Eudaimonia and Self-sufficiency in the Nicomachean Ethics ‘Teresa wel koown dif in understanding Aristo’ answer othe eniral gueton ofthe Nicomacheon Eis whats eadaimoni? Some, leaning 00 Bk. X, chapters 6, matin that it's answer i con- templation tthe easton of anything ck, Other, anipg on BI bold that eudainonn Incas other goods Besides ontemplation, especially {ot vil cal) moral action, the execs ofthe moral tues. Siotbers| tha BEX cootains an exconive view of eudsimonia a consisting in thing but contemplation, ands notin the end resonelable wth BK. F's ‘Atpresent, a comsnas seems to be growing that at eas we cam bese that Bi I propounde an inclusive scout of eadnimonia "Hence. Bk. 1 tnd X ft together nto a coberent scour, BEX must De brooght intone srt sucha positon, Fal hie the comprehensive view" eudaimonia “The comphensive interpretation rebes ona number of arguments to supports iew of NEI aboveal the criterion of sefsucieney kd down [UTOV7OLE-21. Inthe present paper Uw argue thatthe appeal tose fuffiiency as wel as other agument al 10 prove the comprehensive #1 Gopr,Renan amon Good Art Cambie, 973) 95D. Key, “inctectaam Att, Pa, Spc Asan oe 97% p87 1 ‘Wing "aa Ne sett n Art” he or ae der Poet 0) pp 208511 Ail “Aro oaEumona nA Rey (Cay Emo on artes mc (Bre), 1885 TH. ein on, ‘man Bs idan, 5), ol "Penne Hag Aro Stein ame) Oxo Ses nce Psp (Ox. 1) ‘Scans od Arslan Concent Happ Sei an Shite) The Noms of Nar Came, pe. AE; AW. Pre“ Ar fetes Esc te Ma (Op Dt M, Not, Arsto' nT James {eed ani cso 1S Yr 2) pas Devereat. “Aro Siena D1 Oh Sas ne i, Pons 1884 ol XXX (Arpt Aaa 97) a