Role: Co-founder of ColourPop cosmetic

Animal Testing on Cosmetic should be banned

 This form of animal testing is unnecessary and unreliable

-According to the National Vivisection Society, each species responds
differently to drugs and other substances.

 Expensive To Do
-These animals must be fed and housed for a very long time. The repeated use
of ingredients also adds up quite a bit.

 There are now alternatives to animal testing that render its use obsolete
-Because of many technological advances, there are alternatives for animal
testing. EpiSkin, a synthetic skin, has been an accepted alternative to be used
in testing cosmetics. Corrositex, a similar synthetic skin akin to a human.

 It performs tests that are not necessary

-Unfortunately, animal testing on cosmetics does not always lead to the
release of new cosmetics. In fact, there are tests done, without products
actually put into use.

References
https://navajocodetalkers.org/9-integral-pros-and-cons-of-animal-test
ing-on-cosmetics/

https://www.ehow.co.uk/info_8077283_arguments-against-animal-testing-
cosmetics.html

https://greengarageblog.org/12-pros-and-cons-of-animal-testing-on-cos
metics