En Micro Hydro Design Aids GIZ 2005

MICROHYDRO DESIGN AIDS © 2010 for Microsoft Excel 2003
Small Hydropower Promotion Project (SHPP)/GTZ
By Mr. Pushpa Chitrakar
Worksheets Collaboration Partmers

Conductivity SHPP/GTZ, Nepal
Hydrology Email
Weir Web
Side Intake
Bottom Intake Entec AG, Switzerland
Headrace Canal Email
Headrace Pipe Web
Settling Basin
Penstock & Power Feedback
Loads on Anchor Pushpa Chitrakar
Anchor Block Stability pushpa.chitrakar@gmail.com
Turbine
Electrical Help
Machine Foundation Online Manual
Transmission Line Drawings
Loads and Benefits List of Reference
Costing & Financial Analyses
Utilities
Version: 2010.04 © Small Hydropower Promotion Project 2006 Kathmandu, Nepal
Discharge Measurement by Conductivity Meter
Small Hydropower Promotion Project (SHPP)/GTZ Spreadsheet by Mr Pushpa Chitrakar
Referances: 6,12,13,15,16 Date 23-Dec-2019
SMALL HYDROPOWER PROMOTION PROJECT/GTZ Revision 2006.05
Project Golmagad SHP
Developer Kankaimai Hydropower P Ltd
Consultant EPC Consult
Designed Pushpa Chitrakar
Checked Pushpa Chitrakar
Meter HANNA Instruments (HI 933000)
Salt Iyoo Noon Water temp: 11 deg C
Given k 1.8 Time intervals 5 sec
Salt Const. (k) 1.8000

Wt. of Salt 400 gm 1580 gm 1795 gm 0 gm
Nr of data 70 91 106 1
Baseline conductivity 25 24 24 0
Sum of readings 2062 3433 3997 0
Effective Area 1560 6245 7265 0
Discharge 462 l/s 455 l/s 445 l/s 0 l/s
Average Discharge 454 l/s
Discharge Measurement by Conductivity Meter: Golmagad SHP

mS
80
Conductivity
70
Salt =400gm, A eff =1560
Salt =1580gm, A eff =6245
60 Salt =1795gm, A eff =7265
Salt =0gm, A eff =0
50
40
30
20
10
0
Discharge
0
Measurement
50
by Conductivity
100 150
Meter: Golmagad
200
SHP
250 300
rge = 453.89 l/s
350 400 450 500 550 600
Time(sec)
Date= 2010/10/5, 11deg C, HANNA Instruments (HI 933000), Iyoo Noon, k=1.8, Salt =400gm,
Ave. Discharge A eSalt
= 453.89 l/s =1580gm, A ef Salt =1795gm,0gm,
A A eff =0
HYDROLOGICAL CALCULATIONS FOR UNGAUGED MHP RIVERS
Referances:2,2,4, 6,12,13,15,16 Date 23-Dec-2019
Project: Upper Jogmai SHP
Developer Kankai Hydropower P Ltd
INPUT
River name : Chhyota Khola
Location : Barand, Sertung VDC 2, Dhading
Measured flow for MIP method l/s: 80
Month and day of flow measurement: March 23
MIP region (1 -7) : 3
Area of basin below 3000m elevation A 3000 km2 : 1.5
Turbine discharge Qd l/s: 80
Water losses due to evaporation/flushing/seepage % of Qd : 5%
Downstream water release due to environmental reasons % of Q lowest : 10%
OUTPUT
MIP monthly average discharge Hydest Flood Flows
Month @ river To plant Return Period (yrs) Flood Discharge (m3/s)
January #NAME? #NAME? Daily Instantaneous
February #NAME? #NAME? 2 1.952 4.197
March #NAME? #NAME? 20 5.747 16.334
April #NAME? #NAME? 100 8.987 28.669
May #NAME? #NAME?
June #NAME? #NAME? Discharges (l/s) Designed As per MGSP
July #NAME? #NAME? Qturbine (Qd) 80.000 #NAME?
August #NAME? #NAME? Q diverted Qd+Qlosses 84.211 #NAME?
September #NAME? #NAME? Q losses 5% of Qd 4.211 #NAME?
October #NAME? #NAME? Q release 10% of Qlow #NAME? #NAME?
November #NAME? #NAME? Q min required @ river #NAME? #NAME?
December #NAME? #NAME? Q exceedence (month) 12 12

Annual av #NAME? #NAME?
Long Term Average Annual Hydrograph of Chhyota Khola river, Upper Jogmai SHP
12
Discharge (l/s)
10
MIP Flows Q design =80 l/s with 12-month exceedence #NAME?
0
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Months
Design of Stone Masonry Weir
Project Upper Jogmai, Ilam
4.0 Weir Section & Forces @ Normal Condition

Height ZZ (m)
3.5
3.0
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
O
0.0
1.5
2.5
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
-1.5
-1.0
-0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
2.0
3.0
-0.5
-1.0 XX (m)
Foundation and Soil

Foundation on Soil Coeff of soil at active state (ka) 0.33
Allowable bearing capacity Pall (kN/m2) 180 Soil Density (kN/m3) 20.000
Coeff of soil at rest (ko) 1 Friction coeff between block and soil m 0.5
Weir Geometry
Length L1 (m) 0.25 Height H1 (m) 3
Length L2 (m) 2 Height H2 (m) 1.5
Length L3 (m) 1 Height H3 (m) 1
Length L4 (m) 0.5 Density (kM/m3) 22
Total length L (m) 3.75 Head above crest during flood, hf (m) 0.500
Material Concrete
OUTPUT
Weight Wi
Forces (kN) LA along XX (m) Moment (kN-m)
Weir
G1 5.500 3.625 19.938
G2 132.000 2.500 330.000
G3 16.500 0.833 13.750
G4 49.500 0.750 37.125
Water (normal conditions)
W1 5.000 3.625 18.125
W2 45.000 -1.000 -45.000
W3 5.000 0.500 2.500
U1 84.375 -2.083 -175.781
Water (flood conditions)

W1 6.250 3.625 22.656
W2 61.250 -1.167 -71.458
W3 11.250 0.667 7.500
U1 103.125 -2.045 -210.938
Soil
S1 1.650 -0.333 -0.550
S2 11.250 0.500 5.625
Summantion forces Normal Flood

Sum of moments SM (kN-m) 205.731 153.648
Sum of vertical forces SV (kN) 124.125 106.625
Sum of horizontal forces SH (kN) 30.400 40.400
Overturning: Equivalent distance at which SM acts from critical point

d (m) 1.657 1.441
Eccentricity e, (m) 0.218 0.434
Allowable eccentricity e all (m) 0.625 0.625
Comment on overturning moment Ok Ok
Bearing
Pressure at base, Pmax 44.621 48.177
Pressure at base, Pmin 21.579 8.690
Comments on bearing Ok Ok
Sliding
Factor of safety against sliding, FS sl 2.042 1.320
Comment of sliding Ok Not Ok
Design of Orifice Side Intake
Spreadsheet developed by Mr. Pushpa Chitrakar, Engineering Advisor, SHPP/GTZ
Project Ankhu HEP
Developer Ankhu Hydropower P Ltd
Consultant HSEC P Ltd
Designed Neeraj Shrestha
Wall Geometry
Coarse Trashrack
Design
Flood Level
Orifice (H*B) Min 100 thick & 1000 wide
walkway Rcc slab
Normal
1
Weir Crest river level 3
.
h -h
h rf hr h sub h
.
.
LS
.
.
H
Gravel Flushing Gate h
Fb
River bed hbot Canal
.
Gravel trap (if needed)

1:30
Compacted earth/200mm
stone soling
Trashrack calculations
Input Output
Trashrack coeffieient kt 2.4 2.4
Bar thickness t mm 15.00 Headloss due to friction hf m 236.091
Clear spacing of bars b mm 75.00 Headloss due to bends hb m 0.051
Approach velocity Vo m/s 1.00 Headloss coeff K 4633.103
Angle of inclination from horizontal f deg 75.00 Total headloss ht m 236.142
Flow deviation b deg 90.00 Trashrack coeff, K1 0.8 0.8
Design Discharge Qd cumec 33.670 Surface area A surface m2 52.287
Height of trashrack bottom from river bed ht 1.250 Vertical height h m 2.250
Canal invert level (m) 890.65 Trashrack width B m 22.447
Orifice Calculations for (B = 2H or provided) rectangular canal downstream of orifice

Input
Orifice River
Velocity coeff of orifice c 0.800
0.800 Crest length L m 35.000
Velocity through orifice Vo m/s 1.5 Provided Q flood m /s 3
976.100
Manning's coeff of roughness 0.012
0.012 Q flood m3/s (Q20 for MHP with Qd>100) 16.334
Downstream submergence depth hsub m 0.100 Used Q flood 976.100
Orifice height H m 1.100 Canal & Spillway
Height of orifice from canal bed h bot m 1.250 Spillway crest height above NWL m 0.100
Provided water depth in the river hr (m) 3.500 Spillway discharge coeff 1.600
Provided canal width (m) 21.000 Provided Freeboard h fb1 m 3.000
Output
Normal Condition Flood
Canal witdth d/s of orifice 21.000 Critical depth of water at crest yc m 4.296
1/Slope of canal immediately d/s of orifice 40492 1/Slope of canal immediately d/s of orifice #NAME?
Depth of water in canal hc m 2.450 Flood head at river hf r = hw+yc m 7.896
Free board in canal h fb m 3.000 Head difference dhf #NAME?
Area of orifice A m2 22.447 Velocity through orifice Vof m/s #NAME?
Width of orifice B m 20.406 Q intake Qf cumec #NAME?
Actual velocity through orifice Vo act m/s 1.500 Depth of water at canal (hc f) m #NAME?
Canal width Wc m 21.000 Spillway
Water level difference dh m 0.179 Ls1 for Qf w/o d/s Obs m #NAME?
Water depth in the river hr = hc + dh m 3.500 Ls2 for Qf-Qd w/o d/s obstruction m #NAME?
Height of weir (hw = hr+0.1) m 3.600 Ls3 for Qf with d/s Obs m #NAME?
Spillway overtopping height h overtop m 2.600 Ls4 for Qf-Qd with d/s obstruction m #NAME?
Design of Bottom/Drop Intake
Spreadsheet developed by Mr. Pushpa Chitrakar, Engineering Advisor, SHPP/GTZ
Project Sarbari SHP
Developer Kullu, Himanchal Pradesh, India
Consultant
Critical Depth Considered
Critical Depth Not Considered
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
Weir Geometry
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
T
###
abl e 3. 4 c val ues f or b
###
###
Input 1 0. 95
River Width flood (Brf) m = 20

River Width (Br) m = 8 ho flood m = 3.000 0.9
Head/Critical Depth of u/s water (ho)m = 0.226 vo flood m/s = 4

Upstream water velocity (vo) m/s = 1.494 Design Discharge (Qd), m3/s = 2.7
River gradient (i) degrees = 9.462 Trashrack witdth/diameter (t) mm = 60 0. 85
Trashrack gradient (b) deg = 36 Trashrack clearance (a) mm = 30

Contraction coeff (m) = 0.85 Invert level of crest (masl) 500
Aspect ratio (Length across the river/Breadth along the river) = 3.54646819
0.8
Output 0. 75
c/c distance of trash rack bars d mm = 90 Qo u/s of intake (m3/s) normal = 2.700
Total head (he) m = 0.340 Qu d/s of intake (m3/s) normal = 0.000
0.7
kappa (c) = 0.749 h d/s normal (m) 0.000

velocity head (h) m = 0.170 h flood u/s= 1.906
Correction factor ( c) = 0.146 h d/s flood (m) 1.864
Length of intake (L) m = 2.249 Qof u/s of intake = Br * hof * vof (m3/s) = 325.497
Length (L' ) m = 1.819 Q in flood m3/s = 7.318
Intake length across the river (b) m = 7.975 Quf d/s of intake (m3/s) = 318.178
Area of intake (A=L' *b) m2 = 17.935
Side Intake Orific =1,1x20,41
Spreadsheet 0 0 WALL GEOMETRY
0 300
10000
500 300
WALL (mm)
9000
500 1550 8000
800 1550 7000
800 300 Top =899,05 6000
1800 300 1800 2650 Crest =894,NWL =894,HFL =898,55 NWL =893, #NAME? 5000
1800 1550 1800 8695.9694 0 3900 3800 8196 2100 2750 #NAME? 4000
2100 1550 2100 8695.9694 1800 3900 3800 8196 3100 2750 #NAME? 3000
2100 300 2100 2650 2000
3100 300 1800 2650 1000
3100 0 Canal =890,65 0
1000
2000
3000
4000
0 0 3100 300
3500 300 BASE ( mm)
1550 3100
Bottom Intake Weir Geometry

Top =500 Top =498,68 NWL =500, HFL =501,9Trashrack Width =1,82
0 0 3119.3444 0 0 2048.2735 4822 1300 1821.831 1300 0 5500
500 0 3119.3444 500 1300 2048.2735 3728 3119.3444 500 3119.3444 0
WALL (mm)
4500
1000 1821.831 3419.3444 500 3119.3444 500 2363.5406
1300 1821.831 3719.3444 0 3419.3444 500 2363.5406
3500
1300 0 3919.3444 0 3719.3444 500 2363.5406
2500
1500
500
-500
1000
5000
2000
3000
4000
BASE ( mm)
Canal Design: Proposed design and optimum canal sections
SMALL HYDROPOWER PROMOTION PROJECT/GTZ 2006.05
Revision
Project Sisne Small Hydropower Project
Developer Gautam Buddha Hydropower P Ltd
Input
Type and Name Intake Canal Tailrace Main2 Main3
Flow (m3/s) 0.185 0.145 0.145 0.145
Roughness coefficient (n) 0.020.02 0.017
0.017 0.020.02 0.02
0.02
Sectional Profile Rectangular Trapezoidal Semicircular Triangular
Side slope N (1V:NHorizontal) 0 0 0.5
0.5 0 0 0.5
Length of the canal (m) 20 40 150 120
1/Canal slope (s) 77 200 30 72
Channel Depth/diameter D (m) 0.300 0.525 0.300 0.300
Freeboard FB (m) 0.300 0.250 0.150 0.150
Channel Width (B) m 0.500 1.000 0.400 0.400
Channel Drops di m 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Channel Drops Horizontal length hi m 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Desired velocity Vo (m/s) 1.000 1.500 1.500 1.500
Output
Side slope d (degrees) 0.000 63.435 0.000 63.435
Canal slope S 0.01299 0.00500 0.03333 0.01389
Total depth H (m) 0.600 0.775 0.450 0.450
Chainage L (m) 20.000 60.000 210.000 330.000
Present canal
Area A m2 0.150 0.663 0.035 0.060
Top Width T (m) 0.500 1.525 0.400 0.400
Wetted Perimeter P (m) 1.100 2.174 0.471 0.671
Hydraulic Radius r (m) 0.136 0.305 0.075 0.089
Calculated flow (m3/s) & remarks 0.226 high 1.249 high 0.057 low 0.071 low
Comment on freeboard ok low ok ok
Velocity V m/s 1.233 0.219 4.103 2.417
Critical Velocity Vc m/s & Remarks 1,72 Ok 2.06 Ok 0,93 Not Ok 1,21 Not Ok
Headloss hl (m) 0.260 0.200 5.000 1.667
Total headloss Hl(m) 0.260 0.460 5.460 7.126
Critical dia of sediment d crit (mm) 19.481 16.769 27.500 13.665
Optimum canal
Area Ao m2 0.1850 0.0967 0.0967 0.0967
Top Width T (m) 0.6022 0.7636 0.9949 0.4867
Critical Velocity Vc m/s & Remarks 1,74 Ok 1.11 Not Ok 0,98 Not Ok 1.4 Not Ok
Hydraulic Radius ro (m) 0.1505 0.1180 0.1244 0.1088
Channel Depth/diameter Do (m) 0.301 0.236 0.497 0.218
Freeboard Fbo (m) 0.150 0.263 0.150 0.150
Total depth Ho (m) 0.451 0.498 0.647 0.368
Channel Width Bo (m) 0.602 0.528 0.995 0.487
Canal Slope 0.0050 0.0112 0.0145 0.0173
Headloss hlo (m) 0.100 0.449 2.175 2.079
Total headloss Hlo(m) 0.100 0.549 2.724 4.803
Critical dia of sediment d crito (mm) 8.271 14.584 19.834 20.736
HEADRACE PIPE CALCULATIONS
Referances: 2,4, 6,12,13,15,16 Date 23-Dec-2019
Project: Upper Jogmai SHP Location: Jogmai
INPUT
Economic life (years) 15
Hydraulics:
Diversion flow Qd (m3/s) 0.160 U/S Invert Level (m) 1950.00
Flow in each pipe Qi (m3/s) 0.160 % head available or headloss hlt (m) 95.00%
Gross headHg (m) 7.000 Entrance Type
0.8 0.8
Bending radius (r/d)
0.3 0.3
Headrace pipe
Pipe Material HDPE Exit (Yes/No) Yes
Welded / Flat rolled if steel NA No of pipes 1.00
Rolled if steel NA Bending angle 01 20.00
Type if steel NA Bending angle 02 4.00
Burried or exposed Burried Bending angle 03 6.00
Type of valve 0 Bending angle 04 20.00
Non standard ultimate tensile strength (UTS) N/mm2 0 Bending angle 05
Estimated pipe diameter d(mm) 282 Bending angle 06
Provided pipe diameter d(mm) 260 Bending angle 07
Min pipe thickness t (mm) NA Bending angle 08
Provided pipe thickness t (mm) 3.0 Bending angle 09
Pipe Length L (m) 140.000 Bending angle 10
Trashrack
2.40 k t b Vo f b Q H
2.40 6.00 20.00 1.00 60.00 0.00 0.160 3.00
Expansion Joints
Tmax (deg) T installation Tmin 1st Pipe length(m) 2nd Pipe L (m) 3rd Pipe L (m) 4th Pipe L (m) 5th Pipe L (m)
40 20 4 50.00 100.00 150.00 200.00 250.00
OUTPUT
Trashrack
Min Submergence CGL=1.5v^2/2g
hf hb H coeff H S B
0.0213 0.0000 0.4174 0.0213 0.8006 0.23 1.39 0.69
Turbulent loss coefficients

K inlet 0.80 K bend 05 0.00 K bend 10 0.00
K bend 01 0.16 K bend 06 0.00 K valve 0.00
K bend 02 0.13 K bend 07 0.00 K exit 1.00
K bend 03 0.13 K bend 08 0.00 K others
K bend 04 0.16 K bend 09 0.00 K Total 2.37
Hydraulics
Pipe Area A (m2) 0.053 U/S Invert Level (mAOD) 1950.000
Hydraulic Radius R (m) 0.07 D/S Invert Level (mAOD) 1943.000
Velocity V (m/s) 3.01 Is HL tot < HL available OKAY
Pipe Roughness ks (mm) 0.06 Friction Losses hf (m) 3.82
Relative Roughness ks/d 0.00023 Fitting Losses hfit (m) 1.10
Reynolds Number Re = d V /Vk 687032 Trashracks and intake loss (m) 0.02
Type of Flow Turbulent Total Head Loss htot individual (m) 4.94
Friction Factor f 0.0153 % of H.Loss of individual pipe 70,56% Ok
Expansion Joints (mm) 0.0E+00
EJ number 1 2 2 4 5
dL theoretical 0 0 0 0 0
dL recommended 0 0 0 0 0
dL for expansion 0 0 0 0 0
dL for contraction 0 0 0 0 0
Settling Basin Design
Referances: 2,4, 6,9,12,13,15,16 Date 23-Dec-2019
Project: Upper Jogmai SHP Location: Jogmai
Q flood 0.000 Sediment swelling factor S = 1.50

Manning's number M (m1/3/s) 1/n= 50.000 Volume of sediment storage V (m3) = 15.12
Design discharge Qdesign (m3/s) = 0.421 Sediment depth Hs (m) = V/Asi 0.63
Flushing discharge Q flush (m3/s) = 0.034 Inlet approach conveyance Canal/Pipe = Canal
Total discharge Qbasins (m3/s) = 0.455 1/Bottom slope of SB Sf (1:50 to 1:20) = 50.00
Particles to settle d (mm) = 0.300 Outlet approach conveyance Canal/Pipe = Pipe
Trapping efficiency n (%) = 85% Water level at inlet NWL (m) = 1950.00
water temperature t (oC) = 15 h flush below the base slab (L<6m) 1.70
Fall velocity w at 15 deg C (m/s) = 0.037 Number of basins N 1.00
Sediment concentration Cmax (kg/m3) = 2 Spillway crest height above NWL m 0.05
Flushing Frequency FI (hours) = 8 Spillway discharge coeff 1.60
Surface area / basin Asi (m2) 85 % = 24.000 Provided Freeboard h fb1 m 0.30
Basin transit velocity Vt (m/s) = 0.241 Discharge coeff for pipe as orifice (2.76 if L <6 m) 2.76
Bulk Sed density G (kg/m3) = 2600 Drawdown discharge % of design discharge 1.00
Discharge per basin Qbasin (m3/s) = 0.455 Water depth of inlet canal hc1 (m) = 0.50
Max section width for hydraulic flushing B (m) = 3.258 Outlet canal width /canal diameter Bc2 (m) = 0.50
Width used B (m) = 2.500 Water depth of outlet canal hc2 (m) = 0.30
Inlet canal width /canal diameter Bc1 (m) = 1.000 Provided Length of the basin Lact (m)= 0.00
Length of basin L (m) (Idel L = 9,6) = 10.000 Pipe does not need a straight approach! ***
Aspect ratio (4<=AR<=10) 4.000 Head over outlet weir h overtop (m) = 0.23
Min. water depth Hi (m) = 0.755 Approach inlet velocity vi1 (m/s) = 0.91
X-sectional area / basin Ai (m ) =
2
1.888 Approach outlet velocity vi2 (m/s) = 3.03
Wetted perimeter / basin Pi (m) = 4.010 1/Energy gradient during operation So = 15763.86
Hydraulic radius Ri (m) = 0.471 d 50 during operation (mm) = 0.33
Normal WL @ basin h b m = 1.385 Depth of water during flushing yfi (m) = #NAME?
Straight inlet transition length at 1:5 (m) = 3.750 d 50f during flushing (mm) = #NAME?
Straight approach canal length (m) = 10.000 Length of an Ideal Basin (m) = 10.00
Spilling of excess water

Vertical Flushing pipe
Diameter for flood d1 m = 0.000 Diameter for load rejection (u/s flood bypass) d1 m = 2 x 0,43
Spillway
Freeboard m 0.300 Spillway length for Qd (under operation) 0.00
Spillway overtopping height h overtop m 0.125 Spillway length for Qd (load rejection & u/s flood bypass) 6.43
Spillway length for Qf (flood and non operational) 0.000 Spillway length for Qd (d/s obstruction & full hovertop-50) 3.18
Combination of vertical flushing pipe and spillway Flood and non operational (Qf)
Vertical flushing pipe diameter d1 m 0.30 Flood discharge passing through vertical pipe 0.000
No of vertical flushing pipe 1.00 Spillway length for the remaining discharge m 1.00
Spillway length used (m) 1.00
Flood and Under Operation (Qf- Qd) Load Rejection (Qd)

H overtopping 0.00 H overtopping 0.262
Discharge passing through vertical pipe 0.00 Discharge passing through vertical pipe 0.240
Discharge passing over spillway 0.00 Discharge passing over spillway 0.215
Flushing of water and sediment

Flushing pipe and orifice diameter
Calculate Gate Rating Curves Gate Relative Discharge
d for incoming flow and draw down m 0.35 Opening Gate Openinig One basin
d for incoming flow only (empty state) m 0.40 Hg Hg/H1 Q
d for incoming flow only (empty state & with y flushing) m #NAME? 0.000 0.000 0.000
0.033 0.024 0.128
Gate 0.067 0.048 0.251
Buoyance weight of the gate W kgf 300.00 0.100 0.072 0.369
Gate Opening B, (m) 1.00 0.133 0.096 0.484
Gate Opening H (m) 0.50 0.167 0.120 0.597
Submerged area of th gate A m2 0.50 0.200 0.144 0.707
Water surface to cg of submerged area h m 1.14 0.233 0.168 0.816
Coeff of static friction mu 0.90 0.267 0.193 0.922
Lifting force F kgf 810.84 0.300 0.217 1.027
H. of water (H1) 1.39 0.333 0.241 1.129
0.367 0.265 1.230
1.800
Designed Cross Section 0.400 0.289 1.328
1.600 0.433 0.313 1.423
0.467 0.337 1.516
1.400 0.500 0.361 1.606
1.200
Forebay cum settling basin (one basin)
1.000
Penstock diameter m 0.41
Penstock velocity m/s 3.45
0.800 Submergence depth of penstock pipe m 0.91
Height of pipe above the base slab m 0.30
0.600 Min. pond depth m 1.62
Effective thickness of penstock mm 3
0.400
FS for air vent (5 burried, 10 exposed) 10
0.200
Young's modulus of elasticity E N/mm2 200000
Penstock inlet gate (Yes/No) No
0.000 Air vent diameter mm Nominal
Gradual Expansion of 1:5 half of Gr expansion
0.500
1.000 Width 2,5m Flushing cone/spillway O
Gradual Expansion 1 in 10 (1:2 for MHP) L =10

Spillway 0.300
0.500 Water depths 0,76m & 0,96m
Sediment depth 0,63m Slope 1:50
PENSTOCK AND POWER CALCULATIONS
Referances:2,4, 5,6,12,13,15,16 Date 23-Dec-2019
Project: Jhankre mini-hydropower Location:
Developer Himal Power Limited
Consultant BPC Hydroconsult
INPUT
General:
Project: Jogmai I
Location: Ilam Economic life (years) 10
Hydraulics:
Diversion flow Qd (m3/s) 0.450 WL @ forebay or U/S Invert Level (m) 1213.90
Flow in each pipe Qi (m3/s) 0.450 % head allowable headloss hlt (m) 16.00%
Gross head (from forebay) Hg (m) 180.00 Cumulative knowm efficiency (g,t,tr,others) 79.38%
Power:
Turbine type (CROSSFLOW/PELTON)
No of total jets (nj) & % closure
Pelton
1 10%
Valves (Sperical/Gate/Butterfly)
Taper (Yes/No) 0.3 0.3
No
Direct Coupling (Yes/No) Yes Exit (Yes/No) No
Closure time T sec 30.00 Non standard ult. tensile strength (UTS) N/mm2 0
Number of units 3
Penstock pipe:
Pipe Material (STEEL/HDPE/PVC) Steel Safety factor for lower pipes (0 for default)
Welded / Flat rolled if steel Welded Entrance Type 0.5
Rolled if steel Rolled Entrance with gate and air-vent (Yes/No) No
Type if steel (UNGRAGED/IS)
Burried or exposed
IS
Exposed
Bending radius (r/d) (1/2/3/5/1.5)
Bending angle 05
0.45 0.45
22.00
No of pipes 1.00 Bending angle 06 14.00
Bending angle 01(degrees) 2.00 Bending angle 07 0.00
Bending angle 02 11.00 Bending angle 08 0.00
Penstock diameter d=>d estd, d act (mm) 418 450 Pipe thickness t=>t min, t act (mm) 3.0 7.0
Pipe Length L (m) 550.000 Roughness coefficient (ks) 0.060
Trashrack
Design Submergence
Clear spacing, b Approach velocity, Angle of inclination, f Flow deviation, b discharge, Q depth @ trashrack,
Trashrack coefficient, kt thickness, t(mm) (mm) Vo (m/s) (deg) (deg) (m3/s) h (m)
2.40
Expansion Joints
2.40 6.00 20.00 1.00 71.56 0.00 0.450 0.70
Tmax (deg) T installation Tmin 1st Pipe length(m) 2nd Pipe L (m) 3rd Pipe L (m) 4th Pipe L (m) 5th Pipe L (m)
40 20 4 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 30.00
OUTPUT
Trashrack
Submergence @ Submergence @
Bend loss, hb trashrack width, penstock, h min penstock, h min
Frictional headloss, hf (m) (m) Headloss coeff Total headloss, H(m) Surface area, S (m2) B (m) (m) (m)
0.0233 0.0000 0.4572 0.0233 2.0555 2.79 1.84 0.61
Turbulent loss coefficients K Total 2.06

K inlet 0.50 K bend 05 0.24 K bend 10 0.00
K bend 01 0.18 K bend 06 0.22 K valve 0.30
K bend 02 0.21 K bend 07 0.00 K taper 0.00
K bend 03 0.19 K bend 08 0.00 K exit 0.00
K bend 04 0.21 K bend 09 0.00 K others 0.00
Hydraulics
Pipe Area A (m2) 0.159 U/S Invert Level (mAOD) 1213.90
Hydraulic Radius R (m) 0.11 D/S Invert Level (mAOD) 1033.90
Velocity V (m/s) 2.83 Is HLtot < HL available OKAY
Pipe Roughness ks (mm) 0.060 Friction Losses hf (m) 6.87
Relative Roughness ks/d 1.333E-04 Fitting Losses hfit (m) 0.84
Reynolds Number Re = d V /Vk 1116427 Trashracks and intake loss (m) 0.02
Type of Flow Turbulent Total Head Loss htot individual (m) 7.73
Friction Factor f 0.0138 % of H.Loss of individual pipe 4,3% Ok
Factor of Safety
Young's modulus of elasticity E N/mm2 200000 Ultimate tensile strength (UTS) N/mm2 410
Thickness 7.000 H total for 10% closure of one jet(m) 211.93
Diameter (mm) 450.000 t effective (mm) 4.30
Net Head (m) 172.268 Minimum t effictive for negative pressure (mm) 4.71
Wave Velocity a (m/s) 1107.341 Comment on thickness NA, No gate
Critical time Tc (sec) *2 = Closing time T 0,99 Ok Safety Factor (S) 3.70
Hsurge for 10% closure of one jet 31.92533 Check on Safety Factor Ok
Hsurge for one jet closure of Pelton(m) 319.253 Air vent diameter d vent (mm) 58.33
Hsurge for instanteneous closure of all unit closure of Pelton (m) 319.253 H total capacity of the specified pipe (m) 224.03
Lengths (max & actual) of the specified pipe (m) & Ok 581.415 550.000 H static capacity of the specified pipe (m) 192.10
Power
Turbine efficiency as per MGSP 75.00% Electrical Power as per MGSP GL (kW) 397.31
Available shaft power(kW) 570.36 Electrical Power based on Hnet (kW) 456.29
Reqd.'Turbine Capacity (+10%) (kW) 627.39 Power for known cumulative eff (kW) 603.67
Expansion Joints (mm) Coeff of linear expansion /deg C 1.2E-05

EJ number 1 2 2 4 5
dL theoretical 4 6 9 11 13
dL recommended 9 13 17 22 26
dL for expansion 5 7 10 12 14
dL for contraction 4 6 8 10 12
Forces on Anchor Block Block # & type 2 Convex
Small Hydropower Promotion Projec Spreadsheet by Mr Pushpa Chitrakar
Developer Kankaimai Hydropower P Ltd Designed Pushpa Chitrakar
Consultant EPC Consult Checked Pushpa Chitrakar
Input
Particulars Upstream Central Downstream Design Discharge, Q (m3/s) 0.37
Pipe dimensions Unit Weights (kN/m3)
Diameter (Di) 0.39 0.39 Mild Steel 78.5
Thickness 0.006 0.006 Water 9.81
Shaddle Spacing & number 4.00 7 4.00 RCC 25
Anchor Block 22
Elevations 818.000 Soil
Bearing capacity (kN/m 2) 200
Horizontal Distance (m) 2.000 53.712 f 30 0.5236
gs 20
Vertical angles, a & b (deg) 0.0000 27.7832
Location of Expansion Joint 2 2 Heads (m)

Forebay WL 835.000
D/S Expansion Joint : Yes Yes Tot.Transient Length (m) 511
Tpot Pipe Len (forebay to AB) 56.388
Output Total Surge Head 96.360
Weight of pipe, Wp (kN/m) 0.586 0.586 Static Head 17.000
Weight of water, Ww (kN/m) 1.172 1.172 Surge Head ± 10.63
Total weight, W (kN/m)) 1.758 1.758 Total (H) 27.633
Velocity, v (m/s) 3.097 3.097 Youngs Modulus of Elasticity (E) 2.1E+11
Vertical angles, a & b (rad) 0.000000 0.484908 Coefficient of Linear Expansion (a) 12E-06
GENERAL FORCES
1. Perpendicular component of Wt of pipe and water act perpendicular to the pipe CL along the anchor faces
F1=dead weight of half of anchor saddle pipe perp to pipe

3.516 3.516
F1u (kN)=wu*lmu/2*COS(a): F1d (kN)=wd*lmd/2*COS(b)
F1 perpendicular to pipe 3.516 3.110
F1 axial 0.000 -1.639
Fixed end moment = wl^2/8 for proped cantilever FEM.
FEMu (kN-m)= Restoring moment: FEMd (kN-m)= Overturning moment
FEM 2.344 -2.344
2. Axial frictional force of pipe on saddle supports transferred to anchor

F2 (kN)= ±m*w*L'*cos a 0.25
US Pipe Length, L' (m): 2.00
F2 (kN) = ± 12.305 +ve for expansion
3. Hydrostatic Pressure at Bend due to the vector difference of static pressure & acting towards IP
Pu (kN) = F3u =PI/4*dui^2*Ht*g 32.38
Pd (kN) = F3d =PI/4*ddi^2*Ht*g 32.38
F3 = 2*P*sin((b-a)/2) 15.549
4. Component of weight of pipe (wp) along the pipe

F4u= wp*active arm L’*sin(a) F4d= wp*active arm L’*sin(b)
F4 0.000 0.546
5. Thermally (expansion/contraction) induced axial force ( if no EJ provided)

F5 (kN)=pi()*D mean*t*E*a*Dt + Expansion, - Contraction
Condition Tmax Tinstallation Tmin
Temp at oC 40 20 4
F5 expansion 0.000 0.000
F5 contraction 0.000 0.000
6. Axial friction within Expansion joint seal due to the movement against the circumferential pressure
F6=±PI()*D*W*H*g*m + Expansion, - Contraction W
m for rubber packing 0.25 Seal width, W (m) 0.16

Static Pressure at Exp, Ps (m) 17.000 17.93
F6
F6 F6
Dynamic Pressure at Exp, Pd (m) 10.256 11.06
Pipe Movement
Total (AH) 27.256 28.992
F6 (kN) =± 13.507 13.939 p
7. Axial hydrostatic pressure on exposed end of pipe in Expansion Joint

F7=PI*D*t*H*g
F7 1.996 2.059 F7 p F7
8. Dynamic pressure at the bend due to the vector difference of momentum

F8 = 2.5*(Q^2/d^2)*sin((b-a)/2) P8= mV =Q*r*Vi
P8 (kN) 1.146 1.146
F8 0.540
9. Axial (small diameter) force on Reducer

F9=PI()*(D upi^2-Ddni^2)/4*g*H
Reducer: No No
Location & Diameter: 3.00 0.40 4.00 0.40
St. Head 17.00 18.86
Dyn. Head 10.63 10.98
F9 (kN) 0.000 0.000
10 Axial drag of flowing Water (friction of flowing water) (not considered in MHP)
F10=g*PI()*D upi^2/4*DH(Exp to block)
F10 (kN) 0.000 No 0.000 No
11 Axial (u/s slope) force due to soil pressure upstream of the block
F11 =gs*hs^2/2*cos f*ka*B F11
ka= (cosi-sqrt(cosi^2-cosf^2))/(cosi+sqrt(cosi^2-cosf^2)) 0.333 Width, B(m) 2
hs = soil depth = hu 1.8
F11 21.600 Yes @ 1/3 of hs 0.6
12 Vertical force due to the weight of the block

F12 =gblock*Vol of block
Vol of block 16.191
F12 356.202 Yes F 12
SUMMARY OF CRITICAL FORCES Expansion Contraction

@ bend Total @ bend Total
1 Summation of total horizontal forces SH (kN) 16.551 38.151 -10.41 11.19
2 Summation of total vertical forces SV (kN) -16.554 339.648 -3.56 352.64
3 Summation of total moment forces SM (kN-m) 0.000 0.00
Anchor Block Stability
Small Hydropower Promotion Projec Spreadsheet by Mr Pushpa Chitrakar
Developer Mansarawar Hydropower P Ltd
Consultant EHS
Input Output
Anchor
Upstream depth, Hu (m) 3.3 Concrete volume of Anchor Block 16.191
Downstream depth, Hd (m) 2.25 Weight of block, Wb (kN) 356.199
Width, W (m) 2 Centre of gravity XX 1.405
Length, L (m) 3
3.5
g anchor (kN/m3) 22 Anchor Block Section
m 0.5 3.0
Height Y (m) '

2.5
Penstock 2.0
Bend at (X), (m) 1
1.5
Bend at (Y), (m) 2.15
1.0
Diameter, d (m) 0.458
Upstream angle, a (deg) 13 0.5
Length X (m) '
Upstream angle, b (deg) 25 0.0
-0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0
Foundation
Upstream depth hfu (m) 1.8 Active earth pressure coeff, Ka 0.3715
Soil friction f, (deg) 30 F Pa Fx Fy
g soil (kN/m3) 20 Soil force 23.455 22.853 5.276
Bearing Capacity, SBC (kN/m2) 200 Acting at (m) 0.6
Forces (with soil pressure and block weight)

Forces with earthpressure & anchor Yes Overturning Bearing Sliding
Net Forces @
Expansion bend SM @ O 563.303 P max 72.68097 172.63
SH (kN) 53.180 30.327 d 1.632 P min 42.4057 Ok
SV (kN) 345.260 -16.215 eccentricity e, Ok 0.132 Ok
e allowable 0.500
Contraction SM @ O 473.281 P max 55.8664 160.22

SH (kN) 16.66 -6.19 d 1.477 P min 50.94693 Ok
SV (kN) 320.44 -41.03 eccentricity e, Ok 0.023 Ok
Turbine Selection
SMALL HYDROPOWER PROMOTION PROJECT/Revision 2006.05
Project Upper Jogmai SHP
Input
Discharge (l/s) 150 Gear ratio at turbine 1
Gross head (m) 69 Gear ratio at generator 2
Hydraulic losses 15.94% No of turbines/generators 1
Max turbine output kW 67.89 Total number of jets if Pelton n 2
Turbine rpm 750 Specified turbine Pelton
Cd 0.96 Cu 0.46
Output
Net head m 58.001 Generator with gearing rpm 1500
No Gearing With Gearing

Sp speed of runner rpm (no gearing) 46 Sp speed of turbine 23
Pelton (12-30) => (Ns 17-42) ** Pelton (12-30) => (Ns 17-42) Pelton
Turgo (Ns 20-70) => (Ns 28-99) Turgo Turgo (Ns 20-70) => (Ns 28-99) **
Crossflow (Ns 20-80) Crossflow Crossflow (Ns 20-80) Crossflow
Fracis (Ns 80-400) ** Fracis (Ns 80-400) **
Propeller or Kaplan (Ns 340-1000) ** Propeller or Kaplan (Ns 340-1000) **
Jet velocity Vj (m/s) 32.38

Nozzle diameter, Dn (mm) 54.85
Pitch circle diameter, PCD (mm) 395.15
Selection of Electrical Equipment
Referances: 6,7,8,12,13 23-Dec-2019
Date
SMALL HYDROPOWER PROMOTION PROJECT/GRevision 2006.05
Project Upper Jogmai SHP
INPUT
Discharge (m3/s) 0.08 Power factor 0.8
Gross head (m) 50.968 Safety factor of generator 1.3
Overall plant efficiency (%) 50% Phase 1
Temperature (oC) 45 Type of Generator 2 2
Altitude (m) 1500 Over rating factor of MCCB 1.25
ELC correction factor 0.83 Over rating factor of cable 1.5
Frequency of the system (Hz) 50 No. of poles 4
Capacity of used generator (kW) 0 Rated rotor speed if induction generator N (rpm) 1450
Capacitor configuration Delta Efficiency of motor at full load 89%
OUTPUT
Pe Electrical output (active power) (kW) 20.00 Use of 3-phase generator is mandatory
Generator
Temp.factor 0.96 Altitude factor 0.96
Capacity (kW) 28.25 Actual available capacity (kW) 30.00
Synchronous rotational speed Ns (rpm) 1500 Rotational speed of the generator (rpm) 1550
IGC capacity (kW) 20.00 Calculated Ballast capacity 1.2*Pe (kW) 24.00
Excitation Capacitance (micro F) 123.16
Rated Voltage (V) 220 Irated for Cable & MCCB (A) at Generator side 170.45
Rating of MCCB (A) 113.64 Calculated size of MCCB (A) 142.04
Cable
Rating (A) 255.68 Size of 2-core cupper armoured cables 150
Turbine and Generator Machine Foundation
Project Upper Jogmai, Ilam
Machine Foundation Plan

Height ZZ (m)
Machine Foundation Section

1.8 2.8
2.6
1.6 2.4
YY (m)
1.4 2.2
2.0
1.2 1.8
1.6
1.0
1.4
0.8 1.2
1.0
0.6 0.8
0.6
0.4
0.4
0.2 0.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.2
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
2.2
3.0
3.2
3.4
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
2.4
2.6
2.8
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.8
2.0
2.2
2.8
3.0
3.2
3.4
0.6
1.6
2.4
2.6
XX (m)
XX (m)
INPUT
Gross head hg (m) 51.00 Design Discharge Qd (m3/s) 0.150
Surge head hs (m) 50.00
Foundation Penstock
Foundation on Soil Diameter dp (m) 0.300
Allowable bearing capacity Pall (kN/m2) 180 Material mild steel
Friction coeff between block and soil m 0.5 Centreline above PH floor hp (m) 0.300
Length L (m) 3.2 Turbine Pit
Bredth B (m) 2.5 Length of opening Lo (m) 0.450
Height H (m) 1.5 Bredth of opening Bo (m) 0.500
Material of foundation Concrete Height of opening Ho (m) 1.000
Density of foundation (kM/m3) 22 Height of tailrace canal Htr (m) 0.500
Electro-mechanical XX (m) YY (m)

Weight of turbine Wt (kN) & cl position 2.943 0.625 1.250
Weight of generator Wg (kN) & cl position 3.434 2.025 1.250
OUTPUT
Weight Wi Lever Arm LA (m)
Forces (kN) LA along XX LA along YY
Force due to h total of 101 m, Fh (kN) 70.036 1.800
Foundation
W1 33.000 3.000 1.25
W2 27.225 2.575 1.25
W3 193.875 1.175 1.25
Sum of moments SM (kN-m) 282.455 199.530
Sum of vertical forces SM (kN) 260.477 260.477
Overturning
Equivalent distance at which SM acts from critical point LA along XX LA along YY
d (m) 1.084 0.766
Eccentricity e, (m) 0.516 0.484
Allowable eccentricity e all (m) 0.533 0.417
Comment on overturning moment Ok Not Ok
Bearing
Pressure at base LA along XX LA along YY
Pmax 64.038 70.379
Pmin 1.081 -5.260
Comments on bearing Ok Not Ok
Sliding
LA along XX LA along YY
Factor of safety against sliding, FS sl 1.860 1.860
Comment of sliding Ok Ok
Transmission and Distribution System:

Referances:2,4, 6,12,13,15,16 Date 23-Dec-2019
Project: Upper Jogmai SHP Power factor 0.8 Cable Summary
Developer Kankaimai Hydropower P Ltd Voltage systems 11000 Type Length(km)
Consultant EPC Consult 400 Squirrel 4.50
Designed Pushpa Chitrakar 230 Gopher 0.00
Checked Pushpa Chitrakar Weasel 10.00
Rabbit 3.00
Otter 1.15
Dog 5.30
Total Cost(R 606600.00
Length of neutral cables (km)
Reach Power at
Load
Reach Length Phase next node ACSR Momentum V @ prev Reach Voltage V @ next S% voltage
Node name name (km) 1,3,11 (kW) type (kW-m) node (V) Current (A) drop (V) node (V) drop
PH-A-B-C-D 3 400.00 400.00

PH A PHA 0.300 3 16 Dog 4800 400.00 28.87 6.30 393.70 1.58
A B AB 0.500 1 5 Rabbit 2500 227.30 27.50 17.60 209.70 8.82
C AC 0.500 1 5 Rabbit 2500 227.30 27.50 17.60 209.70 8.82
D AD 0.500 1 5 Rabbit 2500 227.30 27.50 17.60 209.70 8.82
PH-T1 3 400.00 400.00

PH T1 PHT1 0.050 3 21 Otter 1050 400.00 37.89 1.60 398.40 0.40
T1-T2 11 11000.00 11000.00

T1 T2 T1 T2 1.500 11 21 Squirrel 31500 11000.00 1.38 5.00 10995.00 0.05
T2-E 3 400.00 400.00

T2 E T2 E 0.300 3 21 Dog 6300 400.00 37.89 8.20 391.80 2.05
E-J ( r ) 1 226.21 226.21

E J EJ 0.500 1 7 Dog 3500 226.21 38.68 16.20 210.01 8.69
E-H (y) 1 226.21 226.21

E G EG 0.500 1 7 Otter 3500 226.21 38.68 18.40 207.81 9.65
G H GH 0.200 1 3 Dog 600 207.81 18.05 3.00 204.81 10.95
E-M (b) 1 226.21 226.21

E K EK 0.500 1 7 Dog 3500 226.21 38.68 16.20 210.01 8.69
K L KL 0.200 1 3 Dog 600 210.01 17.86 3.00 207.01 10.00
L M LM 0.200 1 2 Dog 400 207.01 12.08 2.00 205.01 10.87
LOADS AND BENEFITS
Referances: 1,2,3,4, 6,12,13,15,16 Date 23-Dec-2019
Project: Gaddi Gad Khola Location: Ladagada VDC, Doti
Developer Gaddi Gad Khola MHP
Consultant Perinial
INPUT
General
Power Output (kW) 96.1 Domestic lighting
Name of the Source Gaddi Gad Khola Average subscription/household (W/HH) 85
System loss 10%
Beneficiary HH (nos.) 471 time 0 5 8 18 20
Plant's operating days 330 load 88 0 0 91.1 0
440 0 0 182.2
Loads (kWh or W/m) Operating dTariff (Rs) Probable Business Load Expected after 3 years
Domestic 330 1.00 Operating d/y Tariff (Rs) Load From (hr) To (hr)
Agro-processing 330 6.00 Metal Workshop 330 6.00 10 12 16
Bakery 320 6.00 Photo Studio 320 6.00 1 8 20
Saw Mill 300 5.00 Dairy Processing 320 6.00 8 8 18
Herbs Processing 180 5.50 Cold Store 310 6.00 6 8 18
Load 5 330 Load 5
Load 6 330 Load 6
Proposed end uses and operting hours

time (hr) 0 4 12 16 22 Daily Energy Demand (Dd) kWh 1037
Agro-processing 0 0 22.5 0 0 Yearly Energy Demand (Dy) kWh 378578
time (hr) 0 8 14 18 22 Average Load Factor 49.97%
Bakery 0 9 0 0 0
time (hr) 0 3 16 18 22
Saw Mill 0 0 10 0 0
time (hr) 0 3 12 17 22
Herbs Processing 0 0 25 0 0
time (hr) 0 6 8 15 22
Load 5 15 0 0 0 0
time (hr) 0 3 5 10 22
Load 6 12 0 0 0 0
36 0 0 0 0 36.00
OUTPUT
Summary
Annual Available kWh 761112
First 3 years After 3 years
Yearly end use load (kWh) 117060 147680
Productive end use load factor (%) 15.38 19.40
Total load plant factor 42.36 50.40
Annual total (domestic + end uses) Income (Rs) 916,050 1,099,770
End Use Load Operation Period Yearly Load Annual Income

(kW) Hours/day Days/year kWh LF (%) (Rs)
Domestic Lighting 44.483 13.987 330 205326 26.98 480,420
Existing/Committed Business Load
Agro-processing 22.5 4 330 29700 3.90 178200
Bakery 9 6 320 17280 2.27 103680
Saw Mill 10 2 300 6000 0.79 30000
Herbs Processing 25 5 180 22500 2.96 123750
Load 5 15 6 330 29700 3.90 0
Load 6 12 3 330 11880 1.56 0
Total 117060 15.38 435,630
Total Annual Income from sales of electricity 916,050
Probable Business Load after 3 years

Metal Workshop 10 4 330 13200 1.73 79200
Photo Studio 1 12 320 3840 0.50 23040
Dairy Processing 8 10 320 25600 3.36 153600
Cold Store 6 10 310 18600 2.44 111600
Load 5 0 0 0 0 0.00 0
Load 6 0 0 0 0 0.00 0
Total additional annual income after 3 years 61240 8.05 183,720
In s t a lle d C a p a c it y & L o a d ( k W )
Productive End Use (%) 19.40

Load Duration Chart for the first three years of operation of Gaddi Gad Khola
Load Duration Chart for the first three years of operation of Gaddi Gad Khola
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
140
120
100 Load 6
Load 5
80 Herbs Proc es sing
Saw Mill
60 Bakery
Agro-proc es sing
40 Domest ic
Ins talled Capac ity
20
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
Time (h rs)
Project Costing and Financial Analyses
Referances: 1,2,3,4, 6,7,8,12,13 Date 23-Dec-2019
INPUT
Project size (kW): 96.10
Total Project Cost (Rs.) 12,734,865
Headrace Canal
Subsidy/kW Total subsidy Bank loan Other loan Cash equity Kind equity Others
91500 Rs/kW x 96,1 = 8793150 1,890,044 1,200,000 851,671 0
Interest rate i (%) 3%
Payback period n (yr) 7
Plant life N (yr) 15
Discount Rate I (%) 4%
O & M (Rs) 305,004
Investment Cost (Rs) 8,516,715 Salary 114000
Mechanical components 999,040 Installation 232,500 Spares 0
Electrical component 2,061,717 Commissioning 0 Maintenance 171,000
Civil component 1,363,497 VAT 623,611 Office expenses
Spare parts & tools 57,550 Contingencies 0 Miscellaneous 20,004
Transport. 3,178,800 Others Others
Cost Summary NPV Based on Different Project Costs

Project cost (Rs) 12,734,865 NPV Probable Business Load
Annual Operation, Maintenance and other Costs (Rs) 305,004 Without With
Annual Income without probable business loads (Rs) 916050 Total investment cost (3,543,677) (2,010,846)
Annual Income with probable business loads (Rs) 1099770 Total Inv Cost-Subsidy 5,249,473 6,782,304
Annual installment for Bank loan 303364 Equity 3,773,038 5,305,869
Annual installment for other loan NA
NPV on equity without probable business load (Rs)+ve 3,773,038
NPV equity with probable business load (Rs)+ve 5,305,869
Cost/Kw =>>Ok 132,517
Subsidy/HH 18,669
Annual Cash Flows

Without Probable Business Loads With Probable Business Loads
Year Equity O & M costs Loan repayment Income Cash flow Income Cash flow
0 1,200,000 -1,200,000 -1,200,000
1 305,004 303,364 916,050 307,682 916,050 307,682
2 305,004 303,364 916,050 307,682 916,050 307,682
3 305,004 303,364 916,050 307,682 916,050 307,682
4 305,004 303,364 916,050 307,682 1,099,770 491,402
5 305,004 303,364 916,050 307,682 1,099,770 491,402
6 305,004 303,364 916,050 307,682 1,099,770 491,402
7 305,004 303,364 916,050 307,682 1,099,770 491,402
8 305,004 0 916,050 611,046 1,099,770 794,766
9 305,004 0 916,050 611,046 1,099,770 794,766
10 305,004 0 916,050 611,046 1,099,770 794,766
11 305,004 0 916,050 611,046 1,099,770 794,766
12 305,004 0 916,050 611,046 1,099,770 794,766
13 305,004 0 916,050 611,046 1,099,770 794,766
14 305,004 0 916,050 611,046 1,099,770 794,766
15 305,004 0 916,050 611,046 1,099,770 794,766
Ulitilities and Short Calculations
Uniform Depth of a Trapezoidal Canal (Y-m)
Golmagad SHP Date 23-Dec-2019
Stone masonry canal Revision 2006.05
Design Discharge (l/s): 1,000

1/Mannings Coeff (M): 50.0000
1/Canal Slope (S): 300
Freeboard, FB (m) 0.2
Wall Thickness, t (m) 0.3
Width of Canal, b (m): 1.000
Z= 0.50 Z= 0.50
Top width, T (m) #NAME?
Uniform Depth (Y-m) #NAME?
Canal Wall Geometry

Payment of a loan
Payback 1
Loan amount (NRs) : 1,800,000 Starting Month 2
Interest rate (APR): 13.00% Starting Year 2006
Yearly payment and No 10
Yearly Payment 331,721.20

Actual vs AEPC Power (Pe-kW)
Discharge (l/s): 120

Cumulative efficiency including head loss (n%) 80.00%
Gross Head (H-m) 300.00
Actual Power (Pact-kW) 282.53
Power MGSP-ESAP (Pe-kW) 176.58
Spillway Lengths (m)
Flood discharge (l/s): 2,000

Design discharge (l/s): 500
Overtopping height (ho) mm: 300
Spillway discharge coeff 1.5
L spillway min for Qf m & full height 0.00
Length of spillway Ls1 for Qf m & half height 0.00
Friction Factor (f) & Net head
Discharge (m3/s) 0.500 Flow

Gross head (m) 63 Velocity, v(m/s) 2.5464790895
Pipe roughness ks (mm) 0.010 Reynold's nr, (R ) 1116876.79362734
Pipe diameter (mm) 500.00 Laminar Flow 5.73026500014778E-05
Pipe Length (m) 100 9.170E+00
Turbulent headloss factor (K) 1.50 9.170E+00
Friction factor f 0.0119 Transitional Flow & 0.0118931351
Headloss hl (m) 1.282
Headloss hl (%) 2.03
Net Head (m) 61.718
Voltage Drop

Reach length, L (km) 1.000

Voltage at 1st node, V1 (V) 230
Power, P (kW) 20
ASCR type 6.00
Phase at 1st node, f1 (1/3) 1
Phase at 2nd node, f2 (1/3) 1
Current, I (A) 108.70
Impedence, Z (Ω/km) 0.4178
Voltage at 2nd node, V2 (V) 139.17
Power loss P loss (kW) 3.95
Voltage drop, dV (V) 90.83
% Voltage drop 39.49
List of References
1 Mini-Grid Support Programme, Alternative Energy Promotion Centre, Kathmandu, Nepal
(2002), Peltric Standards
2 Mini-Grid Support Programme, Alternative Energy Promotion Centre, Kathmandu, Nepal

(2003), Preliminary Feasibility Studies of Prospective Micro-hydro Projects
3 Mini-Grid Support Programme, Alternative Energy Promotion Centre , Kathmandu,

Nepal(2001), Technical Details and Cost Estimate
4 Mini-Grid Support Programme, Alternative Energy Promotion Centre , Kathmandu,

Nepal(2003), Guidelines for Detailed Feasibility Study of Micro-Hydro Projects
5 European Small Hydropower Association (1998), Layman's Guidebook on How to Develop a

Small Hydro Site
6 BPC Hydroconsult, Intermediate Technology Development Group (ITDG), Kathmandu, Nepal

(2002), Civil Works Guidelines for Micro-Hydropower in Nepal.
7 United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO), Report on Standardiztion of

Civil Works for Small Hydropower Plants
8 GTZ/Department of Energy Development, Energy Division, Papua New Guinea, Micro

Hydropower Training Modules (1994), Modules 1-7, 10, 13, 14 & 18B.
9 Americal Society of Civil Engineer (ASCE), Sediment Transportation.
10 KB Raina & SK Bhattacharya, New Age International (P) Ltd (1999), Electrical Design
Estimating and Costing.
11 Badri Ram & DN Vishwakarma, Tata McGraw-Hill Publishing Company Limited, New Delhi
(1995), Power System Protection and Switchgear.
12 Adam Harvey et.al. (1993), Micro-Hydro Design Manual, A guide to small-scale water power
schemes, Intermediate Technology Publications, ISBN 1 85339 103 4.
13 Allen R. Inversin (1986), Micro-Hydropower Sourcebook, A Practical Guide to Design and

Implementation in Developing Countries, NRECA International Foundation, 1800
Massachusetts Avenue N. W., Washington, DC 20036.
14 Helmut Lauterjung/Gangolf Schmidt (1989), Planning of Intake Structures, GATE/GTZ,

Vieweg.
15 Methodologies for estimating hydrologic characteristics of ungauged locations in Nepal

(1990), HMG of Nepal, Ministry of Water Resources, Water and Energy Commission
Secretariat, Department of Hydrology and Meteorology.
16 Design Manuals for Irrigation Projects in Nepal (1990), Planning and Design Strengthening
Project (PDSP), His Majesty's Government of Nepal, Ministry of Water Resources,
Department of Irrigation. United Nations Development Programme (NEP/85/013)/World
Bank.
17 Salleri Chialsa Small Hydel Project (1983), Technical Report, DEH/SATA, ITECO.
18 P.N. Khanna (1996), Indian Practical Civil Engineer's Handbook, 15th Edition, Engineer's
Publishers, Post Box 725, New Delhi - 110001.

En Micro Hydro Design Aids GIZ 2005

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

En Micro Hydro Design Aids GIZ 2005

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

MICROHYDRO DESIGN AIDS © 2010 for Microsoft Excel 2003

Small Hydropower Promotion Project (SHPP)/GTZ

By Mr. Pushpa Chitrakar

Worksheets Collaboration Partmers

Salt Const. (k) 1.8000

Discharge Measurement by Conductivity Meter: Golmagad SHP

December #NAME? #NAME? Q exceedence (month) 12 12

4.0 Weir Section & Forces @ Normal Condition

Foundation and Soil

Water (flood conditions)

Summantion forces Normal Flood

Overturning: Equivalent distance at which SM acts from critical point

Gravel Flushing Gate h

Gravel trap (if needed)

Orifice Calculations for (B = 2H or provided) rectangular canal downstream of orifice

River Width flood (Brf) m = 20

Head/Critical Depth of u/s water (ho)m = 0.226 vo flood m/s = 4

Trashrack gradient (b) deg = 36 Trashrack clearance (a) mm = 30

kappa (c) = 0.749 h d/s normal (m) 0.000

3100 0 Canal =890,65 0

Bottom Intake Weir Geometry

500 0 3119.3444 500 1300 2048.2735 3728 3119.3444 500 3119.3444 0

Economic life (years) 15

Turbulent loss coefficients

Q flood 0.000 Sediment swelling factor S = 1.50

Spilling of excess water

Flood and Under Operation (Qf- Qd) Load Rejection (Qd)

Flushing of water and sediment

Gradual Expansion 1 in 10 (1:2 for MHP) L =10

Turbulent loss coefficients K Total 2.06

Expansion Joints (mm) Coeff of linear expansion /deg C 1.2E-05

Location of Expansion Joint 2 2 Heads (m)

F1=dead weight of half of anchor saddle pipe perp to pipe

2. Axial frictional force of pipe on saddle supports transferred to anchor

4. Component of weight of pipe (wp) along the pipe

5. Thermally (expansion/contraction) induced axial force ( if no EJ provided)

m for rubber packing 0.25 Seal width, W (m) 0.16

7. Axial hydrostatic pressure on exposed end of pipe in Expansion Joint

8. Dynamic pressure at the bend due to the vector difference of momentum

9. Axial (small diameter) force on Reducer

12 Vertical force due to the weight of the block

SUMMARY OF CRITICAL FORCES Expansion Contraction

Height Y (m) '

Forces (with soil pressure and block weight)

Contraction SM @ O 473.281 P max 55.8664 160.22

No Gearing With Gearing

Jet velocity Vj (m/s) 32.38

Rating of MCCB (A) 113.64 Calculated size of MCCB (A) 142.04

Machine Foundation Plan

Machine Foundation Section

Electro-mechanical XX (m) YY (m)

Small Hydropower Promotion Project (SHPP)/GTZ Spreadsheet by Mr Pushpa Chitrakar

PH-A-B-C-D 3 400.00 400.00

PH-T1 3 400.00 400.00

T1-T2 11 11000.00 11000.00

T2-E 3 400.00 400.00

E-J ( r ) 1 226.21 226.21

E-H (y) 1 226.21 226.21

E-M (b) 1 226.21 226.21

Proposed end uses and operting hours

End Use Load Operation Period Yearly Load Annual Income

Probable Business Load after 3 years

Productive End Use (%) 19.40