Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CRR Yibal Khuf Rap Roject
CRR Yibal Khuf Rap Roject
for
Yibal Khuff Project FEED HRA
06.07.2013
by
Fourie, Natashia
Printed: 24/04/2014 Printed copies of this docume nt should be treated as information of te mpor ary value and destroyed after use
Page 2 of 74
Table of Contents
3. Remedial Actions____________________________________________________________________________________ 6
Printed: 24/04/2014 Printed copies of this docume nt should be treated as information of te mpor ary value and destroyed after use
Page 3 of 74
The report starts with a description of the scope of the HRA and the persons involved in sections 1 and 2.
The remedial actions from the HRA are pres ented in report section 3, and are sorted by priority. Section 4
provides information from the detailed appraisals. The focus here is on High and Medium RAM rated risks.
Section 5 provides an overview of generally applicable controls and recovery measures. Section 6 lists the
status of the Low RAM rated risks that were reviewed during the HRA. The report concludes with definitions
and a diagram of the RAM risk matrix in appendices 1 and 2. Appendix 3 contains an overview of the
detailed risk appraisals and their page numbers.
Blank cells in tables in the report indicate fields that are available for cont aining information, but are currently
IT
not populated in oneHealth .
1. HRA Scope
This is the Yibal Khuff (YK ) Project FEED HRA. This HRA does not cover the construction activities for the
facility. The purpose of the HRA is to identify high level potential health hazards associated with the YK
project and the controls necessary to manage health risks to ALARP once the project is in operational
phase. During FEED, there is an opportunity to assess the effectiveness of engineering controls in the
design, that when implemented, can reduce pers onal exposures to ALARP through the applic ation of the
hierarchy of controls. This report also identified areas that need to be re -assessed and these items are
captured as remedial action.
An HRA workshop was held in PDO FEED offices on the 16th and 23rd May 2013. With the input from the
attendees of this workshop, a high level health risk was prepared (attached to this HRA) which was used to
prepare this HRA.
The Yibal Khuff Sudair integrated project provides the opportunity to safely develop the Yibal Khuff/Sudair
reservoirs to realize synergy between the depletion of the Upper Khuff oil rim and its AG, and Khuff-5 and
Sudair NAG reservoirs. This development will add directly to PDO’s future oil production potential through
the development of an oil rim with S TOIIP of 127 mln m3, and through oil benefits that may be realised from
utilising the majority of the produced gas for power generation and EOR developments. The project is
strategic in nature, as the sweet export gas from gas -in-place volumes tot alling ~ 78 bln Sm3 will go t o
supporting Oman’s mid to long term gas supply requirements.
a. Production of sour oil & gas from the Upper Khuff Associated Gas (AG) reservoir and gas & condensat e
from the Lower Khuff and Sudair Non Associated Gas (NAG) reservoirs by means of an optimised integrated
depletion strategy.
b. Export of sweet gas to the Government Gas System to support Oman’s mid to long term gas demand and
PDO’s internal need for EOR projects and power generation.
c. Production of stabilised oil which is exported to the Main Oil Line (MOL) at Yibal A.
d. Produc ed water treatment and disposal by routing to the water injection and disposal system at Yibal A.
A new CPF location to the sout hwest of the Yibal field area.
Printed: 24/04/2014 Printed copies of this docume nt should be treated as information of te mpor ary value and destroyed after use
Page 4 of 74
47 well sites, each comprising the wellhead, Instrumented Over -pressure P rotection System
(IOPPS), choke valve, chemical injection skids, hydraulics package, wellhead control panel, Fire and
Gas detection and CCTV.
Each well site is tied back to one of three Remote Manifold Gathering Stations (RMS) through 6 inc h
GRE buried Flowlines.
Three new Remote Manifold Gathering Stations (RMS); West RMS located 11 km to the North West
of the Yibal Khuff CPF, E ast RMS located 12.4 km to the North E ast of the Yibal Khuff CPF and the
South RMS locat ed 7.5 km to the North-East of the new CPF location.
The West RMS will have 9 wells, the East RMS will have 17 wells and the South RMS will have 21
wells.
Each RMS will comprise production and test manifolds, a Multiphase Flow Meter (MPFM), chemical
injection skids, maintenance flare with combined flare and drains drum, pig launchers, control and
safeguarding panel, Fire and Gas detection and CCTV.
A single 11 km 14 inch buried carbon steel pipeline from the West RMS, a single 7.5 km 16 inc h
buried carbon steel pipeline from the South RMS, and dual 12.4 km 12 inch buried carbon pipelines
from the East RMS.
Printed: 24/04/2014 Printed copies of this docume nt should be treated as information of te mpor ary value and destroyed after use
Page 5 of 74
A single 9.7 km 16 inch buried CS Gas Export Pipeline from new YK -CPF to Yibal-GGP to be tied in
upstream of the existing 36 inch Government Gas Pipeline.
A single 11 km 8 inch buried CS Oil Export Pipeline from new YK-CPF to Yibal-A station, with tie-ins
at the existing dehydration tanks and downstream of the existing 16 inch MOL.
A single 10.4 km 8 inc h buried CS-PE lined Produc ed Water Export Pipeline from new YK-CPF to
Yibal-A station, with tie-in at the existing skim tanks.
2. HRA Team
Responsible for HRA: Fourie, Natashia
Input Provided By: Greg Hampson - HSE Advisor
PDO-HSE-FEE D
Safety Engineering
Production Chemist
Printed: 24/04/2014 Printed copies of this docume nt should be treated as information of te mpor ary value and destroyed after use
Page 6 of 74
3. Remedial Actions
Priority Work Area Hazard, RAM Rating and Scenario Recommended Remedial Action
Yibal Khuff Project FEED HRA Heat Stress / Hot Temperature Differentials Process design/equipment standards - Provide confirmation
Medium of a BA portable system. Complete (Updated BA
Philosophy and Safety Equipment Specification – Jan 31,
2014 GJH). Include MCOH BA Quality Specification.
All staff working on process facilities and near Written procedure/safe work practice - P rovide verification
flare has the pot ential risk of exposure to heat of how air quality and temperature of BA air will be
when working out doors, typical temperature regulated. MCOH Feb 15, 2014.
ranges being 32-40 degrees Celsius. Working Written procedure/safe work practice - Define the range of
with BA (breathing apparatus ) and confined climatic conditions for “normal”, “restricted” and no work
space entry work presents an additional risk under BA sets. Provide rule-set for working under SCBA/BA
factor due to the increased met abolic rate due in high temperatures (work rest regimen) Use the OGP
to PPE load. protocol – MCOH Feb 15, 2014. Compliment with SP-1231.
Administrative controls, such as area restrictions and limited
schedules - Define critical activities and conduct risk
assessment for use of BA sets. (1.) FTW protocol – MCOH
to provide, 2.) Review the S hell (Natashia), Harweel and
Kashagan procedures and provide guidance on
recommended good practice for YK and B IP – MCOH Feb
28, 2014.
Printed: 24/04/2014 Printed copies of this docume nt should be treated as information of te mpor ary value and destroyed after use
Page 7 of 74
Priority Work Area Hazard, RAM Rating and Scenario Recommended Remedial Action
Yibal Khuff Project FEED HRA Hydrogen sulfide containing streams with H2S Process design/equipment standards - Provide ALARP
> 1000 ppm mole (600 mg/kg) or >100 ppm demonstration for flanges above ground vs pits.
vapour space (7783-06-4) Written procedure/safe work practice - Confirm a respirator
Medium fit testing procedure. V erify fit testing program for persons
with facial hair. (MCOH to provide new procedure
Procedure addressing Quantitative and Qualititative
Mechanic al/instrument maintenance operat ors requirements for fit testing by March 31, 2014 ).
are potentially exposed to Hydrogen Sulfide
during normal operations and during invasive
maintenance. Exposure scenario's exists in
process streams (bot h operations and
maintenance); well pad works, well testing
(new wells), remote manifolds; leaks from
process equipment; oil stabilizer on export line
(H2S scavenger); spend dessicant from the
MSU and sampling.
Yibal Khuff Project FEED HRA Legionella bacteria (waterborne) Written procedure/safe work practice - Determine water
Medium treatment/equipment maintenance philosophy to reduce bio -
filming and scale prevention. (Legionella monitoring
program planned in PDO in 2014).
All staff (on plot and off plot) has the potential Process design/equipment standards - Confirm that the
to be exposed to the following Legionella design of potential water sources prevents aerosols, dead
sources: showers/ aerolised water, wat er from legs and stagnant water. FEED HSE to review and confirm
fire water systems, potable water, any scenario any issues by Jan 31, 2014.
where ambient temperature wat er may Written procedure/safe work practice - Identify and
become airborne and inhaled. document water systems and equipment that are a potential
source of Legionella; assess water systems and equipment
for the risk of Legionella and define a monitoring and control
programme. 1.) FEED HSE to identify any risks. 2.)
MCOH to work with P T HSE to provide appropriate control
measures for the risks identified – April 30, 2014.
Printed: 24/04/2014 Printed copies of this docume nt should be treated as information of te mpor ary value and destroyed after use
Page 8 of 74
Priority Work Area Hazard, RAM Rating and Scenario Recommended Remedial Action
Yibal Khuff Project FEED HRA Psychological Hazards and Stress Local Remedial Action - Implement entertainment and other
High facilities for long term shift staff in accommodations. P T-
OR&A – Closed - Entertainment facilities are provided at the
existing Yibal camp.
All staff (on and off plot ) have the potential to Written procedure/safe work practice - Confirm that PDO
experience isolation from family and friends, expectations for shift rotations and employee welfare
especially those on rotational duty; working on included in Contractor Agreements. PT – complete during
dead-lines, pressure owning to the nature of the Execute phas e.
the work environment is inherent. Administrative controls, such as area restrictions and limited
schedules - Confirm that a monitoring system is in place to
verify Contractor compliance to local Labour Law pertaining
to work cycle and annual leave. PT – complete during the
Execute phase.
Administrative controls, such as area restrictions and limited
schedules - Confirm a fatigue risk management program is
available for implementation covering HSE critical jobs.
MCOH to confirm forward strategy for fatigue management
in PDO and advise by Jan 31, 2014.
Printed: 24/04/2014 Printed copies of this docume nt should be treated as information of te mpor ary value and destroyed after use
Page 9 of 74
Priority Work Area Hazard, RAM Rating and Scenario Recommended Remedial Action
2 Yibal Khuff Project FEED HRA Sulfur dioxide- SO2 (7446-09-5) Local Remedial Action - FEE D HSE to verify that the
Medium Cont rol Room is in a safe location for toxic SO2 enduranc e
in accordance with PDO SP 1190. Open – MCOH, FEE D
HSE and P T HSE and P T Op’s to meet to review and agree
Potential exposure for all site staff during on the criteria – January 16, 2014.
flaring of gas cont aining H2S; Pouring of Sulfur Process design/equipment standards - Verify that
blocks; Liquid sulfur; Sulfur fires and Jet/pool observation ports on run down lines are included in design
fires. Operations and Maint enance staff have philosophy. Confirmed.
an increased risk of potential exposure to Process design/equipment standards - State what the
sources mentioned here. ALARP effort is in the event where the degasser does not
work efficiently (leading to inc reased potential for S O2 and
HS2 emissions during pouring operations). Provide PDO
occupational exposure criteria and environmental air quality
criteria. FEED HSE to complete by January 31, 2014.
Process design/ equipment standards - Demonstrate ALA RP
for the absorber by-pass to meet environment and
occupational tolerability criteria through the CA NSOLV
design. Confirmed. See CANS OLV Stack technical note.
Process design/ equipment standards - Verify provision of
dilution gas when flaring acid gas to complete the
combustion process and improve dispersion standards.
Confirmed.
4 Yibal Khuff Project FEED HRA Visible light (too much; too little) - wavelength Process design/equipment standards - Confirm design in
400 - 780 nm (non-ionizing radiation) accordance with HFE DEP’s and FEED Emergency
Low lightning guideline (GU/705). FEED HSE to Confirm by
90% Model.
Process design/equipment standards - HFE study to include
All staff are potentially expos ed to insufficient lessons learned from previously poorly designed Control
lighting and poor night time illumination of the Rooms in PDO facilities. FEED HSE to confirm by Jan 15,
plant and facilities. 2014.
Printed: 24/04/2014 Printed copies of this docume nt should be treated as information of te mpor ary value and destroyed after use
Page 10 of 74
Priority Work Area Hazard, RAM Rating and Scenario Recommended Remedial Action
TB D Yibal Khuff Project FEED HRA Air pollution (environmental health hazard) Monitoring: other measurements - Verify whether ongoing
Low fugitive emissions monitoring programs will be implemented.
1.) MCOH t o advise whether the risk should be increased t o
“M” basis recent developments with exposure to diesel
Potentially impacted staff are on-plot and engine exhaust. Also advise on monitoring program
maintenance staff who work around flues with planned in PDO – January 31, 2014. 2.) FEED HSE to
incinerators; working on plat forms with poor update HRA with inputs from MCOH. 3.) P T HSE to con firm
ventilation. Other sources are process leak environmental monitoring requirements for the new facilities.
sources/ valves/flanges etc. 4.) P T HSE to confirm any requirements for Fugitive
Emissions monitoring and any design implications –
clarification of SP-1005 requirement. Update IA as
required.
TB D Yibal Khuff Project FEED HRA Amines [e.g., Ethylenediamine (1,2- Hazard identification by signs/warnings/labels - Include in
Diaminoethane), methylamine, diethylamine, chemical approval process (CAP). Develop and implement
mono-, di-, and tri-ethanolamine ] a SHOC card. MCOH – verify existence of SHOC card for
Medium amines. Develop as required – January 31, 2014.
Printed: 24/04/2014 Printed copies of this docume nt should be treated as information of te mpor ary value and destroyed after use
Page 11 of 74
Priority Work Area Hazard, RAM Rating and Scenario Recommended Remedial Action
TB D Yibal Khuff Project FEED HRA Freon (HCFC) Process design/equipment standards - Verify that the
Low cooling system that uses direct process cooling will be
protected with passive fire prot ection where required (during
the passive fire protection study). FEED HSE to verify –
Production Operators and Maintenanc e staffs reference study from RHI.
have a potential to exposure to Cont ainment / Isolation - Verify that the process for initial fill
Tetrafluoroethane (R134a) in the chilling and (first fill) will reduce frequency of connection between bottles
cooling system. Tet rafluoroethane is a and connection point. PT OR&A\CP – confirm ability to
colorless gas with a slight ethereal odor. procure R134A in bulk containers – End of FEED.
Vapors are heavier than air. Vapors can
replace the available oxygen. V apors may
cause dizziness or asphyxiation without
warning. Vapors from liquefied gas are initially
heavier than air and spread along ground.
Cont act with gas or liquefied gas may cause
burns, severe injury and/or frostbite. Fire may
produce irritating, corrosive and/or toxic gases.
TB D Yibal Khuff Project FEED HRA Hydrazine and compounds (302-01-2) Substitution - Identify a safer option for hy drazine.
Medium Hydrazine has been removed and replaced wit h
Diethylhydroxyl amine (DE HA).
Printed: 24/04/2014 Printed copies of this docume nt should be treated as information of te mpor ary value and destroyed after use
Page 12 of 74
Priority Work Area Hazard, RAM Rating and Scenario Recommended Remedial Action
TB D Yibal Khuff Project FEED HRA Manual Handling - Lifting, Lowering Process design/equipment standards - Confirm that design
Medium include HFE DEP 30.00.60. 10. FEED HSE by 90% PDMS
Review.
Process design/equipment standards - Confirm that 3D
Operators, Maintenance and Technicians are model reviews are carried out for outdoor installations to
required to move materials, open and close identify and address ergonomic issues. Confirmed.
valves and manually manipulate controls. Process design/equipment standards - Confirm that ALARP
DEP (all of HSE critical tasks) are completed. FEE D HSE –
90% PDMS.
Local Remedial Action - Confirm that mechanical handling
exercise is initiated. FEE D Piping will produce a
Mechanic al Handling Report – 90% PDMS Review.
Process design/ equipment standards - Confirm that access
to valves and sampling points are included during HFE
screening – part of model review. Confirmed. Referenc e
FEED HFE Study reports.
Process design/equipment standards - Confirm that
modeling will be completed to verify adequate space for
lifting devices such as mobile cranes, lift-out pumps and
heavy items. 1.) FEED Piping to provide Mechanical
Handling report – 90% PDMS Review.
TB D Yibal Khuff Project FEED HRA Sulfur Process design/equipment standards - Verify that
Low observation ports on run down lines are included in design
(for liquid sulfur molten). Confirmed. 1.) Confirm
availability of a S HOC for sulfur.
Production Operators, Maintenance Staff and
Cont ractors (for sulfur handling) are pot entially
exposed to liquid molt en sulfur in the sulfur
recovery unit, sulfur handling area, leaks from
CPF (increased burns from molten sulfur) and
during over-pressure events in the liquid sulfur
storage tanks with loss of containment.
Cont ractors (sulfur handling) are pot entially
exposed to solid sulfur in the blocking plant
and CPF.
Printed: 24/04/2014 Printed copies of this docume nt should be treated as information of te mpor ary value and destroyed after use
Page 13 of 74
Priority Work Area Hazard, RAM Rating and Scenario Recommended Remedial Action
TB D Yibal Khuff Project FEED HRA General Administrative controls, such as area restrictions and limited
schedules - Site verification is required to finalize the
effectiveness of controls, recovery measures and final
exposure ratings mentioned in this HRA. 1.) PT-HSE -
Exposure ratings will be developed during the Execute
Phase when the task details become available.
Emergency / safety showers - S elect safety showers/eye
wash stations that have the capability to cool water during
summer period. 1.) P T-HSE to confirm requirements. 2.)
FEED HSE to develop safety equipment specific ation for
Safety Showers. (FEED HSE to confirm requirement for
eye wash stations at wells and RMS.)
Printed: 24/04/2014 Printed copies of this docume nt should be treated as information of te mpor ary value and destroyed after use
Page 14 of 74
Exposure Limit
Exposure Rating &
Justi fication
ALARP Status Assessment incomplete
ALARP Justification
Control s Effectivene ss
Printed: 24/04/2014 Printed copies of this docume nt should be treated as information of te mpor ary value and destroyed after use
Page 15 of 74
Acute Potential Health Moderate/severe irritant to skin, eye and respirat ory tract; absorbed through skin
Effects RAM: 3B
Chronic Potential Health Skin & respiratory sensitizer; repeated overex posure may produce liver, kidney
Effects damage
RAM: 3C
Scenario Production operators and maint enance staff are potentially exposed to Amines
during maintenance, loading of new materi al and unloading of spent material in
the CANS OLV (novel), AGRU and AGEA (MDEA) units. Rich amines are
considered sour and can contain H2S and SO2.
Route & Form of Dermal, Inhalation
Exposure Liquid
Frequency & Duration of Variable
Exposure 1 - 2 hours
Exposure Limit
Exposure Rating &
Justi fication
ALARP Status Assessment incomplete
ALARP Justification
Control s Effectivene ss
PPE-Other - Fixed BA system for routine maintenance activities.
Recovery Measure s Effectivene ss
Printed: 24/04/2014 Printed copies of this docume nt should be treated as information of te mpor ary value and destroyed after use
Page 16 of 74
Acute Potential Health Effects will be substance specific and will require confirmation for chemical
Effects species
RAM: 1B
Chronic Potential Health None known
Effects RAM:
Scenario Maintenance operators have potential exposure scenarios during maintenance
tasks on the CANSOLV and AGRU units.
Route & Form of Dermal, Inhalation
Exposure Liquid
Frequency & Duration of Variable
Exposure 2 - 4 hours
Exposure Limit
Exposure Rating &
Justi fication
ALARP Status Assessment incomplete
ALARP Justification
Control s Effectivene ss
Local Control - ALARP demonstration (controls) the same as for Corrosion and Scale
Inhibitors.
Recovery Measure s Effectivene ss
Printed: 24/04/2014 Printed copies of this docume nt should be treated as information of te mpor ary value and destroyed after use
Page 17 of 74
Acute Potential Health Effects blood , resulting in carboxyhaemoglobinemia and cardiac disorders . Can
Effects be fatal.
RAM: 4B
Chronic Potential Health EU Risk Category 1 Teratogen, may cause harm to unborn child.
Effects RAM: 4B
Scenario All on-plot staffs have potential for exposure through gas turbine generat ors,
power boilers, regen gas heater, combustion sources, trenching and confined
space entry.
Route & Form of Inhalation
Exposure Gas
Frequency & Duration of Variable
Exposure 1 - 2 hours
Exposure Limit
Exposure Rating &
Justi fication
ALARP Status Assessment incomplete
ALARP Justification
Control s Effectivene ss
Printed: 24/04/2014 Printed copies of this docume nt should be treated as information of te mpor ary value and destroyed after use
Page 18 of 74
Acute Potential Health Mechanic al irritation to eyes, skin, and respiratory tract
Effects RAM: 1B
Chronic Potential Health None known
Effects RAM:
Scenario Production Operators/Assistants and Maintenance staffs has potential for
exposure during work on the sulfur recovery units.
Route & Form of Inhalation
Exposure Dust / Particulate
Frequency & Duration of Variable
Exposure 2 - 4 hours
Exposure Limit
Exposure Rating &
Justi fication
ALARP Status Assessment incomplete
ALARP Justification
Control s Effectivene ss
Printed: 24/04/2014 Printed copies of this docume nt should be treated as information of te mpor ary value and destroyed after use
Page 19 of 74
Acute Potential Health Irritant to skin and eyes. Respiratory irritant, may cause pulmonary edema
Effects RAM: 2C
Chronic Potential Health None known
Effects RAM:
Scenario Maintenance Operators have a potential ex posure scenario during work on
CANSOLV unit caustic polishing and SO2 abs orbent unit.
Route & Form of Dermal, Inhalation
Exposure Liquid
Frequency & Duration of Variable
Exposure 2 - 4 hours
Exposure Limit
Exposure Rating &
Justi fication
ALARP Status Assessment incomplete
ALARP Justification
Control s Effectivene ss
Local Control - ALARP demonstration (controls) the same as for Corrosion and Scale
Inhibitors.
Recovery Measure s Effectivene ss
Printed: 24/04/2014 Printed copies of this docume nt should be treated as information of te mpor ary value and destroyed after use
Page 20 of 74
Acute Potential Health Irritation of eyes, skin and respirat ory system
Effects RAM: 2B
Chronic Potential Health Possible tooth erosion
Effects RAM: 3A
Scenario Potential exposure exists for any person entering the water treatment plant
(DEMIN water) and IBC's (storage).
Route & Form of Dermal, Inhalation
Exposure Liquid
Frequency & Duration of Variable
Exposure 1 - 2 hours
Exposure Limit
Exposure Rating &
Justi fication
ALARP Status Assessment incomplete
ALARP Justification
Control s Effectivene ss
Process design/equipment standards - Chemical warehouse designed to accommodate
separation of incompatible materials.
Administrative controls, such as area restrictions and limited schedules - A chemical
compatibility study was undertaken.
Local Control - Reduced manual handling (large cont ainers vs. smaller containers).
Recovery Measure s Effectivene ss
Printed: 24/04/2014 Printed copies of this docume nt should be treated as information of te mpor ary value and destroyed after use
Page 21 of 74
Acute Potential Health Corrosive to skin, eyes and res piratory tract. Can cause kidney failure, brain
Effects damage or blindness.
RAM: 3B
Chronic Potential Health Defatting of the skin, dermatitis. Effects on CNS.
Effects RAM: 2B
Scenario Maintenance staffs, Production Operators and Truck Drivers are potentially
exposed in the following work areas: Chemical storage (facilities), chemical
injection skids, injection pumps, offloading facilities, lines (marked), CPF, well
heads and RMS. Demulsifier (P T3265) - skid package (Upstream) and RMS.
Route & Form of Dermal
Exposure Liquid
Frequency & Duration of Variable
Exposure 2 - 4 hours
Exposure Limit
Exposure Rating &
Justi fication
ALARP Status Assessment incomplete
ALARP Justification
Control s Effectivene ss
Written procedure/safe work practice - Chemical approval procedure (CAP) in place with
chemical compatibility study.
Process design/equipment standards - Allocated chemical storage areas.
Cont ainment / Isolation - Storage areas are designed to be shaded, bunded and have an
appropriate slope towards rain.
Process design/equipment standards - Fittings/couplings designed for chemicals.
Hazard identification by signs/warnings/labels - PDO requires SHOC cards to be available
and displayed where product is stored.
Recovery Measure s Effectivene ss
Emergency / safety showers - Safety shower/eye wash stations in facility design where a
risk of splash/spill has been identified.
Remedial Actions Priority
Printed: 24/04/2014 Printed copies of this docume nt should be treated as information of te mpor ary value and destroyed after use
Page 22 of 74
Printed: 24/04/2014 Printed copies of this docume nt should be treated as information of te mpor ary value and destroyed after use
Page 23 of 74
Acute Potential Health Food poisoning; hepatitis A, amoebic dysentery, giardiasis, typhoid, cholera
Effects RAM: 3C
Chronic Potential Health Carrier of disease without having symptoms
Effects RAM:
Scenario Food and/or drinking water is handled and provided to staff.
Route & Form of Ingestion
Exposure Other
Frequency & Duration of 3 x Daily
Exposure 2 - 4 hours
Exposure Limit
Exposure Rating &
Justi fication
ALARP Status Assessment incomplete
ALARP Justification Site verification of cont rols and recovery measures required
Control s Effectivene ss
Written procedure/safe work practice - A Catering Contractor will be selected based on
having a food safety management system (FSMS) aligned with HA CCP. The Catering
contract will include requirements for Good Hygiene P ractices and Hazard Analysis
Critical Control Point, as is the practice in PDO.
Audits and Inspections - FSMS audited internally and SME's to conduct external audits.
Process design/equipment standards - Dedicated food preparation and eating facilities as
part of catering approval process. Food handling facilities are planned, designed and
constructed meeting local and international best practices (aligned with PDO catering
requirements).
Vector control measures - Effective pest control and sanit ation programs.
Fitness to Work - Fitness to Work protocols implemented for food handlers meeting
country specific or Shell Health protocols (whichever is more stringent).
Recovery Measure s Effectivene ss
Printed: 24/04/2014 Printed copies of this docume nt should be treated as information of te mpor ary value and destroyed after use
Page 24 of 74
Acute Potential Health Asphyxiant (for RAM see Simple Asphyxiant), frostbite, cardiac effects, forms
Effects Phosgene if ignited
RAM: 2B
Chronic Potential Health None known
Effects RAM:
Scenario Production Operators and Maint enance staffs have a potential to exposure to
Tetrafluoroethane (R134a) in the chilling and cooling system. Tetrafluoroethane
is a colorless gas with a slight ethereal odor. Vapors are heavier than air. Vapors
can replace the available oxygen. Vapors may cause dizziness or as phyxiation
without warning. Vapors from liquefied gas are initially heavier than air and
spread along ground. Contact with gas or liquefied gas may cause burns, severe
injury and/or frostbite. Fire may produce irritating, corrosive and/ or toxic gases.
Route & Form of Dermal, Inhalation
Exposure Liquid
Frequency & Duration of Variable
Exposure 1 - 2 hours
Exposure Limit
Exposure Rating &
Justi fication
ALARP Status Assessment incomplete
ALARP Justification
Control s Effectivene ss
Process design/equipment standards - Closed loop system. The design allows for an
indirect chilling of the process with water to prevent potential for fire impacting onto the
refrigerant system. This reduc es the potential for hydrofluoric acid release.
Process design/equipment standards - Design accommodates recovery of refrigerant
during turn-around activities (no venting).
Recovery Measure s Effectivene ss
Printed: 24/04/2014 Printed copies of this docume nt should be treated as information of te mpor ary value and destroyed after use
Page 25 of 74
Printed: 24/04/2014 Printed copies of this docume nt should be treated as information of te mpor ary value and destroyed after use
Page 26 of 74
Acute Potential Health Heat stroke leading to death (lesser symptoms: exhaustion, cramps, ras h,
Effects fatigue)
RAM: 4B
Chronic Potential Health Dermatitis
Effects RAM: 2C
Scenario All staff working on process facilities and near flare has the potential risk of
exposure to heat when working outdoors, typical temperature ranges being 32-
40 degrees Celsius. Working with BA (breathing apparat us) and confined space
entry work presents an additional risk factor due to the inc reased metabolic rate
due to PPE load.
Route & Form of
Exposure
Frequency & Duration of Daily
Exposure > 12 hours
Exposure Limit
Exposure Rating &
Justi fication
ALARP Status Assessment incomplete
ALARP Justification Site verification of cont rols and recovery measures required
Control s Effectivene ss
Process design/equipment standards - Air temperature of BA air is regulated by
underground piping.
Process design/equipment standards - Design makes provision for separate resting areas
with AC and fresh, cool water supply (Sulfur Blocking area and FA R buildings).
Fitness to Work - Medical fitness to work standards has been established for users of BA
sets.
Training and information on hazard - Processes and procedures in place for effective
supervision.
Administrative controls, such as area restrictions and limited schedules - Provisions made
for shaded areas and cool drinking wat er. Offices with A C are available on plot, for
example the Central Control Room.
Recovery Measure s Effectivene ss
Printed: 24/04/2014 Printed copies of this docume nt should be treated as information of te mpor ary value and destroyed after use
Page 27 of 74
Printed: 24/04/2014 Printed copies of this docume nt should be treated as information of te mpor ary value and destroyed after use
Page 28 of 74
Printed: 24/04/2014 Printed copies of this docume nt should be treated as information of te mpor ary value and destroyed after use
Page 29 of 74
Acute Potential Health Corrosive to skin, eyes and res piratory system. Can be fatal by inhalation or
Effects skin absorbtion. Can effect liver, kidney or CNS.
RAM: 4B
Chronic Potential Health Possibly carcinogenic to humans (IA RC 2B ), skin sensitizer, suspect mutagen,
Effects damage to liver,kidney and CNS.
RAM: 4B
Scenario Hydrazine and Ammonium Bisulphate is used as oxygen scavengers.
Production Operators and Maint enance staff have the potential for exposure in
the following areas: IBC's (storage area), waste water treatment plant and the
outlet of the sour water stripper.
Route & Form of Dermal, Inhalation, Splash
Exposure Liquid
Frequency & Duration of Variable
Exposure 1 - 2 hours
Exposure Limit
Exposure Rating &
Justi fication
ALARP Status Assessment incomplete
ALARP Justification
Control s Effectivene ss
Written procedure/safe work practice - Chemical approval procedure (CAP) in place with
chemical compatibility study.
Hazard identification by signs/warnings/labels - PDO requires SHOC cards to be available
and displayed where product is stored.
Cont ainment / Isolation - Storage areas are designed to be shaded, bunded and have an
appropriate slope towards rain.
Process design/equipment standards - Fittings/couplings designed for chemicals.
Allocated chemical storage areas.
Recovery Measure s Effectivene ss
Printed: 24/04/2014 Printed copies of this docume nt should be treated as information of te mpor ary value and destroyed after use
Page 30 of 74
Acute Potential Health Asphyxiant (for RAM see Simple Asphyxiant), headaches, giddiness, nausea,
Effects cold burns from liquefied gas
RAM: 2B
Chronic Potential Health None known
Effects RAM: 1A
Scenario Potential exposure to Methane exists for Production Operators working in
production facilities.
Route & Form of Inhalation
Exposure Gas
Frequency & Duration of Variable
Exposure 2 - 4 hours
Exposure Limit
Exposure Rating &
Justi fication
ALARP Status Assessment incomplete
ALARP Justification
Control s Effectivene ss
Leak det ection & repair surveys - Potential leak sourc es identified in design proc ess.
Process design/equipment standards - Equipment and lines labeled in design process.
Ventilation-General dilution - Natural ventilation considered in design process, where
mechanic al ventilation is not practicable due to facility layout that prefers no enclosed
spaces.
Process design/equipment standards - Sampling points - close system design in
accordance with P R 1096.
Recovery Measure s Effectivene ss
Printed: 24/04/2014 Printed copies of this docume nt should be treated as information of te mpor ary value and destroyed after use
Page 31 of 74
Acute Potential Health Narc otic effect, CNS depression, irritant to eyes and respirat ory tract.
Effects RAM: 2B
Chronic Potential Health Effects on liver, kidney and CNS, peripheral neuropathy.
Effects RAM: 3B
Scenario Production and Maintenance staff has potential exposure to hydrocarbons (in
various concentrations) throughout production facilities.
Route & Form of Inhalation
Exposure Vapour
Frequency & Duration of Variable
Exposure 2 - 4 hours
Exposure Limit
Exposure Rating &
Justi fication
ALARP Status Assessment incomplete
ALARP Justification
Control s Effectivene ss
Process design/equipment standards - Sampling points - close system design in
accordance with P R 1096.
Recovery Measure s Effectivene ss
Printed: 24/04/2014 Printed copies of this docume nt should be treated as information of te mpor ary value and destroyed after use
Page 32 of 74
Acute Potential Health Corrosive to skin and ey es. Respiratory irritant, may cause pulmonary edema
Effects RAM: 4B
Chronic Potential Health Impairment of lung function, tooth erosion
Effects RAM: 2B
Scenario RO Plant Operator(s) have potential expos ure scenarios when working
in/around the sour water stripper and RO plant for PH adjustment, IBC's storage.
Route & Form of Dermal, Inhalation
Exposure Liquid
Frequency & Duration of Variable
Exposure 1 - 2 hours
Exposure Limit
Exposure Rating &
Justi fication
ALARP Status Assessment incomplete
ALARP Justification
Control s Effectivene ss
Process design/equipment standards - Chemical warehouse designed to accommodate
separation of incompatible materials.
Administrative controls, such as area restrictions and limited schedules - A chemical
compatibility study was undertaken.
Local Control - Reduced manual handling (large cont ainers vs. smaller containers).
Recovery Measure s Effectivene ss
Printed: 24/04/2014 Printed copies of this docume nt should be treated as information of te mpor ary value and destroyed after use
Page 33 of 74
Hazard Hydrogen sulfide containing streams with H2S > 1000 ppm mole (600
mg/kg) or >100 ppm vapour space (7783-06-4)
RAM: Medium
Acute Potential Health Chemical asphyxiant causing respiratory paralysis, irritant; unconsciousness,
Effects fatality
RAM: 4C
Chronic Potential Health Damage to nasal tissues.
Effects RAM: 2B
Scenario Mechanic al/instrument maintenanc e operators are potentially exposed to
Hydrogen Sulfide during normal operations and during invasive maintenance.
Exposure scenario's exists in process streams (both operations and
maintenance); well pad works, well testing (new wells), remote manifolds; leaks
from process equipment; oil stabilizer on export line (H2S scavenger); spend
dessicant from the MSU and sampling.
Route & Form of Inhalation
Exposure Gas
Frequency & Duration of Variable
Exposure > 12 hours
Exposure Limit
Exposure Rating &
Justi fication
ALARP Status Assessment incomplete
ALARP Justification Site verification of cont rols and recovery measures required
Control s Effectivene ss
Local Control - PDO occupational exposure criteria and environmental air quality criteria
established.
Process design/equipment standards - Fixed BA system for routine maintenance activities
in the sour system.
Process design/equipment standards - Design uses mechanical seals on pumps and dry
gas seals on sour gas compressors.
Leak det ection & repair surveys - Leak sources are minimized through leak pat h
reduction.
Monitoring: Other measurements - H2S detectors and warning system strategically
positioned throughout the facility for easy gas detection leaks (TLV 5ppm).
Process design/equipment standards - No atmosphere relief valve to atmosphere in sour
surface.
Hazard identification by signs/warnings/labels - Signs and labeling in accordance with
PDO SP 1284, SP 1166 and HFE DEP 30 00 60 21.
Process design/equipment standards - Instrument vents in sour service are to the LP flare
or to safe location.
Process design/equipment standards - Sampling points are designed to facilitate close
system sampling in accordance wit h PDO PR 1096.
Local Control - Purging proc edure using sweet gas prior to dumping spent dessicant from
the MSU.
Process design/equipment standards - Degassing unit removes H2S.
Recovery Measure s Effectivene ss
Emergency response procedures - Emergency escape provisions included in facility
design.
Remedial Actions Priority
Process design/equipment standards - Provide ALARP demonstration for flanges above
ground vs pits.
Written procedure/safe work practice - Confirm a res pirat or fit testing procedure. Verify fit
testing program for persons wit h facial hair.
Printed: 24/04/2014 Printed copies of this docume nt should be treated as information of te mpor ary value and destroyed after use
Page 34 of 74
Acute Potential Health Mechanic al irritation of eyes skin and respiratory tract from dust
Effects RAM: 1B
Chronic Potential Health Effects on lung function
Effects RAM: 2B
Scenario Potential exposure exists for Maintenance staff during routine maint enance as
iron sulfide may accumulate in plant. Secondary exposure scenario exists
during pigging.
Route & Form of Inhalation
Exposure Dust / Particulate
Frequency & Duration of Variable
Exposure 2 - 4 hours
Exposure Limit
Exposure Rating &
Justi fication
ALARP Status Assessment incomplete
ALARP Justification
Control s Effectivene ss
Process design/equipment standards - Extensive amount of CRA (corrosion resistant
alloy) in on-plot design and GRE (glass re-enforced epoxy) piping for the flow lines.
Recovery Measure s Effectivene ss
Printed: 24/04/2014 Printed copies of this docume nt should be treated as information of te mpor ary value and destroyed after use
Page 35 of 74
Acute Potential Health Pontiac fever (mildest form of infection); Legionairres ' disease - pneumonia
Effects (severest form of infection - may be fatal)
RAM: 4B
Chronic Potential Health Effects on lung function
Effects RAM: 3B
Scenario All staff (on plot and off plot) has the potential to be exposed to the following
Legionella sourc es: showers/ aerolised water, water from fire water systems,
potable water, any scenario where ambient temperature water may become
airborne and inhaled.
Route & Form of Inhalation
Exposure Other
Frequency & Duration of Variable
Exposure 8 - 12 hours
Exposure Limit
Exposure Rating &
Justi fication
ALARP Status Assessment incomplete
ALARP Justification Site verification of cont rols and recovery measures required
Control s Effectivene ss
Written procedure/safe work practice - PDO Legionella management procedure is in
place, ready for implement ation. The procedure requires that water systems and
equipment that are a potential source of Legionella are identified, documented, assessed
and a monitoring and control program defined.
Recovery Measure s Effectivene ss
Printed: 24/04/2014 Printed copies of this docume nt should be treated as information of te mpor ary value and destroyed after use
Page 36 of 74
Printed: 24/04/2014 Printed copies of this docume nt should be treated as information of te mpor ary value and destroyed after use
Page 37 of 74
Printed: 24/04/2014 Printed copies of this docume nt should be treated as information of te mpor ary value and destroyed after use
Page 38 of 74
Printed: 24/04/2014 Printed copies of this docume nt should be treated as information of te mpor ary value and destroyed after use
Page 39 of 74
Acute Potential Health Irritation of the eyes and respiratory tract, CNS depression
Effects RAM: 2C
Chronic Potential Health Human carcinogen (IARC 1), damage to bone marrow and immune system,
Effects dermatitis.
RAM: 4B
Scenario Production operators and maint enance staffs (of crude and condensate handling
systems) are potentially exposed to these sources: All off-plot production
gathering facilities; inlet separation (Unit 30); condensate stabilization plant (Unit
33); LP separation (Unit 31); oil storage and pumping (Unit 34) and during
sampling and analysis.
Route & Form of Dermal, Inhalation
Exposure Liquid
Frequency & Duration of Variable
Exposure 1 - 2 hours
Exposure Limit
Exposure Rating &
Justi fication
ALARP Status Assessment incomplete
ALARP Justification
Control s Effectivene ss
Process design/equipment standards - Good engineering design practice in accordance
with CP117, GU611, SP 1190 and SP 1078. Lab design completed in accordance with
DEP 34 17 10 31. The design of sampling equipment and sampling points to minimize
personal exposure risks.
Hazard identification by signs/warnings/labels - Equipment and lines labeled in
accordance with SP 1284, SP 1166 and DEP 30 00 60 21.
Ventilation-General dilution - Natural ventilation.
Recovery Measure s Effectivene ss
Printed: 24/04/2014 Printed copies of this docume nt should be treated as information of te mpor ary value and destroyed after use
Page 40 of 74
Printed: 24/04/2014 Printed copies of this docume nt should be treated as information of te mpor ary value and destroyed after use
Page 41 of 74
Hazard Noi se
RAM: Medium
Acute Potential Health Loud steady noise: temporary thres hold shift. Impact noise: rupture of eardrum;
Effects acoustic trauma.
RAM: 2C
Chronic Potential Health Noise induced hearing loss (permanent threshold shift); tinnitus (ringing in ears)
Effects RAM: 2D
Scenario All staff working on process facilities has the potential for exposure to plant noise
and equipment. Potential sources of noise in process facilities include noisy
plant (e. g. air coolers, heaters, flare etc) and noisy equipment (e.g. chemical
injection pumps, transfer pumps etc).
Route & Form of
Exposure
Frequency & Duration of Variable
Exposure 2 - 4 hours
Exposure Limit
Exposure Rating &
Justi fication
ALARP Status Assessment incomplete
ALARP Justification Site verification of cont rols and recovery measures required
Control s Effectivene ss
Process design/equipment standards - Predictive nois e modeling during FEED.
Process design/equipment standards - Equipment sourced for emissions lower than
85dB (A) - included in the equipment BID data sheets.
Noise silencer / Muffler / Damper - Silencers on air vents and deaerator and let down
valves.
Process design/equipment standards - Noise criteria (base of flare) DEP 80.45. 10.10
followed.
Recovery Measure s Effectivene ss
E vent -based: IH monitoring - Noise mapping during commission - Company hearing
conservation plan implemented for areas exceeding 85dB (A).
Remedial Actions Priority
Printed: 24/04/2014 Printed copies of this docume nt should be treated as information of te mpor ary value and destroyed after use
Page 42 of 74
Printed: 24/04/2014 Printed copies of this docume nt should be treated as information of te mpor ary value and destroyed after use
Page 43 of 74
Acute Potential Health Stress symptoms like headaches, high blood pressure, sleep disturbanc e,
Effects irritability
RAM: 2D
Chronic Potential Health Anxiety, depression, absenteeism
Effects RAM: 4D
Scenario All staff (on and off plot) have the potential to experience isolation from family
and friends, especially those on rot ational duty; working on dead-lines, pressure
owning to the nature of the work environment is inherent.
Route & Form of
Exposure
Frequency & Duration of
Exposure
Exposure Limit
Exposure Rating &
Justi fication
ALARP Status Assessment incomplete
ALARP Justification Site verification of cont rols and recovery measures required
Control s Effectivene ss
Stress - generic organisational cont rols - Clear organisational structure with adequate
human resources.
Local Control - Good camp, welfare and sport facilities. No overcrowding in facilities or in
accommodations.
Training and information on hazard - Periodic health awareness (with focus on suicide
prevention) and general stress awareness provided at all work locations by PDO
Occupational Health team (e.g. during HSSE meetings).
Recovery Measure s Effectivene ss
Stress - generic recovery measures - Employee assistance program (call centre during
office hours).
Remedial Actions Priority
Local Remedial Action - Implement ent ertainment and other facilities for long term shift
staff in accommodations.
Written procedure/safe work practice - Confirm that PDO ex pectations for shift rotations
and employee welfare included in Contractor Agreements.
Administrative controls, such as area restrictions and limited schedules - Confirm that a
monitoring system is in place to verify Contractor compliance to local Labour Law
pertaining to work cycle and annual leave.
Administrative controls, such as area restrictions and limited schedules - Confirm a fatigue
risk management program is available for implementation covering HSE critical jobs.
Printed: 24/04/2014 Printed copies of this docume nt should be treated as information of te mpor ary value and destroyed after use
Page 44 of 74
Acute Potential Health Muscular discomfort; eyestrain; soreness to soft tissues (e.g. wrist)
Effects RAM: 1D
Chronic Potential Health Work-related upper limb dis orders, repetitive strain injury
Effects RAM: 3D
Scenario Poor workplace design can lead to repetitive movements and awkward static
postures, excessive stretching, bending and force exertion in office and
Operations staff who are us ers of V DU's, keyboards, mice and control panels.
Route & Form of
Exposure
Frequency & Duration of Variable
Exposure 2 - 4 hours
Exposure Limit
Exposure Rating &
Justi fication
ALARP Status Assessment incomplete
ALARP Justification
Control s Effectivene ss
Ergonomic workplac e assessment - HFE screening for project and control room
completed by HFE professional (input from Shell Health) and res ults of analysis
implemented for FEED.
Administrative controls, such as area restrictions and limited schedules - Rotation
schedule considered.
Ergonomically designed furniture & workstations - PDO approved furniture.
Recovery Measure s Effectivene ss
RSI Case management - Return to work practice in consultation with PDO Occupational
Healt h team.
Remedial Actions Priority
Printed: 24/04/2014 Printed copies of this docume nt should be treated as information of te mpor ary value and destroyed after use
Page 45 of 74
Acute Potential Health Heat stroke leading to death (lesser symptoms: exhaustion, cramps, ras h,
Effects fatigue)
RAM: 4B
Chronic Potential Health Dermatitis
Effects RAM: 2C
Scenario Exposure to relative humidity when working outdoors.
Route & Form of
Exposure
Frequency & Duration of Daily
Exposure 4 - 8 hours
Exposure Limit
Exposure Rating &
Justi fication
ALARP Status Assessment incomplete
ALARP Justification Requires site verification.
Control s Effectivene ss
Process design/equipment standards - Design makes provision for separate resting areas
with AC and fresh, cool water supply (Sulfur Blocking area and FA R buildings).
Recovery Measure s Effectivene ss
Printed: 24/04/2014 Printed copies of this docume nt should be treated as information of te mpor ary value and destroyed after use
Page 46 of 74
Hazard Simple Asphyxiants- Nitrogen Blanket, Inert Gase s, Oxygen Depletion, and
Gas Releases
RAM: Medium
Printed: 24/04/2014 Printed copies of this docume nt should be treated as information of te mpor ary value and destroyed after use
Page 47 of 74
Acute Potential Health Severe eye irritant, corrosive to mucous membranes, choking, coughing,
Effects pulmonary edema
RAM: 3B
Chronic Potential Health Dermatitis
Effects RAM: 2B
Scenario Sodium hypochlorite planned to be used as a biocide. Production Operators and
Maintenance Staff (pump maintenance) have potential ex posure scenarios when
working on: water inlet and treatment systems, fire storage system (batch
treatment) and the IB C's (storage area).
Route & Form of Dermal, Inhalation, Splash
Exposure Liquid
Frequency & Duration of Variable
Exposure 1 - 2 hours
Exposure Limit
Exposure Rating &
Justi fication
ALARP Status Assessment incomplete
ALARP Justification
Control s Effectivene ss
Administrative controls, such as area restrictions and limited schedules - Biocides cleared
through CAP (Chemical approval process).
Local Control - Use of chlorine in addition to UV treatment (holding tanks).
Hazard identification by signs/warnings/labels - PDO requires SHOC cards to be available
and displayed where product is stored.
Recovery Measure s Effectivene ss
Printed: 24/04/2014 Printed copies of this docume nt should be treated as information of te mpor ary value and destroyed after use
Page 48 of 74
Hazard Sulfur
RAM: Low
Acute Potential Health Irritating to the eyes and skin, can inflame the respiratory tract. May off gas H2S
Effects and SO2.
RAM: 2C
Chronic Potential Health Dermatitis and chronic bronchitis.
Effects RAM: 3B
Scenario Production Operators, Maintenance Staff and Contractors (for sulfur handling)
are potentially exposed to liquid molten sulfur in the sulfur recovery unit, sulfur
handling area, leaks from CPF (increased burns from molten sulfur) and during
over-pressure events in the liquid sulfur storage tanks with loss of containment.
Cont ractors (sulfur handling) are potentially exposed to solid sulfur in the
blocking plant and CPF.
Route & Form of Dermal, Inhalation, Splash
Exposure Liquid
Frequency & Duration of Variable
Exposure 2 - 4 hours
Exposure Limit
Exposure Rating &
Justi fication
ALARP Status Assessment incomplete
ALARP Justification
Control s Effectivene ss
Process design/equipment standards - Cantilever system for sulfur pouring opposed to a
wheeled system.
Decontamination of equipment - Us e of nit rogen and fuel gas for clearing sulfur run-down
blockages.
Process design/equipment standards - External heating on the liquid sulfur molten tanks
opposed to internal heating coils.
Process design/equipment standards - Design incorporates pouring arms to divert/spread
sulfur in the sulfur blocking/CPF plants.
Process design/equipment standards - Layout separation between the sulfur blocks, CPF
and power plant (following 200m good practice rule). Wind direction taken into
consideration when deciding block location.
Recovery Measure s Effectivene ss
Printed: 24/04/2014 Printed copies of this docume nt should be treated as information of te mpor ary value and destroyed after use
Page 49 of 74
Acute Potential Health Corrosive to skin and ey es. Respiratory irritant, may cause pulmonary edema
Effects RAM: 4B
Chronic Potential Health Carcinogen IA RC 1, impairment of lung function, tooth erosion
Effects RAM: 4B
Scenario Maintenance staffs have potential for exposure to Sulfur Trioxide (in liquid and
gas phas e). Exposure scenario's exists in CANSOLV unit (pre-treatment) and
RO feed wat er system from the CANS OLV quenc h.
Route & Form of Dermal, Inhalation
Exposure Gas
Frequency & Duration of Variable
Exposure 1 - 2 hours
Exposure Limit
Exposure Rating &
Justi fication
ALARP Status Assessment incomplete
ALARP Justification
Control s Effectivene ss
Closed system - Closed system design.
Recovery Measure s Effectivene ss
Printed: 24/04/2014 Printed copies of this docume nt should be treated as information of te mpor ary value and destroyed after use
Page 50 of 74
Printed: 24/04/2014 Printed copies of this docume nt should be treated as information of te mpor ary value and destroyed after use
Page 51 of 74
Acute Potential Health Corrosive to skin and ey es. Respiratory irritant, may cause pulmonary edema
Effects RAM: 4C
Chronic Potential Health Carcinogen IA RC 1, impairment of lung function, tooth erosion
Effects RAM: 4B
Scenario Plant Operators have potential exposure scenario's when working on the
CANSOLV Unit (pump system for injection to scrubber) - initial activation of
CANSOLV solvent; IBC (storage) and water treatment plan (DEMIN water).
Route & Form of Dermal, Inhalation, Splash
Exposure Liquid
Frequency & Duration of Variable
Exposure 1 - 2 hours
Exposure Limit
Exposure Rating &
Justi fication
ALARP Status Assessment incomplete
ALARP Justification
Control s Effectivene ss
Administrative controls, such as area restrictions and limited schedules - Chemical
compatibility study undertaken.
Process design/equipment standards - Chemical warehouse designed to accommodate
separation of incompatible materials.
Local Control - Reduced manual handling (large cont ainers vs. smaller containers).
Recovery Measure s Effectivene ss
Emergency / safety showers - Safety shower/eye wash stations in facility design where
risk of exposure has been identified.
Remedial Actions Priority
Printed: 24/04/2014 Printed copies of this docume nt should be treated as information of te mpor ary value and destroyed after use
Page 52 of 74
Hazard Ultra violet light (UV) - wavelength 100 - 400 nm (non-ionizing radiation)
RAM: Medium
Printed: 24/04/2014 Printed copies of this docume nt should be treated as information of te mpor ary value and destroyed after use
Page 53 of 74
Hazard Visible light (too much; too little) - wavelength 400 - 780 nm (non-ionizing
radiation)
RAM: Low
Acute Potential Health Eyestrain, headaches, decreas ed efficiency, increase in work errors.
Effects RAM: 1C
Chronic Potential Health None known
Effects RAM:
Scenario All staff are potentially exposed to insufficient lighting and poor night time
illumination of the plant and facilities.
Route & Form of
Exposure
Frequency & Duration of Variable
Exposure 4 - 8 hours
Exposure Limit
Exposure Rating &
Justi fication
ALARP Status Yes
ALARP Justification
Control s Effectivene ss
Process design/equipment standards - HFE screening completed to assess if a detailed
survey was required.
Local Control - CCTV to reduce operator frequency of walkabout.
Recovery Measure s Effectivene ss
Printed: 24/04/2014 Printed copies of this docume nt should be treated as information of te mpor ary value and destroyed after use
Page 54 of 74
Acute Potential Health Hot wax fumes irritate the eyes and respiratory tract; burns from molten wax
Effects RAM: 1B
Chronic Potential Health None known
Effects RAM:
Scenario Production Operators and Maint enance staff have potential exposure scenarios
when working in the chemical storage area and working on well heads.
Route & Form of Dermal, Splash
Exposure Liquid
Frequency & Duration of Variable
Exposure 1 - 2 hours
Exposure Limit
Exposure Rating &
Justi fication
ALARP Status Assessment incomplete
ALARP Justification
Control s Effectivene ss
Written procedure/safe work practice - Chemical approval procedure (CAP) in place with
chemical compatibility study.
Hazard identification by signs/warnings/labels - PDO requires SHOC cards to be available
and displayed where product is stored.
Cont ainment / Isolation - Storage areas are designed to be shaded, bunded and have an
appropriate slope towards rain.
Process design/equipment standards - Fittings/couplings designed for chemicals.
Allocated chemical storage areas.
Recovery Measure s Effectivene ss
Printed: 24/04/2014 Printed copies of this docume nt should be treated as information of te mpor ary value and destroyed after use
Page 55 of 74
Acute Potential Health General discomfort, e.g. feeling too hot/too cold, stiff neck, dry throat/eyes,
Effects headaches
RAM: 1D
Chronic Potential Health None known
Effects RAM:
Scenario Office based and control room staff have potential exposure scenarios to indoor
air temperat ures that are too hot/cold, causing discomfort.
Route & Form of
Exposure
Frequency & Duration of Daily
Exposure 4 - 8 hours
Exposure Limit
Exposure Rating &
Justi fication
ALARP Status Assessment incomplete
ALARP Justification
Control s Effectivene ss
Process design/equipment standards - HVAC system designed with adjustable
temperature controls. Design follows DEP 34.17.00.32 & DEP 30.00.60.15.
Recovery Measure s Effectivene ss
Printed: 24/04/2014 Printed copies of this docume nt should be treated as information of te mpor ary value and destroyed after use
Page 56 of 74
Acute Potential Health Cell damage e.g. skin burns, sickness, loss of hair - potentially fatal
Effects RAM: 3B
Chronic Potential Health Human carcinogen (IARC 1), Damage to reproductive system and blood cells.
Effects RAM: 4B
Scenario NDT Operators have potential exposure to sealed sources/NDT, as well as staff
providing in-field oversight.
Route & Form of Dermal
Exposure Other
Frequency & Duration of Variable
Exposure 2 - 4 hours
Exposure Limit
Exposure Rating &
Justi fication
ALARP Status Assessment incomplete
ALARP Justification
Control s Effectivene ss
Written procedure/safe work practice - Work executed in compliance with the extensive
safe work procedure that is in place - a condition of P TW system. Emergency respons e
plan has been approved by regulatory authority (Omani Ministry of Environment).
Administrative controls, such as area restrictions and limited schedules - Exclusion zone.
Local Control - Use of a registered cont ractor. Wear of radiation badges.
Recovery Measure s Effectivene ss
Printed: 24/04/2014 Printed copies of this docume nt should be treated as information of te mpor ary value and destroyed after use
Page 57 of 74
Printed: 24/04/2014 Printed copies of this docume nt should be treated as information of te mpor ary value and destroyed after use
Page 58 of 74
Printed: 24/04/2014 Printed copies of this docume nt should be treated as information of te mpor ary value and destroyed after use
Page 59 of 74
Appendix 1: Definitions
Acute Health Effect
Healt h Effect that occurs immediat ely or a short time (seconds to hours) following exposure, such as heat
stroke, chemical burns and asphyxiation.
Agent
See Haz ard
Barrier
A Risk Control or a Recovery Measure. Barriers provide the means of preventing an E vent or Incident, or of
mitigating the Consequences. A Barrier can be an item of equipment or a human int ervention, and can also
be a Control on an Escalation Facto r.
Consequence
An Effect on people, assets, the environment or reput ation as a result of a Hazard being released.
Control
A means of preventing an Incident. Controls can be engineering, proc edural or behavioural.
Effect
The Consequence of the releas e of a Hazard.
Escalation Factor
A situation, condition or circumstance that may lead to the partial or full failure of a Barrier.
Event
An Incident that occurs when a Hazard is released.
Exposure Limit
The airborne concent ration of chemical agents and levels of physical agents to which nearly all workers may
be repeatedly expos ed day after day without adverse Effect.
Exposure Rating
The chance of over-exposure to a healt h hazard when compared against agreed control standards. The
exposure rating is evaluated as Very Low, Low, Medium or High.
Hazard
An agent with the potential to cause harm to people, damage to Assets, or an Impact on the environment or
reputation.
Health Hazard
A factor of a physical, chemical, biological, ergonomic or psychological nature with the potential to cause
harm to the healt h of people.
Printed: 24/04/2014 Printed copies of this docume nt should be treated as information of te mpor ary value and destroyed after use
Page 60 of 74
Incident
An unplanned E vent or chain of E vents that has, or could have, resulted in injury or illness or damage to
Assets, the environment or reputation.
Likelihood
The probability that a specified Consequence will happen.
Recovery Measure
A Barrier that reduces the Consequences of the release of a Hazard as a result of an Incident. Rec overy
Measures can be engineering, proc edural or behavioural measures.
Ri sk
The combination of the Consequence of a specific Haz ard being released and the Likelihood of it happening.
Ri sk Asse ssment
The process of identifying the Cons equences of the Worst Case Credible Scenario arising from the release
of a Hazard, and estimating the Likelihood of that scenario.
Severity
A level of Consequence on the RAM on a scale of 0 to 5.
TBD
To be determined.
Printed: 24/04/2014 Printed copies of this docume nt should be treated as information of te mpor ary value and destroyed after use
Page 61 of 74
Printed: 24/04/2014 Printed copies of this docume nt should be treated as information of te mpor ary value and destroyed after use
Page 62 of 74
Printed: 24/04/2014 Printed copies of this docume nt should be treated as information of te mpor ary value and destroyed after use
Page 63 of 74
Printed: 24/04/2014 Printed copies of this docume nt should be treated as information of te mpor ary value and destroyed after use
Page 64 of 74
Printed: 24/04/2014 Printed copies of this docume nt should be treated as information of te mpor ary value and destroyed after use