Professional Documents
Culture Documents
How To Become A Researcher PDF
How To Become A Researcher PDF
A RESEARCHER?
Published by
www.cafetinnova.org
CAFET-INNOVA Technical Society
1-2-18/103, Mohini Mansion, Gagan Mahal Road, Domalguda
Hyderabad – 500 029, Andhra Pradesh, INDIA
Website: http://www.cafetinnova.org
Mobile: +91-9866587053
Regd: 1575
The chapters published in this book have been peer reviewed by experts and the authors
are solely responsible for content of the chapters published in this book.
All rights reserved with CAFET-INNOVA Technical Society. No part of this book should
be translated or reproduced in any form, Electronic, Mechanical, Photocopy, Recording
or any information storage and retrieval system without prior permission in writing,
from CAFET-INNOVA Technical Society.
PREFACE
“Imagination is more important than knowledge” – Albert Einstein
The aim of this book is to provide necessary information about basics of research
and the actual methodologies applied while doing research. Highlighting the
details of technical writing followed by both academic and commercial research.
Describing the importance of technical events and publications along with
explaining the various preventive steps taken against plagiarism, infringement,
counterfeits, etc. Presentation skills are also included to guide researchers to
market their research ideas.
Special thanks go to Suchismita Mallick for her great support in maintaining high
standards of the book with her proof-read, and Pradeep Kumar Das for sharing his
creative ideas that turned into the cover page of this book.
I gratefully acknowledge the support from Professor Suresh Kumar, Dr. Neelima
Satyam, Dinesh Pandian, Mohd Abubakr, Prakash Raju, and Nafeesa Parveen.
Finally, this book “How to become a Researcher?” would not have been possible
without the confidence, endurance and support of P. Nikhil Prakash and Raju. A
Hafeez Basha. R
Editor – “How to become a Researcher”
Contents
This chapter isn’t about theorems, lemmas or prepositions.s. This chapter is a about human phycology. To
be precise, this chapter is about phycology of researchers and their life.. We will discuss about ab
researchers, their life, the decisions they make and how a researchers can make best use of their talent.
But how do researchers live life through research? Research isn’t merely about writing research papers
or inventing machines. There
re is much more to it. The process of writing a research paper doesn’t merely
start from the time researcher holds the pen. A lot goes on behind the scenes. In order to make
1|Page
How to become a Researcher?
discoveries or inventions, a researcher must have the unquenchable thirst for knowledge, unceasing
passion for discovering the truth and unending zeal to fight against failures. The greatest of ideas occur
only to those who experience highest amount of failure and yet don’t give up.
Some say that the greatest pleasure that a human can experience is immortality. And research gives that
pleasure. Successful research makes the researcher immortal. The names of researchers are echoed
with respect for centuries and millennia by all civilizations. Their names become synonymous with
human excellence and intellectuality. Even after 350 years since his times, the name of Newton is known
to more than 3,000 million people on this planet. It speaks volumes of the fame research gives to a
human being. And this is not the kind of fame that dies down with the decline of power. This is the
immortal kind of fame that would remain forever.
However, research is heart-breaking too. Sometimes the problems don’t crack even after lifetime of
effort and many researchers had lived such lives. In the rapidly changing technological fields, there is
deep-throat competition on new ideas. One idea replacing another within no time is very common.
Naturally, not all researchers gain the fame of the likes of Newton or Einstein. There have been
numerous researchers who have produced outstanding ideas, yet they are little known outside their
research circles. Though the fame depends on the kind of discovery the researcher has done, fame isn’t
the primary reasons why researchers do research. They do research because they want to do research. If
fame follows, it’s not their fault! However, on many occasions, depending on the popularity of the
problem, researchers know the fame it would fetch when they solve such a problem. (Ask a researcher
who is trying to solve one of the Millennium problems!) The desire for such fame can be tricky.
Sometimes it motivates and sometimes it distracts. Also, on many occasions, discoveries happen all of a
sudden and even to the surprise of the researcher. Researcher might be solving a much lesser known
problem but somehow an idea leads to discovery of much higher magnitude. Bottom line is that,
researcher don’t do research for fame. And those researchers who do research for fame seldom
succeed.
The common misconception among people is that research only relates to fields of science and
technology. This is not true. Research is fundamental to all fields of knowledge, whether be it arts,
sports or sciences. So what is research? Depending on your sensibility, the answer to this question can
be simple or complicated. Curiosity for knowledge is natural to human beings. It is that curiosity that
pushes the human being to acquire knowledge in their field of his/her interest. However, the level of
curiosity and curiosity in which field of knowledge varies from person to person. Music, arts, dance,
sports, science, politics, etc. are all fields of knowledge. Depending on your curiosity in that field, you
choose to acquire more knowledge in that field. In any field that you choose, to be the best among that
field, you need to be a ‘researcher’. The best musician invents new sounds and produces new music, the
best sportsman presents new skills, the best scientist invents new machines or discovers new theories,
and best politician finds new ways to fool people and so on. To be the best in any field, you need to
research on the new ideas, implement them and put it on display.
In this chapter, we shall be taking exclusive of scientific research. However, you can take these ideas and
apply it elsewhere. Most of them are valid for non-scientific fields too.
2|Page
How to become a Researcher?
2 Qualities of a Researcher
In previous section, we briefly discussed about the life of researchers and how research applies to all
fields. In this section, we will further probe the lives of researchers and talk about the qualities they
own. Almost all researchers possess some distinct qualities compared to ordinary people. It is these
qualities that help them do research even in the most hostile conditions. The qualities of researchers
include guts to think and question, guts to challenge existing ideas, guts to propose new ideas, guts to
accept new ideas and courage to overcome defeat. Though there isn’t any rule that one must possess
these qualities to be a researcher but given the fact that almost all researchers have these qualities,
these qualities can be used to judge whether a person (ex: student) can be a researcher or not. Also, if
you aspire to be a researcher, make sure that you have these qualities.
Researchers not just exhibit these qualities while doing research but also in their day-to-day life. We
shall now discuss briefly about each of these qualities and why such qualities are essential to doing path-
breaking research.
Especially, in Indian context, ‘the ability to think and question’ is suppressed from the childhood
itself. Children are repeatedly told not to question the elders and follow as they say. In schools
they are told to follow teachers and accept whatever that is written in their books. At religious
places, they are forced not to question what has been written in the scriptures and asked to
perform rituals without understanding them. By the time such child grows up, he/she has lost the
ability to think and question. This social problem is deeply affecting the scientific output of India.
If an event or phenomenon is happening and the cause is unknown, there are two options before
us. The first option is to continue living under the impression that, you can’t do anything about
that event or phenomenon. The second option is to think why that event or phenomenon is
happening and what it means to us. People who choose the second option in their day-to-day
activities have high chances of producing outstanding ideas.
3|Page
How to become a Researcher?
Science needs to be improved and refined every day. The science of today is more advanced and
better than science of yesterday. Similarly, if the science of future has to be better than that of
todays, it needs to be improved. Improvement cannot happen if one doesn’t challenge existing
ideas. Sometimes the existing ideas might be wrong and such ideas needs to be replaced. An idea
cannot be proved wrong until it’s challenged. Merely opposing an existing idea isn’t challenging
the idea. Keep the following guidelines in mind when you challenge existing ideas:
• The challenge has to happen in the mind of the researcher not necessarily in public. That
is, when you understand something and say you disagree, don’t instantly express your
disagreement in public. Think of a solution to the problem and then challenge.
• Getting into unnecessary debates with your friends or teachers on existing ideas will
only waste your time. Unless you are very lucky, you won’t find supporters. If you have
an idea, publish it. If it is scientifically correct, your friends and teachers have no other
option but to accept it.
• Remember that, until you have something more worthy than the existing idea, people
will not pay attention to your challenge. Anyone Tom, Dick and Harry can challenge.
What really happens is, do you have a solution to the problem. Challenge only if you
have a better solution.
• When you propose new ideas, make sure that you highlight the limitations and
assumptions of your idea. Don’t exaggerate.
• Don’t use unnecessary verbs to describe your work. Talk in terms of science, more
specifically in terms of mathematics.
• Make sure you do necessary homework before going public with your ideas. Prepare
yourself for criticism.
• Don’t object to criticism. Criticizers are more important than your friends who agree
with your ideas.
4|Page
How to become a Researcher?
• Be scientific but not over confident. Don’t disrespect other researchers and scientists.
Let your research speak for you.
• Be honest about your ideas. You can fool the people but it isn’t people the one who
decide whether your idea is valid or not. If people had the power, politicians would have
been scientists too!
• Be constructive while reviewing the ideas proposed by other researchers. Don’t over
criticize.
• Don’t reject any idea without understanding it. Why should people make an attempt to
understand your ideas when you reject the ideas of others without understanding
them?
• Keep yourself updated with the current research. Appreciate new discoveries. Drop a
letter of appreciation to the author whenever you come across a good research paper.
• Promote new ideas wherever you can, even if those ideas were discovered by the
person whom you hate the most.
• Don’t be biased towards ideas. Being biased towards a particular idea without any
scientific justification reveals the weakness in your character.
• Don’t accept new ideas just because everyone is accepting them. Analyze, understand
and then decide.
• If your idea gets proved wrong or is replaced by a better idea, accept the new idea
without being egoistic or sad. Being egoistic or feeling sad about it is not going to help.
Trying improving the new idea.
• If you fail to produce results even after repeated experiments, don’t get disheartened.
Edison did over 2000 experiments over the span of several decades before he was able
5|Page
How to become a Researcher?
to successfully invent light bulb. Let each failure serve as fuel for producing profound
results.
• Analyze your failure and don’t repeat mistakes. If you want to improve science then you
need to improve every day.
• The greatness of the hero lies not in his skills but the villains he defeated. As a
researcher, you would face many villains. Those villains will not accept your ideas;
instead, they would try to suppress you and your ideas. Keep faith in your ideas. If your
ideas are indeed true, they will emerge as a winner.
• Failure forces us to make compromises. Avoid making compromises in life as much as
possible.
• When you face failure, people will start showing their true colors. Don’t feel concerned
that you are losing people. All lesser mortals die and their identity will disappear from
this world. Remind yourself that you aren’t one among them and move on in life.
• ‘Lack of funding’ is an excuse given by untalented or misguided people who claim to be
researchers. True researchers always figure out a way to overcome lack of funding
instead of using as an excuse for not producing outstanding research. Majority of great
experiments were performed by researchers who had no funding. Instead they invented
new devices to conduct their experiments. Also, once a researcher produces
outstanding theoretical results, he/she is bound to get invited to participate in the
renowned experiments.
3.1 Read
First and foremost thing as a researcher you must do is ‘read’ as much as possible. Reading helps
you gain knowledge and get a command over subject. Identify the textbooks in the area of your
interest and start reading them. For any particular topic, if you find explanation is missing, try
finding info about that topic on World Wide Web. Common misconception among students is that
WWW has everything and text books are redundant. Even though a lot of information is available
on WWW, in most cases it is not available at one single website. This is where the standard
textbooks scores over WWW. Once, you have gone through at least two standard books in your
area of interest, start reading the journals in that subject. Initially, understanding research papers
can be very difficult as they are written very formally.
6|Page
How to become a Researcher?
• Start from the basics. Unless you are strong in the foundations of the subject, you won’t
be able to challenge existing ideas or produce new ideas.
• Don’t hesitate to refer even to your school textbooks to get an understanding of the
subject. Getting a strong hold on school mathematics is critical to do research in any
branch of science. Refer to Khan Academy Online for excellent lectures on elementary
topics.
• If you get distracted by another subject, do not hesitate to read further about it.
Scientific distractions are good. You are getting distracted by something, because
unknowingly you are finding it interesting. Make advantage of that.
• Do not set time goals on reading. Setting goals such as “will finish reading a particular
book in ‘n’ days” will not help your research. Assume that, you have all the time in the
world to read the book.
• Maintain running notes while reading. Note down important points and questions that
comes across your mind.
• If you come across any formula, spend time deriving that formula. The real pleasure of
understanding the formula comes when you know how to derive it.
3.2 Understand
Reading a subject without understanding is of no use. A rule of thumb: if you are reading a
subject and you aren’t being tempted to understand it then you aren’t interested in that subject.
If that’s happening with you, then choose another subject. There is no point in reading a subject
when you aren’t interested in it. Also, to do research, you need to have a high level of
understanding in that subject. There is a difference between ‘just understanding’ and ‘high level
of understanding’. Keep these points in mind for better understanding
• Every time you read an existing idea, try understanding in what conditions that idea is
valid and what assumptions the author is making.
• Make an attempt to understand why that idea is important to the subject.
• Carefully note down the advantages and limitations of the idea. While doing so, you
might find something that would actually improve the idea.
• Never disrespect or ignore an existing idea. When you disrespect or ignore an idea, you
are losing valuable information. If an idea is wrong, then try replacing it with a better
idea. Sometimes, for lack of better ideas, we adopt ideas which are only approximate.
This doesn’t mean there aren’t better ideas, it just that, as of now it is the best we have.
• Spend time understanding equations and you would start loving them.
7|Page
How to become a Researcher?
3.3 Question
Once you have read and understood a particular subject, you will land on any of the two paths,
both taking you to different destinations. If you land on the first path, you would be completely
satisfied with what you have read and understood and you would have no questions. You would
be convinced whatever you have read is completely true. Or at least, you find no discrepancy in
what you have read. Generally, people who take up teaching profession have landed on the first
path. The second path is rather crazy. Even after reading and understanding, you won’t be
satisfied. You would have hundreds of questions in mind and you find that subject is incomplete.
Generally, researchers land on the second path. If such researcher takes up ‘teaching profession’,
instead of teaching the students about what’s in the subject, such researcher would tend to focus
on what’s incomplete in the subject. That’s why often great researchers don’t make good
teachers. Richard Feynman is an exception!
After reading and understanding a particular subject, if you still have lot of unanswered questions,
then it’s the time for you to start doing research. Generally, a good idea here would be meeting
an expert in the field who can answer some of your questions. However, finding an expert who
can help is very difficult, at least in Indian context. In such cases, participate in discussions on
online forums. Post your questions and have a constructive debate. Also, keep in mind that, on
online forums, even the non-knowledgeable people pose as knowledgeable. Don’t accept any
answer blindly.
• Before posing a question to a professor or in an online forum, give them the context on
why such question is important to the subject.
• If you believe your question is advanced then drop an email to professors of various
universities. Explain in detail on why you think such question is important. Some
professors do reply. (My personal experience with Indian professors has been very bad. I
wonder if majority of Indian Professors even check their emails!)
• Always pose the question politely. The answers that you get often depend on how you
pose the question. Note that, science is not owned by anyone. If someone is defending
an idea which you think is wrong, then you don’t have to argue with that person.
• Science is not democracy. The opinion of majority doesn’t matter in Science. In science,
only the truth matters. So, even if majority of the people disagree with you, don’t get
disheartened. When nobody has answers, it’s an indication that, you have to find the
answer through your research.
3.4 Solve
You read the subject, understood it and still you have lot of questions. What does it mean? It
means that, a lot of ideas in that subject can be either improved or replaced. It’s the time for you
start thinking and producing answers to your questions. This is the most exciting phase of time for
8|Page
How to become a Researcher?
the researcher. This is the phase when the researcher is giving birth to new ideas. This is the
phase when the researcher is adding his name to field of science.
If there exists a question and its answer hasn’t been found yet, such question is referred as
‘problem’ in academic circles. To successfully complete a PhD, one must solve a ‘problem’ of
important nature. A famous quote is that, ‘a researcher doesn’t choose a problem to solve, the
problem choses the researcher’. The meaning of the quotation is not that, a researcher will be
assigned to solve a problem but rather it means, unknowing the researcher will be led to solving
such problem. To produce outstanding research, you have to choose a problem that you find
interesting. Unless you find pleasure in working on that problem, you won’t be able to dedicate
your uninterrupted attention towards it.
• As a researcher, you should find abundant open problems in this universe. Pick the
problem that gives you immense pleasure in solving.
o Note for PhD students: Don’t choose the problem because your guide wants
it to solve. Choose the problem that you would find pleasure in solving.
• Believe in yourself that you are going to solve the problem no matter what. People
would try to bring down your confidence, don’t give up.
• For every solution you arrive, note down carefully all conditions and assumptions you
are making.
• Frequently discuss about the problem with someone who has no knowledge about the
problem. Explain the problem to such person and tell them why it’s important. Often
such discussion leads to a solution.
• Take criticism constructively. Whenever someone critics your approach or solution,
take some time out to think, why you are being criticized. All great researchers face
criticism, so don’t be disappointed or frustrated at criticizer’s remarks.
• Don’t reduce the scope of the problem by making unnecessary assumptions.
• Don’t pressurize yourself by setting time-limits for solving the problem.
• Sometimes, solving the problem can be frustrating. You might find it far more complex
than you actually expected it to be. Naturally, you would get angry because of it, which
might affect your personal life. If you are in a relationship, it might affect it too. If your
partner doesn’t understand your situation, then you might have to choose between
your partner and the problem. (Remember that, you can get a partner after you solve
the problem, but once you lose the problem, you can’t get it!)
• Remember that, solution requires just one idea and such idea can arrive at any time.
Make sure that, you note down every idea you get. Many times, new ideas arrive at
odd times and we tend to forget them. It’s really difficult to recollect them again.
• When you are trying to solve a problem, it is always a good idea to start writing a
‘book’ in that subject. If you end-up solving the problem, the book will serve as a
reference in that field.
9|Page
How to become a Researcher?
3.5 Publish
The most difficult phase in the life of the researcher is ‘publish’ phase. After a researcher solves a
problem, he/she has to publish the solution in a standard journal or a conference. Keep the
following guidelines in mind while publishing papers:
• After you complete your paper, think about which journal suits your paper. Top journals
accept only those papers which present solutions to important problems. Don’t be over
ambitious. Know the type of problem you have solved. Depending on the value of the
problem you have solved, select an appropriate journal.
• Make sure that you are submitting the paper to a journal of considerable repute. Read
the papers published by that journal before submitting your paper to it.
• Now-a-days, a lot of journals are advertising themselves using a term called impact-
factor. Don’t let such advertisements make you fooled. Impact-factor can be inflated
and is not a testimonial for the quality of the journal.
• Most of the journals have Editorial committees for namesake. Don’t make a decision of
submitting your paper to that journal just because it has so and so member in its
editorial committee.
• Rate the journal based on its readership than based on impact-factor. Publishing your
paper in a journal of high impact factor doesn’t guarantee citations for your paper. Your
paper gets citations only when it makes significant contribution to that subject. A good
paper published in a journal that has sufficient readership is bound to attract large
audience.
• If your paper gets rejected, it doesn’t necessarily mean your solution is wrong. It could
be because you haven’t been able to express yourself properly. Polish your words and
try to be as clear as possible. Take feedback about your writing style from a non-
technical person. Simplicity of writing is a hallmark of all great researchers.
10 | P a g e
How to become a Researcher?
• Approach only those professors who are actively pursuing research in the field of your
interest. Someone who has done PhD several years ago and hasn’t kept himself/herself
updated with current research won’t be able to guide you on research. Approaching
such professors will be waste of your time.
• Generally, the ‘research-oriented’ professors are the ones who regularly visit journals
section of your university library.
• Good teachers might not be good researchers. Therefore, don’t approach a professor
just because he/she is teaching a particular subject very well. That professor might just
be doing a ‘teaching job’ but not research. Generally, good teachers tend to defend the
stuff written in books rather than critically pointing the problematic areas where further
research is needed.
• Search the name of the concerned professor on internet. If he/she has published quality
research papers, then you should be able to find several links pointing to the papers.
Read about the research done by your professor. You would be able to get some idea on
the knowledge of the professor.
• Read at least two papers written by the professor before approaching. If you aren’t able
download/obtain the papers written by him/her, then approach the professor for those
papers. Note that, if the papers are readily available for download and yet you have
approached the professor for a copy of those papers, he/she would consider you dumb
and incapable to do research. In this modern era, a student who can’t search and find
content on internet, can’t do research. If a student can’t find the content that’s already
available, how can you expect such student to discover new content?
• While reading the papers written by the professor, make sure you take down some
notes. When you approach the professor, those notes would be highly useful during the
conversation with the professor.
• Before you approach the professor for a conversation, take an appointment. Before you
start the conversation, ask the professor whether he is busy with some other work.
• When you approach the professor for guidance, don’t directly start the conversation by
stating what you need. Good professors will guide you only when they find the
intellectual spark in the conversation. Discuss the latest paper you have read and the
related research ideas you have. Agreeing to every idea proposed by the professor is not
the trait of a researcher. Ask questions and don’t be afraid to debate on an idea. Good
professors love intellectual debates.
• During the first conversation itself, if the professor tilts the discussion towards research
funding or bureaucratic work, then he/she isn’t capable of guiding you for research. A
good professor always discusses ideas during first conversation.
11 | P a g e
How to become a Researcher?
12 | P a g e
How to become a Researcher?
Every year above 5, 00,000 engineers are passing out from the 1500 technical colleges as per the
details from the formal technical education board of India.
Populace has started misinterpreting that engineering and technical courses have just turned into a
simple graduation degree leading to fall in quality education. Getting into an engineering college has
become so simple that it is now difficult by a fresher to crack corporate entry with good job profile and
salary.
Top policy makers are worried that post graduate studies in engineering are abysmally low and only
about 5% of the engineering graduates continue to complete M-Tech and, of these only 3% go on to do
a doctorate. This not only causes a severe shortage of qualified faculty, it also blunts the edge in
research and innovation.
Here comes the need of academic research and investigation in various areas of science and
engineering that can add value to the technical education. Creating research interests among the
young talents can ignite great innovations. This chapter inculcates such interests among students which
will guide them with basic information and awareness on paper presentation.
The four major queries that students generally ask about paper presentation are:
• What is a Paper?
• How to write Research Papers?
• Where to submit Papers?
• Benefits of Paper Presentation / Publication
13 | P a g e
How to become a Researcher?
14 | P a g e
How to become a Researcher?
15 | P a g e
How to become a Researcher?
2.2b.1 Title
This is an opening and important part of a paper because this would bring the readers to be interested
in your article. The authors should always try choosing a catchy title and use good punctuation and
grammar. Therefore this should be as attractive as possible. However it should truly reflect your
scientific work; in other words what you have achieved by doing this work. Avoid giving general titles.
For example, “The effects of serotonin in placental vascular reactivity” is a better heading than
“placental vascular reactivity” because the former one is specific to the work carried out and the data
obtained.
16 | P a g e
How to become a Researcher?
Sometimes scientists start working with the belief that they would obtain positive results (or a positive
co-relation); however the data and the statistical analysis may have given a negative interpretation. In
this case there is no harm in giving a negative heading (e.g. “Substance P does not produce vascular
relaxation in placental vessels”). This is perfectly acceptable as it truly reflects the data obtained.
2.2b.3 Abstract
An abstract is a brief summary of a research article that summarises the major aspects of the entire
paper. It usually has the limit of 250 to 500 words. Therefore it should be brief with the following
prescribed sequence;
• The research question(s) and the purpose (from Introduction) - State the purpose very clearly
in the first or second sentence.
• Information about the experimental design and methods used, (from Methods) - Clearly
express the basic design of the study (without giving excessive details).
• The major findings including key quantitative results, or trends (from Results) - Report the data
that give answers to the research questions
• A brief summary of the interpretations and conclusions. (from Discussion) - Clearly state the
implications of the data should be clearly stated.
17 | P a g e
How to become a Researcher?
Abstracts are widely and readily available to the scientific community via internet, and therefore it
should be concise and make an impact on to the readers. Avoid lengthy background information or
references to other literature, abbreviations or terms that may be confusing to readers, and any sort of
illustration, figure, or table.
2.2b.4 Introduction
The function of the introduction is to establish the context of the work being reported. It should discuss
the relevant primary research literature (with citations) and a summary of current understanding of the
problem which is being investigated. It should describe what has been carried out in this field and
highlight the importance of current investigation. State the purpose of the work in the form of the
hypothesis, question, or problem you have investigated. Briefly explain the rationale, the approach and
the possible outcome that this study can reveal.
Relevant information from original research articles should be used to “build-up” the introduction.
Most importantly give credit to the original authors by citing them (and giving details of the whole
article in the reference section).
2.2b.5 Methodology
This is the easiest section to write in a paper. Methods have been carried out by the authors in their
investigation and therefore they should remember it. However make it a pint to describe the protocol
in sufficient detail that other scientists could repeat this work to verify the findings. This section should
also include details of hypotheses tested, controls, treatments, variables measured, how many
replicates, what was measured, what form the data, and how the data was analysed (statistical
analysis). Always identify treatments by the variable or treatment name, NOT by an ambiguous, generic
name or number. If the paper includes more than one experiment, use subheadings to help the
presentation.
18 | P a g e
How to become a Researcher?
2.2b.6 Results
This section should contain the key (but not all) results without any form of interpretation. It should be
presented in a logical sequence using illustrative materials (Tables and Figures) to support the text.
Summaries of the statistical analyses may appear either in the text (usually parenthetically) or in the
relevant tables or figures (in the legend or as footnotes to the table or figures). The text of the results
section follows the sequence of tables, graphs and figures to highlight the answers to the questions
investigated. Important negative results should be reported, too.
Write the text of the Results section concisely and objectively in passive voice. Always use the past
tense, as the results have already been obtained. Avoid repetitive paragraph structures. Do not
interpret the data here.
2.2b.7 Discussion
This is the major and the most difficult section to write. This is the place where the results should be
interpreted and critically analyzed in relation to published data. Try to explain how the results have
improved the understandings of the subject or problem. The discussion should always connect to the
introduction by way of the question(s) or hypotheses in the literature cited. Note this is not a simple
repeat or rearrangement of the Introduction. Instead, it tells how this study has moved the scientific
community forward.
• Do these results provide answers to the testable hypotheses? If so, how it can be interpreted?
• Do these findings agree with what others have shown? If not, is there any alternative
explanation for this finding; or are there any un-foreseen design flaws in the current
experiment?
• What would be the next step in this study (e.g., what experiments can be carried out next? This
is important as it tells the reader that the authors intend to continue this investigation in
future.
2.2b.7 Conclusion
Finally try to explain what conclusions can be drawn from this study. Always remember most of the
investigations do not give any clear conclusions (if so, then there is no future for this investigation!).
Therefore avoid sentences like “from these results it can be concluded” instead use “the data from this
study suggest”. Now days it is extremely difficult to conclusively and flawlessly prove anything in
science.
2.2b.8 Acknowledgements
If, in your experiment, you received any significant help in designing, or carrying out the work, or
received materials from someone who did you a favour by supplying them, you must acknowledge
their assistance and the service or material provided.
19 | P a g e
How to become a Researcher?
Please note that reference list is different from “Bibliography”, as the later contains references that are
used to get the background knowledge (but not specific to the paper). Bibliography sections are found
in books and other literary writing, but not scientific journal-style papers.
The following are some of the most excellent places where you can exhibit your research work based
on the level of the paper:
Technical symposiums are generally referred to as paper presentation contests where students
compete with their co-participants for a best paper. The presentation skills of the author along with the
technical content are considered as weightage and are awarded accordingly.
20 | P a g e
How to become a Researcher?
2.3.2 Conferences
In most cases a conference is considered as a meeting for exchange of information with a formal
agenda. An academic conference is such a program for researchers to present and discuss their work.
Conferences provide an important channel for exchange of information between researchers with the
participation of professionals from research centres, government organizations, corporate agencies,
and people from industrial sector apart from academicians and students.
2.3.3 Publications
If an author desires to make his/her content available to the public, the research work may have to be
submitted to organizations involved in publications. However the author of a work remains the initial
owner who in turn can transfer its ownership to others.
In academic publishing the research work is generally submitted in the form a manuscript for possible
publication in a scientific journal or a technical magazine.
2.3.4 Patents
Apart from academic research the authors should also be aware of how to commercialize his/her
research. Since every innovation involves years of research, huge resources, energy, and time of a
researcher it is important to focus on the outcome of the work.
A patent is an exclusive right given by law to inventors to make use of, and exploit, their inventions for
a limited period of time. By granting the inventor a temporary monopoly in exchange for a full
description of how to perform the invention, patents play a key role in developing industry around the
world.
A researcher should always continue to produce when ever he/she gets a chance to work on. However
if there are no possibilities to make research a profession, it can still be continued as a hobby.
21 | P a g e
How to become a Researcher?
The following are some of the benefits that a researcher can avail:
2.5 Plagiarism
Plagiarism has long been a problem in education which is further aggravated by the advent of the
internet and the worldwide. Therefore, Higher Education institutions in the developed countries are
following certain rules in academic writing. A working knowledge of these rules is critically important for
undergraduates (and postgraduates) to avoid plagiarism. The concept of ‘undergraduate plagiarism’ is
well focused and researched. However, the information on plagiarism at school level is limited. One
recent study on avoiding plagiarism at secondary school level has concluded that ‘attempts should be
made to engage the students to evade plagiarism’ (McGregor and Williamson, 2005).
Therefore, when an undergraduate enters the university he/she may be unaware of good academic
practice and methods needed to avoid plagiarism. The universities in developing countries may not be
so insistent on documenting sources or the concept of ‘plagiarism’. These institutions, as Yamada (2003)
puts, may also take into consideration of (a) students’ inability to understand the new concepts which
are mainly written in English - a language other than their mother tongue and (b) their cultural beliefs.
Most of the universities are incorporating lectures, seminars and student workshops to enhance the
ability of all students (both home and especially international) to understand plagiarism and most
importantly how to avoid it. This is carried out via implementation of institutions’ policies without
evidence that these formative lectures/seminars are actually improving the students’ academic writing
skills.
22 | P a g e
How to become a Researcher?
Since learning and writing in a second language is a continuous process, it is not clear whether these
‘one day’ seminars can help the students to improve their academic writing skills. This study aims to
investigate whether formative lectures alone would (a) enhance the students’ understanding of
plagiarism and (b) improve their academic writing and avoidance of plagiarism.
References:
[1] Notes on "Gathering information for essays which require research" from State University of
New York Empire State College http://www.esc.edu
[2] Robert A. Day and Barbara Gastel - How to write and publish a scientific paper? Sixth Edition,
Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org/9780521671675
[3] Stephen Bailey - Academic Writing: A Handbook for International Students (Routledge Study
Guides) [Paperback].
[4] John Swales , Christine B. Feak - Academic Writing for Graduate Students: Essential Tasks and
Skills (Michigan Series in English for Academic & Professional Purposes) [Paperback].
[5] James Hartley - Academic Writing and Publishing: A Practical Handbook [Paperback]
[6] Beasley, JD (2004) The impact of technology on plagiarism prevention and detection: research
process automation – a new approach for prevention Proceedings on Plagiarism: prevention,
Practice & Policy (eds) Smith AP and Duggan F (Plagiarism Advisory Service) 23-30.
[7] Brogan KM and Brogan JD (1983) Yet another ethical problem in technical writing.
[8] ERIC, Reviewed in Pecorari (2003)
[9] Currie, P (1998) Staying out of trouble: Apparent plagiarism and academic survival. Journal of
Second Language Writing, 7(1) 1-18.
[10]Deckert, GD (1993) Perspectives on plagiarism from ESL students in Hong Kong Journal of
Second Language Writing, 2(2), 131-148
[11]Howard, RM (1995) Plagiarism, authorships, and the academic death penalty College English 57,
788-806
[12]Sivasubramaniam, SD (2004) Plagiarism amongst biomedical science undergraduates concerned
academics versus ignorant students. Proceedings on Plagiarism: prevention, Practice & Policy
(eds) Smith AP and Duggan F (Plagiarism Advisory Service) 205-224.
23 | P a g e
How to become a Researcher?
24 | P a g e
How to become a Researcher?
Participation in technical programs and presenting research papers is very essential for students,
researchers, scientists, academicians and professors. This chapter gives an insight on the importance of
such technical programs with clarity on each type of program and its significance. Technical
symposiums, conferences, workshops, seminars and guest lectures are some of the most common
technical programs. The main reason to have a separate chapter on importance of technical programs
and publications is to give lucidity in identifying a particular program and distinguishing it with other
programs. There are situations where the event is organized as a workshop but it turns out to be a
symposium or a seminar. This chapter shall help the organizers in correctly taking up the technical
program and conduct the event accordingly.
3.1 Symposiums
25 | P a g e
How to become a Researcher?
The invitation for the participants may be in the form of brochures, pamphlets, posters, emails etc. Ex:
International Engineering Symposium 2011(IES 2011) organized by Kumamoto University, JAPAN on 3rd
- 5th March, 2011 It intends to provide a common platform for bringing together researchers from
universities and research organizations in India and Japan for expanding academic collaboration. This
event focuses on the current research and development activities in both countries on topics of current
interest, with special emphasis on “Engineering & Technology”. It is expected that the emerging
technologies and scientific advancements in these themes will be disseminated during the Symposium.
Presentations will also feature new and innovative technologies in the relevant fields.34th International
Symposium on Remote Sensing of Environment on April 10-15, 2011 at Sydney, Australia.
3.2 Conferences
An academic conference is a large gathering of students, researchers, scientists, academicians and
professors along with participation from industry and corporate companies to share their ideas and
research work. The conferences are generally organized by academic institutions, colleges, universities,
Government bodies or non-profit scientific societies and professional bodies. Conferences provide an
important channel for exchange of information between researchers together with academic or
scientific journals. Conferences are mainly of three categories:
Ex:
a) International Conference on Advances in Civil Engineering organizing by Department of Civil
Engineering, KL University, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, INDIA.
Ex: International Conference on Emerging Trends in Engineering (ICETE) organized by Dr. J J Magdum
College of Engineering, Jaysinghpur, Maharastra with technical support of CAFET- INNOVA Technical
Society (CITS) on 20th February, 2010.
26 | P a g e
How to become a Researcher?
Apart from the above three categories, conferences can also be classified as National conference if it is
organized by one nation; Conferences between two countries like Indo-Japanese Conference, etc.;
Continental conferences like Asian Conference, European Conference, etc.; and International
conferences with participation from different countries.
After review of full length papers few are accepted with minor or major corrections and intimated to the
corresponding author. The authors then need to present this paper before the session chair during the
conference after registration.
27 | P a g e
How to become a Researcher?
3.2.7 Sponsors
The identity of the sponsors is an indicator of the quality of the conference. The conferences organized
by commercial companies go for profit-making and the papers presented at such conferences are
generally of lower quality. In most cases, conferences sponsored by professional bodies, non-profit
societies, universities or groups of academics are worth participating.
3.2.8 Location
Location of the conference is an important factor for the success of the event. Major conferences held in
capital cities are often easier to attend in terms of transport and accommodation. Huge participation
can be expected for such conferences, unlike the one organized in remote places.
3.2.9 Theme
If the conference covers a broad area, it is likely that the audience will be bigger, with added benefits in
terms of exposure and networking. At the same time, it may be hard to find participants with a serious
interest in particular area of research. A smaller conference tends to be more tightly focused and is
possible that you will find yourself in closer contact with the experts in your field. You will need to strike
a balance in such cases.
28 | P a g e
How to become a Researcher?
3.2.10 Benefits:
Attending conferences is a critical part of scientific networking in these days. However, you will gain the
most benefit if you present a paper as the conference papers are a means by which you can attract the
attention of potential experts and influence academic debate in your field.
Some other benefits of presenting a conference paper include:
Ex: National workshop on “Paper Presentation Awareness & Research Methodology” organized by
CAFET-INNOVA Technical Society at Hyderabad definitely creates an excellent research interests among
engineering and science students. For all the academicians this is right platform for get an excellent
knowledge about paper presentations, preparation and publication of research papers and research
methodologies.
29 | P a g e
How to become a Researcher?
The educational institutions generally organize national workshops for their students and faculty
developments. Sometimes well institutions collaborate with foreign universities and organize
international workshops on advanced research areas. These brings good exposure for those
organizations and participants also get enormous knowledge from those training programs and
participants should have an excellent opportunity to learn highly advanced technologies in their
research areas.
3.4 Seminars
Seminar is generally a large lecture by an expert in the particular area or subject. It is generally
organized by academic institution or professional or commercial organization. These seminars start
vfrom class room and ends at international. Seminars are generally technical and general seminars.
Technical seminars are mainly covers advanced trends and applications of technical topics such as
Technical Seminar on “Computer Aided Design” or “Geographical Information System” or “Embedded
Systems” etc.
A seminar is more like a workshop, where the presenter offers some information in a participatory
learning setting, and the participants discuss among each other and/or ask questions of the presenter.
Then they move on to the next topic.
Seminar and Presentation are two different things. Seminar is based on a theme whereas presentation is
based on a subject. There can be many presentations in a seminar. A seminar can be whole day affair
whereas a presentation is short. In short, a presentation can be a subset of a seminar whereas the
reverse is not true. I would expect a seminar to be more educational than a presentation. In t seminar
everyone has an equal right to be heard and an equal responsibility for keeping the seminar working
properly. The most difficult and important skill in effective seminar participation is good listening. You
need to attend carefully to what others are saying. And then you need to learn to respond intelligently
and helpfully.
A seminar is not just a collection of individual points of view declared one after the other. It has a
rhythm, often an unpredictable rhythm, which is established, above all, by the ways in which the
participants respond to each other. If someone’s contribution is puzzling, then ask him to continue,
taking care of a particular trouble you have with a point he raised. If the contribution is very good, tell
the speaker so. If you disagree or have an alternative point, then put that on the table. As in a
conversation, in a seminar the participant has to be prepared to be flexible, adjusting her participation
to what is happening moment by moment throughout the seminar. This is the major challenge of the
process.
30 | P a g e
How to become a Researcher?
Guest lecture is usually a lecture given by an expert in particular discipline or well experienced in
research and came from outside of the organization. These are generally organized by academic
institutions for create awareness and motivating the students and faculty on advanced disciplines or
technologies or research methods and applications. Sometimes corporate companies also conduct guest
lecturers to train their staff members in advances technologies. The person who gives guest lecture is
generally called as guest speaker.
3.6. Journals
After preparation of the research paper the author has to search for right journal in the society then as
per their requirements (it means size and font style of the title, text, main headings, sub headings,
figures, tables, etc) paper has to be modified and then submit the paper through electronic submission
or post the hard copy of the paper.
Each journal has its own Editor-in-Chief, Executive Editors, Sub Editor and an editorial board. Generally
Editor-in-Chief is also called as Managing Editor, who is full time employed and manages all
communications between the author and r reviewers. The Executive and sub editors are support the
managing editor in all aspects.
31 | P a g e
How to become a Researcher?
An editorial board includes a number of referees (also known as reviewers) who are responsible for
reviewing and evaluating the submitted papers. Having reviewed a paper, each referee independently
advises the editor whether to accept or to reject the paper. This is usually done using a peer review form
provided by the editor. However, final decisions are made by the editor. It is common practice that
editors assign external referees to review submissions, for example when the referees of the editorial
board do not have appropriate expertise to make constructive comments on a particular paper.
The most important function of an editor (can also be a group of persons) is to make the final decision
whether to accept or to reject a submitted paper. Indeed, the comments of the referees just serve as
suggestions. Nevertheless, as the editor alone would not be able to review and comment on all
submissions in detail, he usually relies on the advice of his editorial board, where he can choose from a
pool of experts in diverse fields of the journal’s main topics. If there is consensus on acceptance or
rejection, the editor’s life is fairly easy. It becomes difficult only when there is significant disagreement
in the reviewer’s suggestions. In such a case the editor may make a final decision based on the own
opinion or after consulting additional referees.
Completion of Research
Preparation of Manuscript
Submission of Manuscript
Review of Manuscript
Decision
Rejection Revision
Resubmission
Journals are generally divided in to two types; one is national journals and another is International
journals. National Journal are belongs to one nation or country, these publish articles or research papers
with in the country. International Journals are worldwide journal they can publish research papers from
all over the world.
32 | P a g e
How to become a Researcher?
3.7. Magazines
33 | P a g e
How to become a Researcher?
3.8. Newsletters
References
[1]. Yuksel, A.: Writing publishable papers. Tourism Management (In Press)
[2]. National Institute for Regional and Spatial Analysis: Questions editors are often asked.
http://www.may.ie/nirsa/geo-pub/geo-editors.html (2003)
[3]. Davis, M.: Scientific Papers and Presentations. Academic Press, San Diego (1997)
[4]. Day, R.A.: How to Write and Publish a Scientific Paper. Second edn. ISI Press, Philadelphia (1983)
[5]. Dees, R.: Writing the Modern Research Paper. Second edn. Allyn & Bacon, Boston (1997)
[6]. American Psychological Association: Apa style. http://www.apastyle.org/ pubmanual.html
(2003)
34 | P a g e
How to become a Researcher?
Publishing research work is very essential for researchers in their academic pursuit. It is
therefore important to know the editorial policies of a particular journal before he submits his
research work. After the submission of manuscript the researcher should also be aware of
review process so that there will be transparency in the evaluat
evaluation.
The author should receive the feedback positively from the referee and develop the manuscript
based on the suggestions to meet the journal standards. This chapter gives the methodology
followed in general, by most of the publishers to evaluate the m
manuscripts.
anuscripts. The researchers will
get a better idea to submit quality papers which would easily clear the review process and get
accepted for publication.
Publishing research papers in journals with greater impact factor adds value to researchers for
their research work. But the actual story behind the impact factor calculation is known to very
less people involved in teaching and research. This chapter shall cover all details of citations
and impact
pact factor calculation which will be useful to researchers in choosing the publication for
their research work.
35 | P a g e
How to become a Researcher?
36 | P a g e
How to become a Researcher?
text. The format of references can be obtained in any issue and the names of journals should be spelled
out in full. Papers “in preparation” and “submitted” cannot be used as references. Please make a careful
crosscheck of the reference list against citations in the text. Tables should be compiled on separate
sheets and designed to fit across a single or double column width of the journal page. Use of decimal
points, rather than commas, is required for all reported numbers. Illustrations should be legible and
contain only relevant information. Place names and other locations mentioned in the text must appear
clearly on maps. Clear instructions must be provided on how mathematical symbols and equations
should be printed. For Greek and non-Roman letters, authors must identify the symbol in words the first
time it is used. Receipt of manuscripts will be acknowledged by e-mail or by post if an e-mail address is
not provided.
37 | P a g e
How to become a Researcher?
The copy-right form and reviewers’ evaluation form are shown below:
To,
The Editor-In-Chief,
International Journal of Earth Science and Engineering,
CAFET-INNOVA Technical Society, Hyderabad, India
Sir,
“International Journal of Earth Sciences and Engineering published by CAFET-INNOVA Technical Society,
Hyderabad, India”
1) The Article is my/our original contribution. It does not infringe on the rights of others and does
not contain any libelous or unlawful statements.
2) Wherever required I/We have taken permission and acknowledged the source.
3) The work has been submitted only to “International Journal of Earth Science and Engineering.
CAFET-INNOVA Technical Society, Hyderabad, India”
4) That it has not been previously published or submitted elsewhere for publication.
5) I/We hereby authorize you to edit, alter, modify and make changes in the Article to make it
suitable for publication.
6) I/We hereby assign all the copyrights relating to the said Article to the CAFET-INNOVA Technical
Society, Hyderabad, India.
7) I/We have not assigned any kind of rights of the above said Article to any other
person/Publications.
(Signature)
Name of the Authors:
38 | P a g e
How to become a Researcher?
Item YES NO
Does the manuscript fall within the scope of the (IJEE) journal?
Are you aware of prior publication or presentation of this work?
In your opinion, is the technical treatment free of errors?
Is the paper too lengthy
Is the English grammar and punctuation good?
Any other ( )
39 | P a g e
How to become a Researcher?
I have gone through the above paper which presents the physicochemical characteristics of ore fluids
associated with the Kallur copper deposit. My general remark is that approach of this type to
understand role of fluids involved in the copper mineralization is appreciable. This paper presents the
results of specific interest. Except for the minor modification which is required for the ultimate
publication of the paper, the paper deserves publication in the journal. My other specific comments are
marked in the text, tables, and diagrams and figure itself.
The paper may be accepted for publication once the changes are incorporated.
Date:
Name of the reviewer / Referee:
Email:
NOTE: (name will be deleted-before sending –authors)
The abstracting and indexing are practical arts and have two general purposes i.e. minimizing the time &
effort and maximizing the searching success. The function of an index is to give users systematic and
effective shortcuts to the information they need.
Some of the most important and few abstracting and indexing organizations that cover all disciplines are
Google Scholar and Thomson Reuters ISI Web of knowledge. While the well known discipline specific
indexing service include PubMed/Medline (in the field of medicine), ChemAbstracts (chemistry), ADS
(astronomy & physics), Zentralblatt für Mathematik (mathematics), among many others.
4.4 Citation:
A citation is an enumeration that quotes a reference to a precedent by acknowledging the relevance of
other’s works. It represents the conceptual association of scientific ideas where the authors of a
research paper make explicit linkages between their current research and prior work.
However there is a difference in terminology between “citation” and “reference”. The reference is
generally included in the current paper acknowledging the previous work. Also that particular previous
work now will have a citation in the current paper, which will be recorded.
Similarly there is a variation in the words “cited” and “citing”. The cited work is a paper that has been
mentioned in the references of other works, while the citing work is the one that contains the
references.
40 | P a g e
How to become a Researcher?
The basic citation data gives the number of articles published during that year and the number of times
the articles in the journal were cited during the year by later articles in itself and other journals.
• The number of times the articles in the journal were cited during the year by later articles in
itself and other journals.
• The number of citations made from articles published in the journal that year to it and other
specific individual journals during each of the most recent ten years.
• The number of times articles published in the journal during each of the most recent ten years
were cited by individual specific journals during the year
If A represents total number of cites in a current year, B represents the number of cites to articles
published in previous two years, and C represents the number of articles published in previous two
years, then the Impact Factor is given by the ratio of B to C.
41 | P a g e
How to become a Researcher?
Example:
However the impact factor for the year 2007 will be published in 2008
Important Note: New journals, which are indexed from their first published issue, will receive an impact
factor after two years of indexing; in this case, the citations to the year prior to Volume 1, and the
number of articles published in the year prior to Volume 1 are known zero values. Journals that are
indexed starting with a volume other than the first volume will not get an impact factor until they have
been indexed for three years.
42 | P a g e
How to become a Researcher?
• Used to provide a gross approximation of the prestige of journals in which individuals have been
published
• Useful in clarifying the significance of total citation frequencies.
• Eliminates some of the bias of such counts which favor large journals over small ones, or
frequently issued journals over less frequently issued ones, and of older journals over newer
ones.
References:
[1] Price D. J. D. Little science, big science...and beyond. New York: Columbia University Press, 1986.
301 p.
[2] Small H. G. Cited documents as concept symbols. Soc. Stud. Sci. 8:327-40, 1978.
[3] Merton R. K. Foreword. (Garfield E) Citation indexing—its theory and application in science,
technology, and the humanities. Philadelphia: ISI Press®, 1983. p. vi.
[4] Kochen M. How do we acknowledge intellectual debts? J. Doc. 43:54-64, 1987.
[5] Urey H. C. Lifelike forms in meteorites. Science 137:623-8, 1962.
[6] Selye H. General adaptation syndrome. J. Clin. Endocrinol. 6:117-230, 1946.
[7] Gray W. A. & Harley A. J. Computer assisted indexing. Inform. Storage Retrieval 7:167-74, 1971.
[8] Garfield E. & Sher I. H. KeyWords Plus—algorithmic derivative indexing. J. Amer. Soc. Inform. Sci.
44:298-9, 1993.
[9] Martyn J. Unwitting duplication of research. New Sci. 21:338, 1964.Gross P L K, Gross E M.
College libraries and chemical education. Science 66:385-9, 1927.
[10] Brodman E. Methods of choosing physiology journals. Bull. Med. Libr. Assn. 32:479-83, 1944.
[11] Garfield E. Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation. Science 178:471-9, 1972.
[12] Citation indexing for studying science. Nature 227:669-71, 1970.
[13] Which medical journals have the greatest impact? Ann. Intern. Med. 105:313-20, 1986
[14] http://ccp.wkpharma.com/pdfs/CCPolicy.PDF 2010 Wolters Kluwer
43 | P a g e
How to become a Researcher?
Hafeez Basha. R did his B-Tech in Electrical and Electronics Engineering from
Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University, JNTU Hyderabad and M-Tech in
Computer Science Engineering from Acharya Nagarjuna University, Guntur.
Hafeez Basha. R He served as Advisory / Technical member in various expert committees and
even organized International Conferences and Technical Symposiums. He is
also Managing Editor for International Journals published by Cafet-Innova
Technical Society an international non-profit organization helping the
scientific community.
Professor D. Venkat Reddy did his M.Sc (Geology) and M.Sc (Tech)
Hydrogeology from Osmania University, Hyderabad. He obtained his Ph. D in
Geology from the same University and currently working as Professor in
Department of Civil Engineering, National Institute of Technology (NIT),
Karnataka.
44 | P a g e
How to become a Researcher?
If we knew what it was we were doing, it would not be called research, would it??
Introduction
The way in which research is conducted may be conceived of in terms of the research philosophy
subscribed to, the research strategy employed and so the research instruments utilized (and perhaps
developed) in the pursuit of a goal - the research objective(s) - and the quest for the solution of a
problem i.e., the research question. Research is an academic activity and as such the term should be
used in a technical sense. According to Clifford Woody research comprises defining and redefining
problems, formulating
ating hypothesis or suggested solutions; collecting, organizing and evaluating data;
making deductions and reaching conclusions; and at last carefully testing the conclusions to determine
whether they fit the formulating hypothesis. D. Slesinger and M. Ste Stephenson
phenson in the Encyclopedia of
Social Sciences define research as “the manipulation of things, concepts or symbols for the purpose of
generalizing to extend, correct or verify knowledge, whether that knowledge aids in construction of
theory or in the practice
ice of an art.”Research is, thus, an original contribution to the existing stock of
knowledge making for its advancement. It is the pursuit of truth with the help of study, observation,
comparison and experiment. In short, the search for knowledge through objective and systematic
method of finding solution to a problem is research. The systematic approach concerning generalization
and the formulation of a theory is also research. As such the term ‘research’ refers to the systematic
method consisting of enunciating
ciating the problem,, formulating a hypothesis, collecting the facts or data,
analyzing the facts and reaching certain conclusions either in the form of solutions(s) towards the
concerned problem or in certain generalizations for some theoretical formulation.
45 | P a g e
How to become a Researcher?
5.1.1 Positivism
Positivists believe that reality is stable and can be observed and described from an objective viewpoint
(Levin, 1988), i.e. without interfering with the phenomena being studied. They contend that phenomena
should be isolated and that observations should be repeatable. This often involves manipulation of
reality with variations in only a single independent variable so as to identify regularities in, and to form
relationships between, some of the constituent elements of the social world. Predictions can be made
on the basis of the previously observed and explained realities and their inter-relationships. "Positivism
has a long and rich historical tradition. It is so embedded in our society that knowledge claims not
grounded in positivist thought are simply dismissed as ascientific and therefore invalid" (Hirschheim,
1985, p.33). This view is indirectly supported by Alavi and Carlson (1992) who, in a review of 902 IS
research articles, found that all the empirical studies were positivist in approach. Positivism has also had
a particularly successful association with the physical and natural sciences. There has, however, been
much debate on the issue of whether or not this positivist paradigm is entirely suitable for the social
sciences (Hirschheim, 1985), many authors calling for a more pluralistic attitude towards research
methodologies (Kuhn, 1970; Bjørn-Andersen, 1985; Remenyi and Williams, 1996). Indeed, some of the
difficulties experienced in research, such as the apparent inconsistency of results, may be attributed to
the inappropriateness of the positivist paradigm for the domain. Likewise, some variables or constituent
parts of reality might have been previously thought un-measurable under the positivist paradigm and
hence went unresearched (after Galliers, 1991).
5.1.2 Interpretivism
Interpretivists contend that only through the subjective interpretation of and intervention in reality can
that reality be fully understood. The study of phenomena in their natural environment is key to the
interpretivist philosophy, together with the acknowledgement that scientists cannot avoid affecting
those phenomena they study. They admit that there may be many interpretations of reality, but
maintain that these interpretations are in themselves a part of the scientific knowledge they are
pursuing. Interpretivism has a tradition that is no less glorious than that of positivism, nor is it shorter.
46 | P a g e
How to become a Researcher?
Laboratory experiments permit the researcher to identify precise relationships between a small number
of variables that are studied intensively via a designed laboratory situation using quantitative analytical
techniques with a view to making generalisable statements applicable to real-life situations. The key
weakness of laboratory experiments is the "limited extent to which identified relationships exist in the
real world due to oversimplification of the experimental situation and the isolation of such situations
from most of the variables that are found in the real world"(Galliers, 1991, p.150).
Field experiments extend laboratory experiments into real organisations and their real life situations,
thereby achieving greater realism and diminishing the extent to which situations can be criticised as
contrived. In practice it is difficult to identify organisations that are prepared to be experimented on and
still more difficult to achieve sufficient control to make replication viable.
Table 1 - Taxonomy of Research Methodologies
Scientific/Positivist Interpretivist/Anti-positivist
Laboratory Experiments Subjective/Argumentative
Field Experiments Reviews
Surveys Action Research
Case Studies Case Studies
Theorem Proof Descriptive/Interpretive
Forecasting Futures Research
Simulation Role/Game Playing
Surveys enable the researcher to obtain data about practices, situations or views at one point in time
through questionnaires or interviews. Quantitative analytical techniques are then used to draw
inferences from this data regarding existing relationships. The use of surveys permit a researcher to
study more variables at one time than is typically possible in laboratory or field experiments, whilst data
can be collected about real world environments. A key weakness is that it is very difficult to realise
insights relating to the causes of or processes involved in the phenomena measured. There are, in
addition, several sources of bias such as the possibly self-selecting nature of respondents, the point in
time when the survey is conducted and in the researcher him/herself through the design of the survey
itself.
Case studies involve an attempt to describe relationships that exist in reality, very often in a single
organisation. Case studies may be positivist or interpretivist in nature, depending on the approach of the
researcher, the data collected and the analytical techniques employed. Reality can be captured in
greater detail by an observer-researcher, with the analysis of more variables than is typically possible in
experimental and survey research. Case studies can be considered weak as they are typically restricted
to a single organisation and it is difficult to generalise findings since it is hard to find similar cases with
similar data that can be analysed in a statistically meaningful way. Furthermore, different researchers
may have different interpretations of the same data, thus adding research bias into the equation.
Simulation involves copying the behaviour of a system. Simulation is used in situations where it would
be difficult normally to solve problems analytically and typically involves the introduction of random
variables. As with experimental forms of research, it is difficult to make a simulation sufficiently realistic
so that it resembles real world events. Forecasting/futures research involves the use of techniques such
as regression analysis and time series analysis to make predictions about likely future events. It is a
useful form of research in that it attempts to cope with the rapid changes that are taking place in IT and
predict the impacts of these changes on individuals, organisations or society. However, it is a method
that is fraught with difficulties relating to the complexity of real world events, the arbitrary nature of
future changes and the lack of knowledge about the future. Researchers cannot build true visions of the
future, but only scenarios of possible futures and so impacts under these possible conditions.
47 | P a g e
How to become a Researcher?
1. To gain familiarity with a phenomenon or to achieve new insights into it (studies with this object
in view are termed as exploratory or formulative research studies);
2. To portray accurately the characteristics of a particular individual, situation or a group (studies
with this object in view are known as descriptive research studies);
3. To determine the frequency with which something occurs or with which it is associated with
something else (studies with this object in view are known as diagnostic research studies);
4. To test a hypothesis of a causal relationship between variables (such studies are known as
hypothesis-testing research studies).
However, this is not an exhaustive list of factors motivating people to undertake research studies.
Many more factors such as directives of government, employment conditions, curiosity about new
things, desire to understand causal relationships, social thinking and awakening, and the like may as well
motivate (or at times compel) people to perform research operations.
48 | P a g e
How to become a Researcher?
49 | P a g e
How to become a Researcher?
(iv) Conceptual vs. Empirical: Conceptual research is that related to some abstract idea(s) or theory. It
is generally used by philosophers and thinkers to develop new concepts or to reinterpret existing
ones. On the other hand, empirical research relies on experience or observation alone, often
without due regard for system and theory. It is data-based research, coming up with conclusions
which are capable of being verified by observation or experiment. We can also call it as
experimental type of research. In such a research it is necessary to get at facts firsthand, at their
source, and actively to go about doing certain things to stimulate the production of desired
information. In such a research, the researcher must first provide himself with a working
hypothesis or guess as to the probable results. He then works to get enough facts (data) to prove or
disprove his hypothesis. He then sets up experimental designs which he thinks will manipulate the
persons or the materials concerned so as to bring forth the desired information. Such research is
thus characterized by the experimenter’s control over the variables under study and his deliberate
manipulation of one of them to study its effects. Empirical research is appropriate when proof is
sought that certain variables affect other variables in some way. Evidence gathered through
experiments or empirical studies is today considered to be the most powerful support possible for
a given hypothesis.
(v) Some Other Types of Research: All other types of research are variations of one or more of the
above stated approaches, based on either the purpose of research, or the time required to
accomplish research, on the environment in which research is done, or on the basis of some other
similar factor. Form the point of view of time, we can think of research either as one-time research or
longitudinal research. In the former case the research is confined to a single time-period, whereas in
the latter case the research is carried on over several time-periods. Research can be field-setting
research or laboratory research or simulation research, depending upon the environment in which it
is to be carried out. Research can as well be understood as clinical or diagnostic research. Such
research follow case-study methods or in depth approaches to reach the basic causal relations. Such
studies usually go deep into the causes of things or events that interest us, using very small samples
and very deep probing data gathering devices. The research may be exploratory or it may be
formalized. The objective of exploratory research is the development of hypotheses rather than their
testing, whereas formalized research studies are those with substantial structure and with specific
hypotheses to be tested. Historical research is that which utilizes historical sources like documents,
remains, etc. to study events or ideas of the past, including the philosophy of persons and groups at
any remote point of time. Research can also be classified as conclusion-oriented and decision-
oriented. While doing conclusion oriented research, a researcher is free to pick up a problem,
redesign the enquiry as he proceeds and is prepared to conceptualize as he wishes. Decision-oriented
research is always for the need of a decision maker and the researcher in this case is not free to
embark upon research according to his own inclination. Operations research is an example of
decision oriented research since it is a scientific method of providing executive departments with a
quantitative basis for decisions regarding operations under their control. The above description of
the types of research brings to light the fact that there are two basic approaches to research, viz.,
quantitative approach and the qualitative approach. The former involves the generation of data in
quantitative form which can be subjected to rigorous quantitative analysis in a formal and rigid
fashion. This approach can be further sub-classified into inferential, experimental and simulation
approaches to research. The purpose of inferential approach to research is to form a data base from
which to infer characteristics or relationships of population. This usually means survey research
where a sample of population is studied (questioned or observed) to determine its characteristics,
and it is then inferred that the population has the same characteristics. Experimental approach is
characterized by much greater control over the research environment and in this case some variables
50 | P a g e
How to become a Researcher?
are manipulated to observe their effect on other variables. Simulation approach involves the
construction of an artificial environment within which relevant information and data can be
generated. This permits an observation of the dynamic behavior of a system (or its sub-system) under
controlled conditions. The term ‘simulation’ in the context of business and social sciences
applications refers to “the operation of a numerical model that represents the structure of a dynamic
process. Given the values of initial conditions, parameters and exogenous variables, a simulation is
run to represent the behavior of the process over time.” Simulation approach can also be useful in
building models for understanding future conditions.
Qualitative approach to research is concerned with subjective assessment of attitudes, opinions and
behavior. Research in such a situation is a function of researcher’s insights and impressions. Such an
approach to research generates results either in non-quantitative form or in the form which are not
subjected to rigorous quantitative analysis. Generally, the techniques of focus group interviews,
projective techniques and depth interviews are used. All these are explained at length in chapters
that follow.
(i) For one who is preparing himself for a career of carrying out research, the importance of knowing
research methodology and research techniques is obvious since the same constitute the tools of
his trade. The knowledge of methodology provides good training especially to the new research
worker and enables him to do better research. It helps him to develop disciplined thinking or a
‘bent of mind’ to observe the field objectively. Hence, those aspiring for careerism in research
must develop the skill of using research techniques and must thoroughly understand the logic
behind them.
(ii) Knowledge of how to do research will inculcate the ability to evaluate and use research results
with reasonable confidence. In other words, we can state that the knowledge of research
methodology is helpful in various fields such as government or business administration,
community development and social work where persons are increasingly called upon to evaluate
and use research results for action.
(iii) When one knows how research is done, then one may have the satisfaction of acquiring a new
intellectual tool which can become a way of looking at the world and of judging every day
experience. Accordingly, it enables use to make intelligent decisions concerning problems facing
us in practical life at different points of time. Thus, the knowledge of research methodology
provides tools to took at things in life objectively.
(iv) In this scientific age, all of us are in many ways consumers of research results and we can use
them intelligently provided we are able to judge the adequacy of the methods by which they
have been obtained. The knowledge of methodology helps the consumer of research results to
evaluate them and enables him to take rational decisions.
51 | P a g e
How to become a Researcher?
1. The purpose of the research should be clearly defined and common concepts be used.
2. The research procedure used should be described in sufficient detail to permit another
researcher to repeat the research for further advancement, keeping the continuity of what has
already been attained.
3. The procedural design of the research should be carefully planned to yield results that are as
objective as possible.
4. The researcher should report with complete frankness, flaws in procedural design and estimate
their effects upon the findings.
5. The analysis of data should be sufficiently adequate to reveal its significance and the methods of
analysis used should be appropriate. The validity and reliability of the data should be checked
carefully.
6. Conclusions should be confined to those justified by the data of the research and limited to
those for which the data provide an adequate basis.
7. Greater confidence in research is warranted if the researcher is experienced, has a good
reputation in research and is a person of integrity.
About the Author: Dr. D. Neelima Satyamr did her B-Tech in Civil Engineering from Sri Venkateshwara
University, Tirupathi and M-Tech from IIT-Delhi, in Geo-technical Engineering. She
obtained her Ph. D from IIT-Delhi. She was earlier Associate Professor at VNR
Vignana Jyothi College of Engineering and currently Assistant Professor at
International Institute of Information Technology (IIIT-Hyderabad). She is also
Visiting faculty at National Academy of construction and associated with professional
bodies like Indian Concrete Institute, Indian Geotechnical society, Indian Society of
Earthquake Technology, Institution of Engineers (India), American Society of Civil
Engineering, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, International Society for Soil
Dr. D. Neelima Satyam Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering
52 | P a g e
How to become a Researcher?
Intellectual Property (IP) is a buzz word that you as a young researcher should expect to know more.
Most of us have heard words like patent, copyrights, trademarks, trade names, service marks, industrial
designs, undisclosed indications, geographical indications, etc... But do we really know what they are?
Well, if your interest is towards knowing them, then you have the right book in your hand. This section
of this book will address your needs. Happy reading!
We have organized the contents into two big chunks: Intellectual Property Overview; Patents. All though
patents are a part of intellectual property, keeping in mind the extensive information that you guys
would be interested in, we choose to take Patents as a division. This division is again sliced into five
modules: Patents; How to Get a Patent; Patenting Abroad; Commercializing Patented Technology;
Enforcing Patents.
In simple words, the ideas or thoughts that one owns is a form of property. Hence, it’s imperative to
protect ones property and cash it. You might have a question, what if someone uses my idea or
technology (infringement) or how do I protect my ideas or work or what can I protect and what cannot.
To understand more, let’s drill in and see the types of IP.
53 | P a g e
How to become a Researcher?
Copyright is granted to original artistic, musical, audio, usual, literary works, which are created by
artists. The rights include rights of reproduction, communication to the public, adaptation and
translation of work. Copyright protection applies to a wide range of works, including computer
programs. These are usually indicated by symbol: ©
Trademarks and Service marks are distinctive symbols, signs, logos that help the consumer to
distinguish between competitor goods or services and are a major part of the good will the company
enjoys in the trade. A Trade name is the name of an enterprise which catches the attention of the
public. They are Indicators of good quality. There are no quality standards for trade mark. Trademarks
are usually indentified by the symbol: ™ e.g. ABC™
A Geographical indication is a sign used on goods that have a specific geographical origin and posses the
specialties of the particular region. These goods have an advantage over other goods in the race. This IP
is having great commercial significance.
An Industrial design is the aesthetic design for an article. It can have shape and surface, color, and they
improve the aesthetic appearance of the product.
A patent is a statutory right granted for a limited period (usually 20 years) to an inventor in respect of an
invention to exclude any other person from manufacturing, using or selling the patented product or
from using the patented process, without the consent of the owner.
Layout design of IC is a relatively new area in IP which has appeared with electronics field making
advances. The design of circuitry of a chip requires great investment of knowledge. You may be able to
obtain protection for an original layout design (or topography) of an integrated circuit used in
microchips and semiconductor chips. Such protection may extend also to the final product incorporating
the layout design. Protection of a layout design is not a monopoly right.
54 | P a g e
How to become a Researcher?
New plant varieties. In many countries, a breeder of a new plant variety, which fulfils the requirements
of novelty, distinctness, uniformity and stability, and is designated with a suitable denomination may
obtain protection in the form of “plant breeder's rights.” For more information on the protection of new
plant varieties, see: www.upov.int
6.2 Patents
A complex product (such as a camera, mobile phone, or a car) may incorporate a number of inventions
that are covered by several patents, which may be owned by different patent holders.
A patent is granted by the national patent office of a country or a regional patent office for a group of
countries. It is valid for a limited period of time, generally for 20 years from the date of filing of the
patent application, provided the required maintenance fees are paid on time. A patent is a territorial
right, limited to the geographical boundary of the relevant country or region.
In return for the exclusive right provided by a patent, the applicant is required to disclose the invention
to the public by providing a detailed, accurate and complete written description of the invention in the
patent application. The granted patent and, in many countries, the patent application is made public via
publication in an official journal or gazette.
What is an invention?
In patent jargon, an invention is generally defined as a new and inventive solution to a technical
problem. It may relate to the creation of an entirely new device, product, method or process, or may
simply be an incremental improvement to a known product or process. Merely finding something that
already exists in nature generally does not qualify as an invention; an adequate amount of human
ingenuity, creativity and inventiveness must be involved.
While most inventions nowadays are the result of considerable efforts and long-term investments in
Research and Development (R&D), many simple and inexpensive technical improvements, of great
market value, have yielded significant income and profits to their inventors or companies.
55 | P a g e
How to become a Researcher?
Invention refers to a technical solution to a technical problem. It may be an innovative idea or may be in
the form of a working model or prototype. Innovation refers to the translation of the invention into a
marketable product or process.
The exclusive rights provided by a patent may be crucial for innovative companies to prosper in a
challenging, risky and dynamic business climate. Key reasons for patenting inventions include:
Strong market position and competitive advantage: A patent gives its owner the exclusive right to
prevent or stop others from commercially using the patented invention, thereby reducing uncertainty,
risk and competition from free riders and imitators. If your company owns or obtains the permission to
exploit a valuable patented invention it may be able to create a market entry barrier for competitors in
respect of the same inventions. This will help it to become a pre-eminent player in the relevant
market(s).
Higher profit or returns on investment. If your company has invested a significant amount of time and
money in R&D, patent protection of the resulting inventions would help in recovering costs and
obtaining higher returns on investments.
Additional income from licensing or assigning the patent: As a patent owner you may license your
rights over the invention to others in exchange for lump sum payments and/or royalties, in order to
generate additional income for the company. Selling (or assigning) a patent implies transfer of
ownership, whereas licensing implies only permission to use the licensed invention under specified
conditions.
Access to new markets: Licensing of patents (or even pending patent applications) to others may
provide access to new markets, which are otherwise inaccessible. In order to do so, the invention must
also be protected in the relevant foreign market(s).
Diminished risks of infringement: By obtaining patent protection you will be able to prevent others
from patenting the same invention and also reduce the chances of infringing the rights of others when
commercializing your products. While a patent by itself does not provide the “freedom to use”, it does
56 | P a g e
How to become a Researcher?
prevent others from patenting the same or similar inventions and provides a reasonable indication that
the invention that you have patented is new and significantly different from the “prior art.”
Enhanced ability to obtain grants and/or raise funds at a reasonable rate of interest. Ownership of
patents (or license to use patents owned by others) may enhance your ability to raise capital to take a
product to market. In some sectors (e.g., biotechnology), it is often necessary to have a strong patent
portfolio to attract venture capitalists.
A powerful tool to take action against imitators and free riders: In order to effectively enforce the
exclusivity provided by a patent, it may occasionally be necessary to litigate, or bring your patents to the
attention of those who are violating your patent rights. Owning a patent considerably improves your
ability to take successful legal action against copiers and imitators of the protected invention.
Positive image for your enterprise: Business partners, investors, shareholders and customers may
perceive patent portfolios as a demonstration of the high level of expertise, specialization and
technological capacity of your company. This may prove useful for raising funds, finding business
partners and raising your company’s profile and market value. Some companies mention or list their
patents in advertisements to project an innovative image to the public.
A patent may be expensive and difficult to obtain, maintain and enforce. To file or not to file a patent
application is strictly a business decision. It should be based primarily on the probability of obtaining
commercially useful protection for the invention that is likely to provide significant benefits from its
eventual business use. Factors to be taken into account in deciding whether or not to file a patent
application include:
• Is there a market for the invention?
• What are the alternatives to your invention, and how do they compare with your invention?
• Is the invention useful for improving an existing product or developing a new product? If so,
does it fit in with your company’s business strategy?
• Are there potential licensees or investors who will be willing to help to take the invention to
market?
• How valuable will the invention be to your business and to competitors?
• Is it easy to “reverse engineer” your invention from your product or “design around” it?
• How likely are others, especially competitors, to invent and patent what you have invented?
• Do the expected profits from an exclusive position in the market justify the costs of patenting?
• What aspects of the invention can be protected by one or more patents, how broad can this
coverage be and will this provide commercially useful protection?
• Will it be easy to identify violation of the patent rights and are you ready to invest time and
financial resources for enforcing your patent(s)?
57 | P a g e
How to become a Researcher?
The best way of understanding these requirements is to study what has been patented by others in the
technical field of your interest. For this, you may consult patent databases.
The definition of prior art differs considerably from country to country. In many countries, any
information disclosed to the public anywhere in the world in written form, by oral communication, by
display or through public use constitutes prior art. Thus, in principle, the publication of the invention in a
scientific journal, its presentation in a conference, its use in commerce or its display in a company’s
catalogue would all constitute acts that could destroy the novelty of the invention and render it not
patentable. It is important to prevent accidental disclosure of inventions prior to filing the patent
application.
58 | P a g e
How to become a Researcher?
Assistance of a competent patent agent is often crucial for a clear determination of what is included in
the prior art. Prior art often includes “secret prior art” such as pending unpublished patent applications,
provided they are published at a later stage.
Some examples of what may not qualify as inventive, as established by past court decisions in some
countries, are: mere change of size; making a product portable; the reversal of parts; the change of
materials; or the mere substitution by an equivalent part or function.
The utility requirement has become particularly important for patents on genetic sequences for which a
utility may not yet be known at the time of filing the application.
59 | P a g e
How to become a Researcher?
While this may seem a subtle distinction, it is essential in understanding the patent system and how
multiple patents interact. In fact, patents owned by others may overlap, encompass or complement
your own patent. You may, therefore, need to obtain a license to use other people’s inventions in order
to commercialize your own patented invention and vice versa. Also, before certain inventions (such as
pharmaceutical drugs) can be commercialized other clearances may be required (e.g., marketing
approval from the relevant regulatory body).
Employee inventions: In many countries, inventions developed in the course of employment are
automatically assigned to the employer. In some countries, this is only so if it is so stated in the
employment contract. In some cases (e.g., if there is no employment agreement) the inventor may
retain the right to exploit the invention, but the employer is given a non-exclusive right to use the
invention for its internal purposes (called “shop rights”). It is important to find out about the specific
legislation in your own country and to ensure that employment contracts deal with issues of ownership
over employee inventions to avoid future disputes.
Joint inventors: When more than one person contributes in significant ways to the conception and
realization of an invention, they must be treated as joint inventors and mentioned as such in the patent
application. If the joint inventors are also the applicants, the patent will be granted to them jointly.
Joint owners: Different countries and institutions have different rules concerning the exploitation or
enforcement of patents that are owned by more than one entity or person. In some cases, no single co-
owner may license a patent or sue third parties for infringement without the consent of all other co-
owners.
60 | P a g e
How to become a Researcher?
A prior art patentability search can prevent you from wasting money on a patent application if the
search uncovers prior art references that are likely to preclude the patenting of your invention.
A prior art search should extend to all relevant non patent literature, including technical and scientific
journals, textbooks, conference proceedings, theses, websites, company brochures, trade publications
and newspaper articles.
Patent information is a unique source of classified technical information, which companies may find of
great value for their strategic business planning. Most significant inventions are disclosed to the public
for the first time only when the patent or patent application is published. Thus, patents and published
patent applications provide means of learning about current research and innovations often long before
the relevant innovative product appears on the market. Patent searches should be part of the essential
inputs to any company’s R&D effort.
In addition, most national patent offices offer patent search services for a fee. While access to patent
information is considerably simpler thanks to the Internet, it is not easy to perform a high-quality patent
search. Patent jargon is often complex and obscure and professional searching requires considerable
knowledge and expertise. While preliminary searches may be performed through free on-line patent
databases, most companies requiring patent information for making key business decisions (e.g.,
whether to apply for a patent or not) will generally rely on the services of patent professionals and/or
use more sophisticated commercial databases.
A prior art search can be done based on keywords, patent classification or other search criteria. The
prior art uncovered depends on the search strategy employed, the classification system used, the
technical expertise of the person who conducts the search, and the patent database being used.
61 | P a g e
How to become a Researcher?
The task of preparing a patent application is generally performed by a patent attorney or agent who will
represent your interests during the application process. The box on the following page provides a basic
overview of the application process. Note that there may be important variations between countries
and it is always best to check with the patent office of the relevant country or a patent law firm in the
relevant country to obtain up-to-date information on procedures and applicable fees.
62 | P a g e
How to become a Researcher?
Nevertheless, rushing to file a patent application as soon as you have an invention may also be a
problem for the following reasons:
• If you apply too early and subsequently make changes to your invention it will generally not be
possible to make significant changes to the original description of the invention.
• Once you have filed your application in one country or region, you normally have 12 months to
file an application for the same invention in all the countries of interest to your business in
order to enjoy the benefit of the filing date of your first application. This may be a problem if
the costs of applying in various countries and paying the maintenance fees are too high for your
company. One way of mitigating this problem, is by postponing the payments of translation and
national fees for a period of 30 months by using the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT).
When deciding on the timing for filing a patent application, it is important to bear in mind that the
application should be filed before disclosing the invention. Any disclosure before filing the application
(e.g., for test-marketing, to investors or other business partners) should be done only after signing a
confidentiality or nondisclosure agreement.
63 | P a g e
How to become a Researcher?
Patent applications are similarly structured worldwide and consist of a request, a description, claims,
drawings (if necessary) and an abstract. A patent document may be anywhere between a few pages to
hundreds of pages long, depending on the nature of the specific invention and the technical field
Request: It contains information on the title of the invention, the date of filing, the priority date and
bibliographic data such as the name and address of the applicant and inventor.
Description: The written description of an invention must describe the invention in sufficient detail so
that anyone skilled in the same technical field can reconstruct and practice the invention from the
description and the drawings without putting in further inventive effort. If this is not the case, the
patent may not be granted or may be revoked after it is challenged in a court action.
Claims: The claims determine the scope of protection of a patent. The claims are absolutely crucial to a
patented invention since, if they are badly drafted, even a truly valuable invention could result in a
worthless patent that is easy to circumvent or design around. In patent litigation, interpreting the claims
is generally the first step in determining whether the patent is valid and in determining whether the
patent has been infringed. It is strongly advisable to seek the advice of an expert to draft patent
applications, particularly the claims.
Drawings: The drawings show the technical details of the invention in an abstract and visual way. They
help to explain some information, tool or result set out in the disclosure. Drawings are not always a
necessary part of the application. If the invention is for a process or method of doing something,
drawings usually are not required. If drawings are required, formal rules govern their acceptability.
Abstract: The abstract is a brief summary of the invention. When the patent is published by the patent
office, the abstract is included on the front page. The abstract is sometimes improved or drafted by the
patent examiner in the relevant patent office.
64 | P a g e
How to become a Researcher?
All these aspects require in-depth knowledge of patent law and patent office practice.
Therefore, even if legal or technical assistance is generally not mandatory it is strongly recommended. It
is advisable to rely on a patent agent who has the relevant legal knowledge and experience as well as
the technical background in the technical field of the invention. Most laws require foreign applicants to
be represented by a registered patent agent who is resident in the country.
Can you apply for protection of many inventions through a single application?
Most patent laws provide for certain limitations in respect of the number of different inventions that
may be included in one patent application. These limitations include the so-called requirement of unity
of invention. Whereas some patent laws provide for other types of requirements of unity of invention
(for example, the patent law of the United States of America), others (e.g., the European Patent
Convention and the Patent Cooperation Treaty) permit groups of inventions so linked as to form a single
“inventive concept” to be included in a single application. In case of lack of unity of invention, the
applicant may be required to either restrict the claims or divide the application (divisional applications).
As a result of differences in the applicable law, one patent application may suffice in some countries,
while in others; two or more applications may have to be filed to cover the same ground.
Patent protection in foreign countries will enable your company to enjoy exclusive rights over the
patented invention in those countries. In addition, patenting abroad may enable your company to
license the invention to foreign firms, develop outsourcing relationship, and access those markets in
partnership with others.
66 | P a g e
How to become a Researcher?
After the expiration of the priority period and until the patent is first published by the patent office
(generally 18 months after the priority date) you will still have the possibility to apply for protection for
the same invention in other countries, but you can no longer claim priority of your earlier application.
Once the invention has been disclosed or published, you may be unable to obtain patent protection in
foreign countries, due to loss of novelty.
The international route: If your company wants to have the option of protecting an invention in any
number of member countries of the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT), then you should consider filing an
international PCT application. To be eligible to do so, you must be a national or resident of a PCT
Contracting State or, your business must have a real and effective industrial or commercial presence in
one of these countries. By filing one international application under the PCT, you may simultaneously
seek patent protection for an invention in the more than 125 member countries of the PCT. This
application may be filed either at your national or regional patent office and/or at the PCT receiving
office at the World Intellectual Property Office (WIPO) in Geneva, Switzerland.
67 | P a g e
How to become a Researcher?
There may be occasions when an assignment is advantageous. If a patent is sold for a lump sum, you get
the value immediately, without having to wait up to 20 years to realize that value progressively. You also
avoid the risk that the patent may be superseded by another technology. In addition, assignment of the
patent to a start-up company may be a precondition for funding, if the patent does not belong to the
company.
68 | P a g e
How to become a Researcher?
In each case, it is an individual decision, based on your needs and priorities. However, assigning a patent
is generally not recommended and patent owners generally prefer to maintain ownership over their
inventions and grant licenses.
As a license agreement requires skillful negotiations and drafting, it is advisable to seek the assistance of
a licensing practitioner for negotiating the terms and conditions and for drafting the licensing
agreement. In some countries, licensing agreements need to be registered with a government
regulatory authority.
What royalty rate should you expect to receive for your patent?
In licensing deals, the owner of the right is generally remunerated through lump-sum payments and/or
through recurring royalties, which may be based on sales volume of the licensed product (per unit
royalty) or on net sales (net sales-based royalty). In many cases, the remuneration for a patent license is
a combination of a lump-sum payment and royalties. Sometimes, an equity stake in the company of the
licensee may replace a royalty.
While industry standards for royalty rates exist for particular industries and may usefully be consulted, it
must be remembered that each licensing agreement is unique and the royalty rate depends on the
particular and very distinct factors being negotiated. Therefore, industry standards may provide some
useful initial guidance but too great a reliance on such standards is often misplaced.
69 | P a g e
How to become a Researcher?
In a single licensing agreement, there may be provisions that grant some rights on an exclusive basis and
others on a sole or non exclusive basis.
If you are interested in a competitor’s patent, can you obtain permission to use it?
It may not always be easy or affordable to obtain authorization to incorporate technology owned by a
competitor into your products/processes. However, if your competitor is also interested in your
company’s patents, then you should think of cross-licensing. Cross-licensing is very common in
industries where a number of patents covering a wide range of complementary inventions are held by
two or more competitors. Such competing companies seek to ensure their freedom to operate by
obtaining the right to use patents owned by their competitors while providing the right to use their own
patents to the competitors.
70 | P a g e
How to become a Researcher?
The exclusive rights granted by a patent give the patent owner the opportunity to prevent or stop
competitors from making products and using processes that infringe on its rights and to seek
compensation for damages suffered. To prove that infringement has occurred, it must be shown that
each and every element of a given claim, or its equivalent, is contained in the infringing product or
process. Enforcing your rights when you believe that your patented invention is being copied may be
crucial to maintaining your competitive edge, market share and profitability.
What should you do if your patent is being used by others without your authorization?
If you believe that others are infringing your patent, i.e., using it without your authorization, then, as a
first step, you need to collect information about infringing parties and their use of the infringing product
or process. You should accumulate all available facts to determine the nature and timing of your action.
Always engage a patent lawyer to assist you in making a decision on the infringement of your patented
invention. In some cases, when infringement is detected, companies choose to send a letter (commonly
known as a “cease and desist letter”) informing the alleged infringer of a possible conflict between your
rights and the other company’s business activity. This procedure is often effective in the case of non-
intentional infringement since the infringer will in many such cases either discontinue such activities or
agree to negotiate a licensing agreement.
Sometimes, however, surprise is the best tactic in order to avoid giving the infringer time to hide or
destroy evidence. In these circumstances, it might be appropriate to go to court without giving notice to
the infringer and to ask for an “interim injunction” in order to surprise the infringer by a raid, often with
the help of the police, at his business premises. The court may order that the alleged infringers stop
their infringing action pending the outcome of a trial (which may take many months or years).
However, the question of whether a patent has been infringed may be very complex and a decision may,
therefore, only be taken in proceedings on the merits of the case. Where the company decides to
initiate civil proceedings, the courts generally provide a wide range of civil remedies to compensate
aggrieved owners of patent rights. A patent lawyer will be able to provide you the relevant information.
In order to prevent the importation of goods infringing patents, measures at the international border
may be available to patent holders in some countries through the national customs authorities. Many
countries, however, provide for border measures in accordance with their international obligations only
in cases of importation of counterfeit trademark goods and pirated copyright goods. As a general rule, if
you identify infringement, it is highly advisable to seek professional legal advice.
71 | P a g e
How to become a Researcher?
What are your options for settling the patent infringement out of court?
If the dispute is with a company with which there is a signed contract (e.g., a licensing agreement), then
first check whether there is an arbitration or mediation clause in the contract. It is advisable to include a
special provision in contracts for the dispute to be referred to arbitration or mediation in order to avoid
long and expensive litigation. It may be possible to use alternative dispute resolution systems, such as
arbitration or mediation, even if there is no clause in the contract or no contract at all, as long as both
parties agree to it.
Arbitration generally has the advantage of being a less formal and shorter procedure than court
proceedings, and an arbitral award is more easily enforceable internationally. An advantage of
mediation is that the parties retain control of the dispute resolution process. As such, it can help to
preserve good business relations with another enterprise with which your company may wish to
collaborate in the future. The WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center provides services for alternative
dispute resolution. More information on arbitration and mediation can be found at:
arbiter.wipo.int/center/index.html.
References:
1. www.wipo.int/sme
2. www.patentoffice.nic.in
3. www.uspto.gov
4. www.patentoffice.nic.in
Dinesh Pandian did his M Sc. in Polymer Science from University of Madras and
M-Tech in Plastic Technology from Central Institute of Plastics Engineering and
Technology (CIPET) Chennai.
He also did his PG-Diploma in Intellectual Property Rights Management from Indra
Gandhi National Open University (IGNOU) and is currently working as Senior
Process Lead at Intellectual Property & Science, Thomson Reuters.
Dinesh Pandian
72 | P a g e
How to become a Researcher?
Generally most of the research work fails to attract the market even though the quality of
research is very high due to inefficient presentation of the work by the researchers. This chapter
on impact of presentation skills for professional development is added in this book so that the
researcher can learn the tactics of marketing his research work and bring out his innovation for
the industry.
To really succeed at presenting and build up effective presentation skills, there are several key
areas that one should know. These key skill areas are:
73 | P a g e
How to become a Researcher?
7.1.1b Preparation
The most important thing while preparing the text is to decide exactly what to say, where to find
the required information, and how to give it a proper shape. It must be logical and should have a
smooth flow from one point to the next. For beginners, it is advisable to write down the whole
speech, include the address, the opening sentences and the ending sentences. The tone of the
speech is less formal than the tone of writing. All the same there is a formality in official speaking
as distinguished from social or personal style of speaking. Bad habits, often picked up in
conversation, should not be allowed to creep into a speech, repeating phrases should be avoided
• Think about what you want to do here – why you actually need the visual aids in your
presentation and what are they going to be used for.
• Often they are fairly redundant – people put them in for the sake of it.
Some key presentation skills we’ll be looking at involve reducing the number of slides in a
presentation to the minimum required to support the message. We will further look into as how
we can make visual aids effective and what type of visual aids would help in a presentation. For
example handing out supplemental materials like articles, reports, etc. along with the
presentation, or handing out copies of the presentation, like handing out copies of the slides that
could be used as a reference during the presentation or might use transparency slides or showing
slides from a personal computer.
• If you plan to project your slides from a computer onto a projection screen, then be sure
to check out the computer system before people come into the meeting room, if at all
possible.
• Use a consistent layout, or organization of colors and images, on your materials.
• If you use transparencies on an overhead projector, then allocate one slide for every 3-5
minutes of your presentation. Include 5-8 lines of bulleted phrases on each slide.
• If you provide the supplemental information during your presentation, then your audience
will very likely read that information during your presentation, rather than listening to
you. Therefore, hand out this information after you have completed your presentation.
74 | P a g e
How to become a Researcher?
Or, hand it out at the beginning of your presentation and ask them not to read it until you
have completed your presentation.
• If you hand out copies of your slides, be sure that the text on the slides is large enough
that your audience can read the text on the table in front of them without having to hold
the handouts up to their faces. Be sure to leave space on the handouts for the audience to
make notes on them.
• If you plan to project your slides from a computer onto a projection screen, then be sure
to check out the computer system before people come into the meeting room, if at all
possible.
• Use a consistent layout, or organization of colors and images, on your materials.
• If you use transparencies on an overhead projector, then allocate one slide for every 3- 5
minutes of your presentation. Include 5-8 lines of bulleted phrases on each slide.
• If you provide the supplemental information during your presentation, then your audience
will very likely read that information during your presentation, rather than listening to
you. Therefore, hand out this information after you have completed your presentation.
Or, hand it out at the beginning of your presentation and ask them not to read it until you
have completed your presentation.
• If you hand out copies of your slides, be sure that the text on the slides is large enough
that your audience can read the text on the table in front of them without having to hold
the handouts up to their faces. Be sure to leave space on the handouts for the audience to
make notes on them.
75 | P a g e
How to become a Researcher?
Summary
So these are the 5 key elements (or presentation skills areas) for building and delivering a
successful presentation.
Get to grips with each of them, build your skills and then apply them to you next presentation –
and you’ll be surprised just how much you’ve progressed.
Every individual needs to be well equipped with the tools to communicate effectively, whether it
is on the personal front, or at work. In fact, according to the management gurus, being a good
communicator is half the battle won. After all, if one speaks and listens well, then there is little or
no scope for misunderstanding. Thus, keeping this fact in mind, the primary reasons for
misunderstanding is due to inability to speak well, or listen effectively.
Communication skills are the set of skills that enables a person to convey information so that it is
received and understood. Communication skills refer to the repertoire of behaviors that serve to
convey information for the individual.
Communication skills are the ability an individual displays in consistently demonstrates the ability
to effectively communicate with clients, colleagues, subordinates, and supervisors in professional
manner and in the personal department.
Communication skills are generally understood to be the art or technique of persuasion through
the use of oral language and written language. To understand the basic of communication skills,
one need to understand that communication is one of those words that is most hyped in
contemporary culture. It includes a large number of experiences, actions and events; also a variety
of happening and meanings, as well as technologies.
Identification is one of the key ingredients of effective communication. In fact, unless your
listeners can identify with what you are saying and with the way you are saying it, they are not
likely to receive and understand your message.”
The quote above is the underlying factor that explains the importance of communication skills. In
fact, there are other such quotes, which are as follows that explains the importance of effective
communications skills.
Good communication is as stimulating as black coffee, and just as hard to sleep after.
The newest computer can merely compound, at speed, the oldest problem in the relations
between human beings, and in the end the communicator will be confronted with the old
problem, of what to say and how to say it.
The way one communicates does not only have an impact on their own profession and personal
relations, but also an effect on others. Those who do not have appropriate communication skills
are usually ignored or simply kept at bay. Where those with good communication skills are are
76 | P a g e
How to become a Researcher?
looked upon and well respected. After all a good listener and a good orator are popular in their
groups - professional and personal.
• Sender/encoder/speaker
• Receiver/decoder/listener
• Message
• Medium
• Feedback/reply
7.2.1a Sender/encoder/Speaker:
The person who initiates the communication process is normally referred to as the sender. From
his personal data bank he selects ideas, encodes and finally transmits them to the receiver.
7.2.1b Receiver/decoder/listener:
The listener receives an encoded message which he attempts to decode. This process is carried on
in relation to the work environment and the value perceived in terms of the work situation.
7.2.1c Message:
Message is the encoded idea transmitted by the sender. The formulation of the message is very
important for an incorrect patterning can turn the receiver hostile or make him lose interest.
7.2.1d Medium:
Another important element of communication is the medium or channel. It could be oral, written,
or non-verbal, prior to the composition of the message, the medium/ channel should be decided.
7.2.1e Feedback:
This is the most important component of communication. Effective communication takes place
only when there is feedback. The errors and faults that abound in business situations are a result
of lack of feedback. Basic Model of Communication:
77 | P a g e
How to become a Researcher?
7.2.3b 4S’s
S’s Relevance
1. Shortness------ Economizes
2. Simplicity----- Impresses
3. Strength------- convinces
4. Sincerity------ appears
78 | P a g e
How to become a Researcher?
It matters not so much what you say as it does how you say it. Your communication style is a SET
of various behaviors and methods of relaying information that impact all facets of life “How to
speak.”
Guidelines:
• Speed
• Clarity
• Punctuation
• Pronunciation
• Familiarity
• Fluency
• Expression….
Teaching communication skills can be a rather daunting task, considering that almost every
individual feels that they are very good communicators. In fact, most trainers prefer to be
regarded as facilitators, who are able to bring to light the nuances that occur while communicating
ineffectively, rather than pointing a direct finger and saying - You all cannot communicate well'
79 | P a g e
How to become a Researcher?
and when this occurs the participants are ready to delve deeper within and bring out the negative
aspects of their communications and replace it with the corrective measures.
In order to practice effective speaking skills one can be read passages from a book aloud, in front
of a mirror, or simply perform a free speech in front of the mirror. And where listening is
concerned, one can try transcribing from the radio or television, etc. this helps in honing sharper
listening skills.
A Group of 6-15 candidates are made to sit in a circular or a semi-circular (U Shaped) fashion so
that they can see each other and take part in the discussion easily. Roll Numbers may be allotted
to participants for easy recognition. Before the GD, the examiner (observer) announces the topic
for discussion and informs candidates about the time-limit. He may also draw attention towards
the etiquette, rules and regulation, procedure to be followed. He also clears any doubts/queries.
The individuals of the group might be given some initial time to put down their thoughts on the
topic. The examiner observes the proceedings of the discussion from a distance without directly
80 | P a g e
How to become a Researcher?
interfering into it. He examines the performance of each candidate without any prejudice or
favour.
Every candidate is supposed to express his opinion and views on the topic given. The time for
discussion is approximately 20 minutes. A group discussion can be categorically divided into three
different phases:
• Initiation/ Introduction
• Body of the group discussion
• Summarization/ Conclusion
7.3.2a Quotes:
Quotes are an effective way of initiating a Group Discussion. If the topic of a Group Discussion is:
Should the Censor Board be abolished?, you could start with a quote like, ‘Hidden apples are
always sweet’. For a Group Discussion topic like, Customer is King, you could quote Sam (Walmart)
Walton’s famous saying, ‘there is only one boss: the customer. And he can fire everybody in the
company — from the chairman on down, simply by spending his money somewhere else.
81 | P a g e
How to become a Researcher?
7.3.2b Definition:
Start a Group Discussion by defining the topic or an important term in the topic.
For example, if the topic of the Group Discussion is Advertising is a Diplomatic Way of Telling a Lie,
why not start the Group Discussion by defining advertising as, ‘Any paid form of non-personal
presentation and promotion of ideas, goods or services through mass media like newspapers,
magazines, television or radio by an identified sponsor’?
For a topic like The Malthusian Economic Prophecy is no longer relevant, you could start by
explaining the definition of the Malthusian Economic Prophecy.
7.3.2c Questions
Asking a question is an impactive way of starting a Group Discussion. It does not signify asking a
question to any of the candidates in a Group Discussion so as to hamper the flow. It implies asking
a question, and answering it yourself. Any question that might hamper the flow of a Group
Discussion or insult a participant or play devil’s advocate must be discouraged. Questions that
promote a flow of ideas are always appreciated. For a topic like, Should India go to war with
Pakistan, you could start by asking, ‘What does war bring to the people of a nation? We have had
four clashes with Pakistan. The pertinent question is: what have we achieved?’
82 | P a g e
How to become a Researcher?
7.3.3b DON’Ts
• Do not be loud or aggressive
• Do not go overboard with enthusiasm if you are familiar with the topic
• Do not interrupt other speakers
• Do not deprecate other speakers
• Do not speak first if you are unfamiliar with the topic. Grab the opportunity to speak, you
also grab the attention of the examiner and your fellow candidates
• Do not change your opinions
• Do not ask irrelevant questions
• Do not stop abruptly
• Do not get nervous if the previous speakers have presented their points in a better way
• Do not exhibit your emotions
83 | P a g e
How to become a Researcher?
7.3.4 Tips:
• If you are a participant always try to be the most key participant.
• Put points firmly and always try to get others support too
• If you find that the discussion is going off the track then never lose an opportunity to bring
it back to stream this is the best point to score max
• Try to keep latest information on the topic
• Be very polite, people may try to provoke you to get more points but try to keep cool
• Most important, don’t wait for your turn to speak when discussion is on. Interrupt politely
if you want to put forward your points
• Last but not the least keeps a tab on the time given for discussion. Score points by
wrapping up the discussion if you feel that the discussion is heating but the time is going
to be over
• During conclusion, do end with the conclusion note. That shows your leadership quality.
References:
• Business Communication, Urmila Rai and S.M. Rai, Himalaya Publications
• Business Communication, RK Madhur, Vikas Publications Pvt Ltd
Dr. R. Suresh Kumar did his MBA and M-Phil from Shivaji University,
Maharashtra and obtained his Ph. D from the same university. He has
more than 15 years of teaching experience and is a pre-placement
trainer for MBA, MCA, B-Tech and B-Pharm students. He is visiting
faculty for AP Productivity Council and also corporate trainer for
various MNCs, Research Centres and Government organizations.
84 | P a g e