we ITUTIONAL LAW I! ALY. 2019-2020 1 Manresa Acad je freedom DECS V. SAN DIEGO, G.R. 89572 (1989) GARCIA VS. FACULTY OF ADMISSION, 68 SCRA 277 (1975) DLSU VS. CA 541 SCRA 22 (2007) CUDIA VS, PMA G.R. 211362 2015) SON VS.UST, GR. No, 211273 2018) 1. THE PHILIPPINE CONSTITUTION Political Law Defined IMACARIOLA VS. ASUNCION 114 SCRA 77 (1982) Constitutional Law Defined ‘GENUINO V, DE LIMA, APRIL 17, 2018 ion: definition, nature, and concepts ‘Constitution defined ‘Typeskinds of Constitution CHAVEZ VS. JBC 696 SCRA 496 (2013) Presumption of Constituionality PEREZ VS. PEOPLE 544 SCRA 532 (2008) . Con ‘Adoption and Effectvity of the Present Constitution “Article V of the Provisional Constitution Sov. 27, Art. XVIII of the 1987 Constitution Proclamation No. $8 Feb, 11, 1987 DE LEON VS. ESGUERRA I Compare with Effecivity of Statutes TANADA VS. TUVERA 136 SCRA 27 (1985) TANADA VS. TUVERA 146 SCRA 446 (1986) EO. 200 June 18, 1987 Amending Art. 2 of the Civil Code SCRA 602 (1987) Government Sovereignty C. Amendments and revisions i, Proposal Ant, XVIL, sees. 1-2 GONZALES VS. COMELEC, 1. By Congress ‘Art, XVIL, see, |, 1935 Comst., Art. XV GONZALES VS. COMELEC, SUPRA 2. By Constitutional Convention ‘Ant, XVI, se 21 SCRA 774 (1967) O19 Political and International Law Bar Exam syllabus and the updated ‘uty. Vincent Paul L.. Montejo Page 101303. By the people through initiatives Ant XVIL, sec. 2 Rep. Act No, 6735, SECS. 5 4b) SANTIAGO VS, COMELEC 270 SCRA 106 (1997) TAMBINO, ET AL. VS. COMELEC, ET AL., G.R- NO. 174153 (2005) MARMETO V. COMELEC, GR. No. ii Ratification 1 Incase amendments proposed by Congress of Convention "Ant XVIL, ee. 4, pa 1 2 Inease of amendments proposed through initiative ‘Art XVI, sec. 4, pat. 2 4. Plebiscite tobe called by Congress and supervised by COMELEC, but the initiative on Constitution will be called by COMELEC “THEORIES REGARDING THE POSITION OF A CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION IN OUR SYSTEM OF GOVERNMENT. TOLENTINO VS. COMELEC, 41 SCRA 701 (1971) JUDICIAL REVIEW OF THE AMENDING PROCESS (GONZALES VS. COMELEC, 21 SCRA 774 (1967) TOLENTINO VS, COMELEC, 41 SCRA 702 (1967) JAVELLANA VS. EXECUTIVE SECRETARY, 50 SCRA 30 (1972) ‘Ant. VII, see. 1, par | D, Selfexccuting and non-self-exeeuting provisions MANILA PRINCE HOTEL VS. GSIS 267 SCRA 408 (1997) PAMATONG VS. COMELEC 427 SCRA 96 (2004) COUNCIL OF TEACHERS V, SECRETARY OF EDUCATION, G.R, 2167802018) 1, GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS: Conditions for the Exercise of Fuical Review FUNA VS. AGRA 691 SCRA 196 2013) BELGICA VS. OCHOA 710 SCRA 1 2013) FUNA VS. MANILA ECON OFFICE 715 SCRA 247 2018) DISINI VS, SO! 716 SCRA 237 (2014) (Separate Opinion of J. S IMBONG VS. OCHOA 721 SCRA 146 2014) IARAUILLO VS. AQUINO IIL 728 SCRA 1 (2014) ‘OSMENA VS. PSALM 771 SCRA $96 2015) OSMENA VS. ABAYA 781 SCRA 1 (2016) LAUDE VS. GINEZ-JABALDE 775 SCRA 408 INTERNATIONAL SERVICE VS. GREENPEACE (2015 and 2016) RESIDENT MARINE MAMMALS VS. REYES, GR, No. 180771 (2015) SAGUISAG VS. OCHOA 779 SCRA 241 (2016) OCAMPO V. ENRIQUEZ G.R, No, 225973 (2016) PHILCONSA V. PHILIPPINE GOVERNMENT, G.R. No, 218406 (2016) PADILLA V. CONGRESS, G.R.No. 231671 (2017) ‘SAMAHAN (SPARK) V. QUEZON CITY. AUGUST 8, 2017 ‘OCAMPO VS, ENRIQUEZ (MR) AUGUST, 2 EAIGITS OF RIZAL VS. DMCLHOMES, INC. G.8, NO. 213948 2017) IFURUNG V. CARPIO MORALES 2018) PROVINCIAL BUS OPERATORS V, DOLE AND LTERB (2018) PRIVATE HOSPITALS ASSOCIATION V. MEDIALDEA 2018) jereno) : 17 Page 2 of 30ctions of Judicial Review: Checkin JAVIER VS, COMELEC 144 SCRA 194 (1986) |ABS-CBN VS. COMELEC 323 SCRA SI! (2000) CENTRAL BANK VS. BSP 446 SCRA 229 (2004) All Courts Can Exercise Judicial Review YNOT VS, IAC [48 SCRA 659 (1987) BROKENSHIRE VS, MINISTER 182 SCRA 5 (1990) ONGSUCO VS. MALONES 604 SCRA 499 (2009) Political Question vs. Justiciable Question ‘OPOSA VS. FACTORAN 224 SCRA 792 (1993) VELARDE VS. SIS 428 SCRA 283 2008) COMELEC VS. CRUZ. 605 SCRA 167 (2009) VINUYA VS. ROMULO 619 SCRA $33 (2010) VINUYA VS, ROMULO 732 SCRA 595 (2014) SAGUISAG VS, OCHOA 779 SCRA 241 (2016) DIOCESE OF BACOLOD V. COMELEC. GR No. 208 28 (2015) Efets of Declaration of Uneonstitutionality Article 7, New Civil Code ofthe Philippines ‘SERRANO DE AGBAYANI VS, PNB 38 SCRA 429 (1971) ‘ALDOVINO VS. ALLNAN III 230 SCRA 825 (1994), Operative Fact Doctrine HACIENDA LUISITA VS. PARC 660 SCRA 525 (2011) COCOFED VS. REPUBLIC 663 SCRA 514 (2012) CIR VS. SAN ROQUE 707 SCRA 66 013) BELGICA VS. OCHOA 710 SCRA 1 Q013) ARAULLO VS. AQUINO [11728 SCRA 1 (2014) CIR VS. PUREGOLD 760 SCRA 96 (2015) FILM DEVELOPMENT VS. COLON HERITAGE, G.8. No MANDANAS V, OCHOA, GR. No. 199802 2018) 3754 (2015) A. National territory ‘State defined ‘COLLECTOR VS. CAMPOS RUEDA 42 SCRA 23 (1971) Elements ofa State 1, Territory Aricle | NICOLAS VS. ROMULO 578 SCRA 438 (2008) SAGUISAG VS. OCHOA 779 SCRA 241 (2016) REPUBLIC VS, PROVINCIAL GOV'T, G.R. NO. 170867 (2018) “The Archipelagie Doctrine ‘Methods of Determining Baselines RA, 3046 - June 17, 1961 RA. 5446 - Sept. 8, 1968 RA. 9522 March 10, 2009 MAGALLONA V. ERMITA, G.R. No. 18716; August 16, 2011 has Sovereiunty or Jurisdiction Other Territories Over whieh the Philippin PID. No. 1596 June 1, 1978 (Kalayaan Islands) sy 3010sl “fe the Insular Shelves and Other catborough Shoal” The Terttorial Sea, the Sea Bed, the Subsoi Submarine Areas ‘Two Hundred-Mile Exclusive Beonomie Zone P.D. 1599 June 11, 1978 U.N. Convention on the Law ofthe Sea ~ April 30, 1982 2 People Different meaning of the word/“People” under the Constitution 4 Inhabitants - Secs. 15 & 16, Art I; See.2, Art. IL ‘QUA CHEE GAN VS, DEPORTATION BOARD 9 SCRA 27 (1963) See. 1, Art. XH bs. Citizens» Preamble «Electors - Sec. 2, Att. Vi; See. 4, Art cs. 1&4, Art; Sec. 7, Art IL I; Soe. 25, Art. XVI cienly oetrine of auto-limitation PEOPLE V. GOZO $3 SCRA 476 (1973) TANADA V. ANGARA, 338 PHIL, 546, $93 (1997) Doctrine of incorporation “Treaties and agreemer TANADA V. ANGARA 272 SCRA 18 (1997) BAYAN V, ZAMORA G.R. 138570 (2000) BAYAN V. ROMULO, G.R. 159618 2011) DEUTSCHE BANK V. CIR, G.R. 188550 (2013) Intemational law in municipal law LIM V. EXECUTIVE SECRETARY, GR. 151445 (2002) PHILIP MORRIS V, FORTUNE TOBACCO, GR. 158589 (2006) Soft law PHARMACEUTICAL V. DOH, G.R. 173034 2007) OCAMPO. V. ENRIQUEZ G,R, No, 225973 2016 J. Sereno Dissent State Immunity ‘Sec. 3, Art, XVI, 1987 Constitution UBLIC VS. VILLASOR 54 SCRA 83 (1973) ‘When i a suit against the State? PROFESSIONAL VIDEO VS. TESDA 591 SCRA 83 (2009) HEIRS OF MATEO PIDACAN VS. ATO 629 SCRA 451 (2010) ‘ATO VS. RAMOS 644 SCRA 36 (2011) CHINA NATIONAL VS. SANTAMARIA 665 SCRA 189 2012), DOH VS, PHIL PHARMA 691 SCRA 421 (2013) [ARIGO VS. SWIFT 735 SCRA 102 (2014) NHA VS. ROXAS 773 SCRA 358 (2015) SPOUSES ABECINA, G.R, No, 206884 2016) pore CITY OF BACOLOD V. PHUTURE VISIONS, G.R. No. 190289 2018 Consent to be Sued ‘How consent is given? VETERANS MANPOWER VS. CA 214 SCRA 286 (1992) DA VS. NLRC 227 SCRA 693 (1993) REPUBLIC V. ROQUE, G.R. No. 203610 (2016) Page 40630 i.cathorough Shoal The Territorial Sea, the Sea Bed, the Subsoil, the Insular Shelves and Other Submarine Areas Two Hundred-Mile Exclusive Feonomie Zone P.D. 1599 - June 11, 1978 U.N. Convention on the Law ofthe Sea ~ April 30, 1982 2. People Different meaning of the word “People” undes the Constitution 4. Inhabitants - Secs. 15 & 16, Art I; Sec. 2, Art It ‘QUA CHEE GAN VS. DEPORTATION BOARD 9 SCRA 27 (1963) Soc. 1, Art XH b. Citizens - Preamble: Secs. 1 & 4, Art. Electors - Sec. 2, Art. VI; See. 4, Art I; See. 7, Art IIL Il; See. 25, Art. XVII 3. Sovereignty Doetrine of auto-imitation PEOPLE V. GOZO $3 SCRA 476 (1973) ‘TANADA V. ANGARA, 338 PHIL. $46, $93 (1997) Doctrine of incorporation “Treaties and agreements TANADA V. ANGARA 272 SCRA 18 (1997) BAYAN V. ZAMORA G.R. 138570 (2000) BAYAN V. ROMULO, GR. 159618 2011) DEUTSCHE BANK V. CIR, G.R. 188550 (2013) ternational law in municipal aw LIM V. EXECUTIVE SECRETARY, GR. 151445 (2002) PHILIP MORRIS V. FORTUNE TOBACCO, G.R. 158589 (2006) Soft law PHARMACEUTICAL V, DOH, G.R, 173034 (2007) OCAMPO V, ENRIQUEZ G.R. No, 225973 2016 (J. Sereno Dissent State Immunity ‘See, 3, Art, XVI, 1987 Constitution REPUBLIC VS. VILLASOR 54 SCRA 83 (1973) When isa suit inst the State? PROFESSIONAL VIDEO VS. TESDA 591 SCRA 83 (2009) HEIRS OF MATEO PIDACAN VS. ATO 629 SCRA 451 (2010) ATO VS. RAMOS 644 SCRA 36 2011) CHINA NATIONAL VS. SANTAMARIA 665 SCRA 189 (2012) DOH VS. PHIL PHARMA 691 SCRA 421 (2013) [ARIGO VS. SWIFT 735 SCRA 102 (2014) NHA VS. ROXAS 773 SCRA 358 (2015) DOTC V, SPOUSES ABECINA, GR. No, 206484 2016) ‘CITY OF BACOLOD V. PHUTURE VISIONS, GR. No, 190289 (2018) Consent to be Sued How consent is given? ‘VETERANS MANPOWER VS. CA 214 SCRA 286 (1992) DA VS. NLRC 227 SCRA 693 (1993) REPUBLIC V. ROQUE, GR. No, 203610 2016) Page dof 30MALONESIO V. JIZMUNDO. G.R, No, 199235 AMCOW V..GC No. 207132 2016 1. Express Consent ‘2. Money Claims Arising From Contract CA. 3083, CA. 327 & PD. 1445 SAYSON VS, SINGSON 54 SCRA 2! (1973) 1. Incorporation of Govt. Owned and/or Controlled Corporations (GOC NHA VS, 389 (2003) 9) IRS OF GUIVELONDO 404 SCRA 2. Implied Conse ‘4, Government Enters Into Business Contracts PTA VS. PGDEL 668 SCRA 406 bi, Inequitale to Claim Immunity EPG CONSTRUCTION VS. VIGILAR 354 SCRA 566 (2001), REPUBLIC VS, UNIMEX 518 SCRA 19 (2007) «. Government initiates a complaint, open to counterelaim TROILAN VS. PAN ORIENTAL 95 PHIL 905 (1950) REPUBLIC VS 119.2006) SANDIGANBAYAN 484 SCRA 3, Scope of Consent 1. Under Act No. 3083 ‘COMMISSIONER VS. SAN DIEGO 31 SCRA 616 (1970) b, Under a Charter PNB VS. CIR SI SCRA 314 (1978) «. Execution DEPT. OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS VS. NLRC 262 SCRA 39 (1996) REPUBLIC VS. HIDALGO 477 SCRA 32 (2005) 4, Suability vs. Liability ‘Quasi-Delit committed by Special Age Art. 2180, New Civil Code MERRIT VS, GOVT 34 PHIL 311 (1916) MUNICIPALITY. VS, JUDGE 195 SCRA 692 1991) MUNICIPALITY OF HAGONOY VS. DUMDUM. GIGSCRA 1 (2010) UP V. DIZON, G.R. No. 171182 (2012) 4, Government "Government" in General - Defined b.°Government of the Philippines” - Defined ‘Sec. 2(1), Administrative Code of 1987 BACANI V, NACOCO 100 PHIL. 468 (1956) ACCEA V CUGCO 30 SCRA 649 (1969) PVTA V. CIR 65 SCRA 416 (1975) Government-owned or controlled corporations (GOCCS) WEP V, REYES 483 SCRA 526 (2006) RAMISCAL V, SANDIGANBAY AN 499 SCRA 375(2006) Page Sof 0mm ALZAGA V. SA remalities MIAA V CA 495 SCRA 591 (2006) BOY SCOUTS V. COA 651 SCRA 146 (2011) FUNA V. MECO AND COA GR. 193462, FEBRUARY 4, 2014 DIGANBAYAN S08 SCRA 848 (2006) PHIL. SOC TY V.COA 534 SCRA 112 (2007) State universities 'SERANA V. SANDIGANBAYAN 542.SCRA 224 (2008) «©. De jure vs, de facto government CO KIM CHAN V. TAN KEH 75 PHIL, 113 (1945) LETTER OF ASSOCIATE JUSTICE PUNO 210 SCRA 588 (1992) REPUBLIC V, SANDIGANBAYAN G.R, 104768, JULY 21. Jeneral principles and state policies ARTICLE Il KILOSBAYAN V. MORATO 246 SCRA 520 (1995); 250 SCRA 130 (1995) TONDO MEDICAL V. CA 527 SCRA 746 (2087) BCDA V. COA S80 SCRA 295 (2009) . Separation of powers ‘ANGARA VS, ELECTORAL COMMISSION 63 PHIL 139 (1936) RE: COA OPINION 678 SCRA 1 (2012), GARCIA VS. DRILON 699 SCRA 352 (2013) CORPUZ V. PEOPLE 724 SCRA I (2014) MAMISCAL VS. ABDULLAH 761 SCRA 39 (2015) CARDIO MORALES VS CA 774 SCRA 431 (2015) ESTIPONA V. LOBRIGO, G.R, No. 226679 (2017) D. Checks and balances ‘SAGUISAG VS, OCHOA 779. PADILLA V. CONGRESS, GR. No. SCRA 241 2016) 231671 Q017 Cases involving impeachable officials REPUBLIC VS. SERENO, G.R. No. 237428 (2018) REPUBLIC VS, SERENO, G.R. No, 237428, une 19,2018 (MR Delegation of powers ‘General rule: Non-Del fon of Powers applicable in all branches of Goverament Exceptions ‘Delegation to local government and administrative bodies ‘Grant of Quasi-legislative power CaMV. PROVINCIAL BOARD OF MINDORO, 39 PHIL. 660 (1918-19) ANTIPOLO REALTY CORP. VS. NHA, 153 SCRA 399 PUTC VS, ANGELES, GR. NO. 108461 (1996) VV INTERPORT, 567 SCRA 354 (2008) Instances allowed by the Constitution (Article VI. Requisites ofa valid delegation AGUSTIN V. EDU, 88 SCRA 1 (1979) AoE TELEPHON WORKERS V. MINISTER, 108 SCRA 757 (1981) GUINGONA V. CARAGUE, 196 SCRA 221 (1991) Page 6 0f 01M CITIZENSHIP. A.Who are Filipino citizens? Sec. 1, Art. IV, 1987 Constitution TECSON VS, COMELEC 424 SCRA 277 (2004) Go, SR. VS, RAMOS 598 SCRA 260 (2009) GONZALES VS. PENNISI 614 SCRA 292 VILANDO VS. HRET 656 SCRA 17 (2011) GO VS. BID 759 SCRA 578 (2015) REPUBLIC VS, KARBASI 764 SCRA 352 2015) AGUSTIN VS. COMELEC 774 SCRA 353 (2015) POE VS. COMELEC 786 SCRA 1 2016) TAN, CRISOLOGO G.R. No, 193993 (2017) 1010) 1. Jus sanguins 2. us so [Natural-Born Citizens Sec. 2, Art IV, 1987 Constttion POE-LLANZAMARES V. COMELEC (2016) GONZALES V. HARP, G.R. No. 188829 (2016) DAVID V. SENATE ELECTORAL TRIBUNAL, GR No, 22 38 (2016) Election of Philippine Citizenship ‘COMM. ACT NO. 625 -JUNE 7, 1941 IN RE: CHING 316 SCRA 1 (1999) REPUBLIC VS. LIM-419 SCRA 123 (2004) MA VS, FERNANDEZ 625 SCRA 566 (2010) VILANDO VS. ITRET 656 SCRA 17 2011) REPUBLIC VS. SAGUN 666 SCRA 321 (2012) VASQUEZ V CUECO KHO, A.C. No, 9492 016) Vaturalization and denaturalization Naturalized Citizens RA, 9139 June 8, 2001 COMM. ACT NO. 473 -JUNE 17, 1939 GO VS. REPUBLIC 729 SCRA 138 (2014) REPUBLIC VS. BATUIGAS 706 SCRA 746 2013) HUNG GR. No, 212785 (2018) 1. Who are qualified tobe Naturalized Note Effect of R.A. 6809 - Age of Majority Note Effect on Language Requirement [Ant XIV, Sec. 6, 1987 Constitution Residency Requirement Reduced to $ years 2. Declaration of Intention 3. Procedure 4, When Decision is Excoutory - Sec, 15, R.A. 530, REPUBLIC VS. LI CHING CHUNG 694 SCRA 249 (2013) Page T06905, Denatualization (Denaturatization is the process by which the U.S. goverament revokes or cancels someones U.S. citizenship because the person hhas done something that undermines his or her very right to that status.) CO VS. CIVIL REGISTER 423 SCRA 420 (2004) REPUBLIC VS. ONG 673 SCRA 485 (2012) R.A. 9139 June 8, 2001 D. Loss and re-aequisition of Philippine citizenship Sec.3, Article V ‘Commonwealth Aet No, 63 R.A. 9225 - August 29, 2003 AASIS VS. DATUMANONG 323 SCRA 108 (2007) LOPEZ VS. COMELEC 559 SCRA 698 (2008), JACOT VS. DAL $72 SCRA 295 (2048), DE GUZMAN VS. COMELEC 590 SCRA 149 (09) SOBEJANA-CONDON VS, COMELEC 678 SCRA 267 (2012) MAQUILING VS. COMELEC 696 SCRA 420 MAQUILING VS. COMELEC 700 SCRA 367 (2013) DANO V COMELEC, GR. No, 210200 (2016) TANV.C 2GO G.R. No, 193993 2017) CARDINO V. COMELEC GR, No, 216637 (2017) 4. Loss of Citizenship REPUBLIC VS. DELA ROSA 252 SCRA 785 (1994) GUY VS. IGNACIO 622 SCRA 678 2010) 2, Express Renunciation or Expatriation YU VS. DEFENSOR-SANTIAGO 169 SCRA 364 (1989) AZNAR VS. COMELEC 185 SCRA 703 (1990) VILANDO VS, HRET 686 SCRA 17 Q011) SOBEJANA-CONDON VS, COMELEC 678 SCRA 267 (2012) MAQUILING VS, COMELEC 696 SCRA 420 MAQUILING VS, COMELEC 700 SCRA 367 (2013) b, Reacquisition or Repatriation RA. 8171 October 23, 1995 REPUBLIC VS. DELA ROSA 232 SCRA 785 (1994) VALLES VS. COMELEC 337 SCRA $43 (2000) BENGZON III VS. HRET 357 SCRA 545 (2001) ANGAT VS, REPUBLIC 314 SCRA 438 (1999) ALTERAJOS VS. COMELEC 441 SCRA 655 (2004) TABASA VS. CA 500 SCRA 9 (2006) ARNADO VS. COMELEC 767 SCRA 168 (2015) CABALLERO VS. COMELEC 771 SCRA 213 (2015) E, Dual citizenship and dual allegiance See. , Art IV, 1987 Constitution See. 40 (a), Local Govt. Code of 1991 MERCADO VS, MANZANO 307 SCRA 630 (1999) CHUA V, COMELEC GR. No, 2166077 2016) CARDINO V. COMELEC G.R. No, 216637 2017)F.Foundlings POE VS. COMELEC 786 SCRA 1 2016) DAVID V, SENA’ rORAL TRIBUNAL, G.R. Ni 21538 2016) 6. Naturat-born citizens and p ‘Who must be Natoral-Born 1. President - Ar. Vil, See? 2 Viee President - Ari Vil Sec. 3 3. Members of Congres - Ar, Vi, Sees. 3 & 6 4 Justices ofthe Supreme Court and Lower Collegiate Courts Art Vill, See. 7 KILOSBAYAN VS. ERMITA 526 SCRA 353 (2007) 5. Ombudsman and Deputies - Art. XI. See. 8 IEURUNG ¥. CARPIO-MORALES, G 6. Constitutional Commission Members Art IX-B, See. 1 (1) Ant IX-C, See. (1) An IX-D, See. 1) 7. Central Monetary Authority Members - Art. XI, Sov. 20 8. Commission on Human Rights Members - At, XII, Sec. 17 (2) office 232131.@018) IV. LEGIS LATIVE DEPARTMENT A. Who may exercise legislative poner 1. Congress 2. Regional/Local legislative power 3. People’s ani ative on statutes ive and referendum R.A. No. 6735, Aus 4, 1989 GARCIA VS. COMELEC 237 SCRA 279 (1994) SBMA VS. COMELEC 262 SCRA 492 (1996) SANTIAGO VS. COMELEC 270 SCRA 106 (197) LAMBINO, ET AL. VS. COMELEC, ET AL., G.R. NO. 174153 (2006) MARMETO V. COMELEC, G,R, No, 213953 2017, 4.’The President under a mi al Law rule oF ina revolutionary gove Article VI, Seeton 18 LAGMAN V. MEDIALDEA, G.R. No. 231658 2017) PADILLA V. CONGRESS, G.R, No, 251671 2017) LAGMAN, PIMENTELII GR, No. 235035 2018) LAGMANV. MEDIALDEA, Gi No. 245522 (2019) B. Houses of Congress 1. Senate At. VI, Sees. 2-4 2. House of Representatives At. VI, Sees. 5-6 Ant IX, C, Sees. 68 Att. XVII, Sec. 7 Page 06 30a Regular election ‘Art VI, Sec. 8 b. Special election ‘Art VI, See. 9 Ait. IX, C, See. 11 R-A.No. 6645, Dee. 28, 1987 R.A. No, 7166 ‘TOLENTINO VS. COMELEC 420 SCRA 438 (2004) Fair Bletions Act (R.A. 9006) SABILI VS, COMELEC 670 SCRA 664 (2012) ALDOVINO VS, COMELEC 609 SCRA 636 (2009) TALAGA VS, COMELEC 683 SCRA 602 (2012) QUINTO VS, COMELEC 606 SCRA 258 (2009); 613 SCRA 385 2010) MITRA VS, COMELEC 622 SCRA 749 (2010) ASISTIO VS, AGUIRRE 619 518 (2010) MAQUILING VS, COMELEC 696 SCRA 420 MAQUILING VS, COMELEC 700 SCRA 367 (2013) CABALLERO VS. COMELEC 771 SCRA 213 (2015) CHIONG V, SENATE, G.R. No, 217725 (2016) Synchronized tems of afice ‘Art. XVIIL, Sees. 1-2 ALDOVINO VS, COMELEC 609 SCRA 636 (2009) ‘ABUNDO VS. COMELEC 688 SCRA 149 2013) NAVAL VS, COMELEC 729 SCRA 299 (2014) a. District representatives and questions of apportionment TOBIAS V. ABALOS, 239 SCRA 106 (1994) MARIANO V. COMELEC, 242 SCRA 211 (1995) SEMA VS. COMELEC 558 SCRA 700 (2008) BAGABUYO VS. COMELEC, GR. NO. 176790 (2008) ALDABA VS. COMELEC 611 SCRA 137 (2009); 615 SCRA S64 (2010) NAVARRO VS. ERMITA 612 SCRA 131 (2009); NAVARRO VS. ERMITA, G.R. NO. 180050 2011) AQUINO IIL VS, COMELEC 617 SCRA 623 (2010) NAVAL VS. COMELEC 729 SCRA 299 (2014) Hist system (R.A. No. 7941) March 3, 1995 BANAT VS. COMELEC 586 SCRA 210 2000) ABAYON VS, HRET 612 SCRA 375 2010) [ANG LADLAD YS. COMELEC 618 SCRA'32 2010) LOKIN, JR. VS COMELEC 621 SCRA 285 2010): LOKIN, JR. VS COMELEC 674 SCRA 338 (2012) AMORES VS. HRET 622 SCRA 593 (2010) LAYUG VS, COMELEC 667 SCRA 135 2012) ATONG PAGLAUM, INC. VS. COMELEC; 694 SCRA 477 2013) COCOFED VS. COMELEC 703 SCRA ies [ANAD VS, COMELEC 705 SCRA 340 (2013) ‘ABANG LINGKOD VS. COMELEC 708 SCRA 133 (13) LICO VS, COMELEC, G.R. NO. 205505 2013) GABRIELA V. COMELEC. G.R. NO. 225198 (2017) ($C Resolution and J. Leonen’s Separate Opini eae Be Resales) Poge Wot 30il disqualifications, C. Legislative privileges, inhibitions a. Salaries Art. VI, See. 10 Art. XVI, Sec. 17 PHILCONSA VS, MATHAY 18 SCRA 300 (1966) LIGOT VS, MATHAY 56 SCRA 823 (1974) b. Freedom from arrest ‘Art. VI, See. 11 PEOPLE VS. JALOSIOS 324 SCRA 689 (2000) TRILLANES VS. PIMENTEL 556 SCRA 471 (2008) «. Speech and Debate Clause Art. VI, Sec. 11 OSMENA VS. PENDATUN 109 PHIL 863 (1960) JIMENEZ VS. CABANGBANG 17 SCRA 876 (1966), POBRE VS. DEFENSOR-SANTIAGO, 597 SCRA | (2009) ‘TRILLANES V. CASTILLO-MARIGOMEN, G.R, No, 223451 (2018) «4. Disqualifications (1) Incompatible and Forbidden Offices Article VI, See. 13, LIBAN VS, GORDON 593 SCRA 68 (2009) LIBAN VS. GORDON 639 SCRA 703 (2011) (2) Other prohibitions Art. VI, Sec. 14 PUYAT VS. DE GUZMAN 113 SCRA 31 (1982) GICA VS, OCHOA 710 SCRA 1 (2013) Att. XI, $ee.16 G) Duty to diselose At. XI, Sec 17 At. VI, See 12, See. 20 D. Quorum and voting majorities a, Election of Officers At. VI, See. 16 (I) SANTIAGO VS. GUINGONA 298 SCRA 756 (1998) . Quorum Aaticle VI, See. 16 (2) AVELINO VS. CUENCO 83 PHIL, 17 (1949) «© Rules of proceedings Article VI, Se. 16(3) “Anicle VI See 21 ARROYO VS, DE VENECIA 277 SCRA258 (1997) GARCILLANO VS. HI COMMITTEES 575 SCRA 170 2008 DELA PAZ VS. SENATE COMMITTEE $79 SCRA Solon) BAGUILAT V. ALVAREZ, G.R,No,227757 019) | 0 tof4, Journal and Congressional Records An, VI, See. 16.4) ‘() The Enrolled Bill Theory [ARROYO VS. DE VENECIA 277 SCRA 268 (1997) FARINAS VS. EXECUTIVE 417 SCRA 503 (2003) ABAKADA VS, PURISIMA 562 SCRA 251 (08) ‘COUNCIL V. SECRETARY G.R. NO, 216930 2018) {@) Probative value of the journal UNITED STATES VS. PONS 34 PHIL. 729 (1916) CASCO PHIL. VS, GIMENEZ, 7 SCRA 347 (1963) MORALES V. SUBIDO, 27 SCRA 131 (196) (8) Matters required to be enfered inthe Journal {a Yeas and nays on third and final reading ofa bill Ant VI See. 26 2) (6) Veto message ofthe President Aa. VI, See. 27 (I) {) Yeas and nays on the repassing of {a) Yeas and nays om any question at the request of 1/5 of mcners present (Art. VI See. 16 (41) {) Summary of Proceedings (4) Journal Entry Role v, Enrolled Bill Theory "ASTORGA VS. VILLEGAS 56 SCRA 714 (1974) FIELD VS. CLARK, 36 L. ED. 294 (1891) PHIL, JUDGES ASSN. V. PRADO, 277 SCRA 703 (5) Congressional Record ‘Amt, See. 16 (4), pat. 2 a ill vetoed by the President «Sessions (1) Regular sessions At. VI See. 15 Id, Sec" 16 (9) GUEVARA VS. INOCENTES 16 SCRA 379 (1966) (2) Special sessions Aaticle VI se. 15 ‘Art VIL, Sees. 10-11 ‘Art VIL see. 18 par. 3 (6) Joint sessions (a) Voting separately ‘Art VIL, Seo. 4 (Choosing the President) {a See 11, Par, 4 (Determining the Presiden’ temporary disability) 14, Sce. 9 (Confiming the nomination of Vice-President) [ATC VL See, 23(1) (Declaring a state of war) ‘Art XVII, See. 11) (Amending the Constitution) (0) Vowing oily Tt VI, See. 18 (0 revoke or extend martial law or suspension o privilege of habeas corpus) ee it PADILLA V. CONGRESS, G.R, No, 231671 Q01 EB. Discipline of members Article VI, See. 163) ALEJANDRINO VS. QUEZON 46 PHIL, 83 (1924) OSMENA VS. PENDATUN 1089 PHIL. 863 (1960) (suspension for 1$ months) SANTIAGO VS. SANDIGANBAY AN 356 SCRA 636 (2001) ‘ ANES V, CASTILLO-MARIGOMEN, G.R, No, 223451 (2018) Page 120630. Electoral tribunals and the Commission Appointments |. Nature 2. Powers lectoral tribunals Ant VI, Sees. 17 and 19 BARBERS VS, COMELEC 460 SCRA 569 (2009) FERNANDEZ VS. HRET 608 SCRA 733 (2009) ABAYON VS. HRET 612 SCRA 375 (2009) LAYUG VS, COMELEC 667 SCRA 135 (2012) JALOSIOS VS, COMELEC 674 SCRA $30 (2012) ‘ATONG PAGLAUM VS. COMELEC 694 SCRA 477 (13) REYES VS, COMELEC 699 SCRA 522 (2013); 708 SCRA 197 (2013) TANADA VS. COMELEC 708 SCRA 188 (2013) LICO VS. COMELEC 771 SCRA 596 (2015) VELASCO VS. BELMONTE 780 SCRA 81 (2016) TY-DELGADO VS. HRET 782 SCRA 117 2016) ‘TANADA VS. HRET 785 SCRA 314 (2016) RIVERA VS, COMELEC 790 SCRA 443 (2016) [ABAYON VS. HRET 791 SCRA 242 (2016) Composition TANADA VS, CUENCO, 103 PHIL. 1051(1957) ABBAS VS. SET, 166 SCRA 6SI (1988) PIMENTEL VS. HRET 393 SCRA 231 (2002) Nature of Function ANGARA VS, ELECTORAL COMMISSION 63 PHIL. 139 (1946) REQUEST OF JUSTICES MELENCIO HERRERA, CRUZ AND FELICIANO TO BE RELIEVED AS MEMBERS OF THE HRET, RESOLUTION DATED MARCH 19, 1991 Independence ofthe Electoral Tribunals BONDOC VS. PINEDA, 201 SCRA 792 (1991) Powers LIBANAN VS, HRET 283 SCRA 520 (1997) GARCIA VS. HRET 312 SCRA 353 (1999) Judicial Review of decisions of Electoral Tribunals MARTINEZ VS, HRET 610 SCRA 733 (2010) SANDOVAL VS. HIRET 614 SCRA 798 (2010) VILANDO VS, HRET 656 SCRA 17 (2011) 'b. Commission on Appointments ‘Ant, VI, Sevs. 18 and 19 DAZA V. SINGSON, 180 SCRA 496 (1989) COSETENG V, MITRA, 187 SCRA 377 (1990) GUINGONA VS, GONZALES 214 SCRA 789 (1991); 219 SCRA 326 (1993) PIMENTEL VS. HRET 393 SCRA 251 (2002) ‘ Page 18030G Powers of C 1. Legislative General plenary powers Att. VI, Sec. 1 CITY OF DAVAO VS, RTC 467 SCRA 280 (2005) a. Legislative inquiries and the oversight functions A. Question hour Article VI, See. 22 SENATE VS. ERMITA 488 SCRA 1 (2006) B. Legislative invest Ant VI, See. 21 SENATE BLUE RIBBON VS. MAJADUCON 407 SCRA 356 (2004) NATE VS. ERMITA. 488 SCRA 1 (2006) GUDANI VS. SENGA 498 SCRA 671 (2006) IN RE: SABIO 504 SCRA 704 (2006) STANDARD CHARTERED VS. SENATE 541 SCRA 456 (2008) NERI VS, SENATE COMMITTEE 549 SCRA 77 (2008), NERI VS. SENATE COMMITTEE 564 SCRA 52 (2008) GARCILLANO VS. HR COMMITTEES 575 SCRA 170 (2008) PHILCOMSAT VS. SENATE 673 SCRA 611 (2012) REPUBLIC V. BOLANTE, G.R. No, 186717 (2017) BALAG V, SENATE, G.RNO. 234608 (2018) MARCOS V. FARINAS, G.R, No, 232395 (2018) gations », Bicameral conference e toe ‘© power press substantive limitations Art Ill Bill of Rights) Art VI, Sees. 25 and 28 Att. XIV, Ses, 43) Art. Vi, Seo. 29 NAZARETH VS, VILLAR 689 SCRA 385 (2013) BELGICA VS, OCHOA 710 SCRA 1 2013 ARAULLO VS, AQUINO IIL 728 ScRA 1 (2014) ARAULLOVS, AQUINO 749 SCRA 283 (2015) CONFEDERATION OF COCONUT V-AQUING pa ACRUZV. OCHOA. @o1s)—OVINO.C2o17) Article VI, See. 30, Article VI, See, 31 (b) Implied substantive limitations Doctrine of Non-Delegation of Pi of Government FLORES VS. MONTEMAYoR ¢: ‘owers applicable in all branches 29 SCRA 178 (2019) Page 14 of 301. Prohibition against delegation of legislative power REVIEW CENTER VS. ERMITA 583 SCRA 428 (2009) COCOFED VS. REPUBLIC 663 SCRA 514 (2012) VIVAS VS. MONETARY BOARD 703 SCRA 290 (2013) BELGICA VS. OCHOA 710 SCRA 1 (2013) DISINI VS, SOS 716 SCRA 237 ‘TUA VS. MANGROBANG 714 SCRA 428 FERRER VS. BAUTISTA 760 SCRA 652 (2015), ‘CRUZ VS. PANDACAN HIKERS 778 SCRA 385 (2016) QC-PTCA VS. DEP ED 784 SCRA 505 (2016) ‘SORIANO V. SECRETARY GR. No, 184450 (2017) GENUINO V. DE LIMA G.R. No, 197930 (2018) Undue delegation PEOPLE VS. VERA 65 PHIL. 56 (1937-1938) US VS. BARRIAS, 11 PHIL. 327 (1908) US VS. PANLILIO 28 PHIL. 608 (1914) PEOPLE VS. MACEREN, 79 SCRA 450 (1977) PEOPLE VS. DACUYCUY 173 SCRA 90 (1989) ‘YNOT VS. IAC, 158 SCRA 659 (1987) ABAKADA VS. PURISIMA 562 SCRA 251 (08) Exceptions to Non-Delegation Doctrine Delegation to the President ‘Art. VI, Soc. 25(2) & Sec. 28 (2) Delegation to the people Art VIL, sec. 32 Delegation to local governments and administrative bodies ‘RUBI V, PROVINCIAL BOARD (1918-19) ANTIPOLO REALTY VS. NHA, 153 SCRA 399 PUTC VS. ANGELES, G.R. NO. 108461 (1996) ATITIW V. ZAMORA, 471 SCRA 329 (2005) SEC V. INTERPORT, 367 SCRA 354 (2008) UMALI VS. COMELEC 723 SCRA 170 (2014) MOSQUEDA V, PILIPINO BANANA (2016) ‘MOSQUEDA V. PILIPINO BANANA 2016) EYASCO V. MONTANEZ, GR. 199172 2018) 2, Prohibition against passage of irrepealable laws pray SIDA VS: SENATE 659 SCRA 2702011) and 667 SCRA 270, (2012) (2) Procedural limitation Article VI, Sees. 26-27 TOLENTINO VS. SECRETARY 235 SCRA 630 (1994) TOLENTINO VS. SECRETARY 249 SCRA 628 (1995) ALVAREZ VS. GUINGONA, IR. 252 SCRA 695 (1996) ARROYO VS DE VENECIA 291 SCRA 433 (1998) ABAKADA VS. EXECUTIVE 469 SCRA 1 (2005) ABAKADA VS. PURISIMA $62 SCRA 251 (2008) As to titles of bills ‘Ast. VI, sec. 26(1) PHIL. JUDGES VS. PRADO 227 SCRA 703 (1993) DE GUZMAN VS. COMELEC 336 SCRA 188 (2000) BANAT VS. COMELEC 595 SCRA 477 (2000) Page 15 0f30Which should contol, the tile othe text ofa statute? CRUZ VS. PARAS, 123 SCRA 569 (1953) TATAD VS, SECRETARY 281 SCRA 330 (1997); 282 SCRA 337 (1997) FARINAS VS. EXECUTIVE 417 SCRA 503 (2003) REMMAN ENT. VS. PRBRE 715 SCRA 293 (2014) IMBONG VS, OCHOA 721 SCRA 146 (2014) {. Limitations on revenue, appropri Origin of Bills ABAKADA VS. EXECUTIVE 469 SCRA I (2005) 4 Appropriation laws ‘Ant. VIL, see, 2 Art VI, secs, 24.25 BRILLANTES VS, COMELEC 432 SCRA 269 (2004) ATITIW VS. ZAMORA 471 SCRA 329 (2005) BELGICA VS. OCHOA 710 SCRA 1 (2013) ARAULLO YS. AQUINO III 728 SCRA 1 2014) ARAULLO VS. AQUINO Ill 749 SCRA 283 (2015) b. Tax laws Ant VI, se, 28 Ar, XIV, see. 43) (4) YMCA vs. CA 298 SCRA 83 (1998) CHAVEZ VS. PCGG 299 SCRA 744 (1998) LUNG CENTER VS. QUEZON CITY 433 SCRA 119 (2004) EXECUTIVE VS, SOUTHWING 482 SCRA 673 (2005) MANDANAS V. OCHOA, G.R, No, 199802 2018) fi, Presidential veto and Congressional override ‘The Presidents veto power Qualified versus Absolute Veto -Messaged veto versus Packet Veto No “pocket veto” in the Philippines. What is pocket veto? Atl see. 7 of US. Const “If any bill shall not be returned by the Presidet within ten days (Sundays excepted) after shall have been presented o him, the same shall bea lane in ike manner as if he had signcd i, unless the Congress by their adjournment prevent its return in which cave tsa ng bealaw.” Art VI see. 27 Compare 1935 Const, Art. VI sec. 20 GONZALES VS. MACARAIG, 191 SCRA 452 (1990) BENGZON VS. DRILON, 208 SCRA 133 (1909) PCA VS. ENRIQUEZ 235 SCRA 506 (1904) BELGICA VS. OCHOA 710 SCRA 1 2013) DELA CRUZ V, OCHOA, G.R.No, 219683 2018) Legislative Veto ABAKADA VS. PURISIMA 562 SCRA 251 (2008) Page 160302. Informing funetio © Other non-teg ‘Atcle VI, Section 12 ‘omer of impeachment CORONA VS. SENATE 676 SCRA 563 (2012) REPUBLIC VS. SERENO, G.R. No. 237428 (2018) RED SERENO, G.R. No, 237428 (June 19, 2018) (1) Who are subject to impeachment {Ant XI, see. 2 (OFFICE VS, MOIICA - 452 SCRA 714 (2005) GONZALES VS. OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT 714 SCRA 611 (2014) (2) Grounds for impeachment ‘Ant XI, ee, 2 ©) Procedure for impeachment ‘Article XI, see. 3(1)}(6) FRANCISCO VS. NMMP, INC. 425 SCRA 44 (2003) GUTIERREZ VS, HR COMMITTEE 643 SCRA 198 (2011) (4) Consequence of impeachment Amicle XI, sec. 3(7) ESTRADA VS. DESIERTO 356 SCRA 108 (2001) ive powers 8. Actas board of eanvasses for Presidential and Vice Presidential elections ‘Art VIL, Sec. 4, par. 4 BRILLANTES VS. COMELEC 432 SCRA 269 (2004) »b. Call special election for President and Vice President Att. VIL, See. 10 « Revoke or extend suspension of privilege of habeas corpus or declaration of ‘martial aw Art. VIL, See 18, 4. Approve Presidential Amnesties ‘Art VIL, Sec. 19 €. Conti certain appointments ‘Ant VIL, Sec. 9 and See, 16 Concur in Treaties ‘Art. VIl, See. 21 (through the Senate) CF: Sec. 25, Art. XVIIL, 1987 Constitution BAYAN VS. ZAMORA 2 SCRA 449 (2000) VISITING FORCES AGREEMENT 342 SCRA 529 NICOLAS VS. ROMULO 578 SCRA 438 (2009) SAGUISAG VS, OCHOA 779 SCRA 241 (2016) IPAP V. OCHOA G.R. No. 204605 (2016) Page 7063A. Privileges, inhibitions 1. Declaration of war a delegation of emergency powers ‘Ant VI, Sec. 23 DAVID VS, MACAPAGAL-ARROYO 489 SCRA 160 (2006) (PP 1D17 - Declaration of State of National Emergency) 1. Be judge ofthe President's physical fitness or capacity ‘Ant VI, See. 11, par. i. Power with regard tothe uilization of natural resources ‘Ant XI, see. 2 EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT dl disqualifieations The Presiden 1 Qualifications, eletion, term and oath Art VIL, ses, 2,4 and 5 TECSON VS. COMELEC 424 SCRA 277 (2004) POE, JR. VS. MACAPAGAL 454 SCRA 142 (2005) POE'LLANZAMARES V. COMELEC (2016) ANNOTATION ON TERM LIMITATION 582 SCRA 774 (09) Privilege and salary ‘Art. VI, see. 6 1. Presidential immunity GLORIA VS. CA 338 SCRA 5 (2000) RODRIGUEZ VS, GMA 660 SCRA 98 2011) LOZADA VS, MACAPAGAL-ARROYO 670 SCRA 664 (2012) SAEZ V.S GMA 681 SCRA 686 (2012) 2. Presidential privilege AKBAYAN VS. AQUINO 558 SCRA 468 NERI VS. SENATE COMMITTEE 549 SCRA 77 (2008); 564 SCRA 52 (2008) Vive President 1 Qualifieations election, term and oath At. VIL, sec. 3 Id, see. 4 Id, soe. $ Prohibitions Art, VIL, see. 3 1d, See 3, pat. 2 4 Succession ‘Art, VIL see. 9 Removal An. XI, sees. 2-3 &. Funetions (@) Right of suecession (Art VIL, sees. 8 and 11) {@) Membership in Cabinet (Art, VIL, see. 3, par. 2) Page 10630B. Powers, 1. Executive ‘administrative powers in gener 4 Powers and Funetion ofthe President (0) Exeeutive Povwer Art Vil sees, | andl 17 OPLE VS, TORRES 293 SCRA 141 (1998) KMU VS. DIRECTOR GENERAL 487 SCRA 623 (2006) REVIEW CENTER VS. ERMITA 583 SCRA 428 (2009) ARAULLO VS. AQUINO Ill 728 SCRA I (2014) SAGUISAG VS, OCHOA 779 SCRA 241 (2016) (©) Residual powers MARCOS V, MANGLAPUS 177 SCRA 668; 178 SCRA 760 (1989) 2. Power of appointment general Limitations on appointing power of the President; Midnight Appointments Art VIL, secs, [3 and 15 IN RE: HON. MATEO A. VALENZUELA 298 SCRA 408 (1998) DE RAMA VS. CA 353 SCRA 94 (2001) PUBLIC INTEREST VS. ELMA 494 SCRA 53 (2006) LIBAN VS, GORDON 593 SCRA 68 (2000) DE CASTRO VS. JBC 615 SCRA 666 (2010); 618 SCRA 629 (2010) PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT V, MARCO, G.R. No, 202331 2015) Interim or Recess Appointments ‘Art. VI, see. 19 ‘Art. Vil, soe. 16, par. 2 CONCEPCION BAUTISTA VS. SALONGA 172 SCRA 1601989) ‘Temporary Designations ‘Adm. Code of 1987, Bk, II, see. 17 Limitations on appointing power of Acting President Ant VI, sees. 14-16 Prohibitions ‘Art. VIL, ee. 13, CLU VS. EXECUTIVE SECRETARY 194 SCRA 317 (1991) NATIONAL AMNESTY VS. COA 437 SCRA 6S (2004) BITONIO VS. COA 425 SCRA 437 (2004) PUBLIC INTEREST VS, ELMA 494 SCRA 53 (2006) PUBLIC INTEREST VS. ELMA 517 SCRA 336 (2007), FUNA VS. AGRA 691 SCRA 196 (2013) ‘Compare probibitions against other officials Art. VI, see. 3 Ant IX, A, see. 2 Art IX, B, sec, 7 Art. Vill, see. 12 Page 19030Exceptions to rule prohibiting executive officials from holding additional positions iy Vice President as member ofthe Cabinet (Art VIL, see. 3, par. 2) {Gy Secretary of Justice as members of Judicial and Bar Council (Art. Vt see. 8(0) 10) Ex officio postions '. Commission on Appointments confirmation MANALO VS. SISTOZA 312.SCRA 239 MATIBAG VS. BENIPAYO 380 SCRA 49 SORIANO VS, LISTA 399 SCRA 437 (2004) PIMENTEL VS. ERMITA 472 SCRA 587 (2005) (@) Heads of Departments At. VI, se. 16 (&) Ambassadors, publie ministers, and consuls ‘Ant, VI, sec. 16 (6) Officers ofthe armed forces fy Art Vil, soe. 16 (@) Chainman and Members ofthe Constitutional Commissions ‘Art IX, B. see. 12) 14,C, see. 12) Id, D, see. 12) (e) Regular Members ofthe Judicial and Bar Cound ‘At. VIll, see 8 @) (9 Sectoral Representatives ‘Art, XVIII, sc. 7~RA 7941 QUINTOS-DELES VS. COMMISSION ON APPOINTMENTS 177 SCRA 2591992) ror the rank of colone! and naval captain Upon recommendation ofthe Judicial andthe Bar Council a) Members of the Supreme Court an all other ert (Art, VILL, see. 9) NGUINALDO V. AQUINO, G.R. NO, 224302, NOVEMBER 2016 ACUINALDO V. AQUINO, G.R. NO. 224302, FEBRUARY 2017 (MR) (6) Ombudsman and Deputies (Art. XI, se. 9) IEURUNG V, CARPIO MORALES (2018) {c) Appointincnt ofthe Viee President as member of the Cabinet (Art. VI, se. 3) (a) Appointment solely by the President ‘Att Vil, sec. 16) Ce Hhose whose appointments are not otherwise provided by law (0) Those whom he may be authorized by law to appoint BERMUDEZ VS. TORRES 311 SCRA 733 (1999) RUFINO VS. ENDRIGA 496 SCRA 13 (2006) 3. Power of control and supervision Control vs. Supervision a. Doctrine of qualified politieal agency ene RETARY VS. MABALOT 378 SCRA 128 (2002) DENK VS. DENR EMPLOYEES 409 SCRA 359 (2003) CONSTANTINO VS. CUISIA 472 SCRA 505 (2005) RUFINO VS. ENDRIGA 496 SCRA 13 2000) ANGELES VS. GAITE 646 SCRA 309 2011) AINNALANG VS. TIDCORP 692 SCRA 359 (2013) MAN AIVEROS-BARAQUEL VS TRB 751 SCRA 271 (2015)ive departments and offices Control of executive department ‘Ant. Vil, see, 17 BUKLOD VS. ZAMORA 460 SCRA 718 (2001) ANAK MINDANAO VS, EXECUTIVE 531 SCRA $83 (2007) BANDA VS. ERMITA 614 SCRA 488 (2010) ©. Local government General supervision of local governments and autonomous regions ‘AM X, 800.4 Id, see 16 GANZON VS. COURT OF APPEALS 200 SCRA 271 (1991) JOSON VS, TORRES 290 SCRA 279 (1998) PIMENTEL VS. AGUIRRE 336 SCRA 201 (2000) BITO-ON VS, FERNANDEZ. 350 SCRA 732 (2001) NATIONAL LIGA VS, PAREDES 439 SCRA 130 (2004) VILLAFUERTE VS, ROBREDO 744 SCRA 534 (2014) 4. Military pow Powers of Commaner-in- Chief Ant VU, see. 18 Att I, Se. 13, Ant. VII, See. 1, par. Alimmed: LANSANG VS. GARCIA, 42 SCRA 448 (1971) Overruled: GARCIA-PADILLA VS, PONCE ENRILE,121 SCRA 472 (1983) IBP VS. ZAMORA 338 SCRA 81 (2000) LACSON VS. PEREZ.357 SCRA 756 (2001) SANLAKAS VS. EXECUTIVE 421 SCRA 656 (2004) DAVID VS, MACAPAGAL-ARROYO 489 SCRA 160 (2006) GUDANI VS. SENGA 498 SCRA 671 (2006) FORTUN VS, MACAPAGAL-ARROYO 668 SCRA 504 (2012) LAGMAN VS. MEDIALDEA, JULY 5, 2017; DECEMBER 5, 2017 PADILLA V. CONGRESS, JULY 25, LAGMAN V. PIMENTEL, FEBRUARY 6, 5. Pardoning power a. Nature and limitations >. Forms of exeeutive clemency Art. VI, sec. 19 Art IX, C, see.5 PEOPLE VS. SALLE JR., 250 SCRA 581 (1995) IN RE: TORRES, 251 SCRA 700 (1993), PEOPLE VS. CASIDO 269 SCRA 44 (1997) PEOPLE VS. PATRIARCA 341 SCRA 464 (2000) MAGDALO VS. COMELEC 673 SCRA 651 (2012) RISOS-VIDAL VS, COMELEC 747 SCRA 210 (2015) (0) Pardon distinguished from probation PEOPLE VS, VERA 65 PHIL 56 (1087) (by Pardon distinguished from parole TESORO VS. DIRECTOR OF PRISONS 68 PHIL 154 1939) TORRES VS. GONZALES, 152 SCRA 272 (198) () Pardon distinguished from anmesty HARIIOQUINTO VS. FERNANDEZ, 85 PHIL 642 (1040) Page 21 of 30(a) Elects of Parl ‘CRISTOBAL VS, LABRADOR, 71 PHIL. 34 (1940) FELOBELLO VS, PALATINO 72 PHIL. 441 (1941) LACUNA VS. ABES 24 SCRA 780 (1968) MONSANTO VS. FACTORAN, 170 SCRA 190 (1989) ) Sanctions for violations of conditional pardons TORRES VS. GONZALES 152 SCRA 272 (1987) (9 Does pardoning poser apply to administrative cases? LLAMAS VS, EXECUTIVE 202 SCRA 844 (1991) (©) Who may avail of amnesty PEOPLE VS. PATRIARCA 341 SCRA 464 (2000) 6. Diplomatic power Contracting and guaranteeing foreign loans Art. VI, see. 20) ‘Ant. XII, see, 21 CONSTANTINO VS. CUISIA 472 SCRA 505 (2005) b. Power over foreign affairs VINUYA VS. ROMULO 732 SCRA 595 (2014) (@) Treaty making Ant VIL, see21 BAYAN VS. EXECUTIVE 342 SCRA 449 (2002) PIMENTEL VS. OFFICE 462 SCRA 265 (2005) () Treaty distinguished from executive agreements ©. Deportation undesirable aliens ‘GO TEK VS, DEPORTATION BOARD 79 SCRA 17 (1976) DOMINGO VS. SCHEER 421 SCRA 468 (04) ROSAS VS, MONTOR 772 SCRA 462 2015) Independent foreign policy LIM V. EXECUTIVE SECRETARY, G.R. NO. 151445 (2002) SAGUISAG V, EXECUTIVE SECRETARY, G.R, NO. 212426, JANUARY 12, Power over legislation (a) Message to Congress ‘Art VIL, se. (©) Preparation and submission ofthe budget and transferring savings between departments ‘Art VI, see. 22 |ARAULLO VS. AQUINO IIL728 SCRA 1 2014) NAZARETH VS. VILLAR 689 SCRA 385 (2013) (@ Velo power Art, VI, see27 BENGZON VS. DRILON, 208 SCRA 133 (1992) (a) Emergeney powers ‘Art. VI see. 23 (2) DAVID VS. MACAPAGAL-ARROYO 489 SCRA 160 (2006) Page22 of 30©) Fixing of tariff rates ‘Att VL, see. 28 (2) GARCIA VS. EXECUTIVE SEC., 211 SCRA 219 (1992) SOUTHERN CROSS VS, CEMENT 465 SCRA 532 (2005) . Rates of Success a Removal AML. XI, sees, 23 b. Succession ESTRADA VS. DESIERTO 353 SCRA 452 (2001), 356 SCRA 108 (2001) (0) Atthe beginning of term ‘Att VIL, see. 7 Id, see. 10 (2) During tenn Att VI, ee. 8 1M, sce 10 (8) In ease of temporary disability ‘Ant. VIL, se. VI, ses, 11-12 Case BORIA VS, COMELEC 295 SCRA 157 1998) JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT A. Concepts CCUDIA VS, PMA 751 SCRA 469 (2015) FEBTC VS. CHUA 762 SCRA 128 2015) CAWAD VS. ABAD 764 SCRA 1 (2015) BARROSO VS, OMELIO 772 SCRA 437 (2015) ‘CARPIO-MORALES VS. CA 774 SCRA 431 (2015) TANOG VS, BALINDOG 777 SCRA 467 (013) OSMENA VS. ABAYA 781 SCRA 1 (2016) PHILCONSA VS. GPH, NOVEMBER 29, 2016 Art VIL, see. I Id, see. 3 REPUBLIC VS. DE GUZMAN 652.SCRA 101 (11) CUA VS. PEOPLE 660 SCRA 235 (2011) LORZANO VS. TABAYAG 665 SCRA 38 (2012) CHAVEZ VS. JBC 676 SCRA 579 (2012) BCDA VS. REYES 699 SCRA 217 (2013) REPUBLIC VS. ORTIGAS 717 SCRA 601 (2014) ‘Art. VIL see. 18, par3 Art. VIL, sec. 4, par.7 TECSON VS. COMELEC 424 SCRA 277 (2004) LEGARDA VS. DE CASTRO 542 SCRA [25 (08) MAKALINTA VS. PET 651 SCRA 239 (2011) An IX,A, 800.7Congressional power over jurisdiction of Supreme Cour Ant VII, see, 2, par. [Att Vi, sec, 30) FIRST VS. CA 237 SCRA 519 (1994) FABIAN VS. DESIERTO 295 SCRA 470 (1998) Court Martial REPUBLIC VS, ASUNCION, 231 SCRA 211 (1994) 2. Judicial reviews requisites Operative fact doctrine >, Moot questions «Political question doctrine 1B. Safepua Is of Sui Appointment and qualifications At. VIM, see. 7(1) Id, se. 8 (5) I. see. 9 IN RE: VALENZUELA 298 SCRA 408 (1998) DE CASTRO VS. IBC 615 SCRA 666 (2010), DE CASTRO VS. IBC 618 SCRA 639 (2010), RE: SENIORITY AMONG FOUR 631 SCRA 377 (2010) Fiscal autonomy At, VII, see.3 CSC VS. DEPARTMENT 464 SCRA 115 (2005) RE: CLARIFYING 481 SCRA 1 (2006) RE: COA OPINION 678 SCRA 1 2012) Salary ‘Ant VII, see. 17 ‘Art XVI, see. 17 PERFECTO VS. MEER, 85 PHIL, 522 (1950) ENDENCIA VS. DAVID, 93 PHIL, 696 (1953) Compare 1973 Const, Act. XV, see, 6 nol exempt from income tax NITAFAN VS, COMMISSIONER 152 SCRA 284 (1987), Security of Tenure ‘Art. VII, see. 11 I, 2 DE LA LLANA VS. ALBA, 112 SCRA 294 (1982) Removal ‘Art VIL, se. 11 ‘Art XI, see.2 IN RE: RAUL M. GONZALES, 160 SCRA 771 (1988) ‘Automatic release of appropriations forthe judiciary ‘Art VIIL, see. 3 No quasi-judicial and administrative work of judges ‘Amt. VIIL, sec. 12 IN RE JUDGE RODOLFO MANZANO, 166 SCRA 246 (198Report on the judiciary Aa. VII, soe. 16 .dulicial restraint FRANCISCO, JR VS, HOUSE, G.R, No. 160261, November 10, 2003 CENTRAL BANK VS. BANGKO SENTRAL, GR. NO. 148208, December | |AASIS VS. DATUMANONG, G.R, NO. 160869, MAY 11, 2007 2004 D. Appointments to the Judiciary ial and Bar Council At VII, sec. 8 DE CASTRO VS. JBC 615 SCRA 666 (2010); 618 SCRA 639 (2010) CHAVEZ VS. JBC 676 SCRA 579 (2012) CHAVEZ VS. JBC 696 SCRA 496 (2013) JARDELEZA VS, SERENO 738 SCRA 729 (2014) VILLANUEVA VS. JBC 755 SCRA 182 2015) AGUINALDO VS, AQUINO, NOVEMBER 29, 2016; FEBRUARY 21 E, Supreme Court ‘Composition Ant VII, see. ‘SC Resolution No, 2-89 PUBLIC INTEREST VS. ELMA 517 SCRA 336 (2007) CITY OF TAGAYTAY VS. GUERRERO 600 SCRA 33 (2009) 1. En bane and division eases Manner of sitting and votes required At, VII, see. 4 Rule 56, se, 7(1997 Rules on Civil Procedure) alle 125, see. 3 (2000 Rules on Criminal Procedure) LEAGUE OF CITIES VS, COMELEC 608 SCRA 636 (2009) AM-99-1.09 $C Requirements as to decisions ‘Amt Vill, ses. 13-14 MANGELEN VS, CA, 215 SCRA 230 (1992) GERMAN MACHINERIES VS. ENDAYA 444 SCRA 323 (2004) PEOPLE VS, SANDIGANBAYAN 628 SCRA 502 (2010) LUMANOG VS, PEOPLE 630 SCRA 42,2010) ‘Mandatory period for deeiding cases, Aa. VIL see. 1S Ant. VI, sec. 18, par.3 ‘Art. XVI, sees. 12 ‘OCA VS, FUENTES III 692 SCRA 429 (2013), IN RE: CARBONELL 700 SCRA 806 (2013) RE: CASES OF JUDGE BALUNA 704 SCRA 415 (21 2. Procedural making ‘Art. VIIL, see. $ (5) YLAYA VS, GACOTT 689 SCRA 452 (2013) PONA V. LOBRIGO, AUGUST 15,2017 see 14 pa. 2 (practice of professions) ses. 18, pur 3ECHEGARAY VS. SECRETARY 301 SCRA 96 (1999) 3. Administrative supervision over lower courts Administrative powers (0) Supervision of lower courts CAOIBES VS, OMBUDSMAN 361 SCRA 395 FUENTES VS, OMBUDSMAN 368 SCRA 36 (2001) ADAIAR VS. DEVELOS 475 SCRA 361 (2005) CSC VS. RAMONEDA-PITA 696 SCRA 155 (13) IN RE: REQUEST FOR GUIDANCE 708 SCRA 502 (2013) (2) Temporarily assign judges to ther stations inthe public interest Ait Vil, see, 5(3) (6) Order a change of venue or place of trial to avoid misearriage of justice Art VIL, see. (4) 4) Discipline of judges ‘Art Villy Soe, 1 PEOPLE VS. GACOTT 246 SCRA 52 (1996) (5) Appointment of officials and employees of entre judiciary ‘Ant. VII, se. (6) 4. Original and appellate juris Article VIM, Section 4 Article VIM, Section 5 Writs of amparo, habeas data, and the environmental writ of kalasan Lower courts 4 Quiliications and appointment ‘Art VII, see. (1) (2) Id, see. 8(5) 1d, sec. 9 RE: SENIORITY AMONG FOUR APPOINTMENTS 631 SCRA 377 2010) b. Salary Ant VIII, se. 10 Congressional power to reorganize and security of tenure ‘Ant VILL, se. I Id, see. 2 par. 2 DELA LLANA VS. ALBA, 112 SCRA 294 (1982) 4. Removal At. VII, see. 11 PEOPLE VS. GACOTT 246 SCRA 521996) Jurisdiction At, VII, see 1 YNOT VS. IAC, 148 SCRA 659 (1987) tion of decisions Requirements as to prey At, VIM, see. 152. Mandatory period for deciding Ant. VII, soe. 1S ‘Ant. XVIII, sees. 12-14 ‘ADAO VS. LORENZO 316 SCRA 570 (1999) VL CONSTITUTIONAL COMMISSIONS, nddependence of commissions B. Powers and functions of each commission €. Prohibited offices and interests D. Jurisdiction of each const 1 commission E. Review of final orders, resolutions, and decisions 1. Rendered in the exercise of quasi-judicial functions 2. Rendered in the exercise of administrative functions 1 CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION Composition and qu Art IX,B, see. 1 (1) ‘Art. Vil, see. 13, par. 2 CAYETANO VS, MONSOD, 201 SCRA 210 (1991) ications of Commissioners Powers BARCELONA VS. LIM 724 SCRA 433 2014) MAMISCAL VS. ABDULLAH 761 SCRA 39 (2015) DOF VS, DELA CRUZ 768 SCRA 73 (2015) ‘TORRES VS, DE LEON 781 SCRA 110 2016) Appointment and term of office of Commissioners; Rule against reappointment Ant IX B, see. 12) NACIONALISTA VS. ANGELO BAUTISTA, 85 PHIL, 101 (1949) BRILLANTES VS. YORAC, G.R. NO, 93867, DEC. 18, 1990 NP-VS, VERA, 85 PHIL. 149 (1951) REPUBLIC VS, IMPERIAL, 96 PHIL. 770 (1985) GAMINDE VS. COA 347 655 (2000) Appointment of personnel of CSC [Ant IX, A, see. 4 & Salary ‘Art, XVI, see. 17 Art IX, A, see.3 fe Disqualifications Ant IX, A, see. 2 1. Impeachment Art XI, sev Appeal - CAPABLANCA VS. CSC 605 SCRA 61 (2009) he Scope of the eivl service At IX, B, see. 2()) For definition of “government owned or controlled corporations with ‘original charters.” See Art, XI, see. 16 BLISS DEVELOPMENT Y. FERRER-CALL JUCO VS. NLRC 277 SCRA 528 (1997) Page 27 30 A. 1904HDME VS. COA 432 SCRA 126 2004) PNB VS. TEJANO 604 SCRA 147 (2009) 2. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS BARRO VS. COMELEC (1°¥ DIVISION) 603 SCRA 292 (2009) CAGAS VS. COMELEC 663 SCRA 644 (2012) JALOSIOS VS, COMELEC 674 SCRA 530 (2012) LOKIN JR VS. COMELEC 674 SCRA 538 SEVILLA VS. COMELEC 693 SCRA 605 (2013) REYES VS, COMELEC 699 SCRA 522 2013) REYES VS. COMELEC 703 SCRA 197 2013) LEGASPI VS. COMELEC 768 SCRA 484 (2015) ‘CABALLERO VS. COMELEC 771 SCRA 213 (2015) KABATAAN VS. COMELEC 777 SCRA 574 (2015), ENGLE VS. COMELEC 781 SCRA 201 (2016) RIVERA VS. COMELEC 790 SCRA 443 (2016) ABAYON VS. HRET 791 SCRA 242 (2016), Composition and qualifications of Commissioners ‘Art IX, C, see. 1(1) At. Vil, sec. 13, pat, 2 4 Appointment and term of office of Commissioners Rule auainst reappointment At. IX,C, see. 1) © Appointment of personnel An IX, A, $60.4 4. Salary ‘Ant IX, A, see. 3 Art XVI, soo. 17 ¢Disqualifcations [Ant IX, A, see. 2 Impeachment ‘Ant. XI, see. 2 & Appeal ‘Case ~ GANCES VS. CA. 259 SCRA 99 (1996) 3. COMMISSION ON AUDIT VELOSO VS, COA 656 SCRA 767 2011) AGRA VS, COA 661 SCRA 563 (2011) COCOFED VS. REPUBLIC 663 SCRA S14 2012) \VERZOSA VS. CARAGUE 665 SCRA 124 (2012) DELOS SANTOS VS. COA 703 SCRA SDI (2013) PUNA VS. VILLAR 670 SCRA 579 2012) FUNA VS. MANILA OFFICE 715 SCRA 247 (2015) TESDA VS. COA 718 SCRA 402 2014) NHA VS. ROXAS 773 SCRA 358 (2015) PARAISO-ABAN VS COA 780 SCRA 235 (2016) NAYONG PILIPINO V.PULIDO TAN. ET AL... SEPTEMComposition and qualifications Art. IX, D, see. 1 (1) Att. VIL, sec. 12, par. 2 Appointment And term of commissioners Art, IX, D, see, 1 (2) Appointment of COA personnel AMLIX, A, see. 4 4 Salary AMLIX, A, see. 3 Art. XVIII, see. 17 © Disqualifications A, see. 2 Art IN & Impeachment Att. XI, see, 2 & Appeal 105 SCRA 512 (1999) REYES VS, COA 3} REBLORA VS, AFP 698 SCRA 727 (2013) NATIONAL ECONOMY AND PATRIMONY A. Regalian doctrine Id, See. 3 PUBLIC ESTATES, G, NLU BICOL V. TRANS. B. Nationalist and citizensh Aaticle XI, Sec. 2 Id, Sec. 10, la, See. 11 iilization of natural resources €. Exploration, development, Article XU, See. 1 1d, See. 2 REPUBLIC VS. PROVINCIAL Gi ‘and certificates for public utilities D. Franchises, authority, Article XI, Sec. 11 nd transfer of pub 5.7.8 E. Acquisition, ownership Article XI, Sees. 3,4, F. Practice of professions Article XI, See. 14 Paze29 of 391H. Monopolies, restraint of trade and wn Article XIl, Sov, 14 ROY VS, HERBOSA, G.R. NO, 207246, NOVEMBER 22, 2016; APRIL 18,2017 REPUBLIC V, ESPINOSA, APRIL 5, 2017 [REVERSION PROCEEDINGS] REPUBLIC V, HEIRS OF MEYNARDO CABRERA, NOVEMBER 8, 2017 LEONIDAS V. VARGAS, DECEMBER 14, 2017 REPUBLIC V. ROVENCY REALTY, JANUARY 10,2018 XIV. OCI JUSTICE AND HUMAN RIGHTS A. Concept of socal justice Article I, Sec. 10 Amiel XI, See. 15, Asiele XII, Ses. 1,2 B. Commission on Human Rights Article XII, Sees. 17, 18, 19 1. Composition and Qualifications [See. 17, Ar. XII] BAUTISTA VS. SALONGA, APRIL 13, 1989 2. Powers and Funetions (Sees. 18 and 19, Art XII] SIMON VS. CHR, JANUARY 5, 1994 3. Fiscal Autonomy (See. 17(4), Art. XII] CHREA VS. CHR, JULY 21, 2006 Page 300690