Palanca vs City of Manila

FACTS:

This is an appeal from an amended decision of the Court of First Instance of the city of Manila requiring
the defendant City of Manila to pay to the plaintiff the sum of P2,400 with legal interest thereon from the
respective dates on which the several payments composing the amount were made, without costs.

ISSUE:

Whether or not the plaintiff, by taking out and paying for his license as a distiller, is entitled to sell the
products of his distillery in a store separate and distinct therefrom without the necessity of taking out and
paying for an additional license as a wholesale liquor dealer.

HELD: Yes. “Statues which are plain and specific should be applied without attempted construction
and interpretation. Manila Liquor License Act No. 59, as amended by Act No. 95. Section 16 and 17
thereof, the latter as superseded by Act No. 95, provides license to be granted to distillers not only
authorizes the licensee "to conduct the business of a distiller of alcoholic liquors" but also "to sell, give
away or otherwise dispose of the products of such distillery, in quantities of one gallon or more". No
provision of the Act limits the place of sale or disposition of the products of the licensed distiller to the
distillery proper.

Judgment is affirmed, with costs against the appellants.