Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CONSTITUTION
: highest law of the land; beyond which, all other laws have to prove their legitimacy
: social contract that binds the people
: a social agreement/arrangement for the peace of the society
: the citizens rights and must follow the rules
*Ordinance is a law made by counselors
FUNCTIONS OF CONSTITUTION
1. Serves as the supreme or fundamental law
2. Establishes basic framework and underlying principles of government
3. Designed to protect the basic rights of the people
KINDS OF CONSTITUTION
1. As to their origin and history
a. Conventional or Enacted – enacted by a constituent assembly
b. Cumulative or Evolved – developed from customs, traditions, judicial decisions,
etc.
2. As to their form
a. Written – documented in a single file
b. Unwritten – some parts are documented, some are not
3. As to manner of amending them
a. Rigid or Inelastic – cannot be amended or altered easily because it is
documented
b. Flexible or Elastic – not documented so it can easily be altered
*The Philippine Constitution is classifies as conventional or enacted, written, and rigid or
inelastic. It was drafted by an appointive body called “Constitutional Commission”.
RENUNCIATION OF WAR
: refers only to the renunciation by the Philippines of aggressive war, not war in defensive war
because it is a basic right of self-preservation and self-defense, and the state has the right to
exist.
CITIZENSHIP
: registered individual in a political society
CITIZENS BY BIRTH
1. Jus Sanguinis – right of blood; the children follows the citizenship of the parents or one
of them
2. Jus Soli – right of the soil, place of birth is the basis for acquiring citizenship
NOTES ON CITIZENSHIP
1935: when the father is alien, the child follows the father’s citizenship. If the mother is
a Filipino citizen, the child or the mother must elect the Filipino Citizenship.
1973: the word “and” requires both parents to be a Filipino, only then, the child will be
considered citizen of the Philippines.
1987: the word “or” refers to either of the parent is a Filipino, then a child is also a
Filipino citizen. If the mother is a Filipino and the father is an alien and they are not
married, the 1987 Constitution protects the mother and the child from being stateless,
so both the mother and the child is a Filipino.
SUFFRAGE
Privilege – not all is given the privilege to vote because there are qualifications, but can be
held by the government.
Personal Right – it is something you cannot be delegated, something you cannot pass to
other people.
Constitutional Right – the Constitution provides for it / it is in the constitution.
Not Inherent – no one is born automatically with a right to vote because there is an age
requirement for it.
*Suffrage is not mandatory because of the word “may”.
Requirements:
Citizen of the Philippines
At least 18 years of age
Resided in the Philippines at least one year
Not disqualified by law
*Congress cannot impose property requirement for the exercise of suffrage.
LEGISLATIVE – to make laws, and when the time comes amend or repeal it.
*Congress: House of representatives and Senate
Senator: 2 consecutive terms of 6 years each term.
*Qualifications
✓A natural born citizen of the Philippines;
✓At least 35 y/o on the day of the election;
✓Able to read and write;
✓A registered voter; and
✓A resident of the Philippines for not less than 2 years immediately preceding the day of
the election.
READINGS
First Reading: title, author
Second Reading: content, amendments, debate
Third Reading: voting, no more amendments.
*The three-reading requirement is not absolute because the Constitution provides certain
exception that when the President certifies to the necessity of its immediate enactment to
meet a public calamity or emergency, a bill can become a law.
**CASES!!!
TECSON v. COMELEC
Issue: Whether or not Ronald Allan Poe is a natural-born Filipino citizen.
Grounds for Ruling:
He’s father is a Filipino Citizen under the Philippine Organic Act of 1902 which provides,
“…that all inhabitants of the Philippines who were Spanish subjects on April 11, 1899 and
resided therein including their children are deemed to be Philippine citizen.”
While Article 4, Section 1 (3) of the 1935 Constitution provides that FPJ is a Filipino citizen
because his father is a citizen of the Philippines.
MERCADO v. MANZANO
Issue: Whether or not Eduardo Barrios Manzano a legitimate child yet a Filipino and a US
citizen, being a dual citizen, is allowed to run for Vice-Mayor.
Grounds for Ruling:
Dual citizenship is different from dual allegiance. The former arises when, as a result of
the concurrent application of the different laws of two or more states, a person is
simultaneously considered a national by the said states.
Dual allegiance, on the other hand, refers to the situation in which a person
simultaneously owes, by some positive act, loyalty to two or more states. While dual
citizenship is involuntary, dual allegiance is the result of an individual's volition.
Article 5 Section 6 of the constitution was not concern with dual citizens per se but with
naturalized citizens who maintain their allegiance to their countries of origin even after their
naturalization. Hence, disqualification based on dual citizenship contemplates dual allegiance.
His mere filing of the COC is already renunciation.
VALLEZ v. COMELEC
Issue: Whether Rosalind Ybasco Lopez is a Filipino or an Australian.
Grounds for Ruling:
Rosalind Ybasco Lopez’s father is a Filipino Citizen under the Philippine Organic Act of
1902 which provides, “…that all inhabitants of the Philippines who were Spanish subjects
on April 11, 1899 and resided therein including their children are deemed to be Philippine
citizen.” Rosalind Lopez, an ascendant of her father makes her a Filipino citizen.
POE v. COMELEC
Issue: Whether or not Grace Poe is a Filipino citizen.
Grounds for Ruling:
Statistics: 99% of the people who are residing at Iloilo are Filipinos at that time
UN Convention Law: Foundlings acquire the citizenship of the country where they are
being found.
Constitution being silent vocal for foundlings.
Physical Features is Filipino.
RA 9225: Repatriation
LOZANO v. MARTINEZ
Issue: Whether or not BP22 is constitutional. Police Power exercised thru enactment of BP22.
Grounds for Ruling:
BP22 is constitutional because it protects the people from receiving worthless checks, it
being a public nuisance.
It is constitutional because it is passed as a law. One cannot violate a law that is
unconstitutional.