Professional Documents
Culture Documents
MBA
MBA
Wealth tax is imposed on the richer section of the society. The intention of doing so is to bring
parity amongst the taxpayers. However, wealth tax was abolished in the budget of 2015
(effective FY 2015-16) as the cost incurred for recovering taxes was more than the benefit is
derived. Abolishing the wealth tax also simplified the tax structure. As an alternative to the
wealth tax, the finance minister hiked the surcharge from 2% to 12% for the super rich section.
Individuals with an income of above Rs.1 crore and companies with an income of over Rs.10
crore fall under the ambit of the super-rich segment.
3. Charge on Wealth
If the total net wealth of an individual, HUF or company exceeds Rs. 30 lakhs, on the valuation
date, tax @1% will be leviable on the amount in excess of Rs. 30 lakhs. Every person whose
net wealth exceeds such limit shall furnish a return of net wealth. The due date is same as that of
Income tax return.
Total XXX
5. Components of Wealth
Assets: An asset is a resource which is held and has future
economic benefit
1. Any building or land appurtenant whether used for residential/ other purposes, but
doesn’t include:
(I) All the property of the amalgamating company or companies immediately before the
amalgamation becomes the property of the amalgamated company by virtue of the
amalgamation.
(II) All the liabilities of the amalgamating company or companies immediately before the
amalgamation becomes the liabilities of the amalgamated company by virtue of the
amalgamation.
(III) Shareholders holding at least three-fourths in value of the shares in the amalgamating
company or companies (other than shares already held therein immediately before the
amalgamated company or its nominee) becomes the shareholders of the amalgamated company
by virtue of the amalgamation.
If an amalgamation takes place within the meaning of section 2(1B) of the Income Tax Act,
1961, the following tax reliefs and benefits shall available:-
Exemption from Capital Gains Tax in case of International Restructuring [Sec. 47(via)]:
Under Section 47(via)} in case of amalgamation of foreign companies, transfer of shares held in
Indian company by amalgamating foreign company to amalgamated foreign company is exempt
from tax, if the following two conditions are satisfied:
At least twenty-five per cent of the shareholders of the amalgamating foreign company continue
to remain shareholders of the amalgamated foreign company, and
Such transfer does not attract tax on capital gains in the country, in which the amalgamating
company is incorporated
The transfer is made in consideration of the allotment to him of shares in the amalgamated
company; and
(a) a company owning an industrial undertaking (Note 1) or ship or a hotel with another
company, or
(b) a banking company referred in section 5(c) of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 with a
specified bank (Note 2), or
(c) one or more public sector company or companies engaged in the business of operation of
aircraft with one or more public sector company or companies engaged in similar business.
The term ‘Amalgamation’ or ‘Merger’ or ‘De-merger’ is not defined in the Companies Act,
1956. Chapter V of Part VI of Companies Act comprising sections 390 to 396A contain
provisions regarding Compromises, Arrangement and Reconstructions.
De-merger is undertaken basically for two reasons. The first as an exercise in corporate
restructuring and the second is to give effect to kind of family partitions in case of family owned
enterprises. A de-merger is also done to help each of the segments operate more smoothly, as
they can now focus on a more specific task.
1. Maruti Motors operating in India and Suzuki based in Japan amalgamated to form a new company called
Maruti Suzuki (India) Limited
2. DCM Ltd. demerged into DCM Ltd., DCM Shriram Industries Ltd., DCM Engineering Industries Ltd., and
Rath Foods Ltd.
1. AMALGAMATION/MERGER:
Accounting Standard 14 defines amalgamation as –
AS 14 provides for two types of amalgamation: “Amalgamation in the nature” of merger and
“Amalgamation in the nature of purchase”. Amalgamation in the nature of merger is an
amalgamation which satisfies all the following conditions.
(i) All the assets and liabilities of the transferor company become,
after amalgamation, the assets and liabilities of the transferee company.
(ii) Shareholders holding not less than 90% of the face value of the equity shares of the
transferor company (other than the equity shares already held therein, immediately before
the amalgamation, by the transferee company or its
subsidiaries or their nominees) become equity
shareholders of the transferee company by virtue of the amalgamation.
(iii) The consideration for the amalgamation receivable by those equity shareholders of the
transferor company who agree to become equity shareholders of the transferee company is
discharged by the transferee company wholly
by the issue of equity shares in the transferee company, except that cash may be paid in
respect of any fractional shares.
(v) No adjustment is intended to be made to the book values of the assets and liabilities of the
transferor company when they are incorporated in the financial statements of the
transferee company except to ensure uniformity of accounting policies.
“amalgamation“, in relation to companies, means the merger of one or more companies with
another company or the merger of two or more companies to form one company (the company or
companies which so merge being referred to as the amalgamating company or companies and the
company with which they merge or which is formed as a result of the merger, as the
amalgamated company) in such a manner that:
(i) All the property of the amalgamating company or companies immediately before the
amalgamation becomes the property of the amalgamated company by virtue of the
amalgamation;
(ii) All the liabilities of the amalgamating company or companies immediately before the
amalgamation become the liabilities of the amalgamated company by virtue of the
amalgamation;
(iii) Shareholders holding not less than 3three-fourths in value of the shares in the amalgamating
company or companies (other than shares already held therein immediately before the
amalgamation by, or by a nominee for, the amalgamated company or its subsidiary) become
shareholders of the amalgamated company by virtue of the amalgamation.
2. DEMERGER
Section 2(19AA) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 added by the Finance Act, 1999 provides that
“demerger” in relation to companies, means the transfer, pursuant to a scheme of arrangement
under sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 (1 of 1956), by a demerged company of
its one or more undertakings to any resulting company in such a manner that:
(i) All the property of the undertaking, being transferred by the demerged company, immediately
before the demerger, becomes the property of the resulting company by virtue of the demerger;
(ii) All the liabilities relatable to the undertaking, being transferred by the demerged company,
immediately before the demerger, become the liabilities of the resulting company by virtue of the
demerger;
(iii) The property and the liabilities of the undertaking or undertakings being transferred by the
demerged company are transferred at values appearing in its books of account immediately
before the demerger;
(iv) The resulting company issues, in consideration of the demerger, its shares to the
shareholders of the demerged company on a proportionate basis;
(v) The shareholders holding not less than three-fourths in value of the shares in the demerged
company (other than shares already held therein immediately before the demerger, or by a
nominee for, the resulting company or, its subsidiary) become share-holders of the resulting
company or companies by virtue of the demerger, otherwise than as a result of the acquisition of
the property or assets of the demerged company or any undertaking thereof by the resulting
company;
(vii) The demerger is in accordance with the conditions, if any, notified under sub-section (5) of
section 72A by the Central Government in this behalf.
In cases of demergers where only one of the many undertakings or part of an undertaking is
transferred as an exercise in corporate restructuring, the transferor company would continue to
exist to carry on its other businesses. However in case where all the undertakings of a business
are transferred to different transferee companies, there is no need for the transferor company to
exist and therefore it can be dissolved without winding up.
It may be noted that for the purpose of depreciation “Building” includes roads, bridges, culverts ,wells and
tubewells. Likewise, plant and machinery includes Typewriters, Photocopiers, Telex & Fax Machines,
Computers, Tools and Books (used by the professionals). Depreciation is allowed at prescribed
percentage, which varies between 5% to 100% for various blocks of assets on the written down value.
However, as per second proviso to section 32(1),depreciation shall be restricted to 50% of the prescribed
percentage in respect of such asset which is acquired by the assessee during the previous year and put
to use for the purpose of business or profession for a period of less than 180 days in that previous year.
Another important point is that the first proviso to section 32(1) , which provided for full deduction of the
actual cost of any machinery or plant costing upto Rs.5,000,has been omitted by the Finance Act , 1995
with effect from Assessment Year 1996 -97. However depreciation on professional books has been
allowed at the rate of 100% with effect from Assessment Year 1996-97.
CLAIMING 100% DEPRECIATION & REDUCING TAX LIABILITY :
Wind mills and other special devices including electric generators and pumps running on wind energy,
bio-gas plant, bio-gas engines, agricultural and municipal waste conversion devices producing energy
and electrically operated vehicles including battery powered or fuel-cell powered vehicles, solar power
generating systems etc., are some of the items included in machinery and plant which are eligible for
100% depreciation. An existing industry having considerable taxable profits may plan diversification in the
industries and can claim 100% depreciation in respect of the new plant and machinery. In the recent past
many companies have successfully done such tax planning, which is absolutely within the legal frame
work and in accordance with the Govt. policy to promote investments in certain sectors.
IS IT MANDATORY TO CLAIM DEPRECIATION OR IS TAX PLANNING POSSIBLE BY DEFERRING
THE CLAIM ?
In the case of - CIT v. Mahendra Mills and ors. [2000] 243 ITR 56 (SC). Supreme court has held that
the provision for claim of depreciation is for the benefit of the assessee. If he does not wish to avail of
that benefit for some reason, the benefit cannot be forced upon him. It is for the assessee to see if the
claim of depreciation is to his advantage. Income under the head ' Profits and gains of business or
profession' is chargeable to income-tax under section 28 and income under section 29 is to be computed
in accordance with the provisions contained in sections 30 to 43A. The argument that since section 32
provides for depreciation it has to be allowed in computing the income of the assessee cannot in all
circumstances be accepted in view of the bar contained in section 34. If section 34 is not satisfied and
the particulars are not furnished by the assessee his claim for depreciation under section 32 cannot be
allowed.Section 29 is thus to be read with reference to other provisions of Act. It is not in itself a complete
code.
If the revised return is a valid return and the assessee has withdrawn the claim of depreciation it cannot
be granted relying on the original return when the assessment is based on the revised return. Allowance
of depreciation is calculated on the written down value of the assets, which written down value would be
the actual cost of acquisition less the aggregate of all deductions "actually allowed" to the assessee for
the past years. "Actually allowed" does not mean "notionally allowed". If the assessee has not claimed
deduction of depreciation in any past year it cannot be said that it was notionally allowed to him. A thing
is "allowed" when it is claimed. A subtle distinction is there when we examine the language used
in section 16 and sections 34 and 37 of the Act. It is rightly said a privilege cannot be a disadvantage and
an option cannot become an obligation. The Assessing Officer cannot grant depreciation allowance when
the same is not claimed by the assessee.
NON-CLAIMING OF DEPRECIATION :
Non-claiming of depreciation may at times be more beneficial rather than claiming it. Accordingly one
may plan not to claim depreciation in a particular year and to claim the same in a subsequent year, in
which depreciation can be claimed at a higher written down value due to non-claiming of depreciation in
the earlier year. In this process the benefit of depreciation is not lost but it is deferred only.
In the following situations it is advisable not to claim the depreciation-
i) In case where certain deductions and allowances like brought forward investment allowance may lapse
for insufficiency of profits, in a particular year, if the depreciation is claimed.
ii) In case of non-corporate assessees expecting higher profit in the subsequent year or years, if their
present income is falling in lower tax bracket, as claim of depreciation in the subsequent years will help
them reducing the taxable profits and thereby saving tax, which would have been payable at a higher
rate considering the slab rates.
Non-claiming of depreciation may be used for avoiding the provisions of section 50. It may be noted
that profit on sale of depreciable asset is treated as Short Term Capital Gain under section 50.
Therefore, if any person desires to hold an asset for the purpose of re-sale at a future date, particularly
in cases where such asset is retained for such period which may entitle him to claim it as a long term
asset, then it is advisable not to claim depreciation on the same. In such a process, the profit on sale of
the asset will be beyond the mischief of sec. 50 and shall be treated as Long Term Capital Gain
(LTCG). As a result such assessee will be entitled to the benefit of cost inflation index as well as the
concessional rate of tax on LTCG.
Further w.e.f. assessment year 1997-98 depreciation can be carried forward for 8 assessment
years only, as such it has become more important to claim it only in the year in which taxable
profit arises.
CLAIM OF DEPRECIATION ONLY WHEN AN ASSET IS USED FOR BUSINESS :
One of the stipulation for claiming depreciation under section 32(1) is that the assessee had used the
asset for the purpose of business or profession. When an asset will be considered to have been used,
has been a matter of controversy. Some important Judicial views are as under :-
Punjab National Bank Ltd. v. CIT 141 ITR 886 (Del.)- That depreciation had to be allowed in full on the
lifts and the air-conditioning plant since they were being used by the assessee for the purpose of its
business, the fact that they might also be utilised by the tenant of one of the floors or customers or
visitors did not make any difference. Plant or machinery could be said to be used by somebody else if
such other person has control over the same. It is the control which determines who is using it. "User"
means not only getting benefit, but also controlling, running, stopping, repairing, replacing, etc.
Whittle Anderson Ltd. v. CIT 79 ITR 613 (Bom.)- The word "used" should be understood in a wide
sense so as to embrace passive as well as active user ; when machinery is kept ready for use at any
moment in a particular factory under an express agreement from which taxable profits are earned, the
machinery can be said to be "used" for the purposes of the business which earned the profits although it
was not actually worked. Western India Vegetable Products Ltd. v. CIT 26 ITR 151 (Bom.)- When a
business is established and is ready to commence then it can be said of that business that it is set up;
but before it is ready to commence business it is not set up. There may however be an interval between
the setting up of the business and the commencement of the business and all expenses incurred during
that interval would be permissible deductions.
CWT v. Ramaraju Surgical Cotton Mills Ltd. 63 ITR 478 (SC)- A unit cannot be said to have been set
up unless it is ready to discharge the function for which it is being set up. It is only when the unit has
been put into such a shape that it can start functioning as a business or a manufacturing organisation
that it can be said that the unit has been set up.
CIT v. Industrial Solvents and Chemicals (P) Ltd. 119 ITR 608 (Bom.)- Even if the finished product
obtained by the assessee could be termed as sub-standard, it cannot be contended that because the end
product then obtained was not of proper standard, the business of the assessee cannot be said to have
been set up though the plant was being worked.
Grasim Industries Ltd. v. CIT 32 TTJ 329 (Bom-Trib.)- A company need not have actually commenced
production to claim depreciation. It was enough if it was merely ready to produce. The bench ruled that
the plant was "ready for" business in fiscal 1992-93, and hence eligible for claiming depreciation.
TREATMENT OF REPAIRS- WHETHER ON REVENUE OR CAPITAL ACCOUNT :
It is more or less an age old tradition to treat only small repairs to an asset as revenue expenditure.
However, there are occasions when heavy repairs are undertaken and/or one whole item of Plant &
Machinery may require replacement. The taxing authority tends to immediately jump to the conclusion
that the same is on capital account. The assessee also succumbs to the assertion of the authorities
under ignorance of law. The result, no appeal thereby inviting heavy taxation.