-analyze the ownership pattern of NIRMA and compare HLL and Infosys

Promotor and Promotor group- 77.17%

promotor:25.59%
bodies corporate:12.57%
Other(trust):39.01%
public: 22.83
Institution - 1.62%
Foreign corporate bodies and public shareholders- 21.19%

Promoter holding : 77%

Institution : 1%
Non-Institution : 21%
Total public : 23%

77% of the total shares are in control of the promoter

- Promotor have confidence towards the company to get the better result in future.
-There is no diversification of funds in the company ( not good sign for the
investors)
Not a good in decision making process
- MF/FI/ Insurance company and foreign institution have total of 1.62% of the total

shares. So we can say that the institution does not have much of comfidence in
Nirma.

HLL

Promoter holding : 52%

Institution : 30%
Non-Institution : 18%
Total public : 48%
- Promoter control 52% of the shareholding
-There is diverrsification of share by good presence of institutional investors,
whcih
will help in carry decisions to benefit the earning and other shareholder
-The stock is well favoured in the market having sizeable FI/MF holding (high
confidence)
-there was increase in the

Infosys

Promoter holding : 16%

Institution : 44%
Non-Institution : 21%
Total public : 65%

-Low confidence from the Promoter

-Diversification of the shareholding pattern shows that good sign for investor in
decision making process.
-Stock is highly favoured by FI/MF
What were the motivations for the company to go public in 1994

What were the motivation for company to go private in 20010