Professional Documents
Culture Documents
05 Compendium of Cases V - LCs Rules & Docs
05 Compendium of Cases V - LCs Rules & Docs
Although the revising bank remarked the discrepancies and notified the beneficiary, he insisted in forwarding the documents to the
Issuing as they were. The beneficiary mentioned to the bank that in the past he had exactly the same situation and the applicant always
accepted the discrepancies.
As instructed the advising bank forwarded the documents by Courier to the Issuing bank with a report of the discrepancies. Later on,
the advising bank requested status of the documents by swift.
QUESTIONS
You are requested to review the case and make your prediction of the possible consequences.
NOTE: IMAGINE THAT THERE WILL BE NO PROBLEM WITH THE CANADIAN FOOD INSPECTION AGENCY TO TAKE THE LOAD
IN.
_[______________________________________________________________________________________________________
_[______________________________________________________________________________________________________
_[______________________________________________________________________________________________________
_[______________________________________________________________________________________________________
_[______________________________________________________________________________________________________
_[______________________________________________________________________________________________________
_[______________________________________________________________________________________________________
_[______________________________________________________________________________________________________
_[______________________________________________________________________________________________________
_[______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Nevertheless, these conditions, the seller embarks different merchandise (of minor quality) to the agreed one and it obtains
the documents that the bank was requesting him in agreement to the instructions of the letter of credit and, according to it, the
Republican Bank of Buenos Aires proceeds to pay. When the merchandise arrives to Callao the buyer notices that they had
embarked goods different from those he requested and claims to the Argentine bank and to the Spanish Bank of Lima (issuer
of the letter of credit) the reasons that led them to effect the payment to the seller.
Pregunta: ¿Quién actuó correctamente: el importador Chiclayo SAC o el Banco Republicano de Buenos Aires al haber
dispuesto el pago al vendedor? Argumente su respuesta en base a lo establecido por el folleto 600 de la CCI.
Question: Who acted correctly: the importer Chiclayo SAC or the Republican Bank of Buenos Aires on having arranged to pay
the seller? Prepare your reply based on the articles shown below.
a) With the last export that I had with destination to England I faced the following problem: the Letter of credit required,
among other documents, a copy of the EXPORT LICENSE, which we understood is like a visa for export. We know also
that for England the above mentioned document is not required but It is, the Certificate of Origin, for what we decided to
issue a document with the title EXPORT LICENSE, in a paper with the letterhead of the company. Thinking that the Letter
of credit was not specifying the one who had to issue the above mentioned document and resting on the Art. 14f of the
UCP 600, we proceeded to issue the document.
Documents were negotiated by our bank who proceeded to dispatch them to the Issuing bank. Within a few days the
Correspondent bank notified my bank of a discrepancy with which I was forced to get in touch with my client and to ask
him to accept the discrepancy and that we would pay the discrepancy costs.
b) In other exports it has happened to me that when I present an AirWay Bill or a Bill of Lading, some Banks demand that
the term “Clean on Board” has to be present, either pre printed or added by the shipping company under the justification
that it is required by the LC. We believe that this is required more by a habit or custom than by real need, because it
should be understood that if there is no observation in the A/B or B/L is because the merchandise was delivered in good
order and for that we believe we are covered with Art.27 from the UCP 600.
c) At this point we would like to find out how valid is the UCP 600 from the ICC in regards to banks acting differently or is it
that we are misinterpreting the rules?
QUESTIONS
According to what you have learned in the course and with the help of articles 14f and 27 from UCP 600,
¿What do you consider we should answer the customer for his enquiries a), b) and c)?
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
EXTRACT FROM ICC’s PUB 600 – UNIFORM CUSTOMS AND PRACTICE FOR DOCUMENTARY CREDITS
d. Data in a document, when read in context with the credit, the document itself and international standard
banking practice, need not be identical to, but must not conflict with, data in that document, any other
stipulated document or the credit.
e. In documents other than the commercial invoice, the description of the goods, services or performance, if
stated, may be in general terms not conflicting with their description in the credit.
f. If a credit requires presentation of a document other than a transport document, insurance document or
commercial invoice, without stipulating by whom the document is to be issued or its data content, banks will
accept the document as presented if its content appears to fulfil the function of the required document and
otherwise complies with sub-article 14 (d).
g. A document presented but not required by the credit will be disregarded and may be returned to the
presenter.
3. What is the validity of the letter of credit and where does it expire? 31D: 030615 4 and half months. ExPIRES AT ANY BANK COUNTER
4. Are there any tolerances in amount and quantity? If yes, do they differ? 45A 5/5 tolerance
6. Who is the Negotiating Bank? In what country are the documents negotiated 42D: Citibank, NY, US
7. Are partial shipments allowed? If yes, do you think there might be complications for this reason? 43p: yes, it is allowed, extra
8. Is transshipment allowed? If yes, do you think there might be complications for this reason? 43T: no, it is not allowed,
10. Which is the last date for the documents presentation? 48: DOCUMENTS MUST BE PRESENTED FOR NEGOTIATION WITHIN 31
DAYS AFTER TRANSPORT DOCUMENTS/ FORWARDER CARGO RECEIPT ISSUED. (DAYS AFTER TRANSPORT DOCUMENTS) Commented [A1]: Si no se pone los días, asumimos que es 21
11. Graph the terms of the L/C and verify if there is a chance for any complication
14. Where should the Negotiating Bank send the documents to obtain refund? Citibank
15. What are the terms of payment of the export? 42c at sight , 45A : FOB
16. Review the required documents and mention in the following space your observations:
copy , packing list, 46A: commercial invoice, 3 originals, 1 copy original packing list, inspections certificate
________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________ __________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________ ___
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
NOTE:
For your information, a HOUSE AIR WAY BILL - HAWB is a document issued by freight forwarders in the case of consolidated goods to be
shipped grouped for air freight. It is considered equivalent to the AWB in documentary operations, whenever it is transparent within the
document that the issuer assumes responsibility as a carrier or is acting as an agent of the appointed carrier.
Imagine that you are the Documentary Credit specialist of the Advising Bank. Today you have received a
document presentation from a beneficiary.
Assume that the remittance letter was in order, that all the documents were received in the required amount of
originals and copies and with the proper signatures in those documents that were supposed to be signed.
You are given the Documentary Credit and Bill of Lading and we request that you identify 5 discrepancies with
the help of the checklist shown below:
A. Late presentation
C. Dirty or claused Bill of Lading Commented [A4]: es cuando la mercancía presenta daños
D. Late shipment x
F. Shipped on Deck x
G. Transport Document doesn’t identify the forwarder x Commented [A5]: no especifica la empresa (USA EXPORTER)
H. Unauthenticated Alterations
Notify ASIAN DEVELOPMENT CO. RECEIVED the goods in apparent good order and as far
as ascertained reasonable means of checking, as specified
H. K. Central Square below unless as specified below unless otherwise stated.
H. K. The carrier, in accordance with the provisions contained in
the document:
a) undertakes to perform or to procure the performance of
the entire transport from the place at which the goods are
taken in charge to the place designated for delivery in this
document, and
b) Assumes liability as prescribed in this document for such
transport. One of the B/Ls must be surrendered duly
endorsed in exchange for the goods or delivery order.
IN WITNESS whereof three (3) original B/Ls have been
signed. If not otherwise stated below, one of which being
accomplished the other(s) to be void.
MV SKY 33 B YORKTOWN VA
ORIGINAL
SHIPPED ON BOARD MV
SKY XXXX-11-21
Declared Value of the goods (see clause 11) of Place and date of issue xxxxx-11-24
US$
In the following 2 pages you will find: a very small SWIFT message as well as a sample of a Bill of Lading.
You are requested to act as a bank employee whose main function is to locate discrepancies in export documents.
Kindly compare each detail of the LC with those on the B/L and write in the space provided below all the discrepancies
that you find.
3% se paga el balance
SHIPPED ON BOARD
06/07/99
EGG COMPAGNIES PERU AS AGENT
ON BEHALF OF COMPAÑIA DE NAVEGACION
ALTAMAR DE C A. AS CARRIER