FERROHOMES TOWNSHIP: DESIGN OF A GREENOVATIVE HOUSING FOR

NHA IN BRGY. IMELDA, VILLANUEVA, MISAMIS ORIENTAL

A Project Study
Presented to
The Faculty of the Department of Civil Engineering

In Partial Fulfillment
Of the Requirements for Research
Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering

Submitted by:
Tan, Willie Jr. D.
Cua, Juan Rafael A.
Nieves, Deo Christian T.
Ocular, Ken Khirsten P.
 TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
TITLE PAGE………………………………………………………………………………………….i
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT………………………………………………………………………..ii
ABSTRACT………………………………………………………………………………………….iii
TABLE OF CONTENTS………………………………………………………………………….v
LIST OF TABLES………………………………………………………………………………….vi
LIST OF FIGURES……………………………………………………………………………….vii

Chapter

I. Introduction .......................................................................................... 1

1.1 Rationale ....................................................................................................... 1

1.2 Background of the study ............................................................................. 3

1.3 Statement of the Problem .......................................................................... 4

1.4 Objective of the Study ................................................................................. 5

1.5 Significance of the study............................................................................. 7

1.6 Scope and Limitations................................................................................. 8

1.7 Conceptual Framework............................................................................... 9

II. Review of Related Literature........................................................... 10

2.1 Foreign Study ............................................................................................. 10

2.2 Local Study ................................................................................................. 17

2.3 Study Area .................................................................................................. 19

III. Research Methodology .................................................................... 21

3.1 Research approach ................................................................................... 21

3.2 Research Design ....................................................................................... 22

3.3 Research Setting ....................................................................................... 22

3.4 Site Location Determination ..................................................................... 23

3.5 Township Planning .................................................................................... 24

3.6 Design of the Township Project .............................................................. 24

3.6.1 Land allocation ................................................................................. 25

3.6.2. Design of FerroHomes ................................................................... 27

3.6.3 Electrical and Sewerage System................................................... 29

3.7 Feasibility Study of FerroHomes ............................................................. 30

3.7.1 Structural Analysis ........................................................................... 30

3.7.2 Cost Analysis and Market Price Determination .......................... 45

IV. Results and Conclusion

V. Conclusion and Recommendation

References ...........................................................................................viii

Appendix................................................................................................ ix

LIST OF TABLES
Table Page
1.0 Parks and Playgrounds allocation……………………………………………………….25
2.0 Facilities According to the Number of Saleable Lots/ Dwelling Units for
Subdivision Projects I hectare and Above……………………………………………………….26
3.0 Occupancy Category………………………………………………………………………….32
4.0 Minimum Densities for Design Loads from Materials………………………….33
5.0 Minimum Uniform and Concentrated Live Loads………………………………..34
6.0 Minimum Roof live loads……………………………………………………………………35
7.0 Seismic Importance Factor, I………………………………………………………………37
8.0 Seismic Importance Factor, Ip……………………………………………………………37
9.0 Seismic Zone Factor, Z……………………………………………………………………….38
10.0 Nearest Fault Line from the site…………………………………………………………39
10.0a Seismic Source Type…………………………………………………………..……………..40
11.0 Near-Source Factor, Na……………………………………………………………………..40
12.0 Near-Source Factor, Nv………………………………………..……………………………40
13.0 Seismic Coefficient, Ca………………………………………………………………………41
14.0 Seismic Coefficient, Cv………………………………………………………………………42
15.0 Load Combinations…………………………………………………………………………..44

LIST OF FIGURES
Figure Page
1.0 Conceptual Framework…………………………………………………………………..9
2.0