Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Mid Term Exam BE
Mid Term Exam BE
Based on stakeholders perspective, they have right to safety but what’s happen, while
fast food can serve faster, bigger and cheaper than the other foods. People try to get it, and
also do not aware with the fat content inside
it. So its just a short- term desires and don’t
think deeply about the long-term effects while
they consume too much fast food. For parent,
bring their children to fast food restaurant are
more easily because of the fast servings time,
cheap and marketing promote like toys
inside it, make children like it. Parent don’t
need to be busy with cooking healthy foods,
just bring it to fast food restaurant, everything
will be okay. Every child almost like fast food but what’s happen if children become addicted
with fast food?! One of the effect is obesity and the dilemmas happen while safety is needed
but there should be sacrificing something, like time. Nowadays, technology and knowledge
have develop faster, and many research already doing to prove that fast food is truly bad for
people’s health but the fact is until now people still consume fast food and bring their
children to there. The dilemma once again happen, while people can’t control it self. They
prefer go with something cheap and fast for simply, and forget about the truth risk of fast
food.
In my opinion, if we talk about right or wrong its still confusing because the fault of
this issue are not totally the fault of fast food restaurant, consumers have take a part also. One
sentences in the book (page 227) that I agreed is “ Buyer beware and Seller take care”. That
means there should be an actions between both of them. Even the fast food already inform the
risk of eat to much fast food and put the nutritions content in their products, but if the
consumer can not beware or don’t care about it, it still the same, obesity can’t avoid. But
while two of them, could consider about the quality and safety of the products they made and
consume, I believe that obesity could be avoid.
The case also told about fraud and false advertising, one of the example is “the Hindu
plaintiffs' successful case against McDonald's for advertising "100-percent vegetable" oil
when in fact it contained beef essence”. In my opinion this is very unethical, while its not
only fast food restaurant doing this, almost every companies doing this to promote their
products as well as it is so people interest to buy their products, but forget about the ethics of
ads it self. In this term of case, I disagree with McD, the ads show that they are not honest
while promote their product. Consumer have right to know the truth and treat as it is should
be. McD have duty to inform consumer truthfully. While McD dishonest, consumer’s get the
disadvantages, and they have right to compensated.
In fast food restaurants perspectives, try to think not only about how to get profit as
much as it is then forget about product’s quality. Fast food restaurant have to response and
make some changes, while consumers complained about fat content in its products. They
have to consider about the health of the consumer when eat their foods. The code of ethics
while doing business, should be obey whether it is difficult or less profit. The effects are not
for short-term but long-term, because the confidence of customer with our products will lead
the going concern of the business it self.
For me, consume fast food for once time will not make us obesity, or make our health
damage but if we consume frequently, not strange if we get obesity. Nowadays, many medias
already told about the damage of fast food, so in my opinion people of course already know
also and they have right to choose whether eat fast food which is unhealthy or not. Even we
know that, we are as a consumer are not totally wrong in this case but our awareness and
control of our self are the most important thing that we can do. Not all the things are under
our control, and fast food restaurants are one of them, although Government already has
agencies to control them but they also have limitations so that the responsibility of this case is
the customers as consumers.
One simple sentences, but for me is the main point of the solution on this cases and its
already explained also in the previous pages, which is “Buyer beware and Seller take care”.
Simple but let us know, that not all the things are under our control, so the best thing that we
have to do is control our self. Start from ourself first. When every people could do this, both
the consumer and the fast food restaurant, I believe the bad things could be avoided.
REFERENCES
Weiss, Joseph W (2009). Business Ethics 5th edition, Chapter 5.
Werner, William B. and Andrew Hale Feinstein. May 2007. The risk to the American fast-food
industry of obesity litigation, (http://www.entrepreneur.com/tradejournals/article/163394871.html,
access on October 18th 2010).
Shapiro, Alycia. December 27th 2009. The impact of ethics on decision making- fast food or
fresh food, (http://ethics.pricesstop.com/2009/12/27/the-impact-of-ethics-on-decision-
making-fast-food-or-fresh-food/, access on October 18th 2010).