Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Now if we can only show A, K, N, C are theorem. For a triangle ABC, let G, D, E, this point, you can see the angles of
concyclic, then we will get 180 $ for the F be the centroid, the midpoints of sides ∆KO 2 O3 equal the three angles with
displayed equations above and we will BC, CA, AB, respectively. Let O1 , O 2 , vertices at G on the left side of segment
finish. However, life is not that easy. This O3 , O 4 , O5 , O6 be the circumcenters of AD.
turned out to be the hard part. If you draw triangles DBG, BFG, FAG, AEG, ECG, Now we try to put these three angles
the circle through A, C, N, then you see it CDG, respectively. together in another way to form another
goes through K as expected and triangle. Let M be the point on line AG
surprisingly, it also goes through another such that MC is parallel to BG. Since
point, I. With this discovery, there is new ∠MCG = ∠BGF , ∠MGC = ∠FGA
hope. Consider the arc through B, I, O. (and ∠GMC = ∠BGD , ) we see
On the two sides of this arc, you can see ∆KO 2 O3 , MCG are similar.
there are corresponding point pairs (A, C),
(K, N), (J, H), (F, G). So to show A, K, N, The sides of ∆MCG are easy to compute
C are concyclic, we can first try to show N in term of AD, BE, CF. As AD and BE
is on the circle through A, C, I, then in that occurred in the ratio of KO1 and KO4 ,
Well, should we draw the 6 circumcircles? this is just what we need! Observe that
argument, if we interchange A with C, K,
with N and so on, we should also get K is
It would make the picture complicated. ∆MCD , GBD are congruent since
on the circle through C, A, I. Then A, K, N,
The circles do not seem to be helpful at ∠MCD = ∠GBD (by MC parallel to GB),
C (and I) will be concyclic and we will
this early stage. We give up on drawing CD = BD and ∠MDC = ∠GDB. So
the circles, but the circumcenters are 2
finish. MG = 2GD = AD,
important. So at least we should locate 3
Wishful thinking like this sometimes them. To locate the circumcenter of 2
works! Here are the details: ∆FAG , for example, which two sides do MC = GB = BE
3
∠ACN = ∠GCN = 180$ − ∠GHN we draw perpendicular bisectors? Sides (and CG = 23 CF. Incidentally, this means
= ∠NHD = ∠NID = 180$ − ∠AIN . AG and FG are the choices because they
the three medians of a triangle can be put
are also the sides of the other small
So N is on the circle A, C, I. together to form a triangle! Actually, this
triangles, so we can save some work later.
Interchanging letters, we get similarly K is well-known and was the reason we
Trying this out, we discover these
is on circle C, A, I. So A, K, N, C (and I) considered ∆MCG .) We have
perpendicular bisectors produce many
are concyclic. Therefore, K, L, M, N, O KO3 / KO 2 = MG/MC = AD/BE =
parallel lines and parallelograms!
are indeed concyclic. KO1 / KO 4 .
(History. My friend C.J. Lam did a search Since circumcenters are on perpendicular
on the electronic database JSTOR and bisectors of chords, lines O3 O 4 , O6 O1 So KO1 ⋅ KO2 = KO3 ⋅ KO 4 , which
came across an article titled A Chain of are perpendicular bisectors of AG, GD, implies O1 , O 2 , O3 , O 4 are concyclic.
Circles Associated with the 5-Line by J.W. respectively. So they are perpendicular to
Similarly, we see that O 2 , O3 , O 4 , O5
Clawson published in the American line AD and are 12 AD units apart.
Mathematical Monthly, volume 61, concyclic (using the parallelogram formed
Similarly, the two lines O1 O 2 , O 4 O5 by the lines O1O 2 , O 4 O5 , O 2 O3 , O5O6
number 3 (March 1954), pages 161-166.
1
There the problem was attributed to the are perpendicular to line BE and are 2
BE instead) and O3 , O 4 , O5 , O6 are
nineteenth century geometer Miquel, who units apart. Aiming in showing O1 , O 2 , concyclic.
published the result in Liouville’s Journal
O3 , O 4 are concyclic by the converse of
de Mathematiques, volume 3 (1838),
pages 485-487. In that paper, Miquel the intersecting chord theorem, let K be
the intersection of lines O1 O 2 , O3 O 4 Olympiad Corner
proved his famous theorem that for four
and L be the intersection of the lines (continued from page 1)
pairwise intersecting lines, taking three of
the lines at a time and forming the circles O 4 O5 , O6 O1 . Since the area of the Problem 4. We say that a positive
through the three intersecting points, the parallelogram K O 4 L O1 is integer r is a power, if it has the form r =
four circles will always meet at a common
1 1 t s where t and s are integers, t ≥ 2 ,
point, which nowadays are referred to as AD ⋅ KO 4 = BE ⋅ KO1 , s ≥ 2 . Show that for any positive integer
2 2
the Miquel point. The first problem was n there exists a set A of positive integers,
we get K O1 /K O 4 = AD/BE.
then deduced as a corollary of this Miquel which satisfies the conditions:
theorem.) Now that we get ratio of KO1 and KO4 , 1. A has n elements;
For the second problem, as the 6 we should examine KO2 and KO3 . 2. any element of A is a power;
circumcenters of the smaller triangles are Trying to understand ∆KO2 O3 , we first 3. for any r1 , r2 , …, rk ( 2 ≤ k ≤ n )
find its angles. Since KO 2 ⊥ BG,
not on any circles that we can see r1 + r2 + + rk
immediately, so we may try to use the O 2 O3 ⊥ FG and KO3 ⊥ AG, we see that from A the number
k
converse of the intersecting chord ∠KO 2 O3 = ∠BGF and ∠KO3O 2 =
is a power.
∠FGA . Then ∠O 2 KO 3 = ∠DGB . At
Mathematical Excalibur, Vol. 6, No. 1, Jan 01 – Mar 01 Page 3
closer to ST. Show that OM ⊥ MN if and Solution 1. CHAO Khek Lun (St. Paul’s b−c c−a
College, Form 6), CHAU Suk Ling = f (a ) + f (b),
only if S, N, T are collinear. (Source:
(Queen Elizabeth School, Form 6) and b−a b−a
1997 Chinese Senior High Math CHUNG Tat Chi (Queen Elizabeth which is what we will get if we solve for
Competition) School, Form 4). f (c ) in the two inequalities in the
Solution. LEUNG Wai Ying (Queen Applying the inclusion-exclusion statement of the lemma.
Elizabeth School, Form 6). principle, we see there are 82 integers on In brief the lemma asserts that the slopes
[104, 208] that are divisible by 2, 3, 5 or of chords are increasing as the chords are
7. There remain 23 other integers on the moving to the right. Now we are ready to
interval. If 28 integers are chosen from proof the majorization inequality.
the interval, at least 28 – 23 = 5 are Suppose
among the 82 integers that are divisible ( x1 , x 2 , ..., x n ) ( y1 , y 2 , ..., y n ).
by 2, 3, 5 or 7. So there will exist two Since xi ≥ xi +1 and y i ≥ y i +1 for i = 1,
that are both divisible by 2, 3, 5 or 7. 2, …, n – 1, it follows from the lemma
Solution 2. CHAN Yun Hung (Carmel that the slopes
Divine Grace Foundation Secondary f ( xi ) − f ( y i )
School, Form 4), KWOK Sze Ming mi =
xi − yi
(Queen Elizabeth School, Form 5), LAM
Shek Ming (La Salle College, Form 5), satisfy mi ≥ mi +1 for 1 ≤ i ≤ n – 1.
LEUNG Wai Ying (Queen Elizabeth
(For example, if y i +1 ≤ y i ≤ xi +1 ≤ x i ,
Consider the tangent lines at S and at T. School, Form 6), WONG Tak Wai Alan
(Suppose they are parallel, then S, O, T (University of Toronto) and WONG then applying the lemma twice, we get
Wing Hong (La Salle College, Form 3).
will be collinear so that M and N will be f ( xi +1 ) − f ( y i +1 )
mi +1 =
equidistant from ST, contradicting N is There are 19 prime numbers on the x i +1 − y i +1
closer to ST.) Let the tangent lines meet at interval. The remaining 86 integers on
K, then ∠OSK = 90 $ = ∠OTK implies O, f ( x i +1 ) − f ( y i )
the interval are all divisible by at least ≤
S, K, T lie on a circle with diameter OK. one of the prime numbers 2, 3, 5, 7, 11 x i +1 − y i
Also, KS 2 = KT 2 implies K is on the and 13 since 13 is the largest prime less f ( xi ) − f ( y i )
radical axis MN of the two inside circles. ≤ = mi
than or equal to 208 . So every number xi − yi
So M, N, K are collinear. on the interval is a multiple of one of
If S, N, T are collinear, then ∠SMT = and similarly for the other ways y i +1 , y i ,
these 25 primes. Hence, among any 26
∠SMN + ∠TMN = ∠NSK + ∠KTN = integers on the interval at least two will
xi +1 , xi are distributed.)
180 $ − ∠SKT . So M, S, K, T, O are have a common prime divisor. For k = 1, 2, …, n, let
concyclic. Then ∠OMN = ∠OMK =
X k = x1 + x 2 + + x k
∠OSK = 90 $ .
and
Conversely, if OM ⊥ MN , then ∠OMK A Proof of the Majorization Inequality Y k = y1 + y 2 + + y k .
= 90 $ = ∠OSK implies M, S, K, T, O are Kin Y. Li
Since X k ≥ Yk for k = 1, 2, …, n – 1 and
concyclic. Then Quite a few readers would like to see a
X n = Yn , we get
∠SKT = 180 $ − ∠SMT proof of the majorization inequality,
n
= 180 $ − ∠SMN − ∠TMN which was discussed in the last issue of
∑ ( X k − Yk )( m k − m k +1 ) ≥ 0,
the Mathematical Excalibur. Below we k =1
= 180 $ − ∠NSK − ∠KTN .
will present a proof. We will first make where we set m n +1 = 0 for convenience.
Thus, ∠TNS = 360 $ − ∠NSK − ∠SKT -
one observation. Expanding the sum, grouping the terms
∠KTN = 180 $ . Therefore, S, N, T are Lemma. Let a < c < b and f be convex
collinear. involving the same m k ’s and letting
on an interval I with a, b, c on I. Then the
Comments: For the meaning of radical following are true: X 0 = 0 = Y0 , we get
axis, we refer the readers to pages 2 and 4 f ( c ) − f ( a ) f ( b) − f ( a ) n
of Math Excalibur, vol. 4, no. 3 and the ≤ ∑ ( X k − X k −1 − Yk + Yk −1 )m k ≥ 0,
c−a b−a k =1
corrections on page 4 of Math Excalibur,
and which is the same as
vol. 4, no. 4.
f (b) − f ( c ) f (b) − f ( a ) n
Other commended solvers: CHAO Khek ≤ . ∑ ( x k − y k ) m k ≥ 0.
Lun (St. Paul’s College, Form 6). b−c b−a k =1
Proof. Since a < c < b, we have c = (1 – Since ( x k − y k )m k = f ( x k ) − f ( y k ),
Problem 120. Twenty-eight integers are t)a + tb for some t ∈ (0, 1). Solving for t, we get
chosen from the interval [104, 208]. we get t = (c – a)/(b – a). Since f is n