Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Carter Hall
Dr. Rachel Gelfand
American Studies 202
7 December 2019
Introduction
Upon arriving at the New World in 1620, pilgrims from England were forced to quickly
adapt their lifestyles to a completely new area, relying on the agricultural techniques of Native
Americans to create for themselves a sustainable lifestyle, ultimately sowing the seeds for the
spawning of a world superpower over 150 years later. Since the dawn of America, the nation has
movements.
For North Carolina, much of the advancements in the region have largely concerned
themselves with the cultivation of a variety of tobacco known as “bright-leaf” tobacco. Authors
such as Nannie May Tilley preserved much of the known history about the industry in works
such as her 1948 Bright-Tobacco Industry. Through a written medium, Tilley discusses the
extensive popularity of tobacco and its role as North Carolina’s cash crop. Furthermore, Tilley’s
work also discusses how the tobacco industry forever changed towns and cities like Durham.
quickly made Durham a tobacco hub for the Old Belt, an area comprised of southern Virginia,
northwestern North Carolina and the NC Piedmont. Today, while the city of Durham is
development of new scientific and pharmaceutical technologies, the city’s tobacco legacy is
preserved through a number of minute mediums, capturing a past that changed it forever.
During the 17th and 18th centuries, North Carolina’s agricultural output was insignificant
in comparison to its colonial neighbors. Outcompeted in cotton, rice, and tobacco production, the
state was yearning for any spark that would catalyze their economic growth and make North
Carolina a major agricultural force. Ironically, the answer lied not in the hands of a businessman,
nor in the hands of a farmer, but in those of a slave named Stephen. On a farm in Caswell
County, Stephen oversaw the curing process of tobacco, a series of steps that converted the crop
harvested from the field into a form usable for creating cigars and pipe tobacco. The barn in
which he worked contained a fire, primarily heated my wood, that would heat the tobacco to
scalding temperatures to leave behind a leaf with a brown, charred color. One particular instance,
Stephen reportedly fell asleep beside the fire, awaking to the blaze nearly vanquished. Hurriedly,
the worker cast nearby charcoal onto the remaining embers, creating tobacco leaves with a
bright-yellow coloration, later given the name “bright-leaf” tobacco. (NCpedia 1) Unbeknown to
As technology advanced, much of the bright-leaf tobacco harvested from fields was cured
by something known as a “flue,” or a machine adjoined to a barn that let heat enter the structure
without exposing the crops to smoke. Much of the recorded data about tobacco production in
Hall 3
North Carolina refers to this variety as “flue-cured tobacco,” eventually dominating NC’s
production for decades, as evidenced by the production of a staggering 9.7 million pounds of
Introductory economics posits that for any product with a given supply to succeed in a
market, there must be an appropriate demand for its sale. With a massive supply of a newfound
variety of tobacco being produced in North Carolina, the state looked for ways to garner any
profit it could. Fortunately, fluctuations in what tobacco consumers bought were occurring in
tandem with the state’s bright-leaf tobacco surplus, creating a “perfect storm” for farmers and
businesses to advertise their crops. By the 19th century, tobacco buyers craved the Spanish
cigarette, made from Turkish tobacco which was heavily imported into the region. The North
Carolinian bright-leaf tobacco was of a similar taste and texture, offered at a price much more
affordable for American and British consumers. (POV 1) Businessmen such as Washington
Duke and W.T. Blackwell began finding ways to monopolize tobacco production, building
structures in Durham that housed both markets for selling crops and factories for mass-producing
cigars and cigarettes. W. Duke, Sons and Company and Bull Durham Tobacco Company would
transform the landscape of Durham, bringing to the region unparalleled economic growth from
all over the Southeast, with much of their legacy preserved in the streets and buildings of
In her work, Tilley explains that the strengthened economy for tobacco products in
Durham were the result of a two-step process. First, keen advertising incentivized buyers to
Hall 4
purchase local and from particular companies. Afterwards, allowing machines to become a larger
part of the labor force saved manpower and produced products at a more efficient rate.
In 1884, W. Duke, Sons and Company advertised themselves as “up against a stone
wall,” having the incredibly tough challenge of dominating Bull Durham Tobacco as the primary
source of tobacco products. What enabled the company to surmount was, according to Tilley,
“dividing their profits with the dealers and consumers;” when the internal revenue tax was
lowered in 1883, many companies refused to budge on price for fear of hurting profits. Having
nothing to lose, the Dukes lowered their prices but experienced an overwhelming growth in
sales, advertising by simply garnering more product placement than other nearby competitors.
Coupled with the installment of mechanical labor later that year, W. Duke, Sons and Company
quickly became a major tobacco empire by the turn of the 20th century.
From the utilization of a conveyor belt building early-model Ford vehicles to robot
vacuum-cleaners allowing for effortless cleaning of the home, the mechanization of labor has
been an integral part of advancements in American innovation. During the early-1800s, cigars
and cigarettes were rolled by hand, companies dependent on machine only for the conversion of
tobacco into usable forms. Little innovation in the tobacco industry occurred for most of the
century until the patenting of the Bonsack machine in 1880. Created by James A. Bonsack, the
invention produced cigarettes at a rate that fast outperformed what a single skilled worker could
accomplish. Bonsack’s innovation first took root in Salem, Virginia in 1881, though some were
installed in European factories. Locally, Washington Duke bought and installed the invention en
“...the Dukes must have felt certain of the success of the machine by August, 1886, when
they installed five more in their Durham factory, thus making a total of fifteen in one
Coupled with the creation and patenting of a “slide box” by James B. Duke, W. Duke, Sons and
Company found a way to capitalize on a successful business model just as Standard Oil and U.S.
Steel had, bringing fame and further economic growth to the Durham area.
An Unforeseen Evil
Just as Rockefeller, Carnegie, and Morgan slowly fell from industrial greatness, James
B. Duke and his fellow members of the American Tobacco Company (the amalgamation of
twelve different tobacco businesses, including W. Duke, Sons and Company) experienced a stark
decline in sales in the 1960s. In 1964, Luther L. Terry, M.D., Surgeon General of the U.S. Public
Health Service, unveiled a dark secret hiding behind one of America’s, and North Carolina’s
most prominent industries. The so-called “Surgeon General Reports,” a collection of “more than
7,000 articles related to smoking and disease,” concluded that smoking cigarettes was a major
cause of lung cancer and chronic bronchitis for the American people. Throughout the rest of the
decade, laws enacted in 1965 and 1969 instituted that health warnings be posted on cigarette
containers, media could no longer publish cigarette-related advertisements, and that an annual
Durham Today
The American Tobacco Company rebranded itself in 1969, dissolving into four entities:
an eponymous business, Reynolds Tobacco Company, Liggett & Myers Tobacco Company, and
Lorillard Tobacco Company. (American Tobacco Company 1) The new American Tobacco
would leave Durham in the late 1980s, leaving behind the American Tobacco Historical District
and Brightleaf Square, locations that currently house a number of restaurants, businesses, and
shopping centers that operate in many of the same buildings which made the city famous. The
Durham Bulls Athletic Park, home of the Durham Bulls, takes its name from the Bull Durham
Tobacco Company. Additionally, the 1988 Bull Durham movie about the team includes popular
advertisements and products from the company’s history. Lastly, the “Tobacco Road” Rivalry
between Duke University and the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill refers to the eight
miles separating the two campuses and the tobacco fields that once surrounded the area,
reflecting on how two of the nation’s most elite institutions arose from humble beginnings.
Conclusion
Through what may arguably be referred to as accident, North Carolina experienced one
of its largest economic growths since the colonial era. Tobacco became the state’s cash crop for
much of the 19th and 20th centuries, calling sprawling cities like Durham home. For over a
century, millions of pounds of tobacco were put through advancing innovations to make
cigarettes and resulting products originating from the city’s factories were sold nationwide.
Publications such as Bright-Tobacco Industry tell the ascension to fame for businessmen such as
Washington and James Duke, along with others such as W.T. Blackwell and J.R. Green, who
Hall 7
recorded unparalleled profits that led to the betterment of Durham’s Duke University and the
research and academic study. Today, Durham’s agricultural history can be found all over the
city, telling the interesting story of the tobacco capital of North Carolina.
Hall 8
Works Cited
CDC. “History of the Surgeon General's Report on Smoking and Health.” Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 18 Dec. 2018,
www.cdc.gov/tobacco/data_statistics/sgr/history/index.htm.
af-tobacco.
POV. “North Carolina & Tobacco: Historical Background: Bright Leaves: POV: PBS.” North
archive.pov.org/brightleaves/historical-background/.
Tilley, N. M. The Bright-Tobacco Industry: 1860-1929. The University of North Carolina Press,
1948.
2019, en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Tobacco_Company.
www.nass.usda.gov/Statistics_by_State/North_Carolina/Publications/Annual_Statistical_B
ulletin/AgStat/Section05.pdf.