Cookie Notice

We use cookies to personalise content, ads and other features.Cookie Policy

Accept Cookies

Cookie Settings

Skip to main content

EXPLORE

 Encyclopedias almanacs transcripts and maps

 Cramer v. United States 325 U.S. 1 (1945)

Cramer v. United States 325 U.S. 1 (1945)

Updated Dec 25 2019About encyclopedia.com content

Cramer V. United States 325 U.S. 1 (1945)

Views 1,239,758 Updated Dec 25 2019

CRAMER v. UNITED STATES 325 U.S.

1 (1945)
On the night of June 12, 1942, several specially trained saboteurs were put ashore from a
German submarine near Amagansett, New York, with orders to disperse throughout
the United States and to sabotage the American war effort. Anthony Cramer, a naturalized
American citizen of German background, befriended two of the saboteurs, met with them,
and was suspected of assisting them in their mission. However, the only overt acts to
which two witnesses could testify were two meetings between Cramer and one of the
saboteurs, who was an old friend of Cramer's. The prosecution was unable to produce the
testimony of two witnesses concerning what took place at the meetings or to establish that
Cramer gave information, encouragement, shelter, or supplies to the saboteurs. Cramer
was tried for and convicted of treason, and he appealed his conviction to the Supreme
Court.
 The Cramer case marked the first time that the Supreme Court passed on the meaning of
the treason clause of Article III, section 2, of the Constitution. Justice robert h. jackson,
for a 5–4 Court, held that the overt acts testified to by two witnesses must be sufficient, in
their setting, to sustain a finding that actual aid and comfort was given to an enemy of
the United States. Although there was other evidence of Cramer's Nazi sympathies and of
his assistance to the saboteur, the overt acts—the meetings—were not in themselves
treasonable, and the conviction could not stand.

Dennis J. Mahoney
(1986)

(see also: Haupt v. United States; Quirin, Ex Parte.)

Bibliography
Belknap, Michal R. 1980 The Supreme Court Goes to War: The Meaning and
Implications of the Nazi Saboteur Case. Military Law Review 89:59–95.
Encyclopedia of the American Constitution

Footer menu
 HOME

 ABOUT US

 HELP

 SITE FEEDBACK

 PRIVACY & COOKIE POLICY

 TERMS AND CONDITIONS

 DAILY

×
© 2019 Encyclopedia.com | All rights reserved.

AN ELITE CAFEMEDIA PUBLISHER