Professional Documents
Culture Documents
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES
E-mail: rd@bar.gov.ph website: www.bar.gov.ph
DIRECTED RESEARCH
BIODIVERSITY AND HABITAT MONITORING
Project Terms of Reference
In response to Republic Act No. 9729 or the Climate Change Act of 2009, BAR crafted
the Climate Change Research, Development and Extension Agenda and
Program (CC RDEAP) for Agriculture and Fisheries in 2011-2016. This is in
recognition of the need to address the challenges and threats of climate change to
agricultural productivity and consequently to the food and livelihood opportunities of
Filipinos. The CC RDEAP is a result of a series of consultations, meetings and
workshops with various stakeholders from the agriculture and fisheries sectors.
The agenda follows the policy thrust of the “Philippine Adaptation and Mitigation in
Agriculture Knowledge Toolbox” which is one of the seven DA Systems-Wide Climate
Change Program. The program aims to inventory, generate and disseminate adaptive
tools, technologies, and practices that users can access and use through the
extension services of the country. Research, on the other hand, hopes to pursue new
tools and knowledge in partnership with the scientific community. The program has
two pillars – mitigation and adaptation. Adaptation serves as the anchor strategy and
mitigation measures come as a function of adaptation.
In 2015, the CC RDEAP was updated to accommodate the next medium-term plan
covering CY 2016-2022. The document covers three main sub-sectors namely:
Crops, Poultry & Livestock and Fisheries & Aquaculture. As in the past updating
underwent rigorous and widespread consultations to maximize stakeholder
participation. The researchable areas per sub-sector were anchored on specific
problems concerning each element in the value chain thus producing a more
comprehensive and responsive research agenda.
Finally, in 2017, the CC RDEAP 2016-2022 was assessed vis-à-vis the BAR funded
projects under the Climate Change Program. Research gaps per subsector were
identified and eventually prioritized. This call for proposal hopes to generate specific
proposals on each of the prioritized research area to ensure the objectives of the CC-
RDEAP are achieved and major research gaps are addressed.
Fisheries resources and its environs are becoming increasingly fragile due to
pressures of increasing population and demand for multiple use. Climate change and
climate variability effects further worsen these scenarios. Biodiversity inventory and
habitat monitoring – seeing what is there, assessing what condition it is in, and tracking
how that is changing – is therefore critical for taking stock of progress, learning and
improving practices, and showing how critical fisheries resources can be spent most
effectively.
Historically, much of the biodiversity monitoring has been done at the local level to
meet specific local needs. A more nationally-consistent, systematic and
comprehensive approach means the information collected can be built into a national
framework and used in multiple ways. The proposed project should therefore be able
to answer the following questions:
a) How does climate change affect the hydrology, ecological character and
fisheries livelihood opportunities in multi-functional landscapes?
c) What tradeoffs between fish production and other uses in these landscapes
need to be considered to optimize contributions to livelihood, food security and
resilience while maintaining long term ecological stability?
The proposed monitoring system should show what works best, and can be used to
improve future management effectiveness. It should also provide locally relevant
information to share with the vulnerable communities. Proponents can submit more
than one proposal but not to exceed three proposals per researchable area.
IV. DURATION
1
In the event that more than one proposal is received, each proposal will be assessed and rated using the
criteria specified. Detailed scoring (BOTH TECHNICAL AND FINANCIAL will be developed by BAR and announced
immediately.
5. Cost Efficiency: Working on the principle of value for money, the proposal must
be able to justify the requested amount/cost of project implementation vis-à-viz
the quality and nature of new knowledge to be generated in addition to the
usefulness of these information to addressing climate change issues affecting
the agriculture and fisheries sub-sectors. (30%)
4. Project team must be directly affiliated with the proposing institution and must
meet the required expertise for the project.
5. Both the institution and the project team must have excellent track record on
both the technical and financial aspects of project management. List of similar
projects conducted should be submitted with the proposal.
2
Provided it is registered with PHILGEPS and accredited by the Department of Agriculture.
3
Proponent must submit proof of this.
1. Executive Summary
The proposal must be able to clearly specify how the project will contribute to
mainstreaming climate change concerns across the various R&D programs,
projects and activities supported by BAR. Please refer to the 10-point
guideposts (Annex 2). This will help prioritize the Climate Change R&D
proposals received and identify whether the proposal contributes to efforts
addressing climate change and/or variability effects among others.
4
Please refer to relevant annexes on the required attachments
Proponents should also attach the following documents to help BAR to assess
and rate the institutional and personnel capacity of the proponents.
Specify the distinct roles and responsibilities of the project lead, project
team and partner agencies to the research initiative. R&D components
and expertise may be indicated to delineate functions. Please use the
position description form (Annex 3).
The proposal must be endorsed by the proponent’s agency head. The letter should
be addressed to the Director of the Bureau of Agricultural Research through the
Regional Executive Director. Please note that only proposals endorsed by the DA
Regional Executive Director will proceed to the final review and assessment by BAR.
1. Progress Reports
The Semi-annual Progress Report shall contain the activities conducted within
the period covered (6 months) and should be submitted within thirty (30) days
after the period covered has ended.
The Annual Report shall contain the major accomplishments and/or findings for
the year in accordance to the approved logical framework for review and
evaluation of the BAR Evaluation Team.
2. Financial Report
A semi-annual report on the status of fund utilization duly signed by the Agency
Accountant within thirty (30) days after the end of the 2nd quarter of project
implementation. An annual financial report signed by the Accountant and
verified by a COA Representative shall also be submitted within sixty (60) days
after project completion.
3. Completion Report
At the end of the project, six (6) copies of the project terminal/completion report
(Annex 5) properly endorsed by the Agency Head shall be submitted for review
and final acceptance by the BAR Evaluation Team. Final payment can only be
made once the report is revised and duly accepted by BAR to address
comments, if any.
The proponent shall also submit a brief write-up in a publishable form of the
project summarizing major accomplishments and significant results as well as
policy implications.
4. Periodic Reviews
DA-BAR shall schedule periodic reviews to assess the progress of the funded
projects based on its objectives and approved workplan schedule.
X. CONTACT INFORMATION
For clarifications and additional inquiries regarding the proposal, the proponents can
contact the following BAR-Climate Change focal persons under the Program
Development Division (PDD):
The Timelines must be consistent with the logical framework and are negotiable during
the scoping meeting with BAR prior to final approval and MOA signing.
Release of funds
Project implementation