviewing authorization for write-
downs and provision for obsolescence or decline in market values. Check minutes of meetings
for such authorization. Analyze journal entries for the write-down or provision of allowance for
obsolescence/decline in value. Check itemized inventory summary sheet and test-check the list
with actual physical inventory.
3.1 Evaluate the expense initially by comparing the ratio of salaries and wages to sales and
the percentage of taxes withheld to total salaries, allowances bonuses and other compensation.
Low ratios might indicate that the company hires sub-contractors or an understatement of
expenses which may be a lead to underdeclared sales. High ratios may also mean an
understatement of sales or padded payroll with functions or terminated employees.
3.2 Review payroll sheets. All expenses claimed having the semblance of a compensation
payment should be verified together.
3.3 Interview personnel assigned to prepare payroll and inquire if family members are
included in the payroll. If so, check legitimacy of the work assignment and reasonableness of
compensation paid.
3.4 Compare payroll costs with industry standards and other independent data. Require
explanations for significant deviations.
3.5 Observe the actual number of employees and relate this to the declared sales. Inquire if
independent contractors are hired in lieu of regular employees.
3.6 Perform a comparative analysis of salaries, wages and other employee benefits with prior
and subsequent years. Material changes may indicate a change in the volume of business or in
the policy of classifying manpower employed.
3.7 Determine if the taxpayer is properly withholding the correct amount of taxes on
compensation by test-checking actual pay slips against employee records and BIR Form 1604 CF
(Annual Alpha List of Employees from whom Withholding Tax has been deducted).
3.8 Reconcile totals of wages paid which were subjected to withholding tax and totals of
compensation paid which were not subjected to withholding tax with payroll expense claimed.
Consider the possibility of disallowing any noted discrepancy in accordance with existing rules
and regulations.
3.9 Verify Social Security System Premium Remittance List to cross check the list of
employees to whom compensation was paid.
4. Fringe Benefits
Fringe benefits tax is a final withholding tax imposed on the grossed-up monetary value of fringe
benefits furnished, granted or paid by the employer to the employee, except rank and file
employees as defined in Revenue Regulations No. 3-98.
4.1 Obtain a list of managerial and supervisory employees from the Human Resource or
Personnel Department of the company being audited with the following information per
personnel:
a. Nationality
b. Citizenship
c. Number of years with the company
d. Position/Job designation
e. Basic salary and allowances
f. Other compensation and benefits
4.2 Secure copies of employment contracts and/or appointment papers and examine these
documents to verify the nature and amount of other compensation, allowances and benefits
which may be subject to fringe benefits tax.
4.3 Analyze expenses and other pertinent accounts where fringe benefits may have been
lodged or recorded. Determine the amounts of benefits subject to the tax.
4.3.1 Include the value of following items/services as taxable fringe benefits pursuant to Sec.
2.33 (B) of Revenue Regulations No. 3-98:
a. Housing
b. Expense Account
c. Vehicle of any kind
d. Household personnel, such as maid, driver and others
e. Interest on loan at less than market rate to the extent of the difference between the market
rate and actual rate granted
f. Membership fees, dues and other expenses borne by the employer for the employee in
social and athletic clubs or other similar organizations
g. Expenses for foreign travel
h. Holiday and vacation expenses
i. Educational assistance to the employee or his dependents
j. Life or health insurance and other non-life insurance premiums or similar amounts in
excess of allowable amount under the law.
4.3.2 Exclude the following fringe benefits from the fringe benefits subject to FBT (Sec.
2.3.3.(c) of RR No. 3-98):
a. Fringe benefits which are authorized and exempted from tax under the Tax Code or under
any special law
b. Contributions of the employer for the benefit of the employee to retirement, insurance
and hospitalization benefit plans
c. Benefits given to the rank and file, whether or not granted under a collective bargaining
agreement.
d.1 Monetized unused vacation leave credits of employees not exceeding ten (10) days
during the year
d.2 Medical cash allowance to dependents of employees not exceeding P750 per semester or
P125 per month
d.3 Rice subsidy of P350 per month granted by an employer to his employees
d.7 Employee achievement awards (e.g. for the length of service or safety achievement)
which must be in the form of a tangible personal property other than cash or gift certificate, with
an annual monetary value not exceeding one-half (1/2) month of the basic salary of the employee
receiving the award under an established written plan which does not discriminate in favor of
highly paid employees
d.8 Christmas and major anniversary celebrations for employees and their guests
d.9 Company picnics and sports tournament in the Philippines and are participated
exclusively by employees
d.10 Flowers, fruits, books or similar items given to employees under special circumstances
(e.g. on account of illness, marriage, birth of a baby, etc.).
e. If the grant of the fringe benefits is for the convenience of the employer
4.4 Determine the correct valuation of fringe benefits based on the provisions on valuation
prescribed and illustrated in RR No. 3-98
4.5 Compute for the amount of taxable fringe benefits by dividing the monetary value of the
fringe benefit by the appropriate percentages in accordance with the following schedule:
4.6 Compute for the correct final withholding tax on fringe benefits by multiplying the
grossed-up monetary value of the benefits with the following rates for the applicable taxable
years:
1998 - 34%
1999 - 35%
2000 - 32%
The following are subject to different tax rates as provided by the NIRC and RR No. 3-98:
a. A non-resident alien individual not engaged in trade or business within the Philippines
(Section 25 (B))
4.7 Examine monthly final withholding tax returns with corresponding official receipts of
payment to check if the correct final withholding tax on fringe benefits was paid. In case of
underpayment or late payment, compute the deficiency tax due and/or penalties, where
applicable.
4.8 Compare the amount of fringe benefits per income tax return, audited financial
statements and per books against the withholding tax returns and official receipts. If the taxpayer
is on accrual basis, examine the journal entry made in accruing the expense at the end of the
year. Verify if the tax has been paid on or before the due date on the first month of the following
year.
4.9 Disallow claims for fringe benefits in excess of supported amounts or where the payees
are determined to be fictitious.
5. Rents
5.1 Verify pertinent provisions of the lease contract with the lessor.
5.2 Verify reasonableness of rentals paid by the lessee, particularly if the lessor is related
directly to the taxpayer.
5.3 Verify whether the corporation is renting property for which it has no actual business use.
Any rentals in that case would be unreasonable and unnecessary; hence, the expense should be
disallowed.
5.4 Determine the terms of the lease. If the lessee may take or acquire title to the property,
the claim for rental expense should be disallowed.
5.5 Determine if there are any capital expenditures included in the accounts.
5.6 Determine whether the proper amount of expanded withholding tax on rental payments
has been withheld and remitted.
6. Royalties
6.1 Verify minute book and pertinent provisions of the contract with the lessor.
6.2 Check correctness of the amount of the expense by computing the percentage of royalty
or terms specified in the contract in relation to the reported sales. Disallow excess claim.
6.3 Determine whether the proper amount of final withholding tax has been withheld and
remitted.
6.4 If the recipient is a non-resident alien or foreign entity, determine whether the proper
amount of tax has been withheld and remitted.
6.4.1 Check whether the recipient is a treaty country resident. If so, ask for a copy of a ruling
issued for the use of the preferential tax rate.
6.4.2 If a copy of a ruling has been produced, verify from the issuing office [International Tax
Affairs Division (ITAD) or Law Division] for the authenticity of such ruling.
6.4.3 If the recipient is a non-treaty country resident, verify if the appropriate tax rate provided
for in the Tax Code is properly applied.
7. Interest
7.1 Verify sources of interest expenses such as actual notes, loans, mortgage or bond
instruments. Check whether the indebtedness is business related.
7.2 Determine the accounting method used by the taxpayer. If he uses accrual basis, only the
interest accruing during the taxable year is deductible.
7.3 Determine if interest paid or accrued applies to obligations due to related taxpayers.
Consider such items as:
b. Accrual of items payable to related taxpayers which are not paid within the prescribed
time limit.
7.4 Determine if deductions claimed relate to interest incurred in carrying tax free
obligations. If so, then the interest claimed is not deductible.
7.5 Disallow interest claimed in excess of interest income subject to final tax.
7.7 If the recipient is a non-resident alien or other foreign entity, determine if the proper
amount of tax has been withheld (Follow procedures in 6.4 to 6.4.3. hereof).
7.8 Ascertain if the loans acquired were not utilized but were loaned out to affiliates. If so,
disallow interest expense claimed.
8. Taxes
8.1 Verify whether only the taxes properly paid or accrued during the year have been
claimed.
8.2 Determine that no protested taxes or reserves for deficiency taxes upon audit are claimed.
8.3 Determine existence of claims for taxes not allowable as deduction such as:
b. Income, war profits and excess profits taxes imposed by authority of any foreign country;
d. Taxes assessed against local benefits of a kind tending to increase the value of the
property assessed.
8.4 Determine if the taxpayer has title to the real and personal property being taxed.
8.5 Determine if there are any taxes on the purchase of capital assets that were already
capitalized but also charged to expense account.
9. Repairs
9.1 Determine depreciation policy of the taxpayer. A conservative depreciation policy often
contemplates a high degree of current repair expenditures.
9.2 Verify nature of expenditures. If the expenditure prolongs the life or enhances the value
of the existing assets, then it is not deductible but should be capitalized and depreciated over the
years of their estimated usefulness.
9.3 Check repair accounts for the possibility that personal expenses of owners or other
company officers and employees are included.
10.2 Determine with a reasonable degree of certainty the uncollectibility of the debt.
10.3 Determine if the charge-off is based on worthlessness of the debt within the year.
10.4 Determine if there are repossessed merchandise. If so, verify if the value of repossessed
merchandise has been correctly assigned and deducted from the claimed amount of bad debts.
10.5 Verify losses on installment receivable if consideration on any repossessed merchandise
had been taken into account and if portion of the losses had been charged to the unrealized gross
profit account.
10.6 Determine if the method of deducting bad debts is acceptable and consistent with the
method applied in the preceding year.
10.7 Verify bad debts expense in relation to the examination of the allowance for doubtful
accounts.
11. Losses
11.1.1 Verify if the amount of the abandonment loss is the adjusted basis of the abandoned asset.
11.1.2 Determine if the loss of missing assets really occurred within the taxable year.
11.1.3 Determine if the retirement or abandonment loss is specifically allowable under the
taxpayer's method of accounting for depreciable property.
11.1.4 Determine the reason for the demolition of a building. If it was the taxpayer's intention to
demolish the building when the property was first acquired, abandonment loss is not allowable. It
should form part of the cost of the building.
Casualty loss refers to loss of property connected with trade or business. In the verification of
casualty or theft losses, the following pointers should be observed:
11.2.1 Ascertain that a loss has actually been incurred by examining supporting documents such
as police report or report of the fire department.
11.2.2 Ascertain that the loss is claimed in the proper year. Generally casualty loss, is claimed in
the year incurred while losses from theft or embezzlement is claimed in the year discovered.
11.2.3 Ascertain that insurance proceeds or claims, salvage proceeds, or salvage value have been
properly taken into account.
11.2.4 Ascertain that the adjusted basis of lost property has been properly computed. Consider
reasonableness of values used in the computation and ascertain that the loss claimed does not
exceed the adjusted basis.
11.2.5 Ascertain that the rule as to the manner of deductibility have been complied with (type of
asset, whether insured or not, time or period held, and other relevant factors).
11.2.6 In cases involving loss of cash, be alert on the possibility that the cash stolen may not
have been included as income.
112.7 Trace handling of losses involving inventory or stock in trade to preclude double claim of
deduction.
11.2.8 Analyze any loss claimed for assets located in a foreign country.
11.2.9 Verify police blotters, fire department records and other independent documents in
support of the claim.
Pursuant to Section 34 (D) (3) of the Tax Code, "net operating loss" means the excess of
allowable deduction over the gross income of the business in a taxable year.
The validity of the claim for net operating loss carry-over may be determined through the
following procedures:
11.3.1 Secure copies of income tax returns and the applicable audited financial statements for
the three (3) consecutive taxable years immediately preceding the year of claim.
11.3.2 Verify audit reports, if any, covering the taxable years with net operating loss to ascertain
correctness of amount claimed after audit. If the results of audit for prior years show a net
income instead of loss, disallow claim for net operating loss carry-over.
11.3.3 Determine if the net loss was incurred during the taxable year in which the taxpayer was
exempt from income tax. If so, the net operating loss carry-over should not be allowed as a
deduction for the succeeding period.
11.3.4 Examine the taxpayer's stock and transfer book and report submitted to the Securities and
Exchange Commission to ascertain that there is no substantial change in the ownership of the
business or enterprise in that:
a. Not less than seventy five percent (75%) in nominal value of outstanding issued shares, if
the business is in the name of a corporation, is held by or on behalf of the same persons; or
b. Not less than seventy five percent (75%) of the paid up capital of the corporation, if the
business is in the name of a corporation, is held by or on behalf of the same persons.
11.3.5 For operators of mines, other than oil and gas wells, which did not avail of the incentives
under E.O. 226, otherwise known as the Omnibus Incentives Code of 1987, verify correctness of
claim for net operating loss:
a. Refer to audited financial statements and audit reports to check if the net loss was
incurred during the first ten (10) years of operation;
b. Check if the period/taxable year when loss is claimed is within five (5) taxable years
following the loss; and
c. Ensure that there is no substantial change in the ownership of the business or enterprise
as stated in Section 4 hereof.
12. Depreciation
12.1 Compare total depreciation as shown by the depreciation schedule with the deduction
claimed on the return. Reconcile any differences. Be alert for duplication of claimed deductions.
12.2 Review the rates of depreciation used to determine if they are reasonable.
12.3 Test check a representative number of items listed on the depreciation schedule to
determine if the accumulated depreciation at the end of the accounting period exceeds the
depreciable basis of the asset.
12.4 Test check extensions and prove footings to determine if current depreciation has been
correctly computed.
12.5 Determine if there is any personal use of cars and other depreciable assets.
12.6 Ascertain if proper cost allocation has been made on bulk purchases of depreciable and
non-depreciable assets.
13. Depletion
13.2 Determine if the taxpayer has acquired, at least by investment, any interest in oil, gas or
mineral in a place, and secures, by any form of legal relationship, any income derived from the
extraction of oil, gas or mineral.
13.3 The following additional guidelines should be followed in the verification of the
deduction for depletion:
13.3.1 Ascertain that the sales reported in relation to a property do not include sales applicable
to another property, sales of purchased minerals, non-minerals sales or other income items.
13.3.2 Ascertain, where applicable, if mineral sales have been adjusted to "gross income from
the property" by reduction of such factors as unallowable treatment cost, unallowable
transportation costs, rents and royalties, including a proportionate part of lease bonuses, amounts
paid to others in contract mining or similar operations where the other party has acquired an
economic interest and is entitled to depletion, certain excise taxes, trade discounts allowed and
other deductions.
13.3.3 In situations where the basis for percentage of depletion is not the actual sales price of a
finished product but a value of the mineral at the point at which it has passed through the last
allowable treatment process applicable thereto, determine if the value used is the correct
representative market or field price.
13.3.4 Ascertain that mineral sales made to a business controlled by the taxpayer are not inflated
to gain a tax advantage through depletion.
13.3.5 Ascertain that all expenses applicable to a property have been charged to that property
including a proper allocation of general, administrative and overhead expenses.
13.3.6 Be alert on possible reduction of expenses by improper offsets such as income from scrap
sales, cash discounts earned, sales of assets, and other income.
14. Contributions
14.1 Determine if the donee or recipient is the government or an accredited relief organization.
14.2 Determine if the contribution is to be utilized for the rehabilitation of calamity stricken
areas declared by the President.
14.3 Verify if the claim is actually paid within the taxable year.
15.1 Determine if the expenditures have been incurred in relation to the business or practice of
profession, not for personal use.
15.2 For transportation and travel expenses, the following information are necessary to
properly determine deductibility:
a. Date of travel
b. Purpose of the travel and written authority for the travel
c. The person or persons who incurred the expenditure
d. Place or places travelled
e. Amount of expenditure
f. Means of transportation or travel
15.3 Determine if taxpayer's travel and transportation and representation and entertainment
expenses are recorded in a daily diary. If such expenses appear to be disproportionate to the
taxpayer's income and business activities, the taxpayer should be required to corroborate the
book entries by furnishing documentary proofs.
15.4 Determine the policy with respect to reimbursement or giving grants of allowances to
employees.
15.5 Ascertain the specific amounts recorded for these items.
15.6 Prepare a summary of the total expenses posted to the accounts and compare the same
with the deductions claimed per tax return.
15.7 Select a representative test period or periods and test check entries in the ledger against
supporting receipts and documents.
15.8 Determine from the analysis and verification of supporting documents the reliability of
the records.
15.9 Determine company-owned vehicles and the expenses incurred in connection with these
vehicles.
16.1 Determine if the expenses claimed are not capitalizable office furniture and equipment.
16.2 Verify if personal purchases by the taxpayer/owner are included in the account.
16.4 Compare receipts with the amounts claimed and investigate significant discrepancies.
17.1 Determine if the charges include amounts incurred for legal, accounting, engineering,
appraisal, surveying and other similar services.
17.2 Verify if the amounts are material and examine contracts to check the detailed description
of the exact professional services rendered.
17.4 Determine charges for research and experimental expenses. These items should form part
of the cost of patents, trade-marks and copyrights and other intangible assets subject to
amortization.
18.1 Verify insurance policies. Premiums paid by employers on individual life insurance
policies of their employees are not deductible if the employer is a direct or indirect beneficiary of
such proceeds.
18.2 For individuals, ascertain if his claim for insurance premiums on health and/or
hospitalization insurance, including for his family, does not exceed two thousand four hundred
pesos (P2,400) during the taxable year, provided that:
a. In case of married individuals, the combined income of the taxpayer and his spouse does
not exceed two hundred fifty thousand pesos (P250,000) during the same taxable year; and
b. Only the spouse claiming the additional exemption for dependents shall be entitled to this
deduction.
18.3 Determine if the employee is the beneficiary of the insurance. Otherwise, the premiums
paid shall be treated as an additional salary provided that it is reasonable.
18.4 Check the account if it includes fire insurance, burglary insurance and other policies on
officer's/stockholder's personal and real properties.
19.1 Determine material amounts claimed as it may include capitalizable electrical equipment
or purchases of capital items from utility companies.
19.2 Examine the receipts issued by the utility companies. Compare the same with the
amounts claimed per return. Investigate material discrepancies.
19.3 Determine if there are personal expenses included in the expense account.
19.4 Relate the expense consumption against sales and production to determine any possible
underdeclaration of sales.
20.3 Ascertain if the miscellaneous expenses claimed do not contain any personal items.
XI. Audit of Minimum Corporate Income Tax and Improperly Accumulated Earnings Tax
Pursuant to Section 27 (E)(1) of the Tax Code, a minimum corporate income tax (MCIT) of two
percent (2%) of the gross income as of the end of the taxable year is imposed on a corporation
taxable under Title II of the Tax Code, beginning on the fourth taxable year immediately
following the year in which such corporation commenced its business operations, when the
minimum income tax is greater than the tax computed under Section 27 (A) of the Tax Code.
Any excess of the minimum corporate income over the normal income tax shall be carried
forward and credited against the normal income tax for the three (3) immediately succeeding
taxable years.
The verification of the minimum corporate income tax may be conducted as follows:
1. Determine the taxability of the taxpayer to the MCIT. The MCIT shall apply to domestic
and resident foreign corporations subject to the normal corporate income tax and shall not be
imposed upon any of the following:
1.2 Domestic corporations engaged in non-profit hospital operations subject to ten percent
(10%) income tax rate;
1.3 Domestic corporations engaged in business as depository banks under the expanded
foreign currency deposit system, otherwise known a Foreign Currency Deposit Units (FCDUs),
on their income from foreign currency transactions with local commercial banks, including
branches of foreign banks, authorized by the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP) to transact
business with foreign currency deposit system units and other depository banks under the foreign
currency deposit system, including their interest income from foreign currency loans granted to
residents of the Philippines under the expanded foreign currency deposit system, subject to final
income tax at ten percent (10%) of such income;
1.5 Resident foreign corporations engaged in business as Offshore Banking Units (OBUs) on
their income from foreign currency transactions with local commercial banks, including branches
of foreign banks, authorized by the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP) to transact business with
Offshore Banking Units (OBUs), including interest income from foreign currency loans granted
to residents of the Philippines, subject to a final income tax at ten percent (10%) of such income;
1.7 Firms that are taxed under a special income tax regime such as those in accordance with
RA Nos. 7916 and 7227.
2.1 Check the accuracy of the declaration of gross sales/receipts contributing to income
taxable under Section 27 (A) of the Code.
2.1.1 Ascertain the accounting method employed by the taxpayer and verify consistency in its
application. In case of sales of services by taxpayers employing the accrual basis of accounting,
the term "gross receipts" shall mean amounts earned as gross income and these shall include
amounts actually or constructively received during the taxable year.
2.1.2 Exclude items of sale specifically exempt from income tax, and those passive income
subject to special tax rates.
2.1.3 Ascertain legitimacy of deductions from gross sales such as sales returns, discounts and
allowances.
2.2 Verify correctness of the claim for cost of goods sold. Ensure that only business expenses
directly incurred to produce the merchandise to bring them to their present location and use or to
provide the contracted services are included in this account.
a. For trading or merchandising concern, "cost of goods sold" means the invoice cost of the
goods sold, plus import duties, freight in transporting the goods to the place where the goods are
actually sold, including insurance while the goods are in transit.
b. For manufacturing concern, "cost of goods manufactured and sold" means all costs of
production of finished goods, such as raw materials used, direct labor and manufacturing
overhead, freight cost, insurance premiums and other costs incurred to bring the raw materials to
the factory or warehouse.
c. For sales of services, "cost of services" means all direct costs and expenses necessarily
incurred to provide the services required by the customers and client including (1) salaries and
employee benefits of personnel, consultants and specialists directly rendering the service; and (2)
cost of facilities directly utilized in providing the service such as depreciation or rental of
equipment used and cost of supplies.
Except for banks and other financial institutions, cost of sales/services shall not include interest
expense.
3. Determine the period when the taxpayer becomes subject to the minimum corporate
income tax.
3.2 Verify the year of taxpayer's registration with the BIR to ascertain whether or not it is
subject to MCIT:
a. Firms registered with BIR in 1994 and earlier years are covered by the MCIT beginning
January 1, 1998.
b. Firms registered with BIR in any month in 1998 are covered three calendar years
thereafter.
For fiscal period taxpayer, taxable year 1998 shall mean any fiscal period ending any day from
July 1, 1997 up to June 30, 1998.
3.3 Ascertain whether the first taxable period under the MCIT of the taxpayer using fiscal-
year accounting covers month/months in 1997 prior to the imposition of MCIT. Be sure that the
computed MCIT due for 1998 using the apportionment formula is correct.
4. Verify if the taxpayer is entitled to the relief from the imposition of the MCIT and secure
documentary proof for the suspension of its imposition as approved by the Secretary of Finance.
5. Check accuracy of the amount of excess MCIT carried over and credited against the
normal tax within the three (3) immediately succeeding years from payment thereof, if any. See
to it that any excess MCIT are not claimed against MCIT itself or against any other losses.
In accordance with Section 29 (A) of the Tax Code, an improperly accumulated earnings tax
equal to ten percent (10%) of the improperly accumulated taxable income is imposed for each
taxable year on the improperly accumulated taxable income of each corporation identified under
Section 27 (B) of the Tax Code.
2. Determine the reasonableness of the accumulation of profits or earnings and if the same
is required for the purposes of the business, considering all the circumstances of the case.
2.1 Look into the following factors to ascertain if the accumulated profits are reasonably
needed in the business:
2.2 Secure copies of the board resolutions and verify therefrom any existence of undue
accumulation of profits, correlating the findings with the plans per resolution as against the
business activities and dealings made by the corporation.
2.3 Require the taxpayer to submit documentary proof negating the clear preponderance of
evidence that the profits were permitted to accumulate beyond the reasonable needs of the
company's business. The accumulation of surplus for the reasonable needs of the business is not
prevented if the purpose is not to prevent the imposition of the tax upon the shareholders.
Undistributed income may be considered as properly accumulated in the following cases:
b. The profit is invested in additions to plants, facilities and activities reasonably required
by the business provided that the plans for expansion or improvement must be definite, concrete
and capable of fulfillment and not what may be characterized as nebulous plans for future action.
d. The profit is intended as reserves to meet competition, for anticipated losses or reverses
in business, and to meet business hazards and emergencies.
2.4 Verify whether the company's increase in capitalization, if any, is necessary in the light
of the existing circumstances surrounding the business. Ascertain whether declaration of stock
dividends from increased corporate capital was made to go around the surtax since stock
dividends are not taxable unless there is a change of interest, or unless they are disposed of by
the holders or redeemed by the additional tax if the aforementioned scheme was clearly
established.
3. Determine the amount of improperly accumulated taxable income subject to the surtax.
3.1 Account for all the company's income during the year.
3.2. Determine all the appropriate adjustments to the improperly accumulated taxable income.
For purposes of imposing the tax, the taxable income shall be adjusted by the following items:
3.3 Deduct dividends actually or constructively paid and income tax paid for the taxable year
from the adjusted taxable income.
3.4 Exclude the improperly accumulated income as of December 31, 1997 in the computation
of accumulated taxable income subject to tax. The surtax shall likewise not apply to fiscal-period
taxpayers where the twelve (12) month period ended any day from January up to November
1998.
Compute the 10% surtax based on the adjusted improperly accumulated taxable income. The
computation of the surtax shall be made on a year-to-year basis depending on the thorough
evaluation of the circumstances proving that the company has indeed permitted itself to
accumulate earnings or profits beyond the reasonable needs of the business.
The use of computers to process accounting data has a significant effect on the audit skills of the
Revenue Officer. The ability to understand and evaluate the taxpayer's information technology
(IT) is important. The Revenue Officer must understand the flow of accounting data or audit
trails on a computerized system to conduct a quality audit.
Auditing computer records require basic techniques used in auditing manual books and records.
There is still a need to:
As part of the initial interview, the Revenue Officer should ask questions to achieve a clear
understanding of the taxpayer's books and records, such as:
In addition to asking the taxpayer about the particular information system, the Revenue Officer
must study the software manual. The manual will tell how the system works and the types of
reports available. The Revenue Officer shall determine the reasonable time to be spent in
reviewing the software capabilities.
The traditional audit approach to audit double-entry books and records is to scan through the
general ledger and note any unusual entries. The purpose of this scanning is to identify entries in
the computerized general ledger which are unusual due to the amount, source or nature.
1. Unusual in Amount
The basic technique for identifying large charges or variations to accounts in a computerized
system consists of securing the monthly statements. Usually, these will be retained by the
taxpayer. The monthly balances are reviewed for changes. Changes in the monthly account
balances are then explored by reviewing the monthly detail and scanning the check register. The
Revenue Officer must consider if the charge or variation could be expected, is reasonable and in
the expected direction, and is material enough to warrant investigation. For example, if monthly
trial balances showed rent expense of P500 and one month showed P1,500, you would ask the
taxpayer about the P1,500 rent expense.
2. Unusual by Source
The basic technique for detecting entries to accounts from unusual sources consists of comparing
monthly posting summaries from each source with the chart of accounts. A computerized system
will utilize monthly posting summaries. These summaries will show monthly changes to an
account, most often by account number and originating journal. By comparing the accounts
which show monthly changes with the chart of accounts, posting to unusual accounts can be
detected. Scan the accounts payable listings for vendors that appear personal in nature.
3. Unusual by Nature
The basic technique for detecting entries to accounts, which are unusual by nature, involves the
same process as shown for detecting entries from unusual sources. You are looking for debit
posting to accounts which normally contain only credit posting and vice versa. An example
would be a debit to a sales account, which could be a bad debt written-off. Accounts which exist
at the beginning of the year and not at the end might indicate unauthorized accounting changes.
Over the years, the Bureau of Internal Revenue has developed the following general methods for
reconstructing a taxpayer's income.
A. Percentage method
B. Net worth method
C. Bank deposits method
D. Cash expenditure method
E. Unit and value method
F. Third party information or access to records method
G. Surveillance and assessment method
A. Percentage Method
This method is the equivalent of a ratio analysis of percentages considered typical of the business
under investigation to indicate potential areas of revenue adjustment in examination where
revenue records do not exist. The computed amount of revenues based on the percentage
computation is compared to the amount of revenues reflected on the return. The percentages used
may be obtained from the taxpayer, industry publication, prior year's audit results, or third
parties. The comparison will provide an indication on the possibility of revenue being
understated. The extent of investigation required should be based on the degree of variance.
1. Percentage Mark-up
This is effective on businesses whose purchases can be readily broken down in groups with
approximately the same percentage of mark-up.
The purchases should be grouped in items with the same percentage of mark-up. The appropriate
percentage of mark-up would then be applied to each group of items to arrive at the gross
receipts.
The percentage of mark-up can be determined from selling prices obtained from the taxpayer.
However, if cooperation from the taxpayer is lacking, the information should be obtained from
competitive business establishments in the same industry.
Once the gross receipts are determined, the taxpayer should be given the opportunity to explain
the discrepancy noted between the reconstructed gross receipts and the amounts reflected in the
books and in the tax returns. The taxpayer may argue that the percentage mark-up should not be
applied to purchases which were stolen, broken or spoiled.
When reconstructing income using the mark-up method, possible unrecorded purchases should
be considered.
Comparison should be made with prior period ratios to evaluate the taxpayer's own performance
in previous years or with other firms in the same industry.
3. Profit Margin
Net Income
----- = Profit Margin
Net Sales
If the profit margin is low, this will indicate that the firm's sales prices are relatively low or that
its costs are relatively high or both.
4. Total Assets Turnover
Sales
-----
Total Assets
A high rate compared to the industry would signify sufficient volume of business and if a net
loss is declared, questions must be raised or further investigation and analysis should be
performed.
e. Inventory Turnover
Inventory turnover=
Sales
-----
Total Assets
or
Cost of Sales
---------
Beg. Invty. + End Invty./2
If the turnover is low, the company could be holding damaged or obsolete materials not actually
worth their stated volume.
Average inventory at a given point X turnover rate = total purchases during the year.
The fact that the taxpayer's books and records accurately reflect the figures on the income and
business tax returns does not prevent the use of the net worth method of proof. The Revenue
Officer can still look beyond the "self-serving declaration" in the taxpayer's books and records
and use any evidences available to contravene their accuracy. However, this net worth method is
most often used when one or more of the following conditions prevail:
In applying this method, it is important to establish the net worth on a fixed starting date. This is
to erase doubts that the increase in net worth or the excess of expenditures over reported income
did not originate from prior accumulated funds (i.e. hoarded cash or undisclosed assets which do
not represent income during the tax year).
Assets xxx
Less: Liabilities xxx
--
Net Worth xxx
The "Net Worth" method to be acceptable must establish with reasonable certainty an opening
net worth, to serve as a starting point from which to compute future increases in the taxpayer's
assets. It must also introduce evidence to support the inference that the taxpayer's net increases
are attributable to currently taxable income.
In computing the increase, the taxpayer's assets are totalled and net worth as determined at the
close of the previous taxable year is subtracted from the total at the close of the taxable year in
question. The remainder, if .any, is the increase for the taxable year, and constitutes taxable
income if no adjustments are required.
However, where net worth increase is the income determinant the Revenue Officer may, in
making the final computation upon which to base the tax, add to the increase estimated living
expenses incurred by the taxpayer since such expenditures are presumed to have come from
income. The taxpayer, on the other hand, is entitled to reduce the reconstructed income by the
amount of depreciation allowable on assets which are not considered in determining net worth.
The factors to be considered in reconstructing net worth are variable, like availability of
evidence. Generally, net worth has been computed on the basis of some, all or a combination of
the following:
a. bank records
b. securities
c. financial statements
d. fixed assets
e. inventory
f. all available records
The difficulty of establishing the opening net worth of a taxpayer has led to the use of the Cohan
rule to estimate or approximate the amount of cash at that time. The Cohan rule (established by
the US Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals in Cohan vs. Commissioner) allows the use of
estimates where the taxpayer lacks adequate records.
When the taxpayer's records are apparently inaccurate or manifestly incomplete, the Revenue
Officer may look at the bank deposits of the taxpayer as evidence income. Under the bank
deposit method, the bank records of the taxpayer are analyzed and the Revenue Officer estimates
income on the basis of the total bank deposits after eliminating non-income items. This method
stands on the premise that deposits represent taxable income unless otherwise explained as
being-non-taxable items. This method can be used if the Revenue Officer has been allowed
access to the taxpayer's bank records or if the Revenue Officer has obtained documented
evidence from reliable sources as to the taxpayer's bank accounts.
While the mere deposit of money does not prove the receipt of taxable income as alleged by the
Revenue Officer, the burden is on the taxpayer to prove that various deposits did not stem from
the receipt of taxable income. The passage of time makes it difficult for the taxpayer to meet this
burden but this does not relieve him from showing the non-taxable source to contradict the
Revenue Officer's determination. If the bank deposit method is used in support of findings of
fraud, however, the burden of proof is on the Revenue Officer.
When computing taxable income under this method, it is appropriate to add to the amount of the
bank deposit the amount of cash expenditures from undeposited funds for personal expenses
which is non-deductible for tax purposes.
Withdrawals which can be identified as deductible are allowed against the taxable income
determined.
In using this method, it is proper to prove the existence of a business and the practice of making
deposit of business income into one or more bank accounts and then to adjust the total deposits
for transfers, redeposits, deposits otherwise explained and finally to allow for ascertainable
expenses, deductions and exemptions.
The Revenue Officer's careful analysis of the taxpayer's bank deposits constitutes the most
important phase of his investigation. A review of the taxpayer's personal and business bank
records for several months should be made. The following questions should be answered in
analyzing the taxpayer's deposits:
1.1 Are deposits made on a basis consistent with the information secured during the initial
interview?
1.3 Are there any deposits from sources not reflected on the tax return?
1.4 Did the examination of the taxpayer's cancelled checks reveal additional bank accounts
not previously disclosed by the taxpayer?
1.5 Are there checks endorsed by the taxpayer and deposited into an account not previously
disclosed?
1.6 Are there checks for assets or personal expenses that affect the taxpayer's standard of
living?
c. Personal expenses
paid in cash (sch. 3) xxx
d. Cash accumulated
during the year from
receipts xxx
e. Increase in
Accounts Receivable xxx
f. Decrease in accounts
payable xxx xxx
-- --
Total xxx
Deposits may represent redeposited items and loans, in which case, taxable income as
determined by the Revenue Officer should be reduced by such amounts. When there is evidence
that some of the deposits were for non-taxable items and as such, there is no proof of the precise
amount of taxable income, the Cohan principle may be resorted to. Deposits may also be shown
to represent amounts on hand at the start of the year in which they are deposited rather than
income in that year.
The bank deposit method, like the net worth method, encompasses an area of uncertainty.
Though the taxpayer's records are inadequate for precise and complete verification of its return, a
determination of income by the bank deposit method will be rejected if it is inconsistent with
surrounding circumstances and gives an absurd result.
D. Cash Expenditure Method
An outgrowth of the net worth method of determining income is the "excess cash expenditure
method. This method assumes that the excess of a taxpayer's expenditures during a tax period
over his reported income for that period is taxable to the extent not approved otherwise. The
taxpayer may show that this excess resulted from non-taxable items such as loans, gifts,
inheritance or assets on hand at the beginning of the period.
While it has been said that no opening net worth is needed when the cash expenditure method is
used, the more impressive authority is to the contrary. The two steps involved in the cash
expenditure method are: a) valuation of the taxpayer's assets at the beginning of the taxable
period in order to determine the taxpayer's funds available for expenditure during the ensuing
taxable periods and b) determination of the amount by which expenditures exceed reported
income for the taxable period. To show a failure to report the full amount of income by the use of
this method, it must be demonstrated that the expenditures made during the taxable year were in
excess of the available funds during the year which were reported on the tax return.
Total expenditures may not include checks drawn to cash and items for which the taxpayer has
paid in cash, unless the cash bank withdrawals were not used to pay for the cash expenditure.
The burden is on the taxpayer to establish the relationship between the cash withdrawal and
individual items. Expenditures may not necessarily come from income, but very large
expenditures for personal purposes each year may be interpreted as an indication that the income
being reported was too small.
Consideration must be given to non-taxable sources of cash. Here, too, the difficulty of
establishing the amount of cash at the starting point has led to the use of Cohan rule to estimate
the cash available at the opening of the taxable period. The method has to be rejected when it
gives an unrealistic result.
Proof in cash expenditure case may be difficult, for it is highly unusual for anyone to keep
accurate records of personal living expenses. However, once the Revenue Officer has made a
determination as to the amount of cash expenditures, the burden of proof to establish a different
amount is on the taxpayer.
This is not considered as a primary method proof. The determination or verification of gross
receipts may be computed by applying price and profit figures to the known ascertainable quality
of business of the taxpayer. In addition, there are existing regulatory bodies to which the
taxpayer reports units of production or service, some of which are:
Third party contacts are a source of information that should not be forgotten. The Revenue
Officer should determine when to make third party inquiries. The decision to make a third party
inquiry is shaped by the size of the peso amount involved and the volume of the transaction.
Third party inquiry through access to records can be time consuming. The Revenue Officer must
weigh the benefits to be realized from work against the time required to make an access to
records and the availability of the needed information through other methods. The need for the
Revenue Officer to obtain third party information is most often involved in our attempts to verify
gross receipts.
A. Withholding Taxes
The following audit procedures outline the steps to be performed by a Revenue Officer in the
determination of the correct amount of withholding taxes due from withholding agents to
ascertain if:
The audit procedures are classified according to the classification of withholding taxes, to wit:
1.1 Verify the number and list of employees per payroll records and the list of employees
submitted to the Social Security System and the Department of Labor and Employment as
against the alphalist of employees from whom taxes have been withheld which is attached to the
annual information return (BIR Form 1604CF).
1.2 Examine payroll records. including confidential payroll, if any, employment contracts,
supporting vouchers, receipts for advances/reimbursements of transportation and representation
expenses, receipts for payment of compensation and reconcile amount of supported expenses
with the figures per financial statements and withholding tax remittance returns.
1.3 Determine the correctness of the amount of personal and additional exemptions claimed
in the Certificate of Exemption (BIR Form 2305) as accomplished and filed by the employee.
Check the computation of the correct withholding tax per payroll period.
1.4 Examine monthly withholding tax remittance returns (BIR Form 1601C) and compare
amounts remitted against the computed withholding tax on compensation per audit.
1.5 Reconcile the aggregate gross compensation income stated in the withholding certificate
(BIR Form 2316) with the total amount indicated in the gross compensation income column of
the alphalist.
2.1 Check amount payable or paid per income statement and income tax returns (BIR Forms
1701 and 1701Q) against those declared in the monthly and annual returns (BIR Forms 1601E
and 1604E).
2.3 Determine the correctness of the amounts subject to withholding tax by comparing the
total payments per supporting documents against the amount per withholding tax returns.
2.3 Verify the correctness of the payee classification and withholding tax rate applied.
2.5 Determine the dates of payment or the period when the obligation to pay the amount
subject to withholding tax is due. The time to withhold is fixed at the time the obligation is due
irrespective of the actual payment.
3.1 Review the contracts for payment of certain items of income to resident and non-resident
payees of interest and rent, Central Bank approval papers, commercial papers, employment
contracts, contract for payment of royalties, records of prizes or winnings and financial
statements.
3.2 Ascertain if the income payment was subjected to withholding tax in the year it was
accrued, irrespective of whether the taxes withheld were remitted within ten (10) days following
the month in which the payment was accrued. In the case of withholding tax on interest on bank
deposits, the remittance shall be made quarterly within twenty five (25) days after the end of
each quarter.
3.3 Check the correctness of the basis and rate of withholding tax applied.
3.3.1 If a preferential tax rate is being availed of, verify the correctness of the rate used from
the ruling issued either by the International Tax Affairs Division (ITAD) or Law Division. Also
verify the authenticity of said ruling from the issuing office.
3.4 Ascertain the date of accrual of the income payment, to fix the time to withhold,
irrespective of the actual remittance or non-remittance of the tax withheld by reason of official
restriction.
3.5 Verify correctness of remittance against monthly remittance returns (BIR Form 1601F)
and annual information return (BIR Form 1604CF).
4.1 Examine government contracts with suppliers, purchase records, payment orders, billing
records, receipts, vouchers, cash book and reports of COA auditors.
4.2 Check money payments from vouchers, billing records, records of purchases, COA audit
reports, etc. against monthly remittance returns (BIR Form 1600), books of accounts and other
accounting records maintained.
4.4 Check whether the correct amount of tax has been withheld and remitted within the
prescribed period. Otherwise, impose appropriate penalties for non-withholding or non-
remittance of the tax, as the case may be.
This Section equips the Revenue Officer with minimum audit steps prescribed by existing
revenue issuances in the proper determination of the correct capital gains tax due on sale, transfer
or exchange of real properties. Additional audit techniques must be employed by the Revenue
Officer depending on the complexity and materiality of the transactions involved.
2. If the object of the sale or disposition is the principal residence of natural persons, verify
the following:
2.1. Whether the proceeds of the sale or disposition was fully utilized in acquiring or
constructing a new principal residence of the seller; and
2.2 Whether such construction or acquisition of such new principal residence is within
eighteen (18) months from date of sale or disposition.
If both are in the affirmative, the sale or disposition shall be exempt from capital gains tax,
subject to the following conditions:
2.2.1 The historical cost or adjusted basis of the real property sold or disposed shall be carried
over to the new principal residence built;
2.2.2 The Commissioner shall have been duly notified by the - taxpayer within thirty (30) days
from the date of disposition through a prescribed return of his intention to avail of the exemption;
2.2.3 The exemption from capital gains tax shall be availed of only once in every ten (10)
years; and
2.2.4 In case where the proceeds of the sale or disposition is not fully utilized, the portion for
the unutilized part shall be subjected to tax using the formula:
3. For disposition of real property without any improvement, obtain a certificate from the
City/Provincial/Municipal Assessor on the non-existence of improvement on the real property
being sold, transferred or exchanged.
4. Ascertain correctness of the value of the property sold by conducting an ocular inspection
of the property.
5. If the seller is a non-resident alien claiming exemption from paying the capital gains tax,
check the existence of a ruling issued to that effect pursuant to RMO 1-2000. Also verify the
authenticity of said ruling from the issuing office.
6. Review computation of the tax base for land and improvement in accordance with the
following:
6.1.1 Determine the value of improvements by using the formulas shown below:
b. Improvements introduced
from 1991 to present:
Construction cost per
building permit and/or
occupancy permit xxx
Improvements introduced
in 1986 to 1990:
Construction cost per
building permit and/or
occupancy permit xxx
Add 10% thereof per
year after year of
Construction xxx
--
Value of Improvements xxx
===
c. Improvements introduced in 1985 and prior years, and in cases of improvements in places
other than the National Capital Region and chartered cities where there is no building permit
and/or occupancy permit, use the following formula:
6.2 When the zonal value of land has not been established
6.2.1 Determine the total selling price/consideration per deed of sale of land and improvement
6.2.2 Determine value of land and improvements by using the following formula:
7. In case of installment sales, determine whether the taxpayer is qualified to report his gain
under the installment basis. An individual is qualified to account for his gain on installment basis
if the initial payment does not exceed 25% of the selling price. The term "initial payment" means
the payment or payments which the seller receives before or upon execution of the instrument of
sale and payments which he expects or is scheduled to receive in cash or property (other than
evidence of indebtedness of the purchaser) during the taxable year of sale or disposition.
Example: Assume that on October 15, 1998, an individual sold for P100,000 a real property with
an adjusted basis of P60,000 under the following terms: P10,000 upon execution of sale; the
balance of P90,000 in 18 equal monthly installments of P5,000 each beginning November 15,
1998. The taxpayer qualifies to pay the capital gains tax on installment because the initial
payment consisting of the amount of P10,000 he received upon sale and the amount he expects
or is scheduled to receive - P5,000 on November 15, 1998 and P5,000 on December 15, 1998, or
a total of P20,000 during the year of sale do not exceed 25 % of the selling price.
If the taxpayer qualifies and elects to pay the capital gains tax in installments, the tax may be
paid in installments, the amount of each installment of which shall be the proportion of the tax so
determined which are:
7.1.1 On the date of sale or disposition, first payment (amount received, including the excess of
the mortgage, if any, assumed by the purchaser) over the basis of the property sold; and
7.1.2 In succeeding payments, the installment payment received by the seller in relation to the
total contract price.
Illustrations:
Example 1. Assume that on January 2, 1998, an individual sold a piece of property with adjusted
basis of P60,000 for P100,000 under the following terms: P20,000 downpayment; balance in five
annual installments beginning 1999. Taxpayer elects and is qualified to pay the tax in
installment. The periodic payment of the tax is computed as follows:
Portion of the tax payable upon sale or upon receipt of first payment is determined as follows:
Portion of the tax payable annually for five years beginning 1999 is computed as follows:
Example 2. Assume that in 1969, an individual acquired a property for P60,000. In 1999, he sold
the property for P100,000. Terms of sale: Downpayment, January 2, 1998, P10,000; mortgage
assumed, P40,000; balance payable in four annual installments beginning January 2, 1998. The
taxpayer elects to pay the tax on the gain in installments.
Example 3. Assume that in 1998, an individual sold for P100,000 a piece of real property which
he bought in 1980 for P40,000. Prior to sale, the property was mortgaged for P60,000. The terms
of sale are as follows: Downpayment, P10,000; assumption of unpaid mortgage, P50,000;
balance of P40,000 payable in four semi-annual payments beginning January 15, 1999. The
taxpayer elects to pay the tax in installments. Amount of tax payable in installments is computed
as follows:
First payment:
Cash P10,000
Excess of mortgage
assumed by buyer
over the
acquisition cost
(P50,000-P40,000) 10,000
---------
Total first payment 20,000
=======
Total Contract Price:
Selling Price P100,000
Less: Mortgage
Assumed 50,000
---------
P50,000
Add: Excess of
mortgage
assumed
over basis of
property sold 10,000
----------
Total contract price P60,000
=======
8. Confirm payment of Capital Gains Tax by cross-checking the payment thereof with the
Batch Control Sheet prepared by the bank or the Collection Officer, as the case may be.
9. When there is delay in the presentation of sales, documents, require the taxpayer to
submit documents such as cancelled checks, official receipts or certification of the archive
official to show that there is no ante-dating of public instrument. The rules and regulations
applicable at the date of execution of the contract shall be applied and the increments for late
filing and payment of tax shall be imposed.
If the taxpayer cannot show proofs that the same is not ante-dated, the rules applicable at the
time of presentation of the document shall apply.
C. Estate Tax
The following audit procedures were culled from existing revenue issuances. They enumerate the
steps to be taken by a Revenue Officer in the processing, verification and investigation of estate
tax returns of resident and non-resident decedents subject to estate tax. However, these do not
preclude the application of other audit procedures as warranted by the circumstances surrounding
each case.
1. The estate tax return of a decedent and all his unverified income tax returns for the last
three years prior to his death shall be simultaneously investigated by a Revenue Officer or a
group of Revenue Officers, if so provided in the annual Audit Program.
The Revenue Officer should see to it that an income tax return covering the income and
deductions of the decedent from January 1 to the date of his death has been filed. If the period
covered by the return consists of less than twelve (12) months, such period shall be considered as
a "taxable year".
2. If the settlement of the estate of the decedent is the object of judicial testamentary or
intestate proceedings, ascertain if:
2.1 An income tax return for the estate as a taxable person has been filed by the fiduciary or
administrator; and
2.2 Individual returns for the spouse, heirs or beneficiaries have been filed covering their
respective income from the estate and applicable deductions for the period from the date
immediately following the death of the decedent to the end of the taxable year.
The estate's income tax return shall cover the income and deductions of the estate for the period
from the date immediately following the death of the decedent to the end of the taxable year.
Thereafter, quarterly and annual returns for the estate shall be filed until the estate is divided and
distributed to the rightful heirs and beneficiaries.
3. If the settlement of the estate is not the object of judicial testamentary or intestate
proceedings, verify if the income of the properties left by the decedent is included in the income
tax return of each heir or beneficiary according to his distributive share in the net income of the
estate or co-ownership.
4. Verify if a Notice of Death was filed within two (2) months after the decedent's death
where the gross value of the estate exceeds twenty thousand pesos (P20,000). In case of failure to
file the notice, impose the appropriate penalty even after the lapse of the prescribed period of two
(2) months after the qualification of the executor or administrator. This contemplates the filing of
the estate proceedings in courts and the appointment of the executor or administrator by the
court.
5. Determine if the value of the gross estate exceeds two million pesos (P2,000,000). If so,
check whether the estate tax return is supported by a statement duly certified by a Certified
Public Accountant showing the following information:
5.1 Itemized assets of the decedent with their corresponding gross value at the time of his
death, or in the case of a non-resident alien, of that part of his gross estate situated in the
Philippines;
5.2 Itemized deductions from gross estate allowed under Sec. 86 (A) of the Tax Code; and
5.3 The amount of tax due whether paid or still due and outstanding.
6. Examine the inventory of assets and/or liabilities not reported in the said return. Prepare
an adjusted schedule of
assets and liabilities as basis in computing the yearly increase in the net worth of the taxpayer up
to the time of his death.
7. Inquire on the source of acquisition of the property left by the decedent, whether it was
acquired by purchase, donation or inheritance, for the purpose of ascertaining if such property is
conjugal, exclusive or paraphernal property of the deceased.
8. Scrutinize the provisions of the insurance policies taken out by the deceased upon his
own life as to the designation of the beneficiary. If the designation is revocable, the proceeds of
the life insurance shall be included in the gross estate. If irrevocable, the proceeds thereof shall
be excluded from the gross estate, irrespective of whether or not the insured retained the power
of revocation, if the beneficiary named in the policy is the estate of the decedent.
9. Verify if the land, as part of gross estate specially urban land, include improvements and
buildings. Secure a certification from the Assessor's Officer as to the existence of non-existence
of improvements on the land. Conduct an ocular inspection of the land whenever possible.
10. Conduct third party verification on certain government agencies such as Office of the
Register of Deeds, Securities and Exchange Commission, Land Transportation Office, Office of
the Provincial, City or Municipal Assessor for possible properties listed and registered in the
name of the decedent which may not have been included in the estate tax return.
11. Inquire into the bank deposits or other investments of the decedent. Pursuant to Sec. 6
(F)(1) of the Tax Code, the Commissioner is authorized to look into the bank deposits of a
decedent for estate tax purposes, the provisions of Republic Act No. 1405 and other general or
special laws notwithstanding. Foreign currency deposits, if any, shall be converted using the
foreign exchange rate.
12. Ascertain if the shares of stocks are properly valued. In doing so, observe the following
rules on valuation pursuant to RAMO No. 1-82:
12.1.1 The selling price shall be used where there are sales made on the valuation date. The
mean between the highest and lowest selling prices on valuation dates shall be the fair market
value per share.
12.1.2 If there were no sales on the valuation date but there were sales on dates within a
reasonable period both before and after the valuation date, the fair market value is determined by
taking the weighted average of the mean between the highest and the lowest sales in the nearest
trading date after the valuation date. The weighted average is to be computed inversely by the
respective number of trading days between the selling dates and the valuation date. The
reasonable period of valuation must not exceed six months before or after the valuation date.
Example:
The valuation date is January 15, Friday. Sales of stock occurred on January 13, Wednesday or
two trading days before valuation date at P10.00 and on Wednesday, January 20, three days after
valuation date at P15.00, the fair market value of the shares to be taken is P12.00 computed as
follows:
12.1.3 If actual sales of the shares are not available during a reasonable period beginning before
and ending after the valuation date, the fair market value may be determined by taking the mean
between bona fide bid and asked prices on the valuation date, or if none, by taking the weighted
average of the mean between the bona fide bid and asked prices on the nearest trading date
before and after the valuation date within a reasonable period in accordance with the formula in
the preceding paragraph.
12.1.4 If there are no sales or bonafide bid and asked prices available on a date within a
reasonable period before the valuation date, but such prices are available on a date within a
reasonable period after the valuation date, then the mean between the highest and lowest
available sale prices or bid and asked prices nearest the valuation date may be taken as the value
of shares.
12.1.5 If it is established that the selling or bid and asked prices as provided in the foregoing
paragraphs do not reflect the fair market value thereof, modifications of the basis are to be made
taking into consideration other relevant facts and elements of value. In some exceptional cases,
the size of the block of stocks to be valued in relation to the number of shares transferred in sales
may affect adversely the fair market value of the stocks to be valued.
12.2 For unlisted stocks or stocks not quoted or traded in the stock market:
12.2.1 In general, the unlisted shares shall be valued at their book value nearest the valuation
date. The book value of these unlisted shares of stock shall be prima facie considered as their fair
market value.
12.2.2 In case the shares are valued on a basis lower than their book values, a justification for
the deviation from the book value, together with the evidences in support thereof should be
submitted. The following factors are considered relevant in the valuation of shares of stock of
closed corporations:
a. The nature of the business and the financial history of the enterprise, from the date of the
incorporation;
b. The economic outlook in general and the business condition and outcome of the specific
industry in particular;
c. The financial conditions of the business;
d. The earning capacity of the company;
e. The dividend paying capacity;
f. Goodwill;
g. Sales of stocks and size of the block of stock to be valued;
h. Market price of stocks of corporations engaged in the same or similar line of business to
be valued;
i. Existence of corporate debts in favor of the family of the principal;
j. Restrictive agreements impairing the alienity of the stock;
k. Investments in business or property maintained at a deficit;
l. Dividend arrearages;
m. Voting rights of stockholders; and
n. Difficulty in liquidating the assets.
If such lower fair market valuation is not clearly established and documented, the book value of
the unlisted shares of stocks shall be adopted. If there have been previous bona fide
sales/exchanges of the unlisted shares of stock, the price at which these shares exchange hands
should be taken/considered as its fair market value/s. Preferred shares of stocks shall always be
valued at par.
13. Audit of itemized deductions under Section 86 (A) of the Tax Code:
Require the submission of invoices or official receipts evidencing actual funeral-expenses. Only
actual funeral expenses or an amount equal to 5% of the gross estate whichever is lower, but in
no case shall exceed P200,000, may be allowed as a deduction from gross estate.
Check if the settlement of the estate is the object of judicial testamentary or intestate
proceedings. If not, no deduction for judicial expenses shall be allowed. However, a reasonable
amount for legal fees and accounting expenses incurred in the settlement of the estate of the
decedent may be allowed. Scrutinize legal fees deducted in the estate tax return by checking the
nature of the payment, the person to whom it was paid and the date of payment.
13.3.2 In the verification of claims against the estate, secure certified true copies of the
following documents and verify them:
a. Duly notarized promissory notes or contract of loan signed by the debtor if the loan was
contracted within three (3) years before the death of the decedent.
d. Other documents or evidences relevant to the grant of the loan, i.e., real estate or chattel
mortgage, a copy of the Transfer Certificate of Title to show annotations thereof.
13.3.3 Check the statement submitted by the administrator or executor regarding the disposition
of the proceeds of the loan. If the administrator or executor fails to satisfactorily explain, in
whole or in part, the disposition of the proceeds of the loan contracted within three (3) years
before the death of the decedent, such proceeds or a portion thereof may be included as cash in
the gross estate.
13.3.4 Where the settlement is made through the court in a testate or intestate proceeding,
scrutinize pertinent documents filed with the court evidencing claims against the estate or the
court order approving the said claims, if a decision thereon has already been issued.
13.3.5 Obtain a sworn certification from the creditor as to the exact balance of the liability of the
deceased. The certification must be duly signed by the president, vice-president or other
principal officer of the corporation in case the creditor is a corporation.
13.3.6 Ensure that the creditor agrees in writing allowing the verification by the Revenue
Officer of his pertinent records for the purpose of substantiating the claims against the estate of
the deceased.
13.4.1 Determine if the Accounts, or Notes Receivable has been included as part of the gross
estate. If not, disallow the claim as a deduction.
13.4.2 Find out if the claims against insolvent persons may be considered as conjugal or separate
property of the decedent. In case the claim is the exclusive or paraphernal property of the
decedent, the same should not be considered in the computation of the share of the surviving
spouse.
13.5.1 The prior decedent must have died or the donation must have been made within five (5)
years before the decedent's death.
13.5.2 The property subject to the vanishing deduction must be the same property inherited or
donated from the prior decedent or donor.
13.5.3 The vanishing deduction is based on the value of the property at the time of the donation
or death of the prior decedent or at the time of the death of the present decedent, whichever is
lower. The deduction is based on the value of each individual property.
13.5.4 The estate tax or donor's tax due on the donation or estate of the prior decedent must have
been paid.
Failure to comply with any of the following requisites will result in the disallowance of the
deduction:
13.6.1 The transferee is the government or any political subdivision thereof and the transfer is
exclusively for public purpose.
13.6.2 The transfer must be by way of a last will and testament or donation mortis causa
executed by the deceased before his death.
13.7 Losses
Examine closely the losses being claimed as a deduction from gross estate. Disallow the
deduction if any of the following conditions is absent:
13.7.1 The value of the property lost must have been included in the gross estate.
13.7.2 The loss must not have been compensated for by insurance, in whole or in part.
13.7.3 The loss must not have been claimed as a deduction for income tax.
13.7.4 The loss must have been incurred not later than six (6) months after the decedent's death.
Check the computation for the allowance for Family Home as a deduction from the gross estate
and its corresponding valuation in accordance with RR No. 17-93, to wit:
13.8.1 Valuation of Family Home
The decedent's family home shall be appraised as of the time of his death, at its current or fair
market value or zonal value, whichever is higher.
13.8.2 Conditions for the allowance of family home as a deduction from the gross estate:
a. The family home must be the actual residential home of the decedent and his family at
the time of his death, as certified by the Barangay Captain of the locality where the family home
is situated;
b. The total value of the family home must be included as part of the gross estate of a person
who died on or after July 28, 1992, the date of effectivity of R.A. 7499; and
c. Allowable deduction must be in the amount equivalent to the fair market value or zonal
value of the family home as declared or included in the gross estate but not exceeding
P1,000,000.
To illustrate:
Note: Although the family home is valued at P2 million, the maximum allowable deduction for
the family home is P1 million only.
(Less): Deductions
Other deductions P2,000,000
Family home 800,000
Standard deduction 1,000,000 (3,800,000)
----- -----
Net Taxable Estate P2,000,000
=========
Note: Deduction for family home is allowed for P800,000 only which is the declared value of
the family home.
Conjugal Properties:
Real properties P5,000,000 P5,000,000
Exclusive Properties:
Family home P2,000,000
Other exclusive properties 2,500,000 4,500,000
----- ----- -----
(Less):
Note: Family home allowance of P1,000,000 is considered as one item of deduction after the
computation and deduction of the net share of the surviving spouse in the conjugal property.
c. Same facts and figures as in (b) except for family home which has a fair market
value/zonal value of only P1,500,000.
Share of surviving
spouse:
Conjugal property P6,500,000
Less: Conjugal
deductions 2,000,000
------------
Net conjugal estate P4,500,000
1/2 Share of surviving
spouse (2,250,000) (2,250,000)
Family Home (750,000) (750,000)
Standard deduction (1,000,000) (1,000,000)
--------------- ------------- -------------
Note: Since the fair market value/zonal value of the conjugal family home in the above example
is P1,500,000, the Family Home deduction corresponding to 1/2 of such fair market value/zonal
is P750,000 only.
d. Family home is conjugal property, but lot on which it stands is exclusively property.
(Less): Deductions:
Other deductions (1,000,000) (1,000,000)
Share of surviving
spouse
Conjugal properties P4,000,000
Less: Conjugal
Deductions 1,000,000
-------------
Net conjugal estate P3,000,000
1/2 Share of surviving (1,500,000) (1,500,000)
spouse
Family home and lot P400,000 (500,000) (900,000)
(P500,000 + P400,000)
Standard deduction (1,000,000) (1,000,000)
-------------- --------------- --------------
Net Taxable Estate P2,000,000 P- P2,000,000
========= ========= ========
3. Family home is conjugal property and both spouses died in the same year, leaving three
(3) children:
a. Estate of HUSBAND:
b. Estate of WIFE:
* In addition to 1/2 of the gross estate, the wife had a share as inheritance from the husband
equivalent to the share of each child. Hence, since there were 3 children, the wife had a share of
1/4 on the other half of the estate.
** Vanishing deduction:
Medical expenses incurred by the decedent within one (1) year prior to his death subject to the
following conditions:
b. The deductible amount shall not exceed five hundred thousand pesos (P500,000).
Any amount received by the heirs from the decedent's employer or as a consequence of the death
of the decedent-employee in accordance with Republic Act No. 4917, shall be allowed as a
deduction, provided that such amount is included in the gross estate of the decedent.
13. In case of death of an individual who is a VAT-registered person, verify if the Value-
Added Tax (VAT) has been paid or imposed on the transfer or transmission of the business
assets to the heirs, even if the estate or the heirs of the decedent continue to operate the business.
If the business assets are conjugal, only one-half (1/2), representing the share of the deceased, is
subject to VAT.
D. Donor's Tax
Provided hereunder is an outline of the audit procedures which may be followed by a Revenue
Officer in the processing and verification of donor's tax returns.
1. Determine if the donor's tax return has been filed within thirty (30) days from the date of
donation. If not, impose penalties incident to late filing and late payment of tax.
2. Verify if the donor has made previous donations during the same taxable year from
existing records available in the Revenue District Office or the Assessment Division for purpose
of determining how much is the gross gift to date.
4. If donation involves shares of stocks, verify proper valuation thereof by following the
procedures prescribed under RAMO No. 1-82. (Refer to procedure No. 12 in the
investigation/verification of the estate tax liabilities of the decedent).
6. Ascertain whether the gross gift has been valued either at adjusted fair market value or
zonal value, whichever is higher, at the time of the donation.
7. Determine the relation between the donor and the donee for the imposition of the proper
donor's tax rate.
8. Verify if the donation of the land includes improvements and buildings. Secure a
certification from the Assessor's Office as to the existence or non-existence of improvements on
the real property donated. Donation of land ordinarily includes the improvements unless
specifically excluded in the Deed of Donation.
9.1 Ascertain the correct balance of the indebtedness as of the time of the donation.
9.2 Verify the genuineness of the deduction claimed and require the submission of pertinent
documents in support of the deduction.
9.3 Verify if the assumption of the liability is expressly stipulated in the Deed of Donation
and is duly accepted by the donee. Otherwise, the claimed deduction should be disallowed.
A. Jurisdiction
1.1 The Tax Fraud Division (TFD) shall have jurisdiction to conduct or undertake the
investigation and/or reinvestigation of cases referred to or developed by the Division, and those
assigned referred or approved by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue.
2.1 The SID shall have jurisdiction over the following cases:
a. Tax fraud cases referred to it by the Intelligence and Investigation Service (IIS).
3.1 If in the course of the regular examination of returns, indications of fraud were
discovered, the RDO must transmit the records of the case immediately to the SID which will
conduct the formal investigation thereof.
B. Procedures
A preliminary investigation must first be conducted to establish the prima facie existence of
fraud. This shall include the verification of the allegations on the confidential information and/or
complaints filed, and the determination of the schemes and extent of fraud perpetrated by the
denounced taxpayers.
The formal fraud investigation, which includes the examination of the taxpayers' books of
accounts through the issuance of Letters of Authority, shall be conducted only after the prima
facie existence of fraud has been established.
1.1 Where indications of fraud have been established in a preliminary Investigation, the TFD
through the Assistant Commissioner, Enforcement Service (ES) shall request/recommend the
issuance of the corresponding Letter of Authority by the Commissioner which will automatically
supersede all previously issued Letters of Authority with respect thereto.
1.2 Thereafter, a copy thereof shall be immediately furnished the RDO and/or the SID of the
Revenue Region having jurisdiction over the taxpayer who, upon receipt thereof, must
immediately transmit to the TFD all the documents in their possession relative thereto; and must
withdraw and cancel any issued Letter of Authority pertaining thereto.
No letter of Authority shall be Issued for any taxpayer already covered by a Letter of Authority
issued by the Commissioner.
1.3 Reports on cases recommended for criminal prosecution shall be forwarded to the
Assistant Commissioner, Legal Service, Attn: Litigation and Prosecution Division, through the
Inspection Service (IS). However, if after evaluation, the Litigation and Prosecution Division
resolves that the evidence is not sufficient to warrant the filing of a criminal action against the
taxpayer, the case shall be referred back to the TFD through the IS, for further documentation
and/or appropriate action.
1.4 No Assessment Notice shall be served upon any taxpayer recommended for criminal
prosecution for tax evasion, following the Supreme Court's ruling in the case of Ungab vs. Cusi,
97 SCRA 877.
1.5 All other reports on cases not recommended for criminal prosecution shall be forwarded
to the Commissioner, through the ES, for approval.
2.1 The Chief of the SID shall issue the corresponding Letter of Authority if the prima facie
existence of fraud has been established, and the same has been confirmed by the Regional Tax
Fraud Committee (RTFC), composed of the following:
The RDO shall then desist from issuing any Letter of Authority to the taxpayer concerned, and
shall transmit to the SID all the documents in its possession relative thereto.
However, the RDO may assign one Revenue Officer, whose name shall be included in the Letter
of Authority as the "RDO Assisting Revenue Officer" (RARO), to assist and coordinate with the
SID in the formal investigation.
2.2 Where the SID has established the prima facie existence of fraud against a taxpayer who
has been the subject of an on-going or terminated investigation by the RDO, the SID shall
nevertheless forward the records of the case for evaluation to the RTFC.
If after evaluation the RTFC confirms to the SID the prima facie existence of fraud, the
following procedures shall be followed:
2.2.1 Where the investigation is on-going - the RDO concerned shall withdraw its Letter of
Authority and immediately cease and desist from further investigation. The records of the case
shall then be forwarded to the SID concerned which, thereafter, shall issue a Letter of Authority
and proceed with the formal fraud investigation.
2.2.2 Where investigation is already terminated - the office who has possession of the records
shall, upon written request, immediately forward the records to the SID concerned.
If a re-investigation is necessary, the SID shall forward the same to the IIS with a
recommendation for the issuance of the corresponding Letter of Authority by the Commissioner
of Internal Revenue.
2.3 Where the business activities and/or establishments are situated in more than one revenue
region, the tax fraud case must be referred to the TFD through the IIS.
2.3.1 If a prima facie existence of fraud was not established, after conducting the preliminary
investigation, but a potential deficiency tax assessment exists, the case shall be referred to the
RDO concerned for appropriate action.
2.3.2 Reports on cases recommended for criminal prosecution shall be forwarded to the Legal
Division of the Revenue Region. If after evaluation and the Legal Division resolves that the
evidence is not sufficient to warrant the filing of a criminal action against subject taxpayer, the
case shall be referred back to the SID, for further documentation and/or appropriate action.
2.3.3 Reports on cases not recommended for criminal prosecution shall be forwarded to the
Assessment Division of the Region.
3. Upon discovery of the indication(s) of fraud during the regular examination of the
returns, the Revenue Officer should make a detailed report thereof to Revenue District Officer
who shall immediately transmit the records of the case to the SID.
4. The RDO shall then assign a RARO to assist and coordinate with the SID in the
investigation of the said case.
A. Civil Fraud
In the case the quantum of evidence gathered does not warrant a criminal prosecution because it
is not sufficient to prove the guilt of the taxpayer beyond reasonable doubt, but there exists a
clear and convincing evidence that fraud has been committed, a corresponding 50% surcharge
shall nevertheless be imposed.
Essential to an effective audit of internal revenue tax liabilities is the holding of a closing
conference with the taxpayer before the preparation of the final report of investigation by the
Revenue Officer assigned to the tax case. During this time, the Revenue Officer and his
supervisor explain to the taxpayer how the assessment of his tax liability was arrived at. If
necessary, the records of the case shall be presented to the taxpayer to document the Revenue
Officer's findings. The taxpayer shall then be allowed to examine such records and to present his
arguments. If the taxpayer agrees with the audit findings, he shall be made to sign an Agreement
Form. If not, the Revenue Officer shall give the taxpayer enough time to document his objections
to the proposed assessment. In both cases, the report of investigation shall be prepared and
submitted to the Revenue District Officer for review and pre-approval prior to final review by
the Assessment Division of the Regional Office or by the concerned office in the National Office
(NO) for cases investigated by the audit divisions/teams in the NO.
Upon receipt of the report of investigation, the Revenue District Officer (RDO) or head of the
audit division/team in the NO shall send to the taxpayer a notice for informal conference. The
notice should be accompanied by a summary of the Revenue Officer's findings.
The notice shall be made in writing and sent to the taxpayer at the address indicated in his return
or his last known address. This notice, however, may be dispensed with in case the taxpayer
agrees in writing to the proposed assessment, or where such proposed assessment has been paid.
In case the taxpayer responds to the notice within the period prescribed in the informal
conference letter, he or his duly authorized representative shall again be allowed to examine the
records of the case and to present his arguments in writing protesting the proposed assessment.
Thereafter, the RDO or head of office/team shall, on the basis of the evidence on record, decide
whether or not to approve the report before forwarding it to the Assessment Division or
concerned office in the NO for approval and issuance of the corresponding Termination Letter or
Assessment Notice, as the case may be.
In the event the taxpayer fails to respond to the notice for informal conference within the
prescribed period, or when the response is found to be without merit, the report of investigation
shall be given due course and shall be forwarded to the Assessment Division or to the concerned
office in the NO for review.
The Revenue Officer is required to make a report after the investigation/audit has been
conducted. Before starting to write a report, the Revenue Officer should have in mind a definite
outline as to arrangement in which the facts and evidence may be presented in the most effective
manner. A good general plan is to state the problem, present the results of the investigation and
set forth the conclusions and recommendations.
The report to be prepared by the Revenue Officer in the conduct of his investigation shall contain
the following:
This form, which shall be duly accomplished by the Revenue Officer, indicates the dates when
the docket was received and acted upon.
B. Table of Contents
The table of contents shall indicate the description and page number of each and every document
attached to the report.
C. Narrative Report
This is a memorandum report prepared and submitted by the Revenue Officer. The narrative
report shall contain the following:
1.1 the basis of the authority to investigate, specially the Letter of Authority Number, Tax
Verification Notice Number, or Referral Number, date issued/served and details of referrals or
revalidations, if any;
1.3 profile of the taxpayer, particularly the type of business organization, nature of business,
product line, other sources of income, information of its registration with the SEC, BOI, EPZA,
etc., identification of major owners/stockholders and subsidiaries/affiliates, if relevant, brief
description of accounting system/method used, description of any extraordinary business activity
and kinds and amounts of incentives availed of, if any.
3.2 discrepancies discovered, disallowances made and other relevant facts uncovered during
the examination;
3.3 basis of computation of recommended deficiency taxes/tax credit or refund. if any; and
4. A recommendation for:
4.1 the review/approval of the report of investigation and issuance of termination letter after
collection of the deficiency tax;
These forms are required to be accomplished properly and accurately by the Revenue Officer in
reporting the results of investigation/verification. BIR Forms 1717 are used for non-
computerized district offices while BIR Forms 0500 are prescribed for computerized districts
under the BIR's Integrated Tax System (ITS).
BIR Form 1717A/0500 - This form shall be accomplished by all Revenue Officers in reporting
results of investigation/verification of income tax liabilities of taxpayers.
BIR Form 1717C/0501 - This form is to be used in reporting results of investigation on Capital
Gains Tax on real property transactions.
BIR Form 0509 - This form is to be used in reporting results of investigation on Expanded
Withholding Tax.
BIR Form 1717-X - This form is to be used in reporting results of investigation on Excise Taxes.
BIR Form 0511 - This form is to be used in reporting results of investigation on Specific Excise
Tax.
BIR Form 0512 - This form is to be used in reporting results of investigation on Ad Valorem
Excise Tax.
E. Working Papers
Working papers form the most important portion of a report as they provide all the information
on the investigation conducted. They are the best evidence of the scope of the investigation and
the diligence with which it was completed.
They further constitute the basis for the Revenue Officer's determination of tax liability.
The working papers should include all notes made before, during, and after a tax investigation,
which relates to his findings on a particular tax return and shall include items raised during the
analysis of the return as possible issues. It should also include explanations on the various
observations and analyses of pertinent schedules and information.
Working papers prepared by the Revenue Officer are used as sources of a more detailed
information, which he may use later on as a witness in court in case of litigation. The properly
concluded examination should therefore be reflected by adequate working papers. Memory
should not be relied upon in recounting the facts determined in the investigation.
There is no better way to present the fact that an item or issue has been extensively explored on
except by significant notes in the working papers.
Each of the working papers should be labeled clearly showing the name of the taxpayer, year of
examination, date prepared and the signature of the Revenue Officer should appear on each page.
The pages should be numbered and prepared in the Revenue Officer's own handwriting.
The minimum reportorial requirements regarding the documents, forms, specific schedules and
working papers to be attached to the docket are prescribed in RMO No. 53-98, as shown in the
Appendix of this Manual. They would vary in every case depending upon the type of return,
nature of the business, sources of income, and other similar circumstances.
The requirement is that the working papers should document whatever transpired during the
examination. This would include summaries or transcripts of accounts analyzed, schedule of
specific items checked, reconciliation of accounts, analysis of reserves and all other pertinent
notes of the work performed.
The basic working papers consist of, but are not limited to the following:
3. Reconciliation of net income per financial statements with the net income per income tax
return
6. Schedule of depreciation
Attachments consist of documents that are necessary to the proper understanding and
substantiation of results of the investigation. The documents to be attached to the dockets are
composed of but not limited to:
1. General Requirements
1.1 All tax returns with all the required attachments for the year/period under audit;
1.2 Duplicate copy of Letter of Authority duly received by the taxpayer or his representative;
1.3 Audited financial statements with supporting schedules and reconciliation statements for
the period under investigation;
1.10 Photocopy of Payment Form and Official Receipt as evidence of deficiency tax payment;
1.12 Post reporting notice/notice for an informal conference with the summary of findings (for
non-agreed assessment);
1.15 Delinquency verification report [for claims for refund/Tax Credit Certificate (TCC)]; and
APPENDIX
ATTACHMENTS
June 9, 1995
A. OBJECTIVE
To provide the policies and rules in the manner of investigating tax fraud cases by the Tax Fraud
Division (TFD), Special Investigation Division (SIDs) and the Revenue District Offices (RDOs)
for criminal prosecution, and to avoid the multiple issuances of Letter of Authority and/or
simultaneous investigation of the same taxpayer covering the same taxable year.
All revenue officer concerned shall be guided by the updated "Guidelines and Investigative
Procedures in the Development of Tax Fraud Cases for Internal Revenue Officers", hereto
attached as Annex "A".
B. JURISDICTION
1.1. The Tax Fraud Division shall have the jurisdiction to conduct or undertake the
investigation and/or reinvestigation of cases referred to or developed by the Division, and those
assigned, referred or approved by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue.
2.1.1. Tax fraud cases referred to it by the Intelligence and Investigation Service (IIS)
2.1.2 Tax fraud cases initiated and developed by the SID.
2.1.3 Tax fraud cases referred to it by the RDO.
3.1. If in the course of the regular examination of returns, indication of fraud were discovered,
the RDO must transmit the records of the case immediately to the SID and provide assistance in
the formal investigation thereof.
C. PROCEDURE
A Preliminary Investigation must first be conducted to establish the prima facie existence of
fraud. This shall include the verification of the allegations on the confidential information and/or
complaints filed, and the determination of the schemes and extent of fraud perpetrated by the
denounced taxpayers.
The Formal Fraud Investigation, which includes the examination of the taxpayers books of
accounts through the issuance of Letters of Authority, shall be conducted only after the prima
facie existence of fraud has been established.
1.1. Where indications of fraud have been established in a preliminary investigation, the TFD
thru the Assistant Commissioner, Intelligence and Investigation Service (IIS), shall
request/recommend the issuances of the corresponding Letter of Authority by the Commissioner
which will automatically supersede all previously issued Letter of Authority with respect thereto.
1.2 Thereafter, a copy thereof shall be immediately furnished the RDO and/or the SID of the
Revenue Region having jurisdiction over the taxpayer, who upon receipt thereof, must
immediately transmit to the TFD all the documents in their possession relative thereto; and must
withdraw and cancel any issued Letter of Authority therefor.
No Letter of Authority shall be issued for any taxpayer already covered by a Letter of Authority
issued by the Commissioner.
1.3. Reports on cases recommended for criminal prosecution shall be forwarded to the
Assistant Commissioner, Legal Service, Attn: Litigation and Prosecution Division, thru the IIS.
However, if after evaluation the Litigation and Prosecution Division resolves that the evidence is
not sufficient to warrant the filing of a criminal action against subject taxpayer, the case shall be
referred back to the TFD thru the IIS, for further documentation and/or appropriate action..
1.4. No Assessment Notice shall be served upon any taxpayer recommended for criminal
prosecution for tax evasion, following the Supreme Court's ruling in the case of Ungab vs. Cusi,
97 SCRA 877.
1.5. All other reports on cases not recommended for criminal prosecution shall be forwarded
to the Commissioner, thru the IIS, for approval.
2.1. The Chief of the SID shall issue the corresponding Letter of Authority if the prima facie
existence of fraud has been established, and the same has been confirmed by the Regional Tax
Fraud Committee (RTFC), composed of the following:
The RDO shall then desist from issuing any Letter of Authority to the taxpayer concerned, and
shall transmit to the SID all the documents in its possession relative thereto.
However, the RDO may assign one Revenue Officer, whose name shall be included in the Letter
of Authority as the "RDO" Assisting Revenue Officer" (RARO), to assist and coordinate with
the SID in the formal investigation.
2.2. Where the SID has established the prima facie existence of fraud against a taxpayer who
has been the subject of an on-going or terminated investigation by the RDO, the SID shall
nevertheless forward the record of the records of the case for evaluation to the RTFC.
If after evaluation the RTFC confirms to the SID the prima facie existence of fraud, the
following procedures shall be followed:
2.2.1. Where the investigation is on-going - the RDO concerned shall withdraw its Letter of
Authority and immediately cease and desist from further investigation. The records of the case
shall then be forwarded to the SID concerned which, thereafter, shall issue a Letter of Authority
and proceed with the formal fraud investigation.
2.2.2. Where investigation is already terminated - the office who has the possession of the
records shall, upon written request, immediately forward the records to the SID concerned.
If a re-investigation is necessary, the SID shall forward the same to the IIS with a
recommendation for the issuance of the corresponding Letter of Authority by the Commissioner
of Internal Revenue.
2.3. Where the business activities and/or establishments are situated in more than one revenue
region, the tax fraud case must be referred to the TFD thru the IIS.
2.4 If after conducting the preliminary investigation the prima facie existence of fraud cannot
be established, but a potential deficiency tax assessment exists, the case shall be referred to the
RDO concerned for appropriate action.
2.5. Reports on cases recommendation for criminal prosecution shall be forwarded to the
Legal Division of the Revenue Region. If after evaluation the Legal Division resolves that the
evidence is not sufficient to warrant the filing of a criminal action against subject taxpayer, the
case shall be referred back to the SID, for further documentation and/or appropriate action.
2.6 Reports on cases not recommended for criminal prosecution shall be forwarded to the
Assessment Division of the Region.
3.1 Upon discovery of the indication(s) of fraud during the regular examination of the
returns, the Revenue Officer should make a detailed report thereof to the Revenue District
Officer who shall immediately transmit the records of the case to the SID.
3.2 The RDO shall then assign a RARO to assist and coordinate with the SID in the
investigation of the said case.
D. CIVIL FRAUD
In case the quantum of evidence gathered does not warrant a criminal prosecution because it is
not sufficient to prove the guilt of the taxpayer beyond reasonable doubt there exists a clear and
convincing evidence that fraud has been committed, a corresponding 50% surcharge shall
nevertheless be imposed.
E. ATTRIBUTION OF COLLECTION
All collections arising out of the investigations by the TFD and SID, the latter either by itself or
through coordination with the RDO, shall be attributed to the RDO having jurisdiction over the
taxpayer.
F. PENAL CLAUSE
Strict compliance with this RMO is hereby enjoined. Any willful violation hereof shall be treated
as gave misconduct and the corresponding penalty of dismissal as provided under Civil Service
Rules and Regulations shall be imposed.
G. REPEALING CLAUSE
Any provision of any order and pertinent issuances inconsistent with his Order is hereby
revoked, modified or amended accordingly.
H. EFFECTIVITY
ANNEX "A"
A. OBJECTIVES:
The substantial revenue collections of the government derived from the series of tax amnesties
signify to a large that the BIR has not effectively tapped a great number of potential sources of
revenue. The tremendous shortfall in revenue collections for the preceding year should spur the
BIR on the need for a more systematic and vigorous tax campaign by instilling more awareness
and tax consciousness among our taxpayers, more especially those who have continuously
flaunted our revenue laws with impunity.
To provide a strong detergent to the commission of fraud against the revenues for the purpose of
increasing and enhancing our revenue collections, the imposition of criminal sanctions, in
addition to the civil liabilities, on erring taxpayers should be implemented to the fullest extent of
the law in line with the pronouncement of the President of the Philippines.
These guidelines are, therefore, presented to guide and to refresh all internal revenue officers
with the necessary know-how in the investigation, evaluation, and submission of reports of fraud
cases envisioned to withstand judicial scrutiny.
Definition-fraud or evasion -
Tax fraud or evasion means the elimination or reduction of one's correct and proper tax by
fraudulent means. "The fraud contemplated by law is actual and not constructive. It must be
intentional fraud, consisting of deception willfully and deliberately done or resorted to in order to
induce another to give some legal right . . . "Aznar vs. CTA and Collector, G.R. No. L-20569,
Aug. 25, 1974.
1. The end to be achieved - the payment of less tax than that known by the taxpayer to be
legally due:
2. The accompanying state of mind which is variously described as being "evil", "in bad
faith", "deliberate and not accident", or "willful" - the exact term used is not too important.
3. The overt act done or scheme used by the taxpayer to achieve the non-payment of taxes
known to be due. The act or scheme must be tinged with some elements of deceit,
misrepresentation, trick, device, concealment or dishonesty." Fraud under Tax, Balter.
In the establishment of fraud, the burden of proof is on the Bureau of Internal Revenue. The
presumption that an officer of the government has performed his duty regularly (Sections 5, Rule
131 of the New Rules of Court), as in the case of the correctness of deficiency assessments, is
not applicable in fraud cases. "In criminal cases, the burden of proof as to the offense charged
lies on the prosecution." (Section 2, Rules 131, New Rules of Court).
Mere suspicious and mere doubts on the intention of the taxpayer are not sufficient proof of
fraud. Fraud is never presumed, it must be proved.
Criminal Fraud -
A criminal tax fraud case results when all the elements of fraud can be proven beyond reasonable
doubt. Proof beyond reasonable doubt not mean such a degree of proof as, excluding possibility
of error, absolute certainty; only required, or that degree of proof which produces conviction in
an unprejudiced mind.
Here, the taxpayer upon conviction shall be liable from the deficiency taxes, to both criminal and
civil penalties.
Civil Fraud -
A civil tax fraud case results when all the elements of fraud cannot be proven beyond reasonable
doubt, but rather by clear an convincing evidence amounting to more than a mere preponderance,
and cannot be justified by mere speculation.
"Preponderance of evidence" means that the testimony adduced by one side is more credible and
conclusive than that of the other.
"Clear and convincing" need not rise to proof beyond reasonable doubt as in a criminal case but
yet must be stronger than mere preponderance of evidence.
Here, the taxpayer shall be liable aside from the deficiency taxes only to the civil penalties.
1. Civil penalties rise to the imposition of the 50% surcharge; to be imposed by the BIR;
2. Criminal penalties involving the imposition of penal sanctions - imprisonment and/or fine
to be imposed by the Regional Trial Court (RTC) upon conviction;
3. Power of the Commissioner to asses and collect the tax is extended to 10 year from date
of discovery, however, Sec. 280 provides the five year prescription on the filing of criminal
action;
4. Cases involving fraud cannot be the subject compromise as mandated by Section 204,
NIRC;
5. Suspension and temporary closure of the business operations of a taxpayer under Sections
111 of Tax Code for violation of the VAT provisions.
1. The Direct Approach Method or by Direct Evidence, also called Specific Item Cases -
Proof of fraudulent acts are adduced by specific items of fraudulent transactions. It is that one, if
the allegations are believed, the existence of the principal or ultimate fact is proven without any
inference or presumption.
Specific Item Cases determined by the direct approach method -
1.1.1.2 Items of income and expenses, or assets or liabilities have been omitted, or falsely
claimed in the accounting records or return in order to minimize or reduce taxes;
1.1.1.3 Misclassification of accounts - Income taken upon and classified as liabilities; erroneous
classification of income from taxable to exempt; ordinary gains classified as capital gains; non-
deductible expenses disguised as deductible items; and capital expenditures classified as
deductible items.
1.1.1.4 Sales/Income of domestic branches purportedly shown as income of the foreign head
office;
1.1.1.5 Keeping two sets of invoice or receipts - one set registered with the BIR and sales or
income recorded thereon are the ones posted in the accounting records, whereas the other set is
not reported for tax purposes;
1.1.1.6 Keeping two sets of books of accounts records - one set registered with the BIR and the
other set reflects the correct transactions and not registered and reported to the BIR;
1.1.1.8 Sales invoices or receipts issued to customers reflects the correct transactions, but
invoices or receipts recorded for tax purposes reflects much smaller amounts.
1.1.2.2 Allocating income and expenses to other persons in order to reduce or minimize taxes by
a controlling person; and
1.1.3.1 Fictions purchaser, or padding of purchaser, or that proceeds are diverted to the personal
benefit of the taxpayer or his assign;
1.1.3.8 Improper claims of tax credits without having paid the input taxes passed on by the seller.
Claiming false additional exemptions of alleged children, or children who are already of age or
who are not physically incapacitated.
1.2.1.3 Non-issuance of sales invoices, or under- recording of sales to conceal the amount of
sales subject to business taxes on VAT;
1.2.1.5 Crediting sales against items or income discounts of costs of sales to conceal the amount
of sales subject to business taxes on VAT.
1.2.1.6 Deducting against sales or income discounts which were granted subsequently and not in
the sales invoice.
1.2.2.2 Misclassification of sales of goods subject to VAT as only subject to percentage taxes;
1.2.2.3 Claiming domestic sales as export sales when in fact the goods were sold in the domestic
market; and
1.2.2.4 Sales in the local market which are made to appear as sales by the foreign head office.
Materials were applied against originally imported for re-export, but which were used instead on
goods sold in the local market.
1.3.2. Filing of estate tax returns in different jurisdictions to avoid payment of the higher
graduated tax, as in the case where the deceased-owned properties in various places;
1.3.3 Willful under-valuation of the market values of the properties of the estate;
1.3.4 Willful omission of some properties especially those located in places other than the
residence of the deceased; and
1.3.5 Claim of fictions items - funeral expenses, claims against the estate, judicial and
testamentary expenses.
1.4.2 Filing of returns within the same year in various jurisdictions to evade the payment of the
higher graduated tax;
1.4.3 Willful omission of prior donations made during the same taxable year;
1.4.4 Willful undervaluation of the market value of the property donated, and
1.4.5 Insufficient consideration on sales of property, the difference between the market value
from the consideration agreed upon, considered as subject to the donor's tax.
1.5.1 Misclassification of articles subject to excise tax by making it appear that a particular
manufactured articles falls within a lower tax classification;
1.5.6 Shipment or removal of liquor or tobacco products under false names or brands or as an
imitation of any existing or otherwise known product name or brand.
Failure to withhold the correct taxes as withholding agent under the pertinent provisions of the
Tax Code.
The legal bases for an indirect approach in the determination of the correct income or
transactions of a anchored on Sections 16 and 37 of NIRC of 1988.
This is a method of reconstructing income based on the theory that if the taxpayer's net worth has
increased in a given year in an amount larger than his reported income, he had understand his
income for that year.
Formula:
The mathematical formula for this method may be laid down as follows:
The Commissioner's determination of taxpayer's unreported income through the net worth
expenditure method usually involves the following steps:
(1) The net worth on a fixed starting date is established (excess of assets over liabilities).
This starting date is usually the beginning of the first tax year under examination. The amount of
such net worth is considered of vital importance in order to foreclose the possibility than an
increase in net worth during the tax year, or an excess of expenditure over reported income, did
not originate from prior accumulated funds (i.e. hoarded cash or undisclosed assets which would
not represent income during the tax year.)
(2) The net worth at the close of each tax year under examination is established;
(3) Comparison is made of the net worth at the beginning and end of each year, to determine
the increase, if any;
(4) The increase in net worth for each year is adjusted to eliminate items accounting for such
increases which arise from non-tax sources (i.e., gifts, bequests, other receipts exempt from tax,
etc.) and adjustment is made where property is sold at a profit but the entire profit is not taxable
because of long-term capital gain provision. The increase in net worth for the year, after these
eliminations and adjustments, is presumed to be income realized in that year;
(6) The reconstructed income under the net worth expenditure method is the sum of items (4)
and (5) and this amount is then compared with the income reported, if any, by the taxpayer. (Id.
par. 6059, see also Perez vs. Araneta, L-10507, May 30, 1958, Reyes vs. Col. of Internal Rev., L-
11534 and L-11558, Nov. 25, Jamir vs. Col of Int. Rev. L-16552, Mar. 30, 1962; Avelino vs.
Col. of Int. Rev. L-17715, July 31, 1963).
Circumstance and conditions necessary to warrant the use of the indirect method in establishing a
prima facie case of fraud:
(1) That the taxpayer's accounting records are inadequate and do not clearly reflects his
income; of that the taxpayer maintains no books and records; or that taxpayer's accounting
records are available, but he refuses to produce them;
(2) That there is a fixed starting point or opening net worth, i.e., a date beginning of a taxable
year or prior year to it,
at which time the taxpayer's financial conditions can be affirmatively established with some
definitives; (Statements of net worth of taxpayers who availed of the tax amnesty under the
provisions of Executive Order No. 41, may be used as the starting point as at December 31,
pursuant to the authority given to the BIR under section 7 of said Executive Order)
(3) That the circumstances are such that the method does reflect the taxpayer's income with
reasonable accuracy and certainly, and proper and just addition of personal expenses and other
non-deductible expenditures were made and correct; fair and equitable credit adjustments were
given by way of eliminating non-taxable items or receipts or taxable income which have been
subjected to final tax.
(4) The need for evidence of the source of income under this method:
"In all the leading cases on this matter, courts are unanimous in holding that when the tax case is
civil in nature, direct proof of sources of income is not essential. . . . However, when a taxpayer
is criminally prosecuted for tax evasion, the need for evidence of a likely source of income
becomes a pre-requisite for a successful prosecution . . ." RMC No. 43-74.
This proof of a likely source of income may be shown by any of the following:
(1) Demonstrating that there were specific omissions of income items by the taxpayer in his
income tax return.
(2) A showing that the nature of the taxpayer's business is such that it has capacity of
generating a substantial income.
(3) Proofs of underdeclaration of income by the existence of unregistered sales invoices,
which were not recorded in the books;
(4) Findings of unrecorded purchases;
(5) Existence of business permits, license from government agencies as to the types of
businesses the taxpayer is engaged in;
(6) Keeping separate sets of books - one registered and the other reflecting the correct
transactions of a business.
(7) Use of false invoices or documents, and
(8) Willful destruction of accounting records.
The expenditures method proceeds on the theory that where the amount of money which a
taxpayer spends during a given year exceeds his reported income, and the source of such money
is otherwise unexplained, it may be inferred that such expenditures represent unreported income.
The discussion on when and how the net worth method should be used are equally applicable to
the expenditures method. In a case where the taxpayer has several assets (and liabilities) whose
cost bases remain the same throughout the period under investigation, the expenditure method
may be preferred over the net worth method because a more laconic presentation can be made of
the computation of taxable income. This is because assets and liabilities which do not change
during the period under investigation may be omitted from the expenditures statement. The
expenditures method is used often on a taxpayer who spends his income on lavish living and has
little, if any, net worth.
Formula:
The expenditure method of determining income should be applied by deducting the aggregate
yearly expenditures from the declared yearly income (Col. of Int. Rev. vs. Jamir, 4 SCRA 7;8
March 30, 1962).
Under this formula enunciated by the court in the above-cited case, the particular in the use of
this method are shown below:
B. Sources of Cash:
As in the case of the Net Worth Method, when a tax case is civil in nature, direct proof of
sources of income is not essential. However, when a criminal case is filed against the taxpayer,
the need for evidence of a likely source of income becomes a prerequisite.
3. Percentage Method
Although the use of this method is of little value in criminal cases, it is useful in test-checking or
corroborating the results obtained by some other means of proof such as specific items, net
worth, and expenditures methods, and for evaluating allegations from information regarding
unreported profits or income.
The percentage method is a computation whereby determinations are made by the use of
percentages or ratios considered typical of the business under investigation. By reference to
similar businesses or situations, percentage computations are secured to determine sales, gross
profit, or even net profit. Likewise; by the use of some known base and the typical percentage
applicable, individual items of income or expenses may be determined.
These percentage may be externally derived or they may in some instances be internally derived
from the taxpayers accounts for other periods or from an analysis of subsidiary records. Gross
profit percentages may be other similar data. Also other years not covered by the investigation or
portion of year under investigation may indicate typical percentage applicable to the entire year
or year under investigation.
This is not a prime method of proof. The determination or verification of gross receipts may be
computed by applying price and profit figures to the known ascertainable quality of business
done by the taxpayer.
This method is feasible when the investigation can ascertain the number of units handled by the
taxpayer and also when he knows the price or profit charged per unit.
There may be regulatory body to which the taxpayer units of production or service.
Examples are:
b. Standard of living of the taxpayer, such as the possession of expensive cars and jewelries;
or staying in a luxurious mansion, and, ownership of properties whose values far exceed his
probable sources of income as declared per return;
d. False vouches and receipts which were verified in the course of the routine examination.
a. An informant who has knowledge of the transactions of the taxpayer which were not
properly declared for tax purposes;
b. Referrals from other government offices or from other investigating units of the BIR.
b. Thru research of available government records such as from offices of the Register of
Deeds, Bureau of Highways, and other government offices; and
E. INDICATIONS OF FRAUD
1. Maintaining two sets of books and records;
2. Concealment of Assets;
3. Destruction of books and records;
4. Large or frequent currency transactions;
5. Payments to fictions companies or persons;
6. False or altered entries and documents;
7. Overdeclaration of purchases or under declaration of sales;
8. Use of false names or nominees;
9. Large company loans to employees or other persons;
10. Payee names on checks left blank and inserted at a later date;
11. Excessive billing accounts;
12. Excessive spoilage or defects;
13. Double payment on billing;
14. An individual negotiating checks made payable to corporation;
15. Second or third party endorsement on corporate checks;
16. Excessive use of exchange checks or clearing accounts;
17. Personal expenses paid with corporate fund;
18. An understatement of income attributable to specific transactions and denial by the
taxpayer of the receipt of the income or inability to provide a satisfactory explanation for its
omission;
19. Substantial unexplained increases in network over a period of years;
20. Failure to file a return, especially for a period of several years although substantial
amounts of income were received;
21. Concealment of bank accounts, brokerage accounts, and other property;
22. Inadequate explanation for dealing in large sums of currency, or the unexplained
expenditure of currency, (especially when in a business not calling for large amounts of cash);
23. Failure to deposit receipt to business account contrary to normal practices;
24. Claiming fictions or improper deductions;
25. Substantial amount of personal expenditure deducted as business expenses;
26. False entries or alternation made on the books and records, backdated or postdated
documents, false entries or invoices or statement, or other false documents;
27. Failure to keep records, especially if put on notices by the BIR as a result of prior
examination, concealment of records or refusal to make certain records available.
28. Distribution of profits to fictions partners;
29. False statements, especially if made under oath about a material fact involved in the
investigation;
30. Attempt to hinder the investigation. Failure to answer pertinent questions or repeated
cancellations of appointments. Avoiding the investigator;
31. The taxpayers knowledge of taxes and business practices where numerous questionable
items appear on the returns;
32. Destruction of books and records, especially after the investigation was started;
33. Transfer of assets for purposes of concealment;
34. Involvement in illegal activity (illegal income);
35. Failure to disclose all relevant facts;
36. Unsubstantiated or unexplained wealth;
37. Mental handling of ones affair to avoid keeping records usual in transactions of the sale
kind;
38. Keeping no records or inadequate despite substantial transactions in the return; and
39. Any conduct, the likely effect would be mislead or to conceal material facts.
The items listed are the indications of fraud most commonly committed but are not all inclusive.
1. Preliminary Investigation
The purpose of preliminary investigation is to establish the existence of a prima facie indications
of fraud. To gather evidence therefor the courses of action that may be conducted pursuant to the
pertinent Tax Code provision, are but not limited to the following:
The examiner or revenue official who discovers a potential tax fraud case must submit a
memorandum report to his immediate superior stating the facts and circumstances which
constitute the indication of fraud, and the evidence at hand to be verified and confirmed.
The issuances and approvals of Letters of Authority for fraud cases shall be in accordance with
existing rules and regulations on such issuances. The issuance of Letters of Authority, in the case
of the Tax Fraud Division, may be dispensed with when so warranted by the circumstance of the
case, provided that the taxpayer shall be noticed by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue that
his internal revenue tax liabilities are under investigation or that the report thereon has been
submitted.
(b) Deciding the particular provision of the NIRC allegedly violated and asking by whom,
when, where, and by what means. Were Revenue Regulations, Revenue Memorandum Circulars
or BIR Rulings and Issuances also violated or involved;
(c) Obtain pertinent records such as General Information Sheet Articles of Incorporations,
Constitution and By-Laws, Financial other information from Bureau of Domestic Trade,
Department of Trade and industry and other government agencies.
The table of contents should indicate the subject matter, and page number in the docket, to
provide quick reference to important features of the case.
The format of the report must more or less contain the following information and presentation
whenever it is necessary:
The body of the report should contain a reference to the appendices or worksheets and schedules,
the appendices should contain a reference to exhibits which consist of supporting documents. For
example: "Appendix A is a summary of the unreported receipts from sales, and Exhibits 8 to 25
are copies of documents in support thereof" Important matters in the exhibits generally should be
explained in the report. However, if a document is of the nature that it is adequately described in
an appendix no further explanation is necessary. When mentioning or referring to a document
that is submitted as an exhibit, including the written statement of a witness, insert the exhibit
number in parenthesis immediately following the reference.
The examiner, before beginning his report, should arrange the proposed appendices and exhibits
in the order of his planned presentation of facts and evidence, and then he prepares his report
discussing the appendices and exhibits in that order. When the report is completed, the exhibits
should be assembled in the order in which they are originally mentioned in the report, and they
should be numbered for easy reference.
The list of witnesses is an essential part of a report in a criminal case. The witness may be listed
in alphabetical order, or in the order in which they are mentioned in the report, or in the probable
order of their appearance in the trial. Give each witness a number. Give each piece of evidence
and the witness proposed testimony a separate exhibit number. (For example, please see Annex
"A-2")
Appendices, worksheets and schedules should be arranged in the order of presentation facts and
evidence of the case. And they should be numbered for easy reference. (For sample, please see
Annex "A-3")
Annex "A-1"
LIABILITIES
1. Accounts, Notes & Loans Payable Pxxxx Pxxxx
2. Mortgage, Payable xxxx xxxx
3. Other Liabilities xxxx xxxx
---------- ----------
Total Liabilities Pxxxx Pxxxx
----------- -----------
Net Worth at the End Pxxxx Pxxxx
====== =======
Less:
CASH ANALYSIS
(Revised to conform with provisions of recent laws)
- 1994 -
Source of Funds -
*7 Source: This item should be included as a contra account to Item No. 1 of Application of
Funds if it includes non-cash deductions such as depreciation, bad debts, applications of deferred
items.
Thus, if item 1 of Application of Founds does not reflect non-cash deductions, there is no
necessity to include Item 7 to Sources of Funds.
ANNEX "A-2"
SAMPLE
LIST OF WITNESSES and EXHIBIT
SING and FURR, INC.
No. 24 Changi Street, Manila
EXHIBIT REF.
ANNEX "A-3"
SAMPLE
APPENDIX A
COMPUTATION OF UNREPORTED GROSS RECEIPTS - 1990, 1991
SING and FURR, INC.
CONTEMPLATE
CORP. 1000,0000 1,600,0000 EMILLE FRENILLE W5-1 P. 22
Worksheet
Comptroller W5-2P P. 23-30 Invoices
CONTEMPLATE
CORP. W5-3 PP. 31-36 Cancelled
Checks
MAGGS ENTER-
PRISE 500,0000 75,000.00 SANDREX DUTERTE W6-1 P. 38
Worksheet
Manager, MAGGS
ENT. W6-2 PP. 39-46 Invoices
ANNEX "A-3"
SAMPLE
APPENDIX B
COMPUTATION OF ADJUSTED TAXABLE INCOME 1990 & 1991
SING and FURR, INC.
ADD: UNRE-
PORTED
GROSS RE-
CEIPTS 240,000.00 355,000.00 Atty. CARLS APPENDIX P. 84
Computation of
MIRANDA, JR. A Unreported
--------------- ------------ - Intelligence Officer Gross
Receipts
SUB-TOTAL 336,000.00 472,800.00
LESS: ADDI-
TIONAL
EXPENSES
OR DEDUC-
TIONS - -
--------------- ---------------
ADJUSTED P336,000.00 P4728,00.00 TO APPENDIX C
TAXABLE
INCOME ======== ========
ANNEX "A-3"
SAMPLE
APPENDIX C
COMPUTATION OF DEFICIENCY TAXES - 1990, 1991
SING and FURR, INC.
INCOME TAX
--------------------
I. BACKGROUND
It has been observed that for the same kind of tax audit case, Revenue Officers differ in their
request for requirements from taxpayers as well as in the attachments to the dockets resulting to
tremendous complaints from taxpayers and confusion among tax auditors and reviewers.
For equity and uniformity, this Bureau comes up with a prescribed list of requirements from
taxpayers, per kind of tax, as well as of the internally prepared reporting requirements, all of
which comprise a complete tax docket.
II. OBJECTIVE
b. Identify the different audit reporting requirements to be prepared, submitted and attached
to a tax audit docket.
Percentage Tax
- Annex C (2 pages)
Estate Tax
- Annex E (4 pages)
Donor's Tax
- Annex F (2 pages)
Withholding Tax Remittance Return/Capital Gains Tax Return/Documentary Stamp Tax (For
transactions involving onerous transfer of real property)
- Annex G (2 pages)
Capital Gain's Tax Return/Documentary Stamp Tax (For transactions involving onerous transfer
of shares of stock not traded through a local stock exchange)
- Annex H (1 page)
Withholding Tax Remittance Return/Capital Gains Tax Return (For transactions involving
onerous transfer of motor vehicles)
- Annex I (1 page)
It is to be emphasized that before a docket be released by an investigating office, each and every
page thereof be consecutively numbered.
It is worth mentioning, likewise, that an investigating Revenue Officer/Tax Auditor must always
request for the presentation of books of accounts, and accounting/business records, specifically,
records affecting the income, receipts, deductions, estate and other taxable transaction of a
taxpayer during the audit.
All existing issuances or parts thereof which are inconsistent herewith are hereby repealed.
V. EFFECTIVITY
ANNEX A
1) Certified Financial Statements, including comparative Profit and Loss Statement with
Statement of Cost of Goods Manufactured and Sold, if applicable
6) Certificate of Registration issued by the appropriate regulatory agency, together with the
conditions attached to such registration, if applicable
9) Xerox copy of used Tax Credit Certificate with annotation of issued TDM at the back, if
applicable
a) current year/period
b) previous year/period
11) Reports submitted to applicable regulatory agency that reflects the financial condition
and result of operation of the taxpayer e.g., Annual Statement prepared by insurance companies
submitted to the Insurance Commission etc., if applicable
2) Duly filed Income Tax Return with all the required attachments (Account Information
Form, Schedule of Taxes and Licenses, Schedule of Income Producing Properties, Schedule of
Depreciation, Breakdown of Selling and Administrative Expenses, etc.).
10) Duly validated Annual Withholding Tax Returns together with the required attachments
(Alpha List)
16) Working Papers of the monthly debit and credit balances of all accounts duly signed by
the Tax Auditors/Revenue Officers
17) Working Papers showing computation of income and/or withholding taxes due duly
signed by the Tax
Auditors/Revenue Officers
19) Schedule of Interest Expense and Loans / Notes Payable (mention the creditor/s, date
contracted/granted, principal loan, interest rate and interest expense), if applicable
29) Computation of Realized Gross Profit and Unrealized Gross Profit, if the taxpayer is
engaged in the business of selling real estate, whether by installment or lump sum
30) Computation of Realized Gross Profit and Unrealized Gross Profit, if the taxpayer is
engaged in the business of selling personal properties by installment
33) Reconciliation of the Financial Statements' figures with the Withholding Tax Returns'
and Information Returns' figures
a) current year/period
b) previous year/period
40) Authority to Issue Refund / TCC ( for Claims for Refund / TCC )
42) Certification by the Revenue District Office, that he could not locate the BIR copy of the
tax return etc., if applicable
43) Result of Tax Mapping Program or Third Party Information Program for LAs/Audit
Notices issued thereunder
Note:
In case of non-availability of documents from RDO / RDC mentioned in B.2 - B.11, request
photocopies thereof from taxpayer
ANNEX B-1
3) Photocopies of VAT purchase invoices for purchase of goods and official receipts for
purchase of services. (The invoices/official receipts must be arranged according to the summary
list)
4) Summary of importations made during the period with the following details:
6) VAT Returns filed for the quarter showing that the amount applied for refund/TCC has
been reflected as a deduction from the total available input tax, as well as VAT Return for the
succeeding quarter
7) Certification of taxpayer showing the amount of Zero-rated Sales, Taxable Sales and
Exempt Sales
8) A statement showing the amount and description of the sale of goods and services, name
of persons or entities (except in case of exports) to whom the goods or services were sold and
date of the transaction, where the applicant 's zero-rated transactions are regulated by certain
government agency
13) Certification from BOI, DOF, BOC, EPZA, etc., that subject taxpayer has not filed
similar claim for refund covering the same period
14) Sworn statement that ending inventory as of the close of the period covered by the Claim
has been used directly or indirectly in the products subsequently exported as supported by export
documents, if the applicant is 100% exporter
15) Documents of liquidation evidencing the actual utilization of the raw materials in the
manufacture of goods at least 70% of which has been actually exported, if the applicant is an
indirect exporter
16) Copy of the ITR and Certified Financial Statements, if applicable
17) Beginning and ending inventory of raw materials, work-in-process, finished goods,
supplies and materials
a. sales invoice number, name of buyer, airway bill / bill of lading number, lading date,
amount of sales in foreign currency, peso value of sales, conversion rate, date of remittance,
bank credit memo number and amounted remitted in pesos
1) Invoices/ receipts evidencing sale of goods, as well as the name of the person to whom
the goods were delivered with respect to foreign currency denominated sales
2) export declaration/permit
c. accredited agent bank showing that the proceeds of the sale in acceptable foreign
currency had been inwardly remitted and accounted for in accordance with BSP rules and
regulations. The statement should also show the amount in foreign currency of the export
proceeds or consideration, date of export, date of inward remittance, conversion rate into
Philippine currency and the total peso value thereof.
a. Authenticated copy/ies of the contract/s showing the person/s for whom the services were
rendered, amount of consideration, description of the services and documents evidencing actual
payments
b. Photocopies of official receipts and billings together with a summary of the date of
billing, name of principal, official receipt number, date of receipt, amount in foreign currency
and the corresponding value thereof, date of remittance, name of bank, bank credit memo
number and amount remitted in pesos
c. Bank credit memoranda and certificate from the BSP with information similar to 1-c
(export sales)
a) Summary of Sales invoices/receipts showing the name of the person entity to whom the
sale of goods or services were delivered, order of delivery, amount of consideration and
description of goods or services delivered (RR 6-89 and RMC 2-90)
a) Original copies of invoices/receipts showing the date of purchase, purchase price, amount
of value-added tax paid and description of the capital equipment locally purchased
Note:
In case of non-availability of documents from RDO / RDC mentioned in B.2 - B.6, request
photocopies thereof from taxpayer
ANNEX C
3) Xerox copy of used Tax Credit Certificate (TCC) with annotation of issued Tax Debit
Memo (TDM) at the back
a) current year/period
b) previous year/period
6) Certificate of Registration issued by the appropriate regulatory agency, together with the
conditions attached to such registration, if applicable
7) Certification of the appropriate regulatory agency as to the exempt sales of the taxpayer
under its regulatory supervision, if applicable
2) Duly validated Percentage Tax Returns, including all the attachments thereto
7) Table of Contents
8) Working papers showing the computation of the taxable receipts/sales (tax base) and
percentage tax due duly signed by the Tax Auditors/Revenue Officers
13) Post Reporting Notice/Notice for an Informal Conference with the SUMMARY OF
FINDINGS (for non-agreed assessment)
a) current year/period
b) previous year/period
Note:
In case of non-availability of documents from RDO / RDC mentioned in B.2 - B.3, request
photocopies thereof from taxpayer
ANNEX D
2) Xerox copy of used Tax Credit Certificate (TCC) with annotation of issued TDM at the
back, if applicable
b) previous year/period
9) Table of Contents
10) Working Papers showing details and computation of tax base duly signed by Tax
Auditors/Revenue Officers
11) Working Papers showing computation of Documentary Stamps Tax Due duly signed by
Tax Auditors/Revenue Officers
14) Notice for an Informal Conference / Post Reporting Notice with the Summary of
Findings (for non-agreed assessment)
a) current year/period
b) previous year/period
In case of non-availability of documents from RDO / RDC mentioned in B.1 - B.4, request
photocopies thereof from taxpayer
ANNEX E
ESTATE TAX
I. General
2) NOTICE OF DEATH duly received by the BIR, if the gross taxable estate exceeds
P20,000 for deaths occurring on or after Jan. 1, 1998; or if the gross taxable estate exceeds
P3,000 for deaths occurring prior to Jan. 1, 1998
6) A certified copy of the schedule of partition of the estate and the order of the court
approving the same, if applicable
7) Statement of the names of the executor, administrator and/or heirs, with their respective
addresses, who may be made liable for unpaid assessment
8) Income Tax Returns with all the needed attachments, and duly certified Financial
Statements covering transactions in the year of death and one (1) year prior to the date of death
10) Proof that the transfer of property is from a fiduciary heir or legatee to the
fideicommissary, if applicable
11) Proof that the transfer of property is from a first heir, legatee or donee to a beneficiary
designated by the first heir's predecessor, if applicable
12) Proof that the transfer of property is to a social welfare, cultural and charitable
institutions, no part of the net income of which inures to the benefit of any individual and that
not more than 30% of the transferred property is used by such institution for administration
purposes, if applicable
a) current year/period
b) previous year/period
14) Requirements in the investigation of other internal revenue taxes, if they are covered by
the tax audit
2) Certified true copy of the latest Tax Declaration at the time of death;
2) Certificate of registration of vehicles and other proofs showing the correct value of the
same,
For unlisted stocks - latest Financial Statements of issuing corporation with computation of book
value per share
a) Certified true copy of the duly notarized promissory note or contract of loan signed by
the decedent and the surviving spouse;
e) Certification Under Oath as to the balance of the decedent's account, signed by the
President, Vice-President or other responsible official of the corporation, or the individual
creditor
g) Where settlement is made thru the Court, pertinent documents filed with the court
evidencing "claims against the estate", or the court order approving the said claims, if already
issued;
h) Statement/accounting of disposition of the proceeds of the loan, for loans incurred within
3 years prior to the death of the decedent
a) On property previously taxed or vanishing deductions - a copy of the duly bank validated
estate/donor's tax return and proof of payment of the tax on previous transmission/transfer
11) Certified photocopy of the zonal value of properties located outside of the investigating
region
12) Working papers reflecting items of gross estate and deductions duly signed by Tax
Auditors/Revenue Officers
13) Working papers showing computation of estate tax due duly signed by Tax
Auditors/Revenue Officers
16) Reporting requirements for all the other internal revenue taxes, if they are covered by the
tax audit
Note:
In case of non-availability of documents from RDO / RDC mentioned in B.2 - B.4, request
photocopies thereof from taxpayer
1. if applicable
2. Proofs of all the claimed deductions must be presented to the Revenue Officer during the
original investigation and that only photocopies must be attached to the docket.
ANNEX F
DONOR'S TAX
I. General
3) Proof that the donee is a qualified relative of the donor, if the donation is being taxed
using the schedular rates. (e.g. BIRTH CERTIFICATE)
7) Sworn statement that no other donations were made within the same calendar year, if
applicable;
2) Certified true copy/ies of the latest Tax Declaration (front and back pages)
b) For unlisted stocks - latest audited Financial Statements of the issuing corporation with
computation of the book value per share
5) Duly notarized Deed of Extra-judicial Settlement of the Estate with waiver of rights, if
the waiver is subject to donor's tax
6) Working papers showing the computation of gross donation and deductions claimed,
details of previous donations made within the same calendar year and computation of deficiency
tax due, if any, duly signed by Tax Auditors/Revenue Officers
11) Post Reporting Notice/Notice for an Informal Conference with a Summary of Findings
(for non-agreed assessment)
12) Report of Ocular Inspection, if applicable
Note:
In case of non-availability of documents from RDO / RDC mentioned in B.2 - B.5, request
photocopies thereof from taxpayer
ANNEX G
3) Certified true copy of the Certificate of Title of the real property (front and back pages )
4) Certified true copy of the latest Tax Declaration (front and back pages)
7) Seller's latest Certificate of Registration with HLURB or HUDCC and the latest
LICENSE TO SELL, if applicable
8) Seller's latest Certificate of Accreditation issued by the appropriate Real Estate Builders
Association, if applicable
12) Certificate of Non-productivity of ricefield and other agricultural lands issued by the
Barangay Captain, if applicable
6) Working Papers showing computation of deficiency tax due duly signed by the Revenue
Officer
Note:
In case of non-availability of document from RDO / RDC mentioned in B.1, request photocopy
thereof from taxpayer
ANNEX H
CAPITAL GAINS TAX RETURN/DOCUMENTARY STAMP TAX
(For transactions involving onerous transfer of shares of stock not traded through the LOCAL
STOCK EXCHANGE)
6) Xerox copy of the latest Financial Statements of the issuing corporation with computation
of the book value per share
2) Working papers showing the composition of gross sales, acquisition cost/book value of
shares, selling expenses, realized gain and computation of deficiency tax due, if any, duly signed
by the Tax Auditor/Revenue Officer
Note:
In case of non-availability of document from RDO / RDC mentioned in B.1, request photocopy
thereof from taxpayer
ANNEX I
WITHHOLDING TAX REMITTANCE RETURN
(For transactions involving onerous transfer of motor vehicle
classified as ordinary asset)
4. Working paper showing computation of the tax due duly signed by the Tax
Auditor/Revenue Officer
Note:
In case of non-availability of document from RDO / RDC mentioned in B.1, request photocopy
thereof from taxpayer
Copyright 2 0 0 4 ACCESSLAW, Inc.