You are on page 1of 6

Hightemperature calorimeter for the measurement of vapor pressure and enthalpy of

vaporization
G. Natarajan and D. S. Viswanath

Citation: Review of Scientific Instruments 54, 1175 (1983); doi: 10.1063/1.1137545


View online: http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.1137545
View Table of Contents: http://scitation.aip.org/content/aip/journal/rsi/54/9?ver=pdfcov
Published by the AIP Publishing

Articles you may be interested in


High-pressure and high-temperature differential scanning calorimeter for combined pressure-concentration-
temperature measurements of hydrides
Rev. Sci. Instrum. 80, 095113 (2009); 10.1063/1.3233939

Development of an adiabatic calorimeter for simultaneous measurement of enthalpy and volume under high
pressure
Rev. Sci. Instrum. 69, 185 (1998); 10.1063/1.1148494

Highpressure hightemperature differential scanning calorimeter


Rev. Sci. Instrum. 53, 1079 (1982); 10.1063/1.1137092

Hightemperature battery calorimeter


Rev. Sci. Instrum. 53, 503 (1982); 10.1063/1.1136998

Calorimeter for the direct measurement of enthalpy of vaporization at high pressure and high temperature
Rev. Sci. Instrum. 53, 54 (1982); 10.1063/1.1136816

This article is copyrighted as indicated in the article. Reuse of AIP content is subject to the terms at: http://scitationnew.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded to IP:
155.33.16.124 On: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 18:02:19
High-temperature calorimeter for the measurement of vapor pressure and
enthalpy of vaporization
G. Natarajan and D. S. Viswanath
Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri 65211
(Received 7 December 1982; accepted for publication 24 May 1983)

An adiabatic calorimeter for the simultaneous measurement of enthalpies of vaporization and


vapor pressures of certain coal chemicals is described. The calorimeter was tested using benzene
for which accurate experimental data exists in the literature. Benzene is one of the substances
recommended by IUPAC as a reference substance for calorimetric studies. The uncertainty in the
benzene data is ± 5 J/mole in the temperature range of 350 K (very close to the boiling point) to
480 K (around 0.85 times the critical temperature). Both vapor pressure and enthalpies of
vaporization of benzene showed excellent agreement with the available literature data.
PACS numbers: 07.20.Fw, 51.30. + i, 65.50. + m, 64.70.Fx

INTRODUCTION its dew point T2 (in the case of a pure substance T, = T 2 ) can
be obtained using an apparatus as shown in Fig. 2. The path
Vapor pressure and enthalpies of vaporization are two im-
"abcd" in Fig. 1 shows that a cyclic process is necessary with
portant basic thermophysical properties useful in process de-
two major pieces of equipment operating at T, and T2 with a
sign. For the evaluation of other thermodynamic data such
condenser interposed between them to make the process
as second virial coefficients
thermally balanced and to achieve the equilibrium. In Fig. 2
B = (jjHvIT)(dT IdP) + VI - (RT IP), (I) the reservoir is at T and calorimeter at T2 which corre-
enthalpies of vaporization and vapor pressure data obtained " temperature.
sponds to the saturation
in a flow calorimeter offer a better alternative to PVT data
especially when adsorption effects become important. It is B. Description of the apparatus
also possible to evaluate saturated liquid and vapor volumes
The principal components of the apparatus are the res-
using the relations
ervoir, calorimeter, condenser, and the liquid meter.
PVg =RT+BP (2) The reservoir is a thick-walled cylindrical vessel made
and of 316 stainless steel and it contains 90% of the liquid. The
(3) vessel is designed to withstand a pressure of 100 bars in the
temperature range of 260--720 K. The reservoir is heated
In addition very few calorimetric and even vapor pressure
data are available for coal chemicals. Industrial processes
are generally carried out at pressures ranging from few bars PI ' 2
to 30-40 bars and the enthalpies of vaporization vary from CRITICAL
POINT
25 to 40 kJ/mole at 1 bar to zero at the critical pressure, the
critical pressure varying between 25 to 40 bars for most of
the substances. Thus, there is an urgent need for such data
both for process design and for testing theoretical models. .....
..J
C
...z:a::
I. APPARATUS AND PROCEDURE I&J

The experimental apparatus employed in the present


study is similar in functional details to the all-glass setup T, Tz
TEMPERATURE
used by Viswanath and co-workers. 1-4 The earlier design of
lei
Dana5 has been modified by several workers6-" and have
been used mainly for low-temperature work. The apparatus
can be used both for pure substances and mixtures.

A. Basic principles
X, X, X2
The vaporization process and the basis for the design of A 8
the apparatus can be seen from Fig. 1 which shows the P-T- CONCENTRATION
Ibl
x and H-T-x models for a completely miscible binary sys-
tem. The enthalpy difference between states a and c for a FIG. 1. Space model for binary phase equilibrium: (A T) triple point of A,
liquid at its bubble point T and the corresponding vapor at (Br) triple point ofB, (0) gas phase, and (L) liquid phase.
"
1175 Rev. Scl.lnstrum. 54 (9), September 19830034-6748/83/091175-05$01.30 © 1983 American Institute of Physics 1175

This article is copyrighted as indicated in the article. Reuse of AIP content is subject to the terms at: http://scitationnew.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded to IP:
155.33.16.124 On: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 18:02:19
HEISE -PRESSURE GAUGE

NITROGEN
CYLINDER

FIG. 2. Schematic diagram of the experi-


mental apparatus: (I to m) vapor line
heater, (m to n) calorimeter external
heater, (n to 0) reservoir heater, (D) dim-
10 TI
9 merstat, (VI) pressurizing valve, (V,) de-
compression valve, (V,) liquid purging
~ T2
valve, (IB) ice box, and (TW)
2
I thermowell.
4
3 V

MULTI-PIN
RECORDER

fLUKE - MULTIMETER
MODEL 8300 A

with an insulated nichrome heating coil (17.0 11 1m). The equilibrium over a short period of time and maintain the
energy input was regulated through dimmers tats and the condition over a longer period of time. This was achieved by
reservoir was lagged to minimize heat losses. Provision is a proper condenser of effective area 130 X lO-4 m2 and keep-
made to measure the temperature of the liquid using ing the coolant inlet temperature not too far (within 1~
thermowells. The physical dimensions of this vessel are: 15°C) from the condensing vapor temperature.
7.62-cm i.d. (lO.16-cm 0.d.)X9.525 cm. Temperatures were measured using NBS certified ther-
The calorimeter is a 6.35-cm-o.d. cylindrical vessel. mometers and copper-constantan thermocouples calibrated
The volume of the liquid in this 316 stainless-steel is approxi- according to IPTS-68. The accuracy of temperature mea-
mately 35 ml. The remaining part of the vessel volume, surement is ± lO mK. A high-precision Heise gauge cali-
2.223-cm i.d. X 16.50 cm, is occupied by the saturated vapor. brated against Amthor dead-weight gauge model 460 was
The thermowell provided with the vessel aids in monitoring used for pressure measurements. The Heise gauge had no
the saturation temperatures. A small heater made of 19-11 I hysteresis and there was a one-to-one correspondence
m nichrome wire and wound on a Teflon bobin is kept im- between the dead-weight gauge and the Heise gauge over the
mersed in the calorimeter liquid. The electrical connections entire range of ~ 1500 psig. The accuracy of the gauge is
for the internal heater are Conax connectors (supplied by better than ± 0.1 % of span and the pressures could be read
Conax Company, Buffalo, New York). Insulated nichrome to better than 0.5 psi using magnifying glass-vernier ar-
wire (17.011 1m) provided around the calorimeter keeps the rangement. The gauge itself is marked to 1 psi. With these
liquid at its saturation temperature and the internal heater the uncertainties in the pressure measurement are expected
supplied the energy for vaporization at this temperature. to be less than 6X lO-4 p.
The liquid meter is a glass vessel which siphons out the
calibrated volume precisely without any dripping. The liq- C. Procedure
uid meter was calibrated for volume using triple-distilled
mercury (impurity less than 1 ppm) and the calibration was The reservoir and the calorimeter were filled with 375
carried out from 24 to 140 .c. The volume of the liquid meter ml of pure compound. A cyclic operation of filling the high-
followed the relation pressure circuit with nitrogen and subsequently evacuating
it was carried out a few times. The apparatus was pressurized
to the experimental value using nitrogen. The external
v= Vo[1 + a(t - to)], (4)
heaters wound over the reservoir and the calorimeter (1711 I
m) heat the liquid. As the temperature increased nitrogen
where a = 0.000025 ·C- I , to = 24°C, and Vo = 4.8067 was purged periodically until near saturation conditions
± 0.0001 ml. A 316 stainless-steel vessel was used as a pro- were attained. In addition, the solubility of nitrogen in ben-
tective casing for the siphon vessel. Three windows provided zene has a negligible effect on the measurements. The heat
on the sides of the metal casing enabled easy viewing during input was controlled by "minitrol" controllers supplied by
the monitoring of evaporation rate. Glas-Col Co., Inc. The liquid supplied by gravity from the
It is essential to remove all the vapors formed in the reservoir to the calorimeter corresponds to the saturation
calorimeter and recycle it back to the reservoir as a liquid. temperature. The internal heater supplies the enthalpy of
This ensures absence of differential pressure in the closed vaporization to the liquid in the calorimeter. At steady state,
high-pressure circuit. This also enables the system to attain rate of evaporation was measured by condensing the vapor in

1176 Rev. Scl.lnstrum., Vol. 54, No.9, September 1983 High-temperature calorimeter 1176

This article is copyrighted as indicated in the article. Reuse of AIP content is subject to the terms at: http://scitationnew.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded to IP:
155.33.16.124 On: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 18:02:19
the condenser. The time (t) taken for the liquid to fill the 6

precalibrated volume (V) of the siphon vessel, the voltage (E ), (3) (5) (5)

and the current (I) passed through the internal heater were 4 (4)

used to evaluate enthalpies of vaporation:


(3)
(3) (3)
3
(LiB /kJ mole-I) = (E /V)(I / A)(t /s)(M)(10- ). (5)
" (p/g cm- 3 )(Vlem 3 ) '".,
>- 0
~ 350 400 450 50 o
The saturated liquid density of benzene from different z
c
sources 12- 20 were analyzed for the accuracy and used to ob- Ir -2
tain a density-temperature relation. The data fitted the '"uz
:::>
equation -4

(6)
-6

with an average absolute percent deviation of 0.26, where


Z = 0.26967 and the reduced temperature T, = (T /K)I TEMPERATURE (OK)
562.15.
The corrections that have to be made on the experimen- FIG. 3. Uncertainty in experimental data as a function of temperature for
tal LiB" values arise due to: benzene: (n) indicates number of data considered.
(i) Corrections for sensible heat: The temperatures T)
and T2 were controlled in such a manner that they corre-
sponded to the boiling temperature. It was also observed that a zero/negligible correction for heat loss.
for steady-state conditions, it was essential that the tempera- The accuracy in LiBv values due to the accuracy of the
tures T) and T2 are equal. This made the sensible heat correc- various measuring instruments is estimated to be 2 to 3 J/
tion negligible. mole. Data for benzene are reported in this paper. However,
(ii) Correction for unused internal heater resistance: If data collected for other substances, toluene, p-xylene, and
the full length of the internal heater was not completely im- tetralin, will be reported elsewhere. The uncertainty due to
mersed in the calorimeter liquid, the energy supplied to the random error for all the substances was less than ± 15 J/
heater should be proportionally scaled. The volume of the mole. Figure 3 shows the uncertainties in experimental data
initial feed liquid and the gravitational flow of liquid from for benzene.
the reservoir to the calorimeter ensured complete immersion
of the internal heater in the calorimeter before, during, and
after the evaporation process. Hence there was no correction II. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
from this source. The vapor pressure data of benzene is presented in Ta-
(iii) Correction for condensation of liquid in the vapor ble I. The data were compared with literature val-
line: This is estimated to be zero because of lagging of the ues. 12.13.20-22 Most of the published values are smoothed data
vapor lines, use of vapor line heaters, and continuous moni- and they deviate from one another within a range for average
toring of temperature and pressure which were perfectly absolute deviation of 0.12%-0.28%. The precision of our
constant at a particular value once the steady-state condi- work and hence the accuracy of our data are superior to the
tions were attained. earlier measurements. The data were fitted to polynomial
(iv) Correction for heat leakage: The calorimeter vol- equations of different order and the best fit by least-squares
ume, about 40 cm 3 , was small and there was no loss of mass technique resulted in
either from the calorimeter or from the system (flow calori-
meter with recycling of liquid to the reservoir without any 4

removal ofliquid or vapor from the apparatus). The amount In[(po/bars)lPcJ = 2:,AJ562.09/(TIK)-lr/2 , (7)
i=O
ofliquid vaporized from the calorimeter was instantaneous-
ly replenished by gravitational force from the liquid in the where Ao = - 4.12556, Al = 22.8275, A2 = - 49.6993,
reservoir. The liquid feed also assists a thorough mixing of A3 = 31.8597, andA4 = - 6.7767. The calculated values of
the small volume ofthe liquid in the calorimeter. The trans- po using Eq. (7) are presented in Table I along with the per-
port of vapor bubbles by the buoyancy effects from the sur- cent deviation from experimental values. Equation (7) fitted
face of the internal heater to the vapor-liquid interface also the experimental data with an average absolute deviation of
mixes the calorimeter liquid. Therefore, a uniform tempera- 0.28% and standard deviation of 0.02 bars. The value of Pc
ture was maintained all around the internal heater. The ca- used is 48.94 bars. In Table II the present data on enthalpy of
lorimeter liquid was surrounded by a metal wall with a tem- vaporization are compared with the published values. The
perature equal to the temperature of the liquid. This accurate work of Todd et al. 23 compared with our values
isothermal wall was insulated with 1.6 cm of asbestos (ther- within 0.41 to 0.57 per cent. The calculated values of Organ-
mal conductivity 0.113 Wm -'K -I) and 2.5 cm of glass wool ick and Studhalter24 using PVT data yields 0.79% average
(thermal conductivity 0.035 Wm-)K- 1). The calculated absolute percent deviation from our experimental values.
amount of heat transferred through the insulation suggested Our measured LiBv fit the equation

1177 Rev. ScI. Instrum., Vol. 54, No.9, September 1983 High-temperature calorimeter 1177

This article is copyrighted as indicated in the article. Reuse of AIP content is subject to the terms at: http://scitationnew.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded to IP:
155.33.16.124 On: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 18:02:19
TABLE I. Vapor pressure of benzene.

Temp. Expt.po Calc. po Bender et al. b Gornowski et al. C Glanville et al. d Kalafati et at.' Zmaczynski'
No. (K) (bar) (bar) %dev .. (bar) (bar) (bar) (bar) (bar)

351. 79 1.006 1.008 -0.22 0.971 0.963 0.956 0.980 0.963


2 360.46 1.282 1.279 0.23 1.260 1.254 1.239 1.275 1.258
3 365.66 1.483 1.472 0.73 1.463 1.457 1.438 1.438 1.462
4 371.61 1.714 1.724 -0.61 1.727 1.721 1.694 1.754 1.727
5 375.35 1.897 1.902 -0.26 1.910 1.905 1.873 1.942 1.911
6 376.95 1.981 1.983 -0.12 1.993 1.987 1.953 2.028 1.995
7 385.45 2.467 2.467 -0.02 2.481 2.473 2.427 2.531 2.486
8 393.99 3.057 3.054 0.10 3.059 3.046 2.989 3.127 3.067
9 399.25 3.482 3.471 0.31 3.463 3.446 3.382 3.543 3.469
10 406.25 4.106 4.099 0.16 4.062 4.037 3.964 4.161
II 419.75 5.533 5.567 -0.61 5.432 5.387 5.303 5.571
12 439.47 8.410 8.365 0.54 8.019 7.931 7.845 8.220
13 455.25 11.102 11.122 -0.18 10.667 10.540 10.455 10.913
14 459.07 11.826 11.840 -0.12 11.395 11.258 11.170 11.648
15 477.75 15.411 15.402 0.05 15.485 15.309 15.145 15.783
Average absolute deviation, 0.28%
Standard deviation (bar), 0.02

a%dev. = Expt. pO - calc. pO X 100.


Expt.p()
b Reference 20.
c Reference 12.
d Reference 13.

'Reference 21.
'Reference 22.

In [(.tJH"/kJ mole-I)] ed in Table II.


3 The good agreement of the experimental data with the
= IA,ln!562.09/[562.09-(TIK)]J'/3, (8) published values established the reliability of the data and
i=O
also the design of the apparatus employed. Our statistical
with Ao = 0.98407, A I = 7.81692, Az = - 7.18074, and analysis of the data yields a very low standard deviation 0.08
A, = 1.80504. kJ/mole, and it proves for the internal consistency of the
The least-squares regression estimate for this fit was an data collected. The uncertainty of data reported on .tJHv was
average absolute percent deviation of 0.22 and a standard estimated as recommended by IUPAC 27 and it is presented
deviation of 0.08 kJ/mole. The calculated .tJHv are present- as a function of temperature in Fig. 3.

TABLE II. Comparison of experimental AH v with literature values for benzene.

PVT
Temp. Expt.AHv Calc. AHv (kJ/mole) Literature AH v
No. (K) (kJ/mole) (kJ/mole) % dev. (Ref. 24) (kJ/mole) Ref.

351.79 30.831 30.928 -0.31 31.103

2 360.46 30.495 30.441 0.18 30.383


3 365.66 30.205 30.139 0.22 29.991 30.726 (353.24K) 23
4 371.61 29.868 29.785 0.28 29.568 29.255 (377.58K) 23
5 375.35 29.489 29.557 - 0.23 29.311
6 376.95 29.465 29.459 0.02 29.205 30.769 (353.15K) 25
7 385.45 28.851 28.925 -0.25 28.644 28.926 (383.15K) 25
8 393.99 28.552 28.369 0.64 28.090 25.983 (433.15K) 26
9 399.25 27.898 28.016 -0.43 27.747 23.258 (470.95K) 26
10 406.25 27.514 27.536 - 0.08 27.286
II 419.75 26.521 26.572 -0.19 26.362
12 439.47 25.071 25.069 0.01 24.900
13 455.25 23.846 23.778 0.28 23.614
14 459.07 23.436 23.453 - 0.07 23.286
15 477.75 21.766 21.782 - 0.07 21.590
Average absolute deviation, 0.22%
Standard deviation (kJ/mole), 0.08

1178 Rev. Sci.lnstrum., Vol. 54, No.9, September 1983 High-temperature calorimeter 1178

This article is copyrighted as indicated in the article. Reuse of AIP content is subject to the terms at: http://scitationnew.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded to IP:
155.33.16.124 On: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 18:02:19
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS "A. J. Barnard, S. P. Luthra, D. M. Newitt, and M. V. Pai, Proc. R. Soc.
London Ser. A 209, 143 (1959).
The authors thank the Research Council of the Univer- I2E. J. Gornowski, E. H. Amick, Jr., and A. N. Hixon, Ind. Eng. Chern. 39,
1348 (1947).
sity of Missouri-Columbia for partial support for this pro-
I3J. W. Glanville and B. H. Sage, Ind. Eng. Chern. 41, 1272 (1949).
ject and Bob Chaney for his help in the fabrication of the 14A. W. Carnpbel\ and R. M. Chatterjee, Can. J. Chern. 46,575 (1968).
apparatus. "A. W. Francis, Ind. Eng. Chern. 49,1779 (1957).
16J. M. Skaates and W. B. Kay, Chern. Eng. Sci. 19,431 (1964).
171. A. Tugarev, Z. I. Audus, and V. F. Nozdrew, Zh. Fiz. Khirn 49, 1256
(1975).
18International Critical Tables, edited by E. W. Washburn (McGraw-Hili,
New York, 1928), Vo\. III.
IU. R. Shettigar, D. S. Viswanath, and N. R. Kuloor, Proceedings ofthe 1st 19J. Tirnrnennans, Physico--Chemical Constants of Pure and Organic Com-
International Conference on Calorimetry and Thermodynamics /polish pounds (Elsevier, New York, 1950).
Scientific, Warsaw, 1966), p. 823. 20p. Bender, G. T. Furukawa, and J. R. Hyndrnann, Ind. Eng. Chern. 44,
2S. Sundaram and D. S. Viswanath, J. Chern. Eng. Data 21, 448 (1976). 387 (1952).
's. Sundaram and D. S. Viswanath, J. Chern. Eng. Data 23,621\978). 21D. D. Kalafati, D. S. Rasskazov, and E. K. Petrov, Zh. Fiz. Khirn. 41,
4S. Sundaram and D. S. Viswanath, J. Chern. Eng. Data 57, 233 (1979). 1357 (1967).
'L. I. Dana, Proc. Am. Acad. Arts Sci. 60, 241 (1925). 22A. Zrnaczynski, J. Chim. Phys. 27, 503 (1930).
6J. A. Tal\madge, P. W. Schroeder, W. C. Edmister, and L. N. Canjar, 23S. S. Todd, I. A. Hossenlopp, and D. W. Scott, J. Chern. Thennodyn. 10,
Chern. Eng. Progr. Symp. Ser. 50,137 (1954). 641 (1978).
7A. C. Plewes, D. A. Jardine, and R. M. Butler, Can. J. Techno\. 32,133 24E. I. Organick and W. R. Studhalter, Chern. Eng. Progr. 44, 847 (1948).
(1954). 25E. F. Fiock, D. C. Ginnings, and W. B. Holton, J. Res. Nat\. Bur. Stand. 6,
SA. C. Plewes, D. C. Pei, and R. K. Code, Can. J. Chern. Eng. 37, 121 881 (1931).
(1959). 2"T. S. Storvick and J. M. Smith, J. Chern. Eng. Data 5,133 (1960).
9F. P. Stein and J. J. Martin, Chern. Eng. Progr. Syrnp. Ser. 59, 112 (1963). 27G. Olofsson, S. Angus, G. T. Annstrong, and A. N. Kornilov, J. Chern.
lOA. C. Plewes, R. M. Butler, and K. Pugi, Can. J. Techno\. 34,152 (1956). Eng. Data 27, 221 (1982).

1179 Rev. Scl.lnstrum., Vol. 54, No.9, September 1983 High-temperature calorimeter 1179

This article is copyrighted as indicated in the article. Reuse of AIP content is subject to the terms at: http://scitationnew.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded to IP:
155.33.16.124 On: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 18:02:19

You might also like