You are on page 1of 11

AACN Advanced Critical Care

Volume 27, Number 1, pp. 29-39


© 2016 AACN

Risk Factors and Outcomes Associated


With Readmission to the Intensive
Care Unit After Cardiac Surgery
Young Ae Kang, RN, MSN, CCN, CNS

ABSTRACT
Unplanned readmission to the intensive care mechanical ventilation time, new-onset
unit (ICU) is associated with poor prognosis, arrhythmia, unplanned reoperation, massive
longer hospital stay, increased costs, and blood transfusion, prolonged inotropic infu-
higher mortality rate. In this retrospective sions, and complications. Other factors were
study, involving 1368 patients, the risk factors high blood glucose level, hemoglobin level,
for and outcomes of ICU readmission after and score on the Acute Physiology and Chronic
cardiac surgery were analyzed. The readmis- Health Evaluation II. In-hospital stay was
sion rate was 5.9%, and the most common longer and late mortality was higher in the
reason for readmission was cardiac issues. readmitted group. These data could help
Preoperative risk factors were comorbid con- clinical practitioners create improved ICU
ditions, mechanical ventilation, and admis- discharge protocols or treatment algorithms
sion route. Perioperative risk factors were to reduce length of stay or to reduce
nonelective surgery, duration of cardiopul- readmissions.
monary bypass, and longer operation time. Keywords: readmission, cardiac surgery,
Postoperative risk factors were prolonged intensive care unit, risk factor

T o accommodate greater consumer interest


in the quality of medical services that has
resulted from the changing medical market-
after previous discharge, is one of the indica-
tors of health care quality and effectiveness.2
Unplanned ICU readmissions may reflect
place and higher incomes, the US Department insufficient treatment of patients during the
of Health and Human Services has begun previous ICU episode or premature discharge.2
efforts to improve health care by evaluating However, ICU readmission has been more
the quality of health care services offered by associated with patients’ characteristics and
hospitals. Performance indicators that can be in particular with illness severity than with
used to directly assess the outcomes of health the quality of treatment.3 Given the effect of
care services, such as mortality, morbidity, an ICU readmission on patients, unplanned
incidence of sequelae, and reutilization of readmissions can be an important indicator
services, are useful general measures. These of health care quality.1 Moreover, ICU read-
objective indicators may be effectively used to mission is highly related to mortality and
evaluate treatment outcomes quantitatively
and are thus considered useful measures of
health care quality and effectiveness.1 Young Ae Kang is Clinical Nurse Specialist, Cardiovascular
Surgery ICU, Asan Medical Center, 88, Olympic-ro, 43-gil,
According to the Quality Indicators Com- Songpa-gu, Seoul, 138-736, Korea (duddo75@gmail.com).
mittee of the Society of Critical Care Medicine,
intensive care unit (ICU) readmission, which The author declares no conflicts of interest.
is an unplanned admission within 48 hours DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4037/aacnacc2016451

29
KA NG W W W.A ACNACCONLINE .ORG

morbidity,4 and when patients are readmitted, factors such as underlying condition, age,
the increased length of stay due to the patient’s and disease severity.8,14,15 Most patients were
worsening illness increases overall health readmitted to the ICU because of hemodynamic
care costs. problems such as respiratory and cardiac
ICU treatment is reportedly 3 times more insufficiency, and the duration of mechanical
expensive than is care in general patient care ventilation during the initial ICU admission
units.5 To shorten the ICU hospitalization was longer in readmitted patients.4,15
period, protocols that include initiatives such Several Korean studies have addressed ICU
as early extubation have been developed and readmission, and most of the previous studies
executed.6 However, readmission rates are targeted patients in integrated ICUs. In a few
growing along with an increased incidence international studies, researchers compared
of reintubations and complications, draw- ICU readmission in patients who had under-
ing focused attention to the problems associ- gone cardiac surgery with readmission rates of
ated with potential premature discharge all ICU patients. Therefore, an assessment of
from the ICU.7 the prognosis and readmission-related factors
according to diseases and departments in large
Background hospitals equipped with specialized ICUs
Most patients who undergo cardiac surgery could help to target interventions in subsets
receive immediate postoperative care in the ICU of patients at risk for readmission and to cre-
without being transferred to a post­anesthesia ate decision algorithms for optimal ICU dis-
recovery room.8 Upon discharge from the ICU, charge time. Furthermore, the rate of premature
they are transferred to general care units, where ICU discharge could potentially be decreased.
the patients may be exposed to a treatment By targeting patients who underwent car-
environment that is less than optimal to address diac surgery, the present study was intended
the complex needs of patients recovering from to help decrease ICU readmissions by analyz-
cardiac surgery. In general patient care units ing the factors associated with unplanned
where patients cannot be intensively monitored, ICU readmission and patients’ prognosis,
it may not be possible to rapidly detect changes particularly to clarify patients’ predischarge
in the patient’s condition or to implement risk factors. In addition, a secondary purpose
early treatment appropriate to the patient’s of this study was to lay a foundation for the
status. Accordingly, readmission to the ICU optimal assessment of patients’ status before
from general care units is always a possibility. ICU discharge for future use in establishing
Unplanned ICU admission is an unfortu- standardized protocols for determining the
nate experience for both patients and their appropriate ICU discharge time for cardiac
families. Most patients who are readmitted surgical patients.
to the ICU with deteriorating health have a
poor prognosis,9 require more time and Methods
effort from medical teams,10 and show sig- Design
nificantly higher in-hospital mortality and This retrospective observational cohort study
longer hospital stays than patients admitted was done to analyze the risk factors associated
for the first time.11 with unplanned ICU readmission after car-
Most patients are readmitted to the ICU diac surgery and patients’ prognosis. This study
because they require intensive care.12 How- was approved by the institutional review board
ever, Nishi et al13 reported that 20.8% of the of Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea, and
readmitted patients in a surgical ICU would permitted by the relevant medical department.
not have been readmitted if they had received
proper treatment after a previous discharge and Study Population
that 4.6% were readmitted because of prema- Ultimately, the present study included
ture discharge. Thus, ICU readmission could be 1368 patients who had undergone cardiac
prevented or reduced if the factors associated surgery and were hospitalized in the cardio-
with ICU readmission were identified and the vascular surgery ICU of a tertiary hospital
discharge time more appropriately determined. in Seoul, Korea, between January 1, 2012,
Researchers in previous studies have and June 30, 2013.
reported that readmissions to the ICU after ICU readmission was defined as readmission
a previous discharge were associated with of a patient to the same ICU after discharge

30
VOLU ME 27 • N U MB ER 1 • JANUARY-M ARCH 2016 ICU RE A D M ISSION A FT E R CA RD IAC SURGE RY

All patients admitted to cardiovascular


surgery intensive care unit
Enrollment

(n = 1520)

Excluded
Not meeting inclusion criteria
(n = 148)
Included
(n = 1372)

Nonreadmitted group Readmitted group


(n = 1287) (n = 85)
Excluded
Planned readmissions
Analysis

due to staged operations


Nonreadmitted group Unplanned readmitted group during same hospitalization
(n = 1287) (n = 81) (n = 4)

Figure 1: Enrollment flow diagram.

to a general care unit during the same hospi- CABG surgery was performed in 29.6%, valve
talization.1,10,11,16 Patients who were unexpect- surgery in 40.6%, aorta surgery in 11.2%,
edly readmitted to the cardiovascular surgery and combined surgery (CABG/valve surgery,
ICU because of a deterioration or change in CABG/aorta surgery) in 4.7%. The remaining
their condition were included in the analyses operations included heart transplant, pulmo-
as “readmitted.” nary thromboembolectomy, cardiac myxoma
All selected patients were older than 18 excision, and congenital heart disease repair.
years and had been admitted to the ICU after
major cardiac surgery during the specified Data Collection
study time frame, including all surgeries that Data were collected from the electronic
involved cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), medical records by using a standardized form
off-pump coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), designed by the author. The preoperative
and pericardectomy without CPB. The exclu- clinical information of patients included ICU
sion criteria were as follows: (1) patients admission routes, diagnoses, type of operation,
whose readmission length of stay was less preoperative arrhythmia, ejection fraction,
than 4 hours, (2) patients who died in the urgency of operation (elective or emergent),
ICU during treatment or were transferred to operation time, and CPB time. Postoperative
another hospital, and (3) patients transferred information included mechanical ventilation
to a different ICU to have continuous treat- time, infusion time of inotropic drugs, new-
ment for a noncardiac illness after cardiac onset arrhythmia, newly developed compli-
surgery. Patients readmitted to the ICU at cations, new implantation of cardiac support
different times of the study period because devices, and blood transfusion. Laboratory
of sequential surgery or treatments were also data, scores on the Acute Physiology and
included because they were regarded as indi- Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II,
vidual hospitalization cases, in accordance and support drugs or devices at the time of
with the above inclusion and exclusion crite- ICU discharge also were examined.
ria. The flow diagram describing selection
of study participants is presented in Figure 1, Statistical Analysis
and the general characteristics of participants Data were analyzed by using IBM SPSS
are listed in Table 1. 20.0 in both univariate and multivariate
Of the 1368 patients, 806 (58.9%) were models. Continuous data are presented as
male, and the mean age was 58.7 (SD, 13.3) mean (SD) or median (interquartile range
years. A total of 134 patients (9.8%) had a [IQR]), and categorical data are presented as
history of 2 or more cardiac surgeries, and a number (percentage). Logistic regression test-
previous cardiac problem was seen in 24.0%. ing was used to analyze risk factors

31
KA NG W W W.A ACNACCONLINE .ORG

Table 1: General Characteristics of the Table 2: Clinical and Therapeutic Charac-


Study Patients (N = 1368) teristics of the Study Patients (N = 1368)
a a
Characteristic Value Characteristic Value
Age, mean (SD), y 58.7 (13.3) Preoperative ejection fraction, 55.6 (12.9)
mean (SD), %
Sex
Male 806 (58.9) Preoperative arrhythmia 320 (23.4)
Female 562 (41.1)
Preoperative device
Body surface area, mean (SD), m2 1.69 (0.19) Ventilator 25 (1.8)
IABP, ECMO 22 (1.6)
Diabetes mellitus 311 (22.7)
Admission route
Hypertension 554 (40.5)
General care area 1206 (88.2)
Drinking 466 (34.1) ICU/ER 162 (11.8)
Smoking Surgery type
Current 280 (20.5) Elective 1151 (84.1)
Former 313 (22.9) Emergency 217 (15.9)
ICU admission history 426 (31.1) Operation time, mean (SD), h 4.8 (1.6)
Cardiac surgery history 134 (9.8) CPB
Operation with CPB use 1042 (76.2)
Comorbid condition
CPB time, mean (SD), min 148 (67.3)
Cardiac problems 329 (24.0)
Cerebrovascular disease 142 (10.4) Mechanical ventilation time, 10.0 (1.6-8050.2)
Respiratory disease 78 (5.7) median (IQR), h
Azotemia 94 (6.9)
Inotropic drugs
ESRD or hemodialysis 24 (1.8)
Patients receiving 944 (69)
Cancer 54 (3.9)
Infusion time, median (IQR), h 38 (0.2-932.1)
Surgery classification
Cardiac device support
CABG 405 (29.6)
IABP, ECMO 36 (2.6)
Valve surgery 556 (40.6)
Pacemaker 235 (17.2)
Aorta surgery 153 (11.2)
Combined surgery 64 (4.7) New-onset arrhythmia 553 (40.4)
Heart transplant 62 (4.5)
ICU events
Other 128 (9.4)
Reoperation 58 (4.2)
CPCR 13 (1.0)
Abbreviations: CABG, coronary artery bypass graft; ESRD, end-stage
renal disease; ICU, intensive care unit. Complication
a
Values are number (percentage) of patients unless otherwise speci- Cardiac 79 (5.8)
fied in first column.
Cerebrovascular 58 (4.2)
Respiratory 46 (3.4)
associated with unplanned readmission. The Bleeding 152 (11.1)
nonreadmission and readmission groups were New-onset CRRT or HD 23 (2.6)
compared by using c2 and Fisher exact tests. Abbreviations: CPB, cardiopulmonary bypass; CPCR, cardiopulmonary
A P value of .05 or less was considered statis- cerebral resuscitation; CRRT, continuous renal replacement therapy;
ECMO, extracorporeal membrane oxygenator; ER, emergency room;
tically significant. HD, hemodialysis; IABP, intra-aortic balloon pump; ICU, intensive
care unit; IQR, interquartile range.

Results
a
Values are number (percentage) of patients unless otherwise specified
in first column.
Clinical and Therapeutic
Characteristics of the Study Patients
Clinical and therapeutic characteristics of care. Two hundred seventeen patients (15.9%)
the study participants are listed in Table 2. had emergent or urgent surgery, and the mean
Briefly, 11.8% of patients were admitted via operation time was 4.8 (SD, 1.6) hours. CPB
the ICU or emergency department, preopera- was used in 76.2% of patients, and the mean
tive arrhythmias were seen in 23.4% of CPB time was 148 (SD, 67.3) minutes.
patients, and 1.8% of patients required During postoperative care, the median
mechanical ventilation during preoperative duration of mechanical ventilation was 10

32
VOLU ME 27 • N U MB ER 1 • JANUARY-M ARCH 2016 ICU RE A D M ISSION A FT E R CA RD IAC SURGE RY

Table 3: Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients Readmitted to the Intensive Care


Unit (n = 81)

Valuea
Characteristic Readmission No readmission χ2 and P
Reason for readmission
Cardiac 42 (51.9)
Respiratory 11 (13.6)
Cerebrovascular 4 (4.9)
Gastrointestinal 3 (3.7)
Sepsis 4 (4.9)
Reoperation 8 (9.9)
Wound infection 9 (11.1)
Time interval between readmission 172.3 (10.8-1306.5)
and ICU discharge, median (IQR), h
≤ 72 h 17 (21.0)
72 h-7 d 20 (24.7)
7-14 d 10 (12.3)
14-21 d 27 (33.3)
21-28 d 4 (4.9)
> 28 d 3 (3.7)
Second ICU LOS, median (IQR), h 43.9 (8.3-1288.4)
Third readmission 9 (11.1)
Hospital mortality 5 (6.2)
First ICU LOS, median (IQR), h 70.2 (17.9-948.4) 46.2 (4.2-8103.8) < .001
Total hospital stay, median (IQR), d 32 (6-273) 9 (3-172) < .001
Late mortality 18 (22.2) 41 (3.2) 66.916 (< .001b)

Abbreviations: ICU, intensive care unit; IQR, interquartile range; LOS, length of stay.
a
Values are number (percentage) of patients unless otherwise specified in first column.
b
Fisher exact test.

hours (IQR, 1.6-8050.2 hours), the median unplanned readmission rate of 5.9%. Nine
infusion time for inotropic drugs was 38 hours patients underwent a third readmission dur-
(IQR, 0.2-932.1), and 69% of patients received ing their hospitalization. Of these 81 patients,
inotropic drugs. Temporary or continuous readmission for cardiac causes occurred in 42
arrhythmia was newly diagnosed in 553 patients (51.9%); in 26 of these 42 patients,
patients (40.4%). The major postoperative the readmission was due to cardiac arrhythmia;
complication was bleeding (11.1%), defined 14 of these 26 patients required implanted
as chest tube drainage after ICU admission of permanent pacemakers. Eight patients were
greater than 200 mL/h, for more than 3 hours. in a low cardiac output state. Eleven patients
Cardiac problems such as a low cardiac out- were readmitted because of respiratory prob-
put state or arrhythmia occurred in 5.8% of lems resulting from oxygen desaturation or
cases, respiratory complications such as failed ineffective expectoration of secretions. Com-
mechanical ventilator weaning or pneumonia plications included wound infection (11.1%),
occurred in 3.4%, and new-onset hemodialy- reoperation (9.9%), cerebrovascular problems
sis occurred in 2.6% of the patients. (4.9%), sepsis (4.9%), and gastrointestinal
complications (3.7%).
Readmission Outcomes The median time interval between ICU
Readmission characteristics and outcomes discharge and readmission was 172.3 hours
are presented in Table 3. Of the 1368 patients (IQR, 10.8-1306.5), and 17 patients were
included in the study series, 81 patients were readmitted within 72 hours: 8 because of car-
readmitted to the ICU, resulting in a calculated diac problems, 4 because of cerebrovascular

33
KA NG W W W.A ACNACCONLINE .ORG

25 hours of CPB (RR, 1.95; 95% CI, 1.05-3.63;


P = .04).
20
During the postoperative course, duration
No. of patients

15
of mechanical ventilation exceeding 10 hours
(RR, 2.54; 95% CI, 1.56-4.14; P < .001),
10
new-onset arrhythmia (RR, 2.66; 95% CI,
1.67-4.20, P < .001), unplanned reoperation
5
during ICU admission (RR, 4.15; 95% CI,
0.64-13.48; P < .001), and newly developed
0
postoperative complications were strong risk
<72
hours
72 hours-
7 days
7-14
days
14-21
days
21-28
days
> 28
days
factors for ICU readmission. Infusion of ino-
Time interval tropic drugs for more than 24 hours was
another risk factor, in particular, dobutamine
Wound infection Reoperation infusion exceeding 10 µg/kg per minute (RR,
Sepsis Gastrointestinal 1.16; 95% CI, 1.04-1.29; P = .007). Massive
Cerebrovascular Respiratory transfusion of more than 20 units of blood
Cardiac was another risk factor.
In laboratory testing during admission, the
Figure 2: Causes of readmission according to the blood glucose level, concentration of C-reactive
time interval (n = 81). protein (CRP), hemoglobin level less than 8
g/dL, and the alanine aminotransferase level
complications, and 3 because of respiratory were significantly related to readmission. In
problems. addition, the APACHE II score on the day
Five patients (6.2%) died during hospitali- of discharge to a general care unit was asso-
zation. The in-hospital stay of readmitted ciated with ICU readmission (Table 4).
patients was significantly longer than that
of nonreadmitted patients (32 days [6-273] Multivariate Analysis of
vs 9 days [3-172], P < .001). Late mortality Risk Factors for Readmission
was significantly higher in the readmission Because multivariate analysis would not
group than in the nonreadmission group have been useful for analyzing the few patients
(22.2% vs 3.2%, P < .001). who were readmitted, the variables were
Thirty-seven patients (45.7%) were read- analyzed by subdividing the reasons for ICU
mitted within 7 days after ICU discharge, and readmission into cardiac, respiratory, and
22 patients of these patients were readmitted infectious causes. Thus, 43 patients were read-
because of cardiac problems: 13 patients had mitted because of cardiac problems, including
arrhythmias and 8 patients were in a low a low cardiac output state, arrhythmia, and
cardiac output state. Furthermore, 13 patients ischemic colitis resulting from poor circulation
with wound problems or sepsis were readmit- caused by severe hypotension; 12 patients
ted after 7 days. Causes of readmission accord- were readmitted because of respiratory prob-
ing to the time interval are shown in Figure 2. lems, including oxygen desaturation, pneumo-
nia, and tracheoesophageal fistula; and 14
Univariate Analysis of patients were readmitted for infectious causes,
Risk Factors for Readmission including surgical wound infection and sepsis.
Preoperative factors univariately associated With regard to readmission due to cardiac
with risk of ICU readmission after cardiac problems, nonelective surgery (odds ratio
surgery included comorbid conditions such [OR], 2.42; 95% CI, 1.14-5.14; P = .02),
as cardiac problems, respiratory diseases, new-onset arrhythmia after surgery (OR, 3.73;
and chronic kidney diseases such as end-stage 95% CI, 1.75-7.98; P = .001), development
renal disease; preoperative mechanical venti- of cardiac complication (OR, 4.29; 95% CI,
lator care; and admission from another ICU. 1.76-10.46; P = .001), and the APACHE II
Surgery-related risk factors included emer- score on the day of discharge to the general
gent or urgent surgery (relative risk [RR], care area (OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.00-1.19;
1.95; 95% CI, 1.16-3.28; P = .01), more than P = .04) were significant risk factors.
5 hours of operation time (RR, 1.65; 95% The risk factors for readmission due to
CI, 1.05-2.58; P = .03), and more than 3 respiratory problems were respiratory

34
VOLU ME 27 • N U MB ER 1 • JANUARY-M ARCH 2016 ICU RE A D M ISSION A FT E R CA RD IAC SURGE RY

Table 4: Univariate Analysis of Risk Factors for Readmission to the Intensive Care Unit

Characteristic Relative Risk 95% CI P


Age ≥ 60 y 1.35 0.86-2.13 .19
Sex 0.88 0.56-1.40 .60
2
Body surface area, m
<1.6 0.94 0.58-1.52 .79
>1.9 0.68 0.30-1.53 .35
Diabetes mellitus 1.20 0.72-2.01 .48
Hypertension 1.32 0.84-2.07 .23
Smoking 0.05 0.87-2.14 <.001
Alcohol 0.06 0.90-1.72 <.001
Comorbid condition
Cardiac problems 1.63 1.01-2.63 .046
Cerebrovascular disease 1.39 0.72-2.69 .33
Respiratory disease 3.59 1.89-6.84 <.001
CKD with oliguria 2.56 1.33-4.91 .005
ESRD 4.39 1.60-12.08 .004
Preoperative arrhythmia 0.05 1.12-2.90 <.001
Preoperative ejection fraction, % 0.99 0.97-1.01 .99
Preoperative device
Ventilator 6.66 2.70-16.46 <.001
IABP 2.15 0.48-9.55 .32
ECMO 2.28 0.28-18.78 .44
Admission route, ICU 2.95 1.70-5.10 <.001
Cardiac surgery history 0.06 0.99-3.43 <.001
Surgery type, emergent 1.95 1.16-3.28 .01
CPB time, min
< 180 0.83 0.46-1.48 .52
≥ 180 1.95 1.05-3.63 .04
Operative time ≥ 5 h 1.65 1.05-2.58 .03
Mechanical ventilation time ≥ 10 h 2.54 1.56-4.14 <.001
Inotropic drug infusion time, h
24-71.9 1.82 1.05-3.17 .03
≥ 72 3.88 2.20-6.85 <.001
Maximum medication dose, µg/kg per min
Dopamine ≥ 10 1.73 0.94-3.18 .08
Norepinephrine ≥ 0.2 1.9 0.91-3.99 .09
Dobutamine ≥ 10 1.16 1.04-1.29 .007
Epinephrine ≥ 0.2 1.52 0.64-3.63 .34

Postoperative new-onset arrhythmia 2.66 1.67-4.20 <.001


ICU events
Reoperation 4.15 0.64-13.48 <.001
Reintubation 2.42 0.83-7.10 .11
Units of blood products transfused in ICU
> 5 but ≤ 20 1.12 0.63-2.00 .71
> 20 but ≤ 50 2.83 1.33-6.02 .007
> 50 4.7 1.61-13.73 .005
Continued
35
KA NG W W W.A ACNACCONLINE .ORG

Table 4: Univariate Analysis of Risk Factors for Readmission to the Intensive Care Unit
(Continued)

Characteristic Relative Risk 95% CI P


Postoperative complication
Cerebrovascular 2.86 1.17-7.02 .02
Respiratory 6.41 3.18-12.92 < .001
Cardiac 6.82 3.87-12.05 < .001
Bleeding 1.91 1.06-3.44 .03
Azotemia 2.45 1.33-4.52 .004
New-onset CRRT or HD 4.82 1.89-12.31 .001
Laboratory data
Maximum blood glucose ≥ 200 mg/dL 2.08 1.32-3.29 .002
Minimum blood glucose < 80 mg/dL 5.2 3.28-8.22 < .001
White blood cell count ≥ 20 000/µL 0.92 0.33-2.58 .87
Hemoglobin level, g/dL
≥ 8 but < 10 1.82 1.14-2.91 .01
< 8 10.00 2.43-41.23 .001
CRP, mg/dL
≥ 5 but < 15 2.54 1.36-4.78 .004
≥ 15 1.27 0.77-2.10 .35
AST ≥ 100 IU/L 1.07 0.58-1.98 .83
ALT ≥ 100 IU/L 2.98 1.46-6.09 .003
Total bilirubin ≥ 10 mg/dL  2.32 0.68-7.94 .18
APACHE II score 1.18 1.12-1.25 < .001

Abbreviations: ALT, alanine aminotransferase; APACHE, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation; AST, aspartate aminotransferase;
CKD, chronic kidney disease; CPB, cardiopulmonary bypass; CPCR, cardiopulmonary cerebral resuscitation; CRP, C-reactive protein; CRRT, con-
tinuous renal replace therapy; DM, diabetes mellitus; ECMO, extracorporeal membrane oxygenator; ESRD, end-stage renal disease; HD, hemo-
dialysis; IABP, intra-aortic balloon pump; ICU, intensive care unit.

complications, unplanned reoperation during would have needed vigilant monitoring even
ICU admission, maximum blood glucose if transferred to general care units.
level, and concentration of CRP. The timing of ICU discharge of patients to
Statistically significant infection-related a general care unit should be determined by a
risk factors were preoperative pulmonary medical team. Some premature ICU discharges
comorbidity, new-onset hemodialysis, and are inevitable and lead to the requirement of
maximum blood glucose level (Table 5). more intensive monitoring in the general
care area. To handle the potential for patient
Discussion decompensation in situations where they may
In the present study, 81 patients out of a have been prematurely discharged from the
study population of 1368 experienced ICU, general care units should be equipped
unplanned ICU readmission. This readmis- with monitoring systems, as in intermediate
sion rate of 5.9% is lower than the rates care units, but this type of monitoring system
reported in previous studies.9,11 The difference is not widely used in general care units in
in readmission rates was most likely because Korea’s health care environment because of
the previous studies were conducted on patients its high costs. Professional staff would also
readmitted to a medical or surgical ICU within need to be trained in the use of this equipment.
a mean of 7 days following a previous dis-
charge, whereas the current study selected a Overall Risk Factors
single ICU. In the current patient series, 17 Badawi and Breslow17 considered diagnosis
patients (1.2% of the total population) were (including whether the patient had undergone
readmitted within 7 days. Of these 17 patients, elective or emergent surgery), admission source,
5 received inotropic drugs, 9 had received age, body mass index, and severity of illness
oxygen supplementation, and 7 had received to be risk factors predictive of ICU readmis-
temporary pacemakers. All of these patients sion or death after discharge. In the present

36
VOLU ME 27 • N U MB ER 1 • JANUARY-M ARCH 2016 ICU RE A D M ISSION A FT E R CA RD IAC SURGE RY

Table 5: Multivariate Analysis of Risk Factors for Readmission to Intensive Care Unit

Cause of Readmission Variable Adjusted Odds Ratio 95% CI P


Cardiac Nonelective surgery 2.42 1.14-5.14 .02
New-onset arrhythmias 3.73 1.75-7.98 .001
Cardiac complications 4.29 1.76-10.46 .001
APACHE II score 1.09 1.00-1.19 .04
Respiratory Respiratory complications 2.76 2.12-76.96 .005
Reoperation for ICU days 8.40 1.44-48.87 .02
Maximum blood glucose level 1.01 1.00-1.02 .03
C-reactive protein level 1.10 1.00-1.21 .04
Infectious Pulmonary comorbid condition 12.56 2.63-60.08 .002
New-onset hemodialysis 76.38 10.00-583.43 < .001
Maximum blood glucose level 1.01 1.00-1.02 .02

Abbreviations: APACHE, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation; ICU, intensive care unit.

study, however, body surface area and age In contrast, Benetis et al22 considered arrhyth-
were not significant risk factors. This differ- mia and ejection fraction to be preoperative
ence may be because the previous study risk factors for readmission in a study of
investigated various ICUs in multiple hospi- patients who had undergone cardiac surgery.
tals, whereas we selected patients in a single The intraoperative risk factors included
ICU of a single hospital, and our patients length of operation, emergent surgery, and
with heart valve disease or congenital cardiac CPB time; postoperative risk factors were
diseases were mostly young. On the other arrhythmia, respiratory failure, gastrointes-
hand, the admission source and illness were tinal disorders (including bleeding), cardio-
significant risk factors in this study. pulmonary resuscitation, renal insufficiency,
In a meta-analysis, Frost and colleagues18 hemodynamic instability, and sepsis.4,22,23
found a higher severity-of-illness score in The major causes of readmissions were in
patients readmitted to the ICU. The hospital accordance with the present findings in
in the present study has used the APACHE II many ways.
score to evaluate illness severity, but severity
is generally assessed only on certain days, Bleeding
such as on postoperative days 1, 3, and 7, Postoperative bleeding and surgical reex-
and its accurate assessment is vital because ploration were also postoperative predictors
of variations among medical teams. Zimmer- of ICU readmission in a study by Litmathe
man19 asserted that no severity tool could be and colleagues4 and, in the current study, 42
used to evaluate the risks of ICU readmission patients required emergency surgery because
and predict emergent situations occurring in of surgery-related bleeding, accounting for
general care units. Ball and colleagues20 72.4% of total unexpected reoperations.
highlighted the need for continuous follow- Salpeter et al24 reported decreases in com-
up of patients by critical care staff after ICU plications, rebleeding, infection, and mortality
discharge. However, more accurate tools for following blood transfusion restrictions in
evaluation of illness severity need to be critically ill patients and patients with bleed-
developed to detect high-risk patients who ing, and earlier, Surgenor et al25 reported that
are likely to be readmitted to the ICU from red blood cell transfusion after CABG was
a general care unit that lacks monitoring highly related to the use of cardiac devices
systems, and the appropriate use of severity- such as intra-aortic balloon pumps, reinstitu-
of-illness scoring systems is necessary, even tion of CPB after weaning in the operating
for general care units. room, and infusion of inotropic drugs for
Lai et al21 reported ischemic heart disease, more than 48 hours during the recovery
respiratory failure, pneumonia, cerebrovascu- process. Likewise, the present study showed a
lar diseases, and sepsis as the major causes strong link between blood transfusions and
of readmission in a study of multiple ICUs. ICU readmission.

37
KA NG W W W.A ACNACCONLINE .ORG

Blood Glucose to receive treatment in the optimal environ-


Blood glucose level was significantly asso- ment, and premature discharge from the ICU
ciated with ICU readmission. In particular, should be prevented. Detection of patients
multivariate analysis categorizing readmissions with problems and rapid responses to these
into cardiac, respiratory, and infectious causes cases are required even after the patients are
showed that blood glucose level was signifi- transferred to general care units. This is done
cantly related to readmissions, suggesting the through monitoring of the patient’s clinical
importance of controlling blood glucose level status to prevent deterioration and enable
after surgery. Lee et al26 reported a correlation speedy recovery, thus reducing the length of
between the highest blood glucose level and the hospital stay.
patients’ readmission within 30 days. Through this study, risk factors for
unplanned ICU readmission at our institu-
Mortality and Length of Stay tion were identified and provide us with a
The in-hospital mortality of the present foundation of evidence upon which to develop
study’s readmission group was 6.2%, with and test decision algorithms for determination
the late mortality rate of the readmission group of appropriate discharge time. ICU readmis-
being much higher than that of the nonread- sions have contributed to increased duration
mission group (22.2% vs 3.2%). The result of hospitalization, which also affects rehabili-
was consistent with that of many previous tation of critically ill patients after discharge
studies.4,11,21,27 Unplanned ICU readmission was from hospital. Replicated inquiry about ICU
related to poor patient prognosis and, to pre- readmissions will clarify discrete and optimal
vent unplanned readmissions, early detection therapeutic decisions for patients at high risk
of “flagged” patient variables is critical for for ICU readmission, and treatment planning
patients’ recovery and prognosis. Also, in the about their rehabilitation during hospitaliza-
present study, the length of hospital stay of the tion will have to be considered.
readmission group was 32 days, longer than
the 9 days in the nonreadmission group, which Limitations
was also consistent with previous results.3,4,22 The outcomes of this study involved patients
The length of ICU stay and the total hospitali- in just 1 ICU for a short period, and the
zation period were highly correlated in the factors found to be significant in univariate
work of Kramer and Zimmerman,28 reflecting analysis were not significant in multivariate
a patient’s diagnosis and the need for treat- analysis owing to the small number of patients
ment. However, in the present study, the length readmitted. It is recommended that future
of the first ICU readmission was 70.2 hours research be conducted to replicate our find-
(IQR, 17.9-948.4 hours), longer than the ings, using larger populations of patients after
46.2 hours (IQR, 4.2-8103.8 hours) of the cardiac surgery.
nonreadmission group.
Length of stay is commonly used as an Conclusions
indirect tool to measure ICU resource use In the case of patients readmitted within 7
and economic costs. Prolonged length of stay days of a previous ICU discharge, the major
is related to high health care costs, poor cause of readmission was cardiac problems,
patient prognosis, and poor quality of life of whereas the major cause of readmission after
discharged patients. In particular, patients 7 days was infectious causes. The frequency
who have a long ICU stay have a high mor- of postoperative health problems varies
tality and low quality of life after discharge.29 according to the length of hospital stay. Thus,
Unplanned ICU readmissions would lead medical teams should monitor and evaluate
to high medical costs because of the prolonged all clinical aspects of their patients, including
length of stay. With the current emphasis on underlying diseases, for early detection of
decreasing length of stay, more patients may problems. Identifying the causes of unplanned
be transferred to general care units earlier ICU readmissions can help to determine which
while they still require inotropic drugs and patients are at high risk for deterioration,
support devices, which can eventually serve lay the foundation for elucidation of the opti-
as risk factors for readmission, causing a mal ICU discharge time, monitor patients
vicious cycle. Hence, appropriate assessment requiring special continuous and intensive
of ICU discharge time should allow patients attention in general care units, and provide

38
VOLU ME 27 • N U MB ER 1 • JANUARY-M ARCH 2016 ICU RE A D M ISSION A FT E R CA RD IAC SURGE RY

these patients with high-quality treatment 12. Boots RJ. Can readmissions really be used as an ICU
performance indicator? Crit Care Med. 2013;41(1):
and care by early identification of warning 331-332.
signs. Furthermore, the knowledge of the risk 13. Nishi GK, Suh RH, Wilson MT, Cunneen SA, Margulies
DR, Shabot MM. Analysis of causes and prevention of
factors associated with ICU readmission early readmission to surgical intensive care. Am Surg.
could be used to target intervention in sub- 2003;69(10):913-917.
sets of patients at risk for readmission and 14. Choi EY. A Study on the Related Factors of Readmis-
sion to Intensive Care Unit. [master’s thesis]. Seoul,
create decision algorithms or protocols for South Korea: Seoul National University; 2006.
appropriate discharge time. 15. Kim NM. An exploratory study on the ICU readmission
and its related factors in adults. Nurs Sci. 2008;20(1):
23-32.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 16. Siddiqui S. Patients readmitted to the intensive care
unit: can they be prevented? Int Arch Med. 2013;6
This study was supplemented and revised (1):18.
from the author’s thesis and was presented 17. Badawi O, Breslow MJ. Readmissions and death after
before the Seoul Nurse Association in South ICU discharge: development and validation of two
predictive models. PLOS One. 2012;7(11):e48758.
Korea. Special thanks to professor Young Sun 18. Frost SA, Alexandrou E, Bogdanovski T, et al. Severity
Jung and Hye Ran Choi, who provided com- of illness and risk of readmission to intensive care: a
ments and support. meta-analysis. Resuscitation. 2009;80(5):505-510.
19. Zimmerman JE. Intensive care unit readmission: the
issue is safety not frequency. Crit Care Med. 2008;
36(3):984-985.
REFERENCES 20. Ball C, Kirkby M, Williams S. Effect of the critical care
1. Song DH, Lee SK, Kim CG, Choi DJ, Lee SI, Park SK. outreach team on patient survival to discharge from
Unplanned readmission to intensive care unit during hospital and readmission to critical care: non-randomised
the same hospitalization at a teaching hospital. Qual population based study. BMJ. 2003;327(7422):1014.
Improve Health Care. 2003;10(1):28-41. 21. Lai JI, Lin HY, Lai YC, Lin PC, Chang SC, Tang GJ.
2. Rosenberg AL, Watts C. Patients readmitted to ICUs: a Readmission to the intensive care unit: a population-based
systematic review of risk factors and outcomes. Chest. approach. J Formos Med Assoc. 2012;111(9):504-509.
2000;118(2):492-502. 22. Benetis R, Sirvinskas E, Kumpaitiene B, Kinduris S.
3. Kramer AA, Higgins TL, Zimmerman JE. The association A case-control study of readmission to the intensive
between ICU readmission rate and patient outcomes. care unit after cardiac surgery. Med Sci Monit. 2013;
Crit Care Med. 2013;41(1):24-33. 19:148-152.
4. Litmathe J, Kurt M, Feindt P, Gams E, Boeken U. Pre- 23. Kogon B, Jain A, Oster M, Woodall K, Kanter K, Kirsh-
dictors and outcome of ICU readmission after cardiac bom P. Risk factors associated with readmission after
surgery. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009;57(7):391-394. pediatric cardiothoracic surgery. Ann Thorac Surg.
5. Cooper GS, Sirio CA, Rotondi AJ, Shepardson LB, 2012;94(3):865-873.
Rosenthal GE. Are readmissions to the intensive care 24. Salpeter SR, Buckley JS, Chatterjee S. Impact of more
unit a useful measure of hospital performance? Med restrictive blood transfusion strategies on clinical out-
Care. 1999;37(4):399-408. comes: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Am J
6. Yanatori M, Tomita S, Miura Y, Ueno Y. Feasibility of Med. 2014;127(2):124-131.e3.
the fast-track recovery program after cardiac surgery in 25. Surgenor SD, DeFoe GR, Fillinger MP, et al. Intraopera-
Japan. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007;55(11):445-449. tive red blood cell transfusion during coronary artery
7. Salhiyyah K, Elsobky S, Raja S, Attia R, Brazier J, bypass graft surgery increases the risk of postoperative
Cooper GJ. A clinical and economic evaluation of fast- low-output heart failure. Circulation. 2006;114(1 Suppl):
track recovery after cardiac surgery. Heart Surg Forum. I43-I48.
2011;14(6):e330-e334. 26. Lee LJ, Emons MF, Martin SA, et al. Association of blood
8. Bardell T, Legare JF, Buth KJ, Hirsch GM, Ali IS. ICU glucose levels with in-hospital mortality and 30-day read-
readmission after cardiac surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac mission in patients undergoing invasive cardiovascular
Surg. 2003;23(3):354-359. surgery. Curr Med Res Opin. 2012;28(10):1657-1665.
9. Ouanes I, Schwebel C, Francais A, et al. A model to pre- 27. Renton J, Pilcher DV, Santamaria JD, et al. Factors associ-
dict short-term death or readmission after intensive care ated with increased risk of readmission to intensive care in
unit discharge. J Crit Care. 2012;27(4):422.e421-e429. Australia. Intensive Care Med. 2011;37(11):1800-1808.
10. Timmers TK, Verhofstad MH, Moons KG, Leenen LP. 28. Kramer AA, Zimmerman JE. The relationship between
Patients’ characteristics associated with readmission to hospital and intensive care unit length of stay. Crit
a surgical intensive care unit. Am J Crit Care. 2012;21(6): Care Med. 2011;39(5):1015-1022.
e120-e128. 29. Lagercrantz E, Lindblom D, Sartipy U. Survival and
11. Kaben A, Correa F, Reinhart K, et al. Readmission to a quality of life in cardiac surgery patients with pro-
surgical intensive care unit: incidence, outcome and longed intensive care. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010;89(2):
risk factors. Crit Care. 2008;12(5):R123. 490-495.

39

You might also like