Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Mechanisms Behind The Partial Recovery in The Degraded Mechanical Properties of ASR-affected Concrete
The Mechanisms Behind The Partial Recovery in The Degraded Mechanical Properties of ASR-affected Concrete
net/publication/313797662
CITATIONS READS
0 106
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Bishnu Gautam on 17 February 2017.
ABSTRACT
Alkali silica reaction (ASR) is an undesirable chemical reaction between the alkalis available in concrete
and a particular type of aggregates that contain reactive siliceous minerals. ASR causes expansion,
cracking and degradation in mechanical properties of concrete. However, the degradation in mechanical
properties appears to be characteristically followed by a partial recovery despite an ongoing increase in
expansion. This paper is focused on discussing the mechanism behind the partial recovery. Firstly, the
mechanisms of how ASR affects the mechanical properties, namely, compressive strength, modulus of
elasticity, and tensile strength is examined. Secondly, concrete samples made with reactive aggregate are
microscopically examined to compare the cracks, debonding, and reaction products at different ages of
accelerated curing. Images are captured from polished surfaces of concrete samples and are analyzed to
understand the changes in the microstructure of concrete. The chemical compositions of the reaction
products at different stages of reaction and at different locations within concrete are investigated by
scanning electron microscope (SEM) backscattered electron imaging and SEM elemental mapping.
Findings from the present experimental study are synthesized with the literature findings to postulate the
mechanism of partial recovery in the mechanical properties.
1. Introduction
Alkali silica reaction (ASR) is a major deterioration problem in concrete structures. It causes expansion,
cracking and degradation in mechanical properties of concrete. Degradation in mechanical properties is a
critical concern since loss in strength and stiffness can jeopardize the structural integrity of concrete
structures. Many studies have focused on the loss in mechanical properties of concrete due to ASR and
have shown that different mechanical properties have different sensitivities to ASR (Swamy & Al-Asali
1988; Giaccio et al. 2008; Jones & Clark 1998).
Swamy & Al-Asali (1988) reported that the loss of modulus of rupture, modulus of elasticity and
compressive strength can be as much as 80%, 70% and 60%, respectively, due to ASR. A peculiar trend
however was noted for the compressive strength, it increased until a longitudinal expansion of
approximately 0.12% was reached and decreased thereafter. In contrast, the loss in tensile strength began
from the onset of the reaction and was severe. In a study of specimens exposed to alkali solution for 12
weeks at 80 °C, compressive strength of reactive normal strength (nominal 35 MPa) concrete reduced by
24% and increased by up to 23% for reactive high strength (nominal 80 MPa) concrete (Marzouk &
Langdon 2003). Multon et al. (2005) observed a loss of 20% in modulus of elasticity and approximately
10% increase in compressive strength after one year of testing reactive concrete at 38 °C. Giaccio et al.
(2008) reported that compressive strength of reactive concrete cylinders generally increased until the
longitudinal expansion reached 0.15% but decreased thereafter. The authors reported that fine cracks were
unable to influence the compressive strength but able to degrade the modulus of elasticity by as much as
50%. Jones & Clark (1998) observed reduction in compressive strength only after the ASR expansion
reached 0.17%. The loss in modulus of elasticity was as large as 70% and the loss in tensile strength was
up to 80%. Even without noticeable opening of micro-cracks, a substantial reduction in tensile strength
was observed (Jones & Clark 1998).
These studies suggest that the mechanisms by which different mechanical properties of concrete are
affected by ASR are different. Generally, the loss in tensile strength occurs as soon as micro-cracking
develops in concrete but the loss in compressive strength does not occur before the cracks have attained
some width and concrete has undergone an expansion exceeding approximately 0.12-0.17%. In the case of
accelerated laboratory tests, the high temperature of an accelerated curing condition contributes to the
continued hydration of cement (Multon et al. 2005; Marzouk & Langdon 2003; Gautam et al. 2015). Since
the mechanisms and rates of degradation vary for different mechanical properties and since the
degradation is often coupled with the improvement caused by the continued hydration of cement, an
understanding of the degradation mechanisms becomes complicated. Moreover, the reaction products of
ASR undergo chemical and physical changes over time (Sachlova et al. 2010; Peterson et al. 2006;
Thaulow et al. 1996; Leemann & Lura 2013). Thus, it is sometimes difficult to interpret the experimental
results aimed at investigating the loss of mechanical properties of concrete due to ASR. One particular
aspect is that of partial recovery, a slight improvement in the mechanical properties following a loss due to
ASR. The change in different mechanical properties was also observed by Panesar and Gautam in an
experimental investigation involving reactive concrete specimens (Gautam 2016). Table 1 shows the
evolution of compressive strength, modulus of elasticity and splitting tensile strength of reactive concrete
cylinders subjected to an accelerated curing environment of 50±0.5 °C and almost 100% relative
humidity.
Table 1. Mechanical properties of ASR concrete up to one year of accelerated curing (Gautam 2016)
Value (mean ± standard deviation)
Property Ref. (at 23±3 °C 3 months of 8 months of 12 months of
before accelerated accelerated accelerated accelerated
curing) curing curing curing
Compressive strength (MPa) 43.9 ± 1.6 54.0 ± 1.6 53.5 ± 1.9 54.8 ± 2.2
Modulus of elasticity (GPa) 38.2 ± 0.3 29.6 ± 0.7 31.6 ± 1.8 32.2 ± 2.5
Splitting tensile strength (MPa) 3.0 ± 0.1 2.8 ± 0.2 1.5 ± 0.05 2.3 ± 0.03
Note: the accelerated curing was performed at 50±0.5 °C and almost 100% relative humidity.
Partial recovery has been observed in many studies (Swamy & Al-Asali 1988; Bektas & Wang 2012;
Ahmed et al. 2003). Swamy & Al-Asali (1988) observed partial recovery in the tensile strength and the
dynamic modulus of elasticity of reactive concrete specimens and attributed it to the effect of the
continued hydration of cement paste. Bektas & Wang (2012) observed partial recovery in the modulus of
rupture and modulus of elasticity in the reactive concrete specimens. The authors attributed the recovery
due to the filling of cracks and voids by the reaction product. With time, the soft and fluid alkali-rich gel
becomes stable through alkali-calcium exchange and is stronger than its predecessor alkali-rich gel.
Since the mechanism of partial recovery appears as a characteristic phenomenon in the laboratory
investigation of ASR-affected concrete specimens, this study is dedicated to examine the mechanism of
partial recovery. As the mechanism of recovery follows the mechanism of damage due to ASR, this paper
microscopically examines the mechanism of damage due to ASR. Optical and digital microscope images
captured from a number of polished surfaces of concrete samples are analyzed. The chemical
compositions of the reaction products at different stages of reaction and at different locations within
concrete are investigated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), backscattered electron (BSE) imaging,
and SEM elemental mapping. The effect of pore pressure of the reaction products, the physical and
chemical changes of reaction products, and the analysis of cracks and microstructure of concrete are
utilized to elucidate the mechanism of partial recovery. The scope of this paper is not to explain the
mechanism of how the ASR cracking is formed, but is focused on the mechanism of partial recovery that
follows the damage in mechanical properties.
2. Materials and methods
3. Mechanical properties
Figure 1a shows the variation in modulus of rupture and dynamic modulus of elasticity with longitudinal
expansion of concrete prisms from Mix 1 conditioned at 38 °C and 50 °C. The mechanical properties are
presented in a scale normalized to the corresponding property when the ASR expansion was quite small
(~0.01%). ASR caused a loss in modulus of rupture by approximately 60% and a loss of approximately
25% in dynamic modulus of elasticity. As observed in Figure 1a, the loss in mechanical property
(modulus of rupture (MOR) and dynamic modulus of elasticity (Edyn)) was followed by a partial recovery
after the longitudinal expansion exceeded approximately 0.2%. Accordingly, the reaction is divided into
two stages, namely the early stage and the later stage, by a line corresponding to a longitudinal expansion
of 0.2%. Degradation in mechanical properties was prevalent in the early stage and the mechanism of
partial recovery was effective in the later stage. While the recovery in dynamic modulus of elasticity was
approximately 10%, the recovery in modulus of rupture was 34%, when compared to the lowest value (at
maximum loss). The extent of recovery is far greater than the improvement in mechanical properties due
to the effect of continued hydration, which in control prisms had been observed as 7% in dynamic
modulus of elasticity and 0% in modulus of rupture (Gautam 2016).
Figure 1b shows the variation in compressive strength and static modulus of elasticity of concrete
cylinders from Mix 2 and Mix 3, both conditioned at 38 °C. Since expansion was not measured on
cylinders, the longitudinal expansion in Figure 1b is of the concrete prisms from the corresponding mixes
and cured identically to the cylinders. Compressive strength increased until an expansion of approximately
0.15% and experienced a loss thereafter for both Mix 2 and 3. Static modulus of elasticity was observed to
reduce from the onset of measureable expansion until approximately 0.2% expansion at which time the
mean static modulus appears to remain statistically similar despite the increase in longitudinal expansion
to 0.35%.
50 40
Mechanical property (relative scale)
a) Dynamic modulus of elasticity and modulus of rupture versus b) Compressive strength and static modulus of elasticity of
longitudinal expansion for ASR-affected concrete prisms (Mix 1) concrete cylinders versus longitudinal expansion of concrete
prisms (all cured at 38 °C) of ASR-affected concrete
a) 2D image b) 3D image
4.2 Later stage: Filling of cracks and interstitial transition zone (ITZ) with reaction
products and transformation into solid products
At the later stage of the reaction, the rate of formation of reaction product will be low and there will be
low affinity for water even though the accumulated pressure continues to expand concrete (Kagimoto et
al. 2015). The fluid reaction products gradually transform into solid products.
Figure 3 compares two instances of aggregate debonding typically observed during performing a
microscopic examination. Empty debonding cracks (Figure 3a) were commonly observed during the early
stage of the reaction, and the filled debonding cracks (Figure 3b) were commonly observed during the
later stage of the reaction. The surfaces were prepared by polishing with water as detailed in Section 2.2.2.
During the early stage, as shown in Figure 3a, the pore fluid was mostly washed away. In contrast, during
the later stage, the reaction product was already hardened into solid product in the debonded crack as
shown in Figure 3b. This observation supports that during the early stage, many of the micro-cracks and
debonding cracks contained pore fluid which did not have role on the tensile strength and modulus of
elasticity of concrete but imparted to the compressive strength of concrete.
a) ITZ fully filled by reaction products b) Aggregate crack partially filled by reaction products
c) BSE image of an aggregate particle with cracks filled with d) Magnified view at location “1” (from Fig 4c) at ITZ with
reaction products (locations “1” and “2” identified) Ca(OH)2 bridging
e) Magnified view at location “2” (from Fig4c) with fibrous ASR f) Spectrum at location “3” (from Fig4e)
product (and location “3” identified)
5. Conclusion
This paper performed microscopic analysis of samples of ASR-affected concrete to investigate the
mechanism of partial recovery that has been observed in many laboratory studies to characteristically
follow the loss of some mechanical properties due to ASR. Concrete samples were examined under stereo-
binocular microscope, digital microscope, optical microscope and SEM. Concrete samples from different
stages of ASR were used to reveal the physical and chemical states of the reaction products and concrete
microstructure. The following are the main findings:
Pore pressure at the early stage of the reaction: When concrete is subjected to accelerated curing
conditions, ASR becomes vigorous to produce fluid reaction products. The fluid products impose pore
pressure to the concrete microstructure. The pore pressure was observed to cause exudation of the fluid
products from exposed cracks. The fluid products inside the micro-cracks and concrete pores can
contribute in resisting externally applied compressive loads, thus, generally masking any loss in
compressive strength due to ASR. However, the fluid products cannot provide any strength to positively
contribute the tensile strength and modulus of elasticity of concrete. Rather the pore pressure is
detrimental to the tensile strength and modulus of elasticity of concrete.
a) Ca b) Si
c) Na d) K
Fig. 5. Microscopic images and elemental mapping of a crack spanning paste and aggregate
Physical and chemical transformation of the reaction products at the later stage of the reaction:
With time, the reaction subsides and the fluid products gradually solidify. Debonding cracks and cracks in
the paste matrix that were caused by ASR are either filled with calcium hydroxide or are filled with ASR
products transformed by calcium hydroxide into dense and stable lime–alkali-silicate complex. While the
ASR products inside the aggregate are not easily associated with calcium, the ASR products, which were
once fluid, solidify and start bridging the cracks. The effect of solidification of fluid products, the effect of
crack bridging and the effect of transformation of ASR products into lime-alkali-silicate complex all
contribute to improve the microstructure of concrete and to cause partial recovery in the damaged
mechanical properties.
Finally, an assessment of the mechanical properties of reaction products by a nano-indentation test will be
useful to further understand the mechanism of partial recovery. A nano-indentation test has been planned
to characterize the mechanical properties of the ASR product within the aggregate and of the calcium-rich
product at the paste matrix.
6. Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge the funding provided through a contract by Canadian Nuclear Safety
Commission (CNSC). However, the contents of this paper do not represent the technical position of the
CNSC. We also acknowledge the Ministry of Transportation Ontario, Canada for providing the reactive
Spratt aggregate. Special thanks to Prof. Karl Peterson for his support in the microscopic analysis.
1 References
Ahmed, T. et al., “The effect of alkali reactivity on the mechanical properties of concrete”, Construction
and Building Materials, 2003, 17(2), pp.123–144.
ASTM C215, “Standard test method for fundamental transverse, longitudinal, and torsional resonant
frequencies of concrete specimens”, ASTM International, 2008, West Conshohocken, PA.
ASTM C39, “Standard test method for compressive strength of cylindrical concrete specimens”, ASTM
International, 2010, West Conshohocken, PA.
ASTM C469, “Standard test method for static modulus of elasticity and Poisson’s ratio of concrete in
compression”, ASTM International, 2010, West Conshohocken, PA.
ASTM C78, “Standard test method for flexural strength of concrete (using simple beam with third-point
loading)”, ASTM International, 2010, West Conshohocken, PA.
Beglarigale, A. & Yazece, H., “The effect of alkali-silica reaction on steel fiber-matrix bond
characteristics of cement based mortars”, Construction and Building Materials, 47, 2013, pp.845–
860.
Bektas, F. & Wang, K., “Performance of ground clay brick in ASR-affected concrete: effects on
expansion, mechanical properties and ASR gel chemistry”, Cement and Concrete Composites, 34(2),
2012, pp.273–278.
Gautam, B.P., “Multiaxially loaded concrete undergoing alkali–silica reaction (ASR)”, 2016, PhD thesis,
University of Toronto, Canada.
Gautam, B.P. et al., “Alkali aggregate reaction in nuclear concrete structures: part 2: concrete materials
aspects”, In 23rd Conference on Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology, 2015, Manchester,
U.K.
Giaccio, G. et al., “Mechanical behavior of concretes damaged by alkali-silica reaction”, Cement and
Concrete Research, 38(7), 2008, pp.993–1004.
Ichikawa, T. & Miura, M., “Modified model of alkali-silica reaction”, Cement and Concrete Research,
37(9), 2007, pp.1291–1297.
Jones, A.E.K. & Clark, L.A., “The effects of ASR on the properties of concrete and the implications for
assessment”, Engineering Structures, 20(9), 1998, pp.785–791.
Kagimoto, H., Yasuda, Y. & Kawamura, M., “Mechanisms of ASR surface cracking in a massive concrete
cylinder”, Advances in Concrete Construction, 3(1), 2015, pp.39–54.
Leemann, A. & Lura, P., “E-modulus of the alkali–silica-reaction product determined by micro-
indentation”, Construction and Building Materials, 44, 2013, pp.221–227.
Marzouk, H. & Langdon, S., “The effect of alkali-aggregate reactivity on the mechanical properties of
high and normal strength concrete”, Cement and Concrete Composites, 25(4-5), 2003, pp.549–556.
Multon, S., Seignol, J.F. & Toutlemonde, F., “Structural behavior of concrete beams affected by alkali-
silica reaction”, ACI Materials Journal, 102(2), 2005, pp.67–76.
Peterson, K. et al., “Crystallized alkali-silica gel in concrete from the late 1890s”, Cement and Concrete
Research, 36(8), 2006, pp.1523–1532.
Phair, J.W. et al., “Elastic and structural properties of alkaline-calcium silica hydrogels”, Journal of
Materials Research, 20(02), 2005, pp.344–349.
Sachlova, S., Prikryl, R. & Pertold, Z., “Alkali-silica reaction products: Comparison between samples
from concrete structures and laboratory test specimens”, Materials Characterization, 61(12), 2010,
pp.1379–1393.
Sanchez, L.F.M. et al., “Comparative study of a chemo–mechanical modeling for alkali silica reaction
(ASR) with experimental evidences”, Construction and Building Materials, 72, 2014, pp.301–315.
Sun, Z., Garboczi, E.J. & Shah, S.P., “Modeling the elastic properties of concrete composites: Experiment,
differential effective medium theory, and numerical simulation”, Cement and Concrete Composites,
29(1), 2007, pp.22–38.
Swamy, R.N. & Al-Asali, M.M., “Engineering properties of concrete affected by alkali-silica reaction”,
ACI Materials Journal, (Sep-Oct), 1988, pp.367–374.
Thaulow, N., Jakobsen, U.H. & Clark, B., “Composition of alkali silica gel and ettringite in concrete
railroad ties: SEM-EDX and X-ray diffraction analyses”, Cement and Concrete Research, 26(2),
1996, pp.309–318.