Union Wire Rope SIMPLIFIED CUT-OFF PRACTICE FOR ROTARY DRILLING For Ce Rig Number_1@ Union Wire Roberts Street, Konses "city, Missouri 64125 <¢ a ZIf too much wire rope is cut off too frequently, there will be an obvious waste of usable drilling line, which will result in higher than necessary rig operating costs. However, if the rope is moved through the reeving system too slowly, sooner or later some section of the drilling line will become worn and damaged to such an extent that there will be a danger of failure, injury to personnel, damage to equipment and expensive downtime. At the very least, it will be necessary to make @ "long cut” to eliminate some broken wires For these reasons, it is important that the drilling line be cut off at the proper rate. The purpose of this Simplified Cut-Off Practice is to give the drilling contractor a method for keeping track of the amount of work done by the drilling line, and a systematic procedure for making cuts of the appropriate length at the appropriate time, The objective is to obtain maximum rope service without jeopardizing the safety of the rig operation In conjunction with the record keeping required for the cut-off procedure, daily visual inspection of the drilling line should be made for broken wires and any other rope damage. It must be remembered that in all cases, visual inspection of the wire rope by the drilling contractor must take precedence over any predetermined calculations. TON-MILES The only complicated part of a cut-off procedure is the determination of how much work has been done by the wire rope. Methods such as counting the number of wells Grilled or keeping track of days between cuts are not accurate because the loads change with depth and with different drilfing conditions. The various operations performed (drilling, coring, fishing, setting casing, etc.) subject the rope to different amounts of wear. For an accurate record of the amount of work done by a drilling line, itis necessary to calculate the weight being lifted and the distance it is raised ond lowered. in engineering terms, work is measured in foot-pounds. On a drilling rig the loads and distances are so great that we use “ton-miles.” One ton-mile equals 10,560,000 foot-pounds, and is equivalent to lifting 2,000 pounds a distance of 5,280 feet, To simplify the calculation of ton-miles, Union Wire Rope has developed a Ton-Mile Indicator. The following pages provide examples of how this Indicator is used to determine the number of ton-miles of work done by the drilling line for various operations on the rig.Ata depth of 11,000 feet, a round tri is made to change the bit. drill pipe = 4-1/2" (16.6#/ft.) drill collars = ten, 7-1/4" (119.234/ft.) traveling block assembly weight (hook, elevators, traveling block) = 27,000# drilling fluid = mud Solution 1 DETERMINE WEIGHT FACTOR DUE TO COLLARS On back of Indicator, set bit at proper drill collar length, and read weight factor due to collars in appropriate window. Weight factor due to collars = 13,000%. DETERMINE TOTAL WEIGHT FACTOR Add together Weight Factor due to Collars and weight of Traveling Block assembly. Traveling Block Assembly Weight = 27,000# + Weight Factor due to Collars 13,000# Total Weight Factor 40,000# DETERMINE TON-MILES PER ROUND TRIP On front of Indicator, set bit at depth and read round trip ton-miles in appropriate window. Round Trip Ton-Miles = 337 T-M “Note: For laying down drill pipe at the end of well, figure one-half of round trip. ton-miles for drill string in question.DRILLING TON-MILES Situation Drilling continues from @ depth of 11,000 feet to a depth of 12,000 feet. drill pipe = 4-1/2" (16.6#/ft.) drill collars = ten, 7-1/4" (119.2#/ft,) traveling block assembly weight = 27,000# drilling fluid = mud Solution Ton-Miles for drilling from one depth to another are equal to 3 times the difference in round trip ton-miles for the two depths, 1. DETERMINE TON-MILES FOR A ROUND TRIP WHERE DRILLING STOPPED Set bit at 12,000" Read 40,000# window. Ton-Miles = 384 7-M 2. DETERMINE TON-MILES FOR A ROUND TRIP WHERE DRILLING STARTED Set bit at 11,000" Read 40,000# window. Ton-Miles = 337 T-M 3. CALCULATE DIFFERENCE IN ROUND TRIP TON-MILES 384 T-M —337 TM 47M 4, CALCULATE DRILLING TON-MILES Drilling ton-miles = difference in round trip ton-miles times 3. 47x3=141TM TON-MILES FOR DRILLING FROM 11,000’ to 12,000’ 41 TM,LES FOR SETTING CASING Situation Setting 10:3/4” (40.5#/ft.) casing from surface to 3,600 feet. traveling block assembly weight = 20,000# The ton-miles of work done in setting casing would be one-half the ton-miles done in making a round trip if the weight of the casing were the same as the weight of the drill pipe 1, DETERMINE THE RATIO OF CASING WEIGHT TO DRILL PIPE WEIGHT ao.safte teaeir. ~ 244 The casing is 2.44 times as heavy as drill pipe. 2. DETERMINE TON-MILES FOR MAKING A ROUND TRIP WITH PIPE Set Indicator bit at 3,600 feet. Read 20,000# window. (No drill collars are used, therefore, the Total Weight Factor is equal to the traveling block assembly weight only.) Round Trip Ton-Miles for Pipe = 46 T-M. 3. DETERMINE TON-MILES FOR MAKING A ROUND TRIP WITH CASING Multiply by the weight ratio 2.44 x 46 = 112T-M Round Trip ton-miles for casing = 112 T-M, 4, DETERMINE TON-MILES FOR SETTING CASING Divide by 2, since the casing is only set down and not pulled out, 112+ 2=56T-M Ton-Miles for setting casing = 56 T-M.TON-MILES FOR A SHORT TRIP Having drilled to 13,000 feet, a short trip is made back to 9,000 feet to condition the hole. drill pipe = 4-1/2” (16.6#/ft.) drill collars = twenty, 7-3/4" (138#/t.) traveling block assembly weight = 20,000# drilling fluid = mud The ton-miles of work done in making a short trip is equal to the round trip ton-miles at the deeper depth minus the round trip ton-miles at the shallower depth, 1. DETERMINE TON-MILES FOR A ROUND TRIP AT 13,000 FEET Set Indicator bit at 13,000 feet. Read 50,000# window. Round trip ton-miles at 13,000 feet = 483 T-M. 2. DETERMINE TON-MILES FOR A ROUND TRIP AT 9,000 FEET Set Indicator bit at 9,000 feet. Read 50,000# window. Round trip ton-miles at 9,000 feet = 284 T-M. 3. DETERMINE TON-MILES FOR THE SHORT TRIP Subtract 483 T.-M — 284 TM 199 T.-M ‘Ton-miles for the short trip = 199 T-M.TON. LES FOR ROUND TRIP OF MIXED DRILL STRING Situation Having drilled to 13,000 feet with the drill string shown on the left, 2 round trip is to be made. drilling fluid = mud traveling block assembly weight ~ 27,000# 5" (19.54/FT) DRILL PIPE Solution 9,000" 1. Weight Factor due to collars = 23,000#. 2. Total Weight Factor = 23,000# 4%" (16.6 #/FT) + 27.00% DRILL PIPE 50,0004 3. Ton-miles for round trips: 41/2" —13,000° = 4837-M 5” = 9,000" = + 303T-M 15-7" 786 T-M (138 #/FT) 4-1/2" — 9,000" ~ 284 T-M DRILL COLLARS 7 13,000" ore Ton-miles for a round trip with the mixed drill string = 502 TM.12,000" TON-MILES FOR ROUND TRIP WITH HEAVY WALL DRILL PIPE A" (16.6 #/F DRILL PIPE 30 JOINTS ae" (42 #/FT.) HEAVY WALL DRILL PIPE 20 JOINTS 7"(138 #/ FT.) DRILL COLLARS Situation Having drilled to 12,000 feet with the drill string shown on, the left, a round trip is to be made. Drilling Fluid = Mud Traveling Block Assembly Weight = 30,000# Solution Instead of trying to calculate the heavyweight pipe as in a mixed drill string, treat it as additional drill collars, Use the drill collar window on the back of the Ton-Mile Indicator which is closest to the heavyweight pipe weight, or do the calculations by hand. 1, DETERMINE WEIGHT FACTOR DUE TO COLLARS On the back of the Indicator, set bit at proper drill collar length, and read weight due to collars in appropriate window. Weight Factor due to Collars = 30,700# 2. DETERMINE WEIGHT FACTOR DUE TO HEAVY WALL DRILL PIPE Figure heavyweight pipe like drill collars. On back of Indicator, set bit at proper heavyweight pipe length, and read weight due to heavyweight pipe from the window with the closest drill collar weight (in this case the closest drill collar weight is 46.7#/Ft). An accurate value for Weight Factor due to heavyweight pipe can also be figured longhand as follows Excess weight per foot = 42.0 — 16.6 = 25.4 Total excess weight = (25.4) x (900') = 22,860# Bouyed excess weight = (22,860) x (.85) = 19,4314 1/2 Bouyed excess weight = (19,431) + (2) = 9,716# Weight Factor due to Heavyweight Pipe = 9,716# 3. DETERMINE TOTAL WEIGHT FACTOR Traveling Block Assembly Weight = 30,000¢ Weight Factor due to Collars = 30,700# Weight Factor due to Heavyweight Pipe = 9,716# Total Weight Factor = 70,4168 4. DETERMINE TON-MILES PER ROUND TRIP Set bit at 12,000’. Read 70,000# window.DESIGN FACTORS CHART 4 1-1/8" EXTRA IMPROVED PLOW ROTARY LINE UNION WIRE ROPE Weight indicator Reading ‘Weight Indicator Reading {1000's Lbs. ) (1000's tbs. ) 6 8 10 12 Design 6 10 Design Lines s_| vines | Lines | Factor Lines | Lines | Lines Factor_| 70 89 107 124 99 nz 150 180, 207 sa 4 7 |} 108 125 98 1190 | 83 we | an 58 ly n a tos. | 126 97 121 165 16 | 215 57 2 2 | in | 18 96 123 | 188 wo | 29 | se [9 B B 112 129 95 126 161 199 223 55 € 3 9% 113, 130 4 128 | 164 197 | 227 84 4 & 114 132 130 167 200 231 53 |N B % ns 133 133 | 170 20 | 235 82 [> % 7 nz 135 135 | 178 208 | 240 say 7 % ig | 136 138 | 177 212 | 246 5o Ny % 29 no | 138 141 181 217 | 250 as fy 7% | 101 121 139 tae | tat ar | 285 ae 4 ~ | i@ 12 14 147 | 188 226 | 260 a7 | 10 13 142 150 | 192 231 | 266, as [t at | tot 135 14a sea | 197 26 | 22 a5 |e 2 | 1 126 | 146 a 187 | 201 21 | 278 aa ly 8 | 107 128 | 147 83 xe | 206 247 | 25 43 a | tog 130 | 149 82 se | oan 253 | 291 42 ® | 109 131 181 a1 168 | 216 259 | 299 an ® fom 133 183 80 vm | 2a 26 | 306 40 | an 134 155, 79 wm | 227 2m | 36 39 89 113, 136 157 18 182 233 273 32 38 | 9 | 16 138 | 159 rm 387 | 239 287 | 331 37 a | 16 ao | tet 78 ve | 246 265 | 340 38 2 | ue 42 18 75 197 | 253 303 | 360 35 s | 120 ma 16 74 203 | 260 312 | 360 34 S | at 145, 168 73 209 | 268 22 | an 33 6 | 123 vs | 170 72 2s | 27 a2 | 33 32 a | 15 60 | 172 aa 23 | (25 343 | 3m 34 @ | 12 152 1% 70 230 | 26 354 | 408 30 10 | 128 154 17 6: 28 | 306 ses | 422 29 iw | 130 156 | 180 68 27 | 316 379 | 437 28 16 | 32 159 | 183 87 256 | 328 3m | ass 27 105 | 13 tet 1% 66 266 | 340 408 | 471 26 apr 105 | 136 168 188 65 27% | 368 42 | 490 25 [say op to | 138, 16 | 191 cs B | ow | oe 49 | 510 24 lor 0 | 140 169 | 198 63 € | 30 | 38 462 | 532 23 am | vgs fim | te 62 6] ae | ae a | ese 23 |heav v3 | tas 1m | 201 61 329 | aat sos | 5a Bt fea sins 15 | 447 in | 204 6o | 3s | age su | 612 20 ~ NWy UNION WIRE ROPE CUT-OFF PROGRAM 7/5” FOR 1.1/8” ROTARY DRILLING LINE Goal is 9.0 Ton-Miles per Foot Cut Length to Cut = Ton-Miles Since Last Cut = 9.0 Length ToCut TM Since Length Last Cut 1. Do not accumulate more than 1300 ton-miles between cuts, even on the first cut of a new line, 2. So long as less than 1300 ton-miles have been accumulated, a cut may be made anytime it is convenient. To determine the length to cut, refer to the above table or calculate so that your “ton-miles per foot cut” is constant. (LENGTH TO. CUT = T-M SINCE LAST CUT = 9.0) 3. This program is based upon a goal of 9.0. Any attempt to improve rope service by increasing the tan-mile goal should not be made until one entire drilling line (requiring no long cuts) has been used following this particular program, 4. It is best not to run up to the maximum permitted ton-miles each time before making a cut, as some problem on the rig could prevent a cut being made at the proper time and lead to a ton-mile overrun. A better approach is to bounce around on your program, cutting with a low ton-mile accumulation sometimes, and alternating with medium or higher ton-mile accumulations. This practice does not waste rope because you are always cutting lengths in proportion to the work accumulated, 5. Accurate measurement of the length to cut is very important. A steel tape should be used when making this measurement. 6. When stringing back from 12 to 10 lines or from 10 to 8 lines, make a cut of the appropriate length based upon the ton-mile accumulation at that time. This Procedure will ‘shift the critical wear points on the rope following heavy ‘operations such as setting casing Keep your wire rope History Sheets current, accurate and complete. 8 Calculate ton-miles for drilling after each round trip. Failure to record drilling ton-miles is probably the most common mistake made in cut-off practice. 9. The best cutoff program is the one with the most consistent ton-mile per foot cut values. By staying as close as possible to 9.0 you will avoid long cuts and maintain the safest, most economical use of your rotary drilling line. 10. Daily visual inspection of the drilling line should be made for broken wires and any other rope damage. It must be remembered that in all cases, visual inspection of the wire rope by the drilling contractor must take precedence over any predetermined calculations, maxTON-MILES PER FOOT CUT The purpose of calculating the amount of work done by the drilling line is to give an accurate method for determining when and how much drilling line to slip through and cut off. The objective of spreading the rope wear along the length of the line can be accomplished best by cutting lengths proportional to the ton-miles of work accumulated. All that is necessary is to maintain a consistent number of tan-miles per foot of rope cut. For @ given rope size, any particular rig can get only so many ton-miles of service. The key to @ successful cut-off procedure is to spread these ton-miles uniformly by using the optimum ton-mile per foot cut goal. A rig which has been able to get about 66,000 T-M out of a 1-3/8" x 5,000’ drilling fine, may have a string.up of 1,700" for ten parts. The remaining 3,300’ available to be cut off should be cut at a rate of one foot for every 20.0 ton-miles. (66,000 T-M = 3,300 ft. = 20.0 T-M/Ft.) The ton-mile goal would be 20.0. The ton-mile goal for any rig with good past performance records can be calculated in the same manner. If the rig is new, or if the records are unavailable, a ton-mile ‘goal can be selected from Table 1. You will note that only the drilling line size and the drum diameter are needed to determine a ton-mile goal. These are by fer the most important factors that influence ton-mile service on a drilling rig. TABLE 1 TON-MILE PER FOOT CUT GOAL FOR RIGS HAVING NO PAST PERFORMANCE RECORDS ae Rope Diameter ‘ope Diameter ae Gas 11/4" 1-3/8" 1-1/2" 1-5/8"CUT-OFF PROGRAM ‘Assuming that 1-3/8" drilling line is used on a NATIONAL 130 (30" drum) rig with No past performance records, Table 1 gives a suggested ton-mile goal of 19.0. Table 2 is the Union Wire Rope Cut-Off Program for a 19.0 ton-mile goal. Other programs are available for the specific goal required for your rig ‘You will note the program is summarized by the statement: Length To Cut = T-MSince Last Cut + 19,0 So tong as the maximum ton-mile accumulation shown on the program is not exceeded, a cut may be made whenever it is convenient. It is only necessary to total ‘the ton-miles accumulated since the last cut and divide by 19.0 to determine what length to cut. This way the ton-miles per foot cut will always be exactly 19.0, and the wear on the drilling line will be uniformly spread along its length. For convenience, the calculations have been made for a number of ton-mile accumulations, and are presented in tabular form on the program. TABLE 2 (EXAMPLE ONLY) UNION WIRE ROPE CUT-OFF PROGRAM FOR 1.3/8" ROTARY DRILLING LINE Goal is 19.0 Ton-Miles per Foot Cut Length to Cut = Ton-Miles Since Last Cut = 19.0 10SUGGESTIONS FOR CUT-OFF PRACTICE Whatever program is being used, it should be followed throughout the life of one entire drilling line. If no long cuts are required, and it is believed that more service can be had from a line, the goal can be raised one ton-mile per foot cut. This procedure should be followed until the optimum goal is found. Avoid accumulating more ton-miles between cuts than the maximum shown on the Program for your rig even on the first cut of a new line. It is best not to run up to the maximum permitted ton-miles each time before making a cut, as some problem on the rig could prevent a cut being made at the Proper time and lead to a ton-mile overrun. A better approach is to bounce around ‘on your program, cutting with a low ton-mile accumulation sometimes, and alternating with medium or higher ton-mile accumulations. This practice does not waste rope because you are always cutting lengths in proportion to the work accumulated. Accurate measurement of the length to cut is very important. A steel tape should be used when making this measurement. When stringing back from 12 to 10 lines or from 10 to 8 lines, make a cut of the appropriate length based upon the ton-mile accumulation at that time. This procedure will shift the critical wear points on the rope following heavy operations such as setting casing. Keep your wire rope History Sheets current, accurate and complete, Calculate ton-miles for drilling after each round trip. Failure to record drilling ton-miles is probably the most common mistake made in cut-off practice. The best cut-off program is the one with the most consistent ton-mile per foot cut values. By staying as close as possible to the ton-mile goal you will avoid long cuts and maintain the safest, most economical use of your rotary drilling line. Daily visual inspection of the dritling line should be made for broken wires and any other rope damage. It must be remembered that in all cases, visual inspection of the wire rope by the drilling contractor must take precedence over any predetermined calculations. uDESIGN FACTOR Design factor is defined a5 the ratio of nominal wire rope breaking strength to the wire rope tension. The maximum rope tension occurs in the fast line or “lead line” because of friction losses due to rope stiffness and bearing inefficiencies throughout the system. Consequently, the lead line tension is greater then the weight of the load divided by the number of parts of line. To calculate design factor it is necessary to compute the lead line tension using the following equations and table of lead line constants. NOMINAL ROPE BREAKING STRENGTH LEAD LINE TENSION DESIGN FACTOR = LEAD LINE TENSION = WEIGHT OF LOAD X CONSTANT TABLE 3 LEAD LINE CONSTANTS No. of Parts Of Line TABLE 4 NOMINAL ROPE BREAKING STRENGTH 6 x 19 CLASSIFICATION, BRIGHT (UNCOATED), INDEPENDENT WIRE ROPE CORE Nominal Improved Extra Improved Diameter Plow Steel Plow Stee! 1" 89,800# 103,400 11/8" 113,000#~ 130,000#— 41a" 138,800# 159,800# 1.3/8" 167,000# 192,000# 11/2" 197,800# 228, 000# 1.5/8" 230,000# 264, 0004 12For example, if the weight indicator reads 304,000# with 10 parts of 1-3/8” Improved Plow drilling line, the design factor may be calculated as follows: WEIGHT OF LOAD X CONSTANT 304,000# x 1224 37,210# NOMINAL ROPE BREAKING STRENGTH LEAD LINE TENSION 167,000# + 37,210# 45 LEAD LINE TENSION LEAD LINE TENSION LEAD LINE TENSION DESIGN FACTOR DESIGN FACTOR DESIGN FACTOR For convenience, the design factors have been calculated for various sizes and grades of \g line as shown in the following Table 5. A similar table is available for your specific requirements, 10 - PART STRING-UP Recommendid Practica 9B and most wire rope manufacturers suggest a minitrum design factor of 3.9 for tiling end tripping. I heavier toate are used so tha the design Tootor drops blows 3.0, the ton-mile serie fas lt sharply. Below = design factor of about 2.0, ware rope is permanently and ‘rreverriby damaged Consequentiy, 20 would seem to be a realistic minimum for safe operatign, giving some mara Tol stuck me 13TABLE 5. DESIGN FACTORS (Example Only For This Size and Grade Line) 1-3/8" IMPROVED PLOW ROTARY LINE UNION WIRE ROPE — Weight Indicator Reading Weight Indicator Reading 7] (1000's Lbs.) (1000's Lbs.) 8 8 Lines Lines 115 193 116 196 N7 199, 118 203 120 207 121 211 122 214 124 219 125 223 126 . 227 128 163, 77 89 232 129 155, 179 88 (237 131 157 181 8.7 (242 132 159 183, 86 247 134, 161 185 85 (253 135 162 187 84 (258 137 164 189 83 264 139 166, 192 B2 271 140 168 194 8.1 277 142 71 197 8.0 284 144 173, 199 79 291 146 175, 202 7.8 (299 148 177 (204 eit 307 150 180 207 76 316 152 182 210 75 325 154 184 213 74 (334 156, 187 215, 7.3 (344 158 189 218 7.2 355 160 192 221 7 367 162 195 225 7.0 379 165 198 228 69 392 406 421 437 455, 474 494 517 541 568 14DESIGN FACTOR, Cont. Rigs running with loads so light that their design factor is above 7.0 for extended periods of time will not be able to get expected ton-mile service. Laboratory tests ‘and actual field experience confirm that with light loads, the ton-miles add up so slowly that the wire rope will wear out in fatigue due to the higher number of bending cycles required to accumulate each ton-mile. ‘These high design factors are especially common on workover rigs. When this is the case, it is a good idea to make cuts more frequently than normal, perhaps every few round trips. Another problem is that a high design factor means that too many parts of line are strung. An excessive number of parts of string up puts extra rope on the drum where cross-over and wear take their toll on the life of the rope. The excessive length in the stringup takes more cuts to work through the reoving system, and consequently any section of rope is in the system longer than necessary before it is finally cut off. An example of using the fewest possible parts of string-up while still maintaining a sate rig operation and reasonable design factors is illustrated 1513/8" EIP Rotary Line CONSTANT WEIGHT T.B.A. Wt. = 40,000# + Drill Collar Excess Wt._92,871# (30 1384/Ft)= — 132,871# Total N_SURFACE &:PART STRING-UP MAXIMUM INDICATED LOAD 132,871# Constant Weight 296,310# Drill Pipe Weight 4-1/2" (16.6#/F t) 21,000 FEET —|| 429,818 (DESIGN FACTOR = 3.0) 10-PART STRING-UP MAXIMUM INDICATED LOAD 182,871# Constant Weight 388,025# Drill Pipe Weight 4-1/2" (16.6#/Ft.) TD. oR 27,500 FEET. U 5208968 (DESIGN FACTOR = 3.0) A 12-part string-up would be required for setting casing having a total bouyed weight of more than 480,000#. 16DRILL COLLAR WEIGHTS POUNDS PER FOOT Collar BORE OF COLLAR OD. 14/2 13/4 2 244 21/2 213/16 3 31/4 34/2 334 4 33/8 244922 312 267 245 33/4 315 293, 378 340 319 294 265 4° 36.7 345 320 292 418 304 9722 347 319 4a 422 400 375 347 412 480 458 433 405 43/4 542 520 495 46,7 43.5, 5 60.1 585 559 B31 49.9 Bia 675 653 628 599 568 533 512 747 725 099 672 639 605 567 534 821 799 75 746 715 679 641 6 809 878 853 825 793 758 719 678 632 614 98) 959 935 906 875 839 B01 759 715 612 1066 1045 1019 991 959 975 886 845 790 69/4 1155 1133 1108 1079 1048 1013 975 933 838 7), 246 1225 1199 1171 1139 1105 1086 1025 979 931 879 744 1341 191.9 1295 1266 1236 1199 116.1 1119 1075 1026 975 7U2 439 141.7 1393 1365 1333 1298 1259 1218 1173 1128 1073 73M 1541 1519 1495 1466 1435 1399 196.1 1319 1275 1226 1175 8 1846 1625 1599 1671 1639 1605 i466 1425 1379 1931 1278 81/4 1764 173.3 1708 1679 1648 1613 157.5 1533 1488 1439 1388 81/2 1866 1844 1819 1791 1759 1686 1725 1645 1599 1651 1499 83/4 1981 195.9 1939 1906 1874 1839 1801 1758 1714 1666 1615 8 207.8 2083 2024 1993 1958 1919 1878 1833 1788 1733 94/2 2324 2299 227.1 223.9 2204 2166 2124 2079 2031 197.9 10 255.9 263.1 2499 246.4 2428 2384 233.9 220.1 2239 1041/2 2833 2804 277.3 2738 2699 2658 2613 2564 251.3 " 306.9 302.4 2986 2944 2899 285.1 2799 APPROXIMATE TRAVELING BLOCK ASSEMBLY WEIGHTS (HOOK, BLOCK, ELEVATOR AND LINKS) Capacity — Tons 7 Weight — PoundsSTANDARD DRAWWORKS MODEL DRUM SIZE ALCO #8 17518" x 36" a9 20 x32 au 2a x36" #12 2a x 3k BREWSTER N2 10/4" x 40" 2 with Friction Cluteh x36" N-3 or 708, x34" Na x 37-18" Naa x37.3/4" NT. x30" Neaza 30" N20 32.14" Nas 18" NSS 18" x40" N75 20" x401/2" Nes 28” x49.5/8" N95 26" x 45-578" CABOT/FRANKS 658 1555/8" 844 14" 855 14" 1058 1" 1287 19-578" 2082 19.58 2346 23.110" 23465, 23.114 2550 25" CARDWELL A100 103i" K-150 13" K-200¢ 16" 2104, 18 K-280C and K-250 16" k 500 18 L350 15" x38” 4450 16" x40-1/0" 700 18" x 40-14" CONTINENTAL - Esco A860 20" x 45) A800 24 A100 28" A-1500, 32" cr 7 cz 30 c3 36 x62 CE 3000 35-118" x 61378" DES & DEL 54.10 30" x33" 02 2" x51-12) 03 24:12" x80" EB 305/83" x 93-1/2" EC 30" x33-1/2 ECA 30" x 3312 Eca 305/86" 33.172" Ecc 05/8" x41" €D 3a" xay EDA 3a" x515/8" EDE x 51-678" DES x81-5/8" EH x82 eH x68" FCA xt 636 x33-5/8" Gaz x30! 18 MODEL, DRUM SIZE 6-300 G-450 GA160 GA.260T GA350 GA-500 GB8-160T 68-250-T 68-360 GB500 68-800 Gc-350 GC500 1-46 Series 11.54 Series 4-750 41000 3-110 31250 31400 4.1600 2000 P5046, POM-36 POM-a6 13" or 18" PSG-45, ia SOR 16" B54 & UBLS 54 30” UB-5410& UBLS 5410 30" UH5a-A, 32 ws 20 GARDNER-DENVER 3000E 36 x60 2100€ or 210m 36 x60" 1500 or 1500M 31 x54" T1OOE or 1 100M, ar x82 800E or 800M 22 x 60° 700E 0° 700M 22 x40 5008 o 500M 18 x40 E2100 x 57-112" © 2500 x 87-1/2" £3000 x 61-1/2" £0900 £1200 £D-2100 x 5741/2" 0.2500, 87172" £0-3000, x 6172 ED Super 7-11 x50" ED$2100) x 57-112" €DS-2500 x871/2" EDS-3000 6112" 420 x37-3/4) 25 40.34 30 x 40314 H35 1 36-3/4' Ha? x 36.3/4" 438 x 38" Hao x 41-112" Has 35-12" 525 x 11/2" H-700 x42 4750 narra 4900 46 H-1000 x ar #1200 x50 2100 «57-179 1.2500 x 87-172"MODEL DRUM SIZE IDECO, continued 20 12318" x ana M25 12.38" x 40.3/4" M35, x 40-3/4' 750 x411/2" Jr. 142800 xs?" M2500 x57" Lucky 7-11 x46 HI x ay dr. Super 7.11 x 50" Super 711 x50" Super 750 xara PR-1050 6.1/2" RR 1360 x 46-172" 1360S x46-1/2" ‘MID CONTINENT v0 18" uss 18" U20 26.12" ua 12.3/4" u30 30 u34 12.3/8 u36 1 u4o 2 <49.1/8"" une 25 x 51-1/2" U-914A and & 27" x531/4" ustac 29" x 53-1/4" 1220 2a" x 5 NATIONAL, T2and T12S 123/84" 16 16" 1.20 and 7-208, 16” 125 15.13/16" 132 16" a5 18 Helicopter 4.10 18” 40. 15.13/16" 50 16" 50.8 20 55 and 55-P 22" rs 23.72" 80 25" 208 25" 80-UE 25 190 26-172" 110-M and 110-VE ar 125 28.314" 130 30” 160 36 370 18° 810 and 610-€ 20 x 46.304 1320:DE 30 x56 1320-UE and 1320-M 30 x56 1625-DE 36 xe1-1/4 1625.M 36 x61-1/6 One 26 24" x36" 96 30” “ay” ea. 16" x 26-112" 527 16 66 20) 860 22" 760 360 £2000 E3000 2000 M3000 19 MODEL DRUM SIZE ‘IME DRAWWORKS. SEE 500 18 x36 SEE 750 18 x36) POOL 750 18 x38) 7505. 20 x36 sis 20 x36 SL 5 fatter 1/82) 23 xd POOL 10008 22 xa" 1000 SL 22-172" aa SL? 22-172" x48 tooo c 25" «50° SL 1000 P 25" x50" SD 7e 25 x50 1500 st. 24 x 47-68) 1800 ¢ 27 x50 SL 1500 P. a7 x50 Pool 20008 22-172" x47 2500 M a2 x56 2000 £ 32 x56 3000 32 x56 803 20" x36 S05 22-172" xa 4000 © 42 x72 ‘TBA 2000 22.172" x87 5/8 SPENCER-HARRIS 3500 13.9/4" 5 92.3/8 5000 14 330-174" 8000 5 236-374) 7000 15 x40174 WHELAND B65 21 x40" B85 2 x37" 8.3200 26 x33" 28-3800 30" x38" WICH-TEX ROD & TUBING MACHINE Te2 85/8" x25" 30 85/8" x 315/80" C60 sto. 1035/4" x37" C6040 toga" x33" C6580 123/48" x 3793/16" C65HD x 37.13/16" E75 x 42.178" FS x30" £90 x40-1/8" WICH-TEX ROTARY RIGS. RS 1093/4" x 28.3/8" Ra 13/4" x 28-114" AS 1235/4" x 2058 RG 16" x 283/68 WILSON "75" Winchmobile x42" Super Winchmobile 39.172 65 x 39-172 or 35” 65P x39-1/2" 6 x42 5p. x 39-172" 90 (Super Giant) 120 (Super Atlash 150A (Super Titan "56") 250 (Super Titan "66")TON-MILES FOR JARRING DOWN (BUMPER JARS) Chart Is For One Pull” (Pulls from zero load to pipe weight plus & stroke and back) “Example Number 1. If approximately 26 pulls are made on 12.000’ of clear 5 (19.54) pipe the ton-miles accumulated are: 505 x 2 13 ton- miles Exemple Number 2: If approximately 100 pulls are made on 20,000 of clear 4-1/2" (16 6#) pipe. the ton-miles accumulated are 1.59 x 100 = 159 ton-mies,TON-MILES FOR JARRING UP. (on Jars) Chart Is For One Pull” (Pull is from 20,000 tbs. under pipe weight to 70,000 ibs. over pipe weight and back) eee ee ae gE ae Drill Pipe Size lin.) and Weight (lb/ft) Length are lsi2 a2] « [eve lere] 6 [eae ]ei2 ese (Feet) 133 | 185 | 140 | 166 | 200 | 195 | 219 | 247 | 262 7.009) ois 018 fore] ore] 13] ora] ois] 012] 012 2.000] 044] 039) 043] 039] 033} osa] 033] 030] 031 3.000] ove} 068] o74| osa| 059} 061} ‘o58] 055] 056 4.009} ig] 103] 111} toa} 082 | 095] 091] 086] 089 5.000 18] 145} ‘ts5] 146{ 131] 195] 131] 124] 128 6.000] 203] 192] 205] 195] 176] tet} 176] 168! 173 7.000] 267) 247] 262] 251] 228] 23a] 229] 219] 228 8.009] 331) 307 | 32] 313] 286] 293] 268] 277] 225 3.000] 401} 37a] 395] 382] 350] 359] 353) 341] 351 10.000] a7e{ 487] arr! a57| 21 | 31} 325] ari | 24 11,009] sei! 526] soa] 539] aos} sio] soa] ae] 504 12.009] 650) 612] 622} 62a] sei] 595] seo] 571] 590 13.009] rae] 704] 738] 723] 671] 685] 81] 661] 683 14.000} 105. 248] g02! sao] 925| 767] 754] 720] 758) 763 15.000] 1.17 987] vos] 968] 933] 870} seo] aes] g61| aso 16,000 1.30 307 | 1.02 | 108 | 105 | 978] 100 | 996] 870] 100 17,000] 144 19 faa fase fray fos faaz fais | vos | 12 18.000] 1.58 132 | 126 131 frg0 [122 fiz faze Paar | 125 19.000] 172 146 f 139 fras fas faze |ra7 | 137 | 134 | 138 20.000] 1.88 160 | 152 isa |rs7 [ras [isi | ist far | 152 21.000] 2.04 174 | ver J 173 | 172 | 162 | 165 | 165 | 162 | 167 22.000] 2.21 190} 181 | res J res {77 fro | reo | 176 | ia 23.000] 2.38 206 | 197 | 205 | 20a | 192 [196 | 196 | 192 | 198 24.000] 2.56 223 | 219 |221 | 220 | 208 J212 | 212 | 208 | ats 25.000] 2.74 240 | 230 [239 | 23a | 22a |229 | 230 | 225 | 233 26 000] 294 288] 247 | 256 | 256 | 242 | 247 | 247 | 242 | 251 27.000] 3.13 276 | 265 [275 | 275 | 260 | 265 | 266 | 260 | 289 28.000] 334 296 | 286 |294 | 293 | 278 | 204 | 285 | 279 | 260 28.000] 3.55 315 | 303 | 314 | 314 | 297 | 303 | 30a | 299 | 309 30,000] 277 336 | 323 [335 | 33s | 317 | 332 | a25 | 319 | 330 Example Number 1 If approximately 26 pulls are made on 12,000’ of clear 5° 119.5 # pine. the ton-miles aceumuleted are 595% 25 = 15 ton-mies Example Number 2 if approximately 100 pulls are made on 20.000 of clear 4-1/2" (16 641 pipe. the ton-miles accumulated are 1187x100 = 157 ton-miTON-MILES FOR WORKING CASING {Based on 30° Travel)” Weight Indicator Reading (1.000's of tbs.)TON-MILES FOR PULLING ON STUCK PIPE Chart Is For One Pull” (Pull is from 88% of pipe weight to 100,000 ibs. over pipe weight and back) “Example Number 1: if approximately 25 pulls ae made on 12,000" of clear 5° (19.54) pine. ae tile eerste ee ae Example Number 2: | approximately 100 pulls are made on 20,000" of clear 4-1/2" (16.64) pipe. ee ee eepi Gias PEE dr3puree ae, mee Peay mea | mes | geaans paypgebsen|ioal ate _fovaal seal Bf] ommre Lo = —bitgd: bagi ié eteireactieasPays 36pte taet tae