Professional Documents
Culture Documents
performance data, contracts includes clauses for enforcement and periodic auditing
takes place. For all this, they scored a 3 in environmental sustainability.
Edison International, Inc., through its subsidiaries, is a generator and distributor of
electric power. Looking solely at Southern California Edison, some of their best
practices include the publication of an annual Supplier Diversity Report, the creation of
a Supply Chain Management Group, SAP ERP software and the implementation of
Ariba’s Spend Management Platform. The SCM Group has developed comprehensive
purchasing strategies and combines these strategies with tools like Electronic Data
Interchange (EDI) to create an effective procurement system. The SCM Group is also
responsible for the Supplier Performance Program and category management
practices. Taking all of this into account, they scored a 3 for spend management, 3 for
category management, 2 for strategic sourcing and 2 for SRM. Their Supplier Code of
Conduct follows the ILO conventions and failure to follow these guidelines is grounds for
contract termination. In addition to the Supplier Code of Conduct, they have created an
EH&S Management System aimed at continuous improvement of EHS performance.
They were rated at a 2 for both LHR and environmental sustainability.
Based in Chicago, American Electric Power provides electric supply for retail customers
in the Northeast U.S. Some of their best practices include using AribaPay to encourage
dynamic discounting, supplier registration through Ariba and implementing Electronic
Data Interchange (EDI) throughout the procurement/supply chain process. The Ariba
network has resulted in consolidation of payment terms and streamlined the entire
procure-to-pay process. AEP received a rating of 3 in spend management, 2 in
category management, 2 in strategic sourcing and 2 in SRM. There is no separate
supplier code of conduct and their Principles of Business Conduct do not appear to
apply to suppliers. They automatically received a 1 in LHR and environmental
sustainability for this reason.
Southern Company is an electric utility holding company based in Atlanta, GA. Some of
their best practices include a supplier mentor program, Oracle PeopleSoft for HR and
payroll, and implementation of EDI. To automate their procure-to-pay process, they
have implemented Eqiq software. The result has been improved visibility and reduction
in supply management costs. They received a rating of 2 for spend management,
category management, sourcing strategy and SRM. There is no separate code of
conduct for LHR or environmental practices, however the Compliance Principles do
mention some of the ILO conventions. In addition to a CSR report, they publish annual
reports on water action, carbon disclosure and coal combustion disclosures. They
received a rating of 2 for both LHR and environmental sustainability.
Consolidated Edison, Inc. is one of the largest investor owned energy companies in the
U.S. Best practices include an extensive vendor qualification process, EDI solutions,
Oracle’s e-Business Suite for ERP and iSupplier (part of the Oracle Business Suite).
The iSupplier Portal self-service module enables suppliers to manage purchase orders,
submit invoices, view payments, and respond to requests for quotes. Con Edison has a
Corey Kuhar – MBA 610 Supply Chain Sustainability
comprehensive vendor qualification process and monitors key risk indicators of all
suppliers via periodic review. Additionally, they have broken down all purchase
categories for potential suppliers to see. For all this, they received a rating of 3 for
spend management, SRM and category management and 2 for strategic sourcing.
There is no separate code of conduct for LHR and environmental policy and the Vendor
Code of Conduct does not follow ILO Conventions. For this they received a rating of 1
for LHR. The Vendor Code of Conduct does mention environmental issues and there is
contractual language enforcing these policies, so they received a rating of 2 for
environmental sustainability.
Based in Minneapolis, MN, Xcel Energy, Inc. is a major electrical and natural gas
company. Some best practices include a Supplier Diversity Program, Oracle’s Utility
Management System and the web-based product Emportis sourcing application. In
addition to using Emportis e-sourcing, all suppliers are classified into 4 tiers based upon
annual spend. Those classified as tier 1, or critical, are included in their Supplier
Relationship Management program to help push for continuous improvement initiatives.
Sourcing follows a strict process and supply chain spending has been broken down into
31 categories, with 800 subcategories. The Supplier Qualification program uses an
independent firm to monitor all active suppliers for violations, criminal proceedings,
disasters, etc. Xcel received a rating of 3 for spend management, category
management and SRM. They received a rating of 2 for strategic sourcing. There is no
separate code of conduct for LHR, however the general code of conduct follows the ILO
Conventions, there is contract language enforcing these guidelines and periodic reviews
are performed. They received a rating of 3 for LHR. There is no separate
environmental policy code of conduct, but the general code of conduct does mention
environmental policy. Additionally, there is a formal Environmental Management
System to ensure compliance and improvement, periodic reviews from an independent
firm to ensure compliance and a detailed CSR report. They received a rating of 3.
Every company I reviewed published an annual CSR report and most companies
stressed supplier diversity. Additionally, all companies seem to have some sort of ERP
system in place to assist in spend management/category management. Surprisingly
little has been done in the area of LHR for a lot of companies. Furthermore, it seemed
like the companies with the best policies were the ones who had faced labor related
lawsuits in the past. To effectively manage all aspects of supply chains, companies will
need to 1) increase transparency; 2) develop programs for supplier evaluation; 3) work
directly with suppliers so it is understood why a particular score was given and 4)
encourage improvement through public reporting, compensation, and future business.