Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Isolation and Suffering Related to Serious and Terminal Illness: Metaphors and
Lessons from Albert Camus’ Novel, The Plague
PII: S0885-3924(17)30315-9
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2017.07.046
Reference: JPS 9477
Please cite this article as: Tuffuor AN, Payne R, Isolation and Suffering Related to Serious and Terminal
Illness: Metaphors and Lessons from Albert Camus’ Novel, The Plague, Journal of Pain and Symptom
Management (2017), doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2017.07.046.
This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to
our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo
copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please
note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all
legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
PT
Isolation and Suffering Related to Serious and Terminal Illness:
RI
Metaphors and Lessons from Albert Camus’ Novel, The Plague
SC
Richard Payne, M.D.
U
AN
Running Title: Isolation and Suffering: Lessons from The Plague
Corresponding Author:
AC
Abstract
Health care providers have much to learn from Albert Camus’ great novel, The Plague .
The Plague tells the story of a bubonic plague epidemic through the lens of doctor-narrator
Rieux. In addition to Rieux, this essay also focuses on the perspective of Father Paneloux, a
PT
Jesuit priest who provides important religious commentary on the epidemic, before falling victim
RI
to it and dying. Camus’ masterful engagement of the metaphor of isolation and its profound
impact on suffering emphasizes the important role of community and spiritual perspectives of
SC
patients and providers in coping with serious illness, death, and dying. The Plague is relevant
today, particularly given the challenges of distancing, alienation and isolation imposed by not
U
only disease, but also by technology, and clinical and administrative practices that have
AN
unintended consequences of incentivizing separation between patient and healer, thus
M
Introduction
Recognizing and responding to the existential and physical distress that causes suffering
during the course of a serious medical illness are the sine qua non of palliative care.1 To
maintain a clear vision of the sources of suffering in our patients, we can reflect on literature and
PT
the visual arts whose content addresses suffering. Albert Camus’ masterpiece , The Plague
RI
demonstrates how literature can provide insight into the multidimensional experience of
suffering and its impact on the patient as well as the caregiver. 2 Set in the northern African city
SC
of Oran in the mid-twentieth century, The Plague tells the story of a bubonic plague epidemic
through the lens of Rieux, a medical doctor. By addressing the struggle of an ailing community
U
from Rieux’s perspective, Camus allows us to not only feel the internal struggles of the patients,
AN
but also the emotional effects of illness on the patients’ caregivers as well as the collapse and
revival of a community. Through the dialogue of several characters, particularly Dr. Rieux and
M
Father Paneloux, Camus provides important commentary on the role of caregivers for the
D
seriously ill, and the role of religion and spirituality in healing the dying. Dr. Rieux’ journey
TE
aspects of professionalism, compassionate caring, and later, emotional burnout. Father Paneloux,
EP
a Jesuit priest, provides critically important religious perspectives on illness, suffering, death,
and dying during the epidemic; his religiosity serves as a foil to Rieux’s atheism.
C
Palliative care practitioners must address psychological and spiritual distress in their
patients in ways that do not reduce it to merely another medical symptom. As chronic illness
compromises the integrity of the body, patients experience suffering that extends beyond
physical causes. Alienation from self, family, community, and even from one’s own God
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
exacerbates suffering. Humans depend on social context to provide meaning to their existence.
Ironically, even hospice and palliative care programs may contribute to the isolation of patients
when they take on the reductionist culture of traditional medical environments, by approaching
suffering as a medical symptom, and making it difficult for their patients to maintain healthy
PT
connections to family and loved ones. As the late theologian Allen Verhey has noted,
RI
paradoxically the success of the palliative care movement in recent years may actually contribute
SC
“The great advance of the inclusion of hospice care with health care coverage has risked
subsuming hospice care under health care…rendering death and dying medical events rather than human
events. The growing professionalism of palliative care…has been attended by the risk of breaking
U
community with the dying. The expertise…can form relations of ’expert’ and ‘needy’ beneficiaries.
Worse, those of us who are not ‘expert’ and have ‘compassion’ may exercise it by sending the one
suffering or dying away, surrendering their care into the hands of the expert stranger.”
AN
As Verhey implies, the risk of sending sick people to palliative care experts ironically
M
might exacerbate suffering by isolating the patients from a community of loved ones. Camus
illustrates the relationship between isolation and suffering when he compares the plight of the
D
patient to imprisonment. Camus notes that many of the Oranians felt that “they had been
TE
sentenced, for an unknown crime, to an indeterminate period of punishment”.2 Camus’ use of the
EP
analogy to imprisonment captures the ethos of many patients undergoing palliative and end of
life care today. In order to combat a patient’s sense of “imprisonment”, the healing process must
C
Patients are not the only victims of the exhaustion, depression, and suffering associated
with the isolating effects of illness. Many palliative and hospice care professionals experience
compassion fatigue, a kind of emotional burnout that stems from constantly attending to patients
who face particularly gloomy prognoses.4 Dr. Rieux demonstrates signs of compassion fatigue
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
as he cares for those dying from bubonic plague. While tending to patients, Dr. Rieux noticed
that, “[his sensibility] seemed to snap completely now and then, leaving him the prey of his
emotions. No resource was left but to tighten the stranglehold on his feelings and harden his
heart protectively”. 2 The intimate nature of healing people can often obfuscate the boundaries
PT
between a provider’s professional work and personal care work.4 Healing takes such a toll on
RI
Rieux’s spirit that he emotionally withdraws and sinks reflexively into a state of hopelessness
and personal defeat. For Dr. Rieux, like many of our contemporary non-fictional colleagues, this
SC
withdrawal serves as a putatively “protective” mechanism. Dr. Rieux understood that during the
plague “...a period whose end he could not glimpse, his task was no longer to cure but to
U
diagnose. To detect, to see, to describe, to register. And then condemn (emphasis ours)--that was
AN
his present function”.2 Although the endless dying associated with the bubonic plague causes
Rieux to emotionally withdraw to avoid a profound sense of professional and personal failure, it
M
also forces him eventually to reflect on his understanding of the difference between a failure to
D
The artist Vincent van Gogh’s painting “Portrait of Dr. Gachet” captures the emotional
EP
weariness associated with depression similar to that of Dr. Rieux. One can sense Dr. Gachet’s
distress through observing his weary expression and his distant gaze that indicates his
C
resignation. Of note, Van Gogh’s relationship with the real Dr. Gachet intensified in the artist’s
AC
later years when his health declined. In fact, both van Gogh and Gachet experienced periods of
deep depression. This underscores the unfortunate truth that doctors’ state of health can mirror
characterized by death and dying. In fact van Gogh wrote a letter to his brother Theo in which
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
he writes, “I think that we must not count on Dr. Gachet at all. First of all, he is sicker than I am,
I think, or shall we say just as much, so that's that. Now when one blind man leads another blind
PT
Spiritual and religious beliefs can either serve as a source of support in times of stress or
RI
can compound anxiety, depression and gloom. Father Paneloux experiences the latter as he
witnesses the death of others and eventually succumbs to the plague himself. Father Paneloux
SC
demonstrates how religious fervor can mask one’s complicity in human despair. The Jesuit priest
first preached a view of theodicy that required wholehearted acceptance of the suffering of
death and dying, and provides no space for accommodating the very human need to lament the
M
evil and suffering in the world. During one of his sermons Paneloux proclaims that, “the love of
D
God is a hard love. It demands total self-surrender, disdain of our human personality. And yet it
TE
alone can reconcile us to suffering and the deaths of children, it alone can justify them, since we
cannot understand them, and we can only make God's will ours...That is the faith, cruel in men's
EP
eyes, and crucial in God's.2 However, following this dangerous advice would stifle palliative
care clinicans’ ability to connect to their patients through a bond of a common humanity that
C
encompasses the need to question suffering. Paneloux’s beliefs do not encourage faith, but rather
AC
encourage an ultimately self-defeating sense of human resignation. In the end, Father Paneloux’s
own death reiterates how his authoritarian view of God’s will failed to grant him peace. When
Dr. Rieux offered to stay with Paneloux in his last moments of life, “...speaking with such
difficulty that it was impossible to tell if there was sadness in his voice, [Paneloux] said:
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
"Thanks. But priests can have no friends. They have given their all to God.”2 Paneloux’s
rejection of Rieux’s offer to keep him company severs a tie to a human connection that could
have celebrated his individuality and role in the community. In other words, Paneloux rejected a
potential way to alleviate his existential isolation and distress. In the end, his inability to question
PT
the “hard love” of God proves to be its own source of suffering.
RI
Dr. Rieux, on the other hand, rejects the rigid Christian doctrine espoused by Father
Paneloux. Instead, Rieux not only accepts atheism, but embraces his spiritual doubt in order to
SC
find purpose in his work. During a conversation with another character, Jean Tarrou, Dr. Rieux
says, “since the order of the world is shaped by death, mightn't it be better for God if we refuse
U
to believe in Him and struggle with all our might against death, without raising our eyes toward
AN
the heaven where He sits in silence." Tarrou nodded. "Yes. But your victories will never be
lasting; that's all." Rieux's face darkened. "Yes, I know that. But it's no reason for giving up the
M
struggle." 2 It seems that Rieux’s “struggle against death” provides a foundation of compassion,
D
that is, the ability “suffer with” (the Latin root of compassion)6 and to be affected and moved to
TE
Shortly before his death, Father Paneloux appears to have engaged in some introspection
about his absolutist view of God. His sermon described a more collective experience of spiritual
C
suffering, thus reminding us that in a healthy and truly healing relationship, doctor and patient
AC
are united in a bond embedded in a social context. He acknowledged that “for many long months
the plague had been in our midst, and we now knew it better, after having seen it often seated at
our tables or at the bedsides of those we loved. We had seen it walking at our side…[we were]
better able to comprehend what it was telling us unceasingly; a message to which...we might not
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
have listened in due heed”.2 By emphasizing the ubiquity of the effect of the plague, Paneloux
legitimizes the experience of people’s suffering. Furthermore, he seems to recognize that the
PT
However, as an atheist, Rieux might underestimate the powerful role that ritual and
RI
spirituality can play in the alleviation of suffering. In many religious traditions, rituals such as
singing hymnals, reciting sacred texts, and performing tradition-specific rites, reinforce the idea
SC
of belonging to and sustaining a community that can endure the spiritual pain of its members.
Healing narratives and parables in sacred texts often provide inspiration and illumination to the
U
religious believer. Had Dr. Rieux been able to call on personally meaningful rituals, one can only
AN
wonder if he would have been able to climb out of the “ditch” of his despair to better manage his
patients.
M
notes that even in this age of technologically advanced medical care, the physical examination
remains an important diagnostic tool.8 Perhaps of equal or greater importance is the idea that the
EP
routinized physical touching of patients in the examination signifies a human bond between a
patient and a doctor-healer and communicates to patients that their doctors will not abandon
C
them during their journey through illness. Unfortunately, deadly infectious diseases further
AC
isolate the patient from caregivers because they make physical contact risky, even dangerous,
Conclusion
The Plague’s masterful engagement of the metaphor of isolation and its profound impact
on suffering emphasizes the important role of community and spiritual perspectives of patients
and providers in coping with serious illness, death, and dying. Study of this novel is perhaps ever
PT
more relevant for contemporary health care providers and patients dealing with challenges of
RI
distancing, alienation and isolation imposed by disease, technology, and clinical and
administrative practices that seem to perversely incentivize separation between patient and
SC
healer, thus engendering greater stress and suffering in both. Furthermore, reading of this novel
can open the imaginations of healthcare providers and broaden their perspectives and approaches
U
to address the isolating effects of serious illness on their patients and themselves. Spiritual
AN
perspectives and needs of patients and caregivers alike require assessment and intervention to
effectively cope with illness, death and dying. Palliative care providers indeed can learn much
M
Figure 1. The Portrait of Dr. Gachet. Vincent Van Gogh. Oil on Canvas. 1890. Musse d’Orsay.
Paris.
PT
RI
U SC
AN
M
D
TE
C EP
AC
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
References
1
WHO Definition of Palliative Care. http://www.who.int/cancer/palliative/definition/en/. Accessed May 3,
2017
2
Albert Camus. The Plague. London, Allen Lane, 2001 (translated by Robin Buss)
PT
3
Allen Verhey. Reading the Bible in the Strange World of Medicine. Wm.B. Eerdman’s Publishing, Grand
Rapids, MI, 2003, p. 63-64
4
Leadoux K. Understanding compassion fatigue: understating compassion. Journal of Advanced Nursing
RI
2015;71:2041-2050
5
Vincent van Gogh. Letter to Theo van Gogh. Written 10 July 1890 in Auvers-sur-Oise. Translated by
Robert Harrison, edited by Robert Harrison, number 648.
SC
http://webexhibits.org/vangogh/letter/21/648.htm. (Accessed May 3, 2017)
6
Online etymology dictionary. http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=compassion. (Accessed May
3, 2107)
U
7
Verghese A. A Doctor’s Touch. TED Global, July, 2011.
AN
https://www.ted.com/talks/abraham_verghese_a_doctor_s_touch. (Accessed May 3, 2017)
8
Verghese A, Charlton B, Kassirer JP, Ramsey M, Ioannidis J. Inadequacies of physical examination as
a cause of medical errors and adverse events: a collection of vignettes. The American Journal of
Medicine 2015;128:1322-1324.
M
D
TE
C EP
AC
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
PT
RI
U SC
AN
M
D
TE
EP
C
AC