Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Models of Trading
Models of Trading
Josselyn Arevalo
with none” (Thomas Jefferson, 1801) Trading in Economy is one of the most important
topic to analyze. That’s why Economics has multiple models to analyze this relationship.
Trade is a basic economic concept. It determines the relationship between two individuals
disagreement about some topics, but we universally agree that free trade–meaning the
summarize this mutual benefit, economists often say “There are gains from trade.” (The
Lybrary of Economics and Liberty, 2008). In this essay there will be a summary of the
First of all, we have the most known and basic model, Gravity Model. It was
presented in 1962., by Jan Tinberger. Who proposed that the size of bilateral trade flows
between any two countries can be approximated by employing the ‘gravity equation’,
which is derived from Newton’s theory of gravitation. (Economics O, 2008). The theory
of gravitation implies that two planets are connected two another one based in the size
and distance of them, it is equal on trading. When we talk about the size, it refers in the
GDP of the country, and the distance is the trade cost of distribution. This model premises
said that, a bigger distance or cost, the trading decrease, but a bigger GDP the trading
Fij=G*Mi*Mj/Dij
In this formula G is the constant, F stands for trade flow, D stands for the distance and M
stands for the economic dimensions of the countries that are being measured.
The theory states that a country should specialize in producing the goods in which it has
country when it has the least opportunity cost in producing a specific good. The
determinants of comparative advantage are labor productivity and labor costs. However,
there are several arguments that limits this theory, principally based on the assumptions
of the model, some of the most important ones are that it assumes that the only mobile
factor is labor, and it has total mobility from industry to industry. Then it assumes that a
country can specialize only in tradable goods (Golub & Hsieh, 2000). Even though its
critics, the Ricardian model is still very useful for bilateral analysis of trade between
countries and there are several ways to analyze and apply comparative advantage
nowadays.
Finally, the factor mobility model, that assumes the following. First that the
depends in the proportions in which factors are combined. Second, that one commodity
needs a greater proportion of one factor than the other commodity. And lastly, factors
of these countries is more labor intensive and produces mainly labor insensitive
commodity, and the other is more capital intensive and produces mainly capital
insensitive commodity. There’s trade between the two countries, but when one of them
limits trade by applying a tariff or prohibition to importation, this will make the price of
the prohibited good to increase, and the marginal productivity of the factor needed to
produce it to increase too. In order to satisfy internal demand of the product, the country
will import the factors for making the prohibited good and satisfy its demand. As it can
be seen, factor mobility incremented with the need of the factors that produced the
prohibited good. After this, the tariff is no longer necessary, eh economy has reached a
In the other hand, the same theory argues that increase impediments to factor
movements stimulate trade. If the government applies a tax for imported factors, as for
example capital. Then the equilibrium price of the good that need capital will rise, and
the prices would not be equalized. As this happens, the country will find it convenient
importing the good itself from other countries increasing trade (Mundell, 2003).
We analyze three of the most known models of patterns of trade in Economy. Each
of one has the same aim, that is understand the mechanisms of trading, the efficiency of
each relationship. Every model has pros and cons, but is important to known each of one
and to applied each model, dependently in the situation. Some assumptions, and in other
cases the lack of them, will determine the use of an specific model.
References
Golub, S., & Hsieh, C.-T. (2000). Classical Ricardian Theory of Comparative