Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Bartle PDF
Bartle PDF
Vand
(ip) + (ig) = 1. Then fee Ls and Wels < [Pll le
‘moo. Let « be areal number satisyng 0 < « < 1, and consider
the function y defined for 1 > O by
wise
Wis easy to check that p() < Ofor0 << Land 't) > Ofer > 1
[i follows from the Mean Value Theorem of cleus that x0) > el)
and tt g(t) = ol) ifand only ifr = 1. Therefore we have
Hemsted, 930
1 a,b are nonnegative, and if we let ¢ = 8 and mliply by by ve
obtain the ieauality
ab" eat (1-0,
‘where equality hols if and only ifa = 6
Now let p and q satisfy 1 < p < oo and (1/p) + (1g)
= Hip. Ie follows tha if 4, B ave any nonnegative real nutes,
then
4) anc Se®
ro
‘Suppose that fe, and geL,, and that 1/], # 0 and Ugly #0,
The product fis measurable and (6.4) with A = [/(e/ fly and
= RGM tmplies that
eel LN, etaie
Since both ofthe terms on the right we inerabl, flows from
Corollary $4 and Theorem 5.5 that fei intgrabie Moreover, on
integrating we obtain
Titel, Sp *
ich Hider’ reuaty een
8 function in Lis iepbl when» > | an’ nthe ane
{ip + (i) = er esalenty. when p ba py. Toe tone
‘ating hielo ste ald Because teeta
{iat = te ol stemne nse
Teco in pe
610 Cavor-Buneaxowni-Scnuane equal, Uff end ¢
etn 16, eh fe tea nd
69 (fal < fur cits
511 Moowsr's IexauALY. If and & belong to bys p> Ty
then f+ Belongs to La and *
69, M+ A eft +
PROOF, ‘The cate 9 = 1 has already en tested, to we suppoxe
p> 1, Thesum/+ hisevidently measurabic Since
Uf Air < sup MUP < 2A" + 1H)
itfollows rom Corollary 54 and Theorem SS that /+ he, More
over,
(ODL AP + ALL APH UAL + A LL AP,
Since f+ he Ly then f+ Alt © La since p= (p ~ Nit follows tatSt The Fame of heaton
WMH tye Hence mean sppy MSR Ineualiy oat hat
Jr tes de cbf fis ama
Us + Ales
If we teat the second term on the right in (6.7) similarly, we obtain
Us AL < LLL + AIS + ly LF + Hr
=e + LI + AL.
M A= 1 + hig ~ 0, then equation 6.6) i tiv. 14 #0, we
‘an divide the above inequality by 4; since p ~ ply = 1, we obtain
‘Minkowski Inequality ano
iis readily seen hat the sce Lis linear sce and tha ort
(63) defines a nom on L,. The only nontrivial thing to be checked
‘cre the inequality 6.19) and this i Minkowski's Inequality. We
shall now chow that fe complete under this orm in the Following
6.12 Denwmow. A sequence (in Ly is & Cauchy sequence ia
1 if For every positive number € there exists an 46) such that i
BBs ina ia ~fhip <8. sequenee Uy) Ly 1 me
‘ergentto fin Ly if for every postive mumber « there exists am Nl)
such that ifm > (9, then [f— fl, < . «A normed liner space is
complete i every Cauchy sequence coaverges to some clement of the
613 Leon. te sequence (fe) converses 6 fin yy then i @
Cauchy sequence.
PROOF. msm > N(f2), then
0 Show thet
there evista set Ee X with (El) < 4 such that if FeX and
FOE =0, 000 Lfarly ©
6.Q. Let fetyX.Xin), 1S p O, then there exists a set Ey © X with p(E,) < 0 such that
FeXand FOE, = 6, then BAF) < «fo(4 The Ermens ofeteration
6S, Let fa be a8 inthe Exercise &R, and suppose that (is 2
‘Gaveny sequence. IF e> 0, then tere ext a e) > U such hat
Fe and y(F) 0 there
‘exists @ natural number N() such that ifm > N(@) and x€.X, them
‘The sequence (/)couveres pointwise 10 fi for every «0 and
x6 X there isa matral number M(c, x), such that ifn > (2), then
Mie) ~ 709) <«
“The canennn () comergee
tM in X with (M) = O such that for every © > O and ve X\ MEere exss a natural number (1), such mat IE 2 MEE, 9), then
Lee) - 0) 8
tis obvious that uniform convergence imple pointwise convergence,
that pointwise convergence implies lest everywhere convergence, and
itis cay scm that the reverse implications donot hold. (Of eourse,
{FX conse of only a finite number of points, then poitwite eon
‘vergence implies uniform convergence; ifthe ony st with measure
Zero 16 the empty set, then almost everywhere convergence implies
pointite convergence)
CONVERGENCE. IN L,
We now recall the nouon ot convergence nL, which was introduced
in Chaper © Weremark that an element in Ly ean equivalence ease
of functions which ae eabvalued and whos th powers are integrable.
However, by exercising some caution, we may regard an element of Ly
os ling 4 eaiaiued wemurabe fonction,
A sequence Ue) in Ly = LX. Xu) eomnergen fa 1 10 fF if foe
every e> O there ens a natural mimber (0) such that ifm 3 N(@),
then
U-Ae= {fis ae}” 0, then its uniformly convereaton the complement of18 The tienen of gration
he se(0, However, show that there doesnot exist ast of measure
ro, on the complement of whih fe uniformly convergent
7K. Show that the seauence in Exercive 78 converee aloe
tniformly bat not in Ly.
‘LL: Show thatthe sequence in Exercise 7.D converges everyeher,
ot mot alist uniformly
TM, Let f= mye Show that the hypothesis thatthe tii
{enction be fit (atleast almost everywhere) cannot be dropped in
Eporot’s Theorem,
TN. Show that Fatou's Lem lolds if almost everywhere cone
‘erence i replaced by conve
70. Show that the Lebesgue Dominated. Converence Theotem
bods if almost everywhere convergence is replaced by convergence in
Vili Convergence Theorem 7.13 ae satise.
10, LeU, Xs pDbeafine mesrespacefisanXneaurable
‘ction
: = rein
Sow tat a sequence Ud) of Xesurbe factions cones in
neautetofifand nie ee
ae sequence of menial fain emer inst
wert to 4 mete enon fan yncontnooe ee tee
then te equate (7) comergs inet ere toeel Con
ves if not cotnsusateve pam the hee ex a eqns
(wb cones tant rye oft uh thal oo) ees
bot comets eee ing
18. swift continuo RoR, and if (2) comers
vaio" especie, nat ur, nme tof ee
{esi ena peas wen tea)
Uo pef. Comer if» an any cominaen tee ei
Ie space and a tune) comeing uno fad fae
it woriy a a tenn to at uh at abet
comer in meas (a ene oily o nn sxe
topes. 7
1 Mt 14.0) Bea Site menor space a kt 1 ¢ p<,
Latte comtianuson Rs Ran aye coat) ee aes
Koons tt io) < Kili > K. Shown eae
Lalreach fet,” Cones do not wi 0) enh
Acne te ene ace chit Flos,
ou
2. MU comets 6 fn on te mene pn itp
1 coins sd sats conan) af ace ts i)
sss in pr. Comer eon) hea
ther is afi meer a setuens Upon
ints o/tat uch at ge fdas antcomege el ea
UV, tet 1.39) bea arbiry mest ace Le 9 ben
io) tere ets K 30 ah tht
In) < Kil frareR. Wel nen Fecmrg occa
se» docs ot satay oe es « mete ee ss
Econ 0 sch a pant Bang oe
ity scaminoar and aii Favomeretoy fn
Coney dows ot sity) asa ene
ssvens Uo) stcrcontren 0 ae ag eek
cower ate inastCHAPTER 8
Decomposition of Measures
In this chapter we shall consider the possibilty of decomposing
measures and charges in vanous ways and shall obtin some very
fl rele. Ft we shall consider charges and show thats eharge
‘an be writen asthe diference of two finite measures.
We real from Definition 3.6 that a charge on a measurable space
(4X) in a reabvali felon 4 dein on the evlgea 2 al
1uQ) = O and whichis countably adtve inthe sense that
-de
forany disjoint sequence (E,) of sets in X.‘The reader can easly check
the proof of Lemmas 3.3 aud 34 to show that f (Esa atoning
sequence of ses in X, thea
en (0%) = tae,
nat (5 2 decreasing Sequence ost in X, then
62 (GF) = Hin a.
81 Denon, IfAisa charge on X, then a set Pin Xis sid tobe
pve with respect to Aif MEA P) > 0 for any Bin X. Aset Nin
Xe said tobe negative with rept to AF(E A N) < O for any Ein
X. A set M in Xis sid to be a ell set for Aif MEM M) = 0 for
‘any Bin X,
Deconpston of Meances 8)
tis anexerie to show that a measurable subset of a positive sets
Postve and shat the union of two postive set 3 poutine ret
8.2 Haun Deconrostmon Tionen, 172 & a charge on X, then
there exit ste P and Nin X wih X= PUN, PAN = 0, and such
‘that Pi postice and W i negate with respect fo
nooF. The cass P ofall postive ses isnot empty singe it must
contain at least. Leta = sup (Ad) Ae P) let (4) be a sequence
sm Psuen nat hm 44) = «and et P = Ute, qe Since the union
fof two potiive sre postive, the sequence (4) ean be ehosen to be
‘monotone increasing, and we shall assume hat this hat been done.
(Clearly Pi a postive set for, since
ae F) = EOL) A) =A() 64g) = tn HE AD > 0
Moreover, « ~ fm Ate) ~ MP) < 2.
‘We shall now show that the set W = X'\ Pisa negative set. fact,
there isa measurable subset £ of N with ME) > 0.” The set Ecannot
‘bea positive se, fortien PU & would bea postiveset with APU E) >
contrary ta the definition fa Henor Fsntaine sete with negative
charge: let m be the smallest natural number such tht E contains et
in X, such hat ME) < =H. Now
ME\ E) = ME) ~ ME) > ME) > 0;
however, EE; cannot be a postive st, for then P, = PU(E\E)
‘would be positive set with P)) > a. Therefore EE; contains
sets with nepativ charge. Let be the smallest natural number such
that EE, contains a set Ein X such that ME,) < Ing. AS before
E\(,v £4) isnot a pose set, and welt m5 be the salt natal
umber auch that (EU F,) canine 2 tt Ein ¥ such that
YE) < —Hiny. Repeating this argument, we obtain a disjoint
sequence (E,)afsets of X sch that ME) <
wn $aee-$
‘which shows that I.» 0. IF Gis a measurable subet of E\ Fand(The Bement of eeration
AG) <0, then AG) < — tly = 1) for eaciently large ene
leading the fat that my i the smallest natural number such that
E\(E,U--"U E,) contains a et wth charge ls than ~I/ne. Hence,
‘very measurable bse G of £\ Femur hake NG) > 0, 20 hat BF
fs 4 otve set for 2. Since ME\ F) = ME) — (FY > 0, we infer
that PU CE £) isa postive set with charge exceeding a, which is a
“Therefore, it fllows that the st N'— XP ta negatives for 3,
and the dsied decomposition of Xis obtained ato,
A paie PLN of meacurahle sets stisving the conclusions of the
preceding theorem i sid to form 2 Hahn decomportion of X with
respect (0A, In general, thee il be no unique Hahn decomposition
In fot if P,N ib Hab decomposition for 3, and if Mea all et
for 3, then PUM, N'\M and PM, NU Mare abo Hahn decom:
postions for A. This lack of uniqueness not an important mater
‘or mos purposes, however
83 Lown. P.M; and Pas Ny are Hah decompositions for,
MEO KY)
MEDP MEON) = MEDND.
‘oor. Since £7 (P\ is conned inthe postive se, an in
the neane set Ny then (EM (P|) = 050 tat
MENP) = MEO POPD.
son ncn
Wenn) -aen ews
ts bapa tt name nti
alee er
69 MGA MEND, 9 (8) MEOW,
‘The total aration of i he measur i defied for Zin X by
IME) = arte) — ae.
in « comequeise of Lemma 83 thatthe pone and negative
variations are welldtined and donot depend am the Haba decompo
tion. Its ako clear that
(84) NE) = MEAP) + NEON) = 4B) —
‘We shall stat this result formally
AS Jonoan Decowrosmox Tueonim, If isa charge on X. ti
the difernce of two Fite measures on X. In particular, \ i the
Sifrence of 4° ana A. Moreover, y A= 4» where Kyw are
finite measures on ¥, thon
as WE) > CE), ME > UE
forall Ein X.
raoor. The fepieseutation A — A*—A~ ay aleady bee clade
lided. Since w and» have nonneeative vale. then
A) = MEAP) = MEO P)- HEMP)
SHED?) < HE)
2°(B) HE) forany Bin X. azo.
We have sees, in Lemma $2, that ia function fs integrable with
respect toa measure wom X, and if is define for Ein X by
an 1) = [44
then A i a chars, We now identify the postive and negative
sation of
86 Twonam. ffbelongs to LX, Xn), and is defined by euaton
then A", A", nd | re piven fr 1 in X by
ae fi pre, WUE) = faa,
Me) ~ [ie
@The Bnet of nterton
rroor Let Py = {ee ¥=fle) > 0) and Ny ~ (eX: fl0) <0}
Then X= P,UN; and FON, = 9. Ee X, then it lar that
MEM P) > 0 and MECN) <0. Hence PH isa Habn decon-
Poston for A. The statement now fll. gun,
was seen in Covllary 49 Wat ifs « nonnegative extended rea
‘valued measurable function an isa measure on X. then the function
A defined by equation (Be) is a measure on X. There is very
Important converse to this which gives conditions under which one
can express ¢ measure as an integral with respect 10 p of 2 non
negative extended seabvalued measurable function. Tt was seen in
Corollary 4.11 that a necessary conliton for this representation is
that ME) = 0 for any set £m Tor which ie) = 0. It turns out
fie
87 Dernwmon. A measure on Xis sid tobe aboltelyconinoous
respect to a measure pon X it EEX and lB) = O umply that
YE) = 0. To thi caze we write Hep. A charge 2 in abuately
‘oatinwous with respect to a charge «in ease te total variation [i of|
2s absolutly continuous with respect ofa
The following lemma is useful and adds to our intuitive under.
sande of absolute continuity.
88 Lota, Let A ond pe frie meaner on X. Then AS pf
ond ony if for every « > O there exit @ Xe) > O such thar EX ond
HE) < imply hat ME) <
R008. I ths condition is satisfed and p{E) = 0, then XE) < €
Conversely, suppose that there exist an « > O and sets EX with
© Let Fy =Ursa Fe 90 that ED <
3 Ay) > €. Since (Fi) decreasing sequence of metsurable
al
st
a(R) = i
Menge Ais not absolutely continuous with respect to aso,
9 RADONNTKODYN THEOREM, Let A and u be finite measures
Then there exist a fantion f in M*(X, X) sch th
8 ME)= f fam, ed
Moreoe, te fnctonf is wiuely deine alos everywhere.
"oF. We shal int prove Theorem 89 unde he hypotess that
200) 20 pl) at faite,
We > 0,1 (0, Nl) be a Haha ecomposon of for he charge
d= an WKEN, comider the measurable set
ARN cm mle a ny
eis ear tat he set A, ae ola and that
809 = Ua,
Ie follows that
v= MONT NUS = Nok FY Pe.
Hence if £is a measurable subet of 4, then ES Nike) and B=
Pk — 1) so at
en (= Deal) < NE) & ke.
DebneB by
B=
So that 8 PUke) forall ke N. This imple that
0-6 bel) nad obs tat
[ame nes [ners mar
[pt ets € fates et,
Me
for al Fin XI we let E be the sts wheve the integrand i pone
and negative and combine, we deduce that
Jin maceuan
Jal 62-*90,
whenever m > n. Thus the sequence (f) converges in mean to a
funtion, Since the f beh Co M's cleat from Uheotem 1.6
that we may require that fe M™. Moreover,
[poe fra s fin-siae « fin sien
soa we cod on (8) a
apy etm fae fra
win fae |
for a 2 X. ‘This completes the prof ofthe existence asetionof|
the theorem inthe ete where both Nand rw Bnitemeasutes
Inde spo hat fe ad tat
May fs foe
fora Ein X. Let E, = (x: te) > Mat) and Ey = le: fs) < Ke),
nd apply Corollary 410 infer that fi) = 3) almost everyuon
‘We shall now supmine that A and are eine and let (2) te oe
increasing sequence af ete in ¥soch that
AOD 0
for allfeL, for which > 0)
4413 Leow. Let G be a handed timer fnctional om bys Then
there exist two positive bounded linear functionals G* > sack thot
8) = GY) ~ FU) forall feb,
fmoor. IF £0 deine G*UN) = sup (G8) :£6Ly, O68 1i(t-2)
Here fiat KX oie of wih al he fan,
Let EeX with £7 Xy = 8 then [fe A taely = (E+ er ED" bon
13.0. Moreover, since
OU) ~ 4 tae) < 10h 8 Hale
tae
tna «wt + ey =~
dh
fet +0 and hen dive by «+ 0, ge
forall in N.
er afey = 1
Noten < joy LP HME” =
‘we appiy UHopiars mae a 1-0, wer tat Gas) = 0, for
any Fe inthe omplemen a he who et en Thereof
is any fection in, suc hat Kym ve ¥ 1/00) #0} = 8. flows
tat Gy) = 0.
on Xy whic represent, nd extnd eto al of by reauting that
fvansh onthe compen ff ahi ay we en he eed
function, ‘azo,
EXERCISES
8.8. ICP is a positive set with respect to charge A, and if Ee
snd E = P, then £15 postive with respet to
8B. IEP, an Mate postive sets fOr & charge A, thea Py UP is
positive for 2.
SC. Aset Min Xisanullsetforacharne Aitand onlvit (My ~ 0,
8D. IFAs charge on X, then the values of 4 are bounded and
AE) = sp (UA): Fs E, Fe),
2) = =n HE): Fs E,FeX)
SE Let pasa and be measures on (XX), Show that 1.
Let E,= (x: eC) 3 clGIl, and define (0) tm he il when
als) > el] and to be 0 when 14 E.. Then
IGE) < OU) < IoIE),
{EAI 4 sommaicton unless (E) = 0, Infer that [| < FG)
8.U. I satises (10) forall fe, show that ey and that
161 = isle
'S¥, Ihe Riesz Representation Theorem forp = 2 canbe proved by
some elmentary Hilbert pace geometry (se [3h p. 249-50, Wena
show that this result can be uted to prove the Radon Nikon
‘Theorem. We shal limit our atetion to finite measures vu with
hem Lee at wand show that
Gy) = [fa
defines postive tinea functional on LX, X.») with norm at most
ge LAX, X,») i such that,
C= fee, setcxn.
then we see by taking fv xe, FX, that O.¢ (2) « 1 for manos
all, Moreover, p(x: g(0) = 1} = 0, Sincer'= Ag. we have
froma frase
for all noaveyaive he La(X,%,¥) and hence for all nonnegative
measurable. Now take bn. sy
woCHAPTER 9
Generation of Measures
Inept ie eft
st tet reyes tem sooo
Mens steerer pus wags oar ons
Sora ite so as Fee eage
on
Tran en hg apn ine ee
evainamarh ad ehroprofonsae( eh eee
Poh tnd sta) Skene st on Fah wb
sel inte We di age wt
‘Srey tT han
Yenst » See
ree et tite
‘ign i a ee ete ea
al Pfs ch ne oie ne
Cath (asbh tva), cata,
Monet te ce in mae nan et Fs
‘occa otha Fumstsoatsn trae ob
=
21 Done fey da et i ea
seer tn
:
3
med
Ter sont dee te tn et oa
Inger om en
pieelsatncnntetionetrta
wcren Tin cen a eS
Soro cormnee sma dtl dank
Shomer ee Jc eee 8
0,4) = 5 en
mom asm rt eas
care emmy de
23 tau so a fe oft of form
obec mel hfe mls fat of
sata ent aescnapntnee mia oomaaTe
Suonorianiaccgemyae im, eee Gite
Sima Weal cern aceite a
carp as Me fe om
93 (o.t= fhe.
Where the intra fo, ace Becca fene dd be
ny fit collection of such intervals and suppose tha
ees ere rs
(This may cequite a renumbering ofthe indices, but it cam always be
suum) Now .
Zoo = 5-9
0 be arbitrary, and let (6) be a sequence of
postive numbers with Se) < e. By renumbering, if necetary, we
"Now consider the open intervals
(3 ~ sind +40),
N= Cub te, />2,
In view of (22) follows that the open sts: ¢N} form a covering
i, Taser, is inert covered 0
finite amber ofthe intervals sav by the interval To, Iu. RY
‘renumbering and discarding some exta intervals we may ase that
Ce ee ee ee
1 follows from this chain of inequalities that
boacbe red ae Sty ea- on
ky the above estimate shows that
(£0 X50) ~ gh] 99) (eX [M) — ef > 8M)
sh,
Thertore wre X= Ie) 0), 9) < lh) <4 for aj
0 that (g) converges in measure tf ono,
77 Conousany. Let (i) be 2 sequence of measurable rescued
faxctons which is Cauchy in measure. Then there isa measrale ral.
‘ealued funtion {10 which the sequence converges im measire. ‘Ths
fasion fs uniuely deveined aimee everywhere
reoor. We have sen that there ita subseauence(f,) whieh com
verges in messure to a function f- To see thatthe ene sequence
‘enrenge in measure, Ober tat nee
7) ~ 1 1809 0 + Ll) — fae
i fatwa tat
Gre: Ute) —Hla) 2 os {re x: a) ~ Agent > $}
Ulver veer fiot>
‘The convergent in measute of (J, {0 1oUo¥s from the relation.
‘SuoD0ie thatthe sequence) am
Since
17) ~ x60 = 109) = 101 + Late) ~ at.
it Fits that
Grex: I0) ~ a0] 9 0) s {re x: 19 - 1401 > $}
so tat Ure x: Inte) ~ ato» 3,
More X17) ~ at] > a)
orale > 0. Takinge = Un, nN, we infer that f= g, 20. ae.
1s been remarked that convergence in , implies convergence in
measure In perl, convergence in measure dues wt in come
Yergence in ly Ge Exercise 7). However, this implication does hold
nen the convergence is dominated,
1.8 Thome, Let) be a Sequence of fnctions in Ly which com
erase be meas 10 fad let gb be 0h that
Wool <4), ae.
Then feb, and) sonmergsin Ly tof.
mone If does to fs xi subsequence
(es) off) and ane > 0 such that
an In-/>© for ken.12 The Emon of bertion
Since (isa subsequence of (it follows ee Exercise 7.6) that it
converge in memure 10 /. By Theorem 7.6 thete isa subsequence
{h) of (a) which converses almost everwhere and in measure to &
function h. From the uniqueness part of Corollary 7. it follows that
‘n= Jae. Sioce(h) converges almost everywhere to Jand is dominates
by g, Theorem 72 implies that 1h, fl, +0. However, thie
contradict the elation (7.7) een
ALMOST UNIFORM CONVERGENCE
Inthe proof of Theorem 76 we contre a sequence (g) of
imeturble rabvelued Tenens which was wifermly somerset on
{be complement of ses which have aitariy small measure AL Sst
mention th Sounds equivalent to uniform convergence outside a set of
22f0 measure, Outs not equivalent (ee Exes 14)
79 Dunn A seucine (of weasel fos to
be almost ifr convereat (0 measurable anton Ff for each
85 Other isa set yin wih (Zs) <8 such that (/)comergs
‘unoriyto,fon X\ Bs The sequence Ua) std foe an almost
switormtyCaccy sequence if for every 5~ O there exits 2 at Ein Y
vith o) <8 such that (is uniformly convergent on
‘The reader i warned thatthe terminology (ination to ting
pleasant) shy at varias withthe eater we ofthe moder
almost” Is elear tht almost uiform convergence ie impnd
uniform converpence, but it i nt batd tose tha almost eriform
convergence doesnot imply this stronger mede.
140 Lev, Let (J) be am abestaniformly Couhy sequence.
siformiy ed lst ecerehere tf.
moor. IF 6, ft Ee Be sch that (E) < 2° and (fy i
uniformly convergent on XE. Let Fy = Un, s0 that eX
fod) < 2-9". Nota (9 cones wifonly on KF, =
Y\ Band dee by
le) limite, 6 Bs
=a rok
Moder of Comerrnce 7
‘We observe thatthe sequence (Fis decreasing and hat if F = (VF,
then Pe Nand xf) = 0. Ih A, then aye) = RCs FOF a Fy
“Therefore. the seauence(e.) converges on all of tn a mescirahe
limit fonction which we shall denote by f. If ¢ Fy then f(3)
M(x) = lm jx). It olows that converges to fon X\F, so that
Ui) converges tof almort everywhere on
“To see that the convergence is almost uniform, le > 0, and let
bbe so large that 2-0" ce. Them (fy) 0 Be sciary and foreach m choo 2
sequene (Eq) of Stn Asch at
ashe ant Sut