Professional Documents
Culture Documents
3434
3434
Muhammad Salman
BATCH #
37
Assignment
Thought paper
Compoundable offences are those offences where, the complainant (one who has
filed the case, i.e. the victim), enter into a compromise, and agrees to have the
charges dropped against the accused. However, such a compromise, should be a
"Bonafide," and not for any consideration to which the complainant is not entitled
to.
Question No1
One of the questions posed by the Supreme Court itself during the course of the
hearing was that could a non-compoundable offence be treated as a
compoundable offence for acquittal if a coordinate compoundable offence
committed in the same case had been compounded by the relevant parties.
Answer
Justice Asif Saeed Khosa explained in the verdict that the non-compoundable
offence of terrorism was an offence distinct and independent from any other
coordinate offence committed in the same case. “Thus it is hereby held that an
offence which the law declares to be non-compoundable remains no
compoundable even if in a coordinate compoundable offence a compounding
takes place between the relevant parties,” Therefore, it added, despite any
compounding of the coordinate compoundable offence an acquittal could not be
granted in the non-compoundable offence on that sole basis.
Terrorism cases would remain non-compoundable even if the aggrieved parties
pardoned the guilt of the offender in other less heinous crime committed acquittal
cannot be given only on the basis of pardoning of the legal heirs.(Muhammad
Amin vs the state) 2002scmr 1017.
Question 2
The next question was can the sentence passed in a non-compoundable offence
be reduced on the ground that a coordinate compoundable offence committed in
the same case had been compounded by the relevant parties?
The answer in the judgement was that consideration of reduction of the sentence
lies within the discretion of the court seized with the matter and cannot be treated
as automatic.
Question no 3
The third question was which of the courts would reduce the sentence in respect
of a noncompoundable offence?
The Supreme Court explained that the trial court could reduce the sentence at the
end of trial.
CONCLUSION
“If the settlement between the parties reached in the coordinate compoundable
offence at the appellate or revisional stage before a high court or the Supreme
Court at the stage of appeal or review petition, then a prayer for reduction of the
sentence passed for commission of the non-compoundable offence can be raised
before the court seized with the pending matter.
Section 320 of the CrPC looks at compounding of offences. Compoundable
offences are less serious criminal offences and are of two different types
mentioned in tables in Section 320 of the CrPC, as follows:
Application for compounding the offence shall be made before the same court
before which the trial is proceeding. Once an offence has been compounded it
shall have the same effect, as if, the accused has been acquitted of the charges.
generally, it is the "state", i.e. police, who has filed the case, and hence the
question of complainant entering into compromise does not arise.
All those offences, which are not mentioned in the list under section (320) of CrPC,
are non-compoundable offences.