Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Classical
A nalysis
Volume 12, Number 1 (2018), 1–7 doi:10.7153/jca-2018-12-01
in terms of the polygamma functions, where k is any given positive integer. Based on this result,
we present an asymptotic formula as n → ∞ and an integral representation for this sum.
1. Introduction
Izán Péraz, in a private communication to the first author, formulated the following
limit:
1 1 √
lim
n→∞ n
∑ (n + i)(n + j) = 6 − 4 2. (1.1)
1i< jn
where in this section the index r > 0 is an arbitrary real quantity, but will subsequently
be restricted to be a positive integer.
It is easy to see that
2 2
n n n
1 1 1 n 1
n 2r−2
∑∑ r = n ∑
r−1
r
= ∑ 1 + i r .
i=1 j=1 (n + i)(n + j) i=1 (n + i) n i=1 n
c , Zagreb 1
Paper JCA-12-01
2 C HAO -P ING C HEN AND R ICHARD B. PARIS
2. An asymptotic formula as n → ∞
We first show how the double sum Sk (n) can be evaluated in terms of polygamma
functions. We have the following theorem.
T HEOREM 2.1. For positive integer k , the sum Sk (n) has the following analytical
representation:
2
1 ψ (k−1) (2n + 1) − ψ (k−1)(n + 1)
Sk (n) =
2 (k − 1)!
ψ (2k−1) (2n + 1) − ψ (2k−1)(n + 1)
+ . (2.1)
(2k − 1)!
Proof. The polygamma function has the expression (see [2, Eq. 1.2(54)] and [3,
Eq. 1.3(54)])
m
1
ψ (n) (x + m) = ψ (n) (x) + (−1)n n! ∑ (x + j − 1)n+1
, m, n = 0, 1, 2, . . . . (2.2)
j=1
We then obtain
2
n n n
1 1
∑∑ k = ∑ (n + j)k
i=1 j=1 (n + i)(n + j) j=1
2
ψ (k−1) (2n + 1) − ψ (k−1)(n + 1)
= . (2.3)
(k − 1)!
T HEOREM 2.2. For k = 1, 2, . . ., the sum Sk (n) has the asymptotic expansion
1 C1 (k) C2 (k)
Sk (n) = 2k−2 C0 (k) + + 2 + O(n−3) (2.5)
2n n n
2
1 − 2−k 1 − 2−2k k(1 − 2−1−k )(1 − 21−k )
C2 (k) = + + . (2.6)
2 2 6(k − 1)
When k = 1 , we have
1 1
C0 (1) = (ln 2)2 , C1 (1) = − (1 + ln 2), C2 (1) = (7 + 2 ln 2). (2.7)
2 16
Proof. To demonstrate (2.5), we require the asymptotic formula [1, Eq. (6.4.11)]
∞
(k − 1)! k! (2s + k − 1)!
(−1)k+1 ψ (k) (x) ∼
x k
+
2x k+1
+ ∑ B2s
(2s)!x2s+k
(2.8)
s=1
as n → ∞, where
1 − 21−k 1 1
A0 (k) = , A1 (k) = − (1 − 2−k ), A2 (k) = (1 − 2−1−k ).
k−1 2 12
where
2
1 − 21−k
C0 (k) = A0 (k)2 = ,
k−1
(1 − 2−k )(1 − 21−k ) 1 − 21−2k
C1 (k) = 2A0 (k)A1 (k) − A0 (2k) = − − ,
k−1 2k − 1
C2 (k) = A1 (k)2 + 2A0(k)A2 (k) − A1 (2k)
1 − 2−k 2 1 − 2−2k k(1 − 2−1−k )(1 − 21−k )
= + + .
2 2 6(k − 1)
to find
1 1 1 3
Ψ1 (n, 1) = ln 2 − + + O(n−3 ), Ψ2 (n, 1) = − + + O(n−3 ).
4n 16n2 2n 8n2
Hence we obtain
(ln 2)2 1 + ln 2 7 + 2 ln 2
S1 (n) = − + + O(n−3) (n → ∞).
2 4n 32n2
This completes the proof.
1 − 21−k
lim = ln 2,
k→1 k − 1
we see that the limiting values of the coefficients Cs (k) in (2.6) as k → 1 agree with
those given in (2.7).
6 C HAO -P ING C HEN AND R ICHARD B. PARIS
In this section we obtain an integral representation for the sum Sk (n). We have
where
∞
1 2−k 1
I(n, k) = − t k−1 e−nt dt.
Γ(k) 0 et/2 − 1 et − 1
Proof. Using the representation [1, Eq. (6.4.1)] for positive integer n
∞ n −xt
(n) n+1 t e
ψ (x) = (−1) dt (x > 0),
0 1 − e−t
we find
∞ n −xt
t e
ψ (n) (x + 1) = (−1)n+1 dt (3.2)
0 et − 1
and
∞ n −xt
(−1)n+1 t e
ψ (n) (2x + 1) = dt. (3.3)
2n+1 0 et/2 − 1
We then obtain
∞ 2
1 2−k 1 k−1 −nt
Ψ21 (n, k) + Ψ2 (n, k) = − t e dt
Γ(k)
0 et/2 − 1 et − 1
∞
1 2−2k 1
+ − t t 2k−1 e−nt dt. (3.4)
Γ(2k) 0 e −1 e −1
t/2
Finally, substituting the expression (3.4) into (2.1) yields (2.5). This completes the
proof.
The case k = 1 is covered by the following theorem.
REFERENCES