Professional Documents
Culture Documents
215–233
Abstract
Experiments were conducted in a drop-tube furnace to determine the ash character and to
measure ash deposition for Loy Yang brown coal and the same coal treated with aluminium
lactate. A series of experiments on sized fractions, using the same stoichiometry Ž20% excess air.,
gas temperatures Ž1000–12508C. and surface temperatures of the deposition probe Ž500–8008C.
allowed direct comparison of results for the treated and untreated coals. The results show that
treatment with aluminium reduces the amount of sodium-rich fine ash and also causes an overall
reduction in the ash-size distribution when compared to the untreated coal. The treated coal was
markedly less fouling and slagging, particularly at a deposit probe temperature of 7008C.
Thermodynamic calculations and experimental data ŽXRD, FTIR. indicate that the added alu-
minium in the treated coal led to the formation of aluminium-rich phases such as MgAl 2 O4 and
sodium aluminosilicates. The reduction in fouling and slagging is probably due to the decrease in
the sodium chloride and the formation of aluminium-rich phases. q 1998 Elsevier Science B.V.
Keywords: Fouling; Slagging; Sodium; Ash formation; Deposition; Modelling; Brown coal
1. Introduction
Ash fouling of boiler tube surfaces during the combustion of low-rank coals is a
serious operating problem for power stations. The nature of the fouling depends on coal
)
Corresponding author. Fax: q61-8-8303-3648.
properties for a given boiler design and operating conditions. In pf combustion of brown
coal, fouling and slagging are particularly sensitive to sodium levels. Studies have been
conducted by several researchers w1–8x on understanding and controlling the fouling
problems associated with the firing of lignites and brown coals. In these studies, much
emphasis was placed on the effect of additives in controlling deposit formation on boiler
tubes, especially of aluminium additives, to reduce sodium-related fouling. The treat-
ment of coal with soluble aluminium proves to be an effective method for controlling
fouling from Victorian brown coal w9–11x. Because of the hydrophilic nature of brown
coal, coal can readily be treated with soluble aluminium salts in aqueous media. Most of
the ash-forming constituents are present as carboxylate-bound ionic species and thus
inorganics in an aqueous coalrwater slurry would be expected to migrate from the
aqueous phase through the pores of the coal particles into the coal matrix w12x. Research
has been carried out at the State Electricity Commission of Victoria ŽSECV. on the
extent of aluminium retention by brown coals and the likely impact of the aluminium on
the ash-formation chemistry of the treated coals w13x.
The thermal conditions prevailing in pulverised-coal-fired boilers change widely and
depend on several aspects which include, mode of firing, coal rank, firing rate and the
extent of fouling of boiler. For a typical Victorian-brown-coal-based Loy Yang Power
station, calculated thermal history Žtimertemperature. of gas and fly ash has been
reported by Brockway et al. w14x. The calculated thermal history indicate that the
residence time of the burning coal particle in a flame region is ; 1 s Žcorresponding to a
peak flame temperature of 12708C.. This is followed by a fairly uniform temperature
decrease during the next 2.5 s to a furnace exit temperature of 10708C. The fly ash
formed, and volatile species travel with flue gas through these changing thermal regions.
For simulating closely the thermal conditions prevailing in a pulverised-coal-fired boiler,
a vertical drop-tube furnace has been employed for the present studies.
In the present work, experiments have been carried out to determine the influence of
gas temperature on the ash chemistry of untreated and treated Loy Yang brown coals
and to observe the deposition behaviour of the coals on a probe placed at the end of a
drop-tube furnace. In this way, data were obtained on the relative effects of aluminium
treatment on the ash chemistry and, from this, effects could be deduced relating the
influence of aluminium on the ash chemistry. The experiments carried out on untreated
and treated coals were:
Ži. Variation of furnace temperature and collection of ash with a quench probe. The
small-sized ash was separated with a cyclone and collected with a filter.
Žii. Collection of deposits at one furnace temperature by varying probe surface
temperatures to test the effects of condensation of sodium compounds on deposit
formation.
This paper presents results on the treatment of Loy Yang brown coal with soluble
aluminium and subsequent changes to the ash character. From the experimental results
and with thermodynamic equilibrium calculations, an attempt has been made to the
describe the ash formation for the tested coals.
H.B. Vuthaluru, T.F. Wall r Fuel Processing Technology 53 (1998) 215–233 217
2. Experimental
Victorian brown coals are generally characterised by a high moisture content, low ash
yield and high oxygen content. The inorganic constituents in these coals exert an
important influence on the performance of these coals in power station boilers. For
several years, the formation of ash deposits during the combustion of Victorian brown
coal has been a subject of extensive study w14x. Problems have been encountered with
ash deposits from Loy Yang coal in power station boilers.
The pulverised coal used in this study is a Victorian brown coal from the Loy Yang
coal field from bore LY2479. This is typical high-sodium coal containing discrete
mineral particles ŽSiO 2 ., particularly in size from about 8 to 80 m m w10x. The other
ash-forming elements, Na, Mg, Ca, Fe, Al, Cl and S, are usually bound within the coal
matrix to oxygen functional groups. The models used for thermodynamic calculations
consider the silica particles being separated from the burning coal particles. Silicates
may form through gas–solid reactions Že.g., sodium species with solid silica particles,
w15x.. Silicates in deposits may Žalso. form through reactions in deposits, for instance, by
the capture of ash particles by Žsticky. silicate particles.
About 100 kg of pulverised Loy Yang coal brown coal from bore LY2479 was
elutriated to remove fine particles. The coal was separated into three size cuts using an
18 in. Sweco Vibroenergy Separator operating in a continuous mode with a screw
feeding coal system. Coal retained as the 43–90 m m cut was used as the untreated coal
for the experiments reported in this paper.
The sized coal was treated with a solution of aluminium lactate. A waterrcoalrad-
ditive slurry was prepared by adding aluminium lactate Ž0.2 wt.% of coal. to 140 ml of
water at 708C. Air-dried coal Žabout 60 g. was slowly added while stirring for 30 min at
708C and allowed to settle. The solid was washed with about 100 ml of hot water and
then dried at 1008C in an oven. The characteristics of the treated and untreated coals are
given in Table 1.
The coal samples Žboth treated and untreated. were burnt in the drop-tube furnace at a
rate of 4–5 g hy1 . Gas temperatures chosen were 10008C, 11008C and 12508C. Details
of the drop-tube furnace and temperature profiles are given in Ref. w4x. The experiments
were conducted to obtain two sets of ash samples. The first set of experiments
concentrated on collecting cyclone ash and the submicron ash. However, the second set
of experiments specifically dealt with the collection of deposits. These experiments were
done mainly to determine the deposition behaviour of the two coals at a furnace
temperature of 12508C and at deposit probe temperatures of 5008C, 6008C, 7008C and
218 H.B. Vuthaluru, T.F. Wall r Fuel Processing Technology 53 (1998) 215–233
Table 1
Analyses of untreated and treated coal samples
Sample Coal ultimate analysis Coal minerals Coal inorganics Other
Ž% d.b.. Ž% d.b. Ž% d.b.. Ž% d.b..
Designation C H N S SiO 2 Na Mg Ca Fe Cl Al 2 O 3
Untreated coal 65.4 4.8 0.5 0.28 0.64 0.46 0.14 0.08 0.45 0.41 0.07
Treated coal 65.4 4.8 0.5 0.28 0.53 0.13 0.11 0.06 0.33 0.12 0.4
8008C. The details of the ash-sampling system and the deposit probe used for the two
sets of experiments are given below.
determining SO4y and Cly, using ion-chromatography, Na, Ca, Mg, Al and Fe by atomic
absorption spectroscopy ŽAAS. or ICP.
additive on the ash chemistry. Infrared spectra were recorded using KBr pellets with
Perkin–Elmer IR and FTIR Spectrometers.
Treatment of the coal slurry with aluminium compound caused a decrease in the
levels of sodium and chloride and an increase in the level of ionic aluminium in the coal
matrix, as analysed by atomic absorption spectroscopy w10x. Loss of sodium and chloride
occurs mainly by the extraction of sodium chloride into the aqueous phase of the slurry.
The uptake of aluminium ions appears to take place via chelation by functional groups
w16x.
SEM studies carried out on treated and untreated Loy Yang coal samples show an
uneven distribution of inorganics within the particles, reflecting the different maceral
compositions of the coal grains. No direct correlation could be found between an uptake
of aluminium and the loss of inorganics. A careful examination was made of silica
within the coal grains, including a direct comparison under identical conditions between
a silica standard, untreated coals and treated coals, using computer correction for
background levels. No silica could be found above the background level of five samples
examined. SEM studies of the external characteristics of the same coal samples revealed
silica and clay particles and the bulk composition was comparable to the bulk analyses
for that coal.
Ashing coal in a muffle furnace produces an ash with similar ‘bulk’ characteristics to
that of fly ash collected in the precipitators of pilot-scale and full-scale furnaces w13x.
Infrared spectra of such ashes have been studied to obtain information on the overall
effects of additives on the ash chemistry w17x. Increases in the aluminium content of the
coal have caused marked changes in the 700–400 cmy1 absorption region, showing that
these ashes form the spinel MgAl 2 O4 with increasing levels of Al. The spectra are
typical for aluminium ashes with some sodium sulphate and relatively small amounts of
silicates. Because the ash is produced at about 8008C, Na 2 SO4 would form but with
little sodium silicate. The spectra indicate that levels of 0.2–0.3% aluminium may be
sufficient to cause the Loy Yang coal to be non-fouling.
Table 2
Mass of ash samples collected with gas temperature Žuntreated coal.
Gas temperature Ž8C. Cyclone ash Žg. Filter ash Žg.
1000 0.061 0.008
1100 0.059 0.010
1250 0.053 0.008
H.B. Vuthaluru, T.F. Wall r Fuel Processing Technology 53 (1998) 215–233 221
Table 3
Mass of ash samples collected with gas temperature Žtreated coal.
Gas temperature Ž8C. Cyclone ash Žg. Filter ash Žg.
1000 0.048 0.002
1100 0.046 0.035
1250 0.040 0.007
amount of these vapours to undergo homonuclear condensation and thus form submicron
ash particles. The relative amount of sulphur to chloride increased with furnace
temperature, suggesting that sodium sulphate formation is favoured at lower gas
temperatures. Crystalline phases of sodium sulphate are clearly observed along with
mixed NarClrS and NarMgrClrS species. The samples are probably formed by the
condensation and subsequent gas–solid phase reactions between sodium chloride and
SO 2rSO 3 in the gas phase. A significant number of small ash particles containing iron
and magnesium are observed. Such small particles may result from either fragmentation
of coal during combustion or fume formed from the vaporisation of these inorganics
w18,19x.
Table 4
Quantities of adhered ash collected
Temperature of target disc Ž8C. Untreated coal Treated coal
Weight of deposit Weight of deposit
Žg. and Ž% of ash. Žg. and Ž% of ash.
500 0.0028 Ž2.7. 0.0031 Ž1.3.
600 0.0065 Ž6.3. 0.0034 Ž3.3.
700 0.0164 Ž15.8. 0.0061 Ž5.9.
800 0.0178 Ž17.1. 0.0112 Ž10.8.
H.B. Vuthaluru, T.F. Wall r Fuel Processing Technology 53 (1998) 215–233 223
smaller than that for the untreated coal at the same furnace temperature. It is likely that
at 12508C a larger number of sticky particles form and coagulation and particle capture
may cause an increase in ash-particle size.
The size and composition of the filter ash is markedly different for the treated coal.
The main cause is the reduced level of sodium and chloride in the treated coal, leading
to a reduction in the amount of NarClrS fume produced.
4. Calculations
Computational methods dealing with ash formation and deposition can be very
complicated and the validity of the results often depend on assumptions made regarding
226 H.B. Vuthaluru, T.F. Wall r Fuel Processing Technology 53 (1998) 215–233
Calculations on the phases within ash particles and deposits would require informa-
tion on the ways that all ash particles may interact, since any solid-phase formation
requires that the reactants are in contact with each other. Thus solid transformations may
occur once the ash particles are deposited on a surface, provided the temperature is
sufficient for chemical reaction.
Thermodynamic calculations have been performed for the following two ‘models’:
Ži. reactions only between inorganics in a coal particle, restricting silicate formation to
reactions between silica and sodium species Žunmixed model.;
Žii. include inorganics and silica Žmixed model..
Table 5
Relative molar concentrations of major phasesa for the discrete mineralsrinorganics in untreated coal
Žunmixed model.
Temperature ŽK. Fly ash phases Silicates Sodium species
1400 Fe 2 O 3 0.1511 Na 2 Si 2 O5 0.1020 NaClŽg. 0.259ey03
Fe 3 O4 0.0165 Na 2 Si 2 O5 0.0773 NaOHŽg. 0.583ey04
MgFe 2 O4 0.1419 SiO 2 0.2212 Na 2 SO4 Žg. 0.488ey06
CaFe 2 O4 0.0528 Na 2 SO4 0.618ey01
MgO 0.1267
1500 Fe 2 O 3 0.1370 Na 2 Si 2 O5 0.1228 NaClŽg. 0.282ey03
Fe 3 O4 0.0276 Na 2 Si 2 O5 0.0972 NaOHŽg. 0.226ey04
MgFe 2 O4 0.1501 SiO 2 0.2073 Na 2 SO4 Žg. 0.336ey06
CaFe 2 O4 0.0771 Na 2 SO4 0.902ey02
MgO 0.1420
1600 Fe 2 O 3 0.1181 Na 2 Si 2 O5 0.1184 NaClŽg. 0.287ey03
Fe 3 O4 0.0393 Na 2 SiO 3 0.0787 NaOHŽg. 0.536ey04
MgFe 2 O4 0.1467 SiO 2 0.2411 Na 2 SO4 Žg. 0.109ey06
CaFe 2 O4 0.0866 Na 2 SO4 0.771ey03
MgO 0.1503
a
Solids unless noted Žg.; molar concentrations are for solids or gases of major phases.
228 H.B. Vuthaluru, T.F. Wall r Fuel Processing Technology 53 (1998) 215–233
Table 6
Relative molar concentrations of major phasesa for the discrete mineralsrinorganics in untreated coal Žmixed
model.
Temperature ŽK. Fly ash phases Silicates Sodium species
400 Fe 2 O 3 0.2615 Na 2 Si 2 O5 0.0542 NaClŽg. 0.287ey03
Fe 3 O4 0.0375 Na 2 SiO 3 0.0775 NaOHŽg. 0.536ey04
MgFe 2 O4 0.0765 CaSiO3 0.0771 Na 2 SO4 Žg. 0.109ey06
CaFe 2 O4 0.0019 MgSiO 3 0.0769 Na 2 SO4 0.771ey03
Mg 2 SiO4 0.0389
SiO 2 0.1173
1500 Fe 2 O 3 0.2379 Na 2 Si 2 O5 0.0719 NaClŽg. 0.295ey03
Fe 3 O4 0.0638 Na 2 SiO 3 0.1230 NaOHŽg. 0.373ey04
MgFe 2 O4 0.1005 CaSiO3 0.0876 Na 2 SO4 Žg. 0.895ey06
CaFe 2 O4 0.0042 MgSiO 3 0.0677 Na 2 SO4 0.240ey01
Mg 2 SiO4 0.0411
SiO 2 0.0960
1600 Fe 2 O 3 0.2101 Na 2 Si 2 O5 0.0765 NaClŽg. 0.297ey03
Fe 3 O4 0.0932 Na 2 SiO 3 0.0986 NaOHŽg. 0.835ey04
MgFe 2 O4 0.0997 CaSiO3 0.0878 Na 2 SO4 Žg. 0.265ey06
CaFe 2 O4 0.0075 MgSiO 3 0.0747 Na 2 SO4 0.187ey02
Mg 2 SiO4 0.0425
SiO 2 0.1243
a
Solids unless noted Žg.; molar concentrations are for solids or gases of major phases.
had melted. At 1400 K the amount of sodium sulphate predicted in mixed phases is
comparable to the amount of NaCl present ŽTable 6., whereas if sodium sulphate were
considered as a single phase the concentration is predicted as 0.1 of NaCl. At
1250–1300 K, which is close to the lowest temperature of the drop-tube furnace, the
mixed phase and single phase models give similar predictions although mixed-phase
calculations indicate NaCl and NaOH will also be present.
Table 7
Comparison of measured and calculated molar ratios of S to Cl in filter ash for concentrations similar to
drop-tube Žuntreated coal.
Temperature Ž8C. Measureda Calculated
1000 1:1 1:0.7
1100 1:5 1:4
1250 1:7 1:16
a
Accuracy within "10%.
H.B. Vuthaluru, T.F. Wall r Fuel Processing Technology 53 (1998) 215–233 229
Table 8
Relative molar concentrations of major phasesa for the discrete mineralsrinorganics in treated coal Žunmixed
model.
Temperature ŽK. Fly ash phases Silicates Sodium species
1400 Fe 2 O 3 0.1792 Na 2 Si 2 O5 0.0455 NaClŽg. 0.637ey04
Fe 3 O4 0.0213 Na 2 SiO 3 0.0220 NaOHŽg. 0.248ey05
MgFe 2 O4 0.0564 SiO 2 0.3457 Na 2 SO4 Žg. 0.105ey06
MgAl 2 O4 0.1402 Na 2 SO4 0.134ey01
Al 2 O 3 0.0415
1500 Fe 2 O 3 0.1551 Na 2 Si 2 O5 0.0219 NaClŽg. 0.717ey04
Fe 3 O4 0.0332 Na 2 SiO 3 0.0476 NaOHŽg. 0.817ey05
MgFe 2 O4 0.0589 SiO 2 0.3556 Na 2 SO4 Žg. 0.453ey07
MgAl 2 O4 0.1377 Na 2 SO4 0.121ey02
Al 2 O 3 0.0429
1600 Fe 2 O 3 0.1296 Na 2 Si 2 O5 0.0398 NaClŽg. 0.749ey04
Fe 3 O4 0.0452 Na 2 SiO 3 0.0169 NaOHŽg. 0.198ey04
MgFe 2 O4 0.0573 SiO 2 0.3770 Na 2 SO4 Žg. 0.150ey07
MgAl 2 O4 0.1356 Na 2 SO4 0.106ey03
Al 2 O 3 0.0462
a
Solids unless noted Žg.; molar concentrations are for solids or gases of major phases.
may form silicates. The results are consistent with infrared spectra of laboratory ashes
which show the formation of MgAl 2 O4 with increasing aluminium content of the coal.
Calculations with the mixed model showed that the most favoured phases are
NaAlSiO4 , MgAl 2 O4 , CaMgSi 2 O6 and the oxides SiO 2 , Fe 2 O 3 and Al 2 O 3 ŽTable 9..
Alumina and silica, with Mg phases, account for the bulk of the aluminium. Indeed, over
Table 9
Relative molar concentrations of major phasesa for the discrete mineralsrinorganics in treated coal Žmixed
model.
Temperature ŽK. Fly ash phases Silicates Sodium species
1400 Fe 2 O 3 0.2503 NaAlSiO4 0.1106 NaClŽg. 0.634ey04
Fe 3 O4 0.0351 CaSiO 3 0.0661 NaOHŽg. 0.244ey05
MgAl 2 O4 0.0931 MgSiO3 0.0608 Na 2 SO4 Žg. 0.107ey06
MgFe 2 O4 0.0447 SiO 2 0.1519 Na 2 SO4 0.135ey01
Al 2 O 3 0.0486 CaMgSi 2 O6 0.0140
1500 Fe 2 O 3 0.2197 NaAlSiO4 0.1011 NaClŽg. 0.720ey04
Fe 3 O4 0.0560 CaSiO 3 0.0671 NaOHŽg. 0.830ey05
MgAl 2 O4 0.0932 MgSiO3 0.0601 Na 2 SO4 Žg. 0.469ey07
MgFe 2 O4 0.0471 SiO 2 0.1668 Na 2 SO4 0.126ey02
Al 2 O 3 0.0515 CaMgSi 2 O6 0.0131
1600 Fe 2 O 3 0.1850 NaAlSiO4 0.0815 NaClŽg. 0.747ey04
Fe 3 O4 0.0770 CaSiO 3 0.0654 NaOHŽg. 0.196ey04
MgAl 2 O4 0.0923 MgSiO3 0.0612 Na 2 SO4 Žg. 0.109ey07
MgFe 2 O4 0.0464 SiO 2 0.1928 Na 2 SO4 0.103ey03
Al 2 O 3 0.0554 CaMgSi 2 O6 0.0123
a
Solids unless noted Žg.; molar concentrations are for solids or gases of major phases.
230 H.B. Vuthaluru, T.F. Wall r Fuel Processing Technology 53 (1998) 215–233
Table 10
Comparison of measured and calculated molar ratios of S to Cl in filter ash for concentrations similar to
drop-tube Žtreated coal.
Temperature Ž8C. Measureda Calculated
1000 8:1 9:1
1100 5:3 2:5
1250 1:1 1:500
a
Accuracy within "10%.
4.1.3.1. Untreated coal runs. At a gas temperature of 12508C, the composition of the fly
ash and the vapour species is that shown in Table 6. The silicates and other solid phases
would not be expected to undergo further transformations, but the sulphate and chloride
levels may, by the condensation of chloride and sulphate, and further displacement of
H.B. Vuthaluru, T.F. Wall r Fuel Processing Technology 53 (1998) 215–233 231
chloride from NaCl by SO 2 in the gas phase. The formation of molten NaCl at about
8008C Žmelting point of NaCl. would further complicate matters and crystal formation
has been noted in the deposits.
4.1.3.2. Treated coal runs. The calculated species shown in Tables 8 and 9 may form
deposits at the levels of sodium, sulphur and chloride observed during drop-tube
experiments. The lower levels of fouling observed for the treated coal would result from
a lower relative amount of sodium silicates, larger amounts of aluminium phases and
lower relative amounts of sodium salts.
5. Conclusions
The treatment of a high-fouling and slagging brown coal with soluble aluminium has
been found to:
Ži. Reduce the amount of sub-micron ash, due to a reduction in the amounts of
sodium and chloride through greater capture of sodium salts on alumina particles
Žheterogeneous condensation. and the formation of sodium aluminosilicates.
Žii. Cause an interaction between the molten silicate particles and aluminium-contain-
ing ash which has probably formed sodium aluminosilicates. The increased amounts of
aluminium-containing phases and aluminium silicate formation has markedly reduced
the slagging tendency of the treated coal.
Žiii. Decrease the amount of ash which adhered to the deposit probe, indicating a
marked reduction in fouling of surfaces. Relative to the untreated coal, the treated coal
produced the greatest reduction in deposit weight at 7008C.
Thermodynamic calculations indicate that the ash-formation process outlined in the
descriptive model is appropriate for brown coal. Burning char particles normally reach
temperatures which may lead to molten ash phases on the burning particles. Silicates are
unlikely to form within the char because no silica has been detected within the coal
particles. Most of the silica particles exist as discrete particles and supports the unmixed
calculations. Silica particles however may form molten sodium silicates, and the molten
surface of these particles may then interact with other finer ash particles to form sodium
aluminosilicates as shown in the descriptive model. The experimental and theoretical
approach employed in the present work is also suitable for other high-sodium low-rank
coals.
It is evident from the above conclusions that the ash-related problems associated with
the utilisation of brown coals can be controlled and prevented by pretreating the coal
with aluminium prior to firing them in power station boilers.
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to thank the staff of the Coal Evaluation Section ŽAnalytical Group.
and Materials Chemistry Section, State Electricity Commission of Victoria, for their
assistance, especially with coal preparation, analysis and ion-chromatography analysis.
232 H.B. Vuthaluru, T.F. Wall r Fuel Processing Technology 53 (1998) 215–233
The authors like to acknowledge the following colleagues of University of Newcastle for
their cooperation: R.P. Gupta for helpful discussions, T. Farrugia for advice on ash
sample analysis, and G. Weber and D. Phelan for their instructions on SEM analysis.
The authors also like to thank Dr. J.M. Vleeskens and Dr. G. Domazetis for their
valuable suggestions.
References
w1x A.J. Lowe, D.J.A. McCaffrey, D.G. Richards, Fuel Processing Technol. 36 Ž1993. 47–53.
w2x E.R. Lindner, A. Kosminski, C. Taylor, R.G. Williams, Effects of additives on fouling behaviour
characteristics of South Australian brown coals, in: Proceedings of Australian Coal Science Conference,
University of Adelaide, 16–18 May 1988, pp. B2:11.1–B2:11.14.
w3x S. Devine, G. Mackay, Studies of ash deposit to metal tube bonding, NERDDP project 1045, State
Electricity Commission of Victoria, Research and Development Dept., Report No. NDr89r053, 1989.
w4x H.B. Vuthaluru, Sodiumrash reactions during pulverised coal combustion—Treatments and additives to
control deposition, PhD thesis, Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Newcastle, Australia,
1992.
w5x H.B. Vuthaluru, R.P. Gupta, T.F. Wall, Sodium reaction with kaolin, silica and alumina, Presented at the
Joint International Conference on Coal Combustion, The Combustion Institute, Sydney, September 1991.
w6x H.B. Vuthaluru, G. Domazetis, T.F. Wall, J.M. Vleeskens, Fuel Processing Technology, submitted for
publication.
w7x H.K. Hein, in: The effects of mineral matter, Proceedings of Pulverised Coal Firing, Dept. Chemical
Engineering, University of Newcastle, Paper L15.1–34, 1979.
w8x H.K. Hein, Fouling and Slagging Resulting from Impurities in Combustion Gases, in: R.W. Bryers ŽEd..,
Proceedings of the Engineering Foundation Conference, 12–17 July 1991, New England College, New
Hampshire, 1991, pp. 69–83.
w9x H.B. Vuthaluru, G. Domazetis, T.F. Wall, J.M. Vleeskens, Fuel Processing Technol. 46 Ž1996. 117–132.
w10x G. Domazetis, G. Kitanovic, Minimising ash fouling from high sodium brown coals, Volume 2b:
Treatment of low rank coals with soluble aluminium compounds, NERDDP Project 1167, End of Grant
Report, State Electricity Commission of Victoria, Research and Development Department, Report No.
NDr90r056, 1990.
w11x G. Domazetis, Fly ash formation and sulphation during the combustion of brown coal, NERDDP Project
933, End of Grant Report, State Electricity Commission of Victoria, Research and Development
Department, Report No. NDr88r048, 1988.
w12x L.E. Paulson, W.W. Fowkes, Changes in ash composition of North Dakota lignite treated by ion
exchange, US Department of the Interior, Bureau of Mines, Report 7176, 1967.
w13x G. Domazetis, Ash formation from inorganics in Victorian brown coal, Proceedings of the 1985
International Conference on Coal Science, 389 Ž1985..
w14x D.J. Brockway, A.L. Ottrey, R.S. Higgins, in: R.A. Durie ŽEd.., The Science of Victorian Brown Coal:
Structure, Properties and Consequences for Utilisation, Chap. 11, pp. 597–650.
w15x E.R. Lindner, A study of sodium-ash reactions during the pulverised coal, PhD thesis, Department of
Chemical Engineering, University of Newcastle, Australia, 1988.
w16x R.H. Kadlec, G.A. Keoleian, Metal Ion Exchange in Peat and Water, in: C.H. Fuchsman ŽEd.., Elsevier
Applied Science Publ., New York, 1986.
w17x G. Domazetis, Use of infrared spectroscopy in the characterisation of precipitator ash, State Electricity
Commission of Victoria, Research and Development Department, Report No. SOr84r82, 1984.
w18x R.J. Quann, A.F. Sarofim, in: Proceedings of the Nineteenth Symposium ŽInternational. on Combustion,
The Combustion Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, 1982, pp. 1429–1440.
w19x J. Helble, M. Neville, A.F. Sarofim, in: Proceedings of the 21st Symposium ŽInternational. on Combus-
tion, The Combustion Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, 1986, pp. 411–417.
H.B. Vuthaluru, T.F. Wall r Fuel Processing Technology 53 (1998) 215–233 233
w20x S. Devine, X-ray diffraction examination of six samples from 100-h furnace a33 using LY2479 coal,
State Electricity Commission of Victoria, Research and Development Department, Test Report No.
CEr87r06, 1987.
w21x A. Campisi, Application of graphite-furnace AAS for investigations of the release of inorganic species
from coal particles, State Electricity Commission of Victoria, Research and Development Department,
Report No. S0r88r131, 1988b.
w22x A.A. Boni, R.C. Flagan, J.J. Helble, T.W. Peterson, A.F. Sarofim, S. Srinivasachar, J.O.L Wendt,
Transformations of inorganic coal constituents in combustion systems, Report to US Department of
Energy, Pittsburgh, Contract No. DE-AC22-86PC-90751, 1989.
w23x J.W. Hastie, D.W. Bonnell, High Temp. Sci. 19 Ž1985. 275.