Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Arbitration Award Phillop Hoduk PDF

    Uploaded by

    Swoop
    144 views23 pages

    Original Title

    Arbitration Award Phillop Hoduk.pdf

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    144 views23 pages

    Arbitration Award Phillop Hoduk PDF

    Uploaded by

    Swoop

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 23
    SITCOMM ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION P.O. Box 41964 ‘Charleston, South Carolina 29423 +1877) 631-1722 Website: www. saalimited com Email: support@szalimited.com Office of the Director ‘This Certification is valid for use anywhere within the United States of America, its territories or possessions. This Certification does certify the content ofthe dacument for which it is issued. I, Sandra Goulette, Director of SITCOMM Arbitration Association, under and by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Federal Arbitration Act Title 9 Sectots 1-9 of the United States Code, Do Hereby Certify that: Keisha Jones ‘As Arbitrator has created and executedthe attached Arbitation Award, onthe date thereof; as duly qualified Arbitrator for SITCOMM Atbitration Association whose official acs as such should be given ful faith and creititfall Cours afd Justice ahd elsewhere In Testimony Whereof, I hereunto set ay hand and have caused to be affixed a Director's autograph, on this ("day AOU year of 4546 mont, i the yer of our Lord No. SAASIOWA-TOKDBNQ-TQRNCEL-S896:HUDOK SAA: HOHA“TSKDBNQ:TQRNCF2LX-5896 AB1OA-PH-001 SITCOMM ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION P.O. BOX 41964 Charleston, South Carolina 29423, +1677) 681-1722 ‘Website: saalimited.com ‘Email: support@saalimited.com FINAL ARBITRATION AWARD Sidting in the fdlont ition: Committeo Member? SANDRA GOULETTE LAUREL, MISSISSIPPI Arbitrator: KEISHA JONES ATHENS, GEORGIA In the Matter of the Arbitration Between the Following Parties: Phillip Hudok, BY AL,, CLAIMANT, v. Contract No. SAAPH-ABLOA-KI DONALD TRUMP, ET AL., JOHN ROBERTS JR., BY AL,, NANCY PELOSI, ET AL., WILLIAM BARR, ET AL., CHARLES GRASSLEY, ET AL., UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ET AL RESPONDENTS). 9 UNITED STATES CODES $1, 8, AND §9 ‘THE COMMON LAW ‘SEALED. SITCOMM ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION age | of21 SAA: HOHA/T9KDBN@-TQRNCF2LX-5896 ABLOA-PH-OOL INTHE MATTER OF THE ARBITRATION BETWEEN: 5 Philip Hudok, ET AL, § 5 § Contract Nou SAAPH-ASIOA-KI CLAIMANTS), 5 ¥ 5 § 9UNITED STATES CODES. DONALD TRUMP, ET AL. 5 §1,82, AND 9 JOHN ROBERTS JR, ET AL, 8 NANCY PELOSI, ET AL 5 WILLIAM BARR, ET AL, 5 (CHARLES GRASSLELY, BT AL. 5 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ET AL, 5 SEALED. ARBI! \WARD Breach or violation of required contract term ‘The partios have agrood that «jdgment af the court aba be entared upon the award made ‘purruant tothe arbitration, and shall specify the court, then at anytime within one year ater the cardia made any party tothe arbitration may apply to tho courte pected fran order confirming the award, and thereupon th cour must grant ach an order unless the award is ‘vacated, maid, or corrected as precribed in sections 10 and 11 ofthis Title If no cour ie specifi inthe agreement of the partie, then such application may be made tothe United States ‘court in and forthe district within which such award was made. Notice ofthe application shall bo served upon th adverse prty and thereupon the cour shall have uration of such party as ‘ough they had appeared generally inthe proceeding. Ifthe adverse party isa rsident ofthe Alstit within which the award was made, euch service shall be made upon the adverge party or ‘heir atiomey as prescribed by lw fr eeric of notice of motion in an aetion inthe same eour. I {he adverse party shall be nonresident, then the notice ofthe application shall be served by the marshal of any istrict within which the adverse party may be found in like manner as othar process ofthe court. Avitrators Name! Keisha Jones Hearing Location? Athens, Gongia ‘his Arbitrator, Keisha Jones: having considered the Claimants request fr dpe resolution on complaint finds the allowing Turaditional Allegations: 1, This Arbitrator has Subject Matter Jurisdiction, SM; as acknowledged by 9 U.S (Cotes §1, $2, §85 26 U.S. Code §§ 1846% and the established common law not limited to the following specifies 8, That Pillip Hudok is citizen ofthe state of West Virginia’ That the Respondent) 4, DONALD TRUMP, EI AL, SITCOMM ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION age 2021 ‘SAA: HOHA-T9KDBNQ-TQRNCF2LX-5896 ABLOA-PHL-O01 i, JOHN ROBERTS JRE AL, iil. NANCY PELOSI, ET Al,, vi WILLIAM BARR, ET AL., v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ET AL., iv. CHARLES GRASSLEY, EP AL. Have entered into an agrooment whereby they knowingly and intentionally agreed to ‘the folowing“. Failure and or refusal to respond and provide the requestd and necessary Proof of Chie al beheld and noted as agreed toby all partes, that n general response, a nonapcific response or failure to respond with apecifities and facts and conclusions of common law, andr to Provide the requested information and documentation that is necessary and in support ofthe ‘agreement shall constittea failure and a deliberate and intentional refusal o respond and 488 enlt thereby andor therein, expressing the defiulting pary’s consent and agreement to said facts ‘nd ae rsut ofthe selPexeeutng agrecment, the flowing is contingent upon thei allure to ‘respond in good fait, with specifiy, with fact and conchusions of common-law to each an every averment, condition, andor claim raised as they operat in fvor of tho Claimant, through “tacit scquieszonce.” Respondentls) NOT ONLY expresly affirm the truth and validity f sid facts set ‘stablished and agreed upon between the partis othe Conditional Acceptance for Value and counter oft lim for Proat of lai, also Respondent) have agreed and consented to Reapondents) having a duty and obligation to provide the requested and necessary Proof of Claims ‘hich has erated and established for Respondent) an estoppel in this matter(a, and ALL ‘matter rolating hereto’ and arising necessarily therefrom: and 2 "The above-captioned matter was set for arbitration after the receipt of the application ‘nd dispute resolution complaint on 0812/95 ana 4 "Tis Arbitrator has notified all parties listed above (a copy of proof of ntification is ‘permanently afixed to this record by referene) granting ench party the opportunity to submit ocumentation, records, proofs, evidence, exhibits, affidavits related to the instant matter the contract J9:16fGalewthghobS, its terme, premises, promises, and obligations on or about’ and 4, The Respondent) in a relatod action have made a claim against the Claimant ofthis ‘instant mattor related tothe Claimants interests andlor properties. There exists a matter in dispute andlor controversy associated with the contractual agreement, thereby extending juriniction to this body to proooed as per the terms ofthe agreement, a wall as rolevant laws and facts in support as resented during the arbitration ofthis controversy and 5. The parties entored into legally binding contractual relationship with each other and this Arbiteator finds that there is no fraud andlor any attempt to induce fraud andes to commit fraud, andor inducement of contract andlor fraud inthe factum respecting the instant matter and SITCOMM ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION Page3of21 SAA: HOHA-T9KDBNQ-TQRNCF2LX-5896 AB1OA-PH-001 contract Thus, the parties are bound by the terms and obligations agreed upon and imposed upon ‘thom as a direct result of the contratusl agreement: and 6 This Arbitrator finds that all the elements that form a contractual agreement and a legally ‘commercial binding obligatory relationship are presents and 1%. "The emiract clearly exprestos the method of setlement and resolution ofall disputes ‘vising thereunder shall be setled hy anbiteation under the authority ofthe standards of common Jaw arbitration, the Federal Arbitration Act, and further stipulated and appointed this Arbiteator Tisted herein as agroed upon as the Arbitentr of record. Neither party has objected, protested andlor sttempted to amend any portion andor provision at any time of the contract the contrac status that all inal and binding arbitration awards may be confirmed by any court in Ameren having original jurisdiction pursuant to Title 9 United States Codes §9 and $18 and 8% Tehas boen alleged and thoroughly proven thatthe Respondents listed above have by their own accord agred tall the terms ofthe contract, that they have committed the offenses ‘laimed in the contract and have acted aguinst the interests of the Claimant’, depriving them of ‘heir igh to property, their right to entrect, the right to The Pursuit of Happiness and the ‘enjoyment of ifs, They have admitted and ngreed that they have violated the Claimant's constitutional and common law rights, that they had intentionally, knowingly and delibretely filed to perform as ngreed have forsook thei obligatory duty of are and thus created a disputo that equines a resolution by SITCOMM ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION (Hercinfter“SAA") andor any subsequent award and 8. The paris stipulated and agreed thatthe related matters including any judgmonts associated thereto, any claims, and any collateral attacks by the Respondent) are ml and wid of ‘ny effect and shall not be binding onthe Claimant retrostively and henceforth; and 10. "The contract tated that punitive damages canbe optionally assesed, however: the contract remains silent as to any case that would direct the Arbitrator to direct «formula to Aetermine punitive damages. Tis deemed tha punitive damages may be warranted ifthe Respondents) donot voluntarily comply with cis award, In such an event, this Arbitrator may impose punitive damages at a rato of three times the amount ofthe actual damages in addition to thor romedios awarded? 11, The partes did have a prior relationship and the Respondent) had an obligation to spond tothe reasonable requests of the Claimant, One of those requests bung thatthe Respondent) provide an accounting and that such acounting be truthful and eerie as being ‘holly accurate, As the custodian of record, a position for which the Respondent) valunteerd, accepted such respons ‘nd have yot to rebut such a presumption, This Arbitrator finds that Pe Ma wc Capoy wi 4908190, SITCOM ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION age 24 ‘SAA: HOHA-T9KDBNQ-TQRNCF2LX-5896 ABLOA-PH-001 they were duty bound and have breachod thir fiduciary duty fear, supporting their willful and intentional as well deliberate dealt reepeting the irevocube binding contractual agreement that in coupled with interest: and 12, urther, this Arbitrator finds thatthe contractual agroomentdoos highlight and note « settlement offer whereby the parties stipulate within th body and framework of the agreement (Contract”“Agreement’ inline with Uhe Tucker Act and have agreed to certain and specific terme Under und in ine withthe contractual axrooment: and 18, There iscompletedivemity of citizenship between the parties’ and M4, Theamount in controversy exceeds the sum of $75,000.00, exshsiv of intarst, cost, feos and assessments: and 15, That the venue is proper in aay cour of orginal urslition wherein either the Arbitrator resides or chosen by the imant as stipulated in the contractual agreement and that ‘any orders compeling witness attendance, provisional remedies, equitable roi, interim awards are ‘tobe issued and enforced according tothe terms of the contract ax stipulated in the agreement and 16, That the parties havo agroed that all pre-existing as wel as exating contractual ‘Agreements between the parties, no matter ther scope, subject matter, andor detail are superseded and extinguished by the contractual agreement roferenced and related hereto: and 17, Should the Claimant clot that jurisdiction forthe final award may be hed under the Tucker ‘Actin the United States Court of Federal claims a the exclusive jurisdiction for said Court of| (Claims for damages against the United States under contract in exces of $10,000,00. Since this ‘matter is against an institution registored and licensed withthe United States, during the time ofits cont is construed as one and the same a8 a matter of law: the Federal Court of Cams woul be atthe eleston ofthe Claimant, «chosen proper jurisdiction to have the matior determined under common law andor aa stipulated inthe contrat at any cour of orginal jurisdiction. ‘BASIS FOR ARBITRATION: 18 Onr about 12/27/18, The Claimant and the Respondent) entered into a written, self executing, binding, irevoesle, contractual agreoment coupled with interests, for the complete ‘eslution of thei misconvitins and other conflict respecting their previous relationship The Respondents) made an attempt to change the tems of that contractual agreement and th Claimant presented a counter offeror conditional aceptance of the offer othe Respondent. The rocord clearly documents that the Respondent) have failed to propery respond after they received the ‘counteroffer, whereby such nonresponse would eguate to tacit acquiescence there ereting an estoppel reapecting the Respondent) and any future claims andlor prior claims andlor present Claims associated with this instant matter. 19, Tt appoars that a dispute has arisen under the agreement between the parties and it SETCONM ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION Pag S021 ‘SAA: HOHA*T9KDBNQ-TQRNCF2LX-5896 ABLOA-PH-001 the subject matter at bar. The Claimant contends that after agreeing to the terms ofthe contract the Respondents) have failed to fully perform to the terms of the agroement and that che Claimant is entitled to immediate and unconditional remedy as proscribed within the terms ofthe contractual ‘yroement, The Claimant has demanded lguidation ofthe estateftrust and the Respondent) have failed to act. 20, ‘The contractual agreement stipulates that the Arbitrator may adjust the amount of the ward to include fees, adjustments, cost and other expenses 21, "The cntractual agreement provided for arbitration of disputes at SITCOMM, ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION, which stated in relevant part: ‘Tha the arbitration proces is binding onal partion edi tho sole and exclusive remedy for redening any ame asocated with this agreoment. That this agreoment supersedes and predates ‘aswell as replaces any and all prior agreements between the partie, and is binding on all parios ‘and irrevocable, and the parton agroed tothe terms and conditions ofthis agreement upon default of ‘ho defaulting party as ofthe date ofthe default... ARBITRATION: AN ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDY COGNIZABLIE AT’ COMMON-LAW 22, ADDITIONALLY, itis exigont and of consequence for the Claimant to inform Respondent), in acordance wth and pursuant to the prinsples and doctrines of sean hands" and "sood faith ‘that by Respondent failure andlor refusal to respond and provide the requeto and necessary Proof ot Claims it shall beheld and noted andl agred to by all parties, that a gonoral response, a unspecific response ora failure to respond with speifsitos and facts and conclusions of common lave, andor to provide the requested information and documentation that is necessary end in support ofthe agreement shall constitute x failure and a doliberate and intentional rofusel to respond and at «result thereby andor therein, expressing the defaulting party's consent and agrecment said facts and asa result ofthe selPexecuting agreement, the fllowing is contingent upon their failure to respond in god faith, with specificity, with fete and conclusions of common-law to each an eve sverment, condition, andr claim raised: as they operate in favor of the Claimant, through “tacit oquiescene,” Respondent(a) NOT ONLY exprosely affirm che truth and validity of said facts set, ‘tablished, and agrood upon between the partis tothe Conditional Aecptance for Value and counter fferflaim for Proof of Claim and Respondent; have agreed and consented to Respondent) having a duty and obligation to provide the requested and necessary Proof of Claims ‘hich willereate and establish for Respondent) an estoppel in js matter), and ALL matters relating hereto: and arising necessarily therefrom: and, 28, In acordance with and pursuant to this agreement a contractually Gonsensual) binding ‘agreement between the partes tothe Conditional Acceptance for Value and counter offerll for Proof of Claim to include the corporate Government Agensy/Department constructs) whom Respondent(s) representsiservsi as wel as, ALL officers, agents, employees, assigns, and the lke in SITCONM ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION age 6of21 SAA: HOHA“T9KDBNQ-TQRNCP2LX-5896 AB10A-PH-O01 service to Respondents wll not argue, controver, oppo, o otherwise protest ANY af the facta already agreed upon by the parties set and established herein’ and necessarily and of consequence ‘sing thereftom, in ANY fatureremeal proceeding(/actions, including binding arbitration and onfiemation of the award in the District Court of the United States at any competent court under ‘riginal jurisdiction, in accordance with the general principles of nowstatutory Arbitration, wherein ‘the Conditional Aceptane forthe ValuelAgreemenContract no, J: 16fslbwtghobS © constitutes ‘an agreement of all interested partios inthe evento «default and acceptance through ncofilure to respond when a roquest for summary disposition of any claims or particular issue may be reques and decide by the Arbitrator, whereas a designated Arbitrator was chosen at random, ‘ho is duly authorized, and inthe event of any physical or mental incapacity to act as Arbitrator, the (Claimant shall retain the authority to selest any neutral Arbitrators) that qualify pursuant to the ‘common law right o arbitration, asthe arbitration process isa private remedy decided upon betwen the partis and with respect to this contractual agreement: the dfiulting party waives any snd al rghts, services, notices and consents to the Claimant and or the Claimant's representative selection ofthe Arbitrator thereby constituting agreement and any controversy or claim arising out ‘for relating in any way to this Agreement or with regard tit formation, interpretation or breach, ‘and any iaues of substantive or progualarbitrabilty shall bo setled by arbitration, and the Arbitrator may hear and decide the controversy upon evidence produced although a party who was uly notified ofthe arbitration proceeding did not appear: thatthe Claimant deems necessary to ‘nfare the “good faith” of ALL parties hereto within without respect to venue, jurisdiction, lew, and forum the Claimant dooms appropriate, “An arbitrator's award shoul not be vacated for erurs of Jw and fact committed by the arbitrator andthe courts should nt attempt to mold the award to conform to their sens of justice. 24, Further, Respondent(s) agree thet the Claimant can secure damages va financial Hien on ‘ssc, propertios held by them or on ther behalf for ALL injuries sustained and inflicted upon the ‘Claimant forthe moral wrongs committed against the Claimant as sot, established, agreed and consented to herein by the parties hereto, oinlude but not limited to: constitutional impermissible ‘uisapplication of sintute(a)law( inthe above referenced alleged Commercia\CivilCause rau, conspiracy (oo or more involved trespa tle, property, and the ik’ and, ALL other known ‘nd unknown trespasces and moral wrongs committed through ultra vires at) of ALL involved herein: whether hy commission or omission, Final amount of damages to be cleulated prior to submission of Tort Claim andlor the filing of lien and the porfction ofa security intron vn & Uniform Commercial Code Financing One (0) Statement: estimate in excess of TEN (10) Million ‘dollars (USD or other lawful money or curreney generally accepted with or by the financial markets or Gc oman 10 ABS 16, A NYSBS D201), SITCONM ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION age 70f21 ‘SAA: HOHA“T9KDBNQ-TQRNCF2LX-5896 |ABLOA-PH-001 ‘in America and notice to Respondent) by invoice, Per Respondent) failure andor refusal to provide the requested and necessary Proof of Claime and thereby: and thersin consenting and ‘agrocng to ALL the fets st, established, and agreed upon between the partes hereto, shall constitute a selexecuting binding irrevoable durable general power of attorney coupled with interests. This Conditional Aeeptance for Value and counter offerclaim for Prot of Claim bocomes ‘he security agreement under commercial law whereby only the nodefaulting party becomes the secured party, the holder in due course, the crditr in and at commerce. Is deemed and shall slays and forever be held thatthe Claimant and all property, interest, asses, estates, trusts ‘commercial or otherwise shall be deemed consume and household goods not-for profit and ego, private property, end exempt, ot for commercial use, nontaxable as defined bythe Uniform ‘Commercial Code Article §102 and Article 9 §109 and shall not in any point andor manner, past, present andlor fature be construed otherwise see the Uniform Commercial Cade Articles 8, 8, and 9 25, Reepondent have allowed the ten (10) Calendar days or twenty (20) Calendar days total i request was made by aged writen application fr the adiitonal tn (10) Calendar daye to elapse ‘without proving the requested and necessary Proof of Claims for which Respondent) have entored {nto faut andthe Claimant has teansmitted a Notice of Fault and Opportunity to Cure and Contast ‘Acceptance to the Respondent wherein Respondent wero givon an additonal thre (8) days (72 hour) to cure Respondent(s) ful Respondent) filed o otherwise refused to cure Respondents) fault and Respondent) are found in default and thereby: and therein, Respondent) have ‘stablished Respondent) consent and agreement tothe fats contained within the Conditional ‘Acceptance for Value and counter offer for Proof of Claim as sid facta operat in favor ofthe Claimant: ex, thatthe judgment of alleged “bout of recon” within the hove rferenesd alleged (CommerciaVCvilCause is VOD AB INITIO for want of subject mater jurisdiction of said venuet insufficient document (Information) and afidavits in suppor thereof for want of establishing a claim of debt want of Relationship with the “source of authority" for said statutelaVlawl) for want of privity of contract, r contract itself improperly identified parties to said judgment, as well as sid Aisputelmatter and, 26, Respondent) agreed and consented that Respondents) do have a duty and obligation to Claimant as well as the corporate Government Department/agencyconstrut() Respondent) reprecentlerves, a corroct the recordin the alleged CommerciaUCivivCause and thereby: and ‘heroin, release the indenture (however termed/tyled) upon the Claimant and eause the Claimant to be restored to liberty and release the Claimants property rights, ax well ae ALL property held under storage contract in the “name ofthe alapitaHTetior “name defendant within the alleged CCommerciaCiviiCause within th leged commercially “bonded” warehousing ageney dra, for the ‘commercial eorporate Government construct db. the United States, That this arbitration awaed is ‘tobe construed conteatually and not otherwise and that if any portion andor prov SITCOMM ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION Page 0f21 SAA: HOHA-T9KDBNQ-TQRNCP2LX-5896 ABLOA-PH-OOL within this arbitration award, the self exceuting binding irrevocable contractual agreement coupled ‘with intrest: is deemed non-binding hitration it shall in no way affect any other portion of t ‘ward. Tht this Arbitrator is permitted and ellowed to adjust the arbitration awand to no les than two times the orginal value ofthe properties associated with this ngreement, plus the addition of| fines, penalties, and other assessments that are deemed reasonable to the Arbitrator upon presentment of such claim, supported by prima facie evidence of the claim. 27, The defaulting party willbe estopped from maintaining or enforcing the original “lferipresentment i, the above referenced alleged CommercialCivifCause as wll as ALL, ‘commercial paper (nogotiable instruments) therein, within any court or administrative tibunalanit within any venue, jurisdiction, and forum the Claimant may deem appropriate to proceed within in the event of ANY and ALL breach() af this contractual agreement by Respondent(s) to compel specific performance and or damages arising from injures therefrom. The deflkng party will be ‘oeclosed by laches andor estoppel fom maintaining or enforcing the orignal offerfpresontment in ‘any mode or manner whatsoever, at any time, within any proceedingaction 28, Furthermore, the Respondent) are foreclosed against the enforcement, retaliation, assault, ‘nfingement, imprisonment, trespass upon the rights, properties, estate, person whether le natural or otherwise ofthe presontr/petitioner andor hs interest andlor his estate retroactively, at present, pst-actively, forever undor any circumstances, guise, andor presumption ‘NOTICE OF COMMON-LAW ARBITRATION: 28. Please be advised that inasmuch a the C1 fn the “name” ofthe allapitaPtetter “named” defendant ab employed/used upon the face: and within, ALL, \documents/instruments/ocords within the alleged Commercial/CivilCaus, to inchude any and all derivatives and variations in tho spelling of eaid “name” except the "true name" of the Iimant, ‘through a Common-Law Copyright, led for record within the Office af the Seervtary of State and having “perfected sid interes in same through incorporation within a Financing (and all amendments and transcending flings thereto), by reference therein, the Claimant hereby and herein, waives the Claimant's rights a et, established and the ike therein, ands “perfected” within sid Financing Statomentatingloperting to “vgite” said Copyright, o allow for the Respondent) to enter the record ofthe allege “court of recor within the alleged CommersialCivilCause forthe SOLE purpose to coreet said reer’ and comply with Respandente) ‘rood upon duty/bligntion to write the “order” and eause same tobe transmitted to restore and relesse the Claimant, the Claimants corpus and ALL property currently under a storage contract” under the inimant’s Common-Law Copyrighted tradernamet i. the allcapital letter “named” ‘defendant within the above referenced allege CommeriallCivil Caso, within the alleged ‘commercially “bonded” warehousing agency dba, the commercial corporate Government juridical SITCOMM ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION Page 9021 SAA: HOHA“T9KDBNQ-TQRNCF2LX-5896 ABLOA-PH-OOL construct dba. the United States, Please take special note, thatthe copyright is wth reference to the name and its diret association andor correlation tothe presenter. 30, NOTIOR: The Arbitrators, "Must not necessarily judge according to the strict aw but a a seneral rule ought chiefyto consider the principles of practical businoss"* + "Internationally accepted principles of law governing contractual relations. Ifthe contract (valid o otherwise) contains an arbitration clause, then the proper forum to determine whether the contract i void or not, is tho arbitration tribunal + That any determination by the Arbitrator is binding upon al parties, and that al partios ‘agree to abide by the decision of the Arbitrator. The Arbitrator isto render a decision sed ‘upon the facts and conclusions as presented within the terms and condition of the contrat. ‘Any default by any party must be supported by proof and evidence of sid default that Aefuit shall serve as tacit acquiesce on behalf ofthe party who defaulted as having ssreed tothe terme and conditions ustociated with the selFexocuting binding irevocuble contract coupled with interests. Tht the Arbitrator i prohibited from considering andor relying on statutory law, as it has boon held that aay time any party relies on or enforees a statute, they possess no judicial power. "Aju ceases to set as a judicial officer beeause the governing principals of administrative law provides that courts ar prohibited from substituting their evidence, testimony, record, ‘nguments and rationale for that of the agency. Additionally, courts are prohibited from their substituting their judgments for that ofthe agency.” "luges who become involved in enforcement af mere statutes (civil or eriminel in nature and otherwise), act as mere “elerks" ofthe involved agency." + “Their suppoced ‘sour’ becoming thus a court of limited jurisdiction’ sere extension of "he involved agency for mere superior reviewing purposes.”> "When acting to enforce a statute, the judge ofthe municipal courts acting an administrative officer and not as 8 merely administeraly, + inbe icin capaity courts in administrating or enforcing statutes do not act judicially. but, in our law that an edministrative agency may act only within the erea of jurisdiction marked out frit by law. Ian individual doesnot come within the coveraue of the particular agency's enabling logialtion the agency is without power to take any ation hich affets him." {Mae es ee Gina m0 26 pst 1 5 ow rasa 1 AC 8 vc AMIN LAW Ch, (1 Wes 18 "RC Deis ADMIN LAW 5 (CTF Ska Way FP PRC WG 28108 4 ale F261 U8. 1pm ae seh, ao SITCOMM ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION ag 10021 SAA: HOHA-T9KDBN@-TQRNCF2LX-5896 ‘AB10A-PH-O01 "Tee not every act, legislative in form, thats law. Law is something more than mere will be exerted as an act of power..Avbiteary power, enforcing its edicts tothe injury ofthe person and property oft subjects is not aw.” # Some ofthe aforementioned cases are nt published, however these are sil fundamental Principles of law, and one ofthe fundamental principles of arbitration is that the Arbitrator site as judge over the facts, and as such to prosorve the sanctity ofthe process and Arbitrator reeves tho same immunity a8 judge snd is exempt fom prosecution and or review unless ‘they ean be proved thatthe Arbitrator intentionally ignored the evidence and acted in conspiracy to defraud the parties, 81, Asthe Claimant has no desire NOR wish to tie the hands of Respanden(a)in performing Respondent) agreed upon dutylbligation as se, established, and agreed upon within thi Conditional Aceptanc for Value and counter oferlelaim for Proof Claim and thereby eeatlenuse “broach” of snd contractually binding agreement on the part ofthe Respondent, Respondent) i hereby: and herein, NOTICED that if tia waiver of said Copyright isnot liberal, NOR extensive ‘ough, tallow forthe Respondent) to specially perform all dutieslobigntons asst, ‘stablished, and agreed upon within the Conditional Acceptance for Value and countor fferlaim for Proof of Claim: Respondent(s) mayiin “god fit and NOT in fraud ofthe Claimant, ake all nooded and required liberties wth sid Copyright and this waver in order to lil and accomplish Respondents) dutielbligations set, established, and ngreed upon between the parties to this 52, IfReapondent) has any question andar concerns regarding said Copyright andor the ‘waiver, Respondent) is invited to address such questions and ar concerns tothe Claimant in iting and causing said communiqués to be transmitted to the Claimant and below named Notary/Third Party. The respondents have acted a ifthe contract quas-or otherwise doesnot place ‘binding obligation upon their persons, upon ther organizations, upon their institutions, upon thet job qualifications and breaching that obligation bresches the contrac, for which they cannot address Aue to the direct confit of interest. is as a result ofthat confit of intorest that binding snbitration shall be instituted, 38. Your failure to respond, and this would include each of the Respondents) by theie "representative and if represented bythe Attorney General, mich presentation must bo responsive for each State andlor Stato organiaatio/departmentageney, separately and severally to each ofthe Points of averment,fuilure to respond to a single point of averment will constitute aequiosconce, forfitare, anda waiver ofl sights with remoct al ofthe point raised inthis presentment 94, Pursuant tothe terms ofthe contratal agreement the Claimant has provided proof that ra Cape (8) URIS OM) SITCOMNE ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION Page 121 SAA: HOHA-TSKDBNQ-TQRNCP2LX-5896 |A510A-PH-002 ‘hey have attempted to communicate with the Respondent) for compliance of the sontzactual ‘agreement and have exhausted the requirements of tho contractual agreement in that regard 35. "The Respondent(s) have agreed and consented to binding arbitration under the terms ofthe contractual agreement and have waived al rights to vacate, modify, appeal, contest, or collaterally attack the decison, rulings, orders, remedies, andor award (bath interim and fina of hin Arbitrator. ‘THE FEDERAL ARBITRATION ACT Application: 386, Pursuant to the contractual agreements arbitration clause, the agreement evidences a ‘transaction involving or affecting “commerce,” within the meaning of Article 9 United States Code Subseetion 1, and thatthe cts attributable to th claimant's in the underlying associated ‘matterweauselactions are ascocated with the use ofinstrumentalitos 8 described in the foreign soverign immunities ator otherwise feted “somsmerc among the several states within the ‘eaning ofthe statute and Article 9 United States Code § St. DUBTOTHE FACT THAT THE CONTRACTUAL AGREEMENT IS A BINDING IRREVOCABLE CONTRACT WHICH AFFECTS “COMMERCE,” THE ARBITRATION PROVISIONS CONTAINED WITHIN IT ARE “VALID, IRREVOCABLE AND ENFORCEABLE WITHIN THE MEANING OF 9 UNITED STATHSS CODE SUBSECTION 2. 38, Valid, revocable and Rnforesble" arbitration agreements and the onder, rings, ‘ecsions, remedies, end award made therefom may be enforced in the United States courts by way of confirmation and entry ofa judgment ofthe court within the meaning of the statute and Article 9 United Statos Codes § 9 and §18, The suprome court has explained, “(here is nothing malleable bout ust grant which unequivocally tells court to grant confirmation in all eas, except when one ofthe ‘preseribed! exceptions applic”! Confirmation ofan award is generally a “summary proceeding that merely makes what is already a final arbitration eward a judgment ofthe court.” 39, _Tewas held by the supreme court that “he wholly groundless" exception to itrabilty is inconsistent with the federal arbitration aet and this court's precedent. Under the act, arbitration is « mattor of contract, and courts must enforce arbitration contracts acoring to their terms The partes to auch a contract may agroo to have an arbitrator decide not only the merits of 4 particular dispute, but also “gateway” questions of'arbitrabilty.” Therefore, when the parti ‘contract delegates the arbitrailty question to an arbitrator, court may not overide the contrat, even ifthe court thinks that che arbitrabilty elsim is wholly groundlesa"!™ PROCEDURES ON ARBITRATION PROCEEDINGS: Hane Ha eer rma ere a Ir ReweConeWe ac, 38 US 0 SITCOMM ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION Page 202 ‘SAA: HOHAT9KDBNQ-TQRNCF2LX-5896 -ABIOA-PH-001 40. ‘The Claimant is woking equitable relict and monetary damage rele from the Respondent snd that the parties have agreed that arbitration proceedings shouldbe bifurcated into separate ‘hess: Phase One (1) should address the claims for monetary damages and Phase ‘Two (2) should audress the claims for equitable rei 41 Thepa hhave stipulated that any courtf original jurisdiction may enforce the ‘provisions of Phase Two 2) equitable relief awarded by the Arbitrator, 42. The Arbitrator sall have the exclusive jursdition forthe enforcement of any and all ‘matters associated with Phase One (1) monetary damage relict 49, Due to time constraints and the paramount danger alfoctng the public intores, justice, and due proces the parties consented and applied for the arbitration proceedings to commence without day 44, its sto claims (due tothe extansive nature ofthe claims, each ofthe claims by the (Claimant is incorporated herein by reference) © The record shall roflet and note that the Claimant wattached n opy ofthe original ‘ontract which ls all the claims within the form of stipulation, thatthe parties have al agreed to, ™ ich of thove claims by reference. This Arbitrator finds that such that they have incorporated incorporation is appropriate and accepts that incorporation as matter of record, 1D Asnoted above, the Claimant has alge thatthe Respondent(s) have breached the contractual agreement and because the agreement i binding on all partes and was irevocabe: the Respondents) have acted in ba faith, with unclean hands, and have breached thir fiduciary duty of ‘are, responsibilities and are liable tothe laimant forthe amount ofthe contractual agreement, plus ndditional costs, fos, assossments, penalties, and other equitable relief romedies, (© That the Respondent have agred to discontinue all use ofthe Claimant's Personal information, assets, properties, within its publication, its databases its system of record cords associated with this matter to the Claimant and heve ‘oping, and to have surrendered al failed todo a agreed ‘That the Respondent) have agreed to compensate the Claimant for ther gross Inisepresentaton of facts and other information pertinent tothe welfare and welling of the Claimant, Respondent) have failed to provide such compensation as agreed and have file to brovde any documentation which would substantiate thir having complied with thi rquizement of ‘the contractual agreement. ‘That the Claimant has agreed and accepted th fact thatthe United States has ‘leclarod a national banking emergency which is supported by the “EMERGENCY ECONOMIC BANKING RELIEF ACT,"“PROCLAMATION 2038, 2088, and 2040, and the ‘NATIONAL. EMERGENCIES ACT.” which resulted in the suspension of all normal banking activities and have SITCOMM ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION Page 13 021 SAA: HOHA-T9KDBNQ:TQRNCF2LX-5896 ABLOA-PH-001 greed that any claim of debt bythe Respondent) is fraudulent, and shat they wilfully attempted snd committed fraud against the Claimant. 15 That the Respondent) have agreed that THE NATIONAL BANKING HOLIDAY ‘permits them to issue what’s known as emergency arnt as prescribed bythe March 9, 1933 Act (the reference notes of Congres lento this conclusion), have agrood to isu book keeping entry credit andor tnx credits to the Claimant in the amount af the init Claim and owe Claimant as much a3 troblo damages associated with the inital enim. [The Respondent) have further agreed to turn over any and all properties, assets, securities, documents, accounting records tothe claimants upon demandefault and have filed andlor refused to do s, thus putting them in further breach in violation ofthe contractual agroment,entiting the Claimant to equitable reli. "The findings and determination of THIS ARBITRATOR: 45, This the determination ofthis Arbitrator tha the following are facts that are undisputed and uncontroverte 8. That thereis« binding imevocable contractual agrooment that has been coupled with Intorosts that exist between the partes. b, That the parties had a pre-established relationship which placed an obligation on cach to communicate withthe other © "That the Respondents) have made changes othe original agreement which permitted and allowed the Claimant to present a counter ofer andr conditional acceptance ofthe cfr to change the agreement to the Respondent. That the selFeneuting binding contract coupled with introns stands as irrevocble. © That the Respondent) have agreed tothe contract, good to al the terms nnd ‘conditions of the contract by their acceptenco ofthe waiver which was included as part ofthe contractual agreement that waiver being the right not to respond as highlighted hy the Supreme Court ofthe United States 46. “Due process requires, ata minimums that an individual be given meaningfal ‘opportunity to be heard prior to being subjected by force of law to significant deprivation... That ‘ho hearing required by du process is ubjes o waiver and isnot fixed in form doesnot ae its oot requirement that an individual be given an opportunity fora heating before he is deprived of any signif property interest. 0 47, "Inthe latter ease'* we sai thatthe right tobe hesrd ‘has litle reality or worth unless one is informed thatthe matter is ponding and can choose for himself whether to appear or default, acquiesce or contest.» The Respondent) have filed to provide proof that they have not recaved ‘cpl, C6 $5, SITCOMM ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION Page Mor SAA: HOHA-TSKDBNQ-TQRNCF2LX-5896 |ABLOA-PHL-001 ‘snd bon notified ofthe existence ofthe contract and of their right to waiver 48 Tho Respondent) failure to respond constituted an ae of tacit aoquiescenea.” 49. Respondent have filed andor refused to respond and provide the requested and necessary Proof of Claims as requested by the Claimant. Therefor, it shall he held, noted and ‘greed to by al the partos thet a general response, «nonspecific response, o sure to respond ‘with specificities and facts and conclusions of common law anor to provide the requested information and documentation that is necessary and in support ofthe agreement shall constitute a failure and deliberate and intentional refuel to respond and asa result thereby andor therein, ‘expressing the defaulting partys consent and agreement to said facts and asa result of the sel: executing agreement, the following is contingent upon their failure to respond in good faith, with pecfcty, with facts and conclusions of common-law to each and every avermont, condition, andlor claim raised as they operate in favor ofthe Claimant, through "tacit acquiescence” Respondent) NOT ONLY expresly affirm the truth and validity of sid facts set, established, and agreed upon between the parties tothe Conditional Ancptance for Value and counter offerelaim for Proof of ‘Claim, but also Respondent) have agred and consented to Respondent) having a duty and ligation to provide the requested and necessary Prot of Claims which wil erate and esteblish for Respondent) an estoppel inthis matter), and ALL matters relating roto and arising necessarily therefom..nd 50. Respondent) have waived all right, claims, defenses, andlor sanding respcoting the ‘matter an is estopped from any collateral attacks andioesecking deposition fom any ther venue result ofthe knowing, intentional Aeliberate consent to the contractual agreement. 1. find thatthe Claimant es well as the Respondent) are consenting adults, having stained the age of majority nota minor not an infant, nt a delinquent, andor a decedent All parties are fully capable of entering into and negotiating contracts. 2 donot find any ofthe parties to be aufering from a mental disease andlor defst that ‘would have provented andor interfered with their knowing ad intentional entering int the binding contractual agreement: and 8 find that the contractual agreement is binding on all parties, remains ivevocable and thatthe contractual agreement remains in effect aa stipulated within the agreement until all ‘he obligations are satisfied by the defaulting party. As of this day, those obligations have not been satistied and I hereby order the Respondent(s) to satisy the obligations according to the terms of the contractual agreement, which is not inconsistent with this order; and 4, [find thatthe Respondent has failed to fully perform to the terms ofthe agzecment and ‘hat the Claimant is entitled to immediate and unconditional remedy as prescribed within SITCOMM ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION age 15021 ‘SAA: HOHA-T9KDBNQ-TQRNCF2LX-5896 -AS10A-PH-001 ‘he terms ofthe contractual agreement and make the injured party (the claimant) whole ‘gun by complying with the terms of contract othe let. 5. 1nd thatthe Claimant has demanded Hguidation of the eattetrust and thatthe Respondent(s) have filed to act, The Claimant has also demanded a fll review and audit ‘comprehensive in nature’ of all revenue fr the estatatrust over the cours of the past ten (00) years, any tax credits andor deductions associated withthe estatfrust, a eopy ofthe insurance policies held, anda copy of any bonds held by the debtor, The Caimant leo ‘sctng the Creditor inthis matters has requested suc information to preserve their standing an position, 6 Theagrooment stipulates thatthe Arbitrator may adjust the amount of the award to Include fees, adjustment, costs, and other expenses 7. This award is final and binding upon issuance and exceuton ofthe arbitrators signature below and takes ful force and effet immediatly upon issuance. 8. [find the Claimant's award to be 0.00 U.S, Dollars in tal per Respondent(s) for flare to state a claim in which reli can be granted. An award cannot be granted at this time because ‘Hach Claimant's payment covers themselves and a spouse, any ether Claimants have to pay a separate fee, . Aprior relationship has not been proven oF established between the parties, ‘Arbitration i a private common law remedy no statutory law an bo included into these proceedings. 4 1find that Donald Trump is nt responsible for an award because the Claimant filed to stato claim in which elie ean be granted. [find that Job Roberts J. snot responsible fr an award because the Claimant failed to state claim in which rele xn bo granted 4. [find that Nancy Pelosi is not responsible for an award cause the Claimant filed to state a claim in which reli can be granted, 8. Tfind that Wiliam Barr isnot responsible fran award because the Claimant filed to stato claim in which reli can be granted 1. find thet the United States of Americ snot responsible for an award because the (Claimant filed to state a claim in which reli canbe granted, 4, [find that Charles Grassley is not responsible for an award because the Claimant failed to stato claim in which oie ean be granted 51, The Supreme Court has explained, “thar ia nothing malleable about ‘must grant? SFTCOMM ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION Page 6021 SAA: HOHA-T9KDBNQ-TQRNCF2LX-5896 ABLOA-PH-O01 ‘hich unequivocally tells court to grant confirmation in all eases, except when one ofthe ‘proscribed exceptions apple”! A Judicial review of an arbitrators award is extremely limited, ‘and the court must accept the arbitrator’ erediility detsrminations, even where there is conflicting ‘evidence and room for choice exista:* “An arbitrator's award should not be vacated for errors of law ‘and fact committed by the arbitrator and the courts should not attempt to mold the award to ‘conform to their sense of justice 52, This order shall bo binding on all the partie, in all jurisdictions, and shall take ‘precedent over al collateral andor related matters herstofore, at present and forthwith until the ‘agreement is fully satisfied. The Respondent(s) are estopped from maintaining andor bringing arth any action against the Claimant, the Claimant's heirs, andor the Claimant's properties tly. This order shall constitute permanent injunction against the Respondent(s) respecting the Claimant's andthe Claimant's interst comprised and embodied within the contractual agreement, 59. ‘The Respondent) ere herehy ordered to release the demandod information ofthe (Claimant which includes a fll review and audit ofall venus fr tho ostatfrust over the p (0) years, any tax eredite and/or deductions associated withthe estateftrust, a copy of any insurance Policies associated withthe extatftrast and a copy of any bods held in espe othe eatatelteunt "The purpone ofthis information shall be fr the Claimant to liquidate any and all assets ofthe statoftrust and 54, The Respondont() are hereby ordered to release any and all lame against any and all Droperties ofthe Claimant’ to return any and all properties held in any manner, to inelude records, Aocuments, audiotape, discoveries, exculpetory or otherwise, and that ths ordn/mandate shall nat be construed other than its intent and its contextual rendering, 55, Accordingly, Justice Kavanaugh ofthe Supreme Court expressed his opinion as "We ‘must interpret the Actas writton, andthe Actin turn requires that we interpre the contract as ritton. When the partie’ contract delegates the arbitrailty question to an arbitrator, a court may not override the contract. Tn thos circumstances, a court possesses no pow to decide the sarbitrability issue, That is rue oven ifthe court chinks thatthe ergument thet the arbitration ‘agreement applies toa particular dispute is wholly groundless." 58. Farther, Kavanaugh continued: “That conclusion follows not ony from the tex ofthe Act but ‘als fom proven. We have held tht @ court may nt “ru onthe potontal merits af the “underlying” claim thats assigned by contract to an arbitrator, “even iit appoara tothe cour wo be frivolous A court has “no busines weighing the merits of the grievance” because the “agreement a cL an 5 U6 88 20, Maer f on rei fot nbc Carp 7 ADAG 49 NYS 195d D208, ie ‘sree Sa Dist Hon i, ADM 8 8930 ue, "Slo ee hae 10 ADR 4 NYS ep 3 ‘heey he ea ler he Sa he 9 "414 vhs Commas Hk 0S 8, 69-690 (98). SITCOMM ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION ag 17921 ‘SAA: HOHA-T9KDBNQ-TQRNCF2LX-5896 ‘AB1OA-PH-001 isto submitall grievances to aritation, not merely those which the court will deem mesitorous“® ATIT Technologies principle applies with equa force othe threshold issue of arbiteabiliy, Just as court may not decides merits question tha the parties have delegated oan exbitratr, a court may not decide an atbitrability question that the parties have dolgatod to an arbitrator. ‘This award i ennsstont with the following! 57, GUS. Code § 572 - General authority (@) An ageney may ws a dispute resolution proceeding fr the reaction of an isu in controversy that relates to an administrative program, ithe partes agroo to such proceeding. (An agency shal consider not using dispute resolution proceeding it (A definitive or authoritative resolution ofthe matters required for precedential value and such 1 proceeding isnot likely to be accepted generally as an authoritative procdent: (2) The matter involves or may bear upon significant questions af Government policy that require ‘Additional procedures before a final resolution may he made, and such a proceeding would not likely serve to develop «recommended policy fr the agency: (9) Maintaining established policies is of special importance, eo that variations ainong individual Aecisons are not inereased and such a proceeding would not likely reach onsistent results among. individual decisions: (0 The matter significantly affects porsons or onpunizations who are not parties to the proceeding (6) A ful pubic record ofthe proseeding is important, and a dispute resolution proceeding cannot provide such a reorand (6) The agency must maintain continuing jurisdiction over the mattce with authority t alter the Aisposition of the matter in the light of changed circumstances, and a dispute resolution proceeding ‘would intorfore withthe agency's uli i that requirement (2) Alternative means of dispute resolution authorized under this subchapter ar voluntary ‘rocedures which supplement rather than limit other availabe ageney dispute resolution techniques? 58, The Claimant and Respondent have agreed tha this privat contractial agreement ‘involving private parti has no bearing onthe public endfor the SITCOMM ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION'S policies andr procedures, and that the award is consistent with the terme ofthe ‘agreement and the general rincipls of arbitration that have been delineated through the annuals a ‘58, That the contractual agreement betwoon the parties was specific tothe partes only and did ot involve any’ nonrelated party andlor entity, dove not affect government andor its abilities to ‘amy out ite functions, polices, andlor procedures. Tha the parties saw arbitration a an alternative 2 Suche mer Me Ca OU 8. $6,568 (96 ee Pub F-53 4 1, 1, 1S 2, 0; mba 572 Pk 12-8, $2040} Ane 2,199,106 SITCOM ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION Page 8021 SAA: HOHA-T9KDBNQ-TQRNCF2LX-5896 |ABLOA-PH-002 remedy andl agree to tho altomative remedy within the construct ofthe binding irevoceble contractual agreement that remains coupled with interest, (60, That the term andlor phrase agency as defined bythe statute doesnot apply to the parties and ther private contractual matters, -()"ayeney" means each authority ofthe Government ofthe ‘United States, whether o not itis within or aubjet to review by ancther agency, but doesnot inchade— (A the Congress (B) the cours ofthe United States: () the governments ofthe trritries or possessions of the United States (D) the government ofthe District f Columbia (E) agencies ‘composed of representatives ofthe parties or of representatives of organizations ofthe parties tothe

    You might also like