Professional Documents
Culture Documents
An offprint from
Edited by
Vin Davis
Mark Edmonds
Contents
Interlude 10 351
Chapter 22 353
Neolithic near-identical twins:
The ambivalent relationship between
‘factory’ rock and polished stone implements
Stephen Briggs
Chapter 23 361
Flint axes, ground stone axes and “battle axes”
of the Copper Age in the Eastern Balkans
(Romania, Bulgaria)
Florian Klimscha
Stone Axe Studies III TEXT March2011:Layout 1 18/03/2011 13:35 Page 189
Roberto Risch,
Nicole Boivin,
Michael Petraglia,
David Gómez-Gras,
Ravi Korisettar,
Dorian Fuller
The prehistoric axe factory at Sanganakallu-Kupgal (Bellary District), southern India 191
Stone Axe Studies III TEXT March2011:Layout 1 18/03/2011 13:35 Page 192
The prehistoric axe factory at Sanganakallu-Kupgal (Bellary District), southern India 193
Stone Axe Studies III TEXT March2011:Layout 1 18/03/2011 13:35 Page 194
Fig. 4.
Stages in axe production:
1:
natural dolerite block;
2:
initial flaking of lateral
1 2 edges of the block;
3:
flaked blank;
4:
blank with slight
pecking traces;
5:
blank with more
3 4 intensive pecking,
6:
polished axe.
5 6
In general, three reduction strategies have nical control (method 1) (Brumm et al. 2007).
been identified in the Sanganakallu lithic In this case, the rocks were reduced on one face
assemblage. The methods are defined mostly through lateral flaking, while knapping on the
on the basis of the initial dolerite stone pack- opposite face was much less invasive, thus tak-
ages utilized (Brumm et al. 2007). These include: ing advantage of at least one of the flat surfaces
of the slabs or blocks. Again, the underlying
1) large symmetrical sub-rectangular stone principle seems to be to spare effort and time
blocks and thick slabs; during the knapping, as well as during the later
2) thin flat cortical slabs; pecking and grinding stages.
3) flake blanks and non-flake debitage of One possible way of determining the tech-
varying shapes and sizes. nical competence or variation of knapping is to
consider the relation between the length and
In all cases, the dominant procedure was to the weight of the blanks and finished axes.
work the blocks, slabs or flakes bifacially around High technical control results in thin artefacts,
the perimeter of the stone piece (Fig. 4). Yet, which require shorter polishing processes
considerable variation in the knapping proce- and/or provide sharper edges. Depending on
dures can be observed within all three trajec- the type of natural rocks used, it also enables
tories, suggesting that persons with very the maximisation of raw materials. Low flaking
different skills and habits were operating simul- skills produce thick and, consequently, heavier
taneously in the area. artefacts. Therefore, the relation between length
The main target that needs to be achieved in and weight provides a useful analytical test to
the knapping process is the reduction in thick- evaluate the degree of skill manifest in the flak-
ness of the rough-outs, as thinner axe blanks ing process.2 If we correlate these two variables
will require less pecking and grinding. Unskilful measured on a sample of artefacts from the
knapping is visible in the form of thick blanks Sanganakallu axe collection, it can be observed
which had no further modification. These that variation in production is high (Fig. 5). On
resulted in discard in the quarry and settlement average, unskilled examples are 2.8 times heav-
areas. On occasion, these thick blanks were ier than the well-flaked blanks of the same size.
transformed into percussion tools. It is much For example, the weight of a typical 10 cm long
easier and quicker to dress thin slabs or flakes axe varies between 100 and 240 gr. As expected,
(methods 2 and 3) than working larger blocks most of the finished and used axes fall among
and slabs, which requires a higher level of tech- the lighter examples. It seems reasonable to
Fig. 6.
Polishing hollows from
Choudammagudda at an
initial, middle and final
stage of development
(Photograph by
J.A. Soldevilla).
The prehistoric axe factory at Sanganakallu-Kupgal (Bellary District), southern India 195
Stone Axe Studies III TEXT March2011:Layout 1 18/03/2011 13:35 Page 196
While the manufacture of dolerite axes was suggests collective production carried out by a
the dominant activity over at least the last 150 team of part-time knappers and polishers,
years of Feature 1’s occupation, it is equally clear whose target was mass production rather than
that other activities also took place within this the development of a high degree of technical
building. Apart from dozens of dolerite, gabbro, expertise. The lack of concern with raw material
quartz and hematite hammerstones and a large maximisation indicates that good dolerite stone
stone slab with polishing grooves linked to axe was abundant and easily accessible.
production, the structure’s users disposed of Access to the dolerite stone was not exclusive
cereal processing tools (handstones and to the inhabitants of Hiregudda. The lithic
querns), polishing artefacts and even one pot- records of Choudammagudda and Sannarach-
tery burnisher. Finished axes and chisels sug- ammagudda show that these settlements
gest that wood working could have been carried obtained natural slabs or blocks as well as half
out as well. A further activity was the repairing finished blanks from the same dyke (Fig. 8).
and resharpening of such edge tools, as can be Percussion tools as well as dolerite debitage
inferred from the presence of flake and non- confirm that their populations were producing
flake debitage bearing ground facets as well as or finishing axe blanks. Differences in the
some reworked axes (Brumm et al. 2007). organisation of axe production between com-
The spatial distribution of the artefacts and munities emerge in the intensity of finds rather
debris within Feature 1 shows a clear pattern, than in the organisation of activities. Thus,
and the structure appears to have been entered while discarded axe blanks represent around
from the south. According to the distribution of Fig. 8. 30% of the macro-lithic tools recorded at
debitage, axe production seems to have been Relative proportion Hiregudda Area A, their importance drops to
3.3 times more intense in the western than in (100%=1) of the main around 10–15% at the other sites (Fig. 8).
the eastern half of the room. A large immobile stone artefact categories The results obtained from the other settle-
granite quern placed in the southeast corner in the three settlements of ments do not show a superior or inferior degree
seems to have been transformed during the the Sanganakallu-Kupgal of technical competence among their knappers.
final occupation into an axe grinding surface, archaeological complex Discarded blanks from Choudammagudda and
which may indicate the greater importance of (axe blanks, Sannarachamma show the same type of work-
axe production activities during the last cen- hammerstones, polishing ing procedures and mistakes in comparison to
turies of the occupation. Pottery and ash are hollows are mainly the areas close to the quarry, although axe pro-
more frequent in the northeastern corner, sug- related to axe production; duction was clearly a less important activity.
gesting that this was an area for food prepara- hansdstones and grinding Handstones, a clear indicator of the processing
tion and consumption. Outside the dwelling, hollows are the main of cereal and other crops, represent more than
large amounts of knapping debris accumulated, food processing tools). 30% of the macrolithic tools recorded through
and seem to have resulted from periodic clean- These results are based systematic surface survey in these two settle-
ing of its inner space. The presence of 16 grind- on systematic surface ments. In Hiregudda they only represent
ing grooves on granite boulders recorded in recording of artefacts. around 24% of the macrolithic assemblage. The
Hiregudda, absent or rare on the other hill set- Comparison with the frequency of surface grinding slabs and hollows
tlements, confirms that the specialised edge material from test is much larger at Choudammagudda and
grinding and finishing of axes and chisels rep- trenches shows a Sannarachamma than at Hiregudda, also sug-
resented another important and time consum- high correspondence gesting differences in the activities conducted
ing activity in Area A. Clearly, the inhabitants between values. in the settlements (Fig. 8).
of other more ‘domestic’ structures and
dwellings identified in the vicinity were partic-
%
ipating in these tasks and maintained a close 0,5
relation with the production processes taking
0,45
place in Feature 1. The analysis of the knapping
debitage as well as of the discarded axe blanks 0,4 Blanks
has confirmed that a variety of working meth- 0,35 Hammerst.
ods were carried out inside and outside Feature 0,3 Pol.Hollows
1 by persons showing very different levels of 0,25
Handstone
technical competence. This pattern does not 0,2
Grin.Hollows
conform to a highly specialised workshop, nor 0,15
to domestic production with a specialised work- 0,1
ing tradition passed from generation to gener- 0,05
ation.3 Rather, the combination of technically
0
diverse, and at the same time more and more Hirregudda Choudammag. Sanarachamma
intense knapping during the last 250/150 years,
The prehistoric axe factory at Sanganakallu-Kupgal (Bellary District), southern India 197
Stone Axe Studies III TEXT March2011:Layout 1 18/03/2011 13:35 Page 198
Length
not be as deep as at the other sites) and it is 100
possible that it could therefore have devoted 80
more work force time to axe polishing. The large
number of handstones, grinding slabs and 60 HGD
grinding hollows recorded on the surface sug- 40 SAN
gests the permanent character of this settle- 20
ment and the importance of the processing and
consumption of agricultural products within it. 0
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700
The southernmost settlement of the
Sanganakallu-Kupgal complex, at Sannarach- Weight
ammagudda, has a surprisingly high proportion
of percussion stones, particularly of dolerite and ask if Area A, at least during the final occupa- Fig. 9.
gabbro, confirmed both through surface survey tion phase, was more of a working area used Differences between
and excavation (trench 10). The presence of periodically by groups coming from the other Hiregudda (Area A) and
dolerite blocks, flakes and blanks on the site settlements, rather than a settlement by itself. Sannarachammagudda
confirms that this community obtained useful In any case, the presence of a considerable (Trench 10) in relation to
raw materials from the Hiregudda quarry and amount of crop grinding hollows as well as the the length and weight
participated in axe production. According to the evidence from Feature 1 itself, suggests that ratio of axe blanks.
length/weight index of axe blanks used to everyday subsistence activities were not un- Lines mark the relation
describe technical competence, the knapping usual in the area. between length and
skills at Sannarachamma were not lower than The distribution and organisation of the weight and are therefore
those displayed at Hiregudda (Fig. 9). Other means of production in the Sanganakallu area indicative of higher (left)
aspects of the knapping process show that all indicates a considerable circulation in terms of or lower (right) technical
three sites shared the same technology and populations, raw materials, axe blanks, techno- competence.
expertise. However, the high proportion of logical skills and, expectedly, subsistence goods
hammerstones at the southern hill site can also between the three hill settlements. The division
be related to the knapping of other materials, of tasks within this society seems to have been lim-
including the production of small flake and ited, and in general all communities living in
bladelet tools on quartz and chert, as well as to this area were engaged to a certain extent in
the preparation and maintenance of cereal the flaking, pecking and grinding of dolerite
grinding tools, which have here a similar impor- axes. However, the production of chisels
tance to that observed at Choudammagudda appears to have been restricted to one area
(Fig. 8). Finally, the low number of grinding hol- close to the dolerite outcrop. So far, the study
lows and grooves indicate that a limited work of the lithic means of production does not suggest
force was devoted to axe grinding at this site. any marked division of labour between settlements
In general, it can be concluded that the same nor in the excavated house units. Neither can signs
set of stone tools and raw materials were produced, of economic centralisation be identified in the area.
maintained and used on all three hills. All settle- Yet, the scale of axe production leaves no doubt
ments had direct access to the dolerite quarry that we are not dealing in any of the three hill-
or, at least, to the products produced there, as settlements with a self-sufficient communal
the presence of unworked blocks and blanks production. No approximate calculation of the
suggest. Economic differences existed among the total volume of axes produced in the
settlements as demonstrated by different work Sanganakallu area has been carried out so far,
efforts and the different activities performed at the but the figure definitely lies in the many thou-
settlements. While Hiregudda, and particularly sands, rather than the hundreds. The manufac-
Area A, centred on the quarrying and working ture of such quantities of utilitarian objects only
of dolerite, the other settlements appear to have makes sense if an extra-regional distribution
been more agriculturally-oriented. The trans- system existed.
actions between the settlements seem to have In this socio-economic context, it is of inter-
been fluid given the exchange of materials and est that the most highly specialised activity area
technologies between them. One might even discovered so far lies separated from all settlement
areas, c. 400 m southeast of Sannarachamma. have disturbed such deposits, surface finds
On several more or less flat granite bedrock sur- should be expected. The clear spatial separation
faces across an area of c. 30x25 m, we have of this area must respond to an intentional
recorded up to 138 grinding grooves.4 Probably social or political decision, as no significant geo-
their original number was much higher, given logical differences exist between this bedrock
erosion processes and destruction caused due and the granite forming the surfaces of all three
to their position next to the modern village of inselbergs. In fact, similar lateral grinding was
Sanganakallu. All grooves show the character- carried out at a much more limited scale on
istic V section already observed around Feature Hiregudda Area A and occasionally also on
1 of Hiregudda, although many are much Sannarachamagudda. Consequently, these spe-
larger, reaching up to 100 cm in length (Fig. 10). cific axe grinding activities and/or the persons
In fact, they are the result of a successive juxta- carrying them out were maintained apart from
position of several shorter grooves. Such the everyday habitation areas. Our impression
grooves do not seem appropriate for the grind- is that other groups were present in this spe-
ing or polishing of the axes, nor their cutting cialised area. Its position on the plain, south of
edges, which require wider, flat or U shaped the two largest habitation sites and away and
grooves, as know from African, Australian as out of sight from the dolerite quarry would be
well as European axe production areas (e.g. an appropriate location at which to engage with
Shaw 1944; McCarthy 1976:54). Rather, these communities of a wider region and carry out
Fig. 10. grinding surfaces seem to be the result of the the exchange of either axe blanks or more or
Partial view of the area polishing of the lateral margins and the butt of less finished products. Perhaps the finishing of
with polishing grooves the axes and, in consequence, they must be the axe margins in such a context of negotiation
located in the plain below related to the finishing of axes or chisels. might have been considered a proof of the value
Sanarachammagudda and Although the labour force responsible for the of the offered products. Alternatively, axe fin-
next to the modern village development of such grooves is considerable, ishing may have been carried out by the visiting
of Sanganakallu as became manifest in the experimental tests, groups themselves, or by diverse communities
(Photograph by no settlement traces can be identified in the during the course of social and exchange activ-
J.A. Soldevilla). neighbourhood. Even if the modern village may ities.
Conclusions
The Sanganakallu-Kupgal area represents a
unique archaeological complex in South Asia.
Given that there has been a reprieve in the
present-day quarrying of the granite inselbergs,
the archaeological sites of the area will continue
to offer exceptional opportunities to investigate
the social and economic organisation of prehis-
toric axe production strategies. The research car-
ried out so far shows that at least three hill
settlements, probably with a few hundred
inhabitants each, were engaged in the quarry-
ing and working of a special type of dolerite. Its
easy extraction, fine-grained texture and ex-
treme hardness made it a highly suitable raw
material for the manufacture of chisels, adzes
and axes through flaking, pecking and intense
polishing. The access of all three settlements to
raw material, and the similarity across them of
working techniques and artefact types, indicates
that the communities shared basic economic
resources and were closely related. Accordingly,
a marked division of tasks between the hill set-
tlements did not develop. Apart from axe man-
ufacture, all communities were engaged to
some extent in other tasks, such as food pro-
cessing, pottery-making, bead production, etc.
The prehistoric axe factory at Sanganakallu-Kupgal (Bellary District), southern India 199
Stone Axe Studies III TEXT March2011:Layout 1 18/03/2011 13:35 Page 200
The prehistoric axe factory at Sanganakallu-Kupgal (Bellary District), southern India 201
Stone Axe Studies III TEXT March2011:Layout 1 18/03/2011 13:35 Page 202
India. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 16 (2), Korisettar, R., Joglekar, P.P., Fuller, D.Q. &
165–90. Venkatasubbaiah, P.C. 2001b. Archaeological re-
Brumm, A., Boivin, N., Korisettar, R., Koshy, J. & investigation and archaeozoology of seven
Whittaker, P. 2007. Stone axe technology in Southern Neolithic sites in Karnataka and Andhra
Neolithic south India: New evidence from the Pradesh. Man and Environment 26, 47–66.
Sanganakallu-Kupgal Region, mid-eastern Le Roux, C.T. 2002. Plussulien et la diffusion des
Karnataka. Asian Perspectives 46 (1), 65–95. haches polies armoricaines. In J. Guilaine (ed.),
Davis, M. 2001. Late Victorian Holocausts. El Niño Matériaux, productions, circulations du Néolithique à
Camines and the Making of the Third World. Verso l’Age du Bronze, 101–112. Paris: Errance.
Books, London. McCarthy, F.D. 1976. Australian aboriginal stone
Delage, J.Ph. 2004. Les ateliers de taille néolothiques en implements. The Australian Museum Trust, Sydney.
Bergaracois. Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Paddayya, K. 2001. The problem of ash-mounds of
Sociales, Toulouse. Southern Deccan in the light of the Budihal
Fawcett, F. 1892. Pre-Historic rock pictures near excavations, Karnataka. Bulletin of the Deccan
Bellary, South India. Imperial and Asiatic Quarterly College Post-Graduate and Research Institute 60–61,
Review (n.s.) 3, 147–57. 189–225.
Foote, R.B. 1887. Notes of some recent Neolithic and Pétrequin, P. & Jeunesse, C. 1995. La hache de pierre.
Palaeolithic finds in the South. Journal of the Asiatic Carrières vosgiennes et échanges de lames polies
Society of Bengal LVI (2), 259–282. pendant le Néolithique (5400–2100 a.J.C.). Paris:
Foote, R.B. 1916. The Foote collection of Indian prehistoric Editions Errance.
and protohistoric antiquities: notes on their ages and Pétrequin, P., Errera, M., Pétrequin, A-M. & Allard, P.
distribution. Madras: Madras Government Museum. 2006. The Neolithic quarries of Mont Viso,
Fuller, D.Q. 2006. Agricultural Origins and Frontiers in Piedmont, Italy: Initial radiocarbon dates, European
South Asia: a working synthesis. Journal of World Journal of Archaeology 9 (1), 7–30.
Prehistory 20, 1–86. Pigeot, N. 1987. Magdaléniens d’Etiolles: économie de
Fuller, D.Q. & Korisettar, R. 2004. The Vegetational debitage et organisatin sociale (l’unité d’habitation
Context of Early Agriculture in South India. Man U5). Ed. du C.R.N.S. Paris.
and Environment 29 (1), 7–27. Schaw, C.T. 1944. Report on excavations carried out in
Fuller, D.Q., Korisettar, R. & Venkatasubbaiah, P.C. the Cave known as “Bosumpra” at Abetifi, Kwahu,
2001. Southern neolithic cultivation systems: A Gold Coast Colony. PPS 20, 1–67.
reconstruction based on archaeobotanical evidence. Stout, D. 2002. Skill and cognition in stone tool
South Asian Studies 17, 171–187. production: an ethnographic case study from Irian
Fuller, D.Q., Korisettar, R., Venkatasubbaiah P.C. & Java. Current Anthropology 43, 693–722.
Jones, M.K. 2004. Early plant domestications in Subbarao, B. 1947. Archaeological explorations in
southern India: some preliminary archaeobotanical Bellary. Bulletin of the Deccan College Research
results. Vegetation History and Archaeobotany 13, Institute 8, 209–24.
115–29. Subbarao, B. 1948. Stone Age Cultures of Bellary. Poona:
Fuller, D.Q., Boivin, N. & Korisettar, R. 2007. Dating Deccan College.
the Neolithic of South India: new radiometric Risch, R. 2002. Recursos naturales, medios de producción
evidence for key economic, social and ritual y explotación social. Un análisis económico de la
transformations. Antiquity 81, 755–778. industria lítica de Fuente Alamo (Almería), 2250–1400
Johansen, P.G. 2004. Landscape, monumental ANE. Mainz Ph. von Zabern.
architecture, and ritual: a reconsideration of the Risch, R. 2008. From production traces to social
South Indian ash-mounds. Journal of organisation: towards an epistemology of
Anthropological Archaeology 23, 309–30. Functional Analysis. In L. Longo and N. Skakun
Kennedy, R. 1962. “Grinding benches” and mortars on (eds), “Prehistoric Technology” 40 years later:
Fernando Po. Man 62, 129–131. Functional Studies and the Russian Legacy. Museo
Kenoyer, J.M., Vidale, M. & Bhan, K.K. 1991. Civico di Verona & Università degli Studi di Verona:
Contemporary stone beadmaking in Khambhat, B.A.R., Int.Ser., 513–521.
India: Patter ns of craft specialization and
organization of production as reflected in the
archaeological record. World Archaeology 23, 44–63.
Korisettar, R., Venkatasubbaiah, P.C. & Fuller D.Q.
2001a. Brahmagiri and Beyond: the Archaeology of
the Southern Neolithic. In S. Settar and R.
Korisettar (eds), Indian Archaeology in Retrospect
(Volume I, Prehistory), 151–238. New Delhi:
Manohar.