You are on page 1of 5

THE PROFESSIOI{AL VOICE OF LAW ENFORCEMENIT DECEMBER 2AA4

Repffigil*lfiffi
of Sociology, George
By RonaldWeitzer, Professor of Sociology, and Steoen A. Tuch, Professot
Wnshington Llnio ersity, Washington, D,C.

\Mhat specific changes, if any, does the public want to see in scientific samplit g techniques with the reach and capabililies of the
police ptu.ti.es? Surpriiingly, this qrrestion has seldom been inves-
Internet to yieid representitive samples of respondents without sac-
ilgated. Rather, it is simply uss.t*ed that the public overwhelming- rificing daiaquality The study was funded by ugrant to the authors
justice.l
lyiurrors any and all reforms-but this is an untested assumption. from the U.S Department of ]ustice's National Institute of
The study examined three major types of innovations in polic-
It is important to examine public preferences for police reform
for three reasons. First, such knowledg" should be useful for ad- i^g' (1) raciil di.r.rsification of police departments, (2) increased
ministrators in developing policy and instituting n_ew practices. u.Io.nttability (both monitoring and sanctions), and (3) changes
designed to ir'r.r.ure police responsiveness and sensitivity to civil-
Where popular suppoit for b spe.ific change is widespread, this
may be symptomatic of a probiem that needs to be addressed. If ians. On almost every issue, blacks and Hispanics are more
implemented, the reforrn may help to reduce poljce misconduct or inclined than whites to endorse reform. Nevertheless, a substantial
ir11ptorre police practices more generally. Second, certain kinds of
number of whites also favor most of these policies.
ref^orms may inirease public trust and confidence in the police.
Third, reforms that directly affect police-citizen encounters may Raci al D ia er sific ati on
increase citizens' willingness to cooperate with officers'
To investigate these Isrrr.r, the authors conducted a nationwide
The principle of matching the racial composition of a police
poll of a representative sample of Americans in late 2002. The sam- department to that of the city is now-widely a_c91pted in American
pl. .ot-rsisted of I,792addtJ(age 18 and over) residing it't Tetropol-
poiiti.ul and law enforcement circles. The U.S. Department of
agency
itan areas of at least 100,000 peisot'ts. A special strength of this study iustice, for instance, holds that "a diverse law enforcement
can better develop relationships with the community it serves/ Pro-
is that it included large samples of black and Hispantc clttzens/
allowing an examination of racial-ethnic differences in views about mote trust in the fairness of Lw enforcement, and facilitate effec-
policingl fn. survey was conducted for the authors by lftow]edge tive policin gby encouraglng citizen suPPort Td cooPeruqol Law
i{etwJrks, a Web-based survey research firm that combines enfo?ce*"rrjt agencier rhorld seek to hire a diverse worKorce."2

Circle no. on 36 Reader Response Card


Circle no.47 on Reader Response Card

26 THE POLICE CHIEF/DECEMBER 2OO4


ffi Blocks

ft$i Hisponics
itiri whttes

Fig l. Percentoge Fovoring Rociol Diversificotion Fig 2. Percentoge Fovoring Monitoring of Street Stops

In-Cor
Minority Officer Video Comeros
in Minority Areos

Preferences Record Informotion


in Hiring on Drivers

Diversity in
Principle

40 50

Fig 3. Percentoge Fqvoring Accountobility Reforms Fig 4. Percentqge Fovoring Community Policing ond Sensitivity

Eorly Worning Police-Community


Meetings

Civilion Reviev Police Progroms


in Schools

Stronger More Sensitivity


Punishment Troining

www.ENTENMANN- ROYIN. com


800-5 81-3535 or 323-27 8-1999
Fax: 323-278- 1980
2425 S. GARFIELD AVENUE, COMMERCE, CA 9OO4O

Circle no. 5 on Reader Response Card Circle no.2l on Reader Response Card

THE POLICE CHIEF/DECEMBER 2OO4 27


Nevertheless, most police departments have proportionally fewer supported civilian review boards to hear citizen complaints and
minorities than the jurisdictions they serve.3 stronger punishment for officers who engage in misconduct.
The survey examined whether people view racially representa- Citizens strongly approve of police accountability. Most resPon-
tive police departments as a good thing in principle, and whether dents-three-fourths of whites and more than eight in 10 blacks
they believe that more minority officers should be hired. The over- and Hispanics-favor an early warning system to help identify
whelming majority of Americans think that it is a good idea for officers who receive several citizen complaints. Similar majorities
"the racial makeup of a city's police department to be sirnilar to the of blacks and Hispanics, and two-thirds of whites, want video
racial makeup of that chty" (see figure 1). Whites are slightly more cameras installed in police cars to more closely monitor officer
supportive of this principle than blacks or Hispanics. behavior (see figure 2).
On the question of whether minorities should be given prefer- Majorities of all three groups also believe that racial profiling will
ences in hiring to increase their representation in police depart- be reduced if officers record the drivers' race, d1e,gender, the reason
ments (see figure 1), only one-fifth of whites support this notion, for the stop, whether a search was conducted and arrest made, and
compared to about half of blacks and Hispanics. \Mhites'reluctance whether the citizen resisted the officer. Interestin gly, this is one
to endorse this policy is consistent with their opposition to affirma- of the few policies that yield greater suPPort among whites
tive action generally, especially when the question asks about (66 percent) than among blacks (58 percent) or Hispanics (54 per-
cent). Minoriry group members may believe that such information
Sving minorities preferential treatment in hiti.g and promotion.
Should more minority officers be assigned to minority neigh- gathering is a good idea, but th.y are less optimistic than whites in
borhoods? The overwhelming majority of blacks and Hispanics believing that this will help to reduce stops based on racial profiling.
believe that such assignments would improve policing in their city. Do people want civilian review boards in their cities? TWo-
Fewer whites, however, support this policy. thirds of whites, three-quarters of Hispanics, and four-fifths of
blacks do. Even more respondents from each goup believe that
policing will be improved by " stronger punishment of officers who
Incre as e d Ac co unt ab ility engage in misconduct against citizens" (see figure 3).
Mechanisnrs of accountability include (1) methods of monitor-
ing officer behavior and (2) sanctions for officers who engage in C ommunity P olicing and S ensitiaity
misconduct. With regard to greater monitoring, the survey asked
respondents whether they favor installing video carneras in police Other changes have the potential to increase police responsive-
cars,a so-called early warning systems to flug officers who receive ness to, sensitivity to, and understanding of citizens and their
several complaints from citizens,s and a policy of recording infor- communities. The survey examined several policies in this area.
mation-including race-about all motorists stopped by officers. One involves more sensitivity training for police officers, and two
With regard to sanctions, respondents were asked whether they fall under the rubric of community policing-more meetings

DOGS
o Drug Dgtector Dogs
(four odors)
o Explosive Detector
Dogs (eight odors)
o Import Police Certified
Dogs
o Arsotr, Mine-Finding
and Tracker Dogs
Additionally, Global offers:
Dog and Certification of Team
Annual Evaluations/Certifications
Supervisor and Trainer Courses
Many Types and Services Available

Global Training Academy, Inc.


P.O. Box 445
Somerset, TX 78069
21 0 / 622'9 460 ( primary)
210 / 680-9068 (alternate)
830/429-3122 (fax)
800/777 -5984 (toll free)

In bustness since 19M.


Texas License C-4522

Circle no. 19 on Reader Response Card Circle no.24 on Reader Response Card

28 THE POLICE CHIEF/DECEMBER 2OO4


between the police and conununity residents and more police Pro- Research Conclusion
grams in the schools. A substantial majority of all three grouPs
favors each of these policies (figure 4). Blacks are most likely to Popular support for police reform may be useful to police exec-
support each policy (84 percent or more blacks do so), and Hispan- utives and other law enforcement officials. If the public over-
ics are more likely than whites to do so. whelmingly approves of a reform, this may be indicative of a
The survey also asked a more general question (not shown problem that needs fixing. Certain changes (such as intensive sen-
itr fig*e 4) about community policing. Community policing was sitivity training and greater monitothg) may help to reduce specif-
defined as "police officers working with community members to ic kinds of police malpractice or improve police practices overall,
address the causes of crime and to prevent crimes from occurring, while other reforms (such as hiring more minority officers) aPPear
rather than just respondi.g to crimes after they have occurred." to be symbolically important and may increase citizen confidence
Respondents who reported that there was no community policing in a police department. This research shows that popular support
in their owrr neighborhood were asked if they wanted community for police reforms, though widespread, is not monolithic: support
policing in their neighborhood. Sixty-nine percent of whites, 73 per varies by the particular policy in question and, for some policies, by
cent of Hispanics, and Tspercent of blacks said that th.y wished the racial-ethnic group. Such information should be useful to practi-
police practiced community policing in their neighborhood. tioners in their attempts to improve police-citizen relations.
The survey asked two other questions related to the issue of Po- Of course, there are other, standard police practices that the
lice responsiveness toward civilians (not shornm in figure 4). First, public does not want changed. For instanc€, h our survey, 91' per-
betweeng2 and 96 percent of the three groups agree with the fol- cent of whites, blacks, and Hispanics agree that the Miranda rtghts
lowing statement: "When a police officer stops a Person on the should be retained. This is consistent with another poll, which
street or in a car, the officer should be required to explain to the found that 86 percent of Americans agreed with a Supreme Court
person the reason for the stop." Although many officers do this decision in 2000 upholding the Miranda ru1e.6 *
1A full description oT the research methods and fhdings is presented in U.S. Department
routinely, others do not, and it is clear that this simple act can help of Justice, Office ofJustice Progams, National lnstitute of Justice, "Rethinking Minority Attitudes
to reduce tensions during street stops. Second, from 77 to 88 per- toward the Police," by Ronald Weitzer and Steven A. Tuch, tnFinnl Tecluticnl Report (Washington,
cent of the three groups believe that "When a police officer stops D.C.: U.S. Government Printing ffice, 2004).
2U.S. Department of
Justice, Principles t'or Promotittg Police Integrity (Washington, D.C.: U.S.
and searche s a cttrzen and his or her vehicle, and finds no evidence
Govemment Printing Office, 2001).
of a crime, the officer should be required to apol oglze to the citizen 3
U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics, Lniu Ent'orcement Mnnngement nnd
for the inconvenience of the search." Most members of all three Administrntiae Stntistics,2000 (Washingon, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 2004).

groups strongly agree with each of these policies. People clearly


+
In 2000 the COPS Office awarded $12 million to 41 state law enforcement agencies to
purchase 2,900 in-car cameras.
feel that it is important that police officers treat citizens fairly and 5See U.S. Department of
Justice, Office of ]ustice Programs, National Institute of Justice,
"Eat|y
with respect, and such practices have the potential to improve Waming Systems: Responding to the Problem Police O[hcer," by Samuel Walker, Geoffrey Alpert,
and Dennis Kenney, tnResenrch inBrief (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Govemment Printing Office,2001).
police-citizen interactions during encounters. 6National poll conducted for l,leusueekby Princeton Survey Research Associates (LexisNexis
Public Opinion Online, June 29-30 ,2000,N=752).

"'Y
ftT :P T . TTilS$.".-d;\ilS$ ti:t,;F',s "
lI fi*ffi " s*1ff 3

\-uus i*s* T"ex mW$m c.* $ ffi mmx g rt t +x fu m ffi *E $ft $


'.
OE=IGiN Ll\E|Ei 'il{*r i$#*Lxr}r"* m Tr$rx$ ffi *{urx$t"xr*fl;$eim [-]mi'h.
Real World Performance

Circle no. 54 on Reader Response Card

30 THE POLICE CHIEF/DECEMBER 2OO4

You might also like