Fancy life in an eco-village?

Welcome to the hi-tech off-grid communities

Circular economy

Guardian sustainable business

Residents in an eco-village project piloted in the Netherlands will produce solar and biogas power,
grow their food and recycle waste into fertiliser

Senay Boztas

Tue 12 Jul 2016 05.00 BSTLast modified on Mon 5 Sep 2016 10.50 BST

Designed by a Dutch eco-village company and a Danish architecture firm, the eco-village will
harness technology to create a self-sustaining community. Illustration: EFFEKT/ReGen

“If you look at any long lasting eco-village, it has usually been about religion, polyamory or drugs,”
says James Ehrlich, president of Netherlands-based ReGen Villages, who wants to build sustainable
communities for the 21st century.

“Those things are all great in their own way … but we want to express innovation and excitement.
Traditional eco-village people wait for 50 years for that one tree to fall so they can build their
community centre. I don’t think the planet has the time to wait. We have to build off-grid
neighbourhoods around the world as quickly as we can, and as many as we can.”

Since revealing plans for their modern eco-village at the Venice Biennale at the end of May, ReGen
Villages and architectural partners EFFEKT say they have seen a “firestorm” of viral activity and 6,500
interested emails. “What they are saying is: ‘We want in desperately: this is our dream,’” says
California-based Ehrlich.

“We’re getting emails from PhD [students], family members, older couples who want to downsize
with their friends … communities of people reaching out to us because they see we have essentially
done the homework for them.”

That homework involves combining the most modern technologies to build a circle of homes in a
closed-loop system that produces its own solar and biogas power, grows organic vegetables, farms
fish and chickens, harvests water and recycles waste into fertiliser. Homes, enclosed in greenhouses
to “extend the warm season”, will start at €200,000 (£170,000) plus about €500 (£425) a month for
food and services. Already, 1,200 people are on the waiting list.

Illustration of the ReGen circular system. Photograph: EFFEKT/ReGen Villages

ReGen – which means “rain” in Dutch and German – sees the answer to the world’s growing
population and scarcer resources in self-sustaining, rural communities. It will start building its first
100 homes in Almere Oosterwold in the eastern Netherlands this summer, aiming to raise €25m
(£21m) from private investors and sovereign wealth funds (who will be promised a return). It is
planning projects in Denmark and northern Europe, then hopes to create designs for every climate.

Although Ehrich is a Stanford University academic, and the architectural firm EFFEKT is Danish,
ReGen Villages is based in the Netherlands thanks to a rapturous Dutch welcome and a reputation
for innovative housing projects.

Tjeerd Herrema, head of housing at Almere council, explained it is letting a new area develop by
allowing people and collectives to build their own neighbourhoods and infrastructure (with a few
ground rules).

“We want to develop part of Almere in a completely different way, so people can decide their own
future,” he said. “ReGen Villages want to produce their own food, energy, planning their own land,
buildings and homes using the latest technology. That project fitted seamlessly into the philosophy
for Oosterwold.

“This is an experiment. Normally, government has a plan for an area, but we’ve turned that upside
down. It’s a kind of reaction to the crisis we’ve just come from, which caused so much
disappointment in our institutions and banks.”
Sinus Lynge, co-founder of EFFEKT architects, believes this suburban development in Oosterwold is
just the start of de-urbanisation. “It makes a lot of sense to look at being self-sufficient in a village, in
intensive modules, or in an area that is being deserted,” he said. “In the most intense inner city
areas like Shanghai or London, to give space to food is unthinkable.

There will be plenty of space to grow food. Photograph: EFFEKT/ReGen

“There’s also a huge wave of people who want to reconnect. The idea of knowing where your food
comes from is one [way], and in Denmark there’s a huge movement of people wanting to work less
and spend more time with their families: this could be an opportunity.”

Dr Frank Suurenbroek, professor of urban transformation at the Amsterdam University of Applied

Sciences, says the Netherlands has a history of radical housing developments, most recently driven
by ideas around sustainability – but that developers need to maintain a sense of reality.

“A possible field of tension is how the technological demands of sustainability and circularity
[interact with] spatial configurations needed to create attractive places and the desire to create new
houses fast,” he said. “Both worlds have to learn how to connect. Experiments with new sustainable
quarters are interesting and needed, but a major issue is how to do this within existing built areas.”

This is absolutely logical for Marlies Rohmer, the architect behind a 2011 complex of floating
houses in the manmade islands of IJburg, near Amsterdam. “It doesn’t suit everyone, but they are
great in the Netherlands for former harbours, where the infrastructure is there, parking is not a
problem and you have a very good public traffic system,” she said.
Floating homes in IJburg. Photograph: Marlies Rohmer Architects & Urbanists

Her architecture firm is set to work on a floating village with the firm Carillion Igloo Genesis in Royal
Victoria Docks in London, and she added that the surprising thing is how broadly attractive such
homes have proven in the Netherlands: “We thought this is housing for young urban people but
strangely people with children started to go there, attracted by an outside location. I’ve never seen
such a mixed population.”

Sustainable innovation may be threatened now that the Dutch housing market is booming, though,
according to architect Matthijs Bouw.

He has worked with another experimental, self-build community in Amsterdam’s Buiksloterham,

using digital technology to coordinate elements like building a waste management system. “Part of
[the motivation] is a culture of self-building and innovation, and part of it is driven by the Dutchman
as trader, getting rid of the middleman to get better results for less money,” he reflected. “But the
Dutch are fickle. With the changing real estate economy, there’s an incredible urgency to build
houses and Amsterdam has tended to return to the old models.”

Back at Almere, though, Ehrlich can’t wait to meet an “ebb and flow” of varied residents when the
first 25 homes are completed in early 2017. Some of the smallest inhabitants, it turns out, will be
soldier flies, great at breaking down compost and a food source for fish and chickens. “They are also
edible for humans, for people who are interested in that,” he confides, “and protein-delicious with
butter and garlic.”

As the crisis escalates…

… in our natural world, we refuse to turn away from the climate catastrophe and species extinction.
For The Guardian, reporting on the environment is a priority. We give reporting on climate, nature
and pollution the prominence it deserves, stories which often go unreported by others in the media.
At this pivotal time for our species and our planet, we are determined to inform readers about
threats, consequences and solutions based on scientific facts, not political prejudice or business
interests.

More people are reading and supporting The Guardian’s independent, investigative journalism than
ever before. And unlike many news organisations, we have chosen an approach that allows us to
keep our journalism accessible to all, regardless of where they live or what they can afford. But we
need your ongoing support to keep working as we do.

The Guardian will engage with the most critical issues of our time – from the escalating climate
catastrophe to widespread inequality to the influence of big tech on our lives. At a time when factual
information is a necessity, we believe that each of us, around the world, deserves access to accurate
reporting with integrity at its heart.

Our editorial independence means we set our own agenda and voice our own opinions. Guardian
journalism is free from commercial and political bias and not influenced by billionaire owners or
shareholders. This means we can give a voice to those less heard, explore where others turn away,
and rigorously challenge those in power.

We need your support to keep delivering quality journalism, to maintain our openness and to
protect our precious independence. Every reader contribution, big or small, is so valuable. Support
The Guardian from as little as $1 – and it only takes a minute. Thank you.
Few things to start on

 Is architecture ever sustainable?

 Can architecture be made sustainable in near future?
 To how much extent architecture can be made sustainable?
 Can we have a model which is 100 % sustainable?
 Do existing practices of 'sustainable' architecture can be taken forward or some
redefining of sustainablity is needed?
 To what extent current technologies can help in achieving your 'redefined' goal of
sustainablity?
 Last but not least, any man made practice is hardly sustainable!