You are on page 1of 2

Signifier and Signified

Description
Saussure's 'theory of the sign' defined a sign as being made up of the matched pair of signifier and signified.
SignifierThe signifier is the pointing finger, the word, the sound-image.A word is simply a jumble of letters. The
pointing finger is not the star. It is in the interpretation of the signifier that meaning is created.
SignifiedThe signified is the concept, the meaning, the thing indicated by the signifier. It need not be a 'real object'
but is some referent to which the signifier refers.The thing signified is created in the perceiver and is internal to
them. Whilst we share concepts, we do so via signifiers.Whilst the signifier is more stable, the signified varies
between people and contexts.The signified does stabilize with habit, as the signifier cues thoughts and images.

Discussion
The signifier and signified, whilst superficially simple, form a core element of semiotics.
Saussure's ideas are contrary to Plato's notion of ideas being eternally stable. Plato saw ideas as the root concept
that was implemented in individual instances. A signifier without signified has no meaning, and the signified
changes with person and context. For Saussure, even the root concept is malleable.
The relationship between the signifier and the signified is arbitrary (Saussure called this 'unmotivated'). A real
object need not actually exist 'out there'. Whilst the letters 'c-a-t' spell cat, they do not embody 'catness'. The French
'chat' is not identical to the English 'cat' in the signified that it creates (to the French, 'chat' has differences of
meaning). In French, 'mouton' means both 'mutton' and a living 'sheep', whilst the English does not differentiate.
Saussure inverts the usual reflectionist view that the signifier reflects the signified: the signifier creates the
signified in terms of the meaning it triggers for us. The meaning of a sign needs both the signifier and the signified
as created by an interpreter. A signifier without a signified is noise. A signified without a signifier is impossible.
Language is a series of 'negative' values in that each sign marks a divergence of meaning betweens signs. Words
have meaning in the difference and relationships with other words.
The language forms a 'conceptual grid', as defined by structural anthropologist Edmund Leach, which we impose
on the world in order to make sense.
Lacan defined the unconscious as being structured like language and dealing with a shifting set of signifiers. When
we think in words and images, these still signify: they are not the final signified, which appears as a more abstract
sensation. In that we can never know the Real, the external signified can neither be truly known.
Jaques Derrida criticized the neat simplicity of signs. The signifier-signified is stable only if one term is final and
incapable of referring beyond itself, which is not true. Meaning is deferred as you slide between signs

 Semiotics (also called Semiology) is the study of signs and their use. Two key elements of a sign are signifier and signified.
 Saussure defined Semiotics as 'the science of signs' with the purpose of understand systematic regularities from which
meaning is derived (and is hence a Structuralist and Constructionalist approach).

Structuralism assumes that things are the sum of their parts and the relationships between the parts, which are assembled
into the larger structure. Thus it combines separation and creation of a distinct part with relational combination of parts
into a greater whole. It seeks to describe meta-languages that describe the systems under scrutiny.Structuralism rejects the
purposeful human agent as the key force in history

You might also like