Professional Documents
Culture Documents
net/publication/334591545
CITATION READS
1 52
1 author:
Mitchell C Colver
Utah State University
7 PUBLICATIONS 30 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by Mitchell C Colver on 20 July 2019.
Freire (1998), as a world-renowned educator, speaks boldly about the world of education,
the role of a teacher, and of political discourse, especially of the pernicious forms of
authoritarianism that creep into our schools. He speaks of knowledge and of growth, both for
students as well as for teachers, and so much of what he says is not only inspirational but
incredibly helpful. Three key themes that Freire (1998) discusses in his book, Teachers as
Cultural Workers, that are particularly insightful include his thoughts on literacy, his exploration
of love in the classroom, as well as his dynamic discussion of the role of shared authority within
teacher/student relationships.
Freire's (1998) thoughts on the importance of literacy are transformative, yet simple,
especially in their emphasis on how literacy expands and enhances our creative capacities when
we externalize our thoughts. As Freire (1998) explains, "We must remember that there is a
dynamic movement between thought, language, and reality that, if well understood, results in a
greater creative capacity" (p. 3). This point is critical to the well-being of 21st century educators,
in understanding that as we think about the reality of our world and then externalize those
thoughts through literate articulation, we move from a realm of simply experiencing reality to
actually creating it with our words. With so many new tools of expression being made available
within our schools, Freire’s thoughts are not only relevant, but prophetic. As other authors have
noted, such as Rommetveit (1979), moving from merely expressing ideas to sharing them with
others allows us to go a step further and create a temporary shared reality, which is not only a
powerful concept, but critical to our understanding of the work that teachers do and to the work
extolling literacy to such a high degree, which often results in colonializing-by-literacy, Freire
(1998), in contrast, expands this discussion of the importance of literacy by speaking to the
disastrous consequences of being illiterate. Although Canella and Viruru (2004) argue against the
idea that "literate human beings are always better off that illiterate ones" (p. 39), Freire (1998)
goes as far to say that being illiterate robs one of enjoying full citizenship within a society: "Even
if literacy does not wipe out the socially created relationships between language, thought, and
reality, it is a handicap that becomes an obstacle to achieving full citizenship" (pp. 2-3). The idea
here is that in order to actively participate as a citizen of any group, one must be prepared to fully
engage the multiple discourses that play out in social interactions. This dialogue, which often
requires one to write as often as to read, begins to falter when our skills for reading the world and
sharing the products of that reading with others are not developed to their full potential. As
Freire (1998) explains, "Illiteracy is a handicap to the extent that in literate cultures it interdicts
the illiterates by preventing them from completing the cycle in the relationship between
While we can appreciate the caution that Canella and Viruru (2004) plead for when
enacting such glossy views of literacy, Freire (1998) accurately asserts that becoming literate is
one of the most important activities that human beings can engage in. In our most impoverished
and at-risk communities, as well as in our schools with the greatest financial need, reading
unlocks worlds of great importance for the young minds of the students served, despite their
often disadvantaged arrangements of poverty, access, and habitus. As Freire (1998) points out,
The importance of love in the classroom is not only found throughout the writings of
Freire, but also in the devoted work of bell hooks. hooks (2010) writes that "when we teach with
love we are better able to respond to the unique concerns of individual students, while
simultaneously integrating those concerns in the classroom community" (p. 160). Each one of us
can easily think back to some of our favorite teachers and see their pedagogy reflected in love
and in the words of both hooks and Freire. Freire (1998) underscores this message, speaking not
merely to the importance of love but to love as the very essence of teaching: "In short, it is
impossible to teach without a forged, invented, and well-thought-out capacity to love" (p. 5). He
speaks of this capacity of being "both joyful and rigorous" (p. 5) and also talks about what can
happen when love is not allowed to flow freely in the classroom. There is a great need in the
neoliberal trends of our current global educational climate for these words to be heard, to be
Speaking of being observed too often and too intrusively, which is just one outcropping
of neoliberal hegemony, Freire (1998) outlines the emotional fallout of placing teachers in a
bureaucratic equivalent of Bentham's panopticon: "When teachers become fearful, they begin to
internalize the dominator's shadow and the authoritarian ideology of the administration. These
teachers are no longer alone with their students because the force of the the punitive and
threatening dominant ideology comes between them" (p. 16). When this type of fear comes over
professionals, it is often because they have found their professionalism constantly under review
by administrators. This not only wears them down, but gets in the way of being able to serve
students who can intuitively sense the affective down-shift in their teacher's demeanor. Such
negative energy in the classroom not only inhibits the teacher's ability to show love and to
express that love in their teaching work, but also impacts their ability to establish community, a
In his FIDUROD structure of western epistemology, Kincheloe (2008) points to the ill
effects of creating a decontextualized learning space, which can "distort" (p. 23) our
understanding of students. As we work to build community in the classroom, such distortions can
get in the way of us creating a community that is actually relevant for our students. As was
similarly explained by Freire (1998), "Educators need to know what happens in the world of the
children with whom they work. They need to know the universe of their dreams, the language
with which they skillfully defend themselves from the aggressiveness of their world, what they
know independently of the school, and how they know it" (p. 130). Such funds of knowledge (see
also González, Moll, & Amanti, 2005) can unlock new worlds for teachers and for the
Indeed, being respectful to students' funds of knowledge requires that the teacher "read"
his or her students, which Freire (1998) explains can take practice: "Another fundamental aspect
related to early experiences of novice teachers, one that teacher training programs should pay the
closest attention to if they don't already, is teachers' preparation for 'reading' a class of students
as if it were a text to be decoded, comprehended" (p. 88). A proper reading of one's class can
help the teacher foreground certain topics, issues, lessons, questions, etc. that would be
particularly relevant, interesting, passion-inspiring, or just plain fun for the students, given each
of their unique backgrounds. As teachers model this insight-driven interaction with each of their
students, highlighting strengths and interests within the classroom, students naturally respond
and begin to mimic the teacher's interest in their fellow students' lives. As they learn and share
about each other's unique backgrounds, common threads of diversity emerge, can be articulated,
Common threads
importance of understanding how interrelated these themes of literacy, love, and community are
with one another. When Freire talks about literacy, he is speaking of it as a vehicle for both
greater love in the classroom, as well as a vehicle for greater community. When he speaks about
love being the essence of a teacher's work, he is describing how that love is manifest in the
teacher facilitating the ever-increasing literacy of his or her students, as well as facilitating
community through expression and through the appreciation of diversity. When Freire speaks of
community in the classroom, he does so from the standpoint that community is predicated on
As we read Freire's work and reflect on our own classroom experiences, his thoughts
allow us to reread our former experiences with new eyes. This synthesis of experience, thought,
literacy, and reflection creates not only a truly Freirean experience, but one that is crucial to the
Cannella, G. S., & Viruru, R. (2004). Childhood and postcolonization: Power, education, and
Freire, P. (1998). Teachers as Cultural Workers. Letters to Those Who Dare Teach. Cambridge,
González, N., Moll, L., & Amanti, C. (2005). Funds of knowledge. Mahwah, NJ.