Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Abstract: Mexico City soil has very high specific surface, plasticity and void ratio; its natural structure is preserved until the yield
pressure ⬘y , which is typically above the in situ effective stress ⬘v, and the mechanical response changes significantly when the effective
confining stress ⬘o exceeds the yield pressure ⬘y . In this study, the effects of strain rate on the undrained response of Mexico City soil are
explored using undisturbed specimens subjected to monotonic triaxial compression tests at a constant rate of deformation. Results show
that strain-rate effects on undrained strength and mode of failure depend on ⬘y / ⬘o, hence, on the degree of natural structure preserved in
the specimen. Undrained strength increase with strain rate, particularly in the more structured specimens 共i.e., higher ⬘y / ⬘o兲. The role of
⬘y / ⬘o on strain-rate effects in this unremolded natural soil resembles the effect of overconsolidation ratio on resedimented specimens. The
limitations in using standard triaxial equipment for strain-rate effect studies are discussed.
DOI: 10.1061/共ASCE兲1090-0241共2009兲135:2共300兲
CE Database subject headings: Undisturbed soils; Soil structures; Strain rate; Deposition; Triaxial compression; Strength; Mexico.
Downloaded 12 May 2011 to 130.207.50.192. Redistribution subject to ASCE license or copyright. Visithttp://www.ascelibrary.org
• May be more pronounced in high plasticity clays 共Berre and porous stones built in the end caps, and enclosed by two latex
Bjerrum 1973; Vaid et al. 1979兲. The effect of plasticity may membranes separated by a thin film of silicone oil to minimize
vanish in natural, structured overconsolidation 共OC兲 clays flow through. All specimens were subjected to isotropic consoli-
共Graham et al. 1983兲. dation to the target effective confinement ⬘o and left under con-
• Is higher in natural-structured and in remolded-OC clays than stant effective confining stress for 12 h past the end of
in normally consolidated 共NC兲 clays 关in terms of consolidation. The back-pressure was maintained at 340 kPa; the
Su / ⬘o—Lacasse 共1979兲; Richardson and Whitman 共1963兲; measured Skempton B-values exceeded 0.97 in all tests. After
Sheahan et al. 共1996兲; Zhu and Yin 共2000兲兴. consolidation, specimens were subjected to deviatoric compres-
• The strain at peak resistance does not vary with strain rate sion under undrained conditions.
共Vaid and Campanella 1977兲. Two control variables are selected for this study: strain rate ˙
and the ratio ⬘y / ⬘o between the soil yield stress ⬘y and the im-
Excess Pore Pressure. Changes in strength have been associ- posed effective isotropic confinement stress ⬘o. Specimens pre-
ated to changes in pore pressure 共Richardson and Whitman 1963兲. serve the natural structure when ⬘y / ⬘o1.0 and become gradually
Indeed, there is a tendency to higher excess pore pressure genera- destructured as ⬘y / ⬘o falls bellow 1.0 共note that ⬘y / ⬘o ⬎ 1.0 cor-
tion during low strain-rate undrained loading, and the effect is responds to the overconsolidated OC condition, and o⬘⬘y to the
more pronounced in extension than compression loading 共Casa- normally consolidated NC state in regular sedimentary soils兲. Iso-
grande and Wilson 1951; Bjerrum et al. 1958; Crawford 1959; tropic consolidation data gathered with specimens that span the
Richardson and Whitman 1963; Zhu et al. 1999b兲. Excess pore full void ratio range encountered in this study show that the yield
pressure generation in structured OC clays, ⬘o ⬍ y⬘, is less sensi- pressure is ⬘y = 95.6 kPa⫾ 5.63 SD 共break noted in both e-log ⬘
tive to strain rate than in destructured clays 共Lefebvre and LeB- and the linear-linear e-⬘ space兲.
oeuf 1987兲.
Downloaded 12 May 2011 to 130.207.50.192. Redistribution subject to ASCE license or copyright. Visithttp://www.ascelibrary.org
Table 1. Results of CIU Tests on Mexico City Soil
o⬘ ˙ f 共1-3兲max uf
Test number 共kPa兲 共%/h兲 y⬘ / o⬘ 共%兲 共kPa兲 共kPa兲 Su / o⬘
Series 1
T1–2.4–1% 40 1 2.4 3.20 68.80 32.50 0.86
T2–2.4–5% 5 3.80 122.57 35.80 1.53
T3–2.4–100% 100 3.56 142.64 36.20 1.78
T4–2.4–800% 800 3.33 147.25 37.30 1.84
Series 2
T5–1.2–1% 80 1 1.2 3.59 115.87 61.00 0.72
T6–1.2–5% 5 3.47 139.27 66.40 0.87
T7–1.2–100% 100 3.15 154.18 67.50 0.96
T8–1.2–800% 800 3.30 178.40 76.80 1.12
Series 3
T9–0.60–1% 160 1 0.60 3.89 146.29 120.30 0.46
T10–0.60–5% 5 3.77 149.67 118.90 0.47
T11–0.60–100% 100 3.94 180.19 138.60 0.56
T12–0.60–800% 800 4.31 215.18 153.10 0.67
Series 4
T13–0.32–1% 300 1 0.32 3.93 216.34 220.70 0.36
T14–0.32–5% 5 4.04 216.63 196.50 0.36
T15–0.32–100% 100 4.10 332.27 246.60 0.55
T16–0.32–800% 800 3.96 314.73 252.90 0.52
Series 5
T–2.4–0.1% 40 0.1 2.4 3.27 65.92 32.70 0.82
T–2.4–0.5% 0.5 3.80 78.43 37.20 0.98
T–2.4–1% 1 2.05 85.06 28.30 1.06
T–2.4–2.5% 2.5 2.84 92.14 36.70 1.15
Note: Each test is named using the letter T followed by test number, the ratio ⬘y / o⬘ 共2.4, 1.2, 0.60, 0.32兲, and the strain rate ˙ 共1, 5, 100 and 800% / h兲.
⬘y = 95.6 kPa⫾ 5.63 SD 共yielding stress兲. Su= 共1-3兲 / 2.
quences of thermal fluctuations 共the daily thermal fluctuation was tive stress path computed with the measured pore pressure shifts
restricted to ⫾1.5° C in the laboratory—smaller fluctuations are to the left in the p⬘-q space. Therefore, higher effective stress
expected inside the cell given the thermal inertia of the device兲. strength parameters may be obtained for high strain rates due to
However, the more compressible boundary layer against end experimental bias. Credible effective stress paths for the low
caps causes higher pore pressure generation at the end caps strain-rate tests ˙ = 1 % /h and 5 % / h are similar and show an ef-
共where fluid pressure is measured兲 than at midheight of the speci- fective stress friction angle that varies between = 42° for the
men during fast undrained loading. The time for internal pore structured specimens 共c⬘ ⬎ 0兲 and = 35° for the destructured
pressure homogenization within the soil mass can be estimated as specimens 共c⬘ = 0兲.
t = L2 / cv where L = drainage length; and cv = coefficient of consoli- Fig. 2 includes additional low strain-rate data gathered as part
dation. Let us consider a value of cv = 0.55 mm2 / s for Mexico of this study 共˙ = 0.1 to 2.5% / h, at ⬘y / ⬘o = 2.2兲, and the data re-
City soil 共Diaz-Rodriguez 2003兲; then, it would take 42 min for ported by Alberro and Santoyo 共1973兲—Texcoco basin—test con-
longitudinal drainage 共H = 75 mm兲, and 10 min for drainage ditions: ˙ = 0.045 to 94% / h, and ⬘y / o⬘ = 1.8– 0.45. The general
across the radius of the specimen 共d = 36 mm—in the case of ef- trend in the data can be captured using an expression similar to
fective filter paper on the periphery兲. For comparison, the time to the one used in Zhu and Yin 共2000兲 and shown as dashed lines in
reach a nominal failure strain of ⬃4% is 240 min for ˙ = 1 % / h, Fig. 2
冉 冊 冉 冊
48 min for ˙ = 5 % / h, 2.4 min for ˙ = 100% / h, 18 sec for ˙
= 800% / h. The comparison between these internally and exter- Su ⬘y ˙
= 0.2 + 0.1 log
nally imposed time scales renders pore pressures measured at end ⬘o ⬘o %
caps uncertain for the two high-strain-rate series ˙ = 100 and 10−5
h
800%/h. This analysis explains the higher pore pressures mea-
sured in this study during the two high strain-rates undrained for ˙ ⬎ ˙ t and ⬘y /⬘o = 0.3 – 2.4 共1兲
loading tests than during low strain-rate tests. It is recognized that
the problem is related to end effects by stress and strain nonuni- Su
formity combined with system compliance and pore-pressure dif- = 0.2 assumed for ˙ ⬍ ˙ t 共2兲
⬘o
fusion as mentioned by Carter 共1982兲. Sheahan et al. 共1996兲
lessened this bias by making measurements at midheight and where all trends converge at Su / o⬘ = 0.2 and ˙ t = 10−5 % / h. The
Blight 共1965兲 by using lubricated ends. existence of a minimum strength at very small strain rates below
While the specimen failure mode and undrained strength may a threshold value requires further validation. Published threshold
not be affected by this boundary phenomenon, the inferred effec- strain rates include: ˙ t = 5 ⫻ 10−2 % / h for plastic Drammen clay
Downloaded 12 May 2011 to 130.207.50.192. Redistribution subject to ASCE license or copyright. Visithttp://www.ascelibrary.org
Fig. 1. Stress-strain curves for triaxial compression tests on Mexico City soil
共Berre and Bjerrum 1973兲, ˙ t = 15⫻ 10−2 % / h for Haney clay solidated specimens were then sheared at constant strain rates ˙ .
共Vaid and Campanella 1977兲, ˙ t ⬇ 10−3 % / h for various postgla- It is concluded that Mexico City soil exhibits significant time-
cier clays 关Graham et al. 共1983兲—weak evidence兴; ˙ t = 10−5 % / h dependent stress-strain effects, with the following characteristics:
for Mexico City soil 共this study兲. • High strain rates result in higher undrained strength Su / ⬘o.
Furthermore, more structured specimens 共high ⬘y / ⬘o兲 exhibit
higher strength Su / ⬘o sensitivity to the strain rate ˙ . This result
Conclusions resembles observations gathered with remolded-resedimented
specimens sheared from NC and OC states. Strength trends for
The exceptional properties of Mexico City soil provide a unique different strain rates tend to converge towards ˙ ⬍ 10−5 % / h at
opportunity to test current concepts related to strain-rate effects, a minimum undrained strength of Su / ⬘o ⬇ 0.2.
with emphasis on the role of the natural soil structure. This study • The axial strain at peak deviatoric stress is independent of the
was based on isotropically consolidated, undrained triaxial com- strain rate.
pression tests, where undisturbed specimens were consolidated to • The tendency to shear strain localization in conventional tri-
initial effective confinements ⬘o below and above the yield stress axial compression loading increases with high strain rates and
of the soil ⬘y to attain different degrees of destructuration. Con- degree of remnant structure.
Downloaded 12 May 2011 to 130.207.50.192. Redistribution subject to ASCE license or copyright. Visithttp://www.ascelibrary.org
support was provided by the Goizueta Foundation. The assistance
of Guadalupe Salinas-Galindo and Pedro Moreno-Carrizales is
acknowledged.
References
Alberro, J., and Santoyo, E. 共1973兲. “Long term behavior of Mexico City
clay.” Proc., 8th Int. Conf. on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engi-
neering, Vol. 1, 1–9.
Berre, T., and Bjerrum, L. 共1973兲. “Shear strength of normally consoli-
dated clays.” Proc., 8th Int. Conf. on Soil Mechanics and Foundation
Engineering, Vol. 1, 39–49.
Bjerrum, L. 共1972兲. “Embankments on soft ground.” ASCE Proc., Spe-
cialty Conf. on Performance of Earth and Earth Supported Structures,
Vol. 2, 1–54.
Fig. 2. Relationship of normalized undrained shear strength versus Bjerrum, L., Simons, N., and Torblaa, I. 共1958兲. “The effect of time on
strain rate 共log-scale兲 for triaxial compression tests on Mexico City the shear strength of soft marine clay.” Proc., Brussels Conf. on Earth
soil Pressure Problems, Vol. 1, 148–158.
Blight, G. E. 共1965兲. “Shear stress and pore pressure in triaxial testing.”
J. Soil Mech. and Found. Div., 91共6兲, 25–39.
Carter, J. P. 共1982兲. “Prediction of the non-homogeneous behaviour of
clay in the triaxial test.” Geotechnique, 32共1兲, 55–58.
Casagrande, A., and Wilson, S. D. 共1951兲. “Effect of rate loading on the
strength of clays and shales at constant water content.” Geotechnique,
2共3兲, 251–263.
Crawford, C. B. 共1959兲. “The influence of rate of strain on effective
stresses in sensitive clay.” ASTM Spec. Tech. Publ., 254, 36–68.
Díaz Rodríguez, J. A. 共2003兲. “Characterization and engineering proper-
ties of Mexico City lacustrine soils” Characterization and engineer-
ing properties of natural soils, Vol. 1, Balkema, Rotterdam, The
Netherlands, 725–755.
Díaz-Rodríguez, J. A., Leroueil, S., and Alemán, J. D. 共1992兲. “Yielding
of Mexico City clay and other natural clays.” J. Geotech. Engrg.,
118共7兲, 981–995.
Díaz-Rodríguez, J. A., Lozano-Santa, Cruz R., Davila-Alcocer, V. M.,
Vallejo, E., and Girón, P. 共1998兲. “Physical, chemical, and mineral-
ogical properties of Mexico City sediments: A geotechnical perspec-
tive.” Can. Geotech. J., 35共4兲, 600–610.
Fig. 3. Mode of failure for triaxial compression tests on Mexico City Díaz-Rodríguez, J. A., and Santamarina, J. C. 共2001兲. “Mexico City soil
soil 共from visual observations at the time of failure兲 behavior at different stains—Observations and physical interpreta-
tion.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 127共9兲, 783–789.
Graham, J., Crooks, J. H. A., and Bell, A. L. 共1983兲. “Time effects on the
• Experimental biases can play a critical role in the study of stress-strain behaviour of natural soft clays.” Geotechnique, 33共3兲,
strain-rate effects. In particular, relative time scales between 327–340.
internal pressure diffusion and externally imposed deformation Kenney, C. 共1959兲. “Discussion.” ASTM Spec. Tech. Publ., 254, 49–58.
rates need careful consideration. Local conditions at the Kulhawy, F. H., and Mayne, P. W. 共1990兲. Manual of estimating soil
specimen-cap interface affect the measurement of longitudinal properties for foundation design, Geotechnical Engineering Group,
stiffness, constrain lateral deformation, and cause higher local Cornell Univ., Ithaca, N.Y.
pore pressure during fast undrained loading; the latter biases Lacasse, S. 共1979兲. “Effect of load duration on undrained behaviour of
clay and sand—Literature survey.” Internal Rep. No. 40007-1, Nor-
the interpretation of effective stress parameters in high strain-
wegian Geotechnical Institute, Oslo, Norway.
rate tests. Lefebvre, G., and LeBouf, D. 共1987兲. “Rate effects and cyclic loading of
Published results suggest greater strain-rate effects in sensitive clays.” J. Geotech. Engrg., 113共5兲, 476–489.
ko-consolidated specimens 共and in extension loading兲 than in the Leroueil, S., and Tavenas, F. 共1979兲. “Discussion on ‘Strain rate behav-
isotropically consolidated specimens tested in this study. Re- iour of Saint-Jean-Vianney clay’ by Vaid et al.” Can. Geotech. J.,
search in progress extends this study to ko consolidated specimens 16共3兲, 616–620.
using local measurements of deformation and pore pressure. Lo, K. Y., and Morin, J. P. 共1972兲. “Strength anisotropy and time effects
of two sensitive clays.” Can. Geotech. J., 9共3兲, 261–277.
Martínez-Vasquez, J. J. 共2004兲. “Efecto de la velocidad de deformación
en la resistencia al esfuerzo cortante del subsuelo de la ciudad de
Acknowledgments México.” MS thesis, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México,
Mexico City, México.
The writers are grateful to the anonymous reviewers for their Prapaharan, S., Chameau, J. L., and Holtz, R. D. 共1989兲. “Effect of strain
insightful comments. This study has been supported by funds re- rate on undrained strength derived from pressuremeter tests.” Geo-
ceived from Dirección General de Apoyo al Personal Académico, technique, 39共4兲, 615–624.
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México 共UNAM兲. Additional Richardson, A. M., Jr., and Whitman, R. V. 共1963兲. “Effect of strain-rate
Downloaded 12 May 2011 to 130.207.50.192. Redistribution subject to ASCE license or copyright. Visithttp://www.ascelibrary.org
upon undrained shear resistance of a saturated remoulded fat clay.” undisturbed clay.” J. Geotech. Engrg. Div., 103共7兲, 693–709.
Geotechnique, 13共4兲, 310–324. Vaid, Y. P., Robertson, P. K., Vaid, Y. P., and Campanella, R. G. 共1979兲.
Sheahan, T. C., Ladd, C. C., and Germaine, J. T. 共1996兲. “Rate dependent “Strain rate behavior of Saint-Jean-Vianney clay.” Can. Geotech. J.,
undrained shear behavior of saturated clay.” J. Geotech. Engrg., 16共1兲, 34–42.
122共2兲, 99–108. Zhu, J., and Yin, J. 共2000兲. “Strain-rate-dependent stress-strain behavior
Singh, A., and Mitchell, J. K. 共1968兲. “General stress-strain-time function of overconsolidated Hong Kong marine clay.” Can. Geotech. J.,
for soils.” J. Soil Mech. and Found. Div., 94 共1兲, 21–46. 37共6兲, 1272–1282.
Tavenas, F., Leroueil, S., LaRochelle, P., and Roy, M. 共1978兲. “Creep
Zhu, J., Yin, J., and Luk, S. 共1999a兲. “Strain-rate effects on stress-strain-
behaviour of an undisturbed lightly overconsolidated clay.” Can. Geo-
tech. J., 15共3兲, 402–423. strength behavior of soft clay.” Proc., Eleventh Asian Regional Conf.
Taylor, D. W. 共1943兲. “Cylindrical compression research program on on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Balkema, Rotter-
stress-deformation and strength characteristics of soils.” 9th Progress dam, The Netherlands, 61–64.
Rep. to U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Waterways Experiment Sta- Zhu, J., Yin, J., and Luk, S. 共1999b兲. “Time-dependent stress-strain be-
tion, Massachusetts Inst. of Technology, Cambridge, Mass. havior of soft Hong Kong marine deposits.” Geotech. Test. J., 22共2兲,
Vaid, Y. P., and Campanella, R. G. 共1977兲. “Time-dependent behavior of 118–126.
Downloaded 12 May 2011 to 130.207.50.192. Redistribution subject to ASCE license or copyright. Visithttp://www.ascelibrary.org