Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2019 Homework 002 PDF
2019 Homework 002 PDF
Hand to TA in tutorial.
x3 − y 3
2. Define f (x, y) = .
x2 + y 2
√
(i) Prove that 0 ≤ |f (x, y)| ≤ 2 x2 + y 2 for all (x, y) ∈ Dom(f ).
(ii) Find the limit lim f (x, y) for all (a, b) ∈ R2 .
(x,y)→(a,b)
x3 +y 5
3. Determine, with reason if the limit lim 2 2 exists or not.
(x,y)→(0,0) +y
x
For any given ε > 0, one can find δ > 0, such that the following holds: 7. Proposition. (Directional limit of f along a curve)
If for any q ∈ Dom(f ), q ̸= p and ∥p − q∥ < δ, then Suppose that the limit lim f (x, y) = ℓ as (x, y) approaches to (a, b), and let
(x,y)→(a,b)
C : r(t) = ( x(t), y(t) ) be a continuous curve in Dom(f ) whenever t ̸= 0, and
|f (q) − f (p)| < ε.
passing through (a, b) at t = 0.
Then ℓ is the directional limit g(t) = f ◦ r(t) = f (x(t), y(t)) of the function f
4. Theorem. Laws of Limit Let c be a constant, and suppose that f (v) and g(v)
along the curve C at t = 0, i.e. lim g(t) = ℓ.
are two functions defined on the same domain D such that lim f (v) = A and t→0
v→p
lim g(v) = B exist and both are finite, then we have Remarks. (i) This proposition is often used to prove that the following limit
v→p
(a) Sum and Difference Rules: lim ( f (v) + g(v) ) = A + B, and lim f (x, y)
v→p (x,y)→(a,b)
lim ( f (v) − g(v) ) = A − B;
v→p does not exist.
(b) Product Rule: lim ( f (v) · g(v) ) = A · B; (ii) Read the examples at page 36 and 37 in lecture notes 2019-lecture-03.pdf
v→p
Solution. (i) Note that ex · ey = ex+y for all (x, y) ∈ R2 , with For any (x, y) ∈ Dom(g), we have x + y ̸= 0, so
{ }
Dom(ex+y ) = (x, y) ∈ R2 | x + y ∈ Dom(e(−) ) = R = R2 . x2 + 2xy + y 2 (x + y)2
g(x, y) = = =x+y on Dom(g).
x+y x+y
ex+y
Define f (x, y) = x+y+2 , then the domain of f is given by This means that the function g coincides with the polynomial function x + y on
( ) its domain Dom(g). Consequently, it follows from law of limit for addition that
ex+y
Dom(f ) = Dom lim g(x, y) = lim (x + y) = 0 + 0 = 0.
x+y+2 (x,y)→(0,0) (x,y)→(0,0)
{ }
= Dom(ex+y ) ∩ (x, y) ∈ Dom(x + y + 2) | x + y + 2 ̸= 0
x4 − y 4
{ } 2. Example. Determine the limit lim f (x, y) where f (x, y) =
.
= R2 \ (x, y) ∈ R2 | x + y + 2 = 0 . (x,y)→(a,b) x2 + y 2
Solution. Recall that both numerator x − y and denominator x + y 2 are
4 4 2
Hence, we can evaluate the value of function f (x, y) via the following two steps: polynomials in x and y, so
lim (x4 − y 4 ) = a4 − b4 , and lim (x2 + y 2 ) = a2 + b2 .
h g ex+y (x,y)→(a,b) (x,y)→(a,b)
(x, y) −→ x+y −→ ,
x+y+2 We divide our discussion according to the following 2 cases:
where h(x, y) = x + y and g is a function g of one variable defined by (i) As (a, b) ̸= (0, 0), we know that a2 + b2 ̸= 0. It follows from the law of limit
for quotient that
et x4 − y 4 a4 − b4
g(t) = , with Dom(g) = R \ {−2}. lim = .
t+2 (x,y)→(a,b) x2 + y 2 a2 + b2
et (t + 1) (ii) Now (a, b) = (0, 0), then a2 + b2 = 0, so the law of limit for √
quotient in (i)
We can use the quotient rule to find out that g ′ (t) = for any point t of
(t + 2)2 fails. For any (x, y) ∈ Dom(g) = R2 \ {(0, 0)}, we have r = x2 + y 2 > 0,
Dom(g), and hence g is continuous on Dom(g). In particular, we have and rewrite (x, y) in terms of polar coordinates,
( )
1 It follows from lim 2(x2 + y 2 ) = 2(02 + 02 ) = 0, and sandwich theorem
lim f (x, y) = lim g(h(x, y)) = g lim h(x, y) = g(0) = . (x,y)→(0,0)
(x,y)→(0,0) (x,y)→(0,0) (x,y)→(0,0) 2 that
lim f (x, y) = 0.
(x,y)→(0,0)
xy(x2 −y 2 )
3. Example. Prove that lim 2 2 = 0.
(x,y)→(0,0) x +y
2
−y )
2
Proof. Let f (x, y) = xy(xx2 +y 2 , in which both xy(x2 − y 2 ) and x2 + y 2 are
polynomial, so its domain is given by
{ }
Dom(f ) = Dom( xy(x2 − y 2 ) ) ∩ (x, y) ∈ R2 x2 + y 2 ̸= 0
{ }
= R2 ∩ (x, y) ∈ R2 x2 + y 2 ̸= 0
= R2 \ { (0, 0) }.
lim f (x, y) = 0.
(x,y)→(0,0)
) (
1
4. Example. Determine with reasons if the limit lim exp −
exists.
(x,y)→(0,0) x2 + y 2
Solution. The limit is 0. Recall the notation of exponential function exp(t) = et .
We proceeds in the following steps:
(a) First define g(t) = et − t on I = [0, +∞), one can easily check that derivative
g ′ (t) = et − 1 ≥ 0 on I, It follows from intermediate value theorem that
g(t) ≥ g(0) = 1 on I, i.e. t < 1 + t ≤ et on I.
1
√ 1
(b) Let r = t
> 0 for all t > 0, then one has t = r2 , and it follows from (a)
that
1 1
2
< exp( 2 ) for any r > 0.
r r
1
Then we have 0 < exp(− 2 ) < (x2 + y 2 ) if r2 = x2 + y 2 .
x + y2
(c) Then it follows It follows from lim (x2 + y 2 ) = 02 + 02 = 0, and
(x,y)→(0,0)
sandwich theorem
( )
1
lim exp − = 0.
(x,y)→(0,0) x + y2
2