Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Abstract
SAMPLE PREPARATION:
Preparation Standard solution
The stocks solution for Cu, Ni and Pb were made from a metal salt of Analar grade (purity
99.9%). The metal salt was dissolved in dil. HCl and diluted to the 1 litre mark using
distilled water. The required concentrations were 1000ppm, 100ppm, 10ppm, 1ppm, 3ppm,
5ppm prepared by serial dilution of stock solution.
Samples were digested by the wetdigestion method. 10 ml of nitric acid was added to 2 g
ofaccurately weighed dried sample in a 100 ml beaker and washeated on a hot plate at 95°C
for 15 min. The digest was cooledand 5 ml of concentrated nitric acid was added and
heated foradditional 30 min at 95°C. The last step was repeated and thesolution was
reduced to about 5 ml without boiling. The samplewas cooled and filtered through a
Whatman No. 42 filter paperand diluted in 100ml volumetric flask with deionized water.
Lead: Results obtained show that highest concentration of lead was found in
Aloe Vera (9.693 ppm) followed by Ginger (5.99 ppm) tomato (2.733 ppm) turmeric
(1.918 ppm), Curry leaves (1.780 ppm) and Neem (0.354 ppm) while inPudin Hara,
Black Pepper, Carrot Lead is not detectable. The WHO prescribed limit for
leadcontents in herbal medicine is 10 ppm while the dietary intake limit for lead is 3
mg/week. However, for medicinalherbs limit was 10 ppm set by China, Malaysia,
Thailand and WHO. Similarly plants with those proposed by WHO it was found that
all the selected six herbs have Lead below permissible limit set by China, Malaysia,
Thailand and FAO/ WHO. But here some interesting data for Aloe Vera because
their lead concentrations it just below the maximum point of permissible limit i.e.
9.693ppm and permissible limit is 10.00 ppm. Lead is not an essential element for
life and it is very toxic for the nervous system and for the kidneys.(5)
3 Pudinhara ND 2.780 ND
TABLE.1. Concentration (ppm) of Copper (Cu), nickel (Ni), lead (pb) in herbal samples
A total of three elements (Cu, Ni, and Pb) were determined in the samples of
medicinal plants using atomic absorption spectrophotometer (AAS). Graph.1, .2, .3, shows
the concentrations of various metals inthe analysed herbal plantsand tabular form of data of
metal concentration analysis is given in the (Table.1)
1.4
tomato
1.2
1.004 carrot
1
0.8
0.6 0.532
0.4
0.2
0
Samples
100 96
turmeric
concentration(in ppm)
80 neem
pudin hara
60
aloe vera
40 kari leaves
20.05 carrot
20
ginger
4.024 2.78
0.653 0.412 0.018
0
samples
8 aloe vera
5.99 kari leaves
6
tomato
4
2.733
1.918 1.78
ginger
2
0.354
0
samples
CONCLUSION
Medicinal plants are sources of a large number of active principles of herbal and modern
medicine. Indian people have a tremendous passion for medicinal plants and use them for a
wide range of health related applications from a common cold to cancer and treatment of
poisonous snake bites to a cure for genetic disorders like muscular dystrophy.The present
investigation clearly demonstrated the variation in heavy metal concentration.The
concentration (ppm) of heavy metals in plants extract was found to be as follows: Cu (0.532 to
1.867), Ni(0.018 to 96.00) and Pb(0.354 to 9.693). The maximum concentrations of copper
were found in tomato (1.867), Nickel in Aloe Vera (96) and lead in Aloe Vera (9.693).The
developed AAS technique is a precise, specific and accurate method for estimation of heavy
metal content in stem and leaf samples of these medicinal plants. From the comparison of the
results with the defined permissible concentration limits it was concluded that the levels of
heavy metals present in the Herbs fall in permissible range for consume medical herbs.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
We are very grateful to Dr Hemant Kulshreshtha,Head , Department of chemistry St.
John’s College, Agra for the technical and material support and provision of laboratory space
for the extraction process, equipment to carry out project and for use of college Research
laboratory under supervision of Dr. Susan Verghese. My sincere gratitude goes to the St.
John’s College, Agra
REFERENCE
1. FAO/WHO., 1984. Contaminants. In Codex Alimentarius, vol. XVII, Edition 1. FAO/WHO,
Codex AlimentariusCommision,Rome
2. World Health Organization, 1998. Quality methods for medicinal plant materials. Published
by poisoning and also poses adverse effects on kidney, liver, WHO, Geneva.
3. WHO 2005. Quality Control Methods for Medicinal Plant Materials, Revised, Geneva.
4. Ernst E. Toxic heavy metals and undeclared drugs in Asianherbal medicines, Trends
Pharmacol. Sc. 23, 136-139 (2002)
5. WHO. Environmental Health Criteria: International Programme on Chemical Safety. World
Health Organization, Geneva. Pp 165 (1995)
6. Sharma D.K., Rai S., Arora S.S., Gupta P.M., Sharma R. and Chopra A.K. Study of the trace
elements in Aloe veraL. (Aloe barbandensisMiller) viz. Liliaceae and its biological and
environmental importance, J. Chem. Pharm Res., 3(3), 64 (2011)
7. Farr G., The hair tissue mineral analysis/why heavy metals are a hazard to your health,
Updated 31Dec., (2009).Available from:
(http://www.becomehealthynow.com/ebookprint.php?id=122)
8.
9.
#PHYSICO-CHEMICAL EXAMINATION OF
SOIL IN AGRA REGION
*SUSAN VERGHESE.P, REKHA KUMARI,RITU RANA,SANDHYA YADAV,
NAMI JAIN,ARYAN VASHISHTH, SHILPA ANAND,SHALINI
NELSON**NELIA DAVID***& HEMANT KULSHRESHTHA****
E mail-susan.jaisan@yahoo.com
ABSTRACT
Soil is the most important parameter for the plants and human beings.
Soil provides a physic matrix, chemical environment and biological setting
for water in order to meet an ever increasing demand of production. The
soil is going to be polluted day by day. Soil contamination is caused by the
presence of xenobiotic chemicals or other alteration in the natural soil
environment. It is caused by industrial activity, agricultural activity,
chemicals or improper disposal of waste. The most common chemical
involved are petroleum, hydrocarbon,poly nuclear hydro carbons,
solvents, pesticides and heavy metals, Contamination is correlated with
the degree of industrialisation, and intensity of chemical usage. The
concern over soil contamination stems primarily from health risks from
direct contact with contaminated soil vapours from the contaminants and
from contaminated water supply within and underlying the soil. Heavy
metals are element that exhibit metallic properties such as ductility,
malleability, conductivity, cation stability, and ligand specificity. They are
characterized by relatively high density and high relative atomic weight
with an atomic number greater than 20. Some heavy metals such as Co,
Cu,Fe,Mn,Mo,Ni,V, and Zn are required in minute quantities by
organisms. However, excessive amounts of these elements can become
harmful to organisms. Other heavy metals such as Pb,Cd,Hg, and as(a
metalloid but generally referred to as a heavy metal) do not have a
beneficial effect on organisms and are thus regarded as the “main
threats” since they are very harmful to both plants and animals (Mellor
1999). Ten samples have been collected from different regions of Agra
during post winter season and have analysed for heavy metals apart from
basic parameters. Result indicates that in some region nickel and lead
exceeds the permissible limit.
INTRODUCTION
Soil is a multipart of physical and biological schemes, which give support
to the plants and supplies waterand essential nutrients to them. It is the
main pool of the nutrients essential for customary growth of the plants.
Soil is an essential constituent of the biosphere, but it must be
nurturedand cultivated to convey it to its highest potential (Olaniya
1998). The availability of minerals affects the specific enzymatic action
directly and eventually adversely affects plant growth. Due to plant
growth nutrient relationship and general importance the need of physico-
chemical parameter and heavy metals scrutiny of soil is essential with the
objective of using specific relationship as plant growth indicator.
The experimental data shown in table 1 that the lead (Pb) concentration
(mg/l) in soil ranges from 0.107 to 5.320mg/l similarly the Ni
concentrations (mg/l) in soil ranges from 0.893 to 3.216mg/l.These values
are lower than the permissible limits as shown in table 2. The distribution
pattern of nickel in agricultural soil understudy is clearly showing the
unsuitability of these soils for agricultural purpose since most of the
concentrations of the trace metals understudy were below the
permissible limit of trace metals in soil as recommended by various
agencies in the world the permissible limit. It has been realised that a
study of soil analysis is imperative in order to understand plant nutrition,
soil fertility as well as seasonal prototype of exchange between plant and
soil.
TABLE-1
Sample Location Ni Pb
1 BODLA 0.893 2.530
2 KHERIYA MOD 0.304 1.307
3 FATEHPUR -0.816 1.539
SIKARI
4 ST. JOHN’S 0.146 -0.810
5 MADHU NAGAR -0.540 0.107
6 TAJ GANJ 3.217 2.376
7 YAMUNA SOIL -0.955 1.628
8 PALIWAL PARK -5.590 2.077
9 DAYALBAGH -0.9023 5.0320
10 *TARGET VALUE 85 35
11 **INTERVENTION 550 210
VALUES OF SOIL
Where *target values are specified to indicate desirable maximum levels of
elements in unpolluted soils.
*
*
3.5 Concentration of heavymetal(ppm)
Ni in soil samples
I
3
n
t
e2.5
r
v2
e
n1.5 Ni
t
i 1
o
n
0.5
v
0
a 1 2 3 4
l
ue when remedial action is necessary.
Concentration of heavymetal(ppm) in soil samples
Pb
6
3
Pb
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
CONCLUSION
The levels of these trace metal in soil were generally below the
permissible level of normal agriculture land particularly Pb and Ni. The
significant concentration of these metals in agricultural land is favourable
to the crops yield.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Authors are grateful to school of Chemical Sciences Dept of chemistry, St
Johns College Agra for providing marvellous opportunity to carry out
project work and are highly thankful to Dr.HemantKulshreshtha (HOD of
Chemistry Dept), and Dr.SusanVerghese P. to give their valuable
instructions to carry out the whole work.
REFERANCES
1. Olaniya, M.S. et al. 1998. Heavy metal pollution of agricultural soil
and vegetation due to application of municipal soild waste –A case
study. I.J. enivromental health. 40(2): 160- 168.
2. Jackson, M.L. 1967. Soil chemical analysis. Prentice hall of indiapvt.
Ltd.., New Delhi .
3. Anderson, A. and Nilsson,K.O. 1973. Enrichment of trace element
from sewage sludge fertilizers in soils and plants. Ambio.I :176-179.
4. Sharma yogesh and totwat, K.L.2002. effect of municipal sewage
water on the soil properties and chemical composition of vegetables
grown on sandy soil of Bikaner (rajasthan). Proc. 11th national
symposium on environment. 320-323.
5. Mellor , A. and bevan, J.R. 1999. Lead in the soil and stream
sediments of an urban catchment in tyne side. U.K. water air soil
pollut. 112: 327-348.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.