Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Future
Past and Present
Anu Jacob
The Walton Centre NHS FT, Liverpool
The interface
Neurology Oncology
PNS
Immunology
PNS – paraneoplastic neurological syndrome
Derek-Denny Brown
1901-1981
Clinical features of PNS
Russel Brain
Eaton Lambert
Pathophysiology and clinical signs of paraneoplastic
rheumatic syndromes
Antibody
Neuromyelitis optica Cancer
Aquaporin-4 IgG
Cerebellar Ataxia Pelvic /Breast malignancy
Ant-Yo-Antibody
Archives of
Neurology 2010
July 2011
Relative frequencies of the classical
PNS
238 (24.3)
979 European cases from 20 centres
98 (10.0)
345 (38.4)
380 (38.8)
NMDAR
Limbic
Encephalitis
GABA-A AMPA
MOG
J Dalmau, F Graus. N Engl J Med 2018;378:840-851.
PET-CT
Screening for suspected cancer
Titulaer 2011
Suspected First line Second line Third line
tumour
SCLC/Thymoma CT Chest or FDG-PET
Breast Ca. Mammography MRI Breast FDG-PET
Ovarian teratoma TV USS CT/MRI pelvis
Ovarian Ca. TV USS and Ca-125 CT/MRI pelvis FDG-PET
Testicular tumour USS, β-hCG, AFP CT/MRI pelvis Biopsy (if >50;
or calcification
in US)
Deramtomyositis CT/Thorax
USG pelvis +
Mammography/Testes
USG
If initial screen negative –
• Repeated after 3-6 months and
• Every 6 months for 4-5 years
• (2 years may be sufficient for LEMS)
• 31 patients with
SCLC+LEMS
• 279 with out LEMS
• LEMS offered
survival advantage
HR 1.76 (1.1-2.7)
• Some PNS respond better
– Encephalitis (LGI1,NMDARE),LEMS, OMS, MG
• Some poorly
– PCD, Hu related, myelopathy, autonomic
neuropathy , CARetinopathy
• IPFR fatigue
Approach to Treatment in PNS
Clinical, neuroimaging, serum Exclusion of other
and CSF evaluation disorders
• Mesothelioma
• 66 man
• Opsoclonus and cerebellar signs
• Mesothelioma and anti-Ma 2
• Poor response to IVMP, IVIg and PLEX
• Supportive care
• 37 female
• Sudden onset supranuclear palsy
• Headache and weight gain
• T2 changes hypothalamus, mesial temporal,
midbrain – cleared with chemotherapy
• Died
Future
Wish List
• Understanding the immune response against
the intracellular antigens
• Reasons for BBB breach
• T cell specific treatments
• Long term:
– Prevention and cure of cancers
– Targeted immunsuppression within the CNS
– Salvation of immunologic disorders may come
from understanding genetics !
Prgamatically..
1. Updated /upgraded Classification scheme is
needed
50
GFAP syndrome
• As common as Yo
antibody
• Linear perivascular
enhancement
51
3. It’s all too complex ?
Syndrome Cancer
Antibody
Neurologists delight in H-H approach
Is Arnie more practical ?
Should clinicians cut to the chase ?
• If :
– We can’t conclusively exclude a tumour
Why
– Variable presence of syndrome bother
– Early diagnosis and tumor removal is the with
best treatment for PNS antibodi
es ?
• Should we simply do
– PET-CT whole body + USG Testes or
Mammogram for most suspected PN
syndromes?
4. We need uniform antibody testing
panels and algorithms ?
• Patients first seen in general neurology clinics
• Testing based on
– syndrome
– knowledge
• Paraneoplastic antineuronal antibody
– tests depends on lab (type of test, cut offs)*
• Unrequested tests are not done
• Add on tests as afterthoughts
• No clear guidance with what to do with +ve result
Copyrights apply
Immune Check-Point Inhibitors
Immune checkpoint inhibitors can induce
worsen autoimmune diseases and
paraneoplastic diseases
• Mechanism ? similar to PNS; anti-tumour response, cross
reacts with CNS antigens
– Hypophysitis- hypopituitarism
– Encephalitis – within weeks (NMDAR -IgG+ve)
– Transverse myelitis
– GBS
– CIDP
– MG like
– CIS to MS
• Treat- stop ICI –drugs temporarily
• Steroids, IVIG
6. New treatments and trials in PNS
Title Drug Sponsor
Searched 19/3/18
Have we made true progress in treating PNS?
• Why ?
• Rare disorders are not any simpler than common ones
• Larger numbers of patients needed
• Only national/international collaborative efforts will
provide numbers
• Only well defined cohorts can offer biologic samples for
promoting research
• Only demonstration of a cohort of well characterised and
accessible patients and will attract pharmaceutical trials
• 20 regional neurological centres in UK
• Are neurologists unable to do true collaborative research
and develop treatment pathways?
• Each of these require interested experts-Champions- to
dedicate decades of their career
Acknowledgements
• Angela Vincent
• Geoff Keir
• Saiju Jacob
• Paul Maddison
• Immunology diagnostic labs at WCFT
Clinicians Dilemma
• All clinicians cant keep up with
• DDPX – clinician then reads up
• Refs – time
• Labs or clinicians will have to guide
• Poor prognosis – hesitant to take on
• MDT approach
• Immunotherapy
• Regional centres
How often do we find a positive
paraneoplastic antibody?
Antibody Number %
Hu 50 0.8
Yo 26 0.4
Ma2 10 0.16
CV2 5 0.08
Amphiphysin 3 0.05
SOX1 2 0.03
Tr 1 0.02
Ri 1 0.02
120, 000 patients screened
University of Birmingham
2000-2014
6232 patients screened
Strong
association
with cancer
Well characterised antibodies
• IHC patterns
• Assoc. with tumours
• Assoc. with syndromes
• Frequency in cancer
• Reproduced by different groups
Definite or Possible
• Oneline – protective effects
Cancer survival in LEMS (hypothesis)
Anti-VGCC binds to Ca channels on the surface of SCLC
1a cancer 1b cancer 1c 2a 2b
associated specific- but not Non PNS Typical CNS
pathogenically syndromes syndromes. But
related not necessarily
paraneoplastic
Hu (ANNA1) Sox GAD AMPA P/Q type
Ca+
channels
(lung Ca)
Yo (PCA1) Zic Adenylate GABAb MGlur1
Kinase (hodgkins)
Ri (ANNA2) Homer 3 Glycine
CV2 (CRM5), NMDAR
Amphiphysin
Ma2
Definite Vs Possible
Definite paraneoplastic syndrome
Encephalitis
NMDAR IgG
Pathogenesis of PNS in general