Professional Documents
Culture Documents
COG
Retail Locations Qty X Y DIST WGT.DIST
RL1 425 100 80 29.00 12327
RL2 320 86 40 23.89 7644
RL3 220 20 60 57.16 12575
965 32546
69.65
77.70
Weber Method (2)
Site Coordinates SO1
Retail Locations Qty X Y Site Option X Y Dist
RL1 425 100 80 SO1 60 50 89.44
RL2 320 86 40 SO2 70 75 47.71
RL3 220 20 60 SO3 41 55 72.11
965 Total Wgt Dist
WEBER
DIST
17.5
26.3
69.6
SO1 SO2 SO3
Wgt Dist Dist Wgt Dist Dist Wgt Dist
38,013 30.41 12,926 64.08 27,233
15,266 38.48 12,315 47.43 15,179
15,864 52.20 11,484 21.59 4,749
69,144 Total Wgt Dist 36,725 Total Wgt Dist 47,161
WEBER
TOTL.DIST
7457
8418
15304
31179
Goal = Selecting Best Facility Location
Input Range
Pairwise comparisons among sites based on distance from plant Normalized matrix
Site 1 Site 2 Site 3
Site 1 1 1/2 1/3
Site 2 2 1 1/3
Site 3 3 3 1
Pairwise comparisons among sites based on distance from retail Normalized matrix
Site 1 Site 2 Site 3
Site 1 1 1/2 1/2
Site 2 2 1 3
Site 3 2 1/3 1
Scores
Scores
Scores
Scores
Results
0.0000
Remarks
For more Information,
email: gtech.ic@gmail
https://www.faceboo
more Information, Help and yours Valueable feedback please
ail: gtech.ic@gmail.com
or
ase Like Us our Facebook Page:
https://www.facebook.com/gtech.ic
Obj. Function
Z= $ 10,708
Decision Variables
Demand Region
Supply Region Plants
DR1 DR2 DR3 DR4 DR5
SR1 12 8 0 0 0 1
SR2 0 0 0 0 0 0
SR3 0 0 0 0 0 0
SR4 0 0 0 0 0 0
SR5 0 0 0 0 0 0
Constraints
Formula Cell
Input Cell
Supply Region
SR
DR Demand Region
1 Open
0 Closed
Capacity
20
20
20
20
20