Professional Documents
Culture Documents
SUBMITTED TO:
Shah Md. Taha Islam
Lecturer
Department of Accounting Information Systems
Jahangirnagar University
Savar, Dhaka-1342
SUBMIITED BY:
Dalia Afrose (Id: 1661)
Noara Fahmida (Id: 1668)
Tanjil Hassan (Id: 1684)
Asif Raihan Chy (Id: 1693)
Md Rakibul Hassan Nahid (Id: 1696)
Md. Mehedi Hasan (Id: 1698)
Aklima Begum (Id: 2440)
8th Batch
Department of Finance & Banking
Jahangirnagar University
Savar, Dhaka-1342
SUBMISSION DATE:
October 31, 2019
e. Calculate and interpret price to sales (P/S) ratio for each firm.
Sales per share for Apex Foods Ltd.=Total Sales / Total Number of Share
=1,712,436,974/ 5,702,400
=300.30
Market Price per Share: 209.40
P/S ratio for Apex Foods Ltd.=Market Value per Share / Sales per Share
=209.40 / 300.30
=.697
Sales per Share for Agricultural Marketing Company Ltd. =Market Value per Share / Total
Number of Shares
=2,538,528,750 / 8,000,000
=317.32
Market price per Share of AMCL: 233.30
P/S ratio for Agricultural Marketing Company Ltd. = Market Value per Share / Sales per Share
=233.30 / 317.32
=.74
g. Using the method of comparable, estimate a value for selected companies (determine value
for one company).
We will attempt to value National Tea Company Ltd using the method of comparable. National
Tea Company Ltd. and two firms that produce similar type products. All of them are from Food &
Allied industry. The price to sales (P/S),price to earnings (P/E), and price to book (P/B) ratios for
Apex Foods Ltd. and Agricultural Marketing Company Ltd. are based on their market Value in
June 2018.National Tea Company Ltd. is valued by applying the average of Multiples for the
comparison firms to NTC Ltd sales, earning, and book values. The three multiples give three
different valuations for NTC Ltd. a bit awkward. So, the valuations are averaged to give a value.
Tittle Sales Earnings Book Value Market Value P/S P/E P/B
h. Asset based valuation can be applied for the Foods &Allied industry.
Asset-based valuation is a form of valuation in business that focuses on the value of a company’s
assets or the fair market value of its total assets after deducting liabilities. Assets are evaluated,
and the fair market value is obtained. The asset-based approach uses the value of assets to calculate
a business entity valuation.
Asset- based valuation is not without drawbacks. For applying asset-based valuation some
difficulties should be faced. They are given below:
Assets listed on the balance sheet may not be traded often, so market values may not be
readily available.
Market values if available, might not be efficient measures of intrinsic value if markets for
the assets are imperfect.
Market value, if available, may not represent the value in the particular use to which the
asset is put in the firm. One might establish either the current replacement price for an asset
or its current selling price, but neither of them may be indicative of its value in a particular
going concern.
The omitted assets must be identified for their market value to be determine. The very term
intangible asset indicates a difficulty in measuring value. Accountant list intangible assets
on the balance sheet only when they have been purchased in the market. Because only then
is an objective market valuation available.
Even if individual assets can be valued, the sum of the market values of all identified assets
may not be equal to the value of the assets in total.
i. Apply the valuation technologies that you have learned in your FSA 303 course to
estimate a value for a selected company. (Hints: Pretend that you are sitting at the
beginning of 2014. Use a required return of 10 %.)
2018 2017
=26.72%
𝑁𝑒𝑡 𝐹𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑙 𝐸𝑥𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑒 (𝑁𝐹𝐸)
Net Borrowing Cost (NBC) =𝐴𝑣𝑒. 𝑁𝑒𝑡 𝐹𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑙 𝑂𝑏𝑙𝑖𝑔𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 (𝑁𝐹𝑂)
140
= × 100
3573
=3.91%
b. Calculations of FLEV:
𝐹𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑙 𝑂𝑏𝑙𝑖𝑔𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 (𝐹𝑂)
Financial Leverage (FLEV) =𝐴𝑣𝑒.𝐶𝑜𝑚𝑚𝑜𝑛 𝑆ℎ𝑎𝑟𝑒ℎ𝑜𝑙𝑑𝑒𝑟 𝐸𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑡𝑦 (𝐶𝑆𝐸)
3573
=19332
= .1848
c. Calculations of ROCE:
Return on Common Equity (ROCE)= RNOA+ [FLEV×(RNOA-NBC]
= 26.72%+ [.1848× (26.72-3.91)
= 30.93
d. Calculations of PM, ATO and Showing RNOA= PM×ATO:
𝑂𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝐼𝑛𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑒 (𝑂𝐼)
Profit Margin (PM) = 𝑆𝐴𝑙𝑒𝑠
6121
=28857 × 100
= 21.21%
𝑆𝑎𝑙𝑒𝑠
Assets Turnover =𝐴𝑣𝑒. 𝑁𝑒𝑡 𝑂𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝐴𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑡𝑠(𝑁𝑂𝐴)
28857
= 22905
= 1.26
RNOA= PM×AT =21.21% ×1.26
= 26.72%
18451
= 28857 × 100
= 63.94%
𝑂𝑝𝑒𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝐼𝑛𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑒( 𝑎𝑓𝑡𝑒𝑟 𝑡𝑎𝑥)
Operating Profit Margin Ratio (OPMR)= × 100
𝑆𝑎𝑙𝑒𝑠
5453
= 28857 × 100
=18.90
6121
= 28857 × 100
= 21.21%
QUESTION 3
A critical evaluation of different financial statement analysis techniques:
Financial statement analysis is often reported to senior management and the board of directors.
They use this information of the Financial Statement Analysis as input in the decision-making
process. The Financial Statement Analysis is also used by external parties, such as investors and
supervisory bodies to gain insight into organizations. There are several Financial Statement
Analysis methods and techniques that can be used to analyses a balance sheet and a profit and loss
account.
QUESTION 4
Explanation regarding the question no. 4 has given below:
The return on common equity, or ROCE, is defined as the amount of profit or net income a
company earns per investment dollar. The investment dollars differ in that it only accounts for
common shareholders. This is often beneficial because it allows companies and investors alike to
see what sort of return the voting shareholders are getting if preferred and other types of shares are
not counted.
Return on common equity is a measure of how well a company uses its investment dollars to
generate profits. Often times, it is more important to a shareholder than return on investment (ROI).
It also tells common stock investors how effectively their capital is being reinvested. Generally, a
company with high return on equity (ROE) is more successful in generating cash internally.
Investors are always looking for companies with high and growing returns on common equity;
however, not all high ROE companies make good investments. Instead, the better benchmark is to
compare a company’s return on common equity with its industry average. In conclusion, the higher
the ratio, the better the company.
In the analysis of ROCE, it broke down inti its drivers. And it works in 3 level. I first level it
analyses the effects of financial leverage and operation leverage. Then in second, the effects of
profit margin and asset turnovers on operating profitability. In third level the analysis proceeds
individual margin of profit margin, asset turnover and net borrowing cost.
Explanation of the measurement how they drive ROCE:
I. Profit margin made up a positive effect on the ROCE
II. Net borrowing cost (NBC) affect the ROCE negatively
III. The affection of operating leverage (OLLEV), it depends on the spread of it.
IV. Spread can affect the ROCE both positively or negatively
V. Financial leverage affects the ROCE with the measurement of spread.
VI. Asset turnover affects the ROCE positively.