Performance Evaluation

DATE:
(I.E., 07/01/01)

ORGN/DEPT:

CNIC ID#: REVIEW PERIOD (

From:
EMPLOYEE NAME:
(I.E., 07/01/0

JOB TITLE: OVE

INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Complete all sections (A, B and C).
2. Carefully evaluate each of the factors separately, based on recurring day-to-day performance since the last review
or isolated exceptional events. Use examples, whenever possible, to support each performance rating.
3. There are ten core performance categories. All exempt employees must be rated in each of these areas and given
on performance. There are also five optional performance categories that may be relevant, depending on the exemp

4. For each factor, evaluate the employee using the definitions provided below.
5. The overall rating will be automatically calculated on Page 3.

EXCELLENT (EXCEEDS
Performance frequently STANDARDS)
exceeds (4)
the established requirements for the job. The employee fully understands the positi
appropriate initiative, and requires only occasional direct supervision.

GOOD (FULLY
Performance MEETS
fully meetsSTANDARDS) (3) requirements for the job. The employee is familiar with all aspects of the
all the established
a competent and satisfactory manner.

ACCEPTABLE (USUALLY
Performance usually meets MEETS STANDARDS)
all the minimal (2) requirements for the job. The employee’s performance occas
established
improvement.

UNSATISFACTORY (SUBSTANTIALLY
Performance is considered SHORT
below established OF STANDARDS)
requirements (1) The employee needs to improve performanc
for the job.
reach satisfactory performance and/or additional training to bring performance within acceptable limits.

The care and accuracy with which this appraisal is completed will
determine its value to you, to the employee, and to the organization.

SECTION A: KNOWLEDGE
 Knowledge of Procurement Laws applicable in Pakistan
(PPRA , SPRA, KPRA, BRPA, PPRA Fedrea, World bank Procurement Rules)

Excellent (4) ✘ Good (3) Acceptable (2) Unsatisfactory (1)

COMMENTS:

Grip on the Relevant Procurement

knowledge is not enough, grip on rules is important

✘ Excellent (4) Good (3) Acceptable (2) Unsatisfactory (1)

COMMENTS:

Compliance of Rules
Demonstrates ability to make sensible and appropriate decisions. Demonstrates discretion/professionalism in unusu

Excellent (4) ✘ Good (3) Acceptable (2) Unsatisfactory (1)

COMMENTS:

Ability to maneuver within the limit of rules

Demonstrates skills and an understanding of the position, policies, and procedures required in procurements

Excellent (4) ✘ Good (3) Acceptable (2) Unsatisfactory (1)

COMMENTS:

Selection of right procurement procedures and methods

ability to Identifies and adopt procedure for procurements

Excellent (4) ✘ Good (3) Acceptable (2) Unsatisfactory (1)

COMMENTS:

SECTION B: PLANNING AND IMPLEMENTATION

Procurement Planning
Develops and utilizes methods and work organization to efficiently plan yearly procurements

Excellent (4) ✘ Good (3) Acceptable (2) Unsatisfactory (1)

COMMENTS:

Economic and Efficient Procurement

Procurements proceeded in a way to ensure economy and efficiency.
Excellent (4) Good (3) Acceptable (2) Unsatisfactory (1)

COMMENTS:

QUANTITY/APPLICATION
The amount of work an individual accomplishes. Consistently applies ability and completes work in given timeframe.

Excellent (4) Good (3) Acceptable (2) Unsatisfactory (1)

COMMENTS:

Diversity in Procurement
completion of different type of procurements

Excellent (4) Good (3) Acceptable (2) Unsatisfactory (1)

COMMENTS:

SECTION C: BIDDING

Perfection in making Bidding documents and designing bid notices

Demonstrates ability to effectively reac

Excellent (4) ✘ Good (3) Acceptable (2) Unsatisfactory (1)

COMMENTS:

Designing of Evalution/
Performs group TORs/Specification
presentations to ensure
in an effective, credible, andwidest competition
professional manner. Disseminates information to group
that is concise and easy to understand.

Excellent (4) ✘ Good (3) Acceptable (2) Unsatisfactory (1)

COMMENTS:

Making quality and unambigious Specifications

Responds accurately and appropriately to required procurement demands

Excellent (4) ✘ Good (3) Acceptable (2) Unsatisfactory (1)

COMMENTS:

OTHER (IDENTIFY)

Excellent (4) Good (3) ✘ Acceptable (2) Unsatisfactory (1)

COMMENTS:
 PERFORMANCE RATING CALCULATION

Gray-shaded areas contain formulas and are protected against entry.

PERFORMANCE CATEGORIES PERFORMANCE RATING

OVERALL KNOWLEDGE 3.00

GRIP ON RULES 4.00
COMPLIANCE 0.00
MANEUVERING 0.00
SELECTION OF PROCEDURES 4.00
PLANNING 0.00
ECONOMY AND EFFICIENCY 0.00
QUANTITY/APPLICATION 0.00
DIVERSITY 0.00
PERFECTION 0.00
WIDEST COMPETITION 0.00
SPECIFICATIONS 4.00
OTHERS 3.00

NUMBER OF CATEG
TOTAL: 15.00
(Field automatically counts categ

OVERALL PERFORMANCE RATING: 3.00

Evaluated By:
Print Name Signature

Reviewed By:
(Next Level Supervisor) Print Name Signature
EVIEW PERIOD (Month/Year):
To:
Jul-01
(I.E., 07/01/01)

OVERALL RATING:

3.0

ce the last review and not on recent

ting.
se areas and given specific feedback
ding on the exempt position.

erstands the position, takes the

all aspects of the position and performs these in

erformance occasionally may require

prove performance significantly to

mits.

d will
zation.
 RATING: 3.00

RATING: 4.00

ionalism in unusual situations.

RATING: 0.00

urements

RATING: 0.00

RATING: 4.00

RATING: 0.00
 RATING: 0.00

given timeframe.

RATING: 0.00

RATING: 0.00

RATING: 0.00

ormation to group participants in a way

RATING: 0.00

RATING: 4.00

RATING: 3.00
gainst entry.

UMBER OF CATEGORIES:
5
ld automatically counts categories entered)