www.michelangelo.

cn

MY CRITERIA?

Some scholars have commented my work by saying that symbols of the Mother Goddess have been found everywhere in the world. It is
true: I have hundreds of other images of Mother Goddesses in my computer, BUT THEY ARE NOT HUNGARIAN MOTHER ISTENS. They
do not comply with the criteria I have used to compile my tables:
A design can be tagged Hungarian only if it was used, for at least 3000 years, in Pannonia, Arsia and/or Pazyrykia, and in Magyaria. A
design can be tagged Hungarian if it belonged to a town, a cemetery or a culture where the majority of the artefacts shows also other
Hungarian sacred symbols and art designs. A single design is not enough to identify a culture! (See the Indo-European battle axe!)
Furthermore, the towns, cultures and cemeteries should have already been listed among the places supposed to have been Hungarian in
the book “Honfoglalás…”, because they shared other cultural markers of the Hungarian civilization. (I have only added the Tagar culture, in
the last book).
The archaeological artefacts must not be technological innovations because technological innovations do not need migrations of populations
in order to spread, but trade and or cultural diffusion. Religion instead, in most cases needs demic diffusion and often it does not even
suffice: the Amerindians did not become Catholic further to demic diffusion, but simply because they, who did not convert, were
“terminated”.
Examples of Mother Goddesses, which could not comply with the above criteria:

Ordosh, 4 arms Isten South East China Gan Su, CN ICASS homepage, CN Beduin

B. Spears delivery, sculptur

Africa Australia Caribe Amerindian

A few could comply, but further research would be needed; some of them could be enrolled by Obrusánszky Borbála as Hunnish; most of
them are linked to a long period of time, which predates the emergence of the Arya-Semite-Mongols - the Gold Age, the time when the
Titans ruled over mankind.