Professional Documents
Culture Documents
TABLE OF CONTENT
TABLE OF CONTENT....................................................................................................................... 2
ABBREVIATION ............................................................................................................................... 7
FOREWORD ..................................................................................................................................... 12
INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................. 14
1.SENSITAZATION ......................................................................................................................... 16
1.1. TRAININGS OF DIFFERENT CATEGORIES OF CITIZENS ............................................... 16
1.1.1. Training on preventing and fighting injustice, corruption and other related offenses ............. 16
1.1.2. Training on the law on leadership code of conduct and access to information ....................... 20
1.2. DELIVERING MESSAGE TROUGH MASS MEDIA ............................................................. 22
CONCLUSION ................................................................................................................................. 84
REQUEST ......................................................................................................................................... 86
ANNEXES......................................................................................................................................... 87
Annex 1: Asset declaration ............................................................................................................... 88
Annex 2: Dossiers sent to national presecution .............................................................................. 101
Annex 3: Implementation of recommandations of public and private institution .......................... 103
Annex 4: Implementations of recommandations of Parliament on the report of 2012-2013 of the
office of the ombudsman…………………………………………………………………………..128
Annex 5: Institutions that did not designate staff in charge of providing information ................... 128
Annex 6: People convicted of corruption cases ............................................................................. 132
LIST OF TABLES
Table no 1: Training on preventing and fighting injustice corruption and other related offenses 16
Table no 2: training on law of leadership code of conduct and access to information ..................... 20
Table no 6: Injustice complaints treated during this year but received before .................................. 35
Table nº 8: Received complaints in Nyagatare District during the anti-injustice week ................... 38
Table n°12 : Number of recommendations provided and the level of their implementation. .......... 67
Table no 15: Declaration of assets from the employees who left their jobs ..................................... 76
Table no 17 : Comparison of assets declared by Land Officers and Heads of Finance Services in
Ministries (2011 -2013) ..................................................................................................................... 79
Table No 18 : Training provided to the staff of the Office of the Ombudsman ............................... 81
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure n◦2: Injustice complaints treated during this year but received before ................................. 35
ABBREVIATION
FOREWORD
Annually, the Office of the Ombudsman prepares a report of its activities which is presented to His
Excellency the President of the Republic of Rwanda and to the two Chambers of Parliament.
The Government and the Supreme Court are given copies of the report as it is provided in article 35
of the Law no 76/2013 of 11/9/2013 establishing the mission, powers, organization and functioning
of the Office of the Ombudsman. The above mentioned law provided to the Office additional
missions.This report therefore highlights main accomplishments in the different activities in 2013-
2014 which include:.
Sensitization aimed at preventinting and fighting injustice and corruption;
Fighting injustice;
Preventing and fighting against corruption;
Monitoring the observance of good governance principles;
Receiving and verifying declared assets and;
Coordination of the activities of the Office of the Ombudsman.
In this year, the Office of the Ombudsman put much emphasis in promoting good governance
especially in preventing and fighting injustice, corruption and related offenses. Also as mandated by
the law, the Office of the Ombudsman has the powers to carry out investigations of corruption
related offenses and to submit to courts of law suspects of such offenses for prosecution.
CYANZAYIRE Aloysie
Ombudsman
INTRODUCTION
As planned, the Office of the Ombudsman implemented its action plan 2013-2014. Different
activities were done basing on the following mandates as provided for in article 4 of the Law no
76/2013 of 11/09/2013 determining the mission, powers, organization and functioning of the Office
of the Ombudsman:
13. to advise public and private institutions as to improvement of the quality of services
delivered to the population;
14. to submit annually its program and activity report to the President of the Republic and the
Parliament, both Chambers and reserve copies to other State organs;
15. Follow up the enforcement of the Law relating to access to information;
16. to perform any other duties as may be assigned by law.
In the program of sensitizing the population on how to prevent and fight injustice and corruption,
the Office of the Ombudsman carried out training and dialogue with different categories of the
populaion. Trainings ralating to Organic Law nº 11/2013/OL of 11/09/2013 modifying and
complementing the Organic Law nº 61/2008 of 10/09/2008 on the leadership code of conduct, and
the Law nº 4/2013 of 08/02/2013 relating to access to information were also carried out.
In preventing and fighting injustice, the Office of the Ombudsman received 1.033 written injustice
complaints, and other 386 complaints through its program of receiving complaints at a District.
Complaints amounting at 2,572 regarding court judgment review due to injustice were received.
In its endeavors of preventing and fighting corruption, the Office of the Ombudsman received and
carried out investigation on 102 cases related to corruption. The Office of Ombudsman also
assessed public and private institutions, projects and programs. A follow up on the implementation
of the recommendations given by the Office of the Ombudsman was made for institutions audited in
2012-2013.
Regarding the activity of receiving and verifying declaration of assets using technology, the Office
of the Ombudsman received declarations of assets of 8,742 persons out of 8,777 of those supposed
to declare property while 35 officials did not declare their assets. For the activity of verifying the
origin of declared assets the Office of the Ombudsman of Rwanda verified assets of 1,320 persons.
Furthermore, in the follow up of the implementation of the Organic Law No 11/2013 of 11/09/2013
modifying and completing the Law No 61/2008 of 10/09/2008 on leadership code of conduct and
the Law N0 04/2013 of 08/02/2013 relating to access to information. The Office of Ombudsman
carried out investigation on members of Parliament both chambers, Ministers and Permanent
Secretaries in Ministries. Twenty nine (29) cases of non complying with the above mentioned
Organic Law were investigated on senior officials.
To accomplish its mission, the Office of the Ombudsman used funds from the national budget
amounting to 1,801,751,306 Rwandan Francs.
1. SENSITAZATION
The Office of Ombudsman prepared and carried out trainings to different categories of citizens in
Rwanda in order to sensitize them on their role in preventing and fight corruption and other related
offenses. Different discussions were organized specifically in anti Corruption week. The Office of
Ombudsman conducted trainings on the organic law of leadership code of conduct and on the Law
related to access to information.
1.1.1. Training on preventing and fighting injustice, corruption and other related offenses
In a bid to prevent and fighting injustice, corruption and related offences, the Office of the
Ombudsman prepared and carried out trainings to different categories of citizens in Rwanda. In
those trainings the Office of ombudsman focused on every category’s role in preventing and
fighting injustice corruption and other related offenses. Recommendations from the trainings were
sent to different institutions. The number of trainees who attended were two thousand three hundred
thirty seven (2,337) out of two thousand four hundred twenty seven (2,427) planned, the average of
attendance reached to 96,2% as shown on the following table:
Table no 1: Training on preventing and fighting injustice corruption and other related
offenses
The Office of the Ombudsman prepared and carried out trainings to different categories of citizens
with the purpose of preventing and fighting injustice and to instill the culture of detesting
corruption and reporting it. In this year the Office of Ombudsman focused on executive secretaries
of cells, and the Officers in charge of Socio-Economic Development (SEDO) of Cells. The reason
behind is because those civil servants are near and live daily with citizens and they can play a big
role in transforming them towards preventing and fighting corruption and injustice. This sector is
also among those where corruption is reported to be rampamt and where good service delivery is
lacking.
During the training, the trainees were reminded ofbetter ways of good service delivery aimed at
promotion of good governance, and they were also asked to do their best to solve citizens’
complaints and in implementing the execution of Gacaca courts and mediators decisions.
The different categories of trainees were sensitized to play a significance role in explaining to
citizens their right and to encourage them to settle their grievances without necessarily going in
courts.
In particular the executive secretaries (ES) and officers in charge of Socio-Economic Development
(SEDO) of Cells made the following demands/recommendation:
Rwanda National Police should collaborate with local authorities especially in execution of
court decisions and on security of citizens as they both have it as one of their
responsibilities.
Plan of regular trainings regarding the most applicable laws especially those relating to
execution of courts judgments. They also expressed difficulty in making reports regarding
execution of judgements where the loosing party cannot compersate due to the ‘ubudehe’
category one belongs to. A similar case is whereby the losing party registered his/her
properties in other people’s names which complicates execution of court decisions, Gacaca
courts decisions or Conciliators committees’ decisions.
The trainees requested the Office of the Ombudsman to advocate for them to the concerned
ministry to have special insurance to cover occupational hazards that may occur during
extra-working hours.
1.1.2. Training on the law on leadership code of conduct and access to information
In a bid to sensitize the population about the above mentioned laws in 2013 - 2014, the Office of the
Ombudsman had planned sensitization of different categories of people including journalists, ,
Internal Auditors in districts and Legal officers and public relation officers at the sectors, Districts
andin all publics instituions.. 735 persons were trained out of 961 that had been planned.
Training was also conducted in 9 higher instutions of learning out of 12 instituitions planned
ICK ;
IPB;
INATEK;
Umutara Polytechnique;
Gabiro Military Academy;
ISAE Busogo;
INES Musanze;
Tumba College of Technology;
ILPD.
The institutions that did not attend the training are the following:
UR – Huye Campus
Nyakinama Military Academy
Musanze Police Academy
The objective of this training
This training was attended by Public Relation Officers, Internal Auditors and Legal officers in all
the districts and public institions. The purpose of the above trainings was to create awareness of the
laws that the Office of the Ombudsman is mandated to implement as well as sensitizing the trainees
to provide information on those who do not observe them. The training in Higher Learning
Institutions was intended to instill in the students the culture of integrity as well as preparing future
leaders.
The Office of the Ombudsman published 3 editions of “Umuvunyi Magazine”. 9,000 copies
of the magazine were distributed in different parts of the country, different institutions as
well as to those who come to seek the services of the Office;
The Office of the Ombudsman also prepared 4,500 brocures explaining the work of the
Office as well as the activities geared towards fighting corruption;
The Office of the Ombudsman also used billboards in passing out its message in the city of
Kigali and its surbubs.
1.3.1. Newspapers
The Office of the Ombudsman delivered messages promoting its activities through different
newspapers including those online.
The Office of the Ombudsman passed promotional messages through radios and television and took
time to explain to the citizens relevent laws governing the Office of the Ombudsman, its activities
and others related to its mandate. The Office of the Ombudsman used Radio Rwanda, community
radios, private radios and Rwanda Television.
The Office of the Ombudsman produced a song with the message mobilizing the Rwandan citizens
to fight against corruption and report it wherever suspected. The song was sung by popular
musicians among the youth and it was particularly encouraging them to play their role in the fight
against corruption.
The Office of the Ombudsman organized a workshop on corruption in public procurement held on
19th November 2013. It was attended by 75 participants including representatives of public
institutions, the private sector and the platform of civil society. The main aim of the workshop was
to analyze the state and loopholes of corruption in public procurement and to put together strategies
to prevent and fight it.
Different views from participants led to resolutions to be implemented by public institutions, private
sector and civil society. Those resolutions were submitted to concerned institutions.
The United Nations General Assembly in its resolution no 58/4 adopted on 31st October 2003 in
Merida-Mexico, set aside the 9th December of every year as the International Anti-corruption Day.
The aim of celebrating that day is to raise citizens' awareness on bad effects of corruption and to
encourage them to play an active role in preventing and fighting it. In a bid to celebrate this day, the
Office of the Ombudsman prepares on annual basis an anti-corruption week which ends on the 09th
December. In the fiscal year 2013/2014, the week was launched on 04th December 2013 in Huye
District with the theme “Corruption undermines Rwandan values” and closed on 09th December
2013 in Kigali.
In collaboration with other institutional members of the National Advisory Council to fight against
corruption and injustice, different activities including talk shows on radios and television, messages
on billboards and websites, football competition, and youth anti-corruption day were organized.
The anti-corruption week was launched on 4th December 2013 in Huye District basing on its
initiatives in fighting against corruption. The ceremony was preceded by an anti-corruption walk
from Huye multipurpose house (imberabyombi) to the Stadium of University of Rwanda, College of
Arts and Social Sciences (CASS). After the walk, speeches and songs emphasizing on the theme
were presented. Different authorities who participated in that day encouraged the citizens to play a
big role in combating corruption.
In partnership with Kigali City, the Office of the Ombudsman organized on 05th December 2013, a
youth anti-corruption day which started with a walk from RAFIKI Club (Nyamirambo) to
Nyamirambo Regional Stadium. The objectives of this day were to sensitize youth about the evils
and effects of corruption and encourage them to desist from it, report and fight against it and its
related offenses. After the march, there were different presentations and speeches all focusing on
the theme of the year. Authorities who participated in that day gave messages encouraging the
youth to be a good example in the fighti against corruption. Youth members of anti-corruption clubs
from Universities delivered an anti-corruption message through a skit.
In collaboration with FERWAFA and Ministry of Culture and Sport, the Office of the Ombudsman
organized two football competitions on 08/12/2013 in order to disseminate anti-corruption message.
The first competition was between 2 teams of journalists (one of presenters from broadcasting
services and other of writers from newspapers) and the second was between Rayon Sports and
Police FC.
The objective of these competitions was to sensitize people on the negative effects of corruption,
and to encourage them to play a role in preventing and fighting it through sport.
During the half time of the competition between Rayon Sports and Police FC, the Deputy
Ombudsman in charge of preventing and fighting corruption and related offences and the Guest of
Honor, Honorable Minister of Sports and Culture delivered a message calling citizens to be partners
in the battle against corruption. These competitions were watched by around fifteen thousands
(15,000) citizens.
In preparing the opening of anti corruption week in Huye District, the Office of the Ombudsman in
partnership with Huye District provided a presentation through Salus Radio on the achievements in
the fight against of corruption. The listeners were informed about the negative effects of corruption
and were reminded of their role in fighting it.
On 5th December 2013 there was a talk show on different local radios countrywide. The talk show
was delivered by some stakeholders in the fight against corruption including the Office of the
Ombudsman, Supreme Court, Rwanda National Police and Ministry of Local Government.
On 8th December 2013, in partneship of the Office of the Ombudsman with Ministry of Local
Government, Rwanda National Police, Supreme Court, National Public Prosecution Authority and
Ministry of Justice, a talk show was aired on both Rwanda Television and Radio Rwanda on the
role of everybody in preventing and fighting coruption. Citizens were given opportunity to ask
questions and also express their views.
Different social networks were also used to sensitize people and to advertise the anti-corruption
week activities countrywide as well as outside the country.
Talk show on radio and television by different institutions on preventing and fighting corruption
On 9th December, at Kigali Serena Hotel, the International Anti -Corruption Day was celebrated
and also the anti-corruption week was closed. Presentations regarding fighting corruption were
given.
Among the presentations made were those by the Private Sector Federation on their role in fighting
against corruption, Platform of Civil Society on the role of civil society in fighting against
corruption and the Office of the Ombudsman on the status of implementation of the National anti
corruption policy. Participants were given opportunity to exchange ideas and views aiming at
strengthening the anti corruption strategies.
In his remarks, the guest of honor, President of the Senate emphasized on the evils of corruption
and called upon all citizens to combine their efforts in fighting it and promote Rwandan values.
2. FIGHTING INJUSTICE
As it was in its action plan of 2013/2014, the Office of the Ombudsmn carried out different
activities aimed at fighting injustice including recieving complaints of injustice from citizens, going
to Districts and Sectors and solving injustice cases in public gatherings where the citizens and local
authorities played a vital roleas well making a follow-up of the works of the anti-corruption clubs.
In accordance with article 4 of the Law no76/2013 of 11/9/2013 determining the mission, powers,
organization and functioning of the Office of the Ombudsman, the Office of the Ombudsman has
the following mandate:
To act as a link between the citizen and public and private institutions;
To prevent and fight injustice, corruption and related offences in public and private entities;
To receive and examine complaints from individuals and associations in connection with the
acts of civil servants, State organs and private institutions;
To mobilise such civil servants and institutions to resolve those complaints if it finds they
are founded.
It is in this regard that the Office of the Ombudsman received different injustice complaints brought
by citizens. These include those brought to the Office of the Ombudsman, those that were received
through written letters, email, telephone calls and those received by the staff of the Office of the
Ombudsman during the anti-injustice week at the field.
During the year 2013-2014, 1.033 written complaints were received. Among them 577 were
resolved, 214 were channeled to the concerned institutions. 386 complaints were received through
visits to Districts out of which 368 were resolved. The Office also received 2.572 complaints for
court judgement review and 1.306 of these were handled.
There are two categories of citizens who come to Office of the Ombudsman with injustice related
complaints; those that come for the first time seeking advice on their complaints and those that
come for follow up of their dossiers lodged with Office. For those that come for the first time, some
are given advice straight awaywhile others are advised to put their complaints in writing if the
Office finds they need thorough analysis or investigation. Others are advised to take their
complaints to the concerned institutions that are supposed to handle the complaints in the first
instance.
The written injustice complaints also fall into two categories. The first category is where the
complainant claims to have been treated unjustly by a fellow citizen or an institution. The second
category is where one party writes to the Office requesting for a review of a court judgment due to
injustice.
In all the injustice complaints received, 56% were resolved, while 23% are still undergoing
investigation. 21% were channeled to the concerned institutions. The complaints the Office
channels to the concerned institutions are those that do not fall under competencies of the Office of
the Ombudsman or those that were supposed to have been handled by competent institutions first.
This Figure shows that the bigger number of complaints falls in the category of land disputes. This
is caused by the program of land registration and land management policies. These initiatives
increased the number of conflicts among family members, as well as conflicts between leaders and
people who would to use their land differently from what policies desidnate. There are also
complaints of young survivors of the Genocide against Tutsi in 1994 whereby the Government
offered their land to other people during the land re-distribution process or whereby the land was
illegally sold off by their guardians. The number of such complaints is further increased by some
people who have right to land but its nolonger in their possession because of different reasons and
now seek resettlement from the government.
Looking at the number of complaints since the Office of the Ombudsman was established, land
disputes complaints are always dominant followed by complaints related to court judgments and
here still the subject matter in most cases is land. This is due to the fact that majority of Rwandans
depend on land, in that anything that any issue related to land, threatens their interests. There are
also those that are always eager to use any means to increase their land.
There is therefore need to put more effort in implementing the policies in place on land
administration and also devise strategies to reduce dependence on land while ensuring prosperity of
the citizens.
According to the article 79 of the Organic Law nº.03/2012OL of 13/06/2012 relating to the
structure, functioning and powers of the Supreme Court, the Office of the Ombudsman was
entrusted with powers of requesting the Supreme Court to review a judgment rendered at the last
instance due to injustice. If the office receives such complaint and it finds there is no injustice in the
decision of the court, it informs the complainant. If there is evidence of injustice in the case, the
Office writes to the Chief Justice, requesting for a review of the case.
As shown in the table above, there are Judgment review complaints received in 2013-2014 some of
which were analyzed while others are still pending. There are also other complaints that were
received in previous years including those received in the year 2012-2013 and those that were
received before the Office of the Ombudsman was given powers to request review of court
judgments due to injustice. Among the 1.306 complaints received, only 47, equal to 3.6 %, were
sent to Supreme Court for review.
According to the report given by Supreme Court, among 611 complaints sent for review, the Office
of the Inspector General of courts and tribunals has analysed 30 complaints. In those analysed, 18
cases were confirmed for review due to injustice. In these, the Supreme Court has so pronounced
itself on three (3) cases where indeed injustice was confirmed and is yet to pronounce itself on two
(2) others.
2.1.4. Injustice complaints treated during this year but received in previous years
There were outstanding complaints from previous years that the Office of the Ombudsman handled
during this year. Among them, there are those that were completed, those that were channelled to
the concerned institutions because they were out of the powers of the Office, and those that are
being worked on pending their fully analysis.
Table no 6: Injustice complaints treated during this year but received before
Figure no 2: Injustice complaints treated during this year but received before
1
61 complaints equal to 47 sent to Supreme Court requesting review in 2013-2014 plus 14 complaints received in
2012-2013
In order to facilitate the citizens to lodge their complaints with the Office of the Ombudsman
cheaply and fast, the Office set up cyber cafés managed by anti-corruption clubs and people use
them without having to come to the headquarters of the Office of the Ombudsman.
The complaints in the table above shows the total number of complaints received through cyber
café during this year and those that were sent to the Office of the Ombudsman. Those that were
concluded or seeking advice and those that required to be sent to other institutions, were done by
the anti-corruption clubs of youth that manage these cyber cafés. Those that were not sent to the
Office of the Ombudsman are mainly complaints of judgments concluded definitely by competent
courts and those that are still undergoing trials in different courts. The anti-corruption club members
analysises these complaints and advises the citizens accordingly. Complaints of injustice falling
within the competences of the Office of the Ombudsman are te ones sent to it for their follow up.
This table also shows that the cyber café of Rusizi District received the bigger number of
complaints compared to others. This is because the anti-corruption club that manages it is specially
structured. It operates at district level but it has its representatives in every sector of Rusizi District,
and this makes it possible to receive complainants from all Sectors. Regarding Nyagatare and
Ngoma, the anti-corruption clubs did not do their tasks as agreed.
Regarding the anti-corruption club of Ngoma, the Memorandum of Understanding with the Office
of the Ombudsman was rescinded and the cyber café was relocated to INATEK. The anti-corruption
club of Nyagatare committed itself to make more effort to achieve the intended objectives.
Pursuant to its program of going to grassroots to receive and resolve citizes’ complaints, the Office
of the Ombudsman carried out anti-injustice week in Nyagatare from 05 to 09 May 2014. Before
the real activity, citizens were informed of the sites where to meet the agents of the Office of the
Ombudsman along with the Local leaders at District, Sector and Cell and Village levels.
This program intended to sensitize citizens on the mission, powers and functioning of the Office of
the Ombudsman; instill the culture of preventing and combating corruption and injustice and giving
information in this regard. After the session of sensitization, citizens are given chance to air out
their complaints and the staff of the Office of the Ombudsman in collaboration with the local
leaders at different levels address them.
As the above table shows, among the complaints received in Nyagatare District, those that were
resolved immediately are 57%. Complaints that were not resolved immediately and needed to be
addressed by the District were 47%. These complaints left with the District were sent to the District
in a report for further follow up, and the District was given a deadline to have resolved them and
submitted the report to the Office of the Ombudsman.
Nyagatare District submitted a report on complaints resolved and those that were still in progress.
The following table shows the number of complaints resolved by Nyagatare district after being
requested by the office of the Ombudsman.
In the above table, it is clear that Nyagatare District gave report on 185 complaints, yet the
complaints left by the Office of the Ombudsman were 166. The difference of 19 complaints is
comprised of complaints that were already logged with the District and it deemed necessary to
include them in the report to the Office of the Ombudsman. Out of the 185 complaints, 138 were
resolved and 47 were still underway pending further investigation.
In a bid to prevent and fight corruption and related offenses, the Office of the Ombudsman received
complaints and information on corruption and other related offenses. It analyzed them and
conducted investigations and decisions were taken in this regard. It also coordinated the activities of
the Advisory Council to fight against corruption and injustice.
The Office of the Ombudsman has the mandate to preventg and fight corruption and related
offences in public and private institutions. In fulfilling this mandate, thorough investigations were
carried out on reported or initiated corruption cases and other related offenses. In 2013-2014, 121
cases related to corruption were investigated including 19 which were pending at the end of 2012-
2013 and 102 received in 2013-2014.
The Office of the Ombudsman received several information related to corruption, its loopholes and
misuse of public funds in 2013-3014. The Office investigated some of the cases in order to assess
their reliability and provide necessary recommendations.
The following table shows the number of corruption related cases received, their different
categories, resolved cases and those still pending.
3.1.1.1. Maladministration
The Office of the Ombudsman carried out investigations on reported cases of maladministration in
public and private institutions or companies as well as cooperative societies. In those investigations
carried out, it was observed that citizens usually suspect corruption on officials due to actions of
such institutions that are not in their interest. Usually those exist in the monitoring of illegal
constructions, in complaints handling or the issuance of permits. For some cases, there are no
evidences of such maladministration. The Office provided recommendations to institutions where
maladministration was found in order to improve their functionning.
Corruption is suspected in public procurement due to the breach of laws and procedures which leads
to corruption loopholes. This category includes also irregularities concering the contract execution.
There were also allegations related to the misuse of public funds by some officials. In the
investigations carried out, some cases of such misuse were observed, like misallocation of resources
or the use of public funds for private interests and later reimbursed. Loopholes of corruption were
also identified. The Office of the Ombudsman provided recommendations for the rational use of
public funds.
3.1.1.4. Embezzlment
There are some reported allegations alluding to embezzlement of public funds. In such cases, the
Office of Ombudsman conducts investigations, and where there is evidence of the alleged
embezzlement, such cases are forwarded to the National Police.
Some allegations received indicated cases where citizens were required to offer sex based
corruption in order to be offered a job or to be snug in service. The Office of the Ombudsman
investigated those allegations but did not find any evidence that may form basis for such case to be
submitted to courts of law. The table below shows the categories of corruption cases and their
status.
Table No 10: Cases of corruption
Category Received cases Concluded Cases forwarded to Pending cases
cases Prosecution or Police
Maladministration 61 55 0 6
Bribery 5 0 5 0
Misuse of funds 8 8 - 0
Embezzlement 5 4 - 1
Procurement 19 15 3 1
Sex based 4 4 - 0
corruption
Total 102 86 8 8
Percentage 100% 84% 8% 8%
Cases reported to the Office of the Ombudsman were treated as follows
3.1.2. Analysis and Investigation of some information related to corruption and related
offences
The Office of the Ombudsman received different information regarding corruption in some
institutions, corruption loopholes, and wastage of government resources in 2013/14. Investigations
were done on some of the information to establish their truthfulness and there by give
recommendations. The institutions that were investigated are the following:
Biogas plants set up in 2010 which are not functioning due to mistakes made during
construction on the part of the contractors who did not complete the works as agreed and
were not penalised; a few other biogas plants which are not functioning because the owners
don’t use them as specified;
Biogas plants set up country wide until February are 3,499. In 15 districts where
investigations were carried out, in 1,341 biogas plants that were constructed, those
functioning are 999, while 342 don’t;
Until June 2013, this project had been given a budget amounting to 2,909,923,894 Frw and
used 2,899,891,446 Frw including an amount of 2,170,097,595 Frw which was used in what
was termed as “program cost” and an amount of 729,793,851 Frw which was used on the
real project (subsidie);
Comparing the amount of money spent on the real project and the amount of money used in
other activities that were termed as “program cost” the amount used on the project is way
less (25.16%). The authorities concerned, say it because at at beginning of the project, it was
much needed to sensitize the citizens on its usefulness and also that its implementation is
still being followed up;
Credit facilities extended to citizens in regard to this project attracts high interests of 24% in
a period of 1 year;
It was also discovered that some biogas plants that malfunction and fail to be repaired
because those who can repair them are contractors of EWSA only.
Preliminary analysis conducted by the Office of the Ombudsman on this project in general,
12 tenders were assessed out of 15 tenders awarded in that project. The Auditor General’s
report had indicated 3 tenders were awarded that were not included in the procurement plan
and physical verificationin the tender for works on the road Sashwara – Kabatwa. The
assessment of the Office of the Ombudsman showed the following:
The tender for this project was studied well because it was divided into 12 other tenders
some of which did not comply with the laws and regulations governing public procurement.
Tenders were awarded with disregard of order of execution of work which led to delays in
some works because there were other works that needed to be executed first but whose
tenders had not been awarded on time. A typical example is where a tender for extraction of
peat was awarded before awarding the tender for preparing the site where the peat would be
extracted from and the tender for transportation of equipment to be used in the extraction of
the peat.
Until 24 April 2014, the project for extraction of peat had consumed funds amounting to
541,496,581 Frw and 20,111,922.58 USD. There were also other invoices that had not yet
paid amounting to 5,436,005,778.90 Frw and other disputed costs amounting to
3,440,729,426.31 Frw. In total, this project was suspended after consuming an amount of
22,108,854,934.19 Frw;
In the disputed costs, there is an amount 1,382,944,117.1 EWSA was fined by one company
which was in charge of extracting peat. This was after it was given an authorisation letter to
commence work and after delivering its equipment it found that the preliminary works
(building of a road and accessing water to site which were supposed to be done by another
company) were not yet over. The letter of authorisation to this company was written on
28/12/2012 but the preliminary works were over in April 2013;
Poor contract drafting which led to loss of public funds. For example, is the contract with
Yashinoya, there was no provision for penalties for a contractor who delayed work. This
delayed the progress of other works by other contractors which led them to fine the
government. Another example is the contract of GWDC, a company charged with preparing
the site for peat extraction whereby it would be paid even when there was no work done.
Recommendations given:
After assessing all the tenders where corruption was reported in these projects mentioned above and
the mistakes made, EWSA was given the following recommendations:
EWSA and the Districts should follow-up the contractors who left unfinished biogas plants,
those not properly done to be redone, to repare the damaged ones.
EWSA should train and follow up persons who buld biogas plants.
MININFRA should advocate for the citizens in SACCOs in order to reduce the interest rates
for credits facilities for biogas and to have uniform rates across the country.
EWSA should in future study the tenders putting emphasis on whether there are other
tenders involved and to be done on time
EWSA should evaluate projects of peat extraction to ascertain whether the benefits of the
project out weigh the losses the government might incur;
Pursuing administratively those who led government to incur losses especially those who
awarded tender contract to the extraction company before completion of preliminary works;
Legal officers of EWSA are hereby advised to always thoroughly assess the contracts before
they’re signed by both parties.
The process for awarding tenders in EWSA is worrying because it does not follow the laws
and regulations related to public procurement in Rwanda.
A report on these projects was availed to EWSA and it provided its thoughts and promised to
correct all the mistakes involved.
The Office of the Ombudsman made follow up of the information about corruption cases in
awarding of tenders and management of district land in Ngororero District. Some of the
irregularities found are the following:
Ngororero District does not notify the unsuccessful bidders the outcome of the the
bidding as provided by the law.
Awarding tenders not included in the procurement plan;
Awarding tenders with no performance security security given;
Disqualifying bidding entities with less value from bidding in unclear circumstances.
For example, SODIMEX offered amount of 150,427,277 Frw was disqualified
because on its documents, it was written on “SARL” while Trading Licence whose
documents were written on “Ltd” was not. The tender committee neglected the fact
that “SARL” is used in French as “Ltd” is used in English
Some contractors fail to execute their tenders and the district fails to withhold the
performance security.
On the issue of management of district land, those in charge could not show which land is
owned by the district, where it is located and what it is used for.
Recommendations given
The District of Ngororero was advised to observe the law and regulations governing public
procurement and those responsible for the mistakes which appeared in the report of the Office of the
Ombudsman to be penalised.
The Office of the Ombudsman provided a detailed report to the District of Ngororero it it gave its
thoughts on the issues raised. The report was also forwarded to National public Prosecution for
follow up of the offenses that appeared in awarding of tenders.
The Office of the Ombudsman carried out investigations on corruption loophole and misuse of
public resources in Nyarugenge District in order to give recommendations where there are such
cases and also pursue those involved. Preliminary investigations in assessing different documents
including those concerning awarding of tenders in the fiscal year 2011-2012, reports of auditors and
some documents of financial management in payment of funds related to the tenders assessed. In
the investigations, the folloing was discovered:
Non compliance with with the time frame for bidders in preparation of bidding documents.
This was visible in 5 tenders out of the 25 investigated which is contrary to Article 4 Law
No12/2007 of 27/03/2007 on public procurement as amended and complimented todate.
Poor studies which leads to extention of works which eventually leads to extra costs. In 3
tenders investigated, this issue was evident. For example, Tender
No029/MT/2011/2012/NYG had been budgeted for an amount of 777,056,076 Frw but was
spent on an amount of 811,741,825 Frw; Tender No018/MT/2011-2012 which was budgeted
for an amount of 270,700,000 Frw was spent on an amount of 305,243,070 Frw; Tender
No06/MT/2011-2012 had been budgeted for an amount of 36,137,910 Frw but was spent on
an amount of 43,126,200 Frw;
Delay in commencing works whose tenders were awarded which affects the contractor and
other beneficiaries;
Misappropriation of funds. This was evident the District was given funds amounting to
2,041,060,777 Frw by the Ministry of Internal Security for the construction of a prison in
Mageragere. This project project was not implemented as planned because an amount of
876,418,821 Frw was used by the District in other activities;
Mismanagement of rental houses in Nyabugogo Park. The District signed agreements with
different tenants for rent at the price of 300,000 Frw and 200,000 Frw for houses on ground
floor and first floor respectively. These tenants also rented out these premises at exorbitant
costs ranging from 550,000 Frw to 1,000,000 Frw without paying taxes corresponding to
these costs.
Recommendations given
The Office of the Ombudsman carried out investigations on information it had received with
allegations of injustice, favouritism and mismanagement of resources and staff in the Polytichnic
Institute of Byumba (IPB).
The Office of the Ombudsman carried out an assessment of the following;
Service delivery;
Observance of rules and regulations;
Relations between leaders and staff;
How students concerns are addressed;
Management of staff.
Investigations carried out on the activities of IPB of 2011 and 2012 showed the following.
accompanying document which makes it hard to ascertain what such amount of money was paid
for.
Recommendations given
After identifying the irregularities by the investigations carried out, the Office of the Ombudsman
gave the following recommendations:
IPB should strictly observe the regulations governing management of resources in relation to
making payments;
IPB should establish proper filing of purchase related documents and all other documents
related to such transactions;
To establish the appeals commission for reference in case of discontent with a decision
taken against any staff;
To hire more stuff in order to avoid combining responsibilities of procuring and managing
assets.
The office of the Ombudsman submitted a detailed report to the management of the Institute and
they gave their views. Thereafter, the report was also submitted to Administrative Council of IPB
and other concerned institutions
The Office of the Ombudsman received a complaint on the management of Islamic Health Center of
Bugarama whereby it was allegedly seized by ADIB (Association pour le Développpement
Islamique de Bugarama) yet the Center was constructed for the general interests of all muslims in
Bugarama and on their land.
Investigations revealed the following:
Health Center is erected on the plot of RMC (former AMUR) according to land titles. It was
constructed under the funding of Islamic Bank for Development;
Financial and material support to the Health Center was sought in the name of ADIB. All
the Muslims of Rusizi thought were members of ADIB but it was found, according to its
status, that ADIB is composed of only15 members. There are also some equipments that are
used in the Health Center while others stored due to lack of expertise of its workers who are
supposed to use them;
Part of the funds of about 75,000$ was not accounted for according to the report of Islamic
Bank for Development and as a result some projects were not implemented such as the
construction of Kamembe Primary school;
There is unaccountable use of funds of the Health Center. From 2008 to 2012, funds
amounting to 19,644,851 Rwf transferred by the District of Rusizi and meant for staff
salaries of the Health Center that does not have any financial supporting documents on how
it was utilised which makes it hard to ascertain whether it was properly utilised.
Additionally, there’s also an amount of 7,226,556 Rwf meant for the functioning of the
Health center deducted from its account but also unaccounted for;
There is dispute between ADIB members and Bugarama muslims who allege that ADIB
illegallyseized the property which is meant for the general interests of all muslims.
The Office of the Ombudsman requested RMC at national level to resolve these issues. In a meeting
convened on 7/6/2014 and chaired by the Rwanda Mufti Sheikh Ibrahim Kayitare, the following
were agreed on:
Islamic Health Center of Bugarama belongs to ADIB but it was constructed on
RMC/Bugarama’s land;
The equipments were given to the Health Center as a donation and therefore belong to the
Health Center;
RMC will sign a partnership agreement with ADIB as regarding the management of the
Health Center because it is constructed on the property of RMC/Bugarama;
The issue related to the construction of Bugarama Primary school was not discussed in that
meeting.
The Office of the Ombudsman finds the resolutions of the meeting between the disputing parties
sufficient and urges them to adhere to them or to make recourse to courts of law if not satisfied.
The Office of the Ombudsman investigated the case related to the construction of Huye stadium and
noticed a big delay of completion of works. The construction of the stadium was a plegde by HE
The President of the Republic when he visited Huye District during the presidential elections
campaigns in 2003.
The construction works of Huye stadium were dived in two phases. The first phase which was to
level the pitch and layout the synthetic turf started in 2011 while the second phase which was the
construction works started in 2012. In general, 5 tenders were awarded including the feasibility
study awarded by the District, two tenders for the execution of works in phases two phases and two
tenders for the supervision of works. These four tenders were awarded by the Ministry of Sports
and Culture. The funds for the construction of the stadium were allocated by the Government of
Rwanda.
After analyzing all documents related to the construction of Huye stadium and conducting
interrogations of different persons, the following irregularities were identified:
b) Works delays
Works delayed because the designs which were to be used by the contractor were not available on
time and additional works not planned for as mentionned above. Consequently, this led to delays in
the construction works and unplanned extra costs incurred.
Following the irregularities mentioned above, the Government of Rwanda will incur an unnecessary
extra payment of 915,472,186 Rwf for additional works not planned, contracts renewal more than
once for the contractor and the supervising company due to works delays.
After analyzing the above mentionned irregularities, the Office of the Ombudsman recommended
the following:
All concerned parties should strive for the fair completion of works;
MININFRA should make a close follow up of execution of the remaining works to avoid
another addendum contract which may incur extra expenses and delays of works;
Public institutions should be reminded to be careful in preparing terms of reference in
tenders to avoid mistakes that may lead the Government to extra expenses;
All organs related to construction of stadiums should work as a team to make sure that the
study is well done before works begin to avoid repeating works already done. Such a study
can serve as reference for future sonstructions of stadiums.
The Office of the Ombudsman received a complaint about lecturers at University of Rwanda, Huye
Campus who worked overtime but without payment for the extra time. Analysis of documents
showed that there are 33 lecturers who received their arrears from 2010 to 2013 amounting to
70,293,045 Rwf. It was also found out that as the investigations were ongoing, 15 more lecturers in
the Faculty of Science were paid 25,200,000 Rwf. (the payment was done on 24/03/2014.
So far 162 lecturers have not yet been paid for the overtime for the period from 2010 to 2013. This
resulted in arrears amounting 391,974,146 Rwf that the University of Rwanda owes to lecturers.
This is a violation of the lecturers’ rights which might affect their duties of lecturing.. To overcome
such situation, the University should set up mechanisms for a quick payment of existing errears but
also establish the mechanisms of paying overtime on time. It is in this regards, the University was
requested to establish the arrears payment program.
After receiving allegations of mismanagement in Gasabo District, the Office of the Ombudsman
carried out an audit of some services of the District. It analysed the procurement procedures,
contract management and unpayment of contractors in line with their contracts with the District.
The audit identified the following irregularities:
All tenders are not awarded as planned: out of 94 planned tenders in 2012 - 2013, only 64
were awarded. This resulted in the District not achieving its objectives in terms of
development and service delivery. According to the District officials explanations, this
happens when the planned tender is nolonger relevat or due limited budget;
The contract period is not respected: the District did not monitor the execution of some
contracts for final reception. Some delays stem from the fact that the District does not pay
the contractors the bills submitted on time;
The District delays to pay the contractors and other patners: this resulted in a huge debt
exceeding 1billion Rwandan francs. The delays in payment mostly results from poor
planning where sometimes the District starts to implement some activities it without budget;
The debt owed by the District to different contrators from 2012 to 7/4/214, the time of
conducting the audit, is 1,387,703,926 Rwf. An amount of 1,137,370,928 Rwf was supposed
to be paid from the District own revenues while an amount of 96,572,818 Rwf was to be
given by the development partners.
The fact that the District to owes such a big debt may lead it to lack of trust from the public which
may affect its development and may also lead to judicial proceedings against the government.
Irregularities in procurement procedures may create loophole for corruption.
The Office of the Ombudsman organized the meetings of Advisory Council to fight against
corruption and injustice at national level and meetings of the Technical Committee of the Council.
The Office also made a follow up of activities of Advisory Council to fight against corruption and
injustice at District and Sector levels.
3.2.1. Meetings of the National Advisory Council to fight against corruption and injustice
At national level, the Office prepared and chaired meetings of the Advisory Council to fight against
corruption and injustice on the following topics:
Responsibilities and the functioning of Advisory Council to fight against corruption and
injustice;
Implementation of the National anti-corruption policy;
The issue public asset recovery basing on court decisions of convicts of corruption and
related offences (still being pursued);
The issue of recovery of public properties illegally acquired by individuals (still being
pursued).
Members of the Technical Committee are from the institutional members of Advisory Council to
fight against corruption and injustice. The Office of the Ombudsman chaired the meetings of that
Committee and discussed the following items:
As provided for by the Presidential Order nº 64/01 of 12/02/2014, an Advisory Council was
established at District level. In 2013-2014, the Office of the Ombudsman made a follow up of
different activities of those Councils. Advisory Councils were also established at Sector level, and
their members were trained in all districts. Trainings focused on their responsibilities and the
Councils’ functioning.
The Office of the Ombudsman has the mandate of coordinating and monitoring the implementation
of the National anti-corruption policy. In this regards, all institutions, public or private, were
informed about that policy. Particulary, concerned institutions were requested to provide reports on
quarterly basis.
In the reports gathered, it was identified that some institutions don’t report as required.
Instistutions that reported include:
• Rwanda Correctional Services
• Media High Council
• Ministry of Justice
• Ministry of Finance and Economic Planning
• Ministry of East African Community
• Ministry of Public Service and Labor
• Ministry of Education through Rwanda Education Board (REB)
• Itorero ry’Igihugu
In the reports submitted, it appears that institutions tried to implement activities provided in the
National anti-corruption policy, those that are not implemented are continous activities or activities
that take a long time to implement.
An operational audit aims at examining how institutions fulfil their responsibilitities looking at their
functioning, compliance with their internal rules and regulations, collabolation with other organs
and the complementarity of their responsibilities with the general national policy. The audit
concerns all aspects of management of an institution with emphasis on issues that might be
vurnerable to loopholes of corruption and injustice. With the operational audit, important
recommendations are provided to improve the functionning of the audited institution in terms of
efficiency and effectivness.
The operational audit is conducted basing on some attributions of the Office of the Ombudsman,
including:
prevent and fight injustice, corruption and related offences in public and private entities;
advise Cabinet and other concerned institutions as regards strengthening and improving their
policy of preventing, fighting and punishing corruption and related offences;
contribute to the strengthening of good governance in all institutions.
Public institutions must comply with laws and regulations governing them for public interest.
Audited institutions include the Ministry of Health, Rwanda Social Security Board and the
Motorvehicle Inspection Center. In general, audited institutions were selected basing on the
following:
• the fact that services of such institution are sought or have an impact on a big number of
population;
• basing on information received by the Office of the Ombudsman on the functioning of an
institution that may have loopholes for corruption.
Ministry of Health was selected to be audited due to its highly needed services it provides to all
citizens of the country and the big budget it uses from the national budget and donors. MoH has the
mandate to ensure citizens universal access to health services by providing health centers, hospitals,
medical equipments and availing drugs to government pharmacies.
The operational audit revealed the following challenges and irregularities:
Some health related buildings are not appropriate: some buildings are not appropriate for
their intended use. An example is where you find a hospital with a maternity ward which
does not have a place for proper waste disposal;
Medical equipments purchased but not used yet are needed. For example there are
equipments meant for treatment of kidney in CHUK not used and different equipments in
Bushenge Hospital which are also not being used yet they’re needed;
A debt of 6,095,586,853 Rwf owed to different health centers and hospitals: this mostly
results from insurance coverage (mutuelle de santé contributions) meant to be paid by MoH
and districts;
Lack of proper procurement procedures in District Pharmacies;
Tenders planned but not executed and tenders executed but not planned for;
Incomplete files of some staff;
Doctors and public servants working in District Hospitals do not get their gratification
resulting from their annual performance evaluation: their performances are evaluated but
they are not given the bonus yet their counterparts at MoH get it. Although, during the
operational audit, it was discovered that all necessary steps had been taken for them to get
the bonus for the years 2011 and 2012.
To improve its functioning, MoH should observe laws and regulations governing the management
of its staff, assets, and public procurement procedures. Employees on the same level should be
given the same PBF bonus in order to avoid favoritism and nepotism tendencies.
Rwanda Social Security Board is an institution providing many services to many persons being civil
servants or other citizen in general, and has a great impact on wellbeing of the population. Basing
on its services, the Office of the Ombudsman audited the operations of RSSB mainly to identify if
there were no loopholes for corruption. Social Security Board is mandated to promote social
security, mutual health benefits, servent pensions payment, collection and management of clients'
contributions provided by the law.
In order to improve its functioning, RSSB should comply with laws and regulations governing use
of resources, adopt strong investment strategies and promote good management of property,
improve audit and inspection as well as implement the recommendations provided.
Motorvehicle Inspection Center is part of the Department of Traffic and Road safety in Rwanda
National Police. The Center has been operational since 2008 and mandated with the responsiblity to
conduct technical inspection for all road vehicles in order to prevent and reduce the rate of road
accidents.
The Center was selected to be audited based on information gathered that there were
maladministration and also corruption tendencies in the provision of technical control certificate.
Motorvehicle Inspection Center makes effort in conducting technical inspection of road vehicles
and providing certificate for roadworthiness. In 2012, inspection was done on 64,201 vehicles
while in the first 8 months of 2013 38,022 vehicles were inspected. Vehicle with technical problems
are not given the certificate allowing them to operate on Rwandan roads unless the problems are
fixed. Even though the Center availed the number of vehicles inspected, the number of all vehicles
supposed to be technically controlled is still unkown.
Motorvehicle Inspection Center has adopted corruption preventive strategies such as awareness
meetings, trainings, talk shows in media and rotation of staff on duty. Those suspected to be
involved in corrupt practices were administratively punished and some even dismissed from
Rwanda National Police.
Recomendation made to the center was to respect laws and regulations governing resources
management and to also conduct the technical control of Rwanda National Police vehicles and those
of Rwanda Defense Force as they also transport human beings.
Government programs assessed in 2013-2014 include Crop Intensification Program (CIP) and
Umurenge Saving and Credit Cooperatives (SACCOs). Objectives of the assessment were to
evaluate their implementation and see if they achieve their targets and to examine if there are no
loopholes for corruption and injustice in their management. Those programs were chosen due to
their great impact in promoting farmers and small and medium investment as they play a big role in
social and economic development.
CIP is a government program with the goal of promoting agriculture by significantly increasing the
production. The program focuses on the following:
In implementing the consolidation of land use, land parcels consolidated increased from 28.016 ha
in 2008 to 602,000 ha in 2012. The priority crops, depending on the nature of the soil, are; maize,
beans, rice, soy beans, cassava, bananas, irish potato, wheat and sunflower.
Rwanda Agriculture Board plays a big role in the implementation of that program by providing
improved seed and fertiliser to increase food productivity. The assessment revealed that the
implementation of that program has the following contraints:
• the level of citizens understanding of the program is still low;
• Insufficient improved seeds;
• Little financial capacity of farmers which makes fertiliser unaffordable.
• Lack of sufficient production storage facilities;
• Climate change.
For a better impact of Crop Intensification Program to farmers, the following must be considered:
• Strengthen agricultural cooperatives because they have easy access to market for their
production;
• Reinforce SACCOs and other credit and savings schemes so as to be able to provide needed
loans to farmers;
• Increase the improved seeds;
• Initiate the improved storage facilities of production;
• Monitor the distribution of fertilizers;
• Strengthen sensitization of the population on the benefits of the program.
Umurenge Saving and Credit Cooperatives (SACCOs) started in 2009, and it is operational in all
Administrative Sectors of the Country. The purpose of establishing Umurenge SACCO was to
allow people especially in rural areas to have access to financial institutions in order to save money,
access loans and credits.
SACCOs have acheived many important things for the citizens’ development. The number of
members is increasing due to the mobilization system. As long as members increase, their savings
are increasing as well. SACCOs provide loans to members to finance their development projects
such as farming, and small or midium businesses. The assessment covered 3 SACCOs per District
in 10 Districts.
Private institutions and associations assessed in 2013-2014 are Cement Industry (CIMERWA),
Kabuye Sugar works, Society Rwandaise d'Assurance (SORAS Group Ltd), Société Nouvelle
d’Assurance du Rwanda (SONARWA Holdings Limited) and Rwanda Federation of Football
Association (FERWAFA). They were selected to be assessed because their services reach a big
number of population, therefore they must prevent and fight corruption and injustice in their
functioning aiming at promoting good governance.
CIMERWA is a private company in which the Government has 16.55% shares, Pretoria Portland
Cement (PPC Ltd): 51%, Rwanda Social Security Board
(RSSB): 20.24%, Rwanda Investment Group (RIG): 11.45% and SONARWA: 0.76%. CIMERWA
plays a crucial role in the welfare of the population living in the neighboring Administrative
Sectors. It established a Health Center, a nursery and primary school and it has also provided the
neighboring population with water for free of charge. However, the production of cement has
reduced from 102.935,75 tons in 2007 to 81.648 tons in 2012. The main causes of decrease in
production are the old machines, the cost of fuel oil, high prices of key input such as the stone
called gypsum imported from Kenya.
During the assessment, some irregularities were noticed in human resources management due to the
fact that some employees’ files were incomplete and employees dont have accident insurance.
Assets and petty cash are not well managed and the internal regulations on procurement are not
respected.
KSW is a company producing sugar from its sugar plantations and plantations of citizens. It has two
shareholders: Independent Sugar Corporation Ltd holds 49,500 shares and Koduvayur Parasuraman
Eswar with 500 shares.
KSW faces a challenge of decrease of production due to the fact that in 3.148 ha, sugar cane can
only be planted on 1,700 ha (54%) while the remaining is unexploited due to floodings and water
stagnation. The decrease of production of sugar is also caused by insufficiency of appropriate
machinery for sugar cane transformation.
KSW has not yet achived its target of producing 17,000,000 kg of sugar per year. In the financial
year of 2011-2012, KSW produced 8,384,500 kgs of sugar while in 2012-2013 it produced
7,939,850 kgs.
With the aim of boosting the sugar cane harvest and sugar production, KSW has a strategy of
increasing sugar cane cultavation on uphills and swampy area, draining swamps where sugar canes
are grown, using fertilizers and mobilizing farmers to form cooperatives. Successful
implementation of those strategies needs the partnership of KSW and concerned institutions such as
MINAGRI, MINICOM, RCA and Districts.
SORAS is a private insurance company created in 1984, it has a big role in the development of the
population because it contributes to their savings and investiments. There are loopholes
for corruption in the procurement process of SORAS Group Ltd due to lack of proper procurement
plan and procurement procedures manual.
In compensating a client, there is a time frame of five days for a client to be compensated but
sometimes this time is exceeded. There is no mechanism established to inform clients progress of
their cases or missing documents.
SORAS Group Ltd was recommended to establish internal rules and regulations, corruption
preventive strategies and improve service delivery.
SONARWA is composed of two insurance companies with different managing organs, SONARWA
General Insurance Company Limited (SONARWA General) and SONARWA Life Insurance
Company Limited (SONARWA Life). The assessment revealed that SONARWA does not have
internal rules and regulations; it lacks a procurement plan and long term business plan. Even if
SONARWA is audited by external auditors such as the Central Bank of Rwanda and Rwanda
Revenue Authority, some audit recommendations are not implemented.
As regards service delivery, SONARWA set time frame of handling all claims of clients related to
accidents, but delays in reparation of vehicles, payment of bills and compensation were observed.
There is the lack of a mechanism to inform clients the progress of their cases or missing documents.
In order to achieve its attributions, SONARWA was recommended to establish internal rules and
regulations and improve service delivery.
The budget of FERWAFA is delived from subscriptions of its member clubs, funds from FIFA and
money from competitions and other partners. At the time of assessment, the subscription of member
clubs was totaling to 4,686,000 Rwf was not yet paid by teams of the first division while a total of
1,732,000 Rwf was not yet paid by teams of the second division. This leaves FERWAFA with
insufficient funds, a big challenge which hampers its good functioning.
FERWAFA works closely with MINISPOC in the management of national team in covering all
expenses of the National team. However, the partnership between the two is not good because of a
debt of 382,615,748 Rwf which is the attributed to FERWAFA yet it is supposed be paid by
MINISPOC. FERWAFA is owed an amount of 100 000USD by SPOT FIVE Company. This
company was the successful bidder to sell services of advertisement in all matches of the national
competition cup of under 20 held in Rwanda in 2009; SPOT FIVE collected money for the
advitisement at the stadium by different companies and had an obligation to pay FERWAFA an
amount of 100 000 USD as provided for in the contract.
The Office of the Ombudsman is mandated with advising public and private institutions in order to
improve the quality of services delivered to the population.
For this purpose, Office of the Ombudsman conducts operational audit in public institutions in order
to assess their functioning and make recommendations for the improvement of their performance in
terms of efficiency and effectiveness. After issuing recommendations, the Office undertakes a
follow up to evaluate the implementation of these recommendations.
In this period of 2013-2014, the follow up was conducted in 51 Institutions and 43 of them have
reported how the given recommendations were implemented.
The following table shows how 43 Institutions have implemented the given recommendations.
Table n°12 : Number of recommendations provided and the level of their implementation.
As it is indicated by the table, among the 43 Institutions that reported how the recommendations
provided by Office of the Ombudsman were implemented, 36 of them implemented the
recommendations at the level of 50% and above while 7 Institutions are at the level of
implementation below 50%.
The 8 Institutions that did not report how the recommendations given were implemented are the
following:
Gasabo District
Kicukiro District
Burera Distict
MINAGRI
MINAFFET
RRA
CCOAIB
Kilinda Hospital
In the year 2013-2014, also follow up was conducted for the institutions reported in 2012-2013
which did not implemented any recommendations, reminding them to report the status of
implementation. The following table shows the comparison of status of implementation of
recommendations between the periods of 2012-2013 and 2013-2014.
The above table shows that in the period of 2013-2014, there was an improvement in implementing
the recommendations compared to the period of 2012-2013. In fact, in the period of 2012-2013,
among the 64 (100%) recommendations given to 9 institutions, 27% only were implemented, 23%
were in process of being implemented while 50% were not implemented however in the period of
2013-2014, it was noticed that 72% of the given recommendations were implemented, 22% were in
process of being implemented and 6% were not yet implemented.
The Office of the Ombudsman conducted investigations on the cases concerning the behaviour of
leaders at work place and outside. Those cases are categorized according to their context. The
Office of the Ombudsman also conducted investigation on cases related to the Access to
Information Law.
The Office of the Ombudsman received different information concerning misconduct of Leaders at
their work place. That information was received in the following way:
The Office of the Ombudsman received information concerning the misuse of government vehicles
in two Higher Institutions of Learning by Senior Officials in those institutions. The investigations
found the information to be true and the Office of the Ombudsman sought administrative sanctions
against one of the leaders.
The same leader is also accused for the following other misconducts:
- Failing to pay items/ assets bought from Public auction;
- Failing to pay house rent of the institution;
- Unjustified absenteeism at work.
The investigation found that the allegations of the leader’s behaviour was relevant and the cases
submitted to the National Public Prosecution Authority.
The investigations found out that those employees were recruited without competition and their
contracts where illegally renewed. The Office of the Ombudsman discussed with the concerned
authorities on those findings and agreed to correct that maladministration.
The Office of the Ombudsman conducted a monitoring on article 6 of the Organic Law N°
11/2013/0L of 11/09/2013 modifying and complementing the Organic Law nº 61/2008 of
10/09/2008 on the leadership code of conduct related to contracts prohibited to a leader. The
monitoring aimed to assess if leaders have personal contracts with a foreign country or an
international organization that has diplomatic relations with the Republic of Rwanda. The
monitoring found that there are some leaders who concluded some personal contracts but
which don’t compromise the general interests of the State.
The monitoring also was done on the Organic Law concerning other incompatibilities with
the duties of a leader. The monitoring based on the article stating that “A Leader governed
by this Organic Law shall be allowed to be a member of a non- governmental organization.
However, he/she shall not be authorized to head a non- governmental organization, except
where such an organization is exclusively comprised of leaders governed by this Organic
Law or an organization primarily composed of leaders irrespective of other persons not
subject to this Law who may join. It was observed that fifteen (15) leaders did not respect
that provision and they have been contacted and all of them resigned.
During this financial year of 2013-2014, in order to verify if leaders implement all the
provisions of those two laws, the Office of the Ombudsman carried out a monitoring of
implementation of the Organic Law. That monitoring activity was done on the new Cabinet
members, Senior Officials in Ministries, Senators, Deputies and other Senior Officials who
work in the Parliament, both Chambers. The activity targeted 136 Senior Officials. 120 were
monitored.
Leaders who didn’t set the internal rules and regulation in their institutions;
One leader who didn’t pay tax on immovable properties ;
3 Senior Officials who received gifts in line of work but didn’t declare them as provided by
the Presidential Order.
Since the Office of the Ombudsman was assigned to monitor the implementation of the Law n°
04/2013 of 08/02/2013 relating to Access to Information, the Office received different complaints
related to the access to information as follows:
A news paper brought a case to the Office of the Ombudsman complaining of not getting
information requested in different organisations.
A lawyer was complaining on behalf of his client for not being provided with information
from a small financial institution. For both cases the Office found the complaints relevant
and requested the institutions to provide the information sought. In these cases the people
who were supposed to provide the information claimed they were not aware of the
provisions of the law.
Other two issues were sorted out by just directly contacting the concerned entities and they
provided the information.
During the year of 2013-2014, The Office of the Ombudsman implemented the mandate of
receiving and verifying of files of declaration of assets made by leaders, civil servants and Rwandan
political organizations as follows:
Sensitization for declarers;
Receiving the declaration of assets from persons determined by the law;
Receiving the declaration of assets of political organizations and verifying their origin and
their use;
Analysis and verification of files of declaration of assets;
Comparison of assets declared by Land Officers and the Head of Finance services under
ministries within 3 years (2011-2013);
Investigation on non declared assets;
seeking administrative sanctions against those who failed to declare in the year 2013;
Upgrading the Online Declaration of Assets System (ODAS).
In order to make sensitization of the persons who have to declare their properties as stipulated by
the law, the Office of the Ombudsman did the following:
Broadcasting on different local radios, announcements through the private and public news
papers;
Short messages on declarer’s mobile phones;
Posting on the Office of the Ombudsman website a video showing the steps of the online
declaration process;
Publishing the activity of declaration of assets as well as its importance on national radio
and television.
During the year 2014, through the Online Declaration of Assets System, the Office of the
Ombudsman received the declaration of assets of the leaders from different institutions as well as
the civil servants provided by the Law No 76/2013 of 11/9/2013 determining the mission, powers,
organization and functioning of the Office of the Ombudsman.
32 individuals failed to declare their assets. The table showing the level of accomplishment of
declaration of assets activity as provided by the Law is found on the appendix no 1.
In addition, the Office of the Ombudsman received the files of the declaration of assets from 17
civil servants who left their jobs as it is provided by law. Those individuals are in the following
institutions:
Table no 15: Declaration of assets from the employees who left their jobs
POLITICAL ORGANIZATIONS
As it is provided by the article 4, paragraph 5 of the Law no 76/2013 of 11/9/2013 determining the
mission, powers, organization and functioning of the Office of the Ombudsman, the Office received
and verified the assets declaration from 10 Rwandan political parties. Those 10 political parties are
FPR-Inkotanyi, PDC, PDI, PL, PPC, PSD, PS Imberakuri, PSP, PSR, and UDPR.
During the year 2013-2014, The Office of the Ombudsman analyzed and verified 1,320 files of
assets declaration. 1,320 persons who have been verified are from different categories and different
institutions as follows:
No Categories Number
1 Deputies 80
2 EWSA 107
3 NEC 9
4 NISR 27
5 PADAB 12
6 PAREF 4
7 PHS 23
8 NCBS 17
9 RBC 103
10 RBS 72
11 RDB 65
12 REB 53
13 RGB 17
14 RLDSF 21
15 RSSP 26
16 SPIU/MOH 30
17 SPIU/MINAGRI 27
18 Kigali City 57
19 Districts(30) 546
20 WDA 24
TOTAL 1,320
Among 1,320 persons who were verified, 1,306 persons had the legally accepted source of their
properties and 14 persons failed to explain clearly the source of their properties which necessitated
conducting thorough investigations which are still in process.
During the year 2013-2014, the Office of the Ombudsman made comparisons of the assets of 100
persons including 50 persons from Land Services in all districts (30); 20 persons from Finance
services in all ministries and 30 persons from Rwanda Natural Resources Authority (RNRA). The
compared assets were those which declared in last 3years (2011, 2012 and 2013) with the purpose
of highlighting if the increase of declared assets is proportional to the declared revenues.
That comparison put into consideration how the declared houses, lands and money have increased
within those 3 years.
The results of the comparison are shown in the table below:
Table no 17 : Comparison of assets declared by Land Officers and Heads of Finance Services
in Ministries (2011 -2013)
During the year 2013-2014, the Office of the Ombudsman conducted investigation on 4 cases
related to the assets declaration. Those 4 cases were outtanding from the year 2012-2013. In one
case there was enough evidence and has been submitted to the National Public Prosecution
Authority (NPPA) while 3 cases lacked evidences.
Also, the investigation on 17 cases related to illicit enrichment has been conducted. Among those
cases, 4 cases including 6 persons were completed and sent to the National Public Prosecution
Authority; 5 cases had satisfying explanations and have been archived. However, 8 cases are still
under investigation.
The 2012-2013 Ombudsman’s annual report showed 211 (2%) persons who failed to declare their
assets as it is provided by the Law. The Office of the Ombudsman sent to the concerned institutions
letters seeking administrative sanctions against them and requested them to declare their assets as of
2013. The institutions that received the above mentioned letters responded as follows:
32 employees left their jobs and are no longer in public institutions;
179 employees were requested to fulfill the assets declaration and were also given
administrative sanctions as following:
- 64 employees were requested to give official explanations;
- For 36 employees, 1/4 of their monthly salary has been deducted;
- 44 employees have been reprimanded;
- 35 employees have been given warning letters.
The staff of the Office of the Ombudsman were trained on the following topics:
Conflict management;
Anti-corruption, financial crimes and Assets recovery;
Customer Care/Service delivery;
In a bid to promote good relations with institutions of foreign countries, the Ombudsman and
Deputy Ombudsmen and other staff of the Office attended different meetings and workshops in
different countries including Uganda, Kenya, Burundi, Korea, Senegal, Astria, Panama and Ghana.
The office of the Ombudsman also had different visitors from different countries. The following
table shows visitors of the Office of the Ombudsman from different countries.
In order to fulfil its responsibilities, the Office of the Ombudsman utilised its budget in the
following way:
The budget of the Office of the Ombudsman was eutilised to the tune of 99%. The amount not
utilised is 22,168,591FRW:
Funds amounting to 7,508,853FRW were meant for activities that would not be achieved in
time;
Funds amounting to 5,289,816FRW were meant for a contractor who did not finish the work
contracted;
Funds amounting to 2,900,936FRW were also meant for a contractor who did not finish the
work contracted;
Funds amounting to 2,613,456 were meant for payment of transportation costs within the
country but invoices were not availed on time;
Funds amounting to 2,293,043FRW were meant for payment of radio programs but the
contractors did not issue invoices on time.
CONCLUSION
In this year, 2013/14, the Office of the Ombudsman excuted the activities it had planned in its
action plan as mandated by by the Law No 76/2013 of 11/9/2013 determining the mission, powers,
organization and functioning of the Office of the Ombudsman.
In the act of sensitization, different categories of citizens were trained in a bid to sensitize them to
fight injustice, corruption and related offenses and good service delivery. In this category, trainings
were done for Religious leaders, youths and women groups, Executive Secretaries of Cells as well
as those in charge of social welfare and development at cell level. Trainings on the Law governing
leadership code of conduct and the Law on access to information were also carried out and targeted
public relations officers, internal auditors, legal officers in government institutions as well as
journalists. In collaboration with other institutions, the Office of the Ombudsman celebrated the ant-
corruption week and the International Anti-corruption Day. In that week, messages and discussions
explaining the evils of corruption were passed calling upon the citizens to decist from it and report
it whenever and wherever they see it.
In a bid to fight injustice and corruption, the Office of the Ombudsman received 1,033 cases of
injustice and 2,572 cases seeking judicial review due to injustice. Among the challenges the Office
faces include cases of injustice that take long to be resolved like cases where cases involving many
parties which also require concerned institutions to first thoroughly study them before they handled.
They are also institutions that do not provide requested information on time which makes the Office
of the Ombudsman to delay in making a decision. There’s also limited personnel vis-a-vis the
number of complaints the office receives.
In the fight corruption and related offenses, the Office of the Ombudsman carried out investigations
on 102 corruption related cases. 66 cases showed tendencies of maladministration of institutions.
In a bid to promote good governance, the functioning of government institutions, projects and
policies, private institutions and societies were assessed. The Office of the Ombudsman highlighted
to assessed institutions where good service delivery is lacking and gave recommendations for
improvement.
In 2014, 8,742 dossiers of declaration of assets by leaders and other officials prescribed by law were
received. Those who failed to declare their assets were 32 only. Declared assets of 1,320 leaders
and Officials were assessed.
In monitoring the implementation of the Leadership code of conduct, the Office of the Ombudsman
discovered that some leaders do not adhere to the provisions of this law in carrying out their duties
and those who, it appeared they did not were advised to do so while those who were suspected of
some offenses, their cases were forwarded for prosecution.
REQUEST
In accordance with Organic Law nº.03/2012OL of 13/06/2012 relating to the structure, functioning
and powers of the Supreme Court, the Office of the Ombudsman was entrusted with powers of
requesting the Supreme Court to review a judgment due to injustice. These extra responsibilities led
to a large number of cases seeking for review due to injustice. Due to the nature of these cases, it
takes a lot of time to analyse them and more keep coming as more citizens become aware of this
avenue. There is therefore need to increase capacity of the Office by increasing the number of
personnel who handle these cases so that citizens can have quick and better services.
ANNEXES
Annex 5: Public Institutions that haven’t designated stuff responsible for providing information
3 Senators 78 78 0
4 Deputies 24 24 0
Total 134 134 0
Chamber of Deputies
1 Employees of Senate 43 43 0
2 Employees of chamber of 19 19 0
Deputies.
Total 62 62 0
Supreme Court and Prosecution
1 BIB 7 7 0
13 GMO 10 10 0
14 GIP 14 14 0
15 HEC 14 14 0
16 ILPD 13 13 0
17 INMR 31 31 0
18 IPRC East 16 16 0
5 NYAMAGABE 94 94 0
6 NYANZA 86 86 0
7 NYARUGURU 64 64 0
Security 1
Journalist 1 Journalist
Total 49
A. MINISTRIES
1. MINADEF (Ministry of Defense)
2. MINAFFET (Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Cooperation)
3. MINEDUC (Ministry of Education)
4. MINIJUST (Ministry of Justice)
5. MININFRA (Ministry of Infrastructure)
6. MININTER (Ministry of Internal Security)
B. PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS
1. HEC (Higher Education Council)
2. ILPD (Institute of Legal Practice and Development)
3. INMR (Institute of National Museums of Rwanda)
4. LWH (Land and Husbandry, Water Harvesting and Hillside Irrigation)
5. NAFA (National Forestry Authority)
6. NAWOC (National Women Council)
7. NLC (National Land Center)
8. NURC (National Unity and Reconciliation Commission)
9. OGMR (Rwanda Geology and Mines Authority)
10. Parliament Chamber of Deputies
11. PSCBS (Public Service Capacity Building Secretariat)
12. RBA (Rwanda Broadcasting Agency)
13. RBS (Rwanda Bureau of Standards)
14. RDB (Rwanda Development Board)
15. RDRC (Rwanda Demobilization and Reintegration Commission)
16. REB (Rwanda Education Board)
17. RIAM (Rwanda Institute of Administration and Management)
18. RTDA (Rwanda Transport Development Agency)
19. RURA (Rwanda Utilities Regulatory Agency)
20. Rwandair
21. WDA (Workforce Development Authority)
22. OGS (Office of Government Spokes Person)
23. CHUK
24. CHUB
Residence of Mwizibire-
Nkanga- Sake-Ngoma-
Eastern Province
3. RP NGIRUWONSANGA
MAKOMBE Callixte,
Son of Makombe Ernest
Male "Inkeragutaba TGI NGOMA Demanding and 1 year of
and Mukajomene, Born
ra" receiving a bribe imprisonment and a
in 1972, Residence of
of 40,000 Rwf fine of
Nyagasambu- Musumba-
Nyamirama- Kayonza- 100,000 Rwf
10. RP0015/13/ HABIMANA Léonard, Male Pastor TGI MUHANGA Giving a bribe of 2 years of
Son of Kangabo and 180,000 Rwf imprisonment
TGI/MHG
Mukamugasa, Born in
14. RP 0119/13/ CPL KIZA Steven, Son Male Policeman TGI Demanding and 1 year of
of Karama and NYARUGENGE receiving a bribe imprisonment and a
TGI/NYGE
Mukamwezi, Born in of 200,000 Rwf fine of 900,000
1985, Residence of Rwf
Kacyiru- Gasabo- MVK
15. RP0415/13/ SHUMBUSHO Male Businessman TGI MUHANGA Giving a bribe of 1 year of
Sosthène, Son of 2,000 Rwf imprisonment and a
TGI/MHGA
Gashugi and fine of 20,000
Nyiraminani, Born in Rwf
1980, Residence of
Gitwa- Gasayo-
Karengera- Nyamasheke-
NZAYISENGA Xavier, Male Local Defense TGI KARONGI Receiving a bribe 1 year of
Son of Bangana and of 11,000 Rwf imprisonment and a
Mukashyaka, Born in fine of 60,000
1983,Nyabinyenga- Rwf
Kagabiro- Mubuga-
Karongi- Western
Province
21. RP GATETE Ibrahim, Son Male Motocyclist TGI GASABO Giving a bribe of 1 year of
0372/13/TGI/ of Hakiba and 5,000 Rwf Imprisonment
Mukakarenzi, Born in
GSBO
1990, Residence of
Munanira- Rugarama-
Nyamirambo-
Nyarugenge- MVK
22. RP GATSINZI Augustin, Male Driver TGI GASABO Receiving a bribe 3 years of
0361/13/TGI/ Son of Karenzi and of 35,000 Rwf imprisonment and a
Mukarukwaya, Born in fine of 105,000
GSBO
1964, Residence of Rwf
Kadobogo- Kagugu,
Kinyinya- Gasabo-MVK
HARELIMANA RWEGO René, son of Male Businessman HC KIGALI Complicity with Imprisonment of 5
HARELIMANA Martin and TURATSINZE years and a fine of
MUKAMUNANA Sifora, born in 1980, Cyrille in receiving 4,000,000
residence of Gapfupfu- Nyakabanda- a bribe of
Nyarugenge- MVK 2,000,000Rwf
2. RPA MAJYAMBERE Emmanuel, son of Male Haircutter HC KIGALI Giving a bribe of Imprisonment of 2
0710/13/HC/KI NDUWIMANA and MUKANKUSI, born in 60,000Rwf years
G 1984, residence of Intwari- Kimironko-
Gasabo- MVK
3. RPA0691/13/H NSABIMANA Ildephonse, son of Male "Inkeragutabar HC KIGALI Asking a bribe of Imprisonment of 2
C/KIG NGIRINSHUTI fidèle and a" 60,000Rwf years
MUKARUTABANA Hélène, residence of
Inganzo- Katabaro- Kimisagara- Nyarugenge-
NSABIMANA Martin ,son of Male Local Defense HC KIGALI Asking a bribe of Imprisonment of
NZABARINDA and UWIRAGIYE, 60,000Rwf 2years
residence of Inganzo- Katabaro- Kimisagara-
Nyarugenge- MVK
TWIZEYIMANA Jean Bosco, son of Male Local Defense HC KIGALI Asking a bribe of Imprisonment of 2
KAREGEYA and 60,000Rwf years
MUKARUSHEMA,residence of Inganzo-
Katabaro- Kimisagara- Nyarugenge- MVK
4. RPA0787/13/H MASABO Jean, son of UKOZIVUZE and Male Driver HC KIGALI Giving a bribe of Imprisonment of 1
C/KIG NYIRAHABIYAMBERE, residence of 10,000Rwf year and a fine of
Nyamugali-Kamugarura-Nyamugali- Ngoma- 40,000Rwf
East
6. RPAA0018/13/ RWAKABISHYA John, son of GAPFUNSI Male Chief of Village HC Asking a bribe of Imprisonment of 2
HC/RWG and NYANGORE, born in 1968, residence of RWAMAGA 20,000Rwf years and a fine of
Rumuli- Nyamugali- Nyamugali- Kirehe-East NA 100,000Rwf
7. RPA0053/14/H NKURUNZIZA Fred alias MAGURU, son Male Businessman HC Giving a bribe of
C/RWG of GATSINZI Faustin and KANTENGWA RWAMAGA 200,000Rwf
Imprisonment of 1
Stéphanie, born in 1978, residence of Barija- NA
year and 6 months
Nyagatare-Nyagatare- Nyagatare-East
8. RWAMBIBI Africana alias Firikano, son Male Farmer HC Giving a bribe of Imprisonment of 1
of Barusa and Nyirankesha, residence of MUSANZE 10,000Rwf year suspended in
RPA0379/13/H
Mbuga,- Bushenyi- Bungwe- Burera- North 1 year and a fine of
C/MUS
20,000 Rwf
9. RPA UWINGABO Intime, son of BASABOSE Male Businessman HC Giving a bribe of Imprisonment of
0340/13/HC/MU and SIBOMANA, residence of Rukereza- MUSANZE 20,000Rwf 1year and a fine of
S Kigombe- Muhoza-Musanze- North 54,000Rwf
11. RPA NDAYISHIMIYE Theophile, son of Male Farmer HC Giving a bribe of Imprisonment of 1
0437/13/HC/NY HAVUGIMANA Philippe and NIYOYITA NYANZA 22,000 Rwf year and a fine of
A Sidonie, residence of Nyarutovu- Rwinyana- 220,000Rwf
Bweramana- Ruhango-South
12. RPA 0067/14/ UWIMANIHAYE Célèstin, son of Male Farmer HC Giving a bribe of Imprisonment of 1
NTAKIRUTIMANA Augustin, residence of NYANZA 1,000 Rwf year and a fine of
HC/NYA
Bihembe- Nkakwa- Nyagisozi-Nyaruguru- 5,000Rwf
South
13. RPA 0062/12 SIBOMANA Olivier, son of Male Farmer HC Giving a bribe of Imprisonment of 2
MUJAWAMARIYA Ancille, residence of NYANZA 3,000Rwf years and a fine of
/HC/NYA
Gitima- Tyazo- Muhanga-Muhanga-South 15.000Rwf
14. RPA 0072/14 MBARUSHIMANA Viateur, son of Male Farmer HC Giving a bribe of Imprisonment of 3
NYAMUZIGA and BURUHUKIRO, NYANZA 30,000Rwf years
/HC/NYA
residence of Kivumu- Kigarama-Mwendo-
15. MANIZABAYO Jean Claude, son of Male Conductor TGI Giving a bribe of Imprisonment of 1
NZABAMBARIRWA Faustin and KAKUZE NGOMA 6,000Rwf year and a fine of
RP0830/13/TGI/
Clémentine, born in 1983, residence of 100,000Rwf
NGOMA
Mburabuturo- Mburabuturo-Mukarange-
Kayonza-East
16. RPA0031/14/TG SANGANO Florent, son of MBURANO Male Farmer TGI Giving a bribe of Imprisonment of 6
I/NYG Fabien and NYIRAKABANO Monique NYAGATA 50,000Rwf months and a fine
RE of 50,000Rwf
17. RP0536/13/TGI/ NZEYIMANA Théogène, son of Male Moto cyclist TGI Giving a bribe of Imprisonment of 1
GAKWAYA and MUHIMPUNDU Goretti, MUHANGA 5,000Rwf year and a fine of
MHG
born in 1989, residence of Gikoma-Ruhango-
10,000Rwf
Ruhango-South
18. RP0540/13/TGI/ MUKANYONGA Damrse, daughter of Female Farmer TGI Giving a bribe of Imprisonment of 1
MHG NGUGE Henock and GIRINKA Marthe, MUHANGA 50,000Rwf year and 6 months
residence of Kiruri-Mukingo-Nyanza-South suspended in 1
year and a fine of
16,000Rwf
20. RP0550/13/TGI RUKUNDO Janvier, son of NSABIMANA Male Driver TGI Giving a bribe of Imprisonment of
MHG Evariste and MUKAGASANA Alphonsine MUHANGA 5,000Rwf 1year and 6
months suspended
in 1 year
21. RP0396/13/ MUGIRANEZA Gratien, son of Male Moto cyclist TGI HUYE Giving a bribe of Imprisonment of 1
NDAGIJIMANA Jean and 10,000Rwf year and a fine of
TGI/HYE
NYIRANSABIMANA Anonciata, born in
50,000Rwf
1983, residence of Nyarunazi-Sabusa- Kansi-
Gisagara-South
22. RPA0201/13/ SEBUDANDI Vedaste, son of Male In charge of TGI HUYE Receiving Imprisonment of 6
NSABIMANA and NYIRABUGARE forestry in years and a fine of
TGI/HYE 50.000Frw
Anonciata, born in 1983, residence of Mbogo- Ntyazo and
150,000 Rwf
Gikondo- Gisagara-Soueth Kibirizi Sectors
23. RP0376/13/ TUYISENGE Egide, son of Male Moto cyclist TGI HUYE Giving a bribe of Imprisonment of 6
HAGUMUBUZIMA Joseph and
SEBUHUNGU Athanase, son of Male Moto cyclist TGI HUYE Giving a bribe of Imprisonment of 6
SEBUDANDI Claude and UZANINKA 15,000Rwf years and a fine of
Alvine born in 1984, residence of Rugwiza-
150,000Rwf
Gakoma-Mamba- Gisagara-South
24. RP0051/13/ DUSENGIMANA Jacqueline, son of Male Farmer TGI Giving a bribe of Imprisonment of 2
HANYURWIMFURA and MUKAGATARE, NYAMAGA 25,000Rwf years suspended in
TGI/NYBE
born in 1994, residence of Gicaca- BE 3 years and a fine
Mudasomwa- Tare- Nyamagabe- South of 50,000 Rwf
25. RP0227/13/TGI/ RUGIMBANA Anaclet, residence of Male Farmer TGI Giving a bribe Imprisonment of 1
MUS Mpinga-Shyira-Nyabihu-Western MUSANZE year and a fine of
20,000Rwf
26. RPA0223/13/TG KANEZA Alexis, son of KAZENEZA and Male Fisherman TGI RUSIZI Giving a bribe of Imprisonment of 2
I/RSZ SEBAGENI Sonia, born in 1988, residence of 38,000Rwf and years and a fine of
Ijwi -Kivu- Bukavu-RDC 25US$ 150,000Rwf
MUNGUYIKO Moise, son of MUSORO Male Fisherman TGI RUSIZI Giving a bribe of Imprisonment of 2