You are on page 1of 4

Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica

ISSN: 0001-6470 (Print) (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/iort19

Epidemiology of distal radius fractures

Søren Solgaard & Vivian S. Petersen

To cite this article: Søren Solgaard & Vivian S. Petersen (1985) Epidemiology of distal radius
fractures, Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica, 56:5, 391-393, DOI: 10.3109/17453678508994354

To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.3109/17453678508994354

© 1985 Informa UK Ltd All rights reserved:


reproduction in whole or part not permitted

Published online: 08 Jul 2009.

Submit your article to this journal

Article views: 849

View related articles

Citing articles: 84 View citing articles

Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at


https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=iort20
Acta Orthop Scand 56, 391-393, 1985

In the county of Frederiksborg, Denmark, all distal radius fractures in in- Wren Solgaard
habitants over 20 years of age were recorded throughout 1981; the popu- Vivian S, Petersen
lation a t risk was a quarter million, and fractures occurred in 394 women
and 99 men. The age-specific incidence confirmed the rise in osteoporotic Department of O,.thopedic
fractures over the past 20 years demonstrated recently in Malmo and surgery, ~ i l l ~ Hospital,
~0d
Oslo. DK-3400 Hillerad, Denmark

We have determined the age-specific incidence Ninety-two per cent of the radiographs were avail-
of distal radius fractures in a Danish county, able for review, and the fractures were classified ac-
and compared our observations with similar in- cording to displacement and communition (Older e t
vestigations from other countries. al. 1965). Information about the average temper-
ature and the number of days with snow-cover in the
year 1981 was obtained from the Danish Institute of
Meteorology.
Patients and methods Calculation of the confidence limits for the age-
In 1981 the county of Frederiksborg, Denmark was specific incidences was performed, and for statistical
served by five hospitals and had 224 705 inhabitants, evaluation the chi-square test with Yates’ correction
20 years of age or older. was used.
All cases of distal radius fractures, defined a s frac-
tures within 4 cm of the wrist joint, were recorded. In
the calendar year 1981,493 residents were included
in the study; some of these had had primary treat- Results
ment elsewhere.
Reduction of the fracture was performed in 46
The material consisted of 394 woman and 99 men;
32 patients were admitted to hospital for other inju-
per cent of men and in 58 per cent of women (P
= 0.02). The mechanism of injury was a fall on
ries.
The age- and sex-specific incidences were calcu- level ground in 87 per cent of the female and 64
lated on the bais of the population census January 1, per cent of the male patients (P < 0.00005).The
1981 (Table 1). For all patients the age, sex, side of rest of the fractures were caused mainly by
fracture and mechanism of injury were recorded. traffic accidents and falls from height. There

Table 1. The age-specific incidences of distal radius fractures in men and women over 20 years of age in the county of
Frederiksborg, 1981

Women Men

Age No. of Population Incidence No. of Population Incidence


fractures at risk in per 10.000 fractures a! risk in per 10.000
thousands thousands

20- 13 21 62 21 21 10
30- 29 32 92 21 31 67
40- 27 21 13 15 22 68
50- 77 15 50 16 16 98
60- 101 12 81 14 12 12
70- 95 8.2 115 11 63 18
80- 47 35 133 1 18 6
90- 5 0 74 68 - 0 20 -

Total 394 114 35 99 111 9


392 S. Solgaard and V. S. Petersen

NO OF
FRACTURES
INCIDENCE
PR 10000

200 -
100 -
50 -
20 -
10 -
54 \

20 30 Lo 50 60 70 80 90 >90 AGE 20 30 LO 50 60 70 80 90 AGE


Figure 1. Number of fractures in Older’s classification System Figure 2. Age-specific incidence of distal radius fractures in
in women (upper curves) and men (lower curves). men and women in Oslo (Falch 1983). Malmo (Bengnbr B Joh-
-Type 1 ; -._.Type 2; .... Type 3; ---_ Type 4. nell 1985) and Hillerd (present series).
.... Oslo; Malmo: -Hiller@d.

was no difference in fracture incidence be- Cooke 1959, Alffram & Bauer 1962, Knowel-
tween patients living in urban and rural areas. den et al. 1964), the incidence can be seen to
In women, the number of fractures was have increased. This has recently also been
highest during the winter months, correspond- demonstrated by Falch (1983) and by Bengner
ing to a low average temperature and a high & Johnell (1985). The incidence in Malmo
number of days with snow-cover. In men, the (BengnBr & Johnell 1985) and particularly in
number of fractures was more evenly distrib- Oslo (Falch 1983),however, was higher than in
uted throughout the year. our series (Figure 2). The higher incidence in
Eight of 452 patients with available radio- men in Norway could possibly be explained by
graphs had Smith’s fracture and two patients a higher number of fractures in the winter
had a Barton fracture. In four cases the frac- months in Oslo, but the seasonal variation
ture could not be classified. The rest of the pa- could not explain the difference between Oslo
tients had distal radius fractures of the Colles’ and Denmark in women. When only the frac-
type (Figure 1). The number of undisplaced tures sustained from April through September
fractures was high in young men, but in older are included, the incidence in Oslo was still
men the four types had a more equal distribu- higher.
tion. In women the number of undisplaced In the Norwegian investigation (Falch 1983),
fractures was maximal at age 40-50, whereas the peak incidence in women occurred in the
the number of more severely displaced and age-group 60-70 years. A similar peak has
comminuted fractures was maximal in older been demonstrated in USA (Melton & Riggs
women. 1983) and in Yugoslavia (Matkovic et al. 1979),
but in a recent investigation from Malmo
(Bengner & Johnell 1985) the peak incidence
was, as in the present series, at a higher age. A
possible explanation for these differences in in-
Discussion cidence could be a difference in the method of
When the present series of wrist-fractures is investigation. In Denmark, treatment and ra-
compared with earlier investigations (Buhr & diographic control of fractures is only possible
Epidemiology of distal radius fractures 393

in hospitals, and non-residents have been ex- References


cluded from the study. Alffram, P.-A. & Bauer, G. C. H. (1962) Epide-
The statistical analysis established that the miology of fractures of the forearm. J . Bone Joint
overall incidence in women was higher in Oslo Surg. 44-A, 105-114.
and Malmo (P < 0.00005). Calculation of con- BengnBr, U. & Johnell, 0. (1985) Increasing inci-
fidence limits for the peak incidences in Oslo dence of forearm fractures. A comparison of epi-
and Denmark, however, demonstrated no dif- demiologic patterns 25 years apart. Acta Orthop.
ference. Scand., 56, 158-160.
Earlier studies of the epidemiology of distal Buhr, A. J. & Cooke, A. M. (1959) Fracture patterns.
radius fractures have not included a classifica- Lancet 1, 531-536.
tion of the fractures. In the present study, Falch, J . A. (1983) Epidemiology of fractures of the
distal forearm in Oslo, Norway. Actu Orthop.
which is the first epidemiologic study of distal
&and. 54, 291-295.
radius fractures in Denmark, it was demon- Knowelden, J., Buhr, A. J . & Dunbar, 0. (1964) In-
strated that in men the four fracture types cidence of fractures in persons over 35 years of
were almost evenly distributed in the older age. Br. J . Prev. SOC.Med. 18, 130-141.
age-groups. In women undisplaced fractures Lucht, U. (1971) A prospective study of accidental
were seen most often in the younger age falls and resulting injuries in the home among el-
groups, whereas more severely displaced and derly people. Actu Soc.-Med. Scand. 2, 105-120.
comminuted fractures of Type 4 (Older et al. Matkovid, V., Kostial, K., Simonovid, I., Buzina, R.,
1965)were most frequent among patients aged Brodarec, A. & Nordin, B. E. C. (1979) Bone status
70-80 years. In the Malmo investigation and fracture rates in two regions of Yugoslavia.
Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 32, 540-549.
(BengnBr & Johnell 1985), the number of re-
Melton, L. J. & Riggs, B. L. (1983) Epidemiology of
duced fractures also increased with age. This age related fractures. In: "The osteoporotic syn-
probably reflects the increasing fragility of drome" (Ed. Avioli, L. V.), pp. 45-72. Grune &
bone, but as demonstrated by Lucht (1971) the Stratton, New York.
incidence of falls also increases with age, in- Older, T. M., Stabler, E. V. & Cassebaum, W. H.
dicating that the cause of the fracture is a fall, (1965)Colles fracture: Evaluation and selection of
but the severity is caused by bone fragility. therapy. J. Trauma 5, 469-476.

You might also like