Any ad [Soa oxo sroe] s0ep.0q9y 90 “ens so unvaisy saovave ouuno}oay wong] SOU SASaUHOd am ‘szunrvoreusoigsod| pr pur Tworan( 433934) HM JaNOWVI0 Wns wiley Twnouvn|_, WAM sania aad mer iv wos 120.9 sannouna 3 fos yo hdco én mone cxsivs0s0 onsoy ON 8S€3 YON-DHIN “AND| Tad OD1N3/INI uozand “pig uewyo0g] ‘SONBOU “SA SNONND| WINOISSINWOD Aauiawv/sant renner | suo | "INI SOUBOY :AN3IDpurposes of settlement and the submission of the parties’ respective position paper was scheduled on May 18, 2018 at 2 PM. A copy of the minutes is hereby attached as Annex 4, On May 4, 2018, the mandatory conference was terminated by this Honorable Office for failure of the respondents to appear. As indicated in the minutes of the conference, the parties were directed to submit their respective verified position paper within ten (10) days or on. May 21, 2018 at 2:00 PM because the tenth day falls on a Saturday. A copy of the minutes is hereby attached as Annex “4” 5, The Order of this Honorable Office requiring the parties to submit their respective position paper on 21 May 2018 was received by the respondents only on 7 June 2018. A copy of the logbook record evidencing the same is hereby attached as Annex “5”. 6. Immediately upon receipt of the above Order, respondents engaged the undersigned counsel for this case. Respondents humbly: request that this Motion to Admit Position Paper and Reply be admitted tor the following reasons: The_undersigned is entitled to due process of law. 7. Theessence of due process in administrative cases cannot be over emphasized.! In Fontanilla v. The Commission Proper’ the Honorable Supreme Court held: "If_a person has not been giver the cppotity to squarely and intelligently oP eer accusations or rebut the evidence presented against him, or raise substantive Uefences through the proper pleadings before a quasi-judicial body (like the COA) where he or she stands charged, then a due process problem exists. This problem worsens and the Flenial of his most basic right continues if, sn the first place, he is found liable without the iat ee paged ane this finding, confirmed in the appeal or reconsideration process without allowing him to rebut or SES eee TG No. 209724, june 22,2086Qresey, as Sekewng sues A fo arises ssvpni ‘Auadorg 0 a8ewieg 01 Buninsas 22uapniduy) ssapyay) ~ pareuusar wuas| oe oeAewNS A operiay| 66} “81S0-218-YAION-aWas 301440 1WONIAOUa! OvAWMN! Wad LNBNAOLaWna| feveween [reine] aise _| OavuHaL S39 GNY Hd’SOr suNanyjs8unaery AVOVd OUOGOAL SVAIA‘N NVINGV ‘yoaroy ydtasas uodn Ajayerpaunut ao1YO alqerouop] ayy Jo UONeIAp|suD ayy 107 Jadeg Ajday pue 1adeq uonIsog paypeny Wwpy oF VoHOPY SuyoBar0y ayy Iwqns ATpury js8unaaig engty Joqey "aI" VAWN “V ONILYad “NOH :GaHSINUNA AdOD GNV ONIAVAH dO JOLLON TOT ME-GRIGSEATAE peu OSS'SEEF'S660 “ON PI!GOW (gr0z aun{ seq 0) paynupy) idwaxg ;aourrduos a1 vue -8T-€1-S0 /60€26PL ON ULd vITURW-ST-Z0-60/99Z6€0 “ON dal $9604 ON SAoUIONY 50 [10X SVAIA‘'N NVRIGV WOT MEPGnIBaqUUNGH :|reury S61 9068'Z660 ‘ON AHIOW 910z ‘0 “SnVv /ZZZEZOO-A ‘ON aourr|dwOD AIO BIIURIN -B1-0€-L0 /SPSZOLL ON ULd W1ldd-81-60-10/S08SZ0 ‘ON atUAITT dal 96509 ON SKourony JO TOU “al ‘aaVNwaa ‘cc OLNadON snsal woo me-qni@Anse seu £097 00S 2160 “ON ALGO SI-P1-8 UO pansst /g796000-A ON aourN|dwoy AION AyD BRIE /8I-60-10 / SET9T99 ‘ON Ld AND BEAL /8T-60-10 /908STO “ON PUAN] dal 6ELZS “ON SAatONY JO [0ANY, S34¥OL 01503 A113 40 a1v153| 40 ANAWIILL3S TwIDIANRALXa ‘WINOISSINWOD /suiauy/a9ant 43BWNN aS¥2/14NOD /391440 TUL ayo ‘SIUYOL O1NUNWA :LNATIDauntoay NOLL say Bunsemy| SNIONId 2g 2529 ay sonny sorrpayy 105-61-91-y55 E-Vr-2091 Law “O$4W-00%N “enue PPS MeBHeV4 £96 “uprima 2ON-3100 “LNaNnorang ONY ¥08V 40 tN ¥NOISSINWOD aug /aoant WLwvdag|