Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Design of Steel Structures N Subramaniam PDF
Design of Steel Structures N Subramaniam PDF
AEX <2" . _ Schwedler dome Guyed mast @ w Fig. 2.4 Examples of steel-frame structures (MacGinley 1997) (@ Tension structures, tensegritic and cable-supported (cable-suspended or cable- stayed) roof structures (Subramanian 1999). (c). In a stressed skin structure, where the cladding is also designed as a load- bearing member, thus stabilizing the structure, special shear connections are necessary; in order that the sheeting acts integrally with the main frames of the structure (Subramanian 1999), It is possible to reduce the cost by considering the stiffening effect of the sheeting. , (O) High-rise constructions: Tall buildings with more’than 20 storeys are often considered in large cities where land costs’are very high. In the design of such structures, the designer should pay attention to the system resisting the lateral loads (MacGinley 1999). Several interésting systems have been developed, and a few aré discussed in the next section. Table 2.1 summarizes the above structural systems and their design considera- ‘ions. ;The Basis of Structural Design 91 _ Table 2.1 Categories of main structural systems ‘Type of structure “Use and example ‘Main considerations in design Single-storey structures Low rise, lightly loaded, open-web’ Usually simple analysis and - joist, trusses design Steel frame Braced or rigid frame with wide Simple, rigid and semi-rigid variety oftypes _/ _.. connections will dictate. the complexity of design” Long span ‘Large column-free areas; double-" ‘Three-dimensional analysis and multilayer grids, domes, ete. and special connectors Tension “2! Lafgé spans, ‘stressed skin domes,’ “Proper connection between and folded plates the skin of the roof and the main load-bearing members High rise ‘Tall buildings having more than 20 Resistance to lateral forces storeys, framed tube, braced tube, tube in tube and bundled tube Ithas tobe noted that combinations with concrete (in the form of shear walls or floor slabs) are structurally important in many buildings. Ifadequate interconnection between the concrete slab and the steel beam is provided in buildings and bridges (in the form of shear connectors), the resulting system, called composite construc- tion, is both structurally and economically advantageous. Braced, rigid frame, truss roof, and space-deck construction are shown in Fig. 2.4 for comparison. Only framed structures. are discussed in detail in the book. Space structures, tension structures, stressed skin structures, and shell types, e.g., tanks, are not considered. Analysis, design, and construction aspects of space frames; tension structures, and stressed skin systems are available in Stibramanian (1999). Details of the design of composite constrictions are available in Kulak and Grondin (2002); Salmon and Johnson (1996), and Johnson (1994). : For frairied structures, the main elements are the beam, column, beam-column, tie, and lattice member. Beams are those elements which are subjected to bending moments, and shear forces only and columns are subjected to axial loads (tensile or compressive). Beam-columns are subjected to axial loads as well as bending moments. In some special cases, beams are subjected to torsional moments. Beams anid columns can be rolled or built-up H, box, or I. For long-span constructions, for example, to support the slab of a bridge, normal rolled sections may not have sufficient depth to act as beams. In such cases, deep welded plate girders, box girders, castellated girders, open-web joists or trusses may replace them. For very long spans, deep trusses or arches may be necessary. . Steel-framed buildings Most steel structures belong to the category of braced and rigid frame construction. They are suitable for large industrial buildings, commercial buildings, schools, or for multi-storey buildings, which can be office buildings, hospitals, or residential92 Design of Steel Structures buildings. They consist essentially of regularly spaced columns joined by beams or girders. Secondary beams span between these main beams and provide support to the concrete floor or roof sheeting. Depending on the type of beam-columnn connections employed, such systems may be classified as simple construction ot as continuous construction. y Simple construction In simple construction (see clause 4.2 and F-4 of the code), the ends of beams and girders are connected to transmit transverse shear only, and are free to rotate under load in the plane of bending, Hence hinged ends are assumed for the beams, Connections are usually made by welding plates or angles to a beam or column in-the fabricator’s shop and bolted at site to the connecting beam or column (see Fig. 2.5). I = a Clip and > Web cleats Curtailed end plate seating angle (single or double) (header plate) @ (o) ©) Fig. 2.5 Simpie beam to column connections These simple constructions are statically determinate and hence the beams are designed as simply supported and the. columns. are designed-for the axial loads (due to the reaction from the beams) and the moments produced by the eccentricity of the beam reactions as shown in Fig, 2.5(b). (A minimum distance of 100 mm from the face of the column is specified in the code clause 7.3.3.1.) In.such frames lateral forces due to the wind or earthquake are generally resisted by bracings {usually made of angles), forming vertical or horizontal trusses as required. The braced bays can be grouped around a central core, distributed around the perimeter of the building, or staggered through various elevations as shown in Fig. 2.6. The’ floors act as horizontal ‘diaphragms to transmit load to the braced bays. Bracing must be provided in two directions and all connections are taken as. pinned. ‘The bracing should be arranged to be symmetrical with respect to the building plan, to avoid twisting. The unbraced portion of the building frame in effect ‘leans’ on the braced portion to keep from falling over. In multi-storey buildings, reinforced concrete shear walls may replace the vertical steel bracing trusses. This type of construction is used in frames up to about five storeys. in height, where strength rather than stiffness governs the design Manual analysis can be used for the whole structure. Continuous construction or rigid framé structures Continuous construction (also called rigid frame structures) assume sufficient rigidity in the beam-columnThe Basis of Structural Design 93 Braced bays Fo Braced core: fa) * eo) Fig. 2.6 All-steel braced structures: (a) vertical bracing, (b) bracing on perimeter/ interior wails, and (c) bracing around core connections, such that under the action of loads the original angles between intersecting members are unchanged (see clause 4.2 and F4.2 of the code). Corinections are usually made in the fabticator’s shop as well as the site, by welding and bolting. The connections shown int Fig. 2.7 can be adopted in rigid frame construction, which transfer both shear and moment ftom beam to column. Fully _ Welded connections can also be considered as rigid beam-to-column connections. Such connections naturally involve additional fabrication and higher erection costs. However, the greater rigidity produced in the structure duc to ifs ability to develop flexural action results in reduced member sizes and the elimination of bracings. This form of construction js used for low-rise industrial buildings [Figs 2.4(a) and (©)] and for multi-storey buildings [Fig. 2. 8@)) gure Bags wen pt sa PAA (optional)... [} [ Th optionan LIL: . / Hd nt » Flush end-plate ©) - > Extended'end-plate Haunched end-plate en) she (b)- : 2 @) . Fig. 2.7-Rigid beam-to-column connections In rigid frame structures, bending in beams and columns resists horizontal load: The columns, particularly inthe. lower-storeys, must: resist .heavy.moments::So sections will be much larger than in braced buildings.94 Design of Steel Structures eo < | fa) a ® 82 =>|k— K-35 | ks JT 4 Pins SL | Tom ee oo @ Fig. 2.8. Continuous.construction systems: (a) rigid frame, (b) rigid frame with _ bracing, (cantilever deflection, and (8 rigid frame deflection The frame normally'has Hesection c6limns. It is rigid in one direction only, across the short span, and’is braced longitudinally. As mentioned previously, the coutiections are expensive, being welded or je with beam ends with hausiches and high-strength bolts. Frames. Tigid in both ‘directions with box-section ‘columns have béen constnicted in areas subjéct to scismic loads (MacGinley 1997). ‘The rigid frame structure deflects more than a braced structure. The deflection is made up of sway in cach storey plus overall cantilever action. Due to excessive deflection, rigid frames are suitable only for low- or medium-rise buildings (up to about 15 floors). ‘The interaction between adjacent members present in continuous construction necessitates the consideration of at least a group of interconnected members together for analysis. Since such subframes are satically indeterminate, they require several cycles of design. Computer programs are often used to analyse such rigid frames. Frame with semi-rigid connections Semi-rigid conncctions fall between simple and rigid connections. As a matter of fact, any connection that is adopted in practice will be a semi-rigid connection. This is-because simple connections:as shown in Fig. 2.5 do have some degree of rotational rigidity and rigid connections as shown in Fig. 2.7 also experience some degree- of joint deformation. Hence, before analysing the frame, the moment-rotation characteristic of the adopted connection has to be established by a rational method or based on experiments (clause 4.2.1.2 of the code). In Appendix F, the code givés some recommendations for obtainingThe Basis of Structural Design 95 the moment-curvature relationship of single web-angle connections, double web- angle connections, top and seat angle connections (without double web-angle : connec-tions), and header plate connections. These: connections’are shown in Fig. 2.9. Computer programs are available for the analysis of frames with semi- rigid connections (Chen ef al. 1995). Research is still being done on semi-rigid connections. See Chapter 4 for more details of their analysis. In practice, most connections are either assumed as simple connections or rigid connections only. : ojun Column Cohan Angle Beam (pea +) i 1 i+] Single web angle + Single pate @ © Cota Column Column Column ‘ ‘Top Angle ¥ angle Beam Le = : 4 F. \ seatangie 4 + Double: web-angle ‘Top and seat angles with double wab angle © @, Column Column *TT. Top angie * Beam z+ - 44 \ seat Angle 4 ‘Top and seat angles, (eo)96 Design of Steel Structures ojurnn Cojume Column jum Bean Beam pa == Pail = =| at 3] pales Piste _ fxPiae Extended end plate on the tension side only Extended end plate an both sides © (9) oly Column Column. ‘Coturnn + Beain Beam — bala $F + RE ++ $+ Plate 1 * Flush end plate Header plate 6) 0 Fig. 2.9 Examples of semi-rigid connections Mixed systems A mixed braced frame/rigid frame structure as shown in Fig. 2.8(b) can also be adopted to reduce horizontal deflections. (Such structures are coinmon in reinforced concrete constructions, where’ the shear wall is combined with a concrete'rigid frame.) The different modes of deflection for the cantilever/core/braced bay and rigid frame sway are shown in the Figs 2.8(c) and (d). Staggered lattice girder system This system, developed in the USA and shown in Fig. 2.10, is useful for long narrow buildings with a.central corridor, e.g., hotels, classrooms, or offices. Storey-deep lattice girders, staggered on adjacent floors, span between wall columns, as shown in the figure. Lateral loads can be resisted in two ways: (a) by end-braced bays with floors acting as rigid diaphragms, and (b) by rigid frame action in the transverse frames. Tn the longitudinal direction, braced bays on the outside walls or shear walls at lift shafts/stairwells provide stability. Composite structures Such structures can be of two kinds—concrete core structures, and concrete shear wall structures. Concrete shear wall structures The composite steel-shear wall structure consists of a sieel-framed building braced with vertical reinforced concrete shear walls, as shown in Fig. 2.11, The shear walls placed in two directions at right angles carry vertical and horizontal loads. The shear walls replace the braced bays in the all- steel building.‘The Basis of Structural Design 97 «40 a°3 . Lattice girder above Braced /-— bay Lattice girder below Room plan <<