You are on page 1of 6

Ceramics International 44 (2018) 8576–8581

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

Ceramics International
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ceramint

Synthesis and characterization of cobalt ferrite nanoparticles prepared by T


the glycine-nitrate process

Ali Malekia, , Nazanin Hosseinib, AliReza Taherizadehb,c
a
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan 8415683111, Iran
b
Research Institute for Steel, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan 8415683111, Iran
c
Institute of Ceramic, Glass and Construction Materials, TU Bergakademie Freiberg, Germany

A R T I C L E I N F O A B S T R A C T

Keywords: In this research, microstructural evolution and magnetic properties of cobalt ferrite spinel (CoFe2O4) were
Cobalt ferrite studied. The ferrite was prepared by the glycine-nitrate process (GNP) followed by calcination process, and
Glycine-nitrate process subsequent high energy mechanical milling. The samples were characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), field
Magnetic properties emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM), and vibration sample magnetometery (VSM) methods. The
Single domain size
results showed that the desired high purity spinel phase was formed through a complete combustion reaction
using the G/N ratio of 1.48. The as-synthesized powder revealed the coercivity and saturation magnetization of
900 Oe and 62.83 emu/g, respectively. The CoFe2O4 phase was stable after calcination at 500 °C for 2 h under
argon atmosphere and subsequent milling processes for 2 and 4 h. The highest coercivity value was obtained for
the calcined sample (975 Oe), whose average particle size exhibited noticeable conformity with the single
magnetic domain size of CoFe2O4 (~ 40 nm). For the 2 h-milled and 4 h-milled samples, the average particle size
was below the single magnetic domain size, causing a significant reduction in coercivity values (820 and 770 Oe,
respectively). The saturation magnetization was increased negligibly after the calcination process (63.22 emu/
g), while it was raised to 71.47 and 73.98 emu/g after 2 and 4 h milling, probably due to the cationic redis-
tribution during milling.

1. Introduction structural formula of CoFe2O4 is:


(Co12−+iFei3 +)[Coi2 +Fe23−+i] O42 −,
In recent decades, there has been significant progress in the field of
magnetic nanoparticles science with the uniform size distribution due where the round and square brackets belong to tetrahedral and octa-
to their unique magnetic properties [1]. As an example, stable sus- hedral lattice sites, respectively. Moreover, i is the inversion degree
pensions of superparamagnetic nanoparticles, known as magnetic fluids signifying the fraction of tetrahedral sites (A-sites) occupied by Fe3+
(or ferrofluids), are important candidates for numerous industrial ap- cations. In the case of the normal spinel structure, Co2+ and Fe3+ ca-
plications [2]. An important category of magnetic materials is spinel tions occupy tetrahedral and octahedral sites, respectively (i = 0). As
ferrites, which can be used for various applications such as magnetic for the inverse spinel structure, Fe3+ ions sit on tetrahedral sites, while
recording media [3], biomedicine (e.g. cellular labeling or cell se- octahedral sites (B-sites) are filled by the remaining Co2+ and Fe3+ ions
paration, contrast enhancers in magnetic resonance imaging, drug de- (i = 1) [11]. It should be noted that CoFe2O4 usually reveals a mixed
livery, tissue repair, etc.) [4], microwave devices [5], and permanent spinel structure (0 < i < 1) comprising Co2+ and Fe3+ cations on both
magnets [6]. It has been reported in the literature that the magnetic tetrahedral and octahedral sites [12]. It is well known that the magnetic
properties of spinel ferrite nanoparticles synthesized by the sol–gel properties of cobalt ferrite are considerably influenced by such factors
process, mechanochemical synthesis, or other techniques are sig- as sample preparation and the synthesis method used [10,13], cobalt
nificantly different from those of their bulk materials [7]. Cobalt ferrite content [10], crystallite (particle) size [10,13,14], and cation dis-
(CoFe2O4) is one of the most commonly investigated magnetic spinel tribution [13,14]. It has also been reported that the synthesis method
ferrites exhibiting such unique properties as high coercivity, magneto- has a considerable effect on cation distribution inside the lattice of
crystalline anisotropy, chemical stability, moderate saturation magne- CoFe2O4 nanoparticles. For instance, Sato Turtelli et al. [12] in-
tization, wear resistance, and electrical insulation [8–10]. The vestigated the quantity of Co2+ cations in octahedral sites for CoFe2O4


Corresponding author.
E-mail address: maleki110@cc.iut.ac.ir (A. Maleki).

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.02.063
Received 3 January 2018; Received in revised form 6 February 2018; Accepted 6 February 2018
Available online 07 February 2018
0272-8842/ © 2018 Elsevier Ltd and Techna Group S.r.l. All rights reserved.
A. Maleki et al. Ceramics International 44 (2018) 8576–8581

prepared by sol-gel (SG) and ball milling (BM) methods. Their results βcosθ = kλ / d + ηsinθ , (1)
showed that the quantity of Co2+ in the octahedral sites of the SG
where β is the full width at the half maximum (FWHM) of XRD peaks, θ
sample was less than that in the BM sample, causing the smaller sa-
is the diffraction angle, k is the Scherrer constant (0.9), η is the strain,
turation magnetization in the BM sample, as compared with the SG
and λ is the X-ray wavelength. When βcosθ was plotted against sinθ
sample. Various preparation techniques such as sol-gel method
using all ferrite peaks, a straight line was obtained with the slope of η
[9,14,15], microemulsion [16], chemical co-precipitation [17], hydro-
and the y-intercept of 0.9λ / d . The morphology of calcined and ball-
thermal synthesis [18,19], microwave synthesis [20], mechanical mil-
milled powders was characterized by FESEM (TESCAN, Czech Re-
ling [21,22], and combustion synthesis methods [10,23] have been
public). The micrographs was used not only for qualitative observation
studied and employed to synthesize CoFe2O4 nanoparticles. Among
of the particles morphology, but also for quantitative image analysis of
them, the combustion synthesis route has received more attention for
each specimen by image J software. The reported particle size was the
preparing multi-component metal oxide nanoparticles, especially spinel
average of at least 60 individual particles diameter measurement. The
cobalt ferrites [10,11,23–25]. This arises from its relatively inexpensive
results of Williamson-Hall and image analysis methods were compared
precursor, high energy efficiency, short reaction time, and its moderate
in results and discussion. Additionally, the magnetic properties of all
heating temperature. In general, the combustion reaction occurs be-
samples were measured using a vibration sample magnetometer (VSM,
tween metal nitrates as the oxidizing agents and organic fuels as the
Meghnatis Kavir Kashan Co., Iran) at room temperature.
reducing agents. Given the fact that the fuel plays an important role in
the morphology and phase formation of the final product, the fuel and
3. Results and discussion
fuel to oxidant ratio must be selected carefully [14].
Glycine is a promising candidate used as an organic fuel in the
The stoichiometric G/N ratio was calculated based on the principle
combustion synthesis method. Actually, glycine-nitrate combustion
of propellant chemistry [30,31], considering the fact that the total
process (GNP) is performed by the self-combustion of glycine and metal
oxidizing and reducing valence of the oxidizers (metal nitrates) and fuel
nitrate, thus yielding high purity complex metal oxide powders with a
should be equal. The valence of reducing agents such as H, C, Co and Fe
uniform composition [26,27] and a nano-scale structure [26]. However,
was + 1, + 4, + 2 and + 3, respectively, whereas O was the oxidizing
most studies on the synthesis of spinel cobalt ferrite by using the
element with the valence of − 2; also, the valence of N was considered
combustion method have been focused on the application of urea as an
zero. Regarding the mentioned individual valencies, the total oxidizing
organic fuel [10,11,23,25], while fabrication of CoFe2O4 by GNP is
valence (− 10 for Co(NO3)2 and − 30 for 2Fe(NO3)3) should be ba-
rarely reported. Therefore, CoFe2O4 magnetic nanoparticles were syn-
lanced by the total reducing valence in the glycine (+ 9). To release the
thesized via GNP and characterized in this research. Moreover, the ef-
maximum energy during the combustion reaction, the stoichiometric
fects of the calcination process and the subsequent mechanical milling
composition of the redox mixture had to satisfy − 40 + 9 × =0,
on magnetic properties have been discussed in details.
yielding x = 4.44 mol of glycine. Therefore, to prepare 1 mol of
CoFe2O4, the appropriate molar ratio of reactants was 1:2:4.44 of Co
2. Experimental
(NO3)2·6H2O, Fe(NO3)3·9H2O, and CH2NH2COOH; they reacted ac-
cording to the following reaction:
2.1. CoFe2O4 synthesis
Co (NO3)2 . 6H2 O + 2Fe (NO3)3 . 9H2 O + 4.44CH2 NH2 COOH + 0.5O2
Powder of CoFe2O4 nanoparticle was synthesized by GNP, based on
→ CoFe2 O4 + 35.1H2 O + 8.88CO2 + 6.22N2 + 0.51O2 (2)
the method reported in [28]. The analytical grades of Iron nitrate (Fe
(NO3)3·9H2O, Merk, 98%), cobalt nitrate (Co(NO3)2·6H2O, Iran Chem- This reaction indicated that the stoichiometric G/N ratio was 1.48.
istry, 99.9%), and glycine (CH2NH2COOH, Applichem, 98.5%) were The diffractogram of the as-synthesized powder is illustrated in
used as the raw materials in air without any protective atmosphere. To Fig. 1(a). It was obvious that the combustion had occurred at the
achieve a transparent aqueous solution, a small quantity of deionized stoichiometric ratio, leading to the formation of the desired cubic
water was added to a predetermined quantity of nitrates and glycine; CoFe2O4 spinel phase with a lattice parameter of ~ 8.3919 Ȧ . Since
this was followed by stirring for 30 min. To remove the excess water there was no peak of the reactants in the diffractogram, the reaction
and obtain a viscous gel (precursor), the solution was heated on a hot seemed to be complete. It was also noteworthy that there was no evi-
plate. Consequently, the temperature of the solution was gradually in- dence of any undesired phase in the XRD pattern of the as-synthesized
creased, leading to a spontaneous autoignition reaction in the precursor powder, indicating the high purity of the synthesized spinel. By con-
that was accompanied by the release of a large volume of the gaseous sidering all peaks of CoFe2O4, the average grain size of the as-synthe-
phase. The product was further ground in a mortar. It is worth noting sized powder was calculated to be ~ 28 nm based on Williamson-Hall
that the total combustion reaction took around 20 min to complete,
while the reaction duration after ignition was around 4–5 s. Then, the
as-synthesized powder was calcined at 500 ℃ for 2 h under argon at-
mosphere to eliminate any residual glycine, nitrates, or their undesir-
able decomposition products. The calcined powders were then ball
milled for 2 and 4 h in a high energy Spex mill using a stainless steel vial
and steel balls with the diameter of ~ 5 mm and the ball-to-powder
weight ratio of 10:1.

2.2. Characterization

XRD patterns of as-synthesized, calcined and ball-milled powders


were recorded in the 2 θ range of 10–100° (the scan speed of 3°/min)
using a Philips diffractometer (40 kV) with CuK α radiation
(λ = 0.15406 nm) to investigate structural changes after the above-
mentioned treatments. The average grain size (d) of cobalt ferrite was
estimated from broadening of XRD peaks using Williamson–Hall for- Fig. 1. Diffractogram of CoFe2O4 powder: (a) as-synthesized, (b) calcined, (c) 2 h-milled,
and (d) 4 h-milled.
mula [29], as follows:

8577
A. Maleki et al. Ceramics International 44 (2018) 8576–8581

method. Indeed, using glycine as the fuel in GNP caused the formation morphology (Fig. 2(c)). The average particle size was estimated to be ~
of a uniform mixture at atomic or molecular level prior to combustion. 40 nm (Fig. 2(d)) after calcination, which was very close to the esti-
It was mainly due to the chemical formula of glycine, which contained a mated average grain size (~ 41 nm).
carboxylic group at one end and an amino group at the other end, re- During milling, the foam-like morphology was changed to a flake-
sulting in the completion of the nucleation process through the domi- like one. The flake-like particles were considerably smaller than the
nant mechanism of rearrangement and short-distance diffusion of the foam-like ones and each flake contained aggregates of nanosize spinel
adjacent atoms during the autoignition (~ 4–5 s). As a result, the na- particles (Fig. 3(a) and (c)). By taking into account the higher magni-
nostructured cobalt ferrite powder was obtained via GNP. Additionally, fication micrographs (Fig. 3(b) and (d)), one could conclude that the
the long-distance diffusion of atoms and the significant grain growth average particle size after 2 and 4 h milling was ~ 29 nm and ~ 22 nm,
were hindered during GNP, because the combustion reaction rate was respectively. It is worth noting that the relatively low temperature of
high enough to maintain the stability of the initial nanostructure [32]. the GNP reaction and the subsequent calcination process, as well as the
As shown in Fig. 1(b), the XRD pattern of the calcined sample in- very short time of autoignition, resulted in the formation of weak ag-
dicated no new peak, emphasizing the stability of CoFe2O4 after calci- glomerates which could be broken easily to fine particles by conducting
nation at 500 ℃ for 2 h under argon atmosphere. Generally, crystalline short milling times.
modification and subsequent grain growth are accompanied by the To evaluate the influence of calcination and mechanical milling on
calcination process, causing a negligible increase in the peaks intensity the magnetic behavior of the synthesized CoFe2O4, the magnetic hys-
[33,34]. The average grain size of the calcined powder was estimated to teresis loop was measured, as shown in Fig. 4. The magnetic properties
be ~ 41 nm via Eq. (2). For 2 h-milled and 4 h-milled samples (Fig. 1(c) of each sample, including coercivity (Hc) and saturation magnetization
& (d)), the peaks intensity was slightly decreased after milling, which (Ms), as extracted from Fig. 4, along with their average grain and par-
could be attributed to the grain refinement phenomenon (~ 31 nm and ticle size, are listed in Table 1. By considering the data related to the
~ 22 nm, respectively). In addition, according to the XRD patterns of average grain and particle size in Table 1, it could be anticipated that
the milled samples, the nanostructured powder of cobalt ferrite was a each spinel particle would contain a single grain.
stable phase not affected by milling. According to the literature [36,37], the experimental investigation
The porous or foam-like morphology of the as-synthesized powder is on the relationship between coercivity and particle size can be sche-
shown in Fig. 2(a). Such porous agglomerates are mainly formed due to matically depicted in Fig. 5.
the release of a large volume of gaseous products during GNP [34,35]. Fig. 5 reveals that coercivity could be decreased by increasing the
As shown by the magnified micrograph (Fig. 2(b)), the approximate particle size in the multidomain region, or by decreasing the particle
average particle size of nanosize spinel, which was highly agglomerated size in the single domain region. On the other words, when the particle
and difficult to be distinguished separately, was expected to be ~ size is less than single magnetic domain limit, the spinel ferrite nano-
30 nm. This was in a good agreement with the value of the average particles can behave as a superparamagnetic material [22]. The critical
grain size (~ 28 nm) obtained for the as-synthesized powder. It is worth particle size (Dc), below which the multidomain material changes to the
noting that the calcination process did not alter the foam-like single domain material, is around 40 nm for CoFe2O4 spinel [37–39].

Fig. 2. The morphology of CoFe2O4 powder: a, b) as-synthesized, and c, d) calcined.

8578
A. Maleki et al. Ceramics International 44 (2018) 8576–8581

Fig. 3. SEM micrograph of a, b) 2 h-milled, and c, d) 4 h-milled CoFe2O4 powders.

Fig. 5. The relationship between coercivity H (Oe) and the particle size D (nm) [37].

Fig. 4. The hysteresis loops of CoFe2O4 powders with different conditions.


For multidomain materials (D > Dc), the domain wall movement is the
main mechanism for the change of magnetization, causing the reduc-
Table 1
tion of coercivity with the particle size increase [39]. In this study, the
The coercivity, saturation magnetization, average grain size, and particle size of CoFe2O4
samples. average particle size (grain size) of the as-synthesized powder was ~
30 nm, which was below the reported Dc (~ 40 nm). It was increased up
CoFe2O4 Sample Hc (Oe) Ms (emu/ g ) Average grain Measured to ~ 40 nm after the calcination process at 500 °C for 2 h under argon
size (nm) based average
atmosphere, which was close to the value mentioned for the single
on Williamson- particle size
Hall method (nm) domain size of spinel cobalt ferrite; consequently, coercivity was in-
creased moderately (Table 1). Actually, this increase was due to the fact
As-synthesized 900 62.83 ~ 28 ~ 30 that the change of magnetization in this condition could not occur only
Calcined 975 63.22 ~ 41 ~ 40
by shifting the domain walls, which would normally happen in a weak
2 h-milled 820 71.47 ~ 31 ~ 29
4 h-milled 770 73.98 ~ 22 ~ 22
magnetic field [37]. After milling for 2 and 4 h, coercivity was notice-
ably decreased, reaching the value of 820 and 770 Oe, respectively. It

8579
A. Maleki et al. Ceramics International 44 (2018) 8576–8581

seemed that the reduction of the average particle size during milling cationic redistribution during milling in this study, which was followed
(see Table 1) below the single domain size could be the main reason for by the observed increasing trend of saturation magnetization.
this phenomenon. As stated before, in this condition, the magnetic
behavior of spinel ferrite nanoparticles turned to a superparamagnetic 4. Conclusions
one (Fig. 5). The particle size (grain size) for CoFe2O4 to become mostly
superparamagnetic is ~ 12 nm, in which the coercivity is zero [13]. In In this paper, the structural evolution and magnetic properties of
fact, as the particle size is reduced to a certain value (~ 12 nm for cobalt ferrite spinel powders synthesized through the GNP method
CoFe2O4), the ferromagnetic behavior is converted to a super- followed by the calcination process were investigated at 500 °C for 2 h
paramagnetic one. At this condition, the room temperature thermal under argon atmosphere, and high energy mechanical milling for 2 and
energy overcomes the magnetostatic energy of the domain or the par- 4 h. The findings could be summarized here:
ticles, exhibiting the zero hysteresis [37,40].
The second important observation in the hysteresis loops was the 1. The desired cubic CoFe2O4 spinel phase with high purity was formed
change in the saturation magnetization (Ms) of the milled samples. through a complete combustion reaction using the stoichiometric G/
According to Fig. 4 and Table 1, Ms exhibited a marginal increase upon N ratio of 1.48. The foam-like morphology of the as-synthesized
the calcination process (~ 63.22 emu/g), while after 2 and 4 h milling, powder contained nanosize spinel particles (~ 30 nm) which were
it was remarkably increased to 71.47 and 73.98 emu/g, respectively. highly agglomerated.
The saturation magnetization is generally expected to decrease for the 2. The foam-like morphology was retained during the calcination
finer grains as a result of the so called “dead” surface effect [13]. Ac- process and the average particle size was increased to ~ 40 nm.
tually, the “dead” surface is associated with the disorder of surface However, short-time milling of 2 and 4 h changed the morphology
spins. Based on this effect, when the grain size is decreased during into a flake-like one with the average particle size of ~ 29 nm and ~
milling, the number of surface spins is increased, thereby causing a 22 nm, respectively.
subsequent reduction in Ms. However, the Ms values obtained in this 3. The average particle size of the calcined powder could be matched
study were not consistent with this explanation. Here, it seemed that a well with the reported value of the single magnetic domain size for
combination of surface effect [41] and redistribution of magnetic ca- cobalt ferrite in the literature (40 nm), where the coercivity value
tions [12] could be the possible mechanism for the variation of sa- reached its highest value (975 Oe).
turation magnetization. It is important to note that the magnetic mo- 4. The average particle size of 2 h-milled and 4 h-milled samples was
ments of cations in the tetrahedral (A-site) and octahedral (B-site) sites decreased below the single magnetic domain size; therefore, the
of spinel cobalt ferrite were aligned in an antiparallel manner. In an magnetic behavior gradually turned to a superparamagnetic one,
ideal inverse spinel cobalt ferrite, where half of Fe3+ cations are located and this was followed by the reduction of coercivity values (820 and
in A-sites and the other half occupy B-sites, the magnetic contribution 770 Oe, respectively).
of Fe3+ cations with the magnetic moment of 5 μB is mutually com- 5. The saturation magnetization of the as-synthesized powder was
pensated. Thus, the Co2+ cations with the magnetic moment of 3 μB, as 62.83 emu/g, and this was followed by a negligible increase after
located in B-sites, are the only source of the net magnetic moment in the calcination (63.22 emu/g). However, it was noticeably increased to
ideal inverse spinel cobalt ferrite [12,42]. However, as already men- 71.47 and 73.98 emu/g after 2 h and 4 h milling, respectively. This
tioned, CoFe2O4 is usually a mixed spinel representing Co2+ and Fe3+ was mainly attributed to the cationic redistribution and the sub-
cations in both A-sites and B-sites ((Co12−+i Fei3 +)[Coi2 +Fe23−+i] O42 −). The sequent reduction of the inversion degree during milling.
general formula of the net magnetic moment per unit formula of 6. It seemed that the reduction in the inversion degree during milling
CoFe2O4 as a function of inversion degree can be expressed as [12]: (less Co2+ cations in B-sites) resulted in the decrease of magneto-
μ = μB − sites − μA − sites  =   {[3i+5(2−i)] − (5i+3(1−i))}(μB ) = (7 − 4i) μB , crystalline anisotropy and consequently, coercivity values.

(3) References
where μ is the net magnetic moment of the material, and μA − sites and
μB − sites are the magnetic moments of cations in A- and B-sites, respec- [1] X. Batlle, A. Labarta, Finite-size effect in fine particles: magnetic and transport
tively. By increasing the inversion degree due to the movement of Co2+ properties, J. Phys. D 35 (2002) R15–R42.
[2] R. Rosenweig, Ferrohydrodynamics, Cambridge Unversity Press, Cambridge, 1932.
cations from A-sites to B-sites and consequently, Fe3+ cations from B- [3] J.L. Simonds, Magnetoelectronics today and tomorrow, Phys. Today 48 (1995)
sites to A-sites, the net magnetic moment could be decreased and this 26–32.
would occur along with the corresponding reduction in saturation [4] U. Hafeli, W. Schut, J. Teller, M. Zborowski, Scientific and Clinical Applications of
Magnetic Carriers, Kluwer Academic Press/Plenum Publishers, Amsterdam, 1997.
magnetization. On the contrary, if the opposite phenomenon occurs, the [5] M. Pardavi-Horvath, Microwave applications of soft ferrites, J. Magn. Magn. Mater.
saturation magnetization could be increased. 215–216 (2000) 171–183.
According to Table 1 and the aforementioned discussion, it seemed [6] G. Nabiyouni, M. Jafari Fesharaki, M. Mozafari, J. Amighian, Characterization and
magnetic properties of nickel ferrite nanoparticles prepared by ball milling tech-
that during milling for 2 and 4 h, the inversion degree was decreased as
nique, Chin. Phys. Lett. 27 (2010) 126401(1)–126401(4).
a result of the change in the cationic redistribution, bringing about a [7] C.N. Chinnasamy, A. Narayanasamy, N. Ponpandian, K. Chattopadhyay,
gradual increase in the net magnetic moment and subsequently, the H. Guerault, J.M. Greneche, Magnetic properties of nanostructured ferrimagnetic
zinc ferrite, J. Phys.: Condens. Mater. 12 (2000) 7795–7805.
saturation magnetization. Moreover, it has been explained in the lit-
[8] K.S. Rao, G.S.V.R.K. Choudary, K.H. Rao, Ch Sujatha, Structural and magnetic
erature that less Co2+ cations in B-sites (smaller inversion degree) properties of ultrafine CoFe2O4 nanoparticles, Proc. Mater. Sci. 10 (2015) 19–27.
could decrease the magneto-crystalline anisotropy and consequently, [9] W.P. Wang, H. Yang, T. Xian, J.L. Jiang, XPS and magnetic properties of CoFe2O4
decrease the coercivity values [12]. This is consistent with the results of nanoparticles synthesized by a polyacrylamide gel route, Mater. Trans. 53 (2012)
1586–1589.
coercivity achieved in this study (see Table 1). Recently, Ponce et al. [10] A. Franco, F.C. e Silva, High temperature magnetic properties of cobalt ferrite na-
[42] have indicated that milling of CoFe2O4 nanoparticles prepared via noparticles, Appl. Phys. Lett. 96 (2010) 172505(1)–172505(3).
a hydrothermal method leads to the cationic redistribution. Actually, [11] Z. Zhou, Y. Zhang, Z. Wang, W. Wei, W. Tang, J. Shi, R. Xiong, Electronic structure
studies of the spinel CoFe2O4 by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, Appl. Surf. Sci.
the saturation magnetization of the unmilled sample was measured to 254 (2008) 6972–6975.
be 69.5 emu/g, whereas milling with zirconia balls up to 1.5 h resulted [12] R. Sato Turtelli, M. Atif, N. Mehmood, F. Kubel, K. Biernacka, W. Linert,
in an increase of saturation magnetization to 71.4 emu/g. Additionally, R. Grössinger, Interplay between the cation distribution and production methods in
cobalt ferrite, Mater. Chem. Phys. 132 (2012) 832–838.
the cation swap between magnetic A- and B- sites in the normal spinel [13] A. Franco, F.C. e. Silva, V.S. Zapf, High temperature magnetic properties of Co1-
ferrite ZnFe2O4 due to the mechanical milling has been observed by xMgxFe2O4 nanoparticles prepared by forced hydrolysis method, J. Appl. Phys. 111
Stewart et al. [43]. These two researches are in agreement with the (2012) 07B530(1)–07B530(3).

8580
A. Maleki et al. Ceramics International 44 (2018) 8576–8581

[14] R.S. Yadav, J. Havlica, M. Hnatko, P. Šajgalík, C. Alexander, M. Palou, combustion synthesis of oxide ceramic powders, Mater. Lett. 10 (1990) 6–12.
E. Bartoníčková, M. Boháč, F. Frajkorováa, Magnetic properties of Co1-xZnxFe2O4 [29] G.K. Williamson, W.H. Hall, X-ray line broadening from field aluminium and wol-
spinel ferrite nanoparticles synthesized by starch-assisted sol–gel autocombustion fram, Acta Metall. 1 (1953) 22–31.
method and its ball milling, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 378 (2015) 190–199. [30] A.F. Junior, T.E.P. Alves, E.C.O. Lima, E.S. Nunes, V. Zapf, Enhanced magnetization
[15] M. Shi, R.Z. Zuo, Y.D. Xu, Y.Z. Jiang, G.Y. Yu, H.L. Su, J.G. Zhong, Preparation and of nanoparticles of MgxFe(3-x)O4 (0.5 < x < 1.5) synthesized by combustion reac-
characterization of CoFe2O4 powders and films via the sol–gel method, J. Alloy. tion, Appl. Phys. A 94 (2009) 131–137.
Compd. 512 (2012) 165–170. [31] S. Bhaduri, S.B. Bhaduri, E. Zhou, Autoignition synthesis and consolidation of
[16] S. Burianova, J.P. Vejpravova, P. Holec, J. Plocek, D. Niznansky, Surface spin effects Al2O3–ZrO2 nano/nanocomposite powders, J. Mater. Res. 13 (1998) 156–165.
in La-doped CoFe2O4 nanoparticles prepared by microemulsion route, J. Appl. [32] N.P. Bansal, Z. Zhong, Combustion synthesis of Sm0.5Sr0.5CoO3-x and
Phys. 110 (2011) 073902(1)–073902(7). La0.6Sr0.4CoO3-x nanopowders for solid oxide fuel cell cathodes, J. Power Sources
[17] Z.G. Zhu, X.Y. Li, Q.D. Zhao, Y. Shi, H. Li, G.H. Chen, Surface photovoltage prop- 158 (2006) 148–153.
erties and photocatalytic activities of nanocrystalline CoFe2O4 particles with [33] Q. Wang, R. Peng, C. Xia, W. Zhu, H. Wang, Characteristics of YSZ synthesized with
porous superstructure fabricated by a modified chemical coprecipitation method, J. a glycine–nitrate process, Ceram. Int. 34 (2008) 1773–1778.
Nanopart. Res. 13 (2011) 2147–2155. [34] B. Lin, W. Sun, K. Xie, Y. Dong, D. Dong, X. Liu, J. Gao, G. Meng, A cathode-
[18] Y. Zhang, Y. Liu, Z. Yang, R. Xiong, J. Shi, Synthesis of CoFe2O4 nanoparticles with supported SOFC with thin Ce0.8Sm0.2O1.9 electrolyte prepared by a suspension
tunable magnetism by the modified hydrothermal method, J. Nanopart. Res. 13 spray, J. Alloy. Compd. 465 (2008) 285–290.
(2011) 4557–4563. [35] R.D. Purohit, B.P. Sharma, K.T. Pillai, A.K. Tyagi, Ultrafine ceria powders via gly-
[19] J.H. Peng, M. Hojamberdiev, Y.H. Xu, B.W. Cao, J. Wang, H. Wu, Hydrothermal cine–nitrate combustion, Mater. Res. Bull. 36 (2001) 2711–2721.
synthesis and magnetic properties of gadolinium-doped CoFe2O4 nanoparticles, J. [36] E.C. Stoner, E.P. Wohlfarth, A mechanism of magnetic hysteresis in heterogeneous
Magn. Magn. Mater. 323 (2011) 133–137. alloys, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A240 (1948) 599–642.
[20] M. Ibrahim Amal, M.M. Abd El-Latif, M. Mahmoud Morsi, Synthesis and char- [37] D.S. Mathew, R.S. Juang, An overview of the structure and magnetism of spinel
acterization of nano-sized cobalt ferrite prepared via polyol method using con- ferrite nanoparticles and their synthesis in microemulsions, Chem. Eng. J. 129
ventional and microwave heating techniques, J. Alloy. Compd. 506 (2010) (2007) 51–65.
201–204. [38] C.N. Chinnasamy, B. Jeyadevan, K. Shinoda, K. Tohji, D.J. Djayaprawira,
[21] Y. Shi, J. Ding, H. Yin, CoFe2O4 nanoparticles prepared by the mechanochemical M. Takahashi, R. Justin Joseyphus, A. Narayanasamy, Unusually high coercivity
method, J. Alloy. Compd. 308 (2000) 290–295. and critical single-domain size of nearly monodispersed CoFe2O4 nanoparticles,
[22] E. Manova, B. Kunev, D. Paneva, I. Mitov, L. Petrov, Mechano-synthesis, char- Appl. Phys. Lett. 83 (2003) 2862–2864.
acterization, and magnetic properties of nanoparticles of cobalt ferrite, CoFe2O4, [39] Z.H. Hua, R.S. Chen, C.L. Li, S.G. Yang, M. Lu, B.X. Gu, Y.W. Du, CoFe2O4 nanowire
Chem. Mater. 16 (2004) 5689–5696. arrays prepared by template-electrodeposition method and further oxidization, J.
[23] A. Franco, E.C. de Oliveira Lima, M.A. Novak, P.R. Wells, Synthesis of nanoparticles Alloy. Compd. 427 (2007) 199–203.
of CoxFe(3−x)O4 by combustion reaction method, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 308 (2007) [40] S.R. Kulkarni, P.U. Londhe, N.B. Chaure, Electrical and magnetic properties of Al3+
198–202. substituted Mn–Ni–Zn nanoferrites, J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Electron. 24 (2013)
[24] F. Nakagomi, S.W. da Silva, V.K. Garg, A.C. Oliveira, P.C. Morais, A. Franco, 4186–4191.
E.C.D. Lima, The influence of cobalt population on the structural properties of [41] M. Rajendran, R.C. Pullar, A.K. Bhattacharya, D. Das, S.N. Chintalapudi,
CoxFe3- xO4, J. Appl. Phys. 101 (2007) 09M514(1)-09M514(3). C.K. Majumdar, Magnetic properties of nanocrystalline CoFe2O4 powders prepared
[25] A. Franco, F.L.A. Machado, V.S. Zapf, Magnetic properties of nanoparticles of cobalt at room temperature: variation with crystallite size, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 232
ferrite at high magnetic field, J. Appl. Phys. 110 (2011) 053913(1)–053913(5). (2001) 71–83.
[26] N. Shaigan, W. Qu, D.G. Ivey, W. Chen, A review of recent progress in coatings, [42] A.S. Ponce, E.F. Chagas, R.J. Prado, C.H.M. Fernandes, A.J. Terezo, E. Baggio-
surface modifications and alloy developments for solid oxide fuel cell ferritic Saitovitch, High coercivity induced by mechanical milling in cobalt ferrite powders,
stainless steel interconnects, J. Power Sources 195 (2010) 1529–1542. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 344 (2013) 182–187.
[27] D.H. Prasad, J.W. Sona, B.K. Kim, H.W. Lee, J.H. Lee, A significant enhancement in [43] S.J. Stewart, S.J.A. Figueroa, J.M. Ramallo López, S.G. Marchetti, J.F. Bengoa,
sintering activity of nanocrystalline Ce0.9Gd0.1O1.95 powder synthesized by a gly- R.J. Prado, F.G. Requejo, Cationic exchange in nanosized ZnFe2O4 spinel revealed
cine–nitrate-process, J. Ceram. Process. Res. 11 (2010) 176–183. by experimental and simulated near-edge absorption structure, Phys. Rev. B 75
[28] L.A. Chick, L.R. Pederson, G.D. Maupin, J.L. Bates, L.E. Thomas, Glycine–nitrate (2007) 073408 (1)-073408(4).

8581

You might also like