Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Critical Aprraisal Journal Rudy Humisar Siahaan New
Critical Aprraisal Journal Rudy Humisar Siahaan New
2. What is the Study Penelitian ini adalah jenis penelitian observasional dengan
Type ? clinical trial, yaitu dengan membandingkan levobupivakain
0.75ml/kg of 0.25% dan bupivakain 0.75ml/kg of 0.25%
“After approval from the institutional research and ethics
committee and registering the trial with the Clinical Trial
Registry of India (CTRI No. CTRI/2014/06/004679), the
observational study was started”
3. What is the reference Populasi pada pasien ini adalah anak yang akan menjalani
population ? What are the prosedur pembedahan herniotomi ASA I dan II usia 3 bulan – 6
sampling frame and tahun. Ditetapkan 60 orang subjek penelitian namun tidak
sampling method ? dijelaskan proses sampling pasien.
6. What are the outcome Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa secara statistik, pemberian
factor and how are levobupivakain sama efektifnya terutama dalam blok kaudal
they measured ? dibandingkan dengan bupivakain, sehingga dapat disimpulkan
levobupivakain merupakan pilihan yang terbaik.
”Our study confirms that 0.75 ml/kg 0.25% levobupivacaine
causes definitely less motor blockade compared to bupivacaine.
This is the most commonly used volume and concentration of
local anesthetic used for caudalepidural analgesia for
herniotomy. Although a moderate degree of residual blockade
is not a major problem, inability to communicate the same in
nonverbal children leads to agitation and excessive crying. This
can become a cause of parental anxiety also. In addition to this
it isalways advisable to discharge a patient who is free of
motor blockade in a day care setting.”
7. What important Potensial Co-Founder pada penelitian ini adalah
potential cofounders - Jenis Kelamin
are considered ? - Data hemodinamik (HR, TD, MAP) diukur pada menit 5
,dan 10 menit
Semua Potensial Co-Founder diperhitungkan secara statistik
pada penelitian ini.