You are on page 1of 4

LLb 20503 Intro to Equity_ 2018/19 9/27/2018

LLB 20503 LEARNING OUTCOMES


LAW & EQUITY
OBJECTIVES OF THIS TOPIC –
To study the definition of equity
To understand the nature of equity
To identify the functions of equity in the development of
the English legal system
Topic 1: INTRODUCTION & NATURE OF
EQUITY
SEM 1 2018/19

LLB 20503 MURSHAMSHUL K MUSA (C) FUHA UNISZA 2

INTRODUCTION INTRODUCTION
Law of equity originated from a source which is very different
Concepts/
principles from the common law.
A study of the principles and rules developed & applied by the
Chancery Court.

Equity It is more concern with the conduct of parties in each situation
rather than just with the literal application of the law.
More philosophical in nature.
Its practical application is more evident in civil matters and
Remedies integrated with the substantive law principles.

LLB 20503 MURSHAMSHUL K MUSA (C) FUHA UNISZA 3 LLB 20503 MURSHAMSHUL K MUSA (C) FUHA UNISZA 4
LLb 20503 Intro to Equity_ 2018/19 9/27/2018

WHAT IS..?
WHAT IS EQUITY? Equity includes elements of natural justice, good conscience and
No standard or comprehensive definition fairness.
From Latin term “aequitas equitas” = fairness or Technically : the body of rules developed and applied by the
justice/equality High Court of Chancery in England. -“the body of principles
Popular definition – fairness/justice or the quality of being fair developed by the Court of Chancery prior to 1873 as since
& just modified by courts administering that jurisdiction”
Generally, it connotes equality or justice and derives its Encyclopedia Britannica: a system of law/ legal principles which
authority in the principles of natural justice have superseded or supplemented the Common law in case of
Legally - body of rules which exists by the side of common conflicts with natural justice .
law & supersedes the law in case of conflicts of law with justice
Function: when law becomes rigid and causes hardship, injustice or
and fair play.
defective; the Court will intervene when the acts/omission is
“against the conscience”
LLB 20503 MURSHAMSHUL K MUSA (C) FUHA UNISZA 5 LLB 20503 MURSHAMSHUL K MUSA (C) FUHA UNISZA 6

FUNCTIONS OF EQUITY EQUITY IN ANCIENT TIMES


As a gloss upon the common law to overcome the severity and deficiencies
of the common law rules; to ensure justice is carried out in the Courts. Aristotle, 23 centuries ago, defined equity as - that idea
Developed in responses to the rigid technical procedures of the common law of justice which contravenes and corrects the written law
- to supplement and mitigate the harshness of it. when it is in error. He regarded equity as the process
Sir Nathan Wright in then case of DUDLEY v DUDLEY (1705) Prec. Ch. 241 through which a deviant man-made law is brought in
described it as :- harmony with the law of God or the law of reason.
 “Equity is …. a moral virtue, which qualifies, moderates, and
reforms the rigour, hardness and edge of the law, … it does also assist the
To him, equity is more of judicial discretion which modifies
law where it is defective and weak in the constitution …. and defends the the administration of law than trying to supersede it.
law from crafty evasions, delusions, and … to support and protect the
common law from shifts and crafty contrivances against the justice of law. Early European civil law which was under the influence of
Equity therefore does not destroy the law, nor create it but assist it…” Roman Law identifies equity as similar to justice.

LLB 20503 MURSHAMSHUL K MUSA (C) FUHA UNISZA 7 LLB 20503 MURSHAMSHUL K MUSA (C) FUHA UNISZA 8
LLb 20503 Intro to Equity_ 2018/19 9/27/2018

ARISTOTLE DEFINES EQUITY… DIFFERENCES WITH COMMON LAW


“it is equity to pardon human failings, and to look to To best understand the differences, learn through
the lawgiver and not to the law; to the spirit and not
to the letter; to the intention and not to the action; to historical event.
the whole and not to the part …”
Basic differences lies in :
 Rhetoric I.XIII.1374a. -
“what creates the problem is that the equitable is just, The source/origin of each legal rules
but not the legally just but a correction of legal The set of remedies that each has to offer
justice. The reason is that all law is universal but about
some things it is not possible to make a universal The subject matter of each legal rules
statement which shall be correct.”
Ethics (v.x)

LLB 20503 MURSHAMSHUL K MUSA (C) FUHA UNISZA 9 LLB 20503 MURSHAMSHUL K MUSA (C) FUHA UNISZA 10

MAIN REFERENCES
RE -CAP
Equity & Equitable Remedies in Malaysia, 2016, by
Zuraidah Ali, Sh Zubaidah Syed Abdul Kader, Nor
Though initially the term equity starts as a vague Asiah Mohamad, Hamimah Hamzah, Lexis Nexis
concept involving fairness and justice and doing Equity & Trusts in Malaysia, 2nd Edition, 2013 by
what is right according to good conscience – these Mohsin Hingun & Wan Azlan Ahmad, Sweet &
equitable concepts have developed into solid Maxwell
principles which are applied in today’s legal Specific Relief Act 1950
justice system.
Any text book on Equity & Trusts either from UK or
E.G. - Concept of trust, estoppel. Australia – Scott Atkins
Articles in legal journals – Lexis Nexis, CLJ,
universities legal journals
LLB 20503 MURSHAMSHUL K MUSA (C) FUHA UNISZA 11 LLB 20503 MURSHAMSHUL K MUSA (C) FUHA UNISZA 12
LLb 20503 Intro to Equity_ 2018/19 9/27/2018

REFERENCES
EQUITY & TRUSTS IN MALAYSIA, 2ND EDITION – Chap 1.
R. EDWARDS & NIGEL STOCKWELL – TRUSTS & EQUITY
(BLACKSTONE) – Chap. 1.
SNELL’S ON EQUITY – Chap. 1
PETTIT (6th ed) – EQUITY & LAW OF TRUSTS – Chap. 1
HANBURY & MAUDSLEY – MODERN EQUITY – Chap. 1.

LLB 20503 MURSHAMSHUL K MUSA (C) FUHA UNISZA 13

You might also like